let’s pretend it didn’t take me three weeks to post a video…

@Santiino

2 жыл бұрын

Wow already doing another video after a day 😁

@HakunaMatata-ho3mk

2 жыл бұрын

PLS DO A *BEST MOMENTS OF TAYLOR AND JACK ANTONOFF* ❤️🙏 THANKS

@HakunaMatata-ho3mk

2 жыл бұрын

Gurrrlll it's been 3 weeks once more 😓

@themastermind.13

9 ай бұрын

it’s been 1 year…. 😢

Taylor's Vocabulary: Endless Taylor Speaking:

"sonically cohesive" "sonically cohesive" "sonically cohesive" "sonically cohesive" "sonically cohesive" "sonically cohesive"

Sonically cohesive doesn't even sound normal anymore

@Cookieee3647

2 жыл бұрын

What even is “sonically cohesive” loll

@holy1199

2 жыл бұрын

@@Cookieee3647 To make an album “sonically cohesive is to make it fit together. Each song has a connection with the other, that's based on the vibe, rather than the lyrics or the emotional theme” I hope this makes sense let me know if you have further questions 🤗

@Cookieee3647

2 жыл бұрын

@@holy1199 ohh ty!

@aaliyahfoster2705

2 жыл бұрын

TS10 album title: Sonically Cohesive confirmed! Track listing leak: 1) Ummm... 2) You Guys, 3) Hi, I'm Taylor, 4) But It Doesn't Have a Head!, 5) SYDNEY, 6) Tell That Bear to Get Outta My Trashcan, 7) ME! (Explicit Version) ft. Olivia Rodrigo & Conan Gray, 8) Blue

@instantnoodles6023

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaliyahfoster2705 yes I want this

she seemed to hate Red so much after 1989 was released, glad it has changed now ✨

@dekuavatar8777

2 жыл бұрын

Wait she changed her song

@almostdo

2 жыл бұрын

i think losing album of the year affected her a lot mentally like when she was convinced rep wasn’t a good enough album after it didn’t get nominated :(

@dekuavatar8777

2 жыл бұрын

@@almostdo is it a good song

@islandrebelmakeup4653

2 жыл бұрын

I feel like she recognized its lack of sonic cohesion almost made it a concept album about the rollercoaster of emotions a heartbroken person goes through.

@randomfornow

2 жыл бұрын

She's some perfectionist oh boy

"I think for me umm," " it's sonically cohesive."

Imagine if one of the 1989 vault songs Is called ✨Sonically Cohesive✨

@relaxwalex

2 жыл бұрын

Screaming. 😂

I feel like people forget that albums don’t need to be sonically cohesive, if it’s thematically cohesive with strong lyricism then it’s a god tier album

@hajar2798

2 жыл бұрын

Yes i agree

@almostdo

2 жыл бұрын

agreed! also it captured so many different emotions and was about messy chaotic feelings so it wouldn’t have fit as well if every song sounded the same

@stevenstewart782

2 жыл бұрын

Yes say it louder.

@sharanyatammara1791

2 жыл бұрын

Cough cough..'SPEAK NOW'...cough cough,..RED..cough cough..."EVERMORE"....

@josjoererg

2 жыл бұрын

it depends on the album for me. it is doable by all means, but it's so easy to mess up albums that aren't sonically cohesive

Me whenever I learn a new word and use it in every sentence:

sonically cohesive 🤝 taylor swift

“Sonically cohesive” walked so that “there can a hundred people in a room...” could run

The Grammys seem to like her “sonically cohesive” albums (fearless, 1989, folklore) more than albums like Red and Lover

@hugo6390

2 жыл бұрын

What about rep💔

@like_euphoria

2 жыл бұрын

@@hugo6390 I actually think Reputation could be sonically cohesive if the songs were put in an order. Like it could go from the guilt of moving away from her rebound partner (Getaway Car) to thinking about how people were doubting her (Delicate) and then calling them out (LWYMMD and IDSB) then her relation with Joe about how she was mesmerized by him (Gorgeous) and then her bragging about her partner (…Ready for it?, Endgame, KOMH). Then comes the sexual tension part (Dress, So it Goes, Don’t Blame Me, DWOHT) later comes the part where she rejoices and shades the people who doubted her (TIWWCHNT) then calming down, talking and chilling with her lover (CIWYW, New Years Day)

I love how Harry styles just tells me to subscribe, it's hilarious

@janvipatel13

2 жыл бұрын

It’s funny how most of the songs on 1989 are rumoured to be about Harry. “It’s sonically cohesive.” ❤️😹

@randomfornow

2 жыл бұрын

@@janvipatel13 😅

Sonically Cohesive Sonically Cohesive Sonically Cohesive Sonically Cohesive Sonically Cohesive

s o n i c a l l y c o h e s i v e

@diorglaze3953

2 жыл бұрын

sonically cohesive

@sparkle1336

2 жыл бұрын

Sonically Cohesive

@StateOfTaylor13

2 жыл бұрын

Sonically Cohesive

@wolfthing13

2 жыл бұрын

Sonically Cohesive

@silverspoons_chloe

2 жыл бұрын

Sonically Cohesive

That time she thought 1989 was the album of her career...then 5 years later she made folklore! I wonder if she thinks about that

@luc1jana

2 жыл бұрын

fr

@lucaspina7563

2 жыл бұрын

I'm a HUGE 1989 stan, but she probably thought that 1989 was her best album only when she released it. I think that now it's one of her least favorites because she was not so happy during that time. She also seems to appreciate red a lot now... I personally love 1989 more and it's still my favorite album because it had a huge impact on my life. I don't know where I would've ended up if it wasn't for 1989. That album saved my life so many times, and that's why I love it so much. I know that so many people think that red and Speak Now are actually better, but I can't stop loving 1989 because I saw that it literally helped so many people that struggled with depression, anxiety or diseases. I love seeing little girls and boys dancing to shake it off, bacause I know the feeling and I know that they're having fun

@Aviethebest

2 жыл бұрын

@@lucaspina7563 She doesn't regret the most awrded pop album cuz she had the ed back then lol. And she was happy, i just hate this narrative that fans keep on perpuating.. So she hates even Lover cuz she was not that happy due to her mother and the masters drama, right?

@lucaspina7563

2 жыл бұрын

@@Aviethebest maybe you're right... Just hearing her talking about that era in her documentary made me think. But she surely doesn't hate the album. Actually I fanally found someone who thinks in that way. Swifties always hate on 1989 and it's still my favorite

Sonically cohesive is the new I think for me umm

@luc1jana

2 жыл бұрын

true

I'm just gonna go Google sonically cohesive

@janvipatel13

2 жыл бұрын

Do share the Google meaning. 🤣🧣❤️

@like_euphoria

2 жыл бұрын

@@janvipatel13 apparently, it’s an album term. It’s like each song should be directly or indirectly connected to each other, whether the vibe, lyric, emotion etc. for example:- a direct connection song pair is there in Folklore itself, August x Betty x Cardigan (Songs about perspective of James and Betty, with Inez being the added character). The whole vibe of Folklore is similar, the forest, misty vibe. So is it for evermore. I think that’s the indirect connection. That’s what sonically cohesive means I guess

@dnclzd

2 жыл бұрын

Same here.. syntax error on a dictionary hahaha

LOL I love how passionate she was about this, that's why Swifties made it a "joke"

I hope she doesn't feel pressured to have sonically cohesive albums, because although all of the albums that have won album of the year are S.C., I think trying to make an album feel like one big vibe is extremely challenging, and might leave her throwing away songs that would do well with fans. It's entirely her decision, but I what I love about 'evermore' is that it has songs that make it feel like a sister album to folklore, but she also branches out with songs like "no body, no crime', and 'gold rush', that have a different vibe than being lost in the forrest.

@islandrebelmakeup4653

2 жыл бұрын

Also I find excessive sonic cohesion can be monotonous. She did well with 1989, but I personally think with both lover and folklore, they do tend to get a bit monotonous.

@freddysamjacob363

2 жыл бұрын

But, I also think evermore is actually cohesive and wasn't all over the place.

@kghbandgeek

2 жыл бұрын

I'm genuinely hoping 1989 (Taylor's Version) has non-sonically cohesive bonus tracks. Because I feel like whatever didn't make the cut in that era was probably still fire

@victoriab7148

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the reason why I prefer evermore over folklore is because of the bigger sonical variety. I absolutely love folklore now but I didn't so much at first because I found it monotonous. Same thing with Fearless, I like it but I tend to get a bit bored of same-y sounding songs. I like it when albums have bigger sonical variety.

“10 people died in the Bronx last night due to a fire that killed 10 people in the Bronx due to a fire”

My favorite is RED cuz it’s not Sonically Cohesive. Every song is so different

Omg this is gold! I love ur channel

Imagine all the songs that were left off 1989 because they weren’t “sonically cohesive”. Hopefully we’ll get a lot of vault songs.

Please upload atleast one a week!! Missing your videos ☹️❤️

She says those words a lot, doesn’t she? 😂

I think Taylor’s obsession with sonic cohesion really stifled her on reputation and lover.

I am glad she stopped worrying so much about albums being Sonically cohesive. It's what the grammies want and it's what can make her carer bigger but in my opinion 1989 was her least authentic album because she worried so much about how all the songs need to flow and make sense.

@ruushberry

2 жыл бұрын

Yes.

@kasunkavishka2976

2 жыл бұрын

THIS.... her best albums were the ones that had different genres in it (speak now, red, evermore)

@blameitoncapitalism

2 жыл бұрын

Except she didn't stop tho. Her two newest albums are sonically cohesive. She learned her lesson from the mess Lover was.

@silence3030

2 жыл бұрын

@@blameitoncapitalism lover was EXTREMELY cohesive.

@kasunkavishka2976

2 жыл бұрын

@@silence3030 😂

Not me not knowing what does "sonically cohesive" mean💀

@matthewvillegas3622

2 жыл бұрын

I know this was months ago, but if you still don’t know, it means the songs on the album have a similar and distinct quality in the sound that unifies them. Like debut was country, Fearless was pop country, 1989 was a through and through 80’s-inspired pop album, Rep was dark electropop, and folklore was indie folk leaning. However, albums can be thematically cohesive even if they’re not sonically cohesive.

I have a feeling Taylor see's these videos and laughs soo much. I mean swifties are creative...!

Pls upload!! ❤️❤️🙏🙏

I absolutely love the harry styles at the end 😂 makes every video better

I love how she was almost trashing Red in the 1989 interviews, but in the RollingStone interview at the end, she was embracing it as she wouldn't have had 1989 without Red! 💖 Also, Red is my favorite album! The critics don't know what they're talking about!

anyone randomly watching taylor for some reason lol

reds least favorite two words

When she says the word "cohesive" I actually hear: "cockesive". Or something like that.

I think for me um.... all her songs are sonically cohesive. Time to go back to the robot factory for "maintenance". Now back to the fight deck of Space Station 76!

You know what? I don't think that winning a Grammy is what makes an album great. And yes, sonic cohesiveness is a really good characteristic when you make a record but I don't agree on the fact that Red and Speak Now are missing something just because they are not as cohesive as 1989. Speak Now is very cohesive in its melodies, lyrics and atmospheres. Red, instead, is probably the least sonically cohesive album of Taylor, but it has to be like that, as it resembles a heartbroken person. And heartbroken people never feel the same way all day long, they go from sadness to carelessness to loneliness and to small fragments of happiness too. Red is like this. So I think, it's good that it is not cohesive because it wouldn't have described heartbreak in the same effective way if it had been cohesive.

Eres muy linda. ❤👱‍♀️🌹 Felicidades para ti

Red is definitely one of her greatest albums by far. I can admit to that.

Where are you??? ☹️

"The fans make me fun of me for this so much over the course of a couple years" almost do: Sonically cohesive HELP

She really did that

😁😁😁🖤

wait whattt???

Lover was not sonically cohesive.

@user-rr6xk2eg9v

2 жыл бұрын

it waaas. Daylight-Afterglow-The Archer-False God : they’re so similar sound wise, don’t you think so?

@daniellecalder5193

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rr6xk2eg9v Yes! But then we had: Cruel Summer, I forgot that you existed, The Man, etc. that all go together. Then we have Cornelia St. and DBATC that go together. She used different producers who each did several songs and it shows.

@user-rr6xk2eg9v

2 жыл бұрын

@@daniellecalder5193 this is also true. Folklore and Evermore seem to be the most sonically cohesive

What's the song in the intro

I had a nightmare that Taylor did a remix of Hey Joe, by Jimi Hendrix. IS THAT SONICALLY COHESIVE ENOUGH? 🔥🦉🔥

@peippopeeir

2 жыл бұрын

It doesnt sound like nightmare to me. "Hey joe" is a masterpiece written By Billy Roberts. Some say it even had a hidden political message urging people to rebel against government during Vietnam war.

Conclusion is it's not *sonically* cohesive, but it is *thematically* cohesive. So there *is* cohesion, just through a different type of glue :D

@tiquis-miquis

2 жыл бұрын

except 22...

what does it mean 😭😭😭

@luc1jana

2 жыл бұрын

like it was connected by sound

What does it even mean!!!!

i literally started saying this completely unironically help

Lemme just say that sonic cohesion produced some of the most mainstream albums of her career, yes, but it did not deliver, by far, her most emotionally driven work. She may think sonic cohesion is an essential goal, but Speak Now and Red, being the two albums where she specifically mentioned it was chaotic sonically, were two of her best works of her entire career thus far. folklore FINALLY saw her able to blend sonic cohesion with the emotional depth of the Mariana Trench. I genuinely do not believe 1989, rep, or even Lover quite have the emotional/lyrical strength of Speak Now, Red, and folklore despite being highly regarded albums by fans. The thing that makes Taylor the artist that I love like no other is not her ability to make a bop, it's her ability to write a super detailed and impactful story in melody. What I'm saying is sonic cohesion is unnecessary for someone like Miss Swift because her emotional depth literally requires chaotic disruptions in the tone of any given track. Sonic cohesion is far easier to accomplish when the material you're working with holds the same or very similar emotional weight as many of her pop album songs did, but the deep cuts juxtaposed against the ecstatic power punches of Speak Now and Red wouldn't feel as strong to me if the music behind them was more "cohesive." I love the range of her art, and striving for sonic cohesion seemed, at least to me, to limit her range a bit.

@freddysamjacob363

2 жыл бұрын

What I'm saying is, Red wasn't exactly really sonically cohesive, But it still wasn't all over the place, which is great. But, sometimes cohesion is necessary, since the record being too all over the place leads to sounding more like a playlist than an album. No matter how great the Songwriting or artist. But, luckily Taylor hasn't made an album like that

@meg9611

2 жыл бұрын

i love it when people actually have something to say. i loved this thank

1989 is more sonically cohesive than Red but I feel like Red is more thematically cohesive

sounds like taylor did not like red at the time! but.....red >>>>>> 1989

@ruushberry

2 жыл бұрын

Definitely

@freddysamjacob363

2 жыл бұрын

Based

Sonically Cohesive By TayTay Juice Adhesive. That's the new TayTay song of the day. How many of those you need ?

the thing with Taylor is until the last few years, she was a really really bad people pleaser. like probably the worst case of people pleaser this earth has ever seen. and she had this need to be seen as perfect or good or a role model or what you’re “supposed to be”. she followed every rule, put everyone before herself, did everything she did to satisfy others and to be perfect instead of simply because she wanted to. and a big rule in music for the longest time was “you have to be just one thing.” “it all has to sound similar and cohesive or else you’re a mess” “you have to chose a genre to make music in”. and Taylor had those rules in her head and that’s why she seemed to kinda be disappointed in or dissatisfied with speak now and especially red for a while after they came out. those albums didn’t fit into a box. they didn’t follow that rule. but i think now with her being more mature and wise and having stepped out of that people pleasing phase... and also knowing she’s done multiple different genres and dominated in them all over the years, she shows a lot more love to speak now and especially red. she seems to accept and love that they’re a little all over the place and she seems to see the beauty and realness of the albums being all over the place. they represent where she was in life and how she was feeling so many different things at once and trying to figure herself out. it’s cool that despite her starting out as this people pleaser that was scared of making albums that were all over the place, she’s still the one of the few artists that blazed the trail to make albums that were a little all over the place. now that’s the new standard. people want albums to show an array of different feelings and thoughts. they want them to be all over the place and have different sounds. and that’s good because anything else is kinda boring. who wants to hear the same sound 14-20 times in a row?

😘💋

FIRST VIEW AND FIRST COMMENT😌😌😌😁🧚‍♀️😀🥰🥰

Im early woooo

Wtf that means

1st. ❤️

Yea I guess.

It kind he of sucked