Wait until he hears about i

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Don’t worry I already heard about it

@HJ28_398

Ай бұрын

Wait till he hears about j and k (and -j and -k and ij, ik, ji, jk... jki...... kjijkjij...... you get the 'i'dea)

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

@@HJ28_398 what?

@immortel_0

Ай бұрын

quaternions op in the chat

@Rafael-oq9vu

Ай бұрын

wait until he hears about sedenions

bro really made mass negative 💀.

@clintonezeh7556

Ай бұрын

​@@asmotivationxx01 For their ratio to be negative one of them has to be negative.

@pokejinwwi

Ай бұрын

@@asmotivationxx01 where exactly did he make the ratio of E and M negative?

@pokejinwwi

Ай бұрын

@@asmotivationxx01 but that's not making the ratio of E and M negative, that's making the square root of the ratio between E and M negative. It would be an imaginary number otherwise.

@toshiv1883

Ай бұрын

@@asmotivationxx01 (I know I wrote a lot I am sorry about that) you are confusing energy with workdone negative energy only exists in quantum physics that too theoretically we dont know if it exists or not. This formula is from theory of relativity and back then quantum physics was not a thing, so relativity does not even apply in many situations in the quantum world so ye you can't say the ratio is negative 🥲. One point yes theoretically negitave mass is possible so you maybe right we just don't know yet 🤣

@pokejinwwi

Ай бұрын

@@asmotivationxx01 well thing is potential energy isn't what is in E=mc^2, E in this case is rest energy im pretty sure

Physics university student here. This (plus a couple extra steps) is how Paul Dirac discovered antimatter in 1928. So bro is actually cooking here

@yousefabdelmonem3788

12 күн бұрын

Dirac was my favorite schizo fr

@mrshovelbottom7475

10 күн бұрын

@@yousefabdelmonem3788 I love Dirac notation

Bro managed to get a negative speed of light 💀

@ZAMislive

Ай бұрын

xd

@bitten1406

Ай бұрын

he went in the wrong direction there

@bighnesh0627

28 күн бұрын

@@bitten1406 yeah in the opposite direction lol

@tamandanibanda1017

28 күн бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@kaunghtetkyaw750

27 күн бұрын

Bro. that is how reverse flash appears.

bro went from maths to physics

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Yup

@ethereal_7

26 күн бұрын

Ilr I was like hold man too far where we goin

@danielhomolya897

22 күн бұрын

And before that to meth

Bro started from quadratic direct to E=MC²😂😂😂

@tamandanibanda1017

28 күн бұрын

I'm saying!!!🤣🤣🤣

@ek_minute_

26 күн бұрын

E=MC^2 is actually not a quadratic equation it's a linear equation with a slope of c^2. Since speed of light is constant.

@djjdjd470

26 күн бұрын

@@ek_minute_ I thought so. As a eco hons. We have many complex expressions of slopes, both linear and curvatures. So although I know shit about E=mc², I thought it's a st line slope

@anmold5676

25 күн бұрын

No. He derived quadratic from e=mc²

his "alright, i guess it does" was the cherry on top !!!!!

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Thank you!!!

@far_awayy

Ай бұрын

@@kylechase_films Can't wait for more !!! keep it up bud :))))

When bro discovered i^2 = -1 he went history teacher

Bro is finding antimatter. Fr 💀

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

He found something 🤷‍♂️

@SODIUM10

Ай бұрын

Anti matter just has opposite charge. Not negative mass.

@CalculusIsFun1

Ай бұрын

I think dark matter would be a more accurate term. Correct me if I’m wrong, but antimatter is simply regular matter with flipped charges (positron = positively charged electron for example). Dark matter (if it exists) would repel regular matter and simulate a negative mass.

@SODIUM10

Ай бұрын

@@CalculusIsFun1 isn't dark matter supposed to hold masses together??

@CalculusIsFun1

Ай бұрын

@@SODIUM10 I mean, it’s credited with the expansion of the universe and things staying apart as well, so I’m not sure. It’s why I said correct me if I’m wrong lol.

I love how the e=mc² came out of nowhere lolss

the editing, cinematography and video were all amazing. big ups.

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Thank you!

Chanting "√(x²) = |x|" should be part of everyone's daily routine

@ziphyperap3369

23 күн бұрын

Goddammit someone said it

@valis3363

21 күн бұрын

Looks wrong to me

@fxeditors

19 күн бұрын

I read modulus

@samobalco5744

14 күн бұрын

But it is correct

@Yashraj-ii6bm

11 күн бұрын

Come, on say with me, "ROOT X SQUARED IS EQUAL TO X MOD"

Wait until he hears about quantum physics

then there is integration 😭

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Oh no

@australiadegeneratecrocodi1906

Ай бұрын

honestly found derivative more challenging , but solving integrals is another thing tho lol

@thatonecuber9266

Ай бұрын

@@australiadegeneratecrocodi1906 Then you haven't gotten anywhere close to difficult integration lol

@Stranger_in_za_matrix

Ай бұрын

What do you guys mean by, integration

@spencertarver

Ай бұрын

@@Stranger_in_za_matrixintegration, like calculus

i thought he was gonna flip the coin and realize where the negative 2 came from

bruh he didn't really answered the question he just accepted that it is how it is even teacher didn't explain Simply negative sign is a instruction in maths to change the direction of number in number line by multiplying two negative we are just changing direction two times so if we moving behind is like multiplying by a negative number by moving two times we just come to the same direction

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

That’s the one point. You don’t gotta explain

@aayanahmad1001

Ай бұрын

​@@kylechase_filmscoz you're just so smart eh🤧

@krox477

Ай бұрын

That's how maths pedagogy works

@waltuh2.3bviews3secondsago3

28 күн бұрын

I remember someone explaining it like turning round and then turning round again and you end up in the same direction

@RootsOf7

8 күн бұрын

My teacher explained it as exponents = number of times thr number is multiplied by itself, so negative number squared becomes positive because two negative numbers multipled = positive.

Me doing a basic ass integral:

Here's the geometric proof: A square in it's most basic sense is a measure of the area enclosed with 2 equally sized sides right. So if I take a length of 2, move 2 up (positive) and then to the right (positive), I will enclose a square an area of 4 square units. Now if I do this, but the opposite way, 2 down (negative) and 2 left (negative) I will still end up with an area of 4 square units, equal to previous square. Thus x^ = 4 x = +/- 2

@Shadoxite

Ай бұрын

When I read geometric proofs I expect to see shapes

@Shadoxite

Ай бұрын

But distance is a scalar quantity, it can't be negative because it doesn't make sense and can be the same as positive from a different perspective

@kiranisucihersuwari9116

Ай бұрын

So that means +/-2 just like it can be -2 or +2 Depends on the situation?

@elywickander4666

Ай бұрын

by this logic -2*2 = positive 4

@pakaanrouzmuhsinouu

Ай бұрын

​@@elywickander4666 draw that on graph and see if any relation to 4 or not

The acting, the editing, the video quality is so good. Deserves more views for sure!!

Wait till bro find out that x^4 = 16 isn't just x=2 and x=-2 Edited bc I was tweaking when I wrote the comment

@arrheniusleibniz

Ай бұрын

It's just 2 and -2

@FuriousRazor

Ай бұрын

It’s just 2 because 4th root is a function I’m sorry

@bgadam9862

Ай бұрын

Lmao it’s just 2 because root function is always positive ☠️

@truth8526

Ай бұрын

Guys, the other two are 2i and -2i, where i=sqrt(-1). Solve it for yourself.

@HoldensBro

Ай бұрын

That's a good point but the 4th root's range is only greater than or equal to 0. I don't like it that way but that's how the function is defined.

In his defense Einstein’s equations also work with negatives. I’ll leave you to think about the world-shattering implications of that…

Bro using all his brain cells for the equation while the other guy be chillin👁👄👁

bro finally found my large source of negative energy

I remember this bothering me in class too until my friend explained it he said " look - x - = + so You dont know if both the number in the square were negative or if they were postive therefore we write both negative and positive"

1:18 A true imagination comes at this moment, when you realize there are 4 roots in equation (a) 2, -2, 2i, -2i.

Mans really went from solving for x to shattering the laws of physics 💀💀💀💀

The fact that many in fact does not really understand the concept of why negative times negative becomes positive makes this video much better. Getting more money makes you richer (Positive × Positive = Positive) Getting rid of money makes you more poor. (Negative × Positive = Negative) Getting more loans makes you more poor (Positive × Negative = Negative) Getting rid of loans makes your richer (Negative × Negative = Positive) It's like playing video of a man walking backwards in reverse. You'll see the man going forward.

Wow those visual effects were stunning! Especially the fire one.

@kylechase_films

8 күн бұрын

Thank you!

And the second you will understand this..they will introduce you to ‘iota’ All the best dude

0:45 He completely forgot that he was not wearing glasses

Bro got guts to prepare a low budget high quality spoof film !

Sometime few things don't make sense but it does when we grow up and learn more about it.

This is really good. Great production!

this is probably the most motivating and inspiring video ive ever seen. and indeed, it feels amazing to understand something fully. i always have to fully know why something is the way it is, i cant just know the answer. i have to know why!

@kylechase_films

27 күн бұрын

Thank you

That was a whole movie, very impressive!

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Thank you!

Firstly, that was freaking amazing! It really felt like a movie lol. This was done really amazingly :D Secondly, here's my shot at explaining this: The thing about the square root function, is that it is defined to ALWAYS give a positive value. It's range is from 0 to +ve infinity. There is this step we often miss when writing the answer for the square root function, Which is, √ (x^2) = |x| Now we know the conditions of the mod function are - |x| = +x, if x >= 0, and |x| = (-x), if x This will make it so that the mod never gives a -ve value. We can thus, solve the equation x^2 = 4 like this: Taking square root on both sides, => √ (x^2) = √ 4 => |x| = |2| Now, |2| is just simply +2. But, |x| = +/-x as x is a variable and we do not know if it is positive or negative. This results in, +/-x = 2 We can shift the plus-minus to the RHS, and voila! => x = +/-2 Hope this helped if anyone was confused about this :D

@kylechase_films

10 күн бұрын

Wow, thank you for explaining!

bro just separated algebra from geometry.

The smooth editing and really Good Cinematography ❤

quadratic got me chills when i first did it just like this damn video , keep it up man great vid , this typa content is awesome!!!!

Honestly tho, amazing stuff here. The shots are so well done!

@kylechase_films

10 күн бұрын

Thank you!

thank you bro, i really needed this. this made my day

Broooooo this production is so cooooooool

yooo the quality of the video editing is sooo good like damnnn

Jonathan's voice is pure mathematics.

explanation: when we say √4 We mean the Definite value of the root assuming that the root is always positive. hence √9 = 3 , √16 = 4 and so on when we say x² = 4 we mistake it as x = √4 = 2. Actually this becomes a _Quadratic Equation P(x) = ax² -bx +c = 4_ where b = c = 0. therefore for x² = 4 there are *2* Real roots, One being 2 (2 X 2 = 4) And other: -2 [ -2 X -2 = -1 X -1 X 2 X 2 (taking the negative multipliers (-1) out ) = 1 X 2 X 2 ( since -1 X -1 = 1) = 4 ] hence we denote a (+/-) sign for x² = 4 then x = (+/-) 2. ~Basically~ to indicate that _Numerical Value_ of the root *might be same* but its _Integral Values_ *are different and they are the two zero's of the quadratic equation.*

First time hearing square root being called "radical"

I had this doubt in my mind for years but the last minutes made me fell in love with mathematics,Iam Cleared! It's awesome bro

@fabihaafia4665

18 күн бұрын

Emm...mind if I ask what and how did it clear your doubt? Cause all I got from the last part is that "it is what it is"😭

Bro pls pls pls make more of these am actually motivated😊❤

@kylechase_films

24 күн бұрын

I got an idea in mind

he should have just used cartesian plane to plot -2 and 2 and he would be enlightened, great video btw

Great Vid man the song is really created for such situations and ... WAIT no nevermind i thought i got a briliant dollar idea anyways congrats

i love the color grading. nice touch

Let’s do it algebraically, x^2=4 x^2-4=0 x^2-2^2=0 Using a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b), we get (x+2)(x-2)=0 For the LHS to be zero, either x+2 can be zero or x-2 can be zero. This is because if one of the two is zero, the whole product would be zero as well. (Since 0*Anything=0) Therefore, there are two cases 1) x+2=0 or x=-2 2) x-2=0 or x=+2 Thus, x can be both +2 or -2, ie. x is plus or minus 2. Q.E.D.

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

Looks about right

@arrheniusleibniz

Ай бұрын

But there's "principal square number"

@crix_h3eadshotgg992

Ай бұрын

@@arrheniusleibnizI don’t see no square in the proof my guy

@arrheniusleibniz

Ай бұрын

@@crix_h3eadshotgg992 it's the name.

@crix_h3eadshotgg992

Ай бұрын

@@arrheniusleibniz oh you meant “principal square root”?

Fr ( I'm Engineering Students Calculus and Physics Cook me 💀💀)

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

That’s going to be the end of me

There is an explanation for the negative two if you think about it, though it is not practically applicable everywhere. Suppose you are walking in a 2d plane, where you can either go forwards and backwards. Here, let's take moving forwards is positive and backwards is negative (this is by convention, however you can vice versa the entire thing if you want to take the opposite of the convention and still get your answer). Now, let's assume that for every step taken by a person in one direction, he is pushed in the same direction by the same force he uses to move in that direction. Now, he walks 2 steps forward, and boom, he is now +4 steps ahead. However, if he takes 2 steps backward, he needs to be turned around and pushed with the same force in the opposite direction as 2 steps backward refers to -2, so you get -2*2 which still equals +4 steps forward. Wait no I am confused myself.

I was lkke "What the fuck is a radical" and then they showed a root and I went "ohhh 🤦‍♂️"

Negative Numbers dont exist yes, but they do allow the difference between positive numbers. Imagination is Important ya know

squaring is multipling a number by itself so 2 * 2 = 4 and if you multiply two negative numbers it leaves a positive number so -2 * -2 = 4 but if its just one negative it will be a negative -4 -2 * 2 = -4 so two positive or negative 2's would work but not one positive and one negative two.

Ngl dude thats awesome man and i really really love that(even as a joke) curiosity

@kylechase_films

24 күн бұрын

Thank you!!

Great editing and cinematography 🆒

Great work!

Nice editing and story.

If we put positive negative sign after square or square root it's simply come positive not negative because (+)×(+)=(+) or (-)×(-)=(+).

@name_adi

6 күн бұрын

But why?

HOW IS THIS SO PERFECT?

The hand gestures and the face expression was perfecttt

@kylechase_films

24 күн бұрын

Thank you

Missed the "It's paradoxical - and yet, it works" in the end 😆

@kylechase_films

12 күн бұрын

Should’ve added that

no no wait he got a point there it can explain the dark matter and dark energy that light speed also equal to dark energy / dark matter

@kylechase_films

7 күн бұрын

Can you explain this? I don’t think I found anything

hey , I don't know how you hyped up the idea of basic radicals so much here and how that went to E=mc^2 , but dude , the cinematography was fantastic! This song was just made for edits like this. Aside from the cinematic aspect of this video, well pretty much anything can spark curiosity within our minds and I feel this song (and video) is just the very representation of it. Amazing work, man.

what a great video man, continue like that

@kylechase_films

14 күн бұрын

Will do!

radical function only gives positive values, so root(4)= +2, the eqn form has two solns becoz x can be anything

making mass negative was actually a genius move. what is negative mass, is it existing mathematically? well mass is not a vector quantity if you wanna explore Newtonian physics but in new lines, you can argue anti mass is with anti gravity.

you'll definitely enjoy differential equations and area under curve. That part of integral calculus really demands high thinking and it's quite interesting as well

this is actually so excellent

Ngl this parody actually allowed me to make sense why a square root has two answers.

After so much thinking too, at end he said I guess😂

Loved it. And let bro cook dont know what he will discover when he is unleased.

Lol literal how I feel in general chemistry 2 and calculus 1 all semester

This deserves a million views at least.

Can't imagine what this guy would be like when he learns about asymptotes

@kylechase_films

15 күн бұрын

Nah already learned about that

2^2 = 2 * 2 = 4 -2^2 = -2 * -2 = 4 2 * 2 just doubles 2 so it's 4 -2 * -2 doubles -2 so it's -4, and inverts it so it's 4 so you could write it as 2 * -1 * 2 * -1 = -2 * 2 * -1 = -4 * -1 = 4

Good job buddy… made me smile

Bro surpassed my current course of physics topic in a 3 min video 💀💀💀

2:16 "Where's -2" ..."E=MC²"

If x^2=4 then x = +2 or x=-2 , but if we consider √ 4 then √ 4=2 .This is because the sign (√ ) is defined to be the prinicipal square root ( the positive one is considered the principal square root) To summarise when solving, x^2 = a^2 (a here can be any number) x= +-√ 4 (this is where you get the two answers)

This makes me wanna discover something about math

Good attempt brother ❤

The square root of four is not plus or minus 2, but just plus two. That's why the quadratic formula has to specifically mention plus or minus the square root of the discriminant and it's why if you graph the square root of x you'll only have positive y values

@kylechase_films

Ай бұрын

That’s part of his confusion. He doesn’t know when to put plus or minus

@matheuscabral9618

Ай бұрын

I still find it weird, why did they define it that way?

Matter, as we know from the ToGR, is dependent on its motion in space. But what is interesting is that even the rest mass can be dependent on motion along more dimensions than currently considered. Idk what he told me exactly, I didn't understand, but he generalized mass in 5D and n-D space. I'll have to ask him again.

When we square a negative number it always gives a positive result...such as -2^2 = 4 while 2^2=4 too so when we introduce underoot or squareroot ourselves we put a negative sighn, since there is a possibility of the result being negative and postive

It is different because sqrt(4) is like plugging 4 into the sqrt function which is always positive since negative inputs are not "real". On the other hand, x^2=4 is about a y value for a parabola and since x squared is an even function, it has the y value of 2 for an input of positive and negative 2.

Johnathan casually adjusting his invisible glasses at 0:46 like any badass anime character

@kylechase_films

22 күн бұрын

Imma tell him this lol

This is brilliant 😂👏🏽

bro still is not sure "i guess it does "

Wait until he get to power of 0 multiplication...

Bro broke the system

√x² = |x| ≥ 0 for all real values x (therefore absolute value is always a nonnegative real number) Thus, √4 = 2, no negative A non-constant polynomial p(x) with degree n (the highest power in the expression) has exactly n solutions. This means that x² = 4 has two solutions. It as a polynomial of degree 2, soo it will have 2 solutions thus it can be factored as (x-2)(x+2) = 0 which in this example can be ±2 A polynomial (constant or non-constant) has strictly whole number exponents (n ≥ 0), so √x is not a polynomial because it has a degree of ½, thus it is not a polynomial, but more of a function. Its functionality is that of absolute value, as that is how it is defined, so f(x) = √x can never output a negative for all complex numbers (Real and non-real numbers). The main difference here is the introductory statement. - If the question is x² = 9 where we solve for x, this will have 2 solutions. - If it was “find √9” then its one answer, positive 3 ONLY. - If it was √x = -3, then there is no solution at all, real or complex. - If it was √x = 3, then there would only be one REAL solution within that set of complex solutions.

nah but jokes aside this is beautifully done

Keep it up, bro nice one ...

My brain literally blew when he shifts into physics out of the sudden ☠☠☠

Trust me , this would hit a million views in someone !

me when I finally understand residue theorem in complex analysis