Russia really out did themselves with stealth technology. This tank is so stealthy that nobody has seen it anywhere else besides parades on Red Square.

@TheEnabledDisabled

Жыл бұрын

its so good, it dosent even need to be used in combat

@maverickf1426

Жыл бұрын

same to su-57 XD

@whiskeynovember8498

Жыл бұрын

@@maverickf1426 The Su-57 is already being used against Ukraine.

@nidzaaa21

Жыл бұрын

Same as B21

@modrytriko

Жыл бұрын

Well few of them were seen at the start of the invasion but after like 2 weeks there were absolutely no reports of seeing them anymore

When the gunner misses a shot, the commander and driver can slap him simultaneously💀

@richarddoig1865

Жыл бұрын

It’s called the 3 stooges package. Much more user friendly than the Stalin package though…

@KonradvonHotzendorf

Жыл бұрын

Lol 🤣

@hvermilion23kx

Жыл бұрын

lmao

@venomsnakeDD

Жыл бұрын

ARMATA ?..... ARMATA ? ..... ARMATA !!!!!

@gauss_gun

Жыл бұрын

No, they all slap the computers in front of them

Don't worry guys they'll probably have to remake this video in a few months with information generously presented on the war thunder forums

@BlueandWhiteArmyBRFC

Жыл бұрын

I swear to god if they release even more classified documents about tanks im gonna cry

@JustSapoetra

Жыл бұрын

@@BlueandWhiteArmyBRFC They will. We will.

@irongeneral7861

Жыл бұрын

@@BlueandWhiteArmyBRFC xD

@frenchhonhon

Жыл бұрын

@@BlueandWhiteArmyBRFC start crying already. It's gonna happen.

@user-mo3cf8he7g

Жыл бұрын

LMAO, BASED AF

the 14 in T-14 refers to the total number of units built before its inevitable cancellation

@wadopotato33

Жыл бұрын

"T" stand for terminated. 14 stands for the final unit before termination.

@Swagmaster07

Жыл бұрын

I know this is a joke, but in seriousness it means the aprox. year that it was introduced in.

@luigimrlgaming9484

Жыл бұрын

@@wadopotato33 Then is there only 90 T-90s? Also I doubt it’s cancelled, anyone can tell it’s their best shot and they need to shed as much unnecessary skin to actually get it in effective quantities.

@nabielffgi7737

Жыл бұрын

so t72 mean only 72 unit?...

@floppi7098

Жыл бұрын

@@nabielffgi7737 they have thousands of t72s

I can best describe this tank as a new toy that has yet to be taken out of its box, and likely never will

@ivoivic2448

Жыл бұрын

it may as well be that proverbial scroll of fireball you keep saving because "there will be better use for it"

@auricom8472

Жыл бұрын

Reminds me of the more powerful Japanese ww2 tanks that were only used for home defense. The Armata might just be used for defending Russia within its own borders.

@QwerYT4819

Жыл бұрын

Just left in a display case.

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

Жыл бұрын

Continue poking and underestimating the bear. Russia still winning this war. Russia is using all new weapons like Su-57 you guys said same thing just for display

@jake4194

Жыл бұрын

@Ivo Ivic this comment brought back great oblivion and skyrim memories lol

"The tank is designed with double uranium, polonium, low-oxidized armor, or DUPLO. This armor helps the T-14 stay modular, as bricks can be clicked into and out of configuration. The extra thickness, as opposed the the Western LEGO modular armor bricking, is thought to help reinforce the tank against direct hits. Further, if the tank were to be stepped on, it would make the unfortunate soldier experience what is often called...'A Big Owie'."

@constantinecondor3470

Жыл бұрын

“Additionally, through the use of Sensitive Tracking and Intelligence Control Keystroke-operated Electronic Radar Systems or STICKERS which are emplaced on top of the DUPLO armor, the T-14 Armata is easily capable of having complete battlefield awareness as well as looking real neat.”

@beaumontgile5886

Жыл бұрын

Lol

@PeppermintMERCY

Жыл бұрын

Don't forget about the hello kitty badge defense system

@TheMeanmarine13

Жыл бұрын

@@PeppermintMERCY 🤣😆

@TheMeanmarine13

Жыл бұрын

@@constantinecondor3470 it will also look real "neat" after multiple hits from the Himar. A neat, smoldering pile of communism 🤣. They'll never actually use that propaganda toy because they don't want to show the world it's susceptible like any other piece of equipment. And they probably don't have the materials to make many more.

T-14 reminds T-64 at it's release - it was so innovative and expensive that it made soviet tank designs to separate to T-64/T-80 and T-72/T-90.

@darkrolf7185

Жыл бұрын

Most people forget, that the Armata is already in massproduction, and its costs have been decreased to 3 million, cheaper than most of the other MBT in the World, so its no longer a expensiv Toy, cause now there are comming way more. But they have only already begun to produce them in series.

@insidiousvictim

Жыл бұрын

@@darkrolf7185 forgot the "trust me bro"

@nomaidens2

Жыл бұрын

@@darkrolf7185 well uh... if its mass-produced. Then where is it in Ukraine?

@22bach64

Жыл бұрын

@@darkrolf7185 so any nations buy it ? Where is it now in Ukraine ? Most deadly art of the tech, Su-57 and T-14 look like a toy that the boy always tries to show off with his friends, but of course it never leaves the box

@darkrolf7185

Жыл бұрын

@@nomaidens2 This is why i said, they only have begun, but you can even see it in german press, if you want to, Spiegel and Bild and many others wrote about it. And it isnt in Ukraine, cause it is still a very valuable tank, so instead they use t-90 and t-90m

Suggestion: Can you do a history of the German Leopard Tanks and the Japanese Type 90 Tanks?

@thefrunze.198

Жыл бұрын

Or the T-72's

@Skim_beeble7125

Жыл бұрын

How about you go watch an actual tank KZreadr so you can actually learn this channel tends to bend history from time to time kinda depends they definitely have a odd bias in my opinion

@dinoco3672

Жыл бұрын

TYPE 90 history = leopard copy

@MatteonixITA

Жыл бұрын

@@dinoco3672 Leopard copy but a better one lol

@johnathanczakel5195

Жыл бұрын

Type 90s

It is also said there will be newer models of the T-14 will include a swimming pool, a kitchen, a library, and a minibar..... but this information has not yet been confirmed.

@57menjr

Жыл бұрын

Leak

@Novosti_PA

Жыл бұрын

with this you to TOG 2

@murderofcrows2179

Жыл бұрын

That only Putin and a handful of his close friends will enjoy.

@misterdark-pl3jo

Жыл бұрын

I'm sure soon we will have the full specification of T-14 on War Thunder forum

it is so stealthy that you will NEVER see it coming in the battlefield, as in NEVER.

@aenodarr7936

Жыл бұрын

Oh wow it's almost like we've seen Leopard 2A7+ in the battlefield, or M1A2 SEP V4 for that matter. no? Oh but that's different i guess

@Igor-xv8sf

Жыл бұрын

@@aenodarr7936 Don't forget that Germany has only 1 functional armored bridge with leopard 2a7s, less than the amount of armatas Russia has

@venomsnakeDD

Жыл бұрын

METAL ..... GEAR ..... Why doesn't anyone say anything it's obvious that it's David Hayter the narrator

@magniwalterbutnotwaltermag1479

Жыл бұрын

@@Igor-xv8sf still sending more tanks in general, 100 leopards on the way

@Igor-xv8sf

Жыл бұрын

@@magniwalterbutnotwaltermag1479 14 Leopard A26 that have to be repaired first, 187 Outdated Leopard 1s from the same era as T55

I don't think there's a tank out there that exists that has more unjustifiable hate than the Armata. It is a step in the right direction for MBT's. I respect its design. But we all know the Bob Semple clearly outmatches any tank out there.

@janord3123

Жыл бұрын

I think it's a good idea to use remote turrets nowadays, because you can save a lot of weight on turret Armor, which you can instead focus on the crew. It would be interesting though to see them in action, especially with Germany sending 2A6s, that way we can see whether (mostly) modern NATO tanks have the ability to destroy it. But yes I do agree a metal plate on a tractor is still the best thing there is.

@Parthemonium

Жыл бұрын

Maximus here speaking tbe Truth! For sure its a step in the right Direction, nontheless with its current Tech Base not much will be built, stuff like this takes Chips that Russia wont be able to produce in the next 10 years if you want to have it working properly. Either gotta import from China or, rn atleast, smuggle it from somewhere.

@MrStephansucks

Жыл бұрын

New Zealand is currently working of a Bob Semple - M variant, all crew are now in the prone position

@GeorgiiiVaampire

Жыл бұрын

The point is that it's Russian made So they can claim everything they want, reality is often miles from their claims as with any other of their wonder weapons

@ZaraTheFemboy

Жыл бұрын

While I agree with you that the tank does many many things right. The drawbacks of the design leave a lot to be desired. The lack of turret armour, the height, the questionable effectiveness of its ERA and more important its APS system all come to mind. Not to mention that some systems may not even be able to be produced in the quality that the tank has previously been able to due to international sanctions. Not to mention that if the tank was as good as the Russian MOD says it is, and they are as confident in it as they pretend to be. They would have deployed it by now.

"The Russian military is large and modern. Except the large part is not modern, and the modern part is not large."

@UriNierer

Жыл бұрын

And dont forget that modern does not mean good.

@MrBejkovec

Жыл бұрын

And don't forget that the most of the modern part got decimated in its 3 day speciul operation already.

@karantikoo9302

Жыл бұрын

@@MrBejkovec you wish it was..

@chrisedrev9519

Жыл бұрын

​@@karantikoo9302 Apparently YOU wish it wasn't. xD

@user-it3xy2cw1t

Жыл бұрын

@@chrisedrev9519 idk if Russia still has modern equipment but most of they're loses are older equipment

The most advanced parade tank ever designed. Every parade should have a T-14.

@Avivnz

Жыл бұрын

Bro are you stupid, Russia is not selling T-14s worldwide

@YoGranDaddyEvil

Жыл бұрын

@@Avivnz "Bro are you stupid" Stand in front of a mirror and ask yourself that question.

@Avivnz

Жыл бұрын

@YoBigDaddyEvil And how do you think is Russia gonna sell their most advance tank to other countries? Low on braincells huh?

@jonathanwebb8307

Жыл бұрын

I would rather have rain than a T-14 at my parade

@VFella

Жыл бұрын

@@YoGranDaddyEvil Let me guess: This is what you ask yourself every morning, right?

4:45 This practically has no effect against tandem warheads, like the Javelin. The missile uses two charges to defeat ERA, a smaller primary charge detonates first against reactive armor, taking it out before the second and much larger charge detonates next, actually causing the damage.

@sam8404

Жыл бұрын

True but there are also lots of non tandem (not sure what the word for that would be, single?) warheads in use too. They used an RPG for that demonstration and ERA works pretty well against those, although some of them also have tandem warheads too now.

@patwilson2546

Жыл бұрын

It also attacks from the top where there is no ERA. The T-14 might be able to keep its crew alive (not tested so TBD) but the tank is still dead.

@sam8404

Жыл бұрын

@@patwilson2546 yes unless they set it for direct attack mode.

@Zirodays

Жыл бұрын

@@sam8404 that's only for 360° parallel to the ground and not top attacks. Let alone in a urban setting and artillery

@jeremygair4007

Жыл бұрын

@sam8404 There are thousands of javelin in Ukraine...

IMHO, the most plausible theory as to why the T-14 has not been mass-produced yet rests on two main factors: 1- The tank demonstrated in 2014 was a pre-production model, which was tested in Syria circa 2019, after which some modifications were made to it's hull armor and side skirts. But otherwise the Tank is still undergoing additional testing before it sees mass production, which is typical of any brand-new weapons system. 2- Russia has prioritized the modernization of its huge T-72B fleet to T-72B3M standards, and it's smaller but still substantial T-90A fleet to T-90M standards, which would allow them to extend the T-72s service life by another decade and the T-90's by another two. It's a "bird in hand" type of situation, if you must, especially when Ural Vagon Zavod's production capacity is taken into account.

@WebmsJU

Жыл бұрын

Finally someone that is not joking or saying useless crap.

Apparently it can take a direct hit from the death star.

@ozarkstate

Жыл бұрын

@@trockner9341 The outdated M1 Abrams has beat Russian origin tanks multiple times and has preformed better 💀. pfp explains it all.

@Ramirez-ck6iq

Жыл бұрын

​@@ozarkstate T-55s don't count

@ozarkstate

Жыл бұрын

@@Ramirez-ck6iq *T-72s produced about 6 years before the Abrams...

@Ramirez-ck6iq

Жыл бұрын

@Ozark State early versions of the T-72 was used while more modern abrams was used and both are 10 years away from each other

@ozarkstate

Жыл бұрын

@@Ramirez-ck6iq The M1A1 variant was the big one that faced the T-72 off only being 6 years after the original M1... Not that big of a time difference. The T-72 also has variants not sure what you're point is... even then the numbers of losses isn't near the M1.

It's called the T-14 because Russia only has 14 of them.

@amin_baccari

Жыл бұрын

Because its prototypes are undergoing testing and haven't been mass produced yet you thickheaded nitwit

@thefurballs

Жыл бұрын

LMAO

@darkonojic7494

Жыл бұрын

It is smart to underestimate enemy.

@zed11634

Жыл бұрын

never underestimate your enemy. could be deadly.

@ColorMeTeal

Жыл бұрын

@@zed11634 the only deadly thing russia has left are the nukes that probably dont even work anymore

Financial difficulties will make this tank unlikely to be deployed in large numbers until, at least, 2030.

@danieliyoverde123

Жыл бұрын

By that time will be outdated

@SallyWalllyy

Жыл бұрын

@@danieliyoverde123depends on how they roll it out or update it To be fair, some nations in NATO are still using t-70s and other T variants

@minhmeo9506

Жыл бұрын

@@danieliyoverde123 16 years is not enough to make a military technology obsolete. By that time they will still be formidable or at least capable.

@danieliyoverde123

Жыл бұрын

@@minhmeo9506 not obsolete but it will be no longer the most advance tank, now to be fair during ww2 the best tanks of 1939 where just death traps by 1942, thats just only 4 years, its not like we are in a situation of total war to evolve so fast but still technology its catching russia, USA and europe obviously began to work on new generation of tanks

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

Жыл бұрын

@@professionalschizo they have 100 actually you will see them in battle and Russia now has got new weapons and all in production

The reduced crew size allows for more space to carry cannisters of Copium for Russians to imagine these tanks actually meet spec. All reports currently are that the tank crews refuse to use the T14 because they break down and jam up but no one is trained to use them so cannot quickly fix the issues. Until these are actually seen outside of parades we may as well be discussing Imperial Guard Leman Russ tanks from Warhammer 40k.

@faritik6252

Жыл бұрын

Source: u made it up

@luigimrlgaming9484

Жыл бұрын

I would think that problem is to be expected, it’s a new system and their old training pipeline relied on being able to use the same or very similar systems that were simply modified to keep up with the Americans. Makes sense why the T-14 being so different from more traditional designs wouldn’t have a proper training pipeline set up for it yet.

@TheRogueEmpire

Жыл бұрын

@@faritik6252 cope ruskie

@kaeji_namitsua

Жыл бұрын

Can you share the reports?

@ZeroOne-mp1qe

Жыл бұрын

@@faritik6252 source v2: your cope

If Russia actually builds it in quantity and up to the specs mentioned it'd be a great tank, but it's Russia

@bobigorg1665

Жыл бұрын

The same as "Russia ran out of missiles back in April 2022"

@aleksazarin319

Жыл бұрын

Russian tank factories that were closed for decades are reopened and working 24/7

@MrBejkovec

Жыл бұрын

@@bobigorg1665 Stop using VPN, Mongoloid. Your ammo storages are pretty liked be HIMARS. What about your partnership with Iran, cause you can produce like 20 Lancet's a year?

@MrBejkovec

Жыл бұрын

@@aleksazarin319 Lol, nope. The only factory manufacturing tanks in Ruzzia is UralVagonZavod. In 2021 they were able to produce exactly 0 new tanks. Only 136 upgrade packets for T-72's. Try harder.

@robbedg2795

Жыл бұрын

@@bobigorg1665 sadly they still have those and will have them for quite a while still. I just don't see the Russian industry being able to build new vehicles aswell as reconstituting Russian losses. It's going to be one or the other....

3:03 the abrams has a blowout pannel for every part of its ammo storage its turret would not plop off that easily

@hansgulayev7320

Жыл бұрын

cope

@kamulecPL12

Жыл бұрын

@@hansgulayev7320 kinda cringe bro

@thatguystalker8649

Жыл бұрын

KORNET proved otherwise

@thezig2078

Жыл бұрын

.

@whiskeynovember8498

Жыл бұрын

@@thatguystalker8649 No enemy has ever destroyed an Abrams.

Now you've done a video on the T14 the next gen MBT, I suggest you should do a video on the Centurion Mk 1, the first MBT, it was supposed to fight in wwii

@markusdee6136

Жыл бұрын

tank vs tank battles don't / rarely happen now. It's usually tanks vs ATGMs now.

@darnit1944

Жыл бұрын

@@markusdee6136 How is this relevant to how the Centurion is the first MBT and supposed to fight in WW2?

@markusdee6136

Жыл бұрын

@@darnit1944 just a comment that got lost. Thought I was replying to another post.

@KyHgFyPadla

Жыл бұрын

You got leopards,we got armatas.Everything is fair,aren`t it?(i`m from russia btw)

@JGD185

Жыл бұрын

@@darnit1944 could argue the Panther was the first MBT. Overall the most balanced tank of WW2

If the T-14 armata’s auto loader is anything similar to that of the T-72 or the T-90. Then it’ll likely be another turret popper in the Russian army’s arsenal. EDIT: It’s likely that this is the same case with the T-14 Armata judging by its design. It’s turret isn’t big enough to store a large quantity of tank ammunition, and since the tank crew takes up the front space of the tank and the engine occupies the back of the tank, it very likely that the tank ammunition of the T-14 Armata, is store right beneath its turret. Just like with all the Russian tanks to date since the Cold War.

@IloveBaguette

Жыл бұрын

But now it is seperated from the crew to protect them. Then again it's Russia so anything could still go, like the Moskva and it's theoretical "air defense system". Watch lazerpig's video for how functional their Black Sea Flagship is when they went to war.

@TheManinBlack9054

Жыл бұрын

@@IloveBaguette Black Sea Flagship? Source? Lazerpig probly lied lol, it was never a flagship. Thats inaccurate.

@zinnsoldat6493

Жыл бұрын

@@TheManinBlack9054 Moskva was a flagship of Black Sea Fleet

@luigimrlgaming9484

Жыл бұрын

@@IloveBaguette “Fictional?” It’s very real, it might not be the best but there is definitely one there as the soviets had one.

@aenodarr7936

Жыл бұрын

@@zinnsoldat6493 Fun thing, "was". At the time of it's destruction it wasn't a flagship for at least a year or two

As long as the tanks don’t start walking. The missing link between infantry and artillery. A type of…metal gear, if you will…

@Yuritarkov

Жыл бұрын

metal gear 6: russian boogaloo

@luisemoralesfalcon4716

Жыл бұрын

Gundams...

@AvenValkyr

Жыл бұрын

Funny. I was thinking that the entire time I was watching this video. All eyes on Japan

@ivoivic2448

Жыл бұрын

the day we strap into a cockpit of a mech is coming. just be patient.

@RonJeremy514

Жыл бұрын

Orbital Frame Jehuty when?

it's amazing that russia has been able to design a tank that is totally invulnerable to anything else on the battlefield. Of course that's because it's never going to actually make it onto one

Will you be doing videos on other next-generation battle tanks such as Challenger 3, KF51, and EMBT?

@jebise1126

Жыл бұрын

when they will exist 🤣

@dps1794

Жыл бұрын

@@jebise1126 they do as a prototype like T14, dont be a clown

@jebise1126

Жыл бұрын

@@dps1794 its a mock up you wanker

“Giving the tank a lower profile than manned counterparts” …Then why is it taller than most tanks? You said that it’s 3.3 meters tall, and the only tank that even comes close is the Leopard 2A7, and that’s only 3.03 meters tall.

@TheTrueAdept

Жыл бұрын

That likely includes the RWS.

@jebise1126

Жыл бұрын

on picture it was clearly visible 3,3 meters is highest point and that was machine gun module on top of turret

5:09 I love the fact they got this sight from a steam review for Squad

@meikapoika5172

Жыл бұрын

Battlefield 4 also has that type of sight

1400mm of RHA equivalent doesnt mean its 1400mm thick. It means its usually much thicker but lighter than 1400mm of RHA. Also APFSDS rounds in flight do not spin. That actually destabilizes this type of projectile.

@alexandr4946

Жыл бұрын

British challengers use a rifled gun, at the moment excluding the T14 and other test MBT, this is a tank with the most accurate gun, precisely because of the rotation of the projectile in flight

@TheDude50447

Жыл бұрын

@@alexandr4946 Even though the Challenger holds the record for the longest confirmed kill rifled guns are less accurate than smoothbore. The gun on the Challenger series is rifled so it can shoot the rather large stockpile of regular hesh rounds the UK has in stock. The upcoming Challenger 3 switches to a smoothbore gun as well. The only disadvantage of smoothbore is that they require fin stabilized ammunition

@gimmethegepgun

Жыл бұрын

@@alexandr4946 High accuracy doesn't mean a whole lot when you can't fire a round that will actually defeat an enemy tank. Both HEAT and APFSDS hate rifling.

I think the AbramsX layout is more efficient. Similar to the Armata, but ammo is in the bustle not the hull, providing room for the crew to go into the turret to fix any problem with the main gun and machine guns. Plus it’s useful for the commander to stick his head out of the turret when he needs it.

@janvandeven906

Жыл бұрын

Much more important if an Abrams get hit and a round exploded its gets vented outside with Russian autoloaders All the ammo goes and then the turret

@currygod4117

Жыл бұрын

the abramsx doesnt even exist yet. say what you want about the russians but they fielded a next generation tank that is significantly cheaper than their western counterparts currently.

@janvandeven906

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/kXihqsmko63AZtI.html

@janvandeven906

Жыл бұрын

@@currygod4117 And different viewpoints thats all America cares more about its tankcrews

@arandomboot598

Жыл бұрын

@@currygod4117 The west follows quality over quality to counter the Russian quantity over quality mentality

remembers me of the su 57 its told that we cant destroy a squadron of those becouse its hard to kill a squadron when there isnt one

@andreteofilovic2240

Жыл бұрын

They fly like 5 and are scared to enter Ukrainian airspace 😂😂😂 scared of fucking manpads and 1990 Patriot Block I 😂😂😂😂😂😂 junk 😂😂😂 A F-117 Nighthawk made in 1970 is more stealth 😂😂😂

@hrisoflinoski4803

Жыл бұрын

Оди лечисе

Another modern russian tank is the 2S25 Sprut-SD/M1 light airborne tanks, they are one of the few new generation light tanks being produce in the 21st century. As most countries have abandoned the light tank concept in favor of the IFV's. Also the Kurganets-25 IFV, the T-14 of russian IFV's.

@joshuagraham9770

Жыл бұрын

Love your videos

@VFella

Жыл бұрын

IFV like the CV90 are just as powerful as any light tank. The 25 mm autocannon of a Bradley can kill most of the Soviet models, imagine what this baby can do with any of the 35 - 40 or 50 mm it can use. No lack of this type of vehicles. A big gun is not always needed if you can carry a few anti-tank missiles and a drone.

@jmantime

Жыл бұрын

@@VFella True, there’s a light tank version of the CV-90 being made aswell. also American Griffin II and Chinese ZTQ-15 Light Tanks.

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Жыл бұрын

@@VFella well, a Russian can also shoot a rocket, but only from the barrel

@SnappBacc

Жыл бұрын

Finally someone mentioned the 2S25

5:25 Damn Simple History out here with the SQUAD Abrams Sight Lol

@meikapoika5172

Жыл бұрын

Bf4 also has that kinda sight...

@FokkerBoombass

Жыл бұрын

You know this is how the actual sight looks like, right...

Where are the cameras located. It seems like without the cameras the tanks would be much more vulnerable to attack. Assuming they have several around the tank.

I keep seeing videos of how great this tank is supposed to be and I feel like at this rate, Russia's gonna be so in love with the myth behind the Armata, they may never make any production model since it will never live up to the hype created around it.

@johnhenryeden7535

Жыл бұрын

Just like Half Life 3

@Denis_Komarrov

Жыл бұрын

Well we actually saw usage of russian terminators in Ukraine. They were famous too and got allot of videos made about them.(Not sure why videos about terminators made by ukranians are not very popular)

@iileross8398

Жыл бұрын

@@Denis_Komarrov Supposedly they just didn't build any and nobody wanted to buy them. If they existed and performed well there would be videos.

@Denis_Komarrov

Жыл бұрын

@@iileross8398 But there is videos about exploits of russian terminators in Ukraine. They were part of attack near Severodoneck. Also there is video about attack this month too. Both are very successful according to russain MO.

@iileross8398

Жыл бұрын

@@Denis_Komarrov I meant Ukrainian ones. The Russian ones we know exist and are ostensibly successful.

The best tank that the World has never seen :D

@nerdemoji5711

Жыл бұрын

Nah

@hank5367

Жыл бұрын

Ah, I see what you did there, nice wordplay

@PanzerTheFox

Жыл бұрын

Like the AbramsX!

@KapitanPisoar1

Жыл бұрын

@@PanzerTheFox Well AbramsX has just recently been announced and it is still in development. It haven't been paraded 8 years ago, pretending it is a ready for action...

@PanzerTheFox

Жыл бұрын

@@KapitanPisoar1 it is not ready for any action, its only a *CONCEPT*, while the armata has been on the polygon and some fights recently.

I just really like the design of this tank!

@arandomboot598

Жыл бұрын

Respectable. I like the leopard and leclerc but to be fair the T-14 does look kinda neat

@derpydood

Жыл бұрын

Sometimes, it's just nice to enjoy the craftsmanship/design of a weapon without the political baggage.

@EasilyCringed

Жыл бұрын

@@arandomboot598 Leclerc is expecially nice

@turbochargedtrex

Жыл бұрын

@@derpydood yes

@misterdark-pl3jo

Жыл бұрын

I like german Panther Reinmetall presented in 2022. It really looks like tank from the future

the idea that it can resist javelins is hilarious.

@kommanderc7208

Жыл бұрын

Not by resisting penatration, but by destroying the missile mid air. It can detect the missile incoming, and then destoy it by shooting it with what is essentially a shotgun.

@bryanmccarthy6493

Жыл бұрын

@@kommanderc7208 like any and every piece of "modern" weaponry from Russia, it will not work and will only result in dead Russian conscripts. They can't even provide real body armor and functional small arms to front line troops.

@thorwaldjohanson2526

Жыл бұрын

@@kommanderc7208 active protection systems are theoretically possible, but I somehow doubt Russia will successfully implement them in production anytime soon.

@darnit1944

Жыл бұрын

Survivability onion. Instead of "Can it survive a Javelin attack", you should have asked "Can it not be attacked by the Javelin in the first place?"

@Kuraimizu9152

Жыл бұрын

@@thorwaldjohanson2526Russians had been developing Active Protection Systems since the 60's... See the Drozd system

I heard that updated version includes compartments for stolen toilets and washing machines!

very cool idea but this will be very VERY expensive to much to be mass produced during war and most prob will never see combat

pretty much every modern tank can survive an RPG

@arandomboot598

Жыл бұрын

Nope

@arandomboot598

Жыл бұрын

Most WESTERN tanks can. Russian tanks most likely can’t

@oddy1637

Жыл бұрын

@@arandomboot598 🤓

@ministryoftruth7229

Жыл бұрын

@@oddy1637 literally anyone's response and the comment could be out of context and still work lol

@nicz7694

Жыл бұрын

Didn't one of those newer T-90 variants got blown up by an AT4?

I have yet to see a menace that never saw combat and still suffered engine failure on parade, but hey, you never know.

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

Emergency hand brake engaged by an untrained driver, likely operating the vehicle the first time due to its classified nature, if the engine actually broke down it should still have been able to towed by the recovery vehicle, but as we saw, the brakes stopped that from happening

@SgtLogOfWood

Жыл бұрын

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here No no. It was towed by another tank. I don't think we're refering to the same parade.

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

@@SgtLogOfWood 2015 victory parade. The recovery vehicle *attempted* to tow the tank, but failed because of the brakes (which locks the suspension in place). This is the only parade where the T-14 supposedly had issues

@kindgrinds

Жыл бұрын

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here cope.

@koskok2965

Жыл бұрын

@@kindgrinds Very original and elaborate. Got a couple more braincells to spare for an actual reply?

*Excellent video as always Simple History, we always enjoy your content!*

2013-2015 when they were annouced We are in 2023 and they still haven't made more than a handfull for parade As each time in Russia and old Soviet Block...*Great ideas,big ambitions...but still running old stuff* All we know so far about T-14 is what Russia said out it can do,but how many of these things can it actually do is a massive mistery

Some say the T-14 use the same amazing optics as are used on the great 100% russian Orlan-10 drone =D

@TheManinBlack9054

Жыл бұрын

How is Orlan not Russian?

It's a cool tank but it's electronics is mostly western. Who knows how much time it will be until it would be replaced by homemade stuff. I think it'll take about 5-10 years.

5:12 what the f... happened with the cannon?!?!

For each Armata that gets built, a thousand aluminum garbage cans go missing.

I was literally looking up T 14 pictures and then two minutes later this video just gets uploaded

@filippotomasino6251

Жыл бұрын

me too lmao

Armata broke down twice during parades, even tho all of armored vehicles before a roll out were checked 3+ times.

@milsimmaniac711

Жыл бұрын

They didn't break down

@allewis4008

Жыл бұрын

@@milsimmaniac711 Tearing your transmission apart is commonly known as breaking down.

@milsimmaniac711

Жыл бұрын

@@allewis4008 the driver hit the parking brake look it up

@volodyameshkov1469

Жыл бұрын

Смешные вы конечно, посмотри лучше какие танки у вас, точнее их отсуствие

@cheshirecynic3061

Жыл бұрын

@@volodyameshkov1469 Yes, the absence of T-14s is very funny :)

5:14 The sight here threw me for a loop. Is that inspired by the one in Squad?

As a former 10yr tanker in the German Army (L2 A5-7) got only one thing to say, if you don't have air supremacy any tank in the world would get knocked by slow or fast air. Just like in WW2 to the Gulf Wars. Airpower will wipe any tank out with ease. Any anti-missile defense systems would be useless against dumb, cluster or smart bombs and or cannon fire like the 30mm gun on the A10 etc. The T14 is just too big, too tall and would make a huge target when hull down. If you look and next gen western tanks like the German K51 panther, Japanese Type 10 or the next American MBT. Small, fast and stealthy is the way to go.

I really liked object 195. Armata took a lot from this project. Important technologies have been developed. Let it possibly remain in small quantities, but at least it is mass-produced and can very significantly complement the current tank formations in the role of a commander's tank.

@eaglewatch0783

Жыл бұрын

I did a google search to see what you're talking about, and I've gotta say, I do enjoy the look of Object 195. Looks like a pretty slim tank as well

@VFella

Жыл бұрын

You mean the tank formations like the one yesterday in Vulhedar? Or do you mean the tank formations on Red Square? In this case, if the T-14 was the commander's tank, then the towing vehicle was surely his field aid, LOL. Maybe they will go to fight with one of these towing vehicles close by, like the fearsome Aircraft Carrier the Admiral Kuznetsov XD

@juanfiorino6837

Жыл бұрын

Denis,eso nunca va a ocurrir y si ocurre se van a tener que poner lejos del alcance de las municiones Excalibur y Bonus,si no se retiran pronto de Ucrania,las cosas se les van a poner muy feas

@TheManinBlack9054

Жыл бұрын

@@VFella you really had to be a jerk to him, didnt you?

The MiG-25 Foxbat of the 20xx's

@tremedar

Жыл бұрын

More like the maus of the 20xx's.

@Tamburello_1994

Жыл бұрын

@@tremedarUm, no. Back when the Foxbat was used to scare westerners of the awesome new fighter jet the Soviet's had produced. Same with the Backfire bomber. It really has nothing to do with the tank itself, but the illusion of awesomeness T-14 has been given.

I had a change to see the T14 up close in Russia. What puzzles me to this day is the turret: instead of the edges of the sides align, the whole corner was made out of welding seams!!! That cannot be a good solution?!

@Statek63

Жыл бұрын

Because these were mock-ups not real turrets ?

Can you please do a video of different shocking tales of survival? With Juliane Koepcke, Phineas Gage, The man who survived for days in Africa dehydrated with his legs pinned beneath a plane (i forgot his name)? And definitely my favourite, Aron Ralston

Sure, the Armata looks good - on paper, but given the Russian limitations with high-tech systems I very much doubt that it's anything more than a paper tiger. The crew may be fairly well protected, but I doubt the effectiveness of the anti-missile defences and think that top-down attack munitions will still kill these tanks. They retain the auto-loader/carousel system and will be just as vulnerable to ammo cooking off after being hit as their older tanks. No hatches or blast panels means their turrets will fly high when hit.

@milan51259

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your expertise on this topic, all knowing anonymous troll.

@silimarina.

Жыл бұрын

@@milan51259 dont cry russian troll

@silimarina.

Жыл бұрын

@@KyPc0p crew maybe will survive, but the tank would still be destroyed. And that's the point in the battlefield, to eliminate equipment.

It was just in the news that Armata will not be mass produced, as the factory for it is empty of machinery. Sanctions prevented the start of the production, as said machines were supposed to be Western, and even with those, lack of electrical components were the final nail to the coffin. Those already existing were so expensive to make, as they are hand built, that the whole project has been shelved at least for now. So, Armata is the Paper Kitten of the Paper Tiger. A promising curiosity.

Russia says it has 20 of these, ten are proto types according to Russia.

I can only imagine the Lovecraftian scene of a T-14 lavatory after 10+ years in service....

Great detailed video of the armata

"If reports are true" that one got me hard🤣

5:11 ayo look at that lowwrider STRV design XD

Ukrainians seeing T-14: "Wow. Cool. Taras, pass the Javelin."

The T-14 Armata is a Russian main battle tank based on the Armata Universal Combat Platform. The Russian Army initially planned to acquire 2,300 T-14s between 2015 and 2020. By 2018, production and fiscal shortfalls delayed this to 2025, before Russia announced the apparent cancellation of the main show run on 30 July 2018. However, as of 2021, the Russian state-owned TASS media agency claimed the Armata had been expected to begin serial production in 2022, with the delivery of a test batch of 100 to the 2nd Guards Tamanskaya Motor Rifle Division expected to begin in 2022. The tanks are planned to only be officially transferred after completing all state tests. In December 2021 the Russian state conglomerate Rostec stated that serial production had commenced, with "more than 40" Armata tanks anticipated to be delivered to Russian troops after 2023.

It looks great on paper. Still yet to be proven.

@stevenmike1878

Жыл бұрын

just like the maus 🤣

on 5:13 the armata's gun seems a bit.. um.. detached 😂

Think of it this way the design of the tank still has its major week spot with the bottom plate on the body

5:12 that is one unique gun, in protrudes from the hull.

@konaonpalannut9723

Жыл бұрын

It's the new tank destroyer model XD

@hankjones3527

Жыл бұрын

Lol, so it does. Good spotting.

This tank is great, now upgrade the infantry

thats some quick uploading simple history

Great video, it's on paper a nice tank but too little in known about it. It definitly has quite a bit of nice features to it, but the numbers are just too little to have an impact. And since russian doctrine is more about numbers than about survivalbility or technology I guess we won't see a lot of them in action.

@bl4k4tt84

Жыл бұрын

Well the tank is similar to the t64 in regards of doctrine it being a more technologically advance then it’s closed Russian counterparts

@sam8404

Жыл бұрын

Russia still fights like it's WW2.

@milsimmaniac711

Жыл бұрын

The t14 is a change in doctrine from their previous vehicles that's why it's modular and has mbt spg ifv variants etc

@Lonech

Жыл бұрын

@@sam8404 and now they are inching so much closer to the T-34 once the T-55's they're fielding now get blasted to smitherenes by drone data linking or some other funny artillery.

the truth is that tanks are never obselete they need infantry support for survivability especially in urban areas but realistically 1 amazing tank crews can probably really turn the tide a battle.

@cosmosyn2514

Жыл бұрын

I mean, I’d say they could be obsolete in a tank on tank engagement, but against infantry? Definitely. Even Great War era tanks would still be a force to be reckoned with in that case if properly supported by infantry.

@Lonech

Жыл бұрын

Unless they field completely inferior munitions that can't penetrate modern armor designs. And if they don't have working thermals they might as well be dead in the modern age.

now that we have the armata i think it'd be nice to make a video about the M84 series of MBTs (yugoslav and later Serb tanks), also M91 "Vihor"

@SnappBacc

Жыл бұрын

Yes

yalls should do factions from interwar cold war and modern present current day

A video about the challenger tanks series would be a great video

@warriorson7979

Жыл бұрын

You mean "Britain's new threat." ?🤔

Most probably the absense of those tanks in an actual warfare may be caused by two factors: распил and откат

1:13 It's not "zavor" but "Uralvagonzavod" meaning "a factory (zavod) for wagons (vagons)(and if necessary tanks) on Ural"...

Not sure, We'll have to see how well it tosses it's turret. 👀

From what we know from the Ukraine war, it probably has layered cardboard armor and uses a big super soaker cannon.

@vladpoluektov2217

Жыл бұрын

Who told you that?

@unlitnorth4097

Жыл бұрын

@@vladpoluektov2217 The Russians can't even supply body armor to their troops, so it having cardboard armor makes sense

@vladpoluektov2217

Жыл бұрын

@Unlit North why specifically cardboard? Why bot plastic? Or just metal? Or anything?, you just make no sense, you westees just keep making up you facts! I wanna see it!

@ATankEnjoyer

Жыл бұрын

@@unlitnorth4097Thé incident being referred to is when T-72B3s and T-80BVMs were found abandoned with the "soft ERA" bags that can be attached to the side of these tanks. The bags were opened and found to contain cardboard. To be fair the cardboard is supposed to be there to hold the ERA bricks in the bag. The problem is the ERA itself wasn’t there. So you might as well say it’s cardboard armour.

@OlDanTucker

Жыл бұрын

@@ATankEnjoyer it was proven by red effect that the era was scavenged before theses “reports” where given

I would see myself driving a T14 Armata. The designs are super sharp. For me really, the bells and whistles on it bring a lot of revolutionary innovations. Sure the treads would leave some scratches on the pavement. All it needs are some cameras for the blind spots, cameras for the front and rear of the tank, and you have a custom tank. Put some rubber tank tread pads, and thr tank can be more traversable. With some precision maneuvering. The name i would put for my ideal tank, the karen hunter

5:36 those are the smoke launchers, the APS is on the side above the turret

New generation tank t-14 Armata is so good, that it fails to start at a parade 😎

@Nikolaievich9837

Жыл бұрын

And Abrams are any better?

@georgiybelobrov7331

Жыл бұрын

@@Nikolaievich9837 i suppose you are ruzzian, so even if i prove to you that Abrams are better you will still not believe it. Plus why tf you speak English, isnt it "WeSterN lAngUagE eWwwW"

@Nikolaievich9837

Жыл бұрын

@@georgiybelobrov7331 ya cause there’s videos of javelins bouncing off Russian tanks. Meanwhile Iraq is literally a graveyard of Abrams. Yes western language is ew that’s why I’m speaking it to you because of I speak to you in Russian your gonna be like ewwwww “Russian orc”

sir what would happen if camera on tank damage during combat situation?😅

T14 is a great bit of Kit trouble is RF doesn’t have the money to produce enough of them

The Ruzzian high tech tow hooks fitted to the tank work incredibly well, the red square parade showed their effectiveness to the world, stunning design allowed the prompt use and deployment, The LADA of MBT's

@tankeriv

Жыл бұрын

The dumbest comment on topic. That tank didn't broke down. It had the hand brake on. And the driver wasn't trained on that specific tank. But it's nice how so once in a while this argument comes up to bash a tank where people know just about nothing about.

@zwojack7285

Жыл бұрын

@@tankeriv sure thing, Tovarisch

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

Жыл бұрын

@@zwojack7285 he is right. You bots always amazes me. Same with Su-57 S calling all the names and hate of that beautiful plane, terminators, etc all the new stuff Russia is using it. What else you guys will continue to claim before Russia disappoints you again?

@tankeriv

Жыл бұрын

@@helicoidsniffer1303 B.S. it was a handbrake issue and that was made clear shortly after it happened and clearly explained. Then again. Lets assume you are right.. We are talking about a new platform here. Every new system has its issues. But when taking all features into account it is probably the worlds most modern tank in active service today.

Жыл бұрын

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 Bet you will not say the say of the kremlin bots saying the same under Videos of US weapons. But Muh Russia!

The reason it's called the "T-14 Armata" is that they could only afford to build 14 of them.

@baky6003

Жыл бұрын

and why did they build 25?

@Lonech

Жыл бұрын

@@baky6003 cause 11 of them broke down due to engine failures

@baky6003

Жыл бұрын

@@Lonech Armata's problems are in the power plant, an opticolocation complex and an incoming projectile detection system. These problems were identified during tests in Syria, the tank has not yet been put into service and the contract for the production of more than 145 units (30 units in total) has been suspended due to outstanding debts of the plant.

Even if it will hit the front, it most likely end up like that Terminator tank.

@captainchimp

Жыл бұрын

yup, Russian army cant even use its own equipment how it was designed. The Terminator should have been used in a close infantry support role and in an urban environment, that's exactly what it was designed for. But what did they do with it? they left it in a wide open field and it got shelled.

Idea for the Next Video about next Generation Tanks: KF51 Panther.

I think that if the allied tank is experienced anough, they can stick a round into the turret ring jamming it, it looks very exposed for a main battle tank. The turret looks very "weak".

@driveapanzerpal7472

Жыл бұрын

Unlike in video games, tanker aren't shooting at 'weak point's.' Generally if you are engaging enemy armor you're not gonna shoot at specific area's but rather center mass because waiting to fire is going to get you killed. The first to fire and hit usually wins, not matter if the shot penetrates or not because now the enemy crew knows you have the range figured out and never know if the next round will penetrate or not and no one wants to take that risk

@elliotsmith102

Жыл бұрын

The turret doesn’t have any armour lol

@lucked298

Жыл бұрын

@@driveapanzerpal7472 but hes a keyboard tank commander what are you on about😂

@strategiccommander4736

Жыл бұрын

meanwhile abrams with same weak spot: 🥲

@andrasbeke3012

Жыл бұрын

Vets from the ukraine war confirm that this is not a thing. You fire as soon as you have a clear shot. You dont aim for weak spots if your life is in danger. Tank rounds are sufficient to penetrate most tanks at close range, so most hits will do enough damage to disable a tank or dishearten the crew

The new abrams reportedly can transform into the f35. It's true.

Is it necessary for every tank to crush every car in it's way?

1:50 Not necessarily: if you have a rear vehicle with the same chassis as a frontline tank, that's a lot of material you need to maintain it as opposed to a light vehicle chassis.

@declancotter722

8 ай бұрын

Plus the extra fuel requirements, tank is useless if your enemy is destroying your fuel trucks and depos for sport like Ukraine.

t14 can't even go in parades without breaking down I am more scared of a t34 with thermal vision than a t14

@hansgulayev7320

Жыл бұрын

cope

@planderlinde1969

Жыл бұрын

@@hansgulayev7320 That isn't cope the T14 literally broke down while in a parade.

@DokuganRyu28

Жыл бұрын

@@planderlinde1969 It was driver error

@RNKel1

Жыл бұрын

@@hansgulayev7320 facts outweigh ‘coping’ in every argument

@dew7025

Жыл бұрын

@@DokuganRyu28 how was it a driver error

I don’t think ‘laser guided’ munitions are considered state of the art anymore

great video man

I may be young but I've even taken an interest into military engineering , and I'm working on a project known as the KPz a8 / Leviathan tiger , it has a 183 mm a gun with a high-velocity 75 mm a gun very similar in length to the pz IV g , h and js 75 that has the capability of firing apfsds heat fs and solid shot aphe , the 75 mm gun Can-Am left and right five degrees up and down 10 to 12 degrees individually and separately from the 183 mm , the reason why so that way range-finding at a distance is a lot easier because both of the guns will have two different shell distances , mostly due to the weight , size , and shape of the shell , and most tanks that have two guns both guns aim evenly even if they're two separate calibers, the other thing is is that I want to make this Leviathan three men operated as well , one man can control everything in the turret due to the fact that most thing is electronically controlled with remotes , there will be omnidirectional cameras with thermal and night vision optics , there will be anti-aircraft auto guns that can also be used as anti infantry which also have the capability of firing apfsds and APDS , there will be two different models one of them being for supporting infantry and even carrying infantry and the other one will be a mix between an infantry fighting vehicle and a mbt , the Leviathan tiger will also have a 25 mm minigun that is remote controlled and can be pulled into the hatch so that way I could be easily reloaded , along with a 20 mm gun on the back very similar to the one that the k pz-70 has in the first place , the tank will have over 200 millimeters of solid steel in the front 150 ml of solid steel on the sides and 100 on the back , on the turret face will have 300 mm on the sides and rear are all going to be 150 mm , the tank will have a composite screening bolted onto it , along with having a bunch of era that is equivalent to 30 mm each piece and each piece of era is bolted onto a triangular piece of bolted on metal that is also bolted on top of the composite screening lol so you get protection from heat fs and sabot , it will have a system very similar to the one that's on the Black Knight ircm defense basically , one of the interesting things that I want to mention is that it'll only have 45 rounds for the main caliber gun but can carry 60, 75 mm rounds and the 183 mm gun can fire barrel fired anti-tank guided missiles , the problem is is that I have a weight issue and a price problem with this tank as it's going to cost almost thirty-five million per unit with the amount of over-engineering on doing but the point of this tank is not to have many it's to have one tank that can do everything and be even more supportive in a squad with four other tanks with the Leviathan tiger being the heavy tank out of the entire group basically that can also speed up and catch up to medium battle tanks /mbts hopefully I can get the idea patented because I feel like the Abrams is a good tank with the United States military need something new and refreshing I understand the term if it ain't broke don't fix it but if a 20 mm a gun from WWII can pierce the rear side of an Abrams I really don't think the Abrams is the best tank on the field especially with Sweden and Germany and Russia coming out with new prototypes same as China that not only look like they will tear into the Abrams but will literally tear into the abrams lol thank you to anybody who is reading my comment good luck to everybody and may you all find peace in your domains

@kovak4576

Жыл бұрын

Too big,too slow,too electronic and too expensive.But most importantly why? Why would you need a massive tank in modern times,its agility war out there.Also remember war is numbers game,35 million is just crazy

Ukrainian Farmers: "wow the latest tractor variant looks great!"

The T-14 armata is starting to become a pipe dream for the Russian military seeing that it’s still not in active service and how it still is constantly falling short of its demands. The first time this tank showed itself during the parade, one of them ended up breaking down in the middle of the parade rehearsals and had to be towed away. And even if 132 have supposedly been delivered, it’s likely that only around of tenth of that are fully operational. Yet the ones that are apparently operational are still in the pre-production phase. And with Russia being heavily sanctioned since the war in Ukraine, it’s very unlikely that we’ll even see more of these rolling off the production lines anytime soon since Russia relies on western components for the military equipment, including its most modern ones like the T-14.

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Жыл бұрын

Witch components say please. And names of components?

@volodyameshkov1469

Жыл бұрын

Я живу в России, и нам санкции ничего не сделали😅 Не переживай, друг Т 14 ещё себя покажет). Смысла использовать новейшие танки в данное военное время нет, потому что вся эта военная "помощь" нацистам (!), никак не помогает. Вопрос: зачем тратить новые танки?) Это первое А второе, это то, что "западных" компонентов там никогда не было и не будет)

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Жыл бұрын

@@volodyameshkov1469 единственный раз это французская матрица на оптику в т-62

@Jknight416

Жыл бұрын

@@user-lz8qo2ie7s components like semiconductors, which are essential for the most modern military equipment which are now sanctioned from Russia by the west.

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Жыл бұрын

@@Jknight416 And why, then, is the T-90M and Armata still being produced?

Great explanation