can't believe that you are doing this for free...great work god bless!!

@FeelFreetoLearn

3 жыл бұрын

I am more than just grateful for your blessings and well wishes sir.

@venky_MSD

Жыл бұрын

​@@FeelFreetoLearn to

@mekalapoojitha2171

2 ай бұрын

​@@FeelFreetoLearnsir this some not topic is quite confusing sir would you please once briefly explain the same topic sir..

@sanjaybogarla3352

2 ай бұрын

​@@FeelFreetoLearnIn second question if there is an conclusion like " some cycle are not paper " Then the answer will be true or false??

@sanjaybogarla3352

2 ай бұрын

​@@FeelFreetoLearnIn second question if there is an conclusion like " some cycle are not paper " Then the answer will be true or false??

Comparing to lesson 1/2/3 some not is quite difficult.

@sameerkumar1434

3 жыл бұрын

I also felt same

@kavyasri448

3 жыл бұрын

I too felt same

@poosaalarajendrachary8428

3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@shubhammathuriya3773

3 жыл бұрын

Sbke sath yhi hal h

@Raj-ts8lw

3 жыл бұрын

Same 😂😂😂

This is the first time i am watching this syllogism video and ket me tell u guys i am a person who comes from a BPL background and studying without coaching classes and always afraid of syllogism but once i saw this sir's video, it has completely eradicate my fear of syllogism and i am thanking you sir from the bottom of my heart❤️❤️❤️

The effort and dedication you have put into making these video lecture series are remarkable. Thank you very much, sir.

@FeelFreetoLearn

3 жыл бұрын

I’m overwhelmed by your kind words madam, thank you.

@owaismajeed99

Ай бұрын

Some red are not yellow...I think there is a possibility of connecting red with yellow.. please clearfy if I m wrong

The Greatest teacher ever on KZread. An angel sent by god to spread knowledge to the mankind.

@FeelFreetoLearn

3 жыл бұрын

Your kind words and remarks are my inspiration, thank you sir.

@santanubehera2937

2 жыл бұрын

@@FeelFreetoLearn Hello Sir, What would happen to option 2 if we connect a circle connecting both black and yellow? Is this possible? We are not violating the given statements. 15:14

All the videos presented by you are very supportive and helpful and crystal clear too. I recommend everyone to follow his videos , doesn't matter if you are learning new or not.

Sir your way of teaching is really appreciable .. it's really so helpful thank you so much

@rajnijamba3128

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir ..😊😊😊

@bhavanishankar1187

4 жыл бұрын

Shall I Have your number

@mohamedsuhail3365

3 жыл бұрын

Boby be our bhabhi

@Shantannuu

3 жыл бұрын

@ yeah exactly 🙄

@akshaywagh618

3 жыл бұрын

Yes really Boby

I saw all the 4 lessons and now I feel like I can solve any question of syllogism. Saying just thank you would never suffice. 🙏🙏

This video is perfectly correct without a single mistake..Bcoz i watched from first lesson onwards and when i paused the video and tried for answers,few answers came wrong compared to his answers.But when I observed carefully when he is doing the answer,then i understood where i was doing mistakes.Only thing is you have to listen each and every single word what he is telling carefully and most importantly u must trust him.

@narenyt4683

4 жыл бұрын

Ummm.... There is no way to trust without understanding Wat he is explaining.... From lesson 1 to 3 it was easy to understand but in this video lots of confusiona and contradictions... Surely I want to clear things up to think that he is explaining crtly... If he doesn't clear all doubts in comment section then this video is upto no good....

@SurajKumar-dj4tc

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah absolutely undeniably indeed correct 👍👍

@prernasrivastava538

3 жыл бұрын

No it's not correct sir were putting no concept instead of some not......

@sathyaashok7971

3 жыл бұрын

@@narenyt4683 yep we will see possibility wise means some red is possible with yellow ri8 but here he says not possible with yellow in this example. but previous methods and lesaons he follows what i said above he doesn't follow in this example

At 7:12 In the conclusion statement 1- some paper are not cycle You took the some portion on right side but you can also take it to left where tree is present And then there is possibility that some paper are cycle by drawing cycle with the tree, paper and cycle

@aaradhyasingh7984

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly. I was also thinking that.

@ashwanthkumar4101

5 жыл бұрын

Yes same problem

@saiajay2934

2 ай бұрын

Yes I have been thinking about it..! I'm just here to clarify and i was right thanks.. ❤

@priyaprincy2650

5 күн бұрын

We have to check the possibility of the statement is true or not. Have to check all possibility to prove it. In this case, right side we can say this region(some paper) is not cycle. So that is enough to say statement is correct.

Thank u sir, really i appreciate your efforts, i was initially confused about syllogism but by seeing this videos, i go in ecstasy... Thank u sir

the best part of the videos is ..basic se lekar advanced tak...and u r teaching calmly

I wish I had given all my money spent on online coaching to support him to come up with more videos like this, to many peeps ... What a beautiful lecture series

Thanks for some not cases best understand from your words.. Marks increasing from ur vides..

I have seen a lot of videos of syllogisms but the one I understood the most is sir's class👌👌👌👏👏👏 Thank you sir🙏🙏🙏

Hats off this teacher ....I have so many confusion on this topic ...no one teaches this topic better than u on this u tube platform

your way of explanation is very good 😘🙏🙏

In the second question, the 'some paper' part is told to be the region b/w paper and pen, but not paper and tree, on the basis of which the first conclusion is said to be true. 6:38, 7:02 If we take the latter region as 'some paper', the conclusion would be false. But in the 4th question, 'some red' part is considered to be the common region b/w black and red, thus proving the second conclusion to be true. 15:14, 15:29 If the same logic, as in Q.2, is applied in Q.4, the 2nd conclusion in Q.4 would be wrong. Please clear this doubt.

@learnwithhazim

2 жыл бұрын

yes bro same confusion

@abchalkaur2258

2 жыл бұрын

i had same doubt

@mitalentcreations8523

2 жыл бұрын

I have same confusion

@aaliyamalik1256

2 жыл бұрын

@@mitalentcreations8523 actually the thing is you have to go according to venn diagrams.. See the qstn 2, the ist statement is 'some trees are paper ' and see the pattern of diagram which you draw for this statement ' you draw a circle namely tree and through its little area you draw another one which is paper and obviously that is some tree and will not be considered as some paper. And in question 4 , you see there similarly the region between black and red will be considered as black region and there is no any ' some' region of red, it is the whole 'some' Or you can say all 'some' and do the question accordingly hope you will get me.

@Shinebrightlikeastar

2 жыл бұрын

My question is in the 4 question why we are considering that part between red and black to see if it is not yellow . We can also make red as it overlaps yellow . In that case some red will be yellow and conclusion some red are not yellow would hv been wrong . Pls explain anyone .

I have just finished this fourth lesson and I am eternally grateful for your help. I have an upcoming exam in a week and now I feel so prepared and confident thanks to your channel. Keep up the amazing work sir, you are the best teacher on youtube

i love this video... finally bcoz of this video only i got to know the fullest concept of Same not case.. Thank you so much sir..

Hi sir, It's because of youh I have got some hope on myself that I'm able to crack ssc cgl nd as well as my GATE exam. The way you explain is beyond words sir. Thank you tons. A good teacher is hard to find An educative teacher is rare to find But A great teacher like YOU is beyond sky nd earth to find.

@FeelFreetoLearn

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for stopping by to leave this very kind remarks on my teaching , madam.

I cannot thank you enough, concepts got clarified in few minutes. Now I think Some not is the easiest of them all.

The best videos on syllogism in KZread.

One of the best teacher I have ever seen

Awesome teaching sir... Big fan of yours ☺😊😇

My question is when to apply possibility case in 'Some Not' questions In Q2 conclusion 1 will be false coz in possibility case Some Cycle can be Paper

@Wizzzuu

3 жыл бұрын

yes i also have the same one

@vivekbhatt3166

2 жыл бұрын

Yes I also confused

@eklavyasingh8143

2 жыл бұрын

u found any way?

Amazing concept! So kind of u that u are providing this amazing lectures for free🙏

Thank you so much sir i really appreciate your hardwork.. So much clarity in your videos 🙏 i liked all videos of syllogism even i have syllabus of 5 classes only 😊

thank you very much sir 💖 Syllogism was little bit tough for me but after watching "FFL" vidoes "MENTORS GUIDE" videos I am feeling like a expert 😇

This concept is little bit difficult than the previous three concepts.😭

These videos are more helpful for my study....👌👌 Thank you so much sir🙏🙏🙏 All my concepts in syllogisms are now cleared

Thank you sir from the bottom of my heart ♥ This is best series on syllogism

If any one is confused with some not question then please first watch the "15 imp questions of syllogism for IBPS" in this video sir has explained some not concept in detail........watch from 8th question

@renjarlajagan2361

5 жыл бұрын

In which video..?

@renukapailwan3925

5 жыл бұрын

@@renjarlajagan2361 "15 imp question of syllogism for IBPS"

@renukapailwan3925

5 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4WBtruiecbMnqQ.html

@sirishanallanukala6756

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you for throwing light it really helped me

@theexplorer1030

5 жыл бұрын

Get confused ...

Sir, in question 4 in this video, "some red " region can be made with yellow .......like some portion in black , and some in yellow,. Then why conclusion 2 of Q 4 is true??

@pratyushapediredla1031

3 жыл бұрын

Because 'some red' region have black also.. so it cannot be made with yellow

@nareshreddy9152

3 жыл бұрын

@@pratyushapediredla1031 then why some red are not green is false, already some red are black

@shankhashubhradas1349

3 жыл бұрын

@@nareshreddy9152 because some green can be black and red as well,, but the conclusion says the opposite that's why its false

@hrithiksonu5836

2 жыл бұрын

According to the conclusion "Some Red are not yellow" is true because Like you said other region of red can be intersected with yellow is also true, but understand the conclusion written "Some Red are not yellow" They have Mentioned "Some" which means some are true, doesn't matter whether others are false... I hope you get it

@saiteja2386

2 жыл бұрын

Conclusion 2 is true because from statement 4 it is clear that some black are red and some red are black... In some red ( some black is also present which is not in relation with yellow) ... Hope u understand thanku... 😀

Sir... Some not topic chala Baga understand ayindhi ..tq ..sir Super.....

Sir really u help lot of people. who are preparing for exams .ur way of teaching is really awesome every one can understand easily thank you thank you .u r videos are very helpful to me.

Hello Sir, There is mistake at 13:40, Actually good's some region is already with Best, so there is possibility to connect chocolate with good's some region. hence it is "false"

@divyapenubala555

4 жыл бұрын

Same doubt for me

@lakshmangundapu2644

4 жыл бұрын

@@divyapenubala555 can anyone clariffy

@iamgirish

4 жыл бұрын

Same doubt please help someone

@mdjawedansari3154

3 жыл бұрын

Watch again ..

@PraveenKumar-kd1zo

2 жыл бұрын

No sweet is chocolate and all the sweet are goods. Hence some goods are sweet. So that some goods cannot be chocolate.

Best concept and best explanation, Thanks Sir

Thank you sir, I have clearly understood the topic of SOME NOT, seen so many videos..but couldn't quite Grasp the topic ..but now I understood...thank you so much sir ..

Thankyou so much sir. This video helped me alot😊 keep sharing sir. God bless you abundantly.

Sir, all the 10 videos of syllogism are very good and it helps in understanding the concept very easily and quick. Can you pls give more videos on statement assumption/argument/conclusion and other logical reasoning videos? That would be very kind of you and beneficial for the learners. Thank you

Sir we need more topics to learn like inequality, input output , data suffi ,alphanumeric etc.....sir you r d best teacher i ever come across...love from mumbai...!!😍

Sir..... I love the way you teach ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️. Sir, i have so much confusion in syllogism but after watching your videos, my all confusion had clear... Thank you so much sir... ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Sir your teaching style appreciable. ❤️❤️❤️❤️

15:32 some red can be connected with yellow in a possible diagram and if not then it will contradict to12:12 some chocolate are not good.

@madhankaran9445

3 жыл бұрын

I think there is correction on conclusion 3 ( 12:12 )..

@nischithadd1876

3 жыл бұрын

Even I got this doubt. Sir please try to answer for this doubt.

@manisharabidas9563

3 жыл бұрын

I was wandering the same.. Because it's possible that some red is yellow...

Eight persons R, Q, P, O, Y, X, U and N are sitting in two parallel rows having four person in each row in such a way that there is an equal distance between the persons who sit adjacent to one another. Four of them are facing south and four of them are facing north. Therefore in the given seating arrangement each member seated in a row faces another member of the other row. They all have different heights and lives on different floors of the same building having eight floors, but not necessarily in the same order. X is seated second to the right of the person who is fourth tallest. X faces the person, who lives on Eighth floor. R is not the fourth and the second tallest person. The second tallest person is seated opposite to the one who sits third to the left of O. Either R or O lives on Seventh floor. Q sits to the immediate left of N who is taller than U. The one who lives on Fourth floor sits diagonally opposite to the person who lives on First floor. N does not live on Fourth and Fifth floor. Q is taller than P. The person who lives on Second floor sits immediate left of the person, who faces the person who is the tallest. Q is not an immediate neighbour of X. The one who lives on First floor sits second to the right of the person who lives on Sixth floor. The shortest person does not sit at any of the extreme ends of the rows. Only two persons are sitting between P and the fifth tallest person. Third shortest person sits opposite to the second tallest person. The third tallest person sits to the immediate right of P, who is not an immediate neighbour of the fourth tallest person. R is seated third to the left of the second tallest person. P is not the fourth tallest person. U sits opposite to one, who is an immediate neighbour of R. X and Q are not facing each other. O is facing towards North direction. U is not the tallest. The persons who live on fourth floor and eighth floor are facing each other. please tell me this type of puzzles

@lakebaikal5

6 жыл бұрын

h

@indumathy91

5 жыл бұрын

Vijay Bhaskar K check in youtube for seating arrangemebt

You are absolutely best teacher . Your explanation techniques are absolutely great

I just want to thank you😌 I never understood this chapter from any teacher but you made it so clear😌

12:55 Statement 4- Some Goods are Best, so basically we have another "Some" part of Good connected with Best. why we can't connect Chocolate in the intersection part between Goods and Best?

@basavarajd6641

3 жыл бұрын

Same doubt i too hv

@Masseytractorsdsr

3 жыл бұрын

because we have to prove some good is not chochlate that is true, we dont"t want to prove that some good is choclate

@basavarajd6641

3 жыл бұрын

@@Masseytractorsdsr if we could have been proved some good is also chocolate then it is also true only na

@Masseytractorsdsr

3 жыл бұрын

@@basavarajd6641 bro i didn't get your point.

@basavarajd6641

3 жыл бұрын

If we connect chocolate intersection part between goods and best Is it wrong??

hie sir, i really like your class the facts and logic to solve are very well explained by you. Sir, i am facing difficulty with question no.2 time (7:22) in the same video as you have taken for 1 st conclusion that SoME PAPER ARE NOT CYCLE:- in this you have taken some part of paper shared by pen why u have not taken some paper part with tree side . If we take from tree side some part then the conclusion for possible diagram will become wrong. pls help. thanku for such good clarification on syllogism topic.

@shubhamrawat4188

3 жыл бұрын

I had the same problem but i figured it out. See, for 1st conclusion, the portion that had taken by sir is the resultant of 2nd statement. And for the 3rd conclusion, the shared part(some part) had taken is the resultant of statement 1. i.e. The "some paper" Portion is only the one which is shared with truck, not the one shared with tree.

@vanshikathakur9345

Жыл бұрын

Can you guys suggest a book to practice reasoning?!

@Kavikavi-xf8cf

Жыл бұрын

Did get the proper answer fr ur question...if yes... Pls explain... Becz I too have the same doubt...

@vivekkarthic7323

Жыл бұрын

That is some tree not some paper

You are such a good presenter…. Things becomes easy❤️

Sir, You are the best Teacher. After Watching your videos I started liking Mathematics & Reasoning. Thank you Sir 💯🙌

Thank you for making this information available. However, I am confused about when to use the center of a circle instead of the perimeter of a circle to illustrate the possibility of two parameters having a relationship. At 12:44 - the diagram shows two conflicting methods for illustrating a "SOME" relationship. SOME GOODS is shown as an area in the center of the circle (while he is validating conclusion #3). However, the same diagram shows SOME CHOCOLATE as an area on the perimeter of GOODS the circle (while he is validating conclusion #2). Is there a rule that specifies when we must use the center of a circle instead of the perimeter of a circle in the Venn diagram for SOME relationships? If there is a rule, can someone please explain it or provide a link to the rule. I have followed this series on Syllogism from the first video and I cannot find an answer to my question.

Sir pls explain if " some not " is present in statement

thank you so much sir

Thanks sir for making this video .. earlier I was very confused at this concept .. now I understand .. so thank you so much

In question 3, I think the intersection of goods and best should also mean 'some goods'. If so, then conclusion 3 should be false. Revert back with an explaination.

@gvenkatarao2412

4 жыл бұрын

Ha s

@revathi5983

3 жыл бұрын

S

@mygoogleaccount2159

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly that was my doubt.

@arunmozhibalamurali3910

3 жыл бұрын

I also got the same answer

@sss-xc6nu

3 жыл бұрын

Some good is except the outer good region, so inner good is taken. And best falls in outer good region which is not the some part of good, conclusion is some good so the inner part

Please watch the previous videos, because this video is right. For those having confusion whether to see BASIC or POSSIBLE DIAGRAM, in some "not" concept:- even if one between basic and possible diagram is a cross ( or false) it means conclusion DOES NOT follow. > It's the same as Lesson 2, the "NO" concept which is applied here, where even if one between basic and possible diagram is cross (or false) the conclusion does not follow I hope this makes it clear.

Thank You sir ! Best Teaching ✌ Got Cleared becz of u sir ! Worth watching 👍

U are the best for every competitive exams...tq so much...best teacher I have ever seen...

Sir In que no 1 You said "some papers are not marker" is correct But it is not required to asume the intersecting area of paper and scale only, as "some paper"

@ajithkumarm4960

5 жыл бұрын

Wat's the answer for question no 1.....plzzzz reply me

@creativebooth3140

5 жыл бұрын

yes u r right ..... he confused me too also.... he is wrong in this....

@fangtruth

4 жыл бұрын

first off all ......marker cannot connect or intersect with pen nd scale so he must connect with paper if he want" some" sector or term .. marker doesnt have any" some" sector.so his value is 100%free paper has" some "sector.. thats why he doesnt have value of 100% free or for easy we can say it has 50%.. nd his some part are intersecting with scale or pen so that why some paper can be not marker but some marker can be paper or 50% cannot be 100% but 100% can be 50%..(100% = marker nd...... 50%=paper)

@abarnabalasubramaniam9618

4 жыл бұрын

@@fangtruth so finally what is the answer?? Is 1st conclusion wrong or right.. Can u explain it

✳️sir thanks for dis video ...Make a video on 'few' & " only a few ",, before rrb po

@prasannapodugu7936

3 жыл бұрын

Those come under some

God Bless You sir.... I wish God give you more strength to do this good work

Thank you so much sir. Ur method of teaching is fantastic

Good afternoon sir. Sir I have one doubt in syllogism Please solve the following question P1: No non-literates are graduates P2: All non-graduates are non-teachers C1: All teachers are non-literates C2: All teachers are graduates C3: All non-teachers are non-graduates C4: No non-literate is a teacher Find the valid conclusion Please explain answer for this question

Sir in question no 4 green has two some region which one is correct choice

This level of content shouldn't be free.... Thanks man

Sir thank you because of your lecture videos I got full marks in logical reasoning

SIR In the 2nd question if we draw cycle with paper in possible diagram then conclusion would be wrong. but why didn't we draw like that? why did we decide the conclusion 1 using the basic diagram itself? pls explain sir

@bipros7

6 жыл бұрын

forget about the basic diagram and possibility diagram...In the conclusion 1 it's given that some paper are not cycle...It doesn't said that all paper are not cycle..thats means there is a possibility that some paper might be cycle as well

In the question no.1( lesson-4) From conclusions It seems to be 1 and 3 are nearly same then if the conclusion 1 is right then conclusion 3 should also be right .

@kamaltejmalineni2441

5 жыл бұрын

yes.I too feel the same

@wasimshaikh1444

5 жыл бұрын

It is correct.

@KrishJr13

5 жыл бұрын

Paper comprises pen & scale they dont have relation with marker so marker is connected with paper outside of that pen & scale region

Thank you sir , because i don't know atleast basics but because of you only.......i learn minimum basics from your vedioues i solve questions and get correct answers in any exam thanks a lot no more words ....................

Syllogism is made easy only because of u sir, thanks a lot sir..there is not any single doubt in your lectures👍👍👍, doubts are created only by those naysayers, doubters👎

Lot of confusion in some not consept

@jaikumar-os8hx

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly, in question 4, there is a possible of connecting red with yellow as well as red with green but how we can connect with red with green alone and not with yellow?

@bhavyakt2709

4 жыл бұрын

@@jaikumar-os8hx yes I also doubt with that

@prudhvi9440

4 жыл бұрын

@@jaikumar-os8hx he did a mistake.In that question only conclusion 1 is true

@sankarpandi3532

4 жыл бұрын

@@prudhvi9440 exactly in this question conclusion 1is true

@Hakunamatata-nz3br

4 жыл бұрын

@@prudhvi9440 right

I am confused in the last second question, in the some red part.

you are the great teacher sir...i have ever seen like you.God bless you

Salute to you Sir.... Really good ...useful for beginners...

Sir ur explanation is different in 3rd question 3rd conclusion and 4th question 3rd conclusion

@poojadamodar4025

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, I have also dout in this question

@tejashwinireddypadigela7496

5 жыл бұрын

I too have same day😓

@dikshakalwaar973

5 жыл бұрын

I also have doubt

sir in first exmple (some paper are not marker) is TRUE then why in 2nd exmple (some tree are not cycle) is FALSE

@sara-gy2ic

4 жыл бұрын

That is because in the first examp statement is there as no scale is a marker and paper is attached to the scale hence it's correct Whereas in second exmp conclu some tree are not cycle is wrong bcoz cycle can be paired with tree as tree does not come in the some part of truck.. Hope this helps

@vigneshiyer2424

4 жыл бұрын

@@sara-gy2ic Yes, it is correct. Thanks

@surya4538

3 жыл бұрын

Also paper is connected to tree sir

This feels like a full understand no understand some not understand possibility of understand Thank you sir good effort

Sir thanks a lot.. I've seen so many videos on syllogism..but you are the best teacher for me.again tysm..❤

Sir, In question 2, for conclusion number 1,U have said we can't say some paper are not cycle bcz there is connection between truck and cycle.. But there is a possibility of connecting cycle like u did for conclusion 3.. then we can make paper and cycle are in contact.. So conclusion 1 also not follows right????

@ananthkrrish1730

6 жыл бұрын

Hello sir can we expect explanation for this from your end..?? It's really making me to think,,, I'm confused..!! Apart from this you are doing a brilliant job. Ty.

@user-px5cf2sw8d

6 жыл бұрын

Con-1 does not follow

@wildsoul1199

6 жыл бұрын

We definitely cannot relate either truck or pen or car to the cycle, since those three share a common space with paper... That means there is some paper that is not cycle definetly... So he did not draw possible diagram for it.

@bipros7

6 жыл бұрын

forget about the basic diagram and possibility diagram...In the conclusion 1 it's given that some paper are not cycle...It doesn't said that all paper are not cycle..thats means there is a possibility that some paper might be cycle as well

@vaishnavin7093

5 жыл бұрын

Some paper is already in statement so that (some paper) region is not connected with cycle as cons 1 says the same thing so conclusion 1 is tue

Sir in question number two, in conclusion one as per your view you consider that paper had connection with pen,car and truck and cycle doesn't have connection with truck in this situation conclusion one is true, but we have another connection of paper with tree why we are not taking that part for making decisions wether it is true or false. We can connect cycle with paper that had some with tree. Please explain...as soon as possible I am confused about this... I am from Hyderabad.. I got same doubt in third question in conclusion three.....

@riteshsharma2490

3 жыл бұрын

same to doubt here as well brother

@riteshsharma2490

3 жыл бұрын

why we are considering intersection region of paper and tree as well to find correct answer for Conclusion 1

@aniketa.kambli5207

3 жыл бұрын

Rathod did u found the answer ?? bcz i hv same doubt.

Really I love your teaching style. Thank u sir

Best teacher for aptitude ✍️👍

Some paper are not cycle will also be false conclusion if you are saying some tree are not cycle is true... Coz cycle can have common region in tree paper and cycle

@bm0204

5 жыл бұрын

He has explained things beautifully but this bit got a little vague. In 2 and 3, I think what would help would be for instance in case 2. Some cycles are not tree, so there is a possiblity that the circle of cycle lie completely inside the tree circle thus making the statement false because then all cycles would be tree.

@bm0204

5 жыл бұрын

Similarly in case 3 there is a possibility that the circle for cycle subsumes the circle for tree then in that case all tree will be cycle thus this makes the statement some trees are not cycle false.

@sudheerksk775

4 жыл бұрын

in B.d ,if some not is 100% true and in P.D if it is 100% false ,then we will say SOME NOT conslusion is FALSE.if in B.D ,if it is 100%true and in P.D it is 50% true or 50 %false,then , SOMENOT conclusion is TRUE.(see video complimentary pair (lesson 7 @25:00 mins)

@binodkumarshaw6451

4 жыл бұрын

I agree with you

In the intersection of trees and paper, the region is also counted in "Some Paper" so conclusion 1 is false. some paper in the region of trees and paper can be cycle too... kindly revert sir

@LETSSIMPLY5

4 жыл бұрын

Same doubt

@mujimdundage3042

4 жыл бұрын

Same here too

@praveengadigoppula1475

4 жыл бұрын

Same doubt here bro

@saisunnysai4119

4 жыл бұрын

Same doubt here

@Youstaofficial

3 жыл бұрын

@@saisunnysai4119 bro did you solved your doubt? Kindly tell me i am having same doubt

One man army! Thank you sir...vaalga valamudan!

First time watching this concept confused 😟 but again watching this concept understand clearly 😊👌👌👌👍👍 thank you so muchhhhhhhhh sir 🙏🙏👍

At 6:28 , In intersection of trees and paper, the region is also counted in "Some Paper" so conclusion 1 is false. some paper in region of trees and paper can be cycle too... please clear.

@HARI-nm2iz

4 жыл бұрын

Good question,.. if anyone knows answer.please write it

@Mayank24099

4 жыл бұрын

That is the region of TREE not paper.

@cloud-xv3hy

4 жыл бұрын

i was searching if someone noticed it..there are such issues with previous lessons also!

@nishantgupta3516

4 жыл бұрын

absolutely i am thinking same if he can connect cycles with tree then y he did count some papers are cycles as true.

@famoushae

4 жыл бұрын

@@Mayank24099 how this is the region of tree only?

Sir in question number 1.........for conclusion 1,u told that conclusion 1 satisfies but in conclusion 3 u maid a connection marker to paper...... Than why not we maid a connection same like for conclusion 1..which doesn't not satisfies the conclusion 1.........plz clear it

@akashbagate9789

4 жыл бұрын

Read the conclusion carefully. 1st conclusion says some paper are not marker. We need to check this statement is correct or not. You can see that part of paper can never be marker as "paper" is part of "scale" also ( and which is not connected with marker - read the 3rd statement ) : therefore conclusion 1st is true. Now 3rd conclusion says " Some marker are not paper " so our duty is to check whether " some marker are paper or not... We can see form the diagram that paper and marker can be connected. Best way to solve " some not " questions is by looking at conclusions first word.

@prajjwaljaiswal3419

3 жыл бұрын

@@akashbagate9789 In first Q , (Some paper are not Marker) should be incorrect because without violating statement we can connect Marker to Paper.

Excellent teaching sir.u r great.ur video is very helpful for me.tnq so much... Sir.

This man is a genius.

Sir, In the fourth question Some green are pink and all pink are yellow No yellow is black and some black are red So there will be a region which common in both yellow and green . "Some red are not green " is it true for this?

@shahbazshahkhan1793

5 жыл бұрын

"Some Green are Red" would be true. I think "Some Green are not Red" would also be false. Likewise, some red can be Green. so "Some Red are not Green" is false. As said in the starting of the video, concentrate on the first 2 words of the sentence. *Some Red*

@aryamanjaswal3258

2 жыл бұрын

bro u r right.. I had same doubt

@aryamanjaswal3258

2 жыл бұрын

@@shahbazshahkhan1793 conclusion 3(some red are not green) is correct ... because u see ... some red is black and black is not yellow and some green is also yellow ...so the crossing area of green and yellow is where we can say

some not concept is missing sir😱

U r the best teacher.. Luv the way u explain 🙏

Thank you so much sir.... Ur way of teaching... make so easy syllogism 2 understand.. n Sir U.. speak so gently..

In question 2. Some paper can easily be made cycle by making cycle such a way as it touches paper only part. Conclusion 1 is also false.... Please reply and tell if I am wrong

@genacrazy9704

4 жыл бұрын

Ur absolutely correct total questions a lot of confusion very difficult with this syllogism i think this syllogism subject was wrong

@yashgupta3390

4 жыл бұрын

Are it's not about making area in such a way it's about understanding it in terms of what includes and what excludes. By some paper it means not any paper but the paper which can not be cycle because those paper belong to region which can not be cycle therefore we can say that some paper are not cycle. And seriously I accept that syllogism is full of ambiguities but this guy has really explained it in such a good way that now I'm able to do the questions easily.

@vishnupriyaalaparthi1616

4 жыл бұрын

yash gupta ok u said its not about making region but why cant he use 'some region' of paper as region between tree and paper for conclusion 1 if that is used then 1 conclusion will be wrong na, but he used the region where cycle cannot be connected and said conclusion 1 is right. Please explain

@yashgupta3390

4 жыл бұрын

@@vishnupriyaalaparthi1616 let me check the question at what time is the question we discussing here. He had cleared the concepts in such a perfect manner that from that day till now I haven't made a single mistake in syllogism. And earlier it was like a mess for me.

@yashgupta3390

4 жыл бұрын

@@vishnupriyaalaparthi1616 are dude Kaha confusion that's what I commented. .... The conclusion 1 is any how like this that is some paper not cycle. To yes some paper which is the part of excluded is not cycle. It's that simple.

In second question i have a doubt. For the conclusion Some paper are not cycle ,we can can spot two some paper region..if we consider right side region ,conclusion is true and if we consider left side region,conclusion is false and why did you consider left side and not right side.. .explanation pls

@RajeshKumar-0101

5 жыл бұрын

Cycle can be connected to tree and paper or Both. So that mean conclusion 1 is false

Very nice video ..U made to understand syllogism in a very clear way .Thank U so much

Please do more videos. Whenever iam doubt of concept. I just open this channel and clear my basics. Thankyou