Strangely, it somehow never occurred to me before just how FUCKING *LOUD* this thing must be.

Nothing: Me flushing the toilet at 3 am: 0:09

@rhn122

3 жыл бұрын

that's one AUTOTOILET you got there

@randomguy-ns2tc

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

ive always wondered how the t64 disposes of used aft caps. like the abrams just kicks it out and collects them t72 ejects and thest captures them in the carisole. pretty cool

I get that post apocalyptic/steampunk feeling when looking at those rusted machine

@Mach-2-Fishbed

6 жыл бұрын

Post apocalyptic is a close description here. Looks like its been a long time since she has seen any use, cleaning, or maintenance. She needs quite some work unless they want to resort to cranks to rotate the basket and raise the rounds as well as load them when the system fails like at 0:43.

@bendrenth441

3 жыл бұрын

It'd be pretty cool to have something like this in during the apocalypse though.

@humorss

Жыл бұрын

@@bendrenth441 ah no, any complex hot garbage will broke down before running through a tank of fuel.

@bendrenth441

Жыл бұрын

@@humorss Similarly could be said for the early production T-34s. (Breaking down before going through their first tank of fuel)

@jimmiller5600

Жыл бұрын

Russia is re-activating 800 of these for service in Ukraine, up against Leo-2, M1A2, Challenger-2, etc.

Pretty cool but seems like a very easy place to loose a finger or two

@zer0f0x69

7 жыл бұрын

if your not carefull, you could lose a whole arm!

@democratsarescumnukemecca4004

7 жыл бұрын

Jai McNutty Or life

@cloroxbleach3548

7 жыл бұрын

Jai McNutty if your are dumb enough to put your entire hand into the loading mechanism then yes you can lose a finger or an arm

@haramaschabrasir8662

7 жыл бұрын

It was actually known for that and they changed it after a few years

@fulcrum2951

6 жыл бұрын

Which is why only trained personnel are allowed to use a tank, you'd rarely get civilians to operate a tank especially when its fully loaded

Autoloader reminds me of a 5-disc CD player by RCA.

@bryanmartinez6600

5 жыл бұрын

How else would the fire some HARD BASS at the enemy

@bendrenth441

Жыл бұрын

We had one of those back in the day.

The visible rust and that grinding sound...

@MoskusMoskiferus1611

Жыл бұрын

ASMR

@Fred_the_1996

Жыл бұрын

My guess is that the maintenance was neglected post 1991

@caav56

10 ай бұрын

@@Fred_the_1996 Chances are, they unload it in preparation for T-64BM Bulat upgrade.

0:43 jamming is the worst thing to happened during the battle

@E.V.A.N-COProductions

Жыл бұрын

I Believe sending the *_tank itself_* Might be the worst thing to happen during the battle.

@Recoverys

6 ай бұрын

@@E.V.A.N-COProductions Do understand the tank didn't suck, it was quite good for what it is. To put it simply, Russia simply deployed these tanks without the infantry to help spotting enemy ATGMs which is why you keep seeing videos of Russia tanks blowing up.

@E.V.A.N-COProductions

6 ай бұрын

@@Recoverys You didn't understand my comment.

The sounds this thing makes are just so satisfying.

@tachikomagaming2451

12 күн бұрын

yeah, arousing even(i wish loud machinery was more appreciated)

It’s a good thing they wear headphones, I bet in a buttoned up tank that racket could just about drive you deaf

This is why the t72 and t90 eject their shell cases out

@urgi7703

5 жыл бұрын

This is a t64. What does this have to do with the video

@koalathebeast995

5 жыл бұрын

@@urgi7703 Because the reload is a pain

@TheArcticFoxxo

2 жыл бұрын

@@urgi7703 Yes, it's a T64. They're simply making a statement about the differences between MZ and AZ. What are you getting so pissy about?

@snoopdogssb2

Жыл бұрын

wdym it's a t64

@spookyperson7096

Жыл бұрын

@@snoopdogssb2 Reading comprehension sure is hard

thanks for showing carousel autoloader jam and its solution :3

i cant stop watching this video, im addicted to it. I just cant get over the sound.

Scariest shit there is the way they move between compartments - crewmen must manually remove 3 sections of this chain and get _through_ the opening just to get to the driver seat(from the turret). Fucking nightmare.

@user-og5jd9qc1y

Жыл бұрын

Это же так просто...,чтобы механику пролезть в боевое отделение или наоборот снимаются два лотка. Перед этим пушку танка опускают до максимума. Я служил на Т-64А в Украине. 1975-1977гг. Полгода нас учили в танковой учебной дивизии. Мы многому научились и тренировались на тренажёрах,а потом и в боевом танке... Было трудно сперва...,но потом легко и просто. Я учился на наводчика- оператора. В то время танк был секретным. После учебки служил в войсках на Донбассе. Никогда не подводил МЗ ( механизм заряжания), да и танки были новые 1973 года выпуска. Уволился двадцатилетним гвардии старшим сержантом и командиром танка в мае 1977 году.

That tank needs some serious overhaul

@neuroleptic2563

6 жыл бұрын

It is Ukranian, and a tank from the 60's, what do you expect?

@MrMezmerize

6 жыл бұрын

Mastica Páncreas well, they once were the best tanks the Ukrainians had until they further developed their T80s with Diesel engines. so maybe a bit more love would have been right. well, we will never know where and how this tank ended up and why its in that poor shape.

@neuroleptic2563

6 жыл бұрын

If you see videos on M1A1 Abrams, you'll see they look similar; rusted, with dust and dirty. They're simply old. Of course they could be better mantained, but for training is enough (despite i'm pretty sure russians, for example, train with T-90 and T-72 at least.)

@MrMezmerize

6 жыл бұрын

Mastica Páncreas Yeah thats true. Although the US sure got more budget to maintain its tanks. I bet the Russians mostly train with T72s, as they share the same principle of auto loader like the T90. Its way less moving parts and doesnt necessarly want to shove the gunner into the breach like the 64 :D

@neuroleptic2563

6 жыл бұрын

+Mr.Mezmerize that about tank autoloaders eating hand im afraid its just a myth. the more that can happen is getting it stuck (if you are enough smart to put it through the barriers and into the breech while loading). Abrams loadrrs, for example, you could say they can easily get stroke by the recoil in the breech, since it doesnt have so many barriers.

Да уж, вот так от лени "лотки" и гнут, а потом отказы....

@lipton701

11 ай бұрын

Вы русский?

Hypothetical question, but how long has that last shell been in there? You see all the rust on it?

@yi_hou3092

3 жыл бұрын

Probably since 1st deployment, T-64s never went outside the Union due to the T-64's components/the tank itself being too expensive to lose

@carkawalakhatulistiwa

Жыл бұрын

@@yi_hou3092 because t64 have conposif armor

@mairon154

Жыл бұрын

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa all modern tank have it, including t72

@warframehd1012

Жыл бұрын

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa So does Abrams.

@caav56

Жыл бұрын

@@warframehd1012 T-64 was still better of two Soviet MBTs of this time, with T-72 having been designed as a cheaper, corner-cut version to both pump the numbers and export.

I was waiting for a tear off arm when he was playing with carousel mechanism.

Seems really convenient to operate 😅

Smooth like butter.

that tank crew needs to spend some major time cleaning and maintenance that tank.

Man that’s cool!

Even though it's inferior to the bustle autoloader in tanks like the Leclerc, I still wish I could improve on this design. It's just cool to me. Main upgrades would be a much quieter 2 direction electric drive for the carousel, a fume vent, and added armor case (to reduce the chance of sub orbital trips by the turret when hit)

@trololoev

7 ай бұрын

all of it was in t-90m. Also leclerc or other autoloader at the back has other problem - it much easier to hit, especially today where drones usually hit at the rear or top of the tank. And if ammo detonate - there is no difference where ammo was, you and tank are dead. Difference is that this autoloader has much smaller chance to hit. For me personally more important to decrease chance of dying that to decrease height at that turret fly. In Syria 10 Turkish leo2 tanks destroyed in 1 day, 10 iraq abrams destroyed in month and 10 t-90 destroyed in 8 years. So i prefer safety of t-90. Also i didn't see a single t-90 in Syria without a turret and not a single leopard with a turret after being hit. So statistics said that this is safest option now, until armata become serial.

@HistoryShell1786

2 ай бұрын

@@trololoevwhat about now? You can find turrets to all Russian tanks around the battlefields of Ukraine.

@trololoev

2 ай бұрын

@@HistoryShell1786 and so? If tank catch fire, his ammo detonated in 100% cases. Important is if crew escape tank or not before fire going into crew compartment. Some tankers change 6-7 tanks during SMO.

@HistoryShell1786

2 ай бұрын

@@trololoev if you like the T-90M so much, I bet you have more information on it than I do. Other than its survivability stats in combat, what makes it your preferred option? What features does it pose that makes you feel safer in it? I’m genuinely curious

@trololoev

2 ай бұрын

First, it has more armor from all sides, not only from the front. Second: ERA. It increases protection even more and gives a chance even against weapons that tanks can't survive, like ATGM. Third: strong HE. Almost all tank targets require strong HE, but almost all western tanks have weak HE shells. Instead, they all (except Challenger) have strong AP, and tanks are 5-10% of tank targets. How will LEO-2 fight against fortifications, snipers, machinegunners, or AGM crews? The 4th T-72/T-90 is the most battle-tested platform; it is used all around the world, so there are no unpleasant surprises, like some loose bolts or unexpectedly broken detail. This is why I think that Abrams is the strongest western tank-because they find all the big disadvantages in battles and don't find new unpleasant surprises. For example, all PZH-2000s were broken mostly on their own because they weren't tested in battle before. I'm sure more old German artillery can show more reliability. 5th is mobility. t-90m is already at the limit of its weight, so I don't know how even heavier western tanks can move in dirt, on bridges, on small streets, etc. If the tank can't reach the battlefield, you can count it as if you didn't have a tank. This is why, despite the fact that I like the T-90M because it is a more protected and safe tank, real tankers like the T-80bvM tank more because mobility is the king of modern warfare. All modern tanks are almost equal, but this advantage I count as more important, so I think the T-90M and T-80BVM today are the best tanks. They didn't try to be APCs like Merava or movable anti-tank guns like Leo or Abrams; they specialized in being great tanks that destroy targets that are dangerous for infantry. 6km from the barrel are just pleasant additions.@@HistoryShell1786

That thing must be a pain in the ass to reload.

So it works with out the engine running? Sounds very quiet when it's not moving

@karnukabiyu2909

Жыл бұрын

It has a 24hp APU that runs the autoloader and fire control

@user-sr6pi5lp3q

Жыл бұрын

@@karnukabiyu2909 no shit? Do soviet tanks have aux power?

@user-sr6pi5lp3q

Жыл бұрын

@@karnukabiyu2909 only on never modifications.

I always wanted to be a tanker, but I listened to my mother and becane a medic -_- yeah should've gone with the tank

@clankplusm

5 жыл бұрын

You realise that just about any Russian tank is a deathtrap?, One RPG aimed at the turret basket and all of those shells underneath you go off.

@emelgiefro

5 жыл бұрын

@@clankplusm any tank that is shot with a rpg to the ammo is a death trap Russian tanks are quite good when not being used by retards Todays models have a protected carosel and armor is on par if not even better than western tanks + they are speedy light and small profile while your dear abrams is only good for desert combat against shitty export tanks with old optics and ammo like 3bm8 For example turkish leopard 2 crews lost many tanks to hillbilies with rpgs and atgms + export tanks are always low quality even american ones (take a look at arab abrams they get destroyed no problem) Your comment only shows how brainwashed you are

@clankplusm

5 жыл бұрын

@@emelgiefro maybe go look up "blow out panels", its a nice feature of the abrams, 2a4, 2a5, 2A6, etc, hell even our T-84-120 pulled it off (partially), while the t-72, T80, and T-90 all have the same old carousel which while being a pretty ingenious way to fit a lot of large shells into a tank, was flawed from the start. the abrams, which by the way i never mentioned, funny jump to conclusion that im a freeaboo there, while popular to hate i will say is probably one of the best MBTs around, i wont argue which is best, that is a brain dead question for idiots who argue the same about world war 2 tanks, each one is suited to a different doctrine.

@vimto1001

10 ай бұрын

@@clankplusm To be fair the carousel system isn't really the problem with ammo cookoffs. It's the loose ammo propellant charges scattered about the turret and hull that tend to get ignited and start the chain reaction, which was mainly solved with the T-90m's turret bustle (took them a while). Plus the Leopard 2's hull storage isn't protected by blowout panels so it too is vulnerable to cooking off and deleting the crew if hit, only difference being the turret stays attached. However I do definitely agree that the M1a2 Abrams is one of the best tanks around right now, and in most cases (but not all) is a vastly better vehicle than it's T-Series counterparts and that complete ammo seperation from crew is definitely something more tank designs need to start striving towards. I don't mean any disrespect or malice, just thought I'd correct or expand on some things you noted incase anyone reads this. Hope you have a good day and correct me if I got anything wrong myself.

This is T-64 not T-72.

@SupesMe

6 жыл бұрын

7N21 how do you tell?

@brianng9765

6 жыл бұрын

I think T-72's autoloader is electrical, maybe less noisy

@macckt1423

6 жыл бұрын

T72's shells and charges are horizontal and T-64's are vertical and horizontal.

@andersonparra835

4 жыл бұрын

@@SupesMe The T72 throw out the empty shells after firing

@kacperokotuk6766

2 күн бұрын

T64 autoloader is hydraulic and it should sound like "pssssss" but here we have something like buzzing so its electrical autoloader in T80

Командир танка не умеет перезаряжать танк. Понимаю

man i would not go in that thing for one second

That old mechanism

Heftig wie vergammelt der Panzer von innen ist.

All these tanks are so damn filthy. Damn. You'd hope there would be a way to clean them out.

Всем Привет из Georgia! Я служил на Т-64А в Украине. 1975-1977гг. Отличный танк... Никогда не подводил. После учебки служил в войсках на Донбассе. Танки были новые 1973 года выпуска..,мы за ними ухаживали и берегли после полигона или учений... Нас курсантов в учебной танковой дивизии учили всему,что должен уметь наводчик,также учились заряжать боекомплект на месте командира. Механик возле танка по очереди подаёт БК наводчику,который находится у люка командира и передаёт БК командиру,то сидя на своем месте укладывает в лоток..,а дальше дело техники. Нас даже инструкторы сержанты научились с перевязанными глазами загружать БК. В мае этого года ( 2023 г.) будет 46 лет как уволился, но помню всё,что знал. Последние полгода был командиром танка.

2:22 Fuck it, let's go to the bar!

im scared to just lay my fingers anywhere that...

It belongs to the Museum

it might be looks like shit, but atleast it get the job done

@williamsager805

6 жыл бұрын

At least as long as you don't get your hand in there while it is operating.

@roadhigher

6 жыл бұрын

You'd have to be mentally challenged to put your hand in there, since every soviet tank with an autoloader features a small wall between the gunner and commander and the autoloader, and includes enough space that you literraly cant get your body parts in there unless you make a concious effort to do so

@neuroleptic2563

6 жыл бұрын

Arrigator don't even try, there are still epople that think that the T series autoloader can rip your hand. They can't even try to search it in Google and see it's a myth.

@rockybalbao5004

Жыл бұрын

when hit, it turns the tank's turret into a low-orbital spaceship

@MoskusMoskiferus1611

Жыл бұрын

​@@rockybalbao5004. That goes the same with any other tanks if the ammunition got hit

is this tank held in storage or being used by an army?

@bendrenth441

Жыл бұрын

It's probably been fixed up since the video was taken and was pressed back into service after the Russians attacked.

@TheAddanz

Жыл бұрын

The arm patches suggest it maybe Ukrainian. Given the number of tanks they've lost its probably scap metal by now.

@caav56

Жыл бұрын

@@bendrenth441 It's likely was filmed when tanks were being updated to T-64BM Bulat standard.

a little question, why no gloves?

@user-ur8mm5nb8c

6 жыл бұрын

Probably because the Ukrainian soldiers (recognizable by their blue-yellow flag and TTsKO camo uniforms) are well versed in the sometimes [sic] troublesome autoloader. Plus, the hydraulic system [ found on the T-64, T-80 and T-84 Oplot/Yatagan ] wasn't too fast so they would not possibly be that afraid of injury. Actually, now they are unloading spent 2A46/M 125mm propellant cartridge cases [ which have possibly cooled down ], which would not be ejected from the tank in normal procedures unlike the T-72A/B/M/B3/B3M and T-90 family which relied on an electrically driven autoloader which would eject the shells whilst loading a fresh round into the 125mm breech! This autoloader tech is one example of high-quality OmskTransMash and Kharkiv + Malyshev Zavod, (et. al) precision technology coupled with the expertise of designers Kartsev and Venediktov & Bureau who are considered the fathers of modern Russian MBT technology. Interesting question there, matey!

@user-kk7ct5bh7r

6 жыл бұрын

thanks for the explain. still I prefer T-72 autoloader _(:з」∠)_ .

@user-ur8mm5nb8c

6 жыл бұрын

李沐升 I mean, electric drive does offer some advantages over hydraulic power... :\ :3

@williamsager805

6 жыл бұрын

In the defense of the T-64s autoloader it came several years before the T-72. After the T-64, Russia went out of it's way to make the T-72 workable. Even if that meant lower tech engine and transmission.

@Definitely_the_best

6 жыл бұрын

It will not defend you , just believe , if your hand on the loading line - it will load your chopped off hand .

That thing need serious cleaning and repairs before it hits the frontline, good lord.

reminds me of transformers

I thought that empty casing are throwed outside automaticly after firing..

@caav56

10 ай бұрын

On T-72 and derivatives, yes.

Are they doing maintenance on it?

@maus1729

7 жыл бұрын

Likely. By the looks of it, the tank has not been in operation for a while.

@Tlan_Hronsar

7 жыл бұрын

You have large errors in the video title. This tank T-64 (automatic loader differs from the T-72 even look. In addition, the T-72 does not remain pallets of charge, there is initially an automatic ejection), Ukrainian Army (Ukrainian language fighters and chevron with flag of Ukraine will not lie) . Change the name, do not make laugh the experts.

Doesn't look like a maintenance frieldly machine. Who knows, maybe it's extremely rugged.

Western tanks look so much nicer inside.

@lexonfors

Жыл бұрын

for starters, this tank is not up to standards, very rusted, dirty, and broken. But more importantly here at the time they really didn't, the american counterpart at the time was the M60A1, which the interior was pretty much the same as the regular M60. It did not look much better than this.

Why Abrams tanks have no those?

@timur5241

4 жыл бұрын

@Emperor Vitiate :\

@timur5241

4 жыл бұрын

@Emperor Vitiate ok

Esse barulho deve ser alto demais

Soviet design at its best

экстрактор поддона не работает

@user-sr6pi5lp3q

6 жыл бұрын

Armeec21 тут в коментах говорят что на т64 его и нету

@Armeec21

6 жыл бұрын

Мой европейский господин точно! Забыл совсем. Служил на т72

Are you stuck somewhere there buddy..lol

Korzina autoloader

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV, Jesus Christ is the only way......

Да уж, как только становиться сложно, сразу мова забывается...

easy way to loose a limb.

Guess you should watch your hands otherwise hands will be gone.

0:42 Uh-oh, it would appear the autoloader has suffered a malfunction. Now you can't load or fire the main gun, rendering the tank combat-ineffective. Gee, sure would be nice if a member of the crew could stick the round into the gun breech so the tank can continue to fight...

@caav56

10 ай бұрын

You can manual-load the gun (there are even trainings about it), it's just not very comfortable or easy, especially since it's loaded with separate projectile and propellant bags.

Jesus christ why is it sooooooooo loud

T-64 loved to grab crew members and try to stuff them in the breach....T-72 was a little more crew friendly.

@zipacna1980

6 жыл бұрын

That's a kind of Reagan Soviet jokes. Never heard about someone hurt by this. If you'd been inside these tanks you'd see why. You need to put some efforts to actually get in its way.

@user-kz9dp7wq6q

6 жыл бұрын

Did you serve in T-64? You say what you do not know.

@user-ur8mm5nb8c

6 жыл бұрын

Actually the T-64's hydraulic autoloader would be able to withstand jolting unlike the T-72's electrically driven mechanism. This version probably has had safety updates to make it as/even more ergonomic and user-friendly [ probably with shoulder rests foras the T-72/T-90 family series of autoloaders.

@user-kz9dp7wq6q

6 жыл бұрын

Hydraulics provide stable high speed of operation. The electric drive is not capable of this.

@user-ur8mm5nb8c

6 жыл бұрын

Андрей Филонов Cannot believe I've run into another aficionado of the T-64 autoloader. One more thing to note is that the 5TDF horizontally-opposed multifuel diesel offered smoother running on Kerosene, Petrol and Diesel!

Hhahah trzeba było to dać Japończykom do zrobienia to by się tak nie zacinało.. hahah

Loose a hand

ah I like the smell of grease and oil 😂

Looks like it use some WD40

damn those were some ugly boots

This is T-80 not T-64 !! The T-64 has a completely different automatic charging mechanism.

@user-jy7bj5nh6h

5 жыл бұрын

No they are quite similar. T-72's autoloader however, has a quite significant difference in terms of shape and how the round is loaded into the gun.

@clankplusm

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-jy7bj5nh6h t90 and t72 share principles and t80 and t64 share different principles

дублёр для чего вась

WTF is this bakery machine

@anotherrandomtexan25

6 жыл бұрын

robocop it will deliver sweet cakes of death!

@thomasbartel8453

6 жыл бұрын

robocop triggerd

@lostinthesauce6409

6 жыл бұрын

better than manual things

А какого хуя поддоны не выкидывает?

@titansa4024

6 жыл бұрын

Мой европейский господин На Т-64 поддоны укладываются обратно в лотки для зарядов

Crusty...

ovci

Is there a special medal for being eaten by your tank?

@neuroleptic2563

6 жыл бұрын

Why would you be eaten by this?

@emelgiefro

5 жыл бұрын

You need to really try to get your hand eaten by this

@Light-DelaBlue

5 жыл бұрын

Yes the stupid medal

@MoskusMoskiferus1611

Жыл бұрын

Food for Gun

sdfa

looks like a piece of shit system

Ахахааахахавваааххххахаахаваа Украинцы до сих пор этими танками воюют. У самих то мало чего есть

@kirilluskov2614

Жыл бұрын

русня до сих пор на т62 воюет. У самих то мало чего есть)

@pelmen1620

Жыл бұрын

​@@kirilluskov2614 клоун, у России т 90 450, а у украины 0 штук, не считая трофейные, и это только т90, а остальных в разы больше

@schizoposting9593

Жыл бұрын

Тем временем руские теперь воюют Т-54 и Т-62 😂.

@pelmen1620

Жыл бұрын

@@schizoposting9593 кто вам сказал? Колонны т54 и и т62 едут в тыл, чтобы встать как поддержка

0:16 imagine when you just deployed with obsolete t-64, with additonal rusty features in everywere, and bare minimum armor + ammo, at the point that you still feel amazed that this tank can run as normal. and then, almost a decade later, you trained in one of most sophisticated active tank in the world, with state of the art technology, even when most of the critical features are removed and detached from the donors before they send it. but at least it much better than majority tank that your enemy are ever deployed. ofc with almost unlimited ammo packaged supply from the donors too.

@theluckymanlive1989

Жыл бұрын

its training tank

@caav56

Жыл бұрын

Ukraine has some pretty advanced domestic tanks too, though, like Oplot and BM Oplot, albeit in low numbers (most were exported to pay for refurbishment and upgrade of old T-64 to T-64BM Bulat standard).

@zvin1611

Жыл бұрын

-state of the art -better than the enemy are ever deployed -unlimited ammo lol lmao

Too noisy

@werhnerd2773

3 жыл бұрын

it sounds cool though. And "too noisy" sounds like your whining, I mean, you gotta bear it. You fire, you want another shell, you hear this noise and your good to go.

@drunklorry3406

Жыл бұрын

Well, it's not a passenger aeroplane, you know

Überlegene Russen Technik auf Weltniveau!

@wilhelmkreuz7637

2 жыл бұрын

This is T-64... What did you expect? This is a tank of the 60s + this particular tank has not been serviced for a long time.

@Adk6954r4

Жыл бұрын

yeah nazi what ever you say

@benito_mussolini45

Жыл бұрын

Is ukrainian tank, clown

@02suraditpengsaeng41

Жыл бұрын

​@@benito_mussolini45 . . . Ukraine got this sh*t from Soviet, Russia in today You are clown after all

Russian technology, LOL

@user-bc8gy9se1q

6 жыл бұрын

Rickusty No, it is Ukrainian t-64..

@afghaaj

6 жыл бұрын

Rickusty Well, without their rocket engines technology Yankees wouldn't go to space anymore.

@kosiak10851

6 жыл бұрын

Russian and ukranian peop-le are the same.

@Sammakko7

6 жыл бұрын

kosiak10851 not true

@kosiak10851

6 жыл бұрын

Are you russian? I am!

The auto-loader is pretty noisy and you can easily lost your whole hand if you don't pay attention and careful to what you doing.

@cloroxbleach3548

7 жыл бұрын

Son Tung Le that is why the people in the tank are trained professional and not just any ordinary people who would be dumb enough to put their hand in the auto loader

@neuroleptic2563

6 жыл бұрын

You're more bound to lose a finger in tanks that doesn't have pieces of metal around the gun breech to avoid you stepping in it's way.

@emelgiefro

5 жыл бұрын

Same with the abrams/leopard the door that closes the ammo can easily chop your hand off

@Captain_Frank_Abagnale

5 жыл бұрын

I’d agree and say the blast doors on the abrams and Leo are quite possibly more dangerous since the loader has to get in its way to retrieve ammo

@ygorschuma3059

4 жыл бұрын

That thing is only operated by pressing a few buttons, unless you are stupid enough to put your hand in the auto loader while it's moving, then yes you are bound to lose a hand.

Easy way to lose a finger. I rather have a 4th man as a loader.

@chaos.....

Жыл бұрын

yes if you want to lose a finger

Российский танк не понял украинского языка, наверное. Как и ракета, сбившая гражданский лайнер над Черным морем.

@retriever7061

6 жыл бұрын

Да, всё зло из-за филологов и прочих гуманитариев. Мне тут замечание сделали, что я в немецкой картографической системе OSM российские улицы обозвал у себя в деревне не по правилам русского языка. Да, осознал. Вникая в проблему, прочитал 20-страничный форум русско-украинского срача о наименовании улиц в Мало-, Ново- и прочей России.

@Chastity_Belt

6 жыл бұрын

Ты видимо не в курсе где т-64 был разработан)

@user-kz9dp7wq6q

6 жыл бұрын

О сколько нам открытий чудных... Ну просвети, а то я все по прежнему уверен, что в Украине, в Харькове, в КБ возглавляемом А.А. Морозовым.

a running coffin

💙💛💯🦾

русскии танки для камикадзе.

@denschoff3169

Жыл бұрын

Это хохлячья труповозка, по шевронам видно

@Anton-cg7og

4 ай бұрын

Это украинский танк