They should make deep water torps work against submarines at certain depths

@FormulaZR

Жыл бұрын

Yes. But WeeGee probably doesn't know how to code that.

@ripLunarBirdCLH

Жыл бұрын

@@FormulaZR They know. But this would mean kids buying submarines and feeling very skilled because of it would no longer feel skilled. And this would result in less money from said kids for Wargaming.

@CORV3TT33

Жыл бұрын

What do you mean? DW torps can hit subs? they aren't much better than regular torps, but slightly lower in the water helps.

@ripLunarBirdCLH

Жыл бұрын

@@CORV3TT33 They are low enough to hit a sub on periscope depth. Subs on periscope depth can still ram DDs IRL after all.

@baohoang4966

11 ай бұрын

No, that would be stupid since Deep torps swim at about 10-15m depth, Subs when they dive is 30m underwater ! How the fck could it hit them ?

As a Taiwanese (native Chinese speaker), the kunming is 昆明, a city in China. In terms of pronounciation, it sounds more like “quen Ming “

@mrz9093

Жыл бұрын

yes its in Mainland China, a very nice place

@gothia1715

Жыл бұрын

@@mrz9093 +10.000 Social Credit.

@darthteej1

Жыл бұрын

thank you for the info!!

@waleedmukhtar2925

Жыл бұрын

mainland china is indeed amazing place if you like concentration camps

@AmishHitman73.Archive

Жыл бұрын

as a person who smokes pot, i agree thats how id say it

Definitely an interesting concept, trades a lot of concealment and gunpower for a stupid amount of torps. Looks like it's gonna be quite weak against destroyers (thanks to conceal, bad guns and torpedo spotting), but old Shimakaze wall of skill levels of stupid if left unattended.

@burt591

Жыл бұрын

It's basically a double Shimakaze with invisible torps, it's insane

Ah yes the Kunming 🤤

This game a pretty good example of the issues the PA DDs and CLs face: you can rack up a lot of damage kiting a weak flank, but very difficult to make a positive game impact.

I've been taking a break from the game for about a year. Just before super ships were introduced. Played my first game last night after wanting to play after binging your videos. Looking forward to playing these super ships :)

I love YY and this one will be one of my top DDs. Nice video Thanks!

Now I know why WG is not releasing Kitakami any time soon

@issacfoster1113

Жыл бұрын

Theyre not releasing that ship.

@MegaGhandor

Жыл бұрын

@@issacfoster1113 Like Submarines ?

@neilbhalodi8797

Жыл бұрын

@@issacfoster1113 like guns bigger than 460 mm?

@forge16hanadamaintenancedr43

Жыл бұрын

@@issacfoster1113 I think the reasoning back then was that it did too much friendly damage, but now with that concern gone it is a possible choice on the table. But they also hate IJN in general so idk

@SpenzOT

Жыл бұрын

@@forge16hanadamaintenancedr43 The Kitakami wasn't as good as people think it was. I remember fighting that ship in beta and it could not stealth torp, it was really squishy, and it was CV food. It could dump a lot of torps, but they had terrible range for japanese torpedoes, and it would not thrive in the meta today. I always believed that they never released it simply because it was a gimmick ship before gimmick ships existed, and it did not perform well enough to justify selling it (back when they actually still cared about that).

That boat with a Gearing would be a mighty combo together.

I feel like Yueyang can do the same things as this without sacrificing half a km of concealment. The additional torp rack is nice but I feel a ship that relies heavily on it’s torps can’t afford to lose that stealth. EDIT: (Not running legendary mod cause that would be stupid to run along with a torp build)

@kirkdouglas8827

Жыл бұрын

Legendary YY is 6.5 detection .:)

@reggiewallace6453

Жыл бұрын

@@kirkdouglas8827 torp build YY is 5.8 detect

@kirkdouglas8827

Жыл бұрын

@@reggiewallace6453 Legendary torp build YY is 6.5 detect. How do you not know this.

@general_alexus2533

Жыл бұрын

@@kirkdouglas8827 Legendary YY has 7.5km 40 sek Radar

@kirkdouglas8827

Жыл бұрын

@@general_alexus2533 Yes, but we are talking about detection :) Which is... drumroll... 6.5

So many ships designed specifically designed to punish any aggressive BB play... CVs, SSs. Sometimes I feel like the game is incentivizing me to play passive long range sniper or not play BB at all...

First time I ever heard him was narrating over a Sandy Ravage call of duty video. Buddies used to show me clips at work to get me into the game and I remember this particular video blew up and nobody knew the voice in the background talking over Sandy's gameplay. It's epic and it is still on You tube

@11:00 your back turets salvo squeezed in between rocks and trees probably some insects too, God knows how, finaly landing on Yamagiri for the kill. I mean...come on dude!

As someone who really enjoys YY I am excited for this ship. Think I have a great PR in YY right now witch is surprising giving todays meta.

thanks for not posting preview videos without gameplay!

Nice content, On the reticule I have 4 values. One of them (lower right) is showing current detection range. Not even sure how to disable that.

That was an evil laugh at 6:10

this ship contradicts itself. add a turret for 8 guns = awesome gunboat. make the reload slow and have floaty shells = poor gunboat give it 15 deep water torps with rlb = awesome torpboat. make the concealment relatively poor = poor torpboat. What are you??? super confused ship

One of the Supers im looking forward to the most. Will definitaly go for Superintendent for that extra TRB and 30 torp salvo rather then investing in BFT for a small buff to mediocre guns.

I like this boat, but wish the torps were homing, could curve around islands, always auto targeted CVs and subs, and had a 5 second reload. Oh and you dont have to see the sub or CV.

We already have torpedo salad in randoms, 2x more torps in the water compared to few years ago. Now I am looking forward to minefields with 50k alpha dmg per hit.

@skarhabekgreyrukh8601

Жыл бұрын

yeah.... because player giving this kind of idea WG create more stupid things.... STOP GIVING WG IDEAS!!!

What chat mods are you using? I like that it associates the ship with the commentor

Shell arcs look nice too

I can only imagine the meems that will arise from this thing deleting a flank...

HEY WARGAMING! I want my damn KitaKami back!!!!!!!!!!! Now that you have put these DD's with damn near as many Torp's on a couple of other DD in the game now a days!

It is more like a souped-up Somers than anything else.

more torps please im bad now and need more fish to do damage LUL

Almost Somers with a TRB

Tier 11.5. Y’all Starship pilots have a good time. . .

thank you.

While superships might be fun for some, maybe WG should keep them in their own mode. It’s really hard when there is 4 or 5 superships on each side and then you get a CV and or sub in the mix. I’m not playing subs or superships. Love playing DD’s so I am working on getting a Vampire II. But that is kinda like a supership, or a different type of DARING.

kunming/anapolis with a spotter? Kearsarge?

How do you get these special captains?

Wayminut I didn’t have to buy this for silver credits? Research Bureau was an option??

100k in a bit more than 5 minutes... You almost completed the "Slava challenge" in a DD ;)

Which mod do you use in the bottom left, where you can see the angle of your ship vs the angle of the enemy ship?

@benco1163

Жыл бұрын

Should be the Navigator mod. You can place it in center view and a little to the right of center also. Should be available both in Modstation and Aslains.

@marthijnz.

Жыл бұрын

@@benco1163 Thnx for the reply! Must be aslain because I can't find it in Modstation, this exact oine I mean. I have Battle Expert, but it looks very different and can't be moved around. Aslain is safe to use also I guess?

@benco1163

Жыл бұрын

@@marthijnz. Yes, Aslain has been around for a long time and does an excellent job keeping the mods up-to-date or removing them if they're not so that you can still continue to use the modpack.

Im like the unluckiest person with torps. Everyone else gets BB's turning out broadside while I get Yamatos that can stop on a dime or pull hard 90° turns right before my gearing torps hit.

I also have a code for this game with the classic Charleston and it has other in game stuff that I don't know what thar stuff is

Pan-Asian deepwater torpedoes should, IMO, hit submerged U-boats and MAYBE even Supership/Tier 11/* Tier destroyers. Asashio's torpedos should maybe stick to BBs and CVs, but also hit max depth subs. USS *Iowa* had a draft of 37 ft, USS *Balao* had a draft of 16 ft when running on the surface. So any torpedo that is within 8 ft of a submerged USS *Balao*'s depth would make contact with it. I don't think there's a depth mechanic for deepwater torpedoes to check the draft of the ship, I think they're just hard-coded to only detonate when contacting ships of the classes they're "allowed" to hit. But if a DW torpedo from *Yueyang* can hit an *Iowa*-class, then they are apparently running about 35 ft deep. If a *Cachalot* is between 27 ft and 42 ft deep, then the *Yueyang* torpedo would make contact with the ship.

Yes more torps Not like the game lacks them

@zx-3948

Жыл бұрын

And other deep sea abysal horrors that reamin unseen!

How’d you get that commander?

Great team🤣

Are you commentating live or just overdubbing a replay ?

Kitakami is real!

Need Kitakami back, Or give us a new cruiser with Halland's weak but very fast torps. :)

If you win in this ship would you be Kumming.

Ship request:neustrashimy the T9 RU DD

Imagine Kunming and Dalarna together in one flank... They dont need a team.

Only just realized; do deep water torpedoes hit submarines at any of their depths?

@joshuastewart3216

Жыл бұрын

They do not sadly

@fastbyte4583

Жыл бұрын

@@joshuastewart3216 They can if transitioning from 30m to periscope

PQ didn't play WoWS in the beginning. There was a Japanese torp monster - I forgot its name (Kitakami?) - which might have been the first ship pulled after go-live. They removed it in the first year IIRC. So 7+ years later we've come full circle. Now WoWS sees power creep as a money maker, an assumption likely made in desperation. If only WoWS would realize that the surest path to player growth is fixing all extant issues. An industry leader would go this way and then monetize a solid platform.

@dclark142002

Жыл бұрын

FYI - power creep has ALWAYS been part of WGs monetization strategy. It's just getting more transparent.

gib me my kitakami weegee

RIP: Shima T.T

imagine 3 player div with kunming and they decide to decide a flank as no CA/BB zone

omg im kunming

This is going to be my first Super ship. My first TX was Yueyang so it just seems fitting.

Honestly, that display is why I think super ships are ruining the game. The Humphreys, this new one you just played, even the other super DD's are just too OP to be in randoms with the normal ships in general. I love the torpedo reload booster on my YY, But I would gladly give it up to get rid of every super ship and subs.

I was the unlucky vincent :/ 🤣

I've got 800 games in Benham, and even I think that's too many torps 😀

It’s pronunciation is ku-an ming

it be terrifying if it wasnt deep-water

one of dem "this team" scenarios..

400+k service cost, quite expensive... 🙃

Thats way too much, I dont know what this guys at WG are thinking

Damn and I thought Yamagiri was bad… Doesn’t matter if they’re deep waters or not if you nuke whatever you hit

She does have the best name atleast

at least its deep water, dd players are slightly happy

So, Pan Asian supership BB and CA when?

Super Shima is literally going to shit impassable walls of skill.

I’m Kunming

Once diable 4 comes out, I'm putting my account for sale. Done with this game. If anyone is interested, hit me up for details.

All Shima mains are going be chewing at the bit to get into this boat. Another reason for BBs to sit at the back

@chrisexit8467

Жыл бұрын

if they wanna lose the games they can

yoooooooooooooooo

That name though is very sus.

PQ went on to have a even better game then this on stream!

So a crazy amount of "fish" get dropped in the water... isn't that ship name a little on the nose..... Oh WG, well played.

These 'super' ships appear to evidence a slightly tighter, faster turning circle around the drain for this game.

i have to say its really getting bonkers with those superships. SO much power and you can face T9s. Its kinda unfair having full divisons of them just pounding youre face in with any means to stop that. It like i am a NPC just there to get his ass kicked in. shouldnt be allowed. Same for having 5 on each side. its wild and a waste of time to play such a lobby - no fun allowed.

This is not a typical ship build you put together. You put a special 21 point commander on the ship. I am sure the ship is broken enough without it. Looks like WG can't wait to kill this game with all the rapid fire gimics it keeps pushing out...

You had two fires this game and both of them claimed a kill for you, wth lmao.

hi

Even PQ and a super dd cannot carry a bunch of potatoes.

"Good with torps" so bad for me :(

As a BB main im certainly not thrilled.

i think koon ming is slightly more accurate or at least as accurate english prounciation get to the Chinese one edit: if by chance you know the Japanese suffix name-kun it sound similar too

this ship name is sus af

først :D

Kunnimingus

That's not "too many torpedoes", that's "just right by WG's logic".

as a BB player, i realy need to say, this ship is everything but´not balanced

Goodluck if u don't have hydro around and fight this DD 🤣

69 likes, sorry bud, I can’t be the one to take it off that number. 👍🏽

Superships are another reason why I quit playing the game. I'm not grinding credits or purchasing them in order to play these ships. And I have no interest in playing my T-Xs against them just to be their cannon fodder. Thanks but no thanks.

Before I started playing I thought a "torpedo spammer" was someone posting lots of child porn on The Onion Ring. Now I know what it really means but I still think I was right.

Like there isnt enough cancer in this game already.

Your team should feel ashamed of themselves for those low scores lol.

Yo I have a gift code for this game that has 1mil credits and a tier 3 cruiser st Louis can anyone tell me how much this is worth irl as in hpw much would someone pay for this

where are you playing these games on ? The game the last few days have been a joke no dds spotting every BB in the back matchmaking lopsisded seems the games you play i know your good i enjoy your videos .

@RonnieRampants

Жыл бұрын

He plays on america servers.

@slip6699

Жыл бұрын

NA has really good players and a LOT of really bad ones. A lot of the time the games come down to who's potatoes survive longer.

I swear most videos you’ve uploaded lately have been defeats… :(

Cool push the cruisers an BBs back even further, then wonder why the the game is a pathetic back row camp out. Wows is acually trying to kill this game FFS!

Because thats what this shitty game needed. more fkn super ships. no thanks. watching these videos helps me remember why i ve quit months ago

@yumadgaminglord1002

Жыл бұрын

cope

@danh7411

Жыл бұрын

>Supership that's worse than the tier 10

@razvananghel7492

Жыл бұрын

@@yumadgaminglord1002 why you mad bro? closed beta player here, enjoy that shitty russian game that nobody else really ever does anymore while you can. nobody cares, it is an absolute shit game and everyone in the gaming community treats it as such

@lrock48

Жыл бұрын

It's all gimmicks to get people to spend money

@eiresby2344

Жыл бұрын

Superships not a problem, they are similar with how T7 vs T9 if you are T9. However tier 9 vs 11 not mean end of the world, I could still wreck them or at least playing with them even against super CV. Playing against T11 is like playing with their T10 with little bit of tweaks. how to say, for example against satsuma with BBs which I have mindset "oh, shikishima with additional turret and f key so the distance to kite is similar with shiki and yama" or with yamagiri which I have mindset that she is shimakaze. Superships not that scary tho if you experience as bottom tiered