Who’s right, Terrence or Eric?

@moreno101791

Ай бұрын

Terrence is retarded

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

You make a lot more sense than TH or any of his supporters (TH cult members) do.

@WilliamAllnutt

Ай бұрын

That question is insane. Eric is interesting to listen to most of the time. Terrence not ever, even for an instant. The delivery and the content make my skin crawl. So I guess that makes Eric right, right?

@lordoftheeaglesreaches3710

Ай бұрын

@@DrBrianKeating Eric!!

@r1spa

Ай бұрын

@@DrBrianKeating who are we to determine who's right? Especially when NO ONE knows everything The mindset should be open to new ideas considering the fact that we have gaps and although we know a lot we don't know everything

The reason for Joe Rogan to let people like Terrence Howard talk on his show and make these extraordinary claims is what happened right after it. Smarter and more reasonable voice came forward and started explaining what was going on (even together with him as in the example of Weinstein). For me this is an overall win. The large mayority of people listening to these podcasts (like me) became smarter for it because of the dialogue and conversations happening because of it. Topics I would have otherwise never been exposed to now have been brought closer to me. And taking everyones claims with a grain of salt should be on todays "internet survival kit" anyway.

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

I'd argue that it just polarized people more into what they already believed in, in this fudged up world, barring perhaps a few exceptions. I don't believe many people who "believe" in Terrence Howard's "claims"/"theories" listened to Eric Weinsteins rebuttals and concluded that he must have been wrong.

@foundationofthought7155

Ай бұрын

Yes but Weinstein had a huge agenda here, because he is also not taken seriously sometimes. He realized all those claims are bogus but his point was that three establishment doesn't want to listen to ppl that they consider not in the circle. Which is somewhat true for every single thing we do. If I say I can beat Jon Jones because I have a very good backhand slap that nobody has seen, but have no proof, should Joe take me seriously? In this case he is the establishment.

@Nall412

Ай бұрын

@@foundationofthought7155your logic here is flawed and nonsensical… you might want to think over this one again.

@donnick83

Ай бұрын

@@user-sg8rn7kc7t I'm not the smartest but when Terrence was explaining something toward the end Eric simply said I don't even wanna touch it that's not a more reasonable smarter person Eric pretty much spent his time saying listen your wrong cuz there's more of us who believe what I believe and we have studied all our lives so that make us right Eric even said quote I don't know if hes right I mite be wrong so that doesn't leave you confused? I'm not saying Terrence is right but people can't just keep saying he's crazy without really diving into what he's talking about just cuz he's not part of a particular academic community that needs to stop..

@matthewnelson1136

Ай бұрын

I generally find science overwhelming or boring. Hearing things from a person who is more creatively inclined made the subjects much more interesting, and in the process of listening to scientist "debunk" him, I've also learned some things. Scientist can be very pompous, complaining about giving someone a platform, please

I actually think what he's doing is conflating his own dreams with reality. It's known as the Freddy Krueger effect.

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

@@andrewmoonbeam321 Stealing this line 💯💯💯

@mattlindgren2886

Ай бұрын

I see what you did there.

@mastrotentaculopapichulo

Ай бұрын

I still see what you did last Sunday

@Maxrepfitgm

Ай бұрын

Lol 😆 😂 Nice one

@ericchastain1863

Ай бұрын

So do dreams create mytheral valance in thoughtistics

Please try to get Eric Weinstein and Edward Witten to do a JRE Episode. It's the episode we all need. Maybe even have Brian as a mediator too you’re always great at it. Rogan has the largest platform and reach no doubt.

@Gallowglass7

Ай бұрын

That would absolutely brilliant

@djsparkyy

Ай бұрын

@@user-bt2od3yw1b .000001% of the audience would have the intelligence and knowledge to understand that conversation I'd still listen though!

@kmb_jr

Ай бұрын

Edward would never.

@Gojiraa666

Ай бұрын

I agree, that conversation would shake the pillars of the earth.

@Gojiraa666

Ай бұрын

@@djsparkyyyou’re not wrong at all and I too would enjoy it regardless. I may not understand most of what they are saying but it is still inspiring and at the end of the day, I would choose a convo I couldn’t understand over a loose, boring meh-burger every single time. Seek out wisdom basically.

"In fact I'm one of the worlds experts in the Dunning Kreuger effect" 🤣😂🤣 that was a good one, Dr Keating!!

@earl5022

Ай бұрын

Aren't we all fools living the dunning-kruger effect? None of us know it all. And know just enough to know there's more to know. Those who put others in the dunning-kruger effect are the biggest fools, because they think they know it all and can't learn from other fools.

@doctoruttley

Ай бұрын

I caught that one too. He’s got such a subtle sense of humor, it is easy to miss them at times. 👌🏻😂

@dailysmelly9756

Ай бұрын

Or, according to Terrence Howard, the Dunkin Donuts Freddy Krueger effect.

@Adambombgallerie

Ай бұрын

@@doctoruttleynot subtle, spectral.

@rwm1980

Ай бұрын

I thought he was being literal​@@doctoruttley

I think you need to do some DMT

@JaredFarrer

Ай бұрын

I think all people who are in leadership roles or PhDs should have psychedelic experience at least once or twice.

@okeyokey578

Ай бұрын

@@JaredFarrer why?

@okeyokey578

Ай бұрын

why?

@riffman6948

Ай бұрын

Because it gives you those couple important puzzle pieces u didn't even know u needed or even lost

@user-qo7hx5ug8j

Ай бұрын

@@BroncLander they have

If Terrence Howard were an average Joe, then people like Joe Rogan, Brian Keating, and Eric Weinstein would laugh in his face.

@ajR_tv

Ай бұрын

Academia does that anyway, it's deeply imbedded in elitist culture. Everyone over 25 knows this is just how things are and has been for a very long time.

@MickWop

Ай бұрын

no shxt... the literal whole point of Weinstein taking time out of his day was because he (Terrence*) reaches such a large audience with his platform making it way more dangerous to spread that kind of misinformation as opposed to the average Joe with a couple hundred friends on facebook and telegram that more than likely already subscribe to this hogwash.

@livinginthisgalaxy7961

Ай бұрын

IDK...Joe rogan isn't as smart as all the alpha bros think he is😅

@neepers

Ай бұрын

He's just a bullshitter, and Rogan constantly falls for those idiots.

@r1spa

Ай бұрын

That's a dumb statement for the following reason as it can go both ways Because Terrence is not an average person and a celebrity, that's why he is getting so much hate when talking about science.

Weinstein is quite reasonable. But this guy is just all over the place. But I liked the conversation for the fact that Weinstein demonstrates beautifully how to have a conversation even if the next guy is almost indefensible.

@someblackguy100

Ай бұрын

@amrendrapandey8952 get off his nuts he don't know u

@jesusmtz29

Ай бұрын

Eric is a clown

@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu

Ай бұрын

Check this, I see a problem. Inflation might not be happening when you comb through the actual observation evidence more honestly. Radiation and mass energy dynamics differ fundamentally, with radiation representing kinetic energy and mass embodying potential energy in a low kinetic state. This distinction means we cannot equate the behavior of photons with mass objects like galaxies, atoms, and massive particles. Redshift, often seen as evidence for the universe's expansion, might be misunderstood due to these intrinsic differences. The expanding universe concept assumes an external vantage point, which we lack. Observing from within, mass radiates energy and gravitational waves, decaying and shrinking proportionally to these losses, creating an illusion of expansion when compared across different masses where all mass evaporates at the same rate do to it's fundamental energy dynamics being the same (volume shrinks). Additionally, galaxies formed from the freezing and breakdown of the Big Bang's barometric waves rather than their continuous expansion, indicating a localized energy dissipation and structure formation process, in the form of angular motion potential energy wells (galaxies), with radiation loss over time (from gravitational waves and radiation). This suggests redshift and cosmic observations indicate mass shrinkage due to radiation or dissipation of big bang convection energy. This explanations is grounded in observables without assuming an external framework that can't be grasped scientifically.

@consistentche3979

Ай бұрын

He wouldn't let the guy talk. A wasted time talking about the right vocabulary instead of the working inventions of Mr Howard.

@tkyotv1794

Ай бұрын

@@consistentche3979what working inventions?

We still talk about this bullcrap because we live in the age of clowns 🤡

@tallahoramismo

Ай бұрын

✳️ *Content for Views* ✳️ *Opportunity to bring science to people who aren't usually interested in science.*

@yianniskanellopoulos6719

Ай бұрын

@@tallahoramismo you could have said the same for the flat earthers, and every other clown. It saddens me that we need clowns to promote science. While we have geniuses like Brian, Eric, Sabine etc. I wonder these clowns haven't gone to school? Do they know how a book works? Or have they smoked themselves retarded?

I'm a US patent attorney and agree, I searched the USPTO database and his patent application was abandoned, so that's an abandoned patent application, not a patent. I have no idea where he gets the number 97 from. Perhaps to him 1 X 1 is also 97?

@FLAC2023

Ай бұрын

Both Terrence and Eric are Con artists

@WilliamAllnutt

Ай бұрын

@@matthewmulkeen 🤣🤣🤣

@duartecunhaleao

Ай бұрын

Could it be there are 96 then??

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

I’ve seen someone trying to research this. There’s a thread on Reddit about it actually. Patents were filed under slightly different names but yes he has APPLIED for something like 90 patents but not all have been granted. TH says he has to clearly to embellish is credibility.

@rwm1980

Ай бұрын

He said the lawyers wanted him to pay 200,000 dollars, lol I wouldn't pay either

I Think people love to witness situations like this because deep down, they want to feel ‘empowered.’ They perceive the ‘academic’ as being wrong, while the person who doesn’t conform to rules or follow conventional paths is seen as better, even a ‘genius.’ It’s reminiscent of 80s movies where an ordinary individual triumphs over Olympic champions and achieves the seemingly impossible. There’s a sense that perhaps, even without formal study, training, or effort, they too can succeed.

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

AND IT IS possible,, but there's being a genius and being a genius and most geniuses respect rational basics....... Howard doesn't want to do that, he's delusional and evidently he's seen the movie Good Will Hunting but doesn't remember it because he's casting himself in the title of the main character... His entire performance at Oxford was a joke,, and oh well but he's only gotten crazier...

@RodrigoCorreia2099

Ай бұрын

@@micnorton9487 I agree. I believe all this attention It's just feeding his ego and alienating him even more.

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

@@RodrigoCorreia2099 It's kinda sad because as an outsider observer I only see the paranoid narcissism and the delusions of grandeur,, and I haven't walked in his shoes... at first I wanted to believe his flower of Life stuff but then when he started with the one times one stuff it was plain he was delusional and I just,, I felt why is his family not doing anything about this...

We can all sympathize with Terrence going against the establishment, as we feel something is off in physics (if not academia entirely). Lacking formal education, Eric’s help is appreciated to get his ideas translated into more modest proportions and more acceptable language. Eric’ s own interest lie in the geometric part of Terrence ideas. But new descriptive geometry itself will not save the day. We can’t fix physics by adding new stuff. We can only fix it by pointing out the flaws in our existing theories first. Anyone can add new geometry (GU) or new math (string theory) that has some kind of correct correlation to reality. That’s easy. What is hard, is to cut the crap and start to acknowledge Einstein’s SR is incompatible with Einstein’s GR. All other subjects are irrelevant if we don’t fix this first. The main discussion is about whether we have a real grid (spacetime) or not in physics. And if we agree we do have a real grid; how does motion impact this grid (think contraction of frontal space and time) and how does the grid in reciprocity impact the object in motion (think adding relativistic mass and energy to the object). We have been potty trained not to discuss this single most essential topic in the landscape of physics. Instead we are encouraged to discuss the irrelevant topic of having two different maps of the territory (namely GR and QP). Sorry, but who cares if we have two descriptions. Have 10 different descriptions for my sake. It is not about having different maps of the territory. The essence is whether the territory physically exists in the first place. Einstein’s GR says the MUST be a physically real grid (spacetime). Einstein’s SR says there is no such thing as a spacetime grid and thus speeds of objects are relative only to them selves. Both theories can NOT both de fundamentally correct. Einstein later admitted there must be a real grid otherwise GR could not work through it. It is now up to us to insert this spacetime grid (and its frontal contraction due to speed) as a reality into SR. How else do we suggest the moving object gets its relativistic mass (inverse time) and relativistic energy (inverse space). If speeds were relative only to each other, there wouldn’t be relativistic energy and mass associated with speeding objects, right? Why do we think Einstein constantly dodged the question of relativistic mass during his entire career? The denial of spacetime as a fabric is a LIE that has gone on for 100 years, stopping all progress. Anyone who doesn’t first address this issue is not serious about wanting to grasp fundamental physics leave alone improve our understanding of it.

@elvisponari3481

Ай бұрын

@@RWin-fp5jn lovely

I watched the Rogan Eric and Terrence interview. I think that Terrence is smart, but he's no mathematics, physics or science expert. He's deluded by his own hubris. Thanks for your rigorous review Brian. Absolutely fantastic.

@timellis6914

Ай бұрын

I agree. It seems like he gets an audience by celebrity. His content is just disappointing.

@MDCDiGiPiCs

Ай бұрын

@@marcosolo6491 most people are smart, just like you pal, it doesn't mean that you are in the league of the scientific elite, or maybe you're one of the millions of typical turds on the internet that have to say something, anything to make themselves feel better. Poor you TROLL

So Terrence is explaining something toward the end and Eric says I don't even wanna touch it Eric spent most his time telling him your wrong because your wrong because we studied longer and there's more of us who believe what I believe, Eric didn't explain why Terrence was wrong he just explained his own knowledge and why it's right

@henrytep8884

Ай бұрын

Eric does explain why he is wrong multiple of times. What are you even talking about??

@gabrielsilva5780

Ай бұрын

@@henrytep8884 naaa, all he says is "nu huh, you are using our words and terminology wrongly and that hurt our feelings" hahahaha that's all Eric said

@andrewdavis8777

Ай бұрын

He explained why Terrence was wrong for 4 hours. Where were you?

@ericgraham8150

Ай бұрын

Well, consider if someone came into your trade or expertise. Something you’d been successfully been doing for many years. Like maybe being a carpenter or a surgeon. They tried to tell you that you’ve been building houses wrong for the last 20 years… they called nails screws, and Vice verse. They were trying to say they could build a house better than you, yet they had never actually built their own house. They were giving you blue prints that had a hand drawn house that was pretty an abstract design that had no technical information… or technical information that didn’t actually made sense in reality. They were telling you dimensions and instructions that were non sensical . You would try and correct them where they were going wrong and show them all the issues they were confused with.

@juggernauts444

Ай бұрын

The calm approach Eric used remind me of the doctor in the movie Mr. Glass. Dr. Ellie Staple: A psychiatrist specializing in delusions of grandeur who treats patients convinced they are superhuman beings and attempts to are not superhumans. If there is any true or knowledge that they don’t want revealed what approach should they use to stop it from being revealed? The direct approach from the NSA saying this is a matter of national security and taking prohibiting Terrance from disclosing the information. Knowing Terrance he will still do it. Or the Epstein approach and Terrace outing himself. Not convenient either. Terrance talk about zero energy and other topics that if true will change everything. I give Terrance the benefit of the doubt and will wait for him to bring forward proof repeatable experiments. Time will tell

When Neil Degrasse Tyson talks about the Dunning Kruger effect, I hope he read their paper, "Unskilled and Unaware", because if he did, he would realize that graph that he's talking about isn't in it. The great irony of it all, is that him doing that, is itself, a quintessential example of the Dunning Kruger effect.

@Virakotxa

Ай бұрын

To me, he always exemplarized the whole concept to perfection. No matter how wrong Terrence was, I couldn't help but to laugh out loud at that line.

@JaredFarrer

Ай бұрын

A lot of scientists suffer from this assuming there doctorate extends to other subjects…. You may have a PhD in astrophysics but that doesn’t mean you know anything about psychology or physiology

@wrelensmash

Ай бұрын

Tyson fell for many of his political circles' hoaxes. He is just as bamboozled as those he sees.

@Dayz3O6

Ай бұрын

@@JaredFarrer dude is a cult believing in more than 2 genders, Neil is as political as you can get his PhD mean nothing if cult dogma cloud your common sense with actual reality.

@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523

Ай бұрын

@@JaredFarrer... and the other way around, but I have to admit that physicists are more prompted to do that

You are NOT anywhere CLOSE to “harsh” enough on Terrance, nor was Eric. Why are you not calling for Howard to be institutionalized? Why are you not screaming at the top of your lungs about how dangerous and corrosive it is to humanity to be platforming narcissistic lunatics?

I hope Dr. Brian addresses Terrence Howard's citation of the "Dewey decimal system" to defend his thesis. (Of course, it would've been better had Terrence actually used the system to find some books in his local library, but what the heck...)

This dude is spitting straight bullshit and the world is afraid to call him on it. Tough times. 😊

@gen_x_dad

Ай бұрын

He's been called on it many times. He just keeps getting attention because he's famous and the usual crowd considers him a misunderstood genius challenging big science.

@JaredFarrer

Ай бұрын

The guy is a narcissistic retard who thinks he is a special being that some alien planted these ideas in his brain. It’s comedic

@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523

Ай бұрын

Terrence Howard, Donald Trump or Eric Weinstein?

@busybillyb33

Ай бұрын

Doing so will cause a tear in their own fabric of reality they want to push onto others. i.e. they don't want to be subjected to the same level of critical thinking themselves.

@onlyonewhyphy

Ай бұрын

I think calling him on it has almost become its own genre of KZread video.

Eric went a bit too easy on Terry in my opinion.. Actually, that podcast almost seemed to validate Terrance from the perspective of the average viewer

@Alejandrakoxxx

Ай бұрын

🤦‍♂

@dalaimommadrama8929

Ай бұрын

Yes because now his cult following are saying that Eric said Terry was right about everything but that he just used the incorrect verbiage/wording to describe his great theories.

@TheJamiester

18 күн бұрын

Yep Professor Dave explained that perfectly: Weinstein is just there farming clicks. He doesn’t want to alienate the lunatics.

The privilege of the rich and wealthy is that even their frivolous ideas get SO MUCH attention! If a coffee king from Starbucks wants to run for president, he gets interviewed by every single mainstream show.

While Terrence Howard's theories may be largely inaccurate, they have had a positive effect by sparking interest in scientific research among individuals who might not have otherwise engaged with the subject. This increased curiosity is directing people toward experts who can provide accurate information, which is a beneficial development. Additionally, I admire Terrence Howard’s exceptional communication skills and impressive memory. His passion for science is inspiring more individuals to explore scientific principles and theories. This newfound interest could potentially lead to more people pursuing careers in science, contributing to scientific research, or simply gaining a deeper understanding of the world around them.

@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523

Ай бұрын

The only thing that this whole charade is reveling is the failure of our education system.

@onlyonewhyphy

Ай бұрын

​@@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523it's worse than that. People openly interested, in general are typically against societal norms and need to be ok with that. Most aren't. Especially in this new Turbo-Vapid world.

@ajR_tv

Ай бұрын

I agree, but then you have Elitists and their colleagues that step out of their protected domes to label you crazy and stupid, even though they themselves have no idea what gravity even is. It's quite hilarious to watch these so called 'educated' people act just as stupid as the people they label.

@NikoAmeristar

Ай бұрын

Is Albert Einstein's theory accurate?

@ajR_tv

Ай бұрын

@@NikoAmeristar It's accurate to what we can see in our macro scale, that's about it, nothing more.

I think the fact that he calls it Terryology is a big red flag. Is any form of science named after its pioneering researcher?

@Jose-kv4uh

Ай бұрын

what should be the name of it ?

@koreycain7263

Ай бұрын

@@Jose-kv4uhnothing it’s BS 😂

@koreycain7263

Ай бұрын

The sun didn’t spit out planets😂

Eric handled that conversation like a scholar and a gentleman and I think a friendship was born. If nothing else Terrence should be praised for thinking so differently. Being wrong is an important part of science and he shouldn't be ridiculed.

@fredflintstone8048

Ай бұрын

Eric pointed out that Terrence needed to stop talking like a teacher. Terrence wants to be a guru, looked up to. Looking at how he argues his points we can see a very large ego at work here. He also applies an age old trick of deflecting questions about his assertions with questions putting the burden on the person asking him the question. Those questions are not only deflections, they're red herrings changing the subject. example: "Doesn't multiply mean make more of?"

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

@@fredflintstone8048 Also until the recent JRE appearance TH never said 1x1=2 was “metaphorical”. In his proof he actually ended by saying the education system needs to be updated to now say that 1x1=2. He repeated this last year at the Oxford Union address. He finally learned how to multiply and is now backtracking. An egotistical narcissist of the highest order!

@ethanwilliam9944

Ай бұрын

@@fredflintstone8048 I just don't understand all the animosity. I'm not saying he's right or wrong. He had many more claims aside from 1x1 and some should be explored. All I'm saying is, and this especially applies to those that consider themselves scholarly, there's no need to shoot him down with malice and hate. Just simply prove why he's wrong. Eric corrected him with class and more should follow his lead on that. I'm not going to even get into the subject of peer review as Eric accurately pointed out the major flaws in the process. I am looking forward to Eric and Brian's discussion on Terrance. If nothing else, Terrence has us talking science and questioning things, (with the exception of the 1x1 ) that's always a good thing for science as a whole.

@SisypheanRoller

Ай бұрын

​@@scooterjackalCan we please stop calling literally everyone a narcissist? It's making the word completely useless in the vernacular.

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

@@SisypheanRoller Definition for narcissist: “Personality qualities include thinking very highly of oneself, needing admiration, believing others are inferior and lacking empathy for others.” TH pretty much ticks all those boxes. I can’t be blamed if others are using the word incorrectly.

"Supersymmetry (SUSY): A theoretical symmetry between fermions and bosons that extends the Standard Model of particle physics. Despite extensive searches, no supersymmetric particles have been observed. Therefore, the term is not reserved and Terrence has every right to claim it as an accurate description and identity for his geometric proofs and patents for same Super-symmetrical Systems."

He is bring more attention to science than any 100 Phd's. You guys should love him!

@inblackamericaradio5409

Ай бұрын

@@Greg1g7126 that part

Next suggested video after I finished this one: "Remember this dog? He's famous now". And that sums it up, kids. We're living in weird times.

Didn't the Bees invent the HoneyComb Structure before Terrence!? 🍯🐝🍈

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

but they didn't PaTeNt it!!!!

@fredflintstone8048

Ай бұрын

Yes, but Terrence was the first one to try and get a patent. The bees didn't bother with that.

@wendyg8536

Ай бұрын

...and Bees function intrinsically with the electromagnetic field ..so to say that the Seed of life ordering is not relative to the field, has to be bogus....or all bees and their Queens are phony.

@JakeWitmer

Ай бұрын

They bee geniuses! 😂

@prometheus6474

Ай бұрын

Son of a bee

Terrence has said he knows 1 x 1=1 but when you associate multiplication there isn't anything multiplied in the real world where the result is 1.

@chriss4432

Ай бұрын

We all know that a something times a something = something else. But 1 of something is still 1 of that something. He hasn't spotted something new. He doesn't understand numeracy.. you want to trust him on math?

@DaDgLObElolL

Ай бұрын

the result is me and you marked with the 1 and thats mine too but you steal and care less so by all means. I owed you everything, nothing all the middle and 1. and zero and void and its no striaght lines just concentric. arks.

@ichigokurosaki2838

Ай бұрын

​@@chriss4432 But he does because he literally said he knows 1 x 1 = 1. Just in nature, nothing happens like that.

@chriss4432

Ай бұрын

@@ichigokurosaki2838 he knows now! Can you imagine how many people have laughed at him. Nature and the relation between how many of something.. you don't even get it.. ffs..

Here we are in 2024 with world renowned scientists proving what 1x1 equals....🤦‍♂️

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

No hope for postmodern society's stupity.

@FishermensCorner

Ай бұрын

That should always happen. It should never become "religion."

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

@@FishermensCorner agreed upon definitions shouldn't be questioned when they're used as tools to advance things. That is just counter-productive.

@hikelfin5941

Ай бұрын

@@Ruktiet we don't live in a "post modern" society, stop drinking conservative tabloid cum.

@oskarskalski2982

Ай бұрын

Just like in the movie "idiocracy";).

Did he, or did he not, say that 1 x 1 = 2 is a metaphor? The answer is in this video around the 17 minute mark. Specifically, in his conversation with Rogan and Weinstein, he said that he doesn’t believe in mathematics that doesn’t have a representation in the real physical world. He also said that when you multiply something by something else, there’s always a reaction. This means that you can’t multiply two things together and get the same thing you started with. It’s not hard to follow his logic. He didn’t literally say that 1×1 = 2, he’s using it as an example to make a point. The fact that you don’t realize that surprises me. Stop taking him so literally and understand that he’s a brilliant guy with a different way of thinking, and as Eric pointed out on the podcast, he hasn’t had a traditional education, so he doesn’t know how to describe what he believes to people with traditional educations. That doesn’t mean he’s crazy, it means that you may not be able to understand what he’s trying to say. Now, that doesn’t mean that I think everything he says is true, he certainly may be wrong about many things, but he is also clearly brilliant, and has some great ideas, maybe even some groundbreaking ideas. That is what Eric also said at the end of the podcast.

@paulmuriithi9195

Ай бұрын

@IntuitiveIQ torrence is wrong, problem is he knows it and also knows people cannot robustly debunk him. Math is a numerical representation of field lattice symmetritism. Symmetry breaks and convergence bring forth particles. Because of this,torrence is wrong. Sorry

@2muchtime26

Ай бұрын

Thank you for this... after seeing many reviews and comments on his stuff everyone gets hung up on the 1x1=2 thing when he clearly states it was a metaphor meant to get attention. Can't attest to whether or not Terrance is right but I've felt for a long time that mathematics has to be flawed or misunderstood if we constantly have to make exceptions in it to make it work.

@Alejandrakoxxx

Ай бұрын

bro, please study

@ioanvladescu5987

Ай бұрын

Just because he's good at word salads does not make him brilliant. He's brilliant to someone who doesn't know anything about the topics, yes. He's brilliant to simple folk who are against the system, whatever that means, and just want to stick it to "the man". He's anti establishment, and this has become somewhat of a ticket to fame and success if you're extreme enough. I don't think he's bs-ing, but it shows that he has no educated people in his antourage, because any one of them would have told him in the years he spent dedicated to building his worldview that he's flat out wrong and what he's saying makes no sense. I admire Eric for trying to be polite to the guy, but the truth is that he has no theory of anything. It's just word salad. I can pick any inflamatory statement, like : light does not exist, the photon does not exist and start scrambling random stuff about scientific discoveries to arrive to the "ah, you see?" a couple of times and I'm suddenly a genius. Flat earthers also use very "scientific" vocabulary in defending their position, or so it would seem if you know nothing about science. That doesn't mean the Earth is flat. I agree that you don't have to be tenured to be permitted to speak, but when you're trying to articulate your worldview at least learn the basic vocabulary of science, because otherwise nobody will understand you. And that's the issue here, that even if he lacks "traditional education", if he took half the time invested in his whacky ideas to learn some scientific vocabulary, he'd soon realise his theory isn't a theory because it doesn't predict anything, it doesn't explain anything and it's impossible to falsify. His claim regarding 1x2=2 is not a metaphor, he actually doesn't "belive" in, as you say, mathematics with no representation in the real world. And I kind of get that point, because there is this "debate" in physics regarding math, if it's invented or discovered. Terry would probably say it's discovered, but the reality is that it's a mix of both. Math is in part natural and in some capacity is probably universal (if we ever meet aliens, math will probably be the language of communication) but certainly parts of it are invented, because it's a language. 1x1=2 is part of that language. The number "i" is also part of that language, and both have uses. For a guy who talks so much about everything being geometry and no straight line existing, I'm surprised he's so stupid that he doesn't understand why square root of -1 is fundamental to his own "view". There's nothing groundbreaking, profound, great or even logical in his thinking. I'm tired of people like him receiving so much attention, especially a guy like him who's already famous (I can understand for a nobody trying to use it like a quick ticket to fame), while lots of important and real discussions have no change of ever being in the spotlight, like the fact that gravity is in fact a biproduct of yo mamma.

@tsunami6082

Ай бұрын

p x q means that there are p number of q. Howard refusing to accept that a single word can have more than a single use - such that he believes that the word multiply can only be used to mean to increase - is the essence of his ignorance. Words are not platonically pre-defined absolutes. They are defined by their use. in this instance the word is being used such that 1 x 1 means 1 of 1. To be fair, in my experience people commonly say 1 times 1 which is even more clearly 1 of 1.

Time to re-open mental wards.

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

Believe me there are a lot of them out there!! I’ve been arguing with TH supporters. It’s like they joined a cult where fanciful thinking is encouraged and critical thinking is shunned.

Terrance would not know how to do this prove. He is too lazy to take a class.

Lol...😂 People are so jealous because a guy with none of your fancy credentials has challenged the bigger science communities 😜

I am not surprised when people are fooled by bad science, because 99% of people cannot understand the 3 doors puzzle.

@scottboyd3838

25 күн бұрын

What da hell isthe 3 Door Puzzle??

@scottboyd3838

25 күн бұрын

Jkjk

@mrcleanisin

25 күн бұрын

GOOGLE it.

Hopefully, no one really thinks T.H is a modern-day genius.

@Spawn303

Ай бұрын

Giordano Bruno was executed by the Catholic Church in 1600 for supporting the Copernican theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun…

@Doob3i

Ай бұрын

He may or may not be a genius. The issue is his lack of detailed understanding of traditional science. If you want to expand on or break rules you need to understand the current rules or laws in depth. He thinks differently which is great but needs to understand the current proven laws and rules in order to expand on our change.

The fact that people can't decide whether Howard's nonsensical ramblings hold any truth speaks volumes about the world we live in.

Most of the dumbest people I’ve worked with had phds

@geaninatudose4063

Ай бұрын

@@shaundiltz5821 yes, right, name them.

@apophisxo4480

Ай бұрын

Where do you work???? It may be your field or the type of job you're in. There are a few possibilities. 1) You work for an organization that requires PhD's. 2) You work for an organization which requires PhD's unnecessarily (in that intelligence is not required to do the work). 3) The PhD's you are exposed to were not gained through work in fields of study that are considered rigorous (ie basket weaving, although just about anything can become complex if you look deeply enough into it). Let's just say non STEM. 4) It could be that your definition of dumb is not mainstream, maybe you mean awkward or lacking street smarts. 5) You might be exaggerating or flat out lying. 6) You may just be an internet troll / asshole.

@ak47ava

Ай бұрын

@@gwt123 lol what you just name social science phds. These aren't stem phds. Lmfao

@ivant5054

Ай бұрын

PhD in bullshitology doesn't count, cmooon, you can at least invent some fake data in economics or behavioral studies... but sociology and the like are just completely made up, it's an insult to even be in the same sentence with engineering, mathematics, physics, chemistry

@kricketflyd111

Ай бұрын

Been there.

You couldn’t say Terryology without laughing 😂

Didn't Terrance say it's a metaphor?

@hadroncollider17

Ай бұрын

He said that one time in the beginning but then later on contradicted himself saying that he really believed 1x1=2

@Ryukikon

Ай бұрын

@@hadroncollider17 no he did not

@BrazaBryan

Ай бұрын

@@hadroncollider17that’s a straight up lie lol

@fredflintstone8048

Ай бұрын

Yes he has said that, but he doesn't explain the metaphor. He jumps to the simplistic argument of the semantics of the term, 'multiply' asking the question, 'doesn't multiply mean make more of something?'' I.E 'Go forth and multiply'. He also misapplies multiplication by multiplying one apple with one apple, and one dollar with one dollar'. He also made a claim that multiplying by zero gives you one of something. As Eric pointed out Terrence had some cool ideas about the flower of life in a 3d model, but in truth, Terrence is all over the map with his associations.

@warrioromarzthefirst5949

Ай бұрын

​@Ryukikon yes he did. He stated it clear.

Terrence Howard is legit. He's legitimately INSANE !

Thanks to Brian for packaging his argument.👌

@DrBrianKeating

14 күн бұрын

You bet!

Wow! Why go to such lengths to prove him wrong. Why not just say so and leave it at that? If a homeless man on the street were saying these things there would be no debate.

@safeysmith6720

Ай бұрын

Because it’s misinformation.

@gorbalsboy

Ай бұрын

Because he has a huge audience,fame, appearance on Rogan which means the public will attribute meaning and therefore belief in what he is claiming it also is a good example in fact checking,hope that helps,all the best from sunny troon Scotland 😊

I wonder if Einstein started every speech by enumerating his PhDs.

@Drewdrewdrewdr

Ай бұрын

Can anyone give a source where he claims to have a phd from usc? I heard in the Oxford thing he referred to a partner of his as “another doctor”, implying I think that he is one, but that’s all I’ve found

@HughTube-ni6kb

Ай бұрын

If, as here, it were relivant to the foundations of his argument, yes.

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

Einstein didn't have to list his credentials,, Dr K. is a contemporary heavyweight who's still building his public name... I think he's giving his resume to contrast with the completely unlettered Terrence Howard,, and to set his mark before part 2 where he discusses the GENUINE heavyweight Eric Weinstein...

When you look up the history of who created the definition of multiplying any number by 1 preserves its identity, not change the value and why this 'special case' was created. You will NOT FIND AN ANSWER.

I have not watched the video you post, but I have watched the whole first and second podcast with Terrance Howard, counting every word of them, to know that there we no bombs dropped. Eric was trying to mentor Terrance into the landscape of academic (not exactly) corruption and how to pass his ingenuity across so he is more understood and less ridiculed. But didn't see it all as dropping bombs, it rather kind, and pure pleasure to watch.

@bleacherz7503

Ай бұрын

Terrance is. 99.999 crack pot

Dracula Keating!

@mikebar42

Ай бұрын

🧛💭 Blah! Hahaha

@wetguavass

Ай бұрын

uses hair dye

@Gil2727

Ай бұрын

Eddie Munster vibe 100%

Terrence does have a number of granted patents under the name T. Dashon Howard or variations. I found 45 patent publications dating back to 2013 on Justicia. 11 are patent applications, 23 are Design Patents (really just patenting shapes represented by drawings, with a separate patent for each shape), and 11 are granted patents that are not Design Patents. Two are for what amounts to a gun where the explosion is from an electric arc causing gas expansion, rather than gunpowder ignition. The others are for structures such as Lynchpin as a framework for a drone and the building blocks of various shapes, covering some of the materials that they could be made from and suggesting some of their applications. I don't know how he gets to 97, but it's clear from his interviews that he's including the applications, and probably counting both the application and the grant in his total. There is still no demonstration that any of these really solve any fundamental problem, as cool as it may be to look at a lamp made from geometric shapes or fly a drone that can spin in any direction. The Lynchpin patent covers motion through the ground in addition to water or air (quite an engineering challenge). Other companies citing his patents or applications are just acknowledging his prior art, patented or not, in their due diligence. Microsoft or whoever then has to convince the patent examiner that their invention is substantially different and novel.

@em-dy3hn

Ай бұрын

A patent holds no proof int he quality of an idea.

@Foodstamp_Plug

Ай бұрын

@@veveysan things a hater would say for $500 pls.

@monraie

Ай бұрын

​@@Foodstamp_Pluga "hater"? Do you think people here discuss a basketball game or something?

@bobbyd5167

Ай бұрын

@@em-dy3hn Quality?

@bobbyd5167

Ай бұрын

@@monraiePeople here? Can you please make sense? And why the basketball reference? Your comment was almost as dragged out as the podcast and taught nobody here anything😴

Eric said he has something going in geometry. Geometry is hard. He would not go pass the first prove you have to do in a geometry class.

I feel he can do without the “headphones over the hoodie” little jokey jokes…- I 10000 percent agree with everything he’s saying… But I mean… headphones make your ears sweat I put my hoodie on so it doesn’t suffocate my ear… idk.. but you’re better than that doc.

I don't think i have heard where Terrence acknowledged that atoms have no electrons.

Did Howard actually claim expertise in these fields, I don't think he did.

@tsunami6082

Ай бұрын

Assuming that it is his belief that he has no expertise - why is he explaining theories that contradict the theories of the world's leading mathematicians and scientists? Does this not imply that he regards himself as superior by virtue of the 'fact' that he has arrived at deeper truths?

@benorozco3156

17 күн бұрын

@@tsunami6082 that's the difference I'm not assuming, but if I were to grant you your assumption. Why can't he do that, and why are these academics clutching their pearls and shrieking in response. I don't know about his theory as a whole, but his idea about the negative spaces within the flower of life looks interesting, and how people are using what he said to make drones that can fly suspiciously like that tic tac UFO.

Eric Weinstein was totally correct when he warned Terrence, Re: what you're doing,... "I want you to think legitimately of what you are doing as a drug, OK, if you are not very careful with the mathematics you're playing with, you are going to get so high that you see everything connect to everything...the concern I have, to be totally honest, is that you have to get disciplined about this as a drug because otherwise, you're going to see everything in everything all the time and you're going to be having the same repetitive conversations where people don't take you seriously because (blackjack reference here) you keep hitting on 19." . Dunning-Kruger effect Indeed!

@inblackamericaradio5409

Ай бұрын

Eric sounds like the guy who will pat you on the head and make you feel wrong, meanwhile stealing your concept and sharing it with his friends as his own. It sounds like Terrence is in the ball field of what’s going on and either the gatekeepers don’t know or don’t want it known. Truth needs no explanation so it will always come out eventually

Something has got Tyson and Green excited. Each petal on the flower of life is a new space/time generated by a geometry at the centre of a new viewer and creator of the continuous reality; and inside each petal a never ending fractal.

Galileo is a hero now but back then, He was treated exactly like Terrence is treated today. They just want him to shut up.

@travisbickle9357

Ай бұрын

Get out the tin foil hat.

@user-pw6gm1tu6q

Ай бұрын

that doesnt make him right though,he sees that example and it just feeds his delusion that one day he'll be accepted like Galileo and i dont understand how u cant see that flaw in your argument

@user-ln7tj5wf2z

Ай бұрын

@@joecolon8327 anyone ever read king James demonology book lol it's where we get the term psychology. It explains why we kill are prophets like Galileo,Jesus, and Tupac 😉. CERN knows what Shiva is and God open Shiva as female and dropped a atom bomb lol the elite/alien/illuminati/elite/angels don't want us knowing or believing anything because the gig will be up

@apophisxo4480

Ай бұрын

Well, you're right about the "shut up" part.....

@Thefamilychannel723

Ай бұрын

You are right, yet that does not mean Terrence is right. What I agree with is that the ego of a lot of people come in the way of them genuinely looking at what makes sense in what Terrence says or even trying to understand what he is saying. Let's not forget that Terrence, just like Michael Faraday, is an autodidact, a self educated person.

Physics breaks down in the quantum realm. The Big Bang Theory has so many exceptions that occur nowhere else in the universe. Euclidean geometry has exceptions. 2D math to describe a 3D world doesn’t make much sense to begin with logically. All of the great breakthroughs in science were preceded by resistance and ridicule. To the point where careers have been ruined to find out later they were right all along. I’m not saying Terrance is right or wrong but at least he has the balls to keep what science is all about alive. People are talking about math and science more than ever before. Terrance might not change history but maybe he inspired someone else who will. Ego has no business in science but yet it prevails everywhere. The knowledge gatekeepers pretend they know everything while we know nothing about the universe isn’t helping anyone

@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu

Ай бұрын

Good point. Multiplication (times) means that something occurs (n) times, therefore 1*1=1 because 1 occurs 1 times. Also, when you multiply by zero, you are saying this thing occurs zero times, when you divide by zero, you are saying there is infinite times a zero can fit into the number, which is true because zero doesn't have a value that can divide against the number on top a finite amount of times. Also (Eric is somehow not able to explain this simple point, and continues to try to sound smart, instead of giving the right answer). The big thing that Terrence said that we will likely discover to be a profound truth is that (something comes in, then something goes out), we will likely find this to be a fundamentally true aspect of the Universe and energy conservation. Also, science is not a community, it is a method, full stop. You can't redefine science to fit your agenda, or to stone wall critics of your theories, science is not a enclave of privileged pampered fools, it is simply a method, full stop.

@seanharris2188

Ай бұрын

@@christupper0 I respect your point of view and I agree with you 100 %. At least he approached science humbly. I haven’t heard him say he knows everything, yet Eric who is human as well is dismissive and rude. And he didn’t provide any tangible proof to dispute Terrance.

@tsunami6082

Ай бұрын

@@seanharris2188 Do you need someone to prove to you that one of something is not two of something? I refuse to consider anything someone has to say once I am made aware that they can't calculate 1 x 1. The opinions of morons are not worth my time.

@BobsUruncle-dl7cs

Ай бұрын

Hes right, the Philosophers Stone was transmutation in the Coles Notes version...c-51 nanotubes grafted to our telomeres.

@seanharris2188

Ай бұрын

@@tsunami6082 he said that was a metaphor 20 times. Anyone who believes in God knows that we don’t know everything. And if 1x1 isn’t 2. He not going to he’ll be hind it so let him “COOK”. See what he chefs up, you don’t have to eat it moron. Knowledge doesn’t belong to any one person and none of you self righteous ppl who pretend to know it all, Can explain how we exist so pray for wisdom , not on me cuz I don’t lean on my own understanding! And Im not as polite as Terrence.

Calling him war machine is amazing lmao

You are not telling the truth about Howard's abandoned patent application. The rejection was not based on prior art, but correctable grammatical errors. I have no idea why his attorney didn't not make the corrections, but the non-final rejection was not based on technical issues.

Eric and Joe should take this show on the road...go to some homeless camps and bus terminals...there's an unlimited well of crazy they can mine for future episodes!

Mumbo-Jumbo...word spagetti....Thats about it.

@wetguavass

Ай бұрын

mondongo

It’s a excellent caution against well read, yet highly assumptiveness departures. Mr. Weinstein was very good with Terrance. But, Terrance is just guessing up the ‘Woo-Woo’ stuff. That I’d be *embarrassed* to repeat to anyone. And, to hell with his silly patents. 😐

@state_of_the_Art712

Ай бұрын

that sucks, your entire world is going to turn woo-woo' very soon

@kahlrhoam6769

Ай бұрын

@@state_of_the_Art712; 😆

Did you just tell me that your equations are exact, then give me a number with a 14 digit decimal placement and an uncertainty of (2)? Its really a shame that everyone is so closed minded and just wants to shut Terrance down. He should stop trying to show us anything. People never hear you.

He's making artistic, associative assumptions, really lovely man, but he has to learn a lot ;) Eric Weinstein was 10000% right about the whole "peer review" debacle though. Well made video Brian, Cheers!

@DrBrianKeating

Ай бұрын

Interesting!

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

Yeah but peer review is peer review,, a construction workers peers usually know if you can do a good job or not just if you know how to describe it,, same with auto mechanics or whatever discipline and Eric is an ivy League drama queen who can't resist flexing his credentials LOL but THEY ARE valid credentials,, and I enjoyed the rundown where he calmly told Terrence that he, Eric, had just given Terrence a genuine peer review that other genuine mathematicians in the field would KILL to get, and then saying you're welcome LOL... AND TERRENCE STILL try to flex with those ridiculous patents and came back to his misinterpretation of the word multiply and Eric just gave up...

@3D_TUTS

Ай бұрын

@@micnorton9487 I'm not saying that peer review isn't necessary, I'm just pointing out the significant gatekeeping within the scientific community. It often resembles 'scientism', an almost religious and dogmatic perspective on everything. The Covid era opened a can of worms for me. A PHD means nothing if you can't discern the basic truth from the current political climate. I appreciate how honest Eric is, he's undoubtedly a brilliant man not afraid to speak his mind. On the other hand, Terrence's logic is deeply flawed and often absurd. The mere fact that the interview went viral is strange. However I respect Eric immensely for his approach to Terrence. Any smart 18 year old could easily debunk Terrence's claims, but Eric tried to find common ground and understand what Terrence was trying to convey. But yeah, Terrence's rigidity and overconfidence immensely hurt his position, and his constant 'teaching' was indeed incredibly annoying. Honestly, NDT's video was so well made, he was honest and precise. but you know, calling someone a victim of the 'Dunning Kruger effect' is offensive. While it may be true and evident, it's still deeply insulting to a common man, it's like saying, 'oh, your IQ is too low' or something like that.. But yeah, there's no place for FEELINGS in science. ;D English isn't my native language, I hope you get what I'm trying to say.

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

@@3D_TUTS You explained it perfectly,, and I agree... to be fair Neil SHOULD have said that EVERYONE has the dunning-kruger effect to some degree, most handle it well because their ego is in check... And I see what you mean about the "Ivory tower" nature of contemporary high science but the problem is,, and I'm not arguing because I'm sure you'll agree,, that Terry tried coming in at the TOP of the art math discipline when he doesn't have any credentials or any real talking points...... It's all delusional manic talking points about having the key to everything that on the one hand has actual mathematical professionals making highly technical videos knocking Terry's delusions off one by one,, and on the other hand has gullible members of the public flocking over to conspiracy theories and looking for an easy answer to everything... I said before Eric is an ivy league drama queen who can't resist flexing his weighty credentials but THEY ARE valid credentials,, I think Eric is far too taken with his own brilliance and apparently thinks that solving string theory will keep society from collapsing...... I don't know exactly how he thinks that,, the current conflicts over both Ukraine and Taiwan could go nuclear at both ends of the planet at any second and people aren't aware of it but Eric IS ... And the other global problems of global warming and other issues aren't related to art math so I don't see how he claims that high science is being so underfunded but I guess he's the expert... So the main problem the world has to face is either the world coming around to Wall Street's cutthroat capitalism and accepting constant wars into forever, or the world learns how to socially live with each other and then high science can take a Great leap Forward because there will not be any money spent on weapons and ALL industrial Capital can go to uplifting humanity... I'm not familiar with Eric's problem with Fauci and the government's handling of covid,, personally I think it was a real disease and is a real disease and I'm sure Eric isn't pushing the conspiracy theories about it BUT I also noticed that the death count was vastly overestimated, at one point everybody who died of anything was being called a covid death... I sort of understand why the government would employ scare tactics like that but they should have known that they would get a huge backlash from people who know the truth....

Eric might be leading the way for humanity. imagine people & country's actually sat down & had a dialogue with each other. Even if what they talk about is incorrect, there's no harm in listening & much benefits in trying to teach someone. Well done Eric, humanity can learn many listens from you giving a fellow human the time to listen. how much better could the world be if everyone had a heart like Eric.

@kangkim150

Ай бұрын

Then you don't know Eric. He had a meltdown on twitter few years ago when 2 physics students challenged his paper. Then he rage quit his successful podcast and went unhinged on Discord also. Now he pops up here and there on his friends podcasts.

@Education-x6l

Ай бұрын

​@@kangkim150can you share the title of the research from the students? And possible links?

@patheticpear2897

Ай бұрын

A guy who has been shown to be lying multiple times, has punched women in the face multiple times, yeah I am so glad he is given air time for Eric to gush about the toys he made. It would be a much better world if wife beaters were treated with a bit more heart.

@patheticpear2897

Ай бұрын

@@kangkim150 Yeah, someone who criticizes his theory is a despicable person and doesn't deserve a response, someone who punches women in the face and says 1 x 1 = 2 that is the person that deserves more time and attention.

@NuAege2302

Ай бұрын

Abuse is abuse, be it physical or mental. If you have never beaten a woman but have shout down on her or cause mental anguish, that is still abuse and people still give you the time and attention in other things. Just because yours is mental and not physical, don't make you or anyone else different or better. There's no perfect relationship with happiness only. However, life must go on in other aspects. Whether physical or mental abuse, both are wrong on equal level and both have caused people to lose their lives.

All I can say is. People thought Tesla was crazy too. Until they didn't...in the end we know he wasn't. If not for him...we would be living in the dark.

@dextermorgan1

Ай бұрын

You're correct. Terrence is probably right about a lot of this but nobody will ever actually look into it because it SOUNDS crazy. I don't think it is at all. I think he's right but Science has gone so far off the rails, they'll never test any of what Terrence is claiming.

@user-pw6gm1tu6q

Ай бұрын

@@dextermorgan1 you think hes right?please explain even a little of what u think hes right about because i dont think u understand any of it enough to make a decision about whether or not hes right about anything,your just saying u think hes right to prop up your thoughts and agenda about mainstream science,barely anybody is qualified to follow what hes on about thats why we listen to the experts like eric and they all think hes wrong and doesnt understand maths or physics like he thinks he does,there is no agenda hes just wrong

Why do people keep skipping past the fact Erik said Terrance is a genius and his Lynchpin idea is brilliant

@state_of_the_Art712

Ай бұрын

cherry-picked

Neil Degrassi Tyson 😂

@jamesmoore1482

Ай бұрын

@@AirmanRugby6 You know ... the guy they named that High School after.

@tsunami6082

Ай бұрын

Are you a racist?

Frequency of sound is a function of the medium sound propagates through, so his numbers of sound frequency is totally arbitrary and can be anything you want depending on medium through wich sound travels?

@treece1

Ай бұрын

Makes sense to me. Asking as the medium is consistent

@user-gr3dn3qp6e

Ай бұрын

Frequency remains the same, but the same sound may have different frequencies

@bjorneriksson6480

Ай бұрын

I was thinking about when you inhale helium and produce a higher pitch? It is all very confusing to be, it is not clear to me what he is taling about

Saying that someone is wrong is not attacking them. Agree with Howard or not, you colleagues weren’t attacked, they were challenged.

Terrence is the perfect example why people believe conspiracy theories even after they've been properly debunked. Terrence's ignorance is the reason people support ALL religions but especially scientology and mormonism. We have an enormous need for competent teachers and doers but we get popularities; not what you know but who you know. My good friend considers himself an astrophysicist but has ZERO physics background, he has a music degree. We've had 100s of drunk conversations about useless theories, all funny to me, BUT he is a high school principle. Rogan's show is awesome but it is ENTERTAINMENT and many times he has hacks on that gain HUGE credence and popularity after the show. There are no scientific or technologies in the pyramids that we haven't figured out but that doesn't stop people searching for aliens or worse. Terrance, stick to the arts.

Why didn't anyone ask him, "Then what is 1x2? 3? also 2?" Then ask him if you have 1 group of 3 cats how many cats do you have? How about 1 group of 2 cats? Now how about 1 group of 1 cat? (Answer - Zero That cat thinks you're nuts and ran away.)

@maxwellsmart0099

Ай бұрын

Can 1 cat be considered a group

@maxwellsmart0099

Ай бұрын

It's seems like in multiplication 1 is the problem when multiplying it you itself, that would be the me, my self and I conceptions myself. That's a problem

@civwar64bob77

Ай бұрын

@@maxwellsmart0099 LOL yes. I'm using the everyday word 'group' instead of the math term 'set'. You can have a set with 1 thing in it. And a set with nothing in it is called the empty set. So 1 group of 0 cats equals 0 cats. (Of course, the ancient greeks did not like 0 because how could your have something mean nothing, Such is progress.)

@maxwellsmart0099

Ай бұрын

@@civwar64bob77 a group is defined by more than 1

@civwar64bob77

Ай бұрын

@@maxwellsmart0099 My point wasn't about the actual word group. Use box instead if you prefer. 1 box with 3 cats, then 2 cats, then1 cat.

How can we be rigorous without debate? Are we not obligated to argue points to suss out truths? With respect, were the experts not touting their bonafides and using that authority to denounce Galileo, Copernicus (sp?) and Einstein?

@rogerforsman5064

Ай бұрын

Galileo, Copernicus and Einstein was proven correct by experimental confirmations of predictions from the models not via podcasts!

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

Incomparable situation; these people had actual ideas that could be written down in a way that people would understand what their hypothesis were. That is not the case for the semantically incomputable schizoid ramblings that came out of Terrence Howard's mouth and fingers.

@Mr.PeabodyTheSkeptic

Ай бұрын

Should serious scientific inquiry be debating the existence of pink unicorns, the flat earth and 'wave conjugations'? Seriously?

@wendyg8536

Ай бұрын

The fact that Einstein had an open book of Velikovsky on his desk on passing, and was good friends with, is enough to say that even the experts are inspired by far out theories.

@ethanellis465

Ай бұрын

We can be rigorous with mathematics and experiments...

Sometimes scientific experts who think the world is flat are wrong. James Smithson the Smithsonian was named after was propped up as the most expert in aeronautics. He was actually embarrassed intellectually by two home schooled bicycle mechanics with no education outside of the home and they created the first flying machine on earth. 1x1 does not equal 2. One cannot replicate by itself though 1x1 can produce half of its original form and still be mathematically viable. Which actually looks like 1x1=2 but it’s not. It’s 1/2x1/2 since the understanding of one is split in half by the constant of one creating one in the sum of two halves. One times one is the equivalent of two halves of one. My best answer to the question. Prob wrong

I think Eric treated Terrence with a lot of respect and sympathy because even though he's not an academic he's in love with mathematics, geometry and the wonder of working things out.

If Terrance has some sort of schooling in these subject rather than Listening to layman terms off the experts and thinking he knows , he might have some respect ! I can have thoughts as well off what we all hear but will never have the math or schooling to back it up .

I have a new theory, 5x5=42. Will everyone please talk about me now? But this what America has become, a giant soapbox for utter clowns, and people are in awe. WTF!!?

@henrytep8884

Ай бұрын

You probably don’t even know why axiomatically 1x1=1.

@OBGynKenobi

Ай бұрын

@@henrytep8884 I don't have to know axioms or set theories. But I do know that multiplication is repeated addition, and that's all I need.

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

Correction… A giant soapbox for Clowns with money and celebrity!

@Trojanmachine69

Ай бұрын

@@OBGynKenobi 1x1=1 isn't repeated addition by the way lol.

@experienceofchris1108

Ай бұрын

Omygosh you are a genius and the voice of a generation!! Someone quick get this man some acting roles and get him on JRE!! 😂

The universe is electric, "the sun is a transformer! ", Eric Dollard!

Brieng Mr. Howard on your show. Allow and help him to express his ideas. Thank you, Dr. Keating.

I asked this with all due respect to everyone in the scientific community. Why do you think that Terrence Howard and his hypothesis could in anyway rival what the truth is? This backlash from the scientific community feels more like anger that someone new has gotten into your lane, then a defense of the truth.

The problem with the dunning-kruger effect is that the expert on the other side has the same confidence as the fool...

@NoToobForYou

Ай бұрын

Maybe, but is that confidence justified?

@option387

Ай бұрын

But experts have a PHD to back up their knowledge. Dunning-kruger effect is when someone has a bit of knowledge and thinks they know better than an expert.

@patheticpear2897

Ай бұрын

Did you actually look at the graph? They don't have the same confidence, it is even clearly labelled confidence gap.

@kmb_jr

Ай бұрын

@@patheticpear2897 Exactly, confidence never reaches the initial height.

When Brian showed his envy and bitterness about the watch Joe gave to Lex I knew enough about Brian. We should praise people like Terrance for his interest and effort and sure not talk down on them like Brian does.

@tsunami6082

Ай бұрын

We should praise all toddlers that learn to use the potty. Howard is an adult. He hasn't grasped that one of something is one of something yet. If we don't refrain from praising this level of stupidity, then praise will be made worthless.

You could do it easier than that. The nonsense that follows from thinking 1x1 = 2 is impossible to get away from.

Why is this guy still getting attention? If I start talking about my theory of donut earth there would be at most 2 people debating me. Let's not give people's theories more attention based on how popular they are in entertainment.

@causeyje5791

Ай бұрын

Because all information is worth listening to, even outlandish information

@redriver6541

Ай бұрын

That's not how it works. Joe Rogan is HUGE!.... People love conflict and debate. Have you watched the 6 o'clock news?

@droyal18able

Ай бұрын

Elitist.

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

@@causeyje5791 You completely went over the point of my comment. I never said that they're not worth listening to. I said that it's DISPROPORTIONAL to the rigor of their reasoning (which is completely nonexistent in the case of Terrence Howard), and only a result of his celebrity status. The only reason he's getting attention is because he's 1: a celebrity, 2: because he suggests radical reform to everything we've known, 3: because he uses big words of which he himself does not know the meaning at all, but says it with such confidence that other viewers who don't know the meaning of those words either are tricked into believing he knows what he's talking about. If you took away no. 1, this man wouldn't have the tiniest audience and would be considered just another schizoid rambling his incoherent ideas on the internet.

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

@@droyal18able my comment literally suggest the exact opposite of elitism. Unless "elitist" is your answer to my rhetorical question

Eric doesn't seem to love the periodic table

@0tedaCecapS

Ай бұрын

Eric should come up with a periodic table he approves of and let others evaluate it.

Everyone who's smart dont necessarily have to have a PhD. Two young high school kids just solved a 2000 year old math problem. Pythagorean Theorem. I think it is admirable for these 2 little black girls with not even a high school diploma yet. Just like it's fascinating to see an actor be so dam smart. There are a lot of surprisingly smart people out there. It's nice to see something positive for a change. I hope Terrence win a Noble Prize.

@tsunami6082

Ай бұрын

I'm guessing that the girls you mentioned are capable of calculating 1 x 1. Anyone that is not is a moron.

Terrance “you actually wanted to hear my argument” Weinstein: *STOP TALKING!*

@ajR_tv

Ай бұрын

No, he's simply saying to stop TEACHING. Since it is not the 'accepted' science of today. If the science is going to change course, ACADEMIA want to be the ones to do it, not some actor who figures out what they couldn't.

@quasi-human3456

Ай бұрын

@@ajR_tv 😉😉

@greyfoxblade

Ай бұрын

@@ajR_tv Isn't someone to be taught something they didn't come up with? I don't think you get it.

Howard is very vague. He says 1 x 1 = 2. So what is 2 x1 ? What is 0.5 x 1? Does he accept the rest of established arithmetic whereby he believes that (1 x 1) = (2 x 1) ? Can he provide a definition for 'multiplied by' such that 1 x 1 = 2 and 2 x 1 = 2 and 3 x 1 = 3 etc follow from the definition? Or does he claim that 2 x 1 = 4? What would he make of (1 x 1) + (1 x 1) = (2 x 1)? 1 x 1 is 1of 1 just as 2 x 1 is 2 of 1. Such is a tautology: If I have 1 x apples then how many apples do I have? Howard claims that if he has 1 x apples then he has 2 apples! Whereby, if Howard has 1 apple then Howard has 2 apples such that 1 = 2 !!! Not only is his assertion absurd, it leaves all these questions unanswered whilst providing zero proof. The man is an idiot. Why would anyone bother to consider any other theories of a person incapable of solving something as simple as 1 x 1? All anyone needs to know about Terrence Howard is that he lacks sufficient intelligence to solve 1 x 1. On top of which, after getting the answer wrong his narcissism was so extreme that he has been unable to admit that he was wrong to the present day!

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

🎯🎯🎯 Terrence is truly delusional,, to take a dumb calculator trick along with some stoned out rambling about the function of multiplication,, to then cram a few terms and references and wow gullible audiences like The View and Oxford lol, that's one thing... It's celebrity bull crap and I didn't pay attention at the time but then this Rogan thing came along, with Terry really for the first time in his life gaining worldwide attention, the man is truly delusional to think he could come in front of an actual mathematics heavyweight and Eric Weinstein was just going to go wow Terrence you've changed the world... Eric was INCREDIBLY gentle with Terrence,, when Joe brought up Terrence's sun pooping out planets theory Eric just politely said I don't want to go there with an indulgent grin... Terrence is suffering from delusions and it looked like Eric was actually impressed with his mathematics knowledge, I think until the end when Terrence kept insisting on flexing his stupid patents and not recognizing any of the art math equations Eric was bringing out so Eric just basically ended the show ,, shaking Terrance's hand and saying see ya round...

Imagine what Israel did to the Palestinians when we couldn't see their crimes on our phones. That's science.

Why don't you get Terrence on your channel so you can discuss all this face to face, rather then doing it this way?

@DrBrianKeating

Ай бұрын

I’ve extended an invitation we shall see

@salmon8765

Ай бұрын

@@DrBrianKeating that's great! Can't wait to watch you two discuss all this in a civilized way. 👍

I’ve seen people like this… folks that with no physics degree or chemistry degree think they know everything about everything. If you think about it… it’s like a strange narcissistic personality disorder. Somehow he read some obscure Walter Russel stuff and some other things and put it all together in his head and thinks he’s right. Lol. People who are convinced they are right are just funny to me. He probably thinks he’s god or some special being to… watch he will

@Ruktiet

Ай бұрын

Are you saying he is wrong about waking up in his mother's womb, discovering "his theories" and telling himself he needs to remember it for after when he's born??!? lol

@state_of_the_Art712

Ай бұрын

credenal-ism is dead, lots of people with those fancy papers doesn't mean anything, and in-fact a lot of these people are dumber than rocks...it only shows they appealed to the Rockefeller-ian education establishment enough and wasted enough of their money to be given a so-called degree, doesnt mean they can think on their own

I think 1x1=2 should tell viewers whether or not they want to invest 4 hours watching Rogan/Howard/Weinstein thrash this topic.

@h2beezy2

Ай бұрын

I actually watched the whole thing over the course of a couple days and it was worthwhile. Mainly because Dr. Weinstein was doing most of the talking and I always find what he has to say fascinating. Towards the end it seemed like Weinstein just went into smack down Terrence Howard mode, but in a respectful, well thought out, and constructive way, that part was especially memorable.

@mmklassen

Ай бұрын

I agree. I was riveted throughout the entire discussion. While it sounded like a foreign language, the actual dialogue and care that Eric demonstrated was excellent. All around, worth every minute.

@atmospheres11

Ай бұрын

As a schoolkid I remember the teacher telling us to replace the X symbol with "of" So 5 x 5 is 5 of 5 or 1 of 1. That resolves it for me. I suspect however that TH is onto something. Remember this next statement, it will come up in the future as magnetic field theory matures 1 is to phi as phi is to 1. Not equal yet the same. Using that and using it in the following function it is possible to resolve the internal imbalance of north and south field strengths of the one magnetic moment. Though utter nonsense for now, laugh and scoff and ridicule as much as is required but now you have it in your memory for a time when it may need recalling in the hopefully near future. Magnetism is a very immature science and is not yet understood. The experiments and proofs acedemicaly put forth are based on interacting with both North and South fields sets in a way that portrays one set yet they are not.

@alleneverhart4141

Ай бұрын

@@atmospheres11 "So 5 x 5 is 5 of 5 or 1 of 1." BS is BS however you want to say it. Nothing useful will ever come "of" it.

Terrence Howard is nuts. Not sure if he's manic or on drugs but bro has lost it.

@micnorton9487

Ай бұрын

He's delusional,, "Terryology?" Flexing ridiculous non existent patents as proof of something? He's got a strange fixation on being right,, doesn't matter what but SOMETHING and Eric just busted his azz off mathematically....

He didn't live to be "about" 92. He literally lived exactly 92 years.

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

Depends on if hours, minutes and seconds are counted 😉

Patent pending or actual patent aside, has Terrence actually applied for 97 patents? If he hasn't then he can't even be mistaken in his belief in the assertion, so would be clearly lying.

@scooterjackal

Ай бұрын

This is in fact how he has been embellishing his credentials. He has APPLIED for 97 patents. Some have been granted and some haven’t. The AR/VR patent was abandoned after he didn’t respond to questions from the patent office. But anyone can apply for a patent and applying for a patent does not mean he is right.

@gardenia3044

23 күн бұрын

And claiming he's patented mathematical formulas or scientific theories is blatantly false as these aren't things that can be patented, period.

The more people rip him apart to discredit him the more I think maybe there’s something to it on some level.

@WilliamAllnutt

Ай бұрын

That is what suckers people into every and any con, beware

@SisypheanRoller

Ай бұрын

By that same reasoning, all rejected journal submissions are actually reliable and accurate. See the problem?

@kmb_jr

Ай бұрын

The sky must be green huh?

@Alejandrakoxxx

Ай бұрын

yeah, maybe on the level that he knows absolutely nothing about physics, or math, or chemistry... or any science at all!

@ismaelbarnes2141

Ай бұрын

Terrance is self taught but if you have gone through a Masters program in science, math or engineering you realize there are specialties. The problem with Terrance he jumps to conclusions not fulling understanding the why which is why he’s not onto something bc he can’t explain how he got there. Additionally his work has not gone through peer review. Peer review has its issues which Eros discussed. Eric was very nice to Terrance like a professor is nice to an eager student.

This is a perfect example of Credentialism in our society. Even in health and diets it's the same.

Terrence Howard is used to people saying yes to him and I'm sure he thought the world would jump onboard with his delusions and praise him. 😅😅😅

"New things are crazy until they aren't," Elon Musk 🙏 Terrence Howard

@MojiWord

Ай бұрын

True🙏🏽

I'm over hearing out Terrence Howard. He's been heard, he's had his chances. He's wrong. Done.

"... all the wonderful films he'd been in" 😂. That was a good one

Eric Weinstein put on a dang master class on how to tell someone they are wrong without upsetting them!