Play World of Warships here: wo.ws/3gXzCIO Thank you World of Warships for sponsoring this video. During registration use the code BRAVO to get some exclusive rewards.

@piconano

Жыл бұрын

I'm unsubbing from you for taking on a Russian Oligarch owned company as a sponsor.

@4411825

Жыл бұрын

@@piconano Are Russian oligarch owned companies worse than American 🇺🇸 or Israeli owned oligarchs companies???

@novosib9017

Жыл бұрын

@@piconano oh you moral warrior you. Canada will be proud.

@perkunas2147

Жыл бұрын

We, all the peoples of Europe and the peoples of America, must put pressure on our NATO alliance. We are obliged to demand assistance to fraternal Ukraine, which is drowning in blood in the name of freedom.🥲🥲🥲

@exa0710

Жыл бұрын

YOO THE GAME I PLAY SPONSORED THIS STUFF!

A lotta people would be more and better informed if there was more unbiased videos like this , just learning the best engineering from both sides

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for understanding the core of what this channel is - All for the Engineering Story behind it.

@Rusich945

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly The su-57 is equipped with 6 radars, each compartment has 3 k-77 missiles with a range of up to 190 km. there are 6 K-77 missiles in total, and two of THEIR short-range missiles. also, 4 r-37m missiles with a range of up to 400 km (against AWACS) can be installed in two large compartments the "bulges" behind the cockpit and under the cockpit are a multispectral laser, it blinds the IR guidance heads of missiles. also , an electronic warfare system is installed at the ends of the wings . SU57 is equipped with AI, it allows you to land and fly without a pilot, and fight without a pilot

@prokremelskidezolati1426

Жыл бұрын

@@Rusich945 range 190km? loooooooooooooooooooool

@prokremelskidezolati1426

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinmai4326 yep, the russian propagandist from Italy :)))

@lwramanthegreat

Жыл бұрын

@@prokremelskidezolati1426 like the f35 crashing every time it goes flying and gets promoted to submarines lol

You forgot to mention that the Su57 has 2 types of radar, on the nose for the X-band radar, on the wing for the L-band radar. l band radar is very effective for detecting stealth aircraft.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

We were not sure of it thats's why

@spinningsquare1325

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly its pretty much official, there is even a picture that shows where they are I think

@srcastic8764

Жыл бұрын

I band may detect them, but it can’t target them because it’s resolution is far too low. All it can do is tell you there’s a stealth jet in that general area. In truth, stealth like the F-22 and F-35 aren’t all that worried about being detected. They don’t get too upset that you know they’re around. They just don’t want to be targeted and I-band can’t do that. It’s also sort of useless to be on the jet itself because low band radar arrays on the ground can do the same thing and most countries have that already. The SU57’s stealth is so poor it has already been detected, targeted and killed before that matters anyway.

@srcastic8764

Жыл бұрын

@@VeniVidiMortui that’s the F-35 mission in a nutshell also. The difference is the SU57’s stealth capabilities are really inferior and the f-35’s stealth capability is incredibly good. So, in theory at least, the SU isn’t going to win at that game because it is going to be detected and targeted first and from farther away. The F-35’s are all linked together also and can fight as one unit, can see what each other are seeing at the flick of a switch even. It’s just phenomenal. There’s really no comparison.

@srcastic8764

Жыл бұрын

@@VeniVidiMortui you must have a reading comprehension problem. I didn’t say they don’t care that you know WHERE they are. I said they don’t care that you know they’re in the area. Low band can not give an exact location and cannot target. What they do care about is you knowing their exact location and being targeted. Low band radar can’t do this, SAMS can’t do it, and vectored aircraft cant locate them with their high band radar. And no, I didn’t mean the SU can detect the F35 first. The F35 is far more advanced and can detect farther out. I think you may be conflating my response to someone pointing out the low band radar pod on the SU in addition to the X band in the nose, which again low band is not accurate in locating, just detecting presence. Think of low band like a radar detector in a car. You know there’s a radar out there but you have no idea where. So the F-35 still has the advantage. I have no idea why you say the SU has a larger area of situational awareness. In truth the F35’s networking ability means each pilot can see what every other f35 out there can see at the flip of a switch and what they’re targeting means they each have an area of situational awareness limited only by how many 35’s are in the theater. Precision and unlimited range. And they can each target far more targets at once. So I don’t contradict myself, you just can’t read.

No politic, just admire the engineering. Btw, some of your explanations are not accurate. For example, that's not how cobra pughachev maneuver work, etc

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Ok we are not Sure to be honest a lot of infoformation on the internet. Thanks for your feedback.

@oscarsandoval3877

Жыл бұрын

I agree with you, even the information of radar and the manuver are not accurate

@ok-ji6ux

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly su75 checkmate review

@hasithakumarasiri8343

Жыл бұрын

Only russia has 3D thrust vectoring technology .. thats is the advantage to use such manevurs

@srcastic8764

Жыл бұрын

@@hasithakumarasiri8343 only Russia gives a shit about 3D vectoring or that maneuver as its useless except at air shows. But ok.

The wing loading is same for both F22 and Su-57. It is rated at +9/-3 Gs.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

thanks for the Input

@nervura64

Жыл бұрын

You wrote a complete nonsense. Negative loads are applicable only to the pilot, airframe, like Su-57, or F-22, no matter which way, so they are measured in one digit. In the case of the Su-57, it is 10-11g. If we talk about the load on the wing structure, then the working loads on the aircraft in flight are approximately 67% of the calculated ones, and loads of about 90% in operation cannot be in principle. In the case of the Su-57, the destruction occurs at 104% of the calculated.

man this is so cool, no politics, no hate or sarcasm. Just information and 3D images. Here in Australia they are saying the F35 is a bad investment due to its extremely overcomplicated software.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes agreed i believe the Future is Drone Warfare. Britian Italy and Japan are developing one saw it on the News.

@Ben-jr6vl

Жыл бұрын

True f35 is rubbish. I remember a retired airforce official warning the Aussie government about the purchase, stating Sukhoi jets were supervisor, and recommended the f22 as the only aircraft that could compete

@PrefoX

Жыл бұрын

what do you have to do with the software? its working already and you don't have to change anything or dev at all... the F35 is the best fighter after the F22 by far

@PrefoX

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly wow really they dev one drone... not that most industrial counties already have tons of drones developed xD

@PrefoX

Жыл бұрын

@@Ben-jr6vl SU jets are by far not superior or why is russia so fucking bad everywhere xD its just cheap bullshit with lots of propaganda like everytime with russia...

It's so refreshing to see a video talk facts and keep its biases to itself.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

@nexpro6118

Жыл бұрын

Here's some facts....IF....those radars actually were manufactured and installed in the SU57s. Lol. Russia on paper can also tech manufacture these missiles they claim to have just like their radars they claim to have. however....Russia cannot afford to build any and doesn't have the materials either. Not to mention that the reason why, India backed out of the deal with Russia on purchasing dozens of SU57s was because India found out that the SU57 was no more "stealthy" than a slick F18 Block 3. Lmao. Also, the engines that are advertised to be on the SU57, are not actually on any of em because Russia is having issues with em and cannot manufacture any of them right and can't manufacture anymore than like 2 a year. The SU57 has rivets all over em(which is horrible for stealth) lol and has gaps all over em and the MASSIVE air intakes give off a huge radar cross section. Also, the end/rear of the engines have ZERO heat absorbing material on em and gives off a MASSIVE heat track. Lmao

@user-dc9oq2pr6v

Жыл бұрын

@@nexpro6118 youtube comments experts are always better than engineers

@nexpro6118

Жыл бұрын

@@user-dc9oq2pr6v duh! Lol I mean come on. Where else can you get 1000% real and correct information on any topic than from random strangers that can right anything they make up on line lmao

@einundsiebenziger5488

10 ай бұрын

@@nexpro6118 Here are* some facts ...

All politics aside, this is a great fighter jet. The main problem is just the production capacity. It is very limited compared to Soviet Union.

@andrewpotapenkoff7723

Жыл бұрын

I'm not even sure if we (Russia) even need fleet of jets like this, because we will never outnumber NATO or US air forces. Perhaps it's more realistic to do something cheaper and in more quantity.

@novosib9017

Жыл бұрын

@@andrewpotapenkoff7723 I Believe this type of jet is used not only as a fighter, but as a command post deep and hidden somewhere in the sky over Russia or close to a enemy nation. Being able to track many targets, relay information or strike and never be seen.

@kanestalin7246

Жыл бұрын

@@andrewpotapenkoff7723 and where the ballistic missiles come into play.

@mikecimerian6913

Жыл бұрын

Russia used to go for "good enough" and built thousands. The qualitative edge is what counts now. It took Russia until 2005 to restore post WWII demographics of Russia. Quality and survivability is a better bet. Russia is two steps ahead in missiles and air defense, this is what keeps the country safe.

@kanestalin7246

Жыл бұрын

@@mikecimerian6913 i know

Russia have a very different mindset about aviation and how it suppose to perform, and especially about this fuss about stealth in general. So engineers are not fixed on idea of stealth by any cost (like you would pay for stealth by limiting thrust vectors on F-22), but rather compromising on stealth capability to have unmatched maneuverability instead. That mean, the Su-57 is about as stealth as it can be, but only if you scan it by radar from front or from side. It's RCS is just the same as it is with F-22 or F-35, no difference there. However, if you look at RCS from a rear.. In this case it's only more stealthy than any current gen 4 or gen 4+ jet, but definitely not on F-22 territory. So if you scan it front or side - it's F-22 or F-35, but if you scan it from rear where engines are, then it is a different story. This compromise resulted in a very unique and so far unmatched decision that helps to compensate for bigger RCS from rear, which is not common to what is considered to be 5 gen fighter. Which is why it's the first fighter to mount a DIRCM system, with one turret mounted behind the canopy and another mounted under the cockpit providing jet with yet another layer of protection to compensate for rear RCS. If opposing radar would detect engine signature from rear this layer of protection will give it additional edge and combined with extra maneuverability and ability to change thrust vectoring on fly, it suppose to effectively mitigate the threat because once jet is turned forward and flying backward, the missile can't lock onto it anymore and IRST and DIRCM only making it worse for missile trying to find it's signature and for radar to keep it. However, there is more to it. There was another reasoning behind it, and it's because Russia believes that stealth technology will not live for long because radars are much more ahead of their time already, and it's going to be even more effective with years with new weapons as well. Since Russia can't afford just wasting money to create a dedicated stealth jet because it is inevitably will be obsolete later, they instead created jet that can withstand time, in order so there wouldn't be any need to create new jet to compensate for it. This fighter will be effective as it is at least 2 generations. Even when stealth will no longer be effective and radar technology will nullify it's use, this fighter jet will be ready for it with DIRCM and unmatched maneuverability while others would need to create completely new designs to keep up with time. Most likely mirroring the design of Su-57 and especially DIRCM capability. Essentially it's one jet for 2 generations ahead without any need to waste more money on new one later. Ingenious decision. Peak engineering. I am a big fan of this beauty.

@apolloaero

Жыл бұрын

What makes you think Su-57 frontal RCS is even near F-35's or F-22's? Even their own patents claim an RCS 1,000 times bigger than F-35 and F-22. IRST is a sphere, one of the worst possible shapes for stealth. It uses radar blockers to cover the exposed engine since it only has partial s-duct. The Super Hornet uses radar blockers, will you claim it's as effective at hiding its engine signature as true stealth? And then you have RAM that's sparingly used for the Su-57, only for leading edges and radar dome basically. All moving vertical stabilizers and levcons are also bad. That's why F-22 has a fixed inlet and F-35 uses divertless bumps. Another thing you've failed to realize is that the exact same technology that benefits radars benefits jammers. Jamming power required is directly proportional to the RCS of the aircraft you're trying to cover. This means that if have an aircraft with a 1m2 RCS and it needs 5 kW of jamming power to reduce burn-through range to 150 km, an aircraft with an RCS of 0.01 would only need 50 Watts of power from the jammer to achieve the same burn-through. Burn-through is the range at which the radar return signal from the radar is more powerful than the jammer's signal and thus can see through the jamming. Here's the interesting thing though, an aircraft with 1% of the RCS will have it's burn-through detection range reduced ten-fold if you use the same jamming power. So if the burn-through for 1m2 aircraft is 600 km, it'd be 60 km against an aircraft with an RCS of 0.01m2. Also, Su-57 MAWS is comprised of the 101KS-U, which is UV-based. It only detects a SAM or AAM while the rocket is burning. Modern missiles and rockets try to reduce their UV signature by using special propellants to make the smoke less detectable in that spectrum, but that's besides the point. Su-57 has a claimed detection range of 30 km against SAMs and 20 km against AAMs. That means an AIM-120D will easily go unnoticed and the Su-57 will be completely unaware until the AMRAAM goes pitbull. Nothing a DIRCM can do against a radar guided missile. The nail in the coffin is that not only is the F-35 stealthier, but it has a more powerful radar. The AN/APG-81 has a larger TRM count vs the Byelka N036 (1626 vs 1552) as well as being of the Notch design which is better than Slot design because of greater bandwidth and radar gain. This isn't like the movies or Ace Combat, dodging missiles is no easy feat. Especially if you only get 10 secs of warning time max. And especially if you need to dodge another one immediately after.

@MrZlocktar

Жыл бұрын

@@apolloaero It was rather hard to read. Next time please divide your sentences in column. As for the topic: "The F-22 (American fighter of the fifth generation - IF-AVN) has 0.3-0.4 sq.m. We have similar visibility requirements," Davidenko said." To add more new information about changes to the serial model of a jet which is now in service: RAM is now present everywhere even in the inlets. The ducts are now curved, using a new design on shape with RAM and radar blockers. Serrated nozzles. I see your point, and i think i am exaggerated it's stealth capability as it might not be exactly similar to F-22 or F-35, but just good enough to perform in combat conditions it was built for. It should be clear and i said it previously, that Russia have a very different mindset about 5th gen fighters and aviation in general. As i said, they can't afford to just built dedicated fighter for it to inevitably became obsolete in near future. Because it will became obsolete. And essentially that's just wasted money. So instead they designed something more close to fighters that will be in use after stealth will became obsolete. They are planning ahead so to speak. Truth is, in real modern war - planes don't fly up in sky. So this stealth capability worth shit regardless. And they are aware of this fact. Which is why DIRCM was incorporated in the design along with many other unique ideas. I am not mentioning armaments, because that's a whole different topic. They are not building plane to harass some middle east countries without AA defense or fighter jets you know.. Or how about the very fact they are using the one and only coaxial assault helicopter in the world. And US only now trying to adapt same technology to create their own version. That should tell you something about different mindset on the matter of aviation in general. It's not just about planes, it's about everything.

@apolloaero

Жыл бұрын

@MrZlocktar so you're taking another organization's word over the manufacturer's regarding RCS? I had no idea they had their own F-22s and F-35s to test. How convenient that our stealth fighters are 3-4 times less stealthy than the Su-57 according to their claims. And no, just look at any Su-57 from serial production. They don't make extensive use of RAM. You can tell by the colorful paint schemes they chose to adopt. Or is russia so advanced that they're the only ones in the whole entire world that can make colorful RAM? As I've said, leading edge RAM treatment, treatment on IRST when turned back and not in use, obviously inlets and in the duct itself. But most of it has no treatment. Did you completely disregard my comments on radars and jammers? Let me ask you something, why is it that russian soldiers don't use red combat uniforms? With all of the advancement in thermals, NVGs and such, there's no point in camo, amirite? Stealth is about delaying detection. And as I've said, jamming is more effective when the aircraft you're supporting has a smaller RCS. DIRCM doesn't work against radar guided missiles. What good is it if the Su-57 will be caught completely unaware thanks to the antiquated UV-based MAWS it employs. AIM-120D has a NEZ of 45 km and max range of 160 km, these rockets only fire for 10 seconds. The 101KS-U won't see it, and the RWR won't go off until the AIM-120D goes pitbull. A modern missile can pull 30G, more than the 9G or 10 or 11G Su-57 claims. You can't notch, nor climb down to thicker air to rob the missile of its energy if you don't know you've been fired upon. You claim the Su-57 is future-proof. But how is that the case when it's already obsolete against the threat it was made to defeat today? It's no Raptor nor Lightning 2 killer. And it's not like it could be used to hunt AWACS. They'll get detected at over 200 km and AWACS would simply coordinate the nearest fighter to intercept before the missiles Su-57 launches can go terminal. That's if it doesn't get detected by the F-35 or F-22 1st. Su-57 is a bigger target with inferior sensors. F-35 was quoted as -30dBsm in its infancy, and later on as -40dBsm. Probably against X-band and higher. The role you envision for a future Su-57 seems to be multirole, something most modern aircraft already do today. Has Ukraine taught you nothing? Fly high and you're prey to SAMs. Fly low and MANPADS will get you. That's the reason why the B-2B has dropped its mission as a low-level penetration bomber. It could still find use as a Maritime Strike bomber though. The solution against SAMs, MANPADS and other air defenses is a robust SEAD/DEAD campaign. The effectiveness of such a campaign can be exacerbated with stealth and jamming.

@alexk3882

11 ай бұрын

@@biancaortegaa Relax, hot guys. All this technical part, of course, is important, but there is one detail that overlaps everything. The gasket between the steering wheel and the seat.)

@alexk3882

11 ай бұрын

​@@apolloaero Relax, hot guys. All this technical part, of course, is important, but there is one detail that overlaps everything. The gasket between the steering wheel and the seat.)

One of few or maybe only channel that has most detailed explanation of every component shown on 3D model. Pros/cons regardless of origin country. Quality informative content!

Excellent unbiased explanation. That's what most "explanation channels" as I like to call them, lack -- especially when talking about Russian or Chinese technology. Videos like this don't usually mention what the thought process of the engineers were when designing said entity, and why those design choices were made.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

It actually does has pretty notable STOL capabilities, If I remember correctly, the Russian dude said it can take of in half the runway needed for another aircraft (a flanker varient, but I don't remember which).

@heatblast876

Жыл бұрын

Actually that video is totally not real, half of the information is not there and this video person saying anykind of words which doesn't make any sense. With a madeup words definitely. Because see the production model or the improved model of SU57 on Reddit, Twitter or see on Google you will know the difference, the improved model of SU57 has improved the Stealth features capabilities compared to the prototype model which is T50 and has less RAM coating with exposed rivets and back part of the engine nacelles, while the production model of SU57 has improved the Stealth capabilities with fully covered with RAM coating making it more stealthly than the prototype model T50, and this model which is show on the video is a prototype model, the new model of SU57 has new and improved cockpit module, new sensor and avionics, and offbored weapons system like the F35 and new helmet mounted display that will show the information and the range of the enemy aircraft. So this video is not so real at all, because the person has taken an prototype model which is actually an test aircraft. So it doesn't make any sense. Even that the video was not good at all.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

@@heatblast876 Thanks for the info. I've always supected that the Su-57 production version wouldn't have those exposed rivets, and poor quality build, but I couldn't really tell the difference between the production version and prototypes.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

@soft_dicc No.

@ulvicster

Жыл бұрын

They don't usually mention what the thought process of the engineers were when designing said entity, and why those design choices were made

Один из лучших!, дальнобойные ракеты, скорость, малая заметность, высокая маневренность. Нет ни одного соперника если воздушный бой будет 1на 1!

@abroom144

10 ай бұрын

Джо F16 F-35 F-22 F-15 Евро Тайфун и многие другие

At the minute 3:46 this actually is 101ks-o Directional infrared countermeasures. This shine lasers into heat seeker of the missiles like the stinger and aim 9x and thus blinding them giving them no guidance.

@doritarded

Жыл бұрын

interesting

@vctor6768

Жыл бұрын

They have several of those on the black shark helicopter, but during the Ukrainian war several of black sharks helis were shot down. Always take Russian info. With a grain of salt

@googleplex1589

Жыл бұрын

@@vctor6768 Russian? What do you mean ? These are not from russian news. Stop spreading misinformation. Russia has 200 ka 52 20 ka 50 10 ka 52sh 10 ka 52 m and 40 ka 52 newly delivered. 130 mi 28 newly ordered.

@googleplex1589

Жыл бұрын

@@vctor6768 those are sensors which alert of incoming missiles not actual turrets. Here is a quick copy from wiki. These things just detect missiles. The Nile Crocodiles use President-S airborne defense systems for protection against guided missiles.[45] The system includes both radar and laser warning receivers, MAW sensors, chaff/flare dispensers, in addition to ECM and DIRCM jammers.[46] Egyptian Ka-52s feature two new DIRCM sets installed on either side of the fuselage, which are different from the standard L370-5 sets.[47] Moreover, the laser-warning system present on the Russian variants of the Ka-52 has been removed, and a L-150 Pastel radar warning receiver has been installed instead.[45]

@vctor6768

Жыл бұрын

@@googleplex1589 have you forgotten that you said they shine laser at incoming missiles...just check what you wrote up there

Your videos only get more and more informative and better with each one! Keep it up aitelly

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Glad you like them!

I simply adore the sound this makes when flying, it's a scary yet really awesome sound

I absolutely love that you say "speculation or speculative" and don't just throw out BS talking points. Subscriber forever here

What I always liked about Russian Aircraft is the control stick is higher. As soon as you move your hand forward the stick is right there. You don’t have to reach down. The stick on the right-hand console is the perfect place to have it on fighter aircraft. When I saw that on the F-16 back in the I was impressed. A fly-by-wire stick that is not obstructing the view of the instruments. They’re placing the control stick on the right and left consoles on newer passenger aircraft too.

The R-77/M has a much farther range than that also the Felon has multiple radars.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the feedback

@4411825

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly You’re welcome 😉

@Mgaming61

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, from open sources it has a range of around 190+km or so. And it will be entering active service in 2023, unless they were ahead of schedule. Idk

@flythething193

Жыл бұрын

​@ViZolR If I recall correct even the old Flanker 2 and older DCS(Lock-on manuals mention 90 km range for the late 80´s variant of the R-77. I also reacted to the numbers from AiTelly, its like they mixed iup the R-77 with specs from an IR-missele.

@wingless747

4 ай бұрын

@@Mgaming61 Nope, I’m guessing 2040.

The most unbiased explanation video about SU-57,.. Keep up the good work! Oh BTW fun facts, F *22* + F *35* = SU *57* lol

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks a Ton For the Support. Really helps us a lot. Thanks Firman Santyabudi

@tpjv01

Жыл бұрын

187 F22 + 450 F35 = 3 SU57….your math is way off skippy.

there are a lot of important features missing like the capability of beint able to fire missiles in high angles of attack and the tail radar and jammer and the L band radar in the leading edges of the wing. Also radar absorbent coating is all over the plane not just the gray parts (this is not a new or an exotic technology), the tech looking paint job is to make it less detectable on IR cameras. It's airframe is also almost completely made out of composites which are also less detectable on radar signature.

@apolloaero

Жыл бұрын

No such thing as L-band radar on the wings. Sukhoi nor NIIP ever made that claim. The arrays are for comms and IFF. Plus, even if they were for radar, they'd be terrible. Compare their size to other modern russian L-band radars, they're massive and thr ones on the wings are tiny. That means they would need much more power and much more processing power to compensate for the terrible gain. That much power doesn't fit in the Su-57. Plus the arrays are a sinlge row, that means no vertical scanning.

@inzhener2007

Жыл бұрын

SU-57 (T-50) does not exist. It is and will be only a prototype forever. Just like the T-14 tank. Russia is incapable of innovation. at all/

@nexpro6118

Жыл бұрын

Also missing information like this...IF....those radars actually were manufactured and installed in the SU57s. Lol. Russia on paper can also tech manufacture these missiles they claim to have just like their radars they claim to have. however....Russia cannot afford to build any and doesn't have the materials either. Not to mention that the reason why, India backed out of the deal with Russia on purchasing dozens of SU57s was because India found out that the SU57 was no more "stealthy" than a slick F18 Block 3. Lmao. Also, the engines that are advertised to be on the SU57, are not actually on any of em because Russia is having issues with em and cannot manufacture any of them right and can't manufacture anymore than like 2 a year. The SU57 has rivets all over em(which is horrible for stealth) lol and has gaps all over em and the MASSIVE air intakes give off a huge radar cross section. Also, the end/rear of the engines have ZERO heat absorbing material on em and gives off a MASSIVE heat track. Lmao

@user-du6xr8ei9s

Жыл бұрын

@@nexpro6118 ну ты загнул ,конечно) 2 самолета в год 😂😂😂И непредвзят))) СУ-57 один из лучших самолетов в мире,и никто тебе точно не скажет,какими начинками он обладает …

@user-mz5hu1cs6s

Жыл бұрын

@@nexpro6118 В Индии как и в других странах есть разные политические партии и то что Индия отказалась от совместной разработки и последующего производства Су-57 означает только то, что в этот момент лидерство взяла прозападная коалиция. Насколько я знаю в Индии уже признали отказ от проекта ошибочным и хотели возобновить сотрудничество, но Россия отказалась потому что проект завершён и уже на стадии начала массового производства. F-35 по факту не может называться самолётом 5 поколения так как не может преодолеть скорость звука в бесфорсажном режиме и вообще лётчикам запрещено превышать скорость в 1800 километров в час из-за начала разрушения кромки крыла, к тому-же антирадарное покрытие быстро деградирует от воздушного потока. F-35 до сих пор не принят на вооружение в США по причине огромного числа технических недостатков которые не могут быть устранены.

Fantastic channel, love the explanations, simple but informative, the use of visual aids is brilliant too...

Great content, please keep making it!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks bro for the support

Thank u for non-biased detailed analysis of this beautiful machine wanted to see it for a long time , And congratulations for 100k u earned my sub :)

@nexpro6118

Жыл бұрын

Here's some non biased information......IF....those radars actually were manufactured and installed in the SU57s. Lol. Russia on paper can also tech manufacture these missiles they claim to have just like their radars they claim to have. however....Russia cannot afford to build any and doesn't have the materials either. Not to mention that the reason why, India backed out of the deal with Russia on purchasing dozens of SU57s was because India found out that the SU57 was no more "stealthy" than a slick F18 Block 3. Lmao. Also, the engines that are advertised to be on the SU57, are not actually on any of em because Russia is having issues with em and cannot manufacture any of them right and can't manufacture anymore than like 2 a year. The SU57 has rivets all over em(which is horrible for stealth) lol and has gaps all over em and the MASSIVE air intakes give off a huge radar cross section. Also, the end/rear of the engines have ZERO heat absorbing material on em and gives off a MASSIVE heat track. Lmao

@notanormie6533

Жыл бұрын

@@nexpro6118 Well they produce their engine's themselves and India backed off from the deal because it took to much delay in the program and they failed to deliver it on time, but ya it is a little less stealthy.

@ayushmanhas1035

5 ай бұрын

@@nexpro6118 it just took too much time India is developing its own amca stealth 5th gen which will prolly be ready by 2025

@nexpro6118

5 ай бұрын

@@ayushmanhas1035 except....that's not at all what, India said..lol. that's what YOU personally want it to be because YOU have a biased opinion that you act as if it's fact....I don't blame you...people today for some reason HATE being wrong on things and have this MASSIVE NEED to be 1000% right on EVERYTHING....India said, the SU57 was/is not performing up to the capabilities that Russia was and is still claiming. Not to mention, Russia isn't even using the new engine that's supposed to be in the SU57 and Russia is using the AL engines that are on the SU27s....facts over feelings and facts over personal biased opinions....

Great looking jet. It's not the MIG-31 Firefox from the movie, but it's getting there :D Great video.

Very nice video! Also congratulations on the sponsor :)

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks You We have to earn from somewhere to Support the next Animator we are hiring

Such a beautiful aircraft.

I love T-50.

There was no mention that Su-57 has 6 radars, which is unprecedented, and provides high level of detection of any threats from any possible angle.

@preludeh22a57

11 ай бұрын

Actually it's 5- they've dropped rear radar from mass production model. But 2 side radars in the front and 2 L-band radars in wings- that alone makes it... I don't know, a 7th generation fighter? I mean Russian as usually went their own way. What is a 6th gen? Full stealth or full surveillance availability? Different paths... and that what makes it interesting for me being a side observer

@thewatchman9540

5 ай бұрын

@@preludeh22a57no its 6 radars

Gotta give it to the Russians/Sukhoi. What a beautiful bird 😍

Great work!!!😊😇👏🏻 And thank you☺️☺️

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 🙏👍🙏

After the Ukraine war, I take alot of Russian weapons information with a grain of salt. The Kamov Ka-52 "Alligator" was supposedly able to blind any missile that comes at it, it ended up not being so

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

:)

@jayjay53313

Жыл бұрын

Ka-52 doesn't have missile blinder. Ka-52 is supposed to be missile carrier utilizing its radar & FLIR targeting pod detecting & launching Vikhr or other missiles from far without getting into MANPADS or AAA effective range. Unfortunately Russia is too poor to get enough multi-purpose air to ground missiles for Ka-52, Mi-28 & 4th generation aircraft

@user-kc8ou3kc9n

Жыл бұрын

After the Yugoslavs shot down your invisibility with the old Soviet air defense systems and 31 Apache helicopters were lost in Iraq👍🙂 I also don’t really trust your equipment! so this is a war and don’t doubt Russian weapons! It only says that you haven't seen the Yankees yet!

@spinningsquare1325

Жыл бұрын

You can never blind a british starstreak missile because it has some special guidance

@jayjay53313

Жыл бұрын

@@spinningsquare1325 Ka-52 uses chaff flare countermeasures that work on IR & radar guided missiles. They don't work against laser guided missile. Laser blinder only fitted on advanced tanks and it has angle limitation

Its so stealth, that it dosent even excist!

It is possible that the point of the thrust vectoring isn't purely supermaneuverability or short take-offs, but also overall stability. (I think) an F-14 pilot, who flew in formation behind an F-22, saw that the nozzles of the jet were twitching many times a second. The fly-by-wire system of the F-22 uses thrust vectoring to correct the flight path of the aerodynamically unstable airframe. The same could probably be said about the Su-57. It is much more aerodynamically efficient to use thrust vectoring instead of the flight control surfaces in that situation, as it reduces the drag of those moving surfaces and might potentially reduce the probability of detection by radar. Another theory is that sudden strange, unnatural changes of the flight path caused by the thrust vectoring might somehow mess with a missiles ability to predict the aircraft's movement.

Su57 has many feats to have super maneuverability which is not a goal characteristic of 5th gens since 5th gens are designed for stealth and less dogfight situations, since u shouldnt be detected at the 1st place.

@JolaNat

Жыл бұрын

you're right, but let's say our sukoi got tracked by radar, and hostlie air units are told do destroy the Sukoi, then with the super maeuvrerability i can escape some situation and maybe came out victorious

@igorvasin6960

Жыл бұрын

among Americans and this is a common way to choose a function that loses in their technique and declare that this is an unnecessary function so it does not count as an advantage! but when this feature appears in your next version of technology, Americans usually immediately call it an advantage!

@srcastic8764

Жыл бұрын

You have to remember too though that the F35’s strength lies not in one on one, but in the fact it can network with other fighters through the operating theater and direct them to wherever needed. It should never be caught in a one v one situation when deployed correctly.

@atanasvasilev3228

Жыл бұрын

Back in the days, there was speculation that the Ussr injected the stealth technology in to USA, so that they can have flying ducks. Slow planes with less armament. Of course this isn't true, but what if the f-35 is being targeted way closer to the SAMs by 30km, compared to the SU-57? The speed difference and armament will very much even the field. Not to mention the range, since you will be able to launch SU-57s further within Russian territory, which gives it actual stealth advantage.

@khalee95

Жыл бұрын

NATO air doctrine is to put down enemy air superiority and then use long range missile strikes from offshore weapons and high altitude strikes via drones and fighter jets. The enemy should not detect the planes or drones sending the missile.

The su-57 is equipped with 6 radars, each compartment has 3 k-77 missiles with a range of up to 190 km. there are 6 K-77 missiles in total, and two short-range IR missiles. also, 4 r-37m missiles with a range of up to 400 km (against AWACS) can be installed in two large compartments the "bulges" behind the cockpit and under the cockpit are a multispectral laser, it blinds the IR guidance heads of missiles. also , an electronic warfare system is installed at the ends of the wings . SU57 is equipped with AI, it allows you to land and fly without a pilot, and fight without a pilot

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Great Informative Comment

Just did you amazing guys a SOLID! Keep it up the great work! Cheers from Malaysia

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for your support

i like your works good job for making this 3d video you got a sub :)

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the sub! we are truly Humble.

Valuable info, thanks alot for the visual demonstration of SU-57👏❤

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it! Thanks man

Make a video also about the J-20 stealth fighter of China.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes will do

The narration is so good and calm .

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

Loaded. Liked . Subbed!

Actually, Su-57 has radio-absorbing paint cover on engines, it's transparent and based on ceramics (because of engine heat). Modern modifications of F-15, F-16 and also Su-27, Su-30 and Su-35 have that type of paint on engines too. F-35 has flat nozzle to reduce infrared heat trace, but flat nozzle is not capable of thrust vectoring, which reduces maneuverability. Engineers chosen thrust vectoring on Su-57 to keep maneuverability. To reduce heat trace they decided to work on fuel burning efficiency of jet engine and they're still working on it, new engine is not in serial production. Su-57 has multi-radars, it's been officially shown and so on. F-22 was designed with same multi-radars, just F-22 was too expensive at that time and government asked to make it cheaper, so finally engineers removed multi-radars from F-22 to reduce unit cost. Important feature of Su-57 multi-radars might be ability to detect missle strikes from behind and guide own missle to intercept enemy missle (it has designed to have at least one missle, placed backwards to others). But officially it's not approved, just appeared information of such tests, results are still unknown.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Great Comment here Love these feedbcak from the audiences. Regarding the radar absorbing paint on the engine will have to verify.

@thecommentator3732

Жыл бұрын

The F-35 doesnt need TVC tho Its already really maneuverable Heres a video of an F-35 doing a crazy maneuver:kzread.infocdp8IKJIqxA?feature=share

@imaginarystranger1974

Жыл бұрын

In other words, Su-57 is like any other modified Gen 4 aircraft.

@tshidisootukile5269

Жыл бұрын

As I said before that Russia don't buy and they go all out to bring the top class weapons that is hard to contest with or build the same by other countries 👌💯🌎

@thecommentator3732

Жыл бұрын

@@tshidisootukile5269 What so Top class about their military? They literally supply their own troops with fake vest and plastic helmets

I've seen close-ups of the Su-57. I have to appreciate that they are still making the machines where so much of the work is forged by hand. Good old school that doesn't get influenced by modern trends.

@PrefoX

Жыл бұрын

because its a second world country... they don't have good tech and now they produce tanks from the 60s xD

@nexpro6118

Жыл бұрын

Good ol' old school Done by hand which makes gaps and a bunch of rivets on the airframe...which...by the way, is HORRIBLE for wanting to be stealthy lol 😂

the indian air force pulled out of the project citing "low performance and quality control" which concurs with the chinese accessment when sukhoi tried to pitch it to them (russian has been trying to find a cost sharing partner for good part of the decade)

Also the tail sting* is from the early prototypes. It needs to be longer and pointier. * = BTW, it's good for aerodynamics as well as a RADAR housing.

Полное превосходство.

the day before yesterday, 4 serial Su-57s were rolled out from the factory. Starting from the 25th year, it will go into the second-generation Su-57 series with new engines and avionics adapted to new weapons. But so far there is little information about how they were tested in real battles in Ukraine

@junkookbts1273

Жыл бұрын

That's 9 Su-57 in 2 years Lol

@dauzlee2827

Жыл бұрын

​@@junkookbts1273 according to the manufacturer they are about to increase production to about more than a dozen per year, enough to fullfil 76 jet order from Russian Air Force before around 2027

@veerchand2129

Жыл бұрын

@@dauzlee2827 sure sure we all believe it won’t be embezzled and they’ll find a way to access foreign components they don’t make, meanwhile a new f-35 gets made every 3 days and USAFs NGAD will begin deliveries by then. Remember how many t-14 were supposed to be built? Or how many next gen thermal imagers were supposed to be built? Vaporwear and criminality.

@grumpydinosaur2347

Жыл бұрын

giving that much of this requires high end tech, and Russia is under heavy sanctions, there will be no new technologies for su-57. and there will be no su-57 mass production

@user-un7yu1oo5y

Жыл бұрын

@@dauzlee2827 war is about capital. Russia is poor, that's why it's losing. Of course it has great war potential, but it seems powerless comparing to the US economy and manufacturing capabilities. Hundreds of F22s and F35s are already made and deployed for several years, the Russians can never keep up.

US: WRITE THAT DOWN!!!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes finally someone commented. Otherwise all the Americans were complaining to the CIA that we were releasing classified material.

Love the details in such a short 10 mins videos

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank You

It looks so sleek....

Awesome video, love it But one correction:it's Tejas not Te'g'as BTW what software do you use for making these animations , so smooth🔥🔥

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the feedback Blender 3D model

@_SaptakDatta__Sci

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly Cool!

I'm only here to enjoy the Assassin's Creed Brotherhood final mission music lmao seriously great content, love these animations and how you explain the technology behind all these mind-boggling weapons

I was waiting for him. very good 👍👍

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Glad you like it. Thank You.

Badass maneuvering jet

T50 is prototype, like T10 for Su 27. And PAK FA means - Perspektivniy Aviacionniy Komlex Frontovoy Aviacii, what means Perspective Aviation Complex of Front-line Aviation. Also right now Su 57 has almost same engines like Su 35, it is as powerful as F22, but not as powerful as izdelie 30, can't fly Mach 2 without afterburner like izdelia 30, also has no stealth compared izdelie 30. Russia said that in 2023-25 it will put these engines on the Su 57. then the serial operation of the Su 57 will begin..

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Great Informative Comment 👍 Thanks for sharing

@genem895

Жыл бұрын

Su 35 engines are completely different from su 57. Su 57 already flying with izdelie 30 engines.

@mEDIUMGap

11 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly and also "izdelie" - eaze-deh-lee-yeh

the SU-57 is not a 5th generation fighter but a 4++ generation fighter.

She's a beauty of all modern fighter jet

Good job from all of your team.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

only two of us in our team.Just hired another Animator

@tydengr

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly how long you make a video?

As always, incredible❣! but this video got a bit late 😓

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

3D animation takes time

your videos are realy inspiring me, pls continue making videos allso make a video about the lnacet drone

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, we will,Just hired one more animator, So more more Videos coming this week

Ah yes, the jet so good Russia is afraid to use it 😂

The disadvantages of Su 57 are just assumptions and speculations not facts

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

:) heheh

@jayvee8914

Жыл бұрын

So as it's advantages

@ElToronski

Жыл бұрын

Like most of its capabilities lol

@davidarreola2408

Жыл бұрын

How do You know?

There is no needle on the nose cone of Su-57. There was one on prototype PAK FA.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes we had removed in the later part of the video.

Don't know how many times I've rewatched this video😅

So much detailing in a short video good job guys. A feedback there is an error it's not LCA TEGAS it's LCA TEJAS

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes we saw that . LCA tejas coming soon this Month

Wow 400km radar range, that thing is more powerful than awacs radar...

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thats what the Russian Engineers said on Paper. one way to find out is in the open Battle field

@oxyet2256

Жыл бұрын

@Huh Huhman SU-57 were not used in Ukraine, I don’t know about this case, but could rather be an MIG-31

@spinningsquare1325

Жыл бұрын

@@oxyet2256 officially su-57 has seen combat but the missile that hit a su-27 could have been launched by a mig-31

@dew7025

Жыл бұрын

@@spinningsquare1325 no proof

@spinningsquare1325

Жыл бұрын

@Huh Huhmancould be mig 31

Not eezoly 300, but eezdeliye 300 which means product 300. You guys should consult a Russian speaking guy how to pronounce those words. If you care, of course.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thansk for the feedback. Russian language is tough for us.

@ijontichy7179

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly well, not for me :) Please contact anytime :) Love your videos, btw.

3:47 It seems to me that the R2-D2 robot is actually sitting there ... I wonder if the Su-57 is capable of spacewalking and spreading its wings like an X-shaped fighter?

Nice contents out there very educational. Just be careful when typing because some words are spelled incorrectly or some letters are missing. All in all very nice content.

It's not the plane, it's the pilot!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

yea your right !

@user-vj6dc8le8h

Жыл бұрын

Его "учили" (буквально!) летать лучшие пилоты России. Я имею в виду Искуственный Интеллект. Так что ты прав.

So stealthy they have never been seen!

@pmnichols10

Жыл бұрын

It was used for the first time in Syria (four of them if I'm not mistaken) and are now being used in Ukraine in larger numbers for some unstated purpose, probably further testing of their stand off capabilities, I don't think the Russians want to give Ukraine a chance of being the first ones to bag a SU57;)

@datman5518

Жыл бұрын

@@pmnichols10 I was joking, but yeah I heard that Ukraine has already been sending info about downed Russian equipment to NATO so it figures

@vitsobotka6268

Жыл бұрын

@@pmnichols10 "larger numbers" They literally have like 2 operational serial Su-57s...

@pmnichols10

Жыл бұрын

@@vitsobotka6268 That's just not true, no one disputes the fact they had (or still have) four in Syria. They are meant to operate in groups of four and there is at least one more group operating in the Ukraine or more probably around it. And the Russians announced a few months ago that they have stepped up their production and and are making deliveries earlier than expected, I would be very surprised if they don't already have at least 16...newer motors included. In my opinion Putin wouldn't be caught doing some of the remarks he made in the last 48h if SU57 wasn't, if not fully operational, at least ready to show the west a sample of what they're up against if or when Russia acquires large numbers of them.

3:44 I thought, it was R2-D2)

That is a thing of beauty!

Amazing technology 😃

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes

The mighty F 35 that crashes itself more then it crashes enemies.

@zebimicio5204

Жыл бұрын

The Su57 literally had the same issue. And the service ready ones are below 10! At least with how frequent the F35 crashes are, they still had 400+ more to go

@snowpiercer4777

Жыл бұрын

@@zebimicio5204 yeah it means it will crash 400 times 😂

@zebimicio5204

Жыл бұрын

@@snowpiercer4777 the ration of crashes the f35 had was 1:100 while the felon's was 1:3.

@hztn

Жыл бұрын

- Now compare the percantage of crashed F35 and SU57: Su57 made only 3 pieces, and one of them was just burned.

@snowpiercer4777

Жыл бұрын

@@hztn who told you there are only 3 pieces ? biden or zelensky? 😂 😂 😂

the whole meaning of stealth is that some high tech radar can detect even a f22, but an anti aircraft missile can not be locked. but if the radar scanning match the perfect timing when a missile bay is opened, then the chances of locking the anti aircraft missile is much higher, that technology maybe existing or will be ready in a decade or so. thats why now their concentrating on 6th gen fighters

su57 is a platform for the 6th generation

Thanks for such a nice video. One thing is incorrect, in my opinion. You have mentioned that range of R-77 missile is 5-25 KM, that is wrong actually (07:15). The flight altitude of R-77 is 5-25 KM, where the range of R77 is about 100 KM+, comparable to American AIM-120 AMRAAM (depending on the variants).

It's cheaper than f35 & f22. su 57 is fifth gen, if deal is Made in India + technology transfer+ spares manufacturing facilities in India + others necessary weapons manufacturing facilities in india + jet Engine for Amca with technology transfer+ cheaper crude oil long term contract upto 50 yrs at lower prices around 45 $ per barrels to fly the aircraft. It may proved to be a excellent deal.

@krish4u85

Жыл бұрын

Yes, we need just to counter China and Pakistan

@krish4u85

Жыл бұрын

It's more than enough

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

😌

su 57 is like a tie fighter, more faster and built for air superiority. the f35 is just cool like the xwing

@wingless747

4 ай бұрын

correct, f-35 is better than su-57 😊

Reminds me of white shark with camouflage,perfect predator

Thanks for showing LCA Tejas 🇮🇳🙏🏻

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Coming for India Republic day 👍

@myt3734

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly independence day Aug 15th or republic day on Jan 26th

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@myt3734 Thanks Corrected it 26th Jan Coming next week

Instead of kuznetsov, I think they gonna use project 2300 Shtorm for Su57 Fellon. (If I'm not mistaken there's a documentary about this project on RT news, before it get banned)

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

We just worte the Script to what the Russian Engineers said. But again at the end you will Find it's Pros and Cons.

@vandasaragosa

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly yes I understand, and I did the same as what I was knew and the documentary is still there on their site tho. Or you may can make a video about "Shtorm" , that gona be cool

@mastermariner490

Жыл бұрын

@@vandasaragosa Have you seen the state of the russian military in Ukraine?And Russias economy will go down the drain soon with no income from Europe. Dont have your hopes up to high

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@vandasaragosa Will do believe it or not ,We are learning from people like you beacaue we are not Experts. Thansk for the feedback

@vandasaragosa

Жыл бұрын

@@mastermariner490 I don't care about that much .. but if you want this okay, also as I know Russia build briics (rumor says Saudi have interest to join in,source WION) they may not have support from the west but the Russian gona have another solution Wich is Asia and Africa (3rd country mainly raw materials producer , Africa and Asia is the biggest raw material suppliers and the cheapest) Wich is much more beneficial for the Russian and it will increase the price on EU since the supply of material from those two will dominated by the Russian.. We already know gas price increasing dramatically else where but in Russia and Asia (idk about Africa)

Amazing content!!!!!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

thanks

Very good informative and innovative useful war machine technology video....!

Well explained, I love the animation, but the information about the range of the r77 missile is inaccurate.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

appreciate the Feedback will improve

@imd-in67

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly you're the best 👍

excelente seus vídeos, parabéns pelo excelente conteúdo. it makes the Gripen ng of brazil

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank You

It's not the plane, it's the pilot

“Fifth generation enemy fighters!”

за 12 лет после первого полета произвели всего 16 штук. Он очень дорогой для Российской экономики

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Да согласен

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@Huh Huhman Yes!

@user-vj6dc8le8h

Жыл бұрын

Но все же пошла серия.. Это же неплохо. Потом и изделие 30 подтянется. Нужно понимать что при разработке (верне, доработке) Т50 техзадание менялось трижды(!). Военные они же как дети, стоит им сказать что вот такие-то возможности могут быть лучше если еще несколько доработать, то они тут же "ведутся" на это. Такие "жадные", знаете ли..))

@AlexNSK1

Жыл бұрын

@@user-vj6dc8le8h Это не серия. Это все штучные образцы. за 12 лет сделали 16 штук. У меня отец в советское время работал на чкаловском авиазаводе. так там производили по 15 самолетов в месяц. На тот момент производили су 24. 1 самолет каждые 2 дня.!!! Вот это я понимаю- серийное производство

@user-vj6dc8le8h

Жыл бұрын

@@AlexNSK1 Ну, во первых, не стоит сравнивать 57й и 24й... Совсем разные вещи. Как запорожец(неплохая машина, кстати) и Аурус. Разный момент сложности и возможностей. Тот же су-запорожец рождался 10 лет, это при том что в СССР работали за дёшево и государство вбухивало денег по требованию партии сколько угодно. Социализм.. За су57 наконец-то взялись тоже лет 10-12 назад, и оказалось что пришлось заново все прорабатывать. Сегодня композиты в нем около 70%. Тех задание трижды меняли на повышение характеристик. И сделали. За 10-12 лет это мегакруто с учетом сложности машины. Последние 4шт сделали за пару месяцев. Теперь штук даже по 20-30 в год будет весьма нехило.. Так что извини, СССР отдыхает.

It's a shame they couldn't find any export partners to fully develop this. It could have been a great aircraft.

@agrajyadav2951

11 ай бұрын

Do u guys not get tired lying to yourself?

@AWtify

11 ай бұрын

Russians do not use imports for critical technologies. They send simplified versions for export including imported components. Some types of weapons cannot leave the borders of Russia at all because of secrecy.

Awesome video

the russians forgot more about kite design than the americans ever knew

The f35 is probably better than the su57 in terms of stealth and air superiority, and the su 57 is better as a typical fighter (super maneuverability). That's why it's hard to compare them because they are made for different tasks

The russian air force has received their new batch of completed SU 57, I believe is about 11 because they are planning to have 22 more by 2024

@PrefoX

Жыл бұрын

who cares, there won't be russia anymore in a few years

@Elver_Galarga816

Жыл бұрын

@@PrefoX schizo

Isn't the cobra move when you pull up and continue going horizontal?

They just made a revolutionary claim in that it's missiles can shoot down air to air and surface to air missiles aimed at it. Our planes might get the first shot more often due to an edge in stealth but if it can detect and shoot down missiles, it has a better chance of getting in close where it has an advantage.

Great video, beautiful plane, amazing on paper...How Russia can produce it without access to western high tech components and electronics? Will it be another T 14 Armata - all hype and then just a couple of prototypes that break down during parades? How can a country poorer than Italy afford significant fleet, airforce, ground forces, nuclear arsenal on it's own?

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

It might be hype but we should not underestimate the enemy. Just saying

@novosib9017

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly Well now we know your side :D

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@novosib9017 It's more like a figure of Speech : Keep your friends close keep your enemy Closer. Infact engineering knows no boundary.🙂

@alexanderlunacharsky96

Жыл бұрын

Russia is poorer than Italy? That's tidings tho! As a sociologist (PhD student yet) I find this question debatable enough. At least in PPP terms, the Russian economy is 6 positions higher than the Italian economy. Also, I wouldn't call Italy a poor country, despite the horrific southern regions. The same problem is typical for Russia - some regions are very developed, and some are very poor, because with the advent of the market economy production there has become unprofitable and meaningless, and if there is no production, then there is no well-being. In any case, there is no correlation here. Russia stands on the wreckage of socialist civilization, so it is able to develop former technology and have its own production. Especially in the military-industrial complex, which was not taken over by foreign capital after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Russia (USSR) was the first in the world to build a modular space station. And now Russia has its own module on the ISS (modules from other countries are shared). Nowadays, Russia is a leader in nuclear power and already uses fast-neutron reactors. It also has a nuclear icebreaker fleet, which is being actively replenished. While the U.S. is building nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, Russia is building nuclear-powered civilian ships (icebreakers and floating nuclear power plants). Russia built the world's first nuclear power plant, the first to launch a man into space. And now it has all these technologies and is actively developing them (although it could do better). The issue of Russia's advanced technologies and achievements is a matter of media coverage. And the world's media is owned by Western capital, which does not benefit from coverage of such issues. And the Russian media themselves are not up to the task.

@novosib9017

Жыл бұрын

@@alexanderlunacharsky96 Very good points. I never understood why they underestimated Russia. Perhaps seeing the 90's convinced them Russia is lost. But after 30 years Russia has become what the USSR was (not at its peak) but following a very parallel path. The Brains are there, the Tech is there, The resources are there. The textbooks are there. To Underestimate Russia is a very foolish outlook. One thing though, a lot of the USSR achievements were made also by satellite states, which today Russia lacks, so its still a long road. Lets not forget, the tech of the 50's and 70's is not the tech of today, and under these huge sanctions, it may be a very long road. Sure the food is in the stores, but what happens when Russia will need MRI machines and its "allies" succumb to anti Russian Sanctions?.

8:35 Can supercruise at mach 1.3 (at altitude). So without afterburners that's the max speed it can achieve at an altitude of above 2.5km.

They miss mention the new radar technology ROFAR will apply to SU-57 will become new game changer for modern air combat