Summa Contra Gentiles, Second Book (On Creation) by Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274)
Genre(s): Christianity - Commentary, Christianity - Other
Read by: M.S.C. Lambert, LC in English
Cover design by Annise.
Parts:
Part 1 • Summa Contra Gentiles,...
Chapters:
00:00:00 - 61 - LXI. THAT THE AFORESAID OPINION IS CONTRARY TO THAT OF ARISTOTLE
00:04:23 - 62 - LXII. AGAINST THE OPINION OF ALEXANDER ABOUT THE POSSIBLE INTELLECT
00:14:14 - 63 - LXIII. THAT THE SOUL IS NOT TEMPERAMENT, AS GALEN ASSERTED
00:17:49 - 64 - LXIV. THAT THE SOUL IS NOT HARMONY
00:20:37 - 65 - LXV. THAT THE SOUL IS NOT BODY
00:25:14 - 66 - LXVI. AGAINST THOSE WHO SAY THAT INTELLECT AND SENSE ARE THE SAME
00:28:24 - 67 - LXVII. AGAINST THOSE WHO SAY THAT THE POSSIBLE INTELLECT IS THE IMAGINATION
00:31:05 - 68 - LXVIII. HOW AN INTELLECTUAL SUBSTANCE CAN BE THE FORM OF THE BODY
00:39:52 - 69 - LXIX. SOLUTION OF THE ARGUMENTS BY WHICH IT WAS PROVED ABOVE THAT AN INTELLECTUAL SLBSTANCE CANNOT BE UNITED TO THE BODY AS ITS FORM
00:46:26 - 70 - LXX. THAT ACCORDING TO THE WORDS OF ARISTOTLE WE JUST SAY THAT THE INTELLECT IS UNITED TO THE BODY AS ITS FORM
00:51:46 - 71 - LXXI. THAT THE SOUL IS UNITED TO THE BODY IMMEDIATELY
00:54:22 - 72 - LXXII. THAT THE WHOLE SOUL IS IN THE WHOLE BODY AND IN EACH PART THEREOF
01:00:02 - 73 - LXXIII. THAT THERE IS NOT ONE POSSIBLE INTELLECT IN ALL MEN
01:30:22 - 74 - LXXIV. OF THE OPINION OF AVICENNA, WHO ASSERTED THAT INTELLIGIBLE FORMS ARE NOT PRESERVED IN THE POSSIBLE INTELLECT
01:42:18 - 75 - LXXV. SOLUTION OF THE ARGUMENTS WHICH WOULD SEEM TO PROVE THE UNITY OF THE POSSIBLE INTELLECT
02:01:07 - 76 - LXXVI. THAT THE ACTIVE INTELLECT IS NOT SEPARATE SUBSTANCE BUT PART OF THE SOUL
02:18:25 - 77 - LXXVII. THAT IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE POSSIBLE AND ACTIVE INTELLECT TO CONCUR IN THE ONE SUBSTANCE OF THE SOUL
02:26:19 - 78 - LXXVIII. THAT ARISTOTLE'S OPINION CONCERNING THE ACTIVE INTELLECT WAS NOT THAT IT IS SEPARATE SUBSTANCE, BUT RATHER THAT IT IS PART OF THE SOUL
02:40:20 - 79 - LXXIX. THAT THE HUMAN SOUL IS NOT CORRUPTED WHEN THE BODY IS CORRUPTED
02:52:14 - 80 - LXXX. ARGUMENTS TO PROVE THAT THE SOUL IS CORRUPTED WHEN THE BODY IS CORRUPTED
02:59:03 - 81 - LXXXI. ARGUMENTS TO PROVE THAT THE SOUL IS CORRUPTED WHEN THE BODY IS CORRUPTED
03:12:14 - 82 - LXXXII. THAT THE SOULS OF DUMB ANIMALS ARE NOT IMMORTAL
03:26:49 - 83 - LXXXIII. THAT THE HUMAN SOUL BEGINS TO EXIST WITH THE BODY
03:58:17 - 84 - LXXXIV. SOLUTION OF THE FOREGOING ARGUMENTS
04:04:23 - 85 - LXXXV. THAT THE SOUL IS NOT MADE OF GOD'S SUBSTANCE
04:11:47 - 86 - LXXXVI. THAT THE HUMAN SOUL IS NOT TRANSMITTED WITH THE SEMEN
04:19:37 - 87 - LXXXVII. THAT THE HUMAN SOUL IS BROUGHT INTO BEING THROUGH CREATION BY GOD
04:25:27 - 88 - LXXXVIII. ARGUMENTS FOR PROVING THAT THE HUMAN SOUL IS FORMED FROM THE SEMEN
04:34:44 - 89 - LXXXIX. SOLUTION OF THE FOREGOING ARGUMENTS
04:58:28 - 90 - XC. THAT AN INTELLECTUAL SUBSTANCE IS UNITED AS FORM TO NO OTHER THAN THE HUMAN BODY
05:09:20 - 91 - XCI. THAT THERE ARE SOME INTELLECTUAL SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE NOT UNITED TO BODIES
05:19:22 - 92 - XCII. OF THE GREAT NUMBER OF SEPARATE SUBSTANCES
05:31:04 - 93 - XCIII. THAT THERE ARE NOT SEVERAL SEPARATE SUBSTANCES OF ONE SPECIES
05:34:50 - 94 - XCIV. THAT THE SEPARATE SUBSTANCE AND THE SOUL ARE NOT OF ONE SPECIES
05:37:52 - 95 - XCV. HOW WE ARE TO UNDERSTAND GENUS AND SPECIES IN SEPARATE SUBSTANCES
05:44:10 - 96 - XCVI. THAT SEPARATE SUBSTANCES DO NOT GATHER THEIR KNOWLEDGE FROM SENSIBLES
05:52:47 - 97 - XCVII. THAT THE INTELLECT OF SEPARATE SUBSTANCE ALWAYS UNDERSTANDS ACTUALLY
05:55:43 - 98 - XCVIII. HOW ONE SEPARATE SUBSTANCE UNDERSTANDS ANOTHER
06:14:21 - 99 - XCIX. THAT SEPARATE SUBSTANCES KNOW MATERIAL THINGS
06:18:50 - 100 - C. THAT SEPARATE SUBSTANCES KNOW SINGULARS
06:24:19 - 101 - CI. WHETHER SEPARATE SUBSTANCES KNOW ALL THINGS AT THE SAME TIME BY THEIR NATURAL KNOWLEDGE
The Summa Contra Gentiles was composed by Thomas Aquinas between 1259 and 1265, in four books broadly covering teachings on God, on Creation, on Providence, and on tenets specific to Christianity. This Summa is not to be confused with his final Summa, the Summa Theologiae. The latter is specifically 'theological' and directed to a Christian audience , whereas the former, as the 'Contra Gentiles' indicates, is directed toward 'non-Christian' thinkers.
More information: librivox.org/summa-contra-gen...