I like to think that he carry’s that piece of rubber everywhere and has it ready for this specific question

@Lance.Valle1

5 күн бұрын

😂😂😂

@jonahshapiro2707

5 күн бұрын

They bring on props for the interview

@vaeppur

5 күн бұрын

@@jonahshapiro2707 congratulations, you killed the joke

@mookinbabysealfurmittens

5 күн бұрын

​@@vaeppur(つ'°ᗝ°`)つ

@halahala2886

5 күн бұрын

He does

I'm really sure he can explain quantum physics to a 5yo

@spohg2887

9 ай бұрын

No one really understands quantum physics

@george_davituri

9 ай бұрын

Yep

@rubyganta6869

9 ай бұрын

There's a book called Quantum physics for babies. It helps kids understand it. That's how I understood. 😂😅

@angrygary122

7 ай бұрын

Plot twist thats the most complex description that he has.(of course not)

@argjendveseli3592

7 ай бұрын

@@spohg2887nobody really understands anything

This man is so cool. I appreciate science communicators who don’t sound or act condescending while explaining.

@newjojosupercutsandmore2489

2 күн бұрын

Absolutely agree, there are a lot that sound too full of themselves

@manifestinggyou

Күн бұрын

This guy can make studying the most fun thing to do

@LetHimRead

Күн бұрын

He is a great teacher and communicator but watching his videos is not "studying" unless we are talking the HS level.

@OmnipotentEnt

15 сағат бұрын

Idk why people idolize assholes like NDT when people like Michio Kaku exist

@Jake_C75

14 сағат бұрын

Unlike Neil degrasse tyson

I was once in a small fender bender on the interstate - no one was seriously injured. Michio Kaku was the first person on the scene and made sure everyone understood the basics of quantum mechanics before leaving and letting the first-responders load us into ambulances

@WerewolfofEpicness

5 күн бұрын

underrated comment tbh

@lionheart9557

5 күн бұрын

Hero.

@jonathantaylor7167

4 күн бұрын

😂

@gyinagal

4 күн бұрын

Amazing!

@dark8prince201

4 күн бұрын

🤥

This video (the original one, not this short) was the first time i actually understood the theory after trying to do so for about 4 months. After that he immediately became one of my favorite physics teacher

@jigglypuff_foryoutube1700

9 ай бұрын

He seems so willing to teach as well

@Ripen3

9 ай бұрын

Too bad its wrong😂

@rainmanj9978

9 ай бұрын

​@@Ripen3what you mean? How's it wrong?

@argynkuketayev4166

9 ай бұрын

@@rainmanj9978it’s not even wrong 😂

@mohaofa1544

8 ай бұрын

it means it's not a theory just a framework@@rainmanj9978

They say the deepest understanding is portrayed through the least amount of words!

@ProtusMose

15 күн бұрын

That's valid. Another saying I like is "If you can't explain a complex concept to your grandmother, you don't understand it well enough."

@MicheleOverton-mb8it

9 күн бұрын

Occam's Razor, though I'm probably spelling it incorrectly. It's a beautiful explanation of simplicity usually being accurate and very worth a Google💖

@redace4821

8 күн бұрын

​@@ProtusMoseRead the same thing but it's 5 years old and not grandma.

@SoffiCitrus

7 күн бұрын

This is what stupid people say to cope with not wanting to put in the effort to actually learn anything

@titmusspaultpaul5

6 күн бұрын

You are spot on.

I can feel warmth and kindness in his voice.A good man.

I just love listening to him. What talent and skill he has to break it down so that I can understand. Such a brilliant man. Utmost respect to Dr. Kaku

@EEEEEEEE

Күн бұрын

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

During my school days, I once saw Michio Kaku's narration on Discovery Science that I started watching that channel and got into Science.

@JackReacher110

5 ай бұрын

*But after watched video clips Kaku discussing with Prof Roger Penrose about 26 dimensions in String Theory, many people thought String Theory is just scientific fiction. 😅*

@ModernStupidity-qm3rj

2 ай бұрын

@@JackReacher110 because it is a fiction, @erastrotalked about it a year ago in her yt video.

@dreamervanroom

17 күн бұрын

@@ModernStupidity-qm3rjI see your nick.

@chhana101

15 күн бұрын

hes good for sparking interest in science, but as the saying goes "Science doesnt say anything,Scientist does." So he can be biased also not to blame him.

@kazmir5429

9 күн бұрын

Same bro

This man is a legend!!!!!!

@robert48719

9 ай бұрын

Nope, he really exists. You've just seen him

@jigglypuff_foryoutube1700

9 ай бұрын

@@robert48719hmmmm idk he could be a hologram

@notsoberoveranalyzer8264

9 ай бұрын

@@robert48719You’re English skills aren’t the strongest, huh? No worries, honestly only looking at your writing it seems quite good. I recommend looking up “Hyperbole” it’s extremely common for native English speakers to use this. It’s a little tricky getting used to it, if you didn’t grow up with it, but you got this! Another example would be: Someone saying: “I feel 1,000,000 times better!” They don’t literally mean that they’re feeling a million times better, but that they’re feeling incredibly well.

@VIKTORSCHAUBERGERscammersONyt

7 ай бұрын

Of corruption butt a legend for ignorant daydreamers.

@ModernStupidity-qm3rj

2 ай бұрын

watch angela collier about string theory and him.

The sign of a truly intelligent person is that they can explain any concept to anyone, knowing how to simplify to make it easier to understand, but also keeping it true.

A lucid and simple explanation denotes true mastery of a subject.

All fine and dandy until the question of "What are the strings made of?" is brought up 😅

@9196dreamers

3 күн бұрын

Exactly. Theories upon theories are in the end still not facts

@AxolotlInMC

3 күн бұрын

​@@9196dreamers They can be in science

@alfonsoavila8602

3 күн бұрын

They're made of nothing, they're pure Energy

@RaviModiya-wc7vy

3 күн бұрын

It's wave 👋🏿

@96vipul

3 күн бұрын

@@9196dreamerstheories are attestable facts... What's not proven is called a hypothesis... Unless you can prove a hypothesis it's not a theory... So take these theories as facts as they are the truest representation of our understanding of things as humans... Unless you are a believer and will believe in anything that's written in some weird holy book and run with it without the pursuit of the real truth

Reminds of Feynman's challenge. This explanation was beautiful and elegant in its simplicity.

@pathfinder7544

7 күн бұрын

I was thinking the same thing!

@windytubeful

5 күн бұрын

Is that the Higgs Champaign bottle winning cocktail party analogy?

Thank you so much! If I had a teacher like you, I wouldn't have failed Physics.

being able to simplify any explanation for any level is a sign of deep and true understanding

I love Michio Kaku and his passion for string theory. Its unfortunate theres zero evidence to support it.

@qwut9544

6 күн бұрын

I don’t need evidence! I support his passion for String Theory unconditionally :^)

@Lynn7015hb

6 күн бұрын

Hence the term "theory."

@qwut9544

6 күн бұрын

@@Lynn7015hb please explain.

@JdJuarez13

6 күн бұрын

​@@Lynn7015hbtheories aren't like you think they are. In science, something needs to go through a lot of experiments to get enough information and proof to consider that maybe it's true, and then, it becomes a theory. There are a lot of examples of theories in the past that at the time, people though that were real (like how the evolution in the animals worked or how actually a cell looked like, for example), but whit the technological advances, those theories changed. Sorry if you don't understand because English isn't my first language, but y hope you get the idea ;).

@_apsis

6 күн бұрын

@@qwut9544i support his passion, just not string theory

That's actually kinda interesting!

I first heard Michio Kaku on an old late night radio show called 'Coast to Coast' with Art Bell. It was fascinating to here Michio talk about physics for 2 or 3 hours.

@abunchahooey

4 күн бұрын

Oh my gosh, I remember that radio show! Hadn’t thought of it in years. I want it back now. 😊

@jamesbuttery3862

4 күн бұрын

Still listen to Art on a regular basis. My favorite shows are Mad Man Markum and Andrew Basiago time traveler

Absolute sign of a genius who can explain something so complicated in such simple manner.

String theory was strong in the 90s and 00s but now just fade away into oblivion

@josefdrapak1889

9 күн бұрын

How would you know that

@FordFourD-aka-Ford4D

9 күн бұрын

@@josefdrapak1889It's well known in the field that string theory hasn't had any experimental evidence or proven anything despite over 40 years of uncounted people unfortunately devoting their careers to it. It's basically just interesting math that looks elegant on paper, but very *very* likely is just a rabbit hole of "fantasy" physics.

@alvaroluffy1

9 күн бұрын

@@FordFourD-aka-Ford4D you could have said that about robotics 2 years ago and look at it now, all of those people that devoted 30, 40, 50 years of their lifes, it was all worth it. You never know when youre near a breakthrough, we have to keep pushing, on all frontiers, and that includes the unlikely ones. And maybe string theory is not as unlikely as we tend to think, it could be just incomplete, not wrong

@ChrisCDXX

8 күн бұрын

opinions and facts... sometimes we confuse the two.

@jeffbenton6183

8 күн бұрын

​@@ChrisCDXXIt's not just an opinion. The Theory is untestable. You can find several scientists expressing pretty much what the OP just said on KZread.

The professor anyone would have dreamed to have

@michael.forkert

4 күн бұрын

_Everyone?? You must be kidding. He’s a reincarnation of Einstein, in an asiatic, or slit eyed version._ 😂

Michio Kaku's physics videos are fascinating.

This is why the world needs Prof. Michio Kaku.

Dot hits dot that hit multiple dots and those dots hits more multiple dots = nuclear explosion

@Mortisem

9 ай бұрын

Lol, lmao even

@billyhess5263

9 ай бұрын

Dot matrix…

@robert48719

4 ай бұрын

Ummm okay, I think he intended to explain something different

@elstyblue

4 ай бұрын

Have the people at CERN and the other 30,000 particle accelerators on Earth heard about your Big Bang theory? Or are they too busy hiding the Dark Matter Mass they create everyday.

@crystalm4324

16 күн бұрын

Wait… don’t you have to split some dots before you can actually get a nuclear explosion 💥? I’m pretty sure dots bump into each other infinitely every single day.

He’s presenting string theory as though it’s been verified by extensive experimentation and is an accepted theory. It’s not

@brock9380

14 күн бұрын

In fact at this point it's discredited.

@Quantum789

12 күн бұрын

Exactly just elegant math showing off

@muranki4150

12 күн бұрын

was looking for a comment like this!

@pipegris

12 күн бұрын

The question was to explain String theory, which he did. Nothing about this video is pretending to assess the theory's validity

@cozmonauts932

12 күн бұрын

He literally starts off saying you can put an electron under a microscope as if we could even fathom of a way to view electrons with a microscope

I was once in a rescue situation getting a hurt climber off a radio tower. _Michio Kaku was the first person on the scene and made sure everyone understood the basics of quantum mechanics before leaving and letting the first-responders load us into ambulances_

String theory should have died a long time ago, but too many careers are based on it.

@kadewilliams7925

Ай бұрын

It's too rich to die. It just shouldn't be taught as fact like Michu Kaiku and others who've based their entire careers behind it do. It's a good framework as long as you keep in mind it's probably not correct.

@SeveralGhost

24 күн бұрын

I too have no qualifications and have strong opinions about physics theories

@rajeev_kumar

24 күн бұрын

String theory is nonsense.

@pipegris

12 күн бұрын

Strong theory is... wait for it... a theory. Shocking

@justinstewart4889

12 күн бұрын

​@@pipegris Tell me you don't know what a theory is without telling me

If this is the case why don’t they just teach it like this to begin with instead of confusing people with dots 😭

@TheVochiba

9 ай бұрын

Because string theory is not even close to be proved at all, it's just one of many theories of everything, none of which is proved yet.

@TON__618.

9 ай бұрын

Because we don't really know if they are, its just a theory.

@SnowRose-wn6gj

9 ай бұрын

​@@TON__618. Yes that is true, although in science 'theory' refers to something that has proof and plausibility backing it without being a fully proven fact. The normal use of theory would actually be a 'hypothesis'.

@TON__618.

9 ай бұрын

@@SnowRose-wn6gj Well, while you are right we need to call it a theory even if it is not. This is because it is the only "hypothesis" that can combine all our laws, or more popularly known as "the theory of everything".

@SnowRose-wn6gj

9 ай бұрын

@@TON__618. Oh, well then i learned something new today, thanks!

Bro im a teenager and im not even fluent in english and i undertood this. THIS is a good teacher

This man Michio kaku and Neil Tyson made my childhood awesome!! Have watched them for whole days on discovery 😄😄😄

String theory is so brilliant that it can’t be tested and has never produced anything.

@AstronomyAdmirer

Ай бұрын

You obviously have never researched this topic, and decided to sound ignorant by commenting on something you don’t understand

@AstronomyAdmirer

Ай бұрын

@@amarug okay so basically, the problem with our current standard model of particle physics and Einsteins GR is they fail to describe gravity at the quantum level, the math breaks down. String theory, or now superstring theory, allows gravity to be described in the quantum level, it predicts the graviton. However, there are some problems with this theory(not in the scientific sense, it’d be more of a hypothesis), I’ll just name one, because it can get very long explaining this. The main problem you could say is that the string theory and superstring theory predicts (or requires there to be) that there is 6 other dimensions, or 10 total dimensions of our universe. I’ll stop here because it’s getting long 😂

@ow7398

Ай бұрын

@@AstronomyAdmirer ok but what are the experimental tests which confirm it is actually true and not just a mathematical model?

@rami-succar7356

Ай бұрын

​@@ow7398it's called string THEORY it's a THEORY, a POTENTIAL EXPLANATION. it's there to fill a gap, which it does, while opening the door to other questions. it's always been this way in all science. i don't see where the problem is.

@ow7398

Ай бұрын

@@rami-succar7356 "A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that can be (or a fortiori, that has been) repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results."

Why am I hearing around the traps that string theory represents the old guard who is holding science back.

@youtubesucks1885

6 күн бұрын

Ye some people think that the universe cares for their feelings.

@Mmoll1990

5 күн бұрын

"around the traps?" What does this mean?

A real Genius that can explain clearly . It was a pleasure to hear this.

I would LOVE to hear a full on science convo about many topics btwn Michio Kaku and Neil DeGrasse Tyson 🤧✨

@Farsider3955

7 күн бұрын

Yes! Great idea. Let Eric Weinstein be the moderator, pose questions, etc. It would be fascinating.

@CornellD.Cavendish

7 күн бұрын

Neil would be exposed

@yonidellarocha9714

6 күн бұрын

​@@Farsider3955I see what you did there, well played...

The answer to the question was supposed to be "probably yes - there are people who know of people who can explain string theory so even the guy asking the question would understand it" Michio Kaku hasn't answered that question at all 😮

Thank you. and Thank you. In 10 seconds you have clarified 10 years of wondering.

Professor Kaku's class is phenomenal. If you pay attention to his lectures, you will pass his Exams and will be super good with most of what his course material has to offer. His lectures always inspire so many students.

String theory is an untested hypothesis. More and more physicists are abandoning the idea as a wild goose chase. It's just a super complicated set of mathematical calculations that involves more than 11 dimensions. Michio Kaku (the man I love and respect) is always super excited about these untested ideas that border on science fiction rather than reality. So no. We won't see vibrating strings. Thanks

@user-ih3xi7iv9k

7 ай бұрын

the math isn't worthless, they are educated calculations offering worthwhile information that these patterns exist at the subatomic level. You won't ever see a string because you can't see in the 4th dimension. I recommend you read 'Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions'. I think you might find the argument interesting and enjoy the story. Best

@ebreshea

7 ай бұрын

@@user-ih3xi7iv9k if we can never observe it that means the hypothesis IS untestable and therefore a dead-end scientifically. And despite it being a proposed "theory of everything" that could reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity, it really seems like that's never going to happen.

@user-ih3xi7iv9k

7 ай бұрын

@@ebreshea "seeing is believing" said the Blind Man.

@ebreshea

7 ай бұрын

@@user-ih3xi7iv9k if you believe in something despite zero evidence that isn't science, it's faith.

@komolkovathana8568

6 ай бұрын

He just said (in his theory (of everything?) That everything is just A DANCE of ENERGY, at different levels & patterns. That's variety of strings to say in short. But i think String is open-end vibrating ENERGY, not material particles (electron existence is limitation/boundary) which are LOOPS of many kinds.. another book (?) to be written.??

I like the way he presents hypothyses and interpretations as unquestionable facts.

@Bergerac82

4 күн бұрын

Pretty common amongst string theorists.

This man practically raised me. I miss when science and history channels weren't all conspiracy theories

Someone who can explain something very complex in simple terms is someone who truly understands what they are saying. Absolutely brilliant.

I always like seeing Michio Kaku! 💜

@SabinFigaro

9 ай бұрын

Yes, I agree. It's been a while for me...time to go on a physics tangent/rabbit hole now...

Many people calling him legend even without knowg string thing which wasted 40 50 years of scientist

@wolfvash22

5 күн бұрын

There is no such thing as wasted hypothesis in science, either you discover something or discover a way to not getting something new, then you have gotten some new knowledge, just not the expected one.

@spockers

5 күн бұрын

I know string thing.

@riccardozanoni2531

3 күн бұрын

@@spockers as foretold

Just adore him. I love all things science. He breaks it down so well. He's another reason I love science.

This is what common people need complex problems explained in a simple manner.

I thought string theory was pretty much a dead end at this point...

@gmanley146

16 күн бұрын

This

@juanfranciscobrizuela

16 күн бұрын

It is

@paulwalked5810

13 күн бұрын

Why?

@BeatlesFan1975

7 күн бұрын

​@@paulwalked5810it cannot be tested

@thepotatoman9069

7 күн бұрын

​@@paulwalked5810I'm assuming because it only ever remained a theory and we have no way to know for sure if it's real.

I'm a simple man. I see Dr Kaku, I hit "like"

Michio is a certified genius. He built his own nuclear reactor in his basement when he was 10. But String Theory is about as legit as Flat Earth Theory.

I crochet things, and often think that I am using string theory 😂

I have never known this man’s name and I have seen this man everywhere. I am so glad to finally learn his name. He is awesome!

He needs a labcoat. A drinking habbit, and a grandson named morty.

@Maxtherocketguy

16 күн бұрын

interstellar?

@sileudies

8 күн бұрын

@@Maxtherocketguy lmfao

@vanitas.

4 күн бұрын

And a fantasy world in which everything that he hopes to be real can be. But seriously, this guy is like a bottomless barrel of misinformation, not a IRL Rick Sanchez

Honestly thank you for that. You dumbed it down for non geniuses like me. And you were able to do it in a minute. Thank you so much

Being able to explain this kind of concepts like this is one of the toughest jobs in science

This guy is a absolute living legend !

@marcnairn8355

4 ай бұрын

Was, he's been too deep down the lunatic quack consciousness rabbit hole for years now, nobody respects his current takes in the community

I thought string theory was very speculative ?

@kiraPh1234k

7 күн бұрын

It is thus far, entirely speculative.

@youtubesucks1885

6 күн бұрын

As every theory of quantum gravity is speculative so is string theory xD

@linuxp00

6 күн бұрын

It is, but seem so happy talking about it, that people just let them tinker with their toy models

@AlexDeLarge1

6 күн бұрын

Not really. We know string theory fits our current model.

@IronOgre

6 күн бұрын

​@@AlexDeLarge1Well the argument is that it doesn't fit our current model except where we've adapted theory to fit. String theory has produced nothing, none of the experiments that SHOULD prove its predictions have done so

This scientist is my childhood, loved watching show about mysteries of space with him and his colleagues

As a Chemist , I find his explanation quite fascinating makes me see Chemistry in a different light especially all aspects that relates to electrons which is a lot 🥰

That’s mind blowing

What if i zoom in on the rubber band

@o.o9709

9 ай бұрын

Then it'd never give you up or let you down

Michio, you are GREAT at explaining the COMPLEX in a SIMPLE way. I especially appreciated you sharing years ago, that we exist within a GINORMOUS Galaxy, Universe and beyond; hence, it’s extremely arrogant to believe that we’re the only ones in town. I’ve had many earthly and otherworldly, vivid dreams of numerous realities-within parallel and alternate universes-as early as the late nineties, for a week in 2001, and mostly within the past 13 years. And this included being within different worlds, seeing MANY different extraterrestrials, and even interacting with dozens.

I always enjoy his lectures.

wow, the most useful minute of my life. I want someone to explain all physics this way.

These superminds who can explain a subject in simple terms should be filmed & their "lessons" should be used in Schools. Some people are gifted & can explain the most complex subjects simply

@user-fq2tp3zr4j

Ай бұрын

String theory is not even real. If you want to understand the unreal topic, go watch some standup comedy.

It’s important to remember that this is just a theory it hasn’t actually been proven yet

@tsad5611

6 ай бұрын

Not even that

@AnarexicSumo

14 күн бұрын

Theory in science is the highest level of veracity an idea can achieve. It doesn't mean unproven -- it means the opposite

@CorbiniteVids

11 күн бұрын

@@AnarexicSumo and that's why string theory isn't really a theory. It doesn't provide any "if you do this then you should get that" predictions, it's just a bunch of ideas floating in the air with no attachment to what we can actually do with them or what observations we can make. It's not taken seriously by other physicists

@kiraPh1234k

7 күн бұрын

It's not just a theory, if it were then it would be amazing. It's just a hypothesis.

Seeing how old he got 😔 he was a legend when I was a kid.

this is how you know he truly knows what he’s talking about

Thanks Michio Kaku for explaining string theory in layman's terms, just plain English. This is very helpful!

The strings only exist in their dreams

What an educator, pure excellence

How they came up with the conclusion that it's a rubber band blows my mind

Thanks...

He is not a pseudoscientist. The difference between a scientist and a pseudoscientist is in how they apply the science method. A fringe theory is still a scientific theory if it follows the scientific method, which he does.

@ferretyluv

9 ай бұрын

Who said string theory is pseudoscience? It’s not. It’s just a fringe theory that’s become less and less accepted over time.

@FryMonkey23

9 ай бұрын

The scientific method usually relies on evidence, something which string theory lacks

@Mike-dz2ye

9 ай бұрын

Not if it's The Science. See Dr. Fauci

@ak-tz7xh

8 ай бұрын

what?? who even thinks he's a pseudoscientist?

@gamezswinger

7 ай бұрын

Physicist and Nobel Prize laureate Roger Penrose says we need to abandon string theory. He disagrees with Kaku. String theory is based on fantasy and hocus pocus.

Dr Kaku is by far the best at explaining physics to a layperson. Brilliant mind, but down to Earth.

Have been a big fan of Michio Kaku for more than a decade now, ever since I saw him in documentary series how the universe works

Sooo alchemy was possible all along?

Hasn’t string theory lost favor?

@juliamay8580

9 ай бұрын

I think so, but we don't have a proven grand unification theory to take its place either, so depending who you ask, you might hear it's not entirely off the table yet. Who knows, maybe it's not viable in its current form but tomorrow they might discover something or reformulate it in such a way that gains traction again. Idk, I just hope they find the answer in my lifetime x'd

This man is a treasure that we must protect at all costs.

It takes intelligence to know this stuff, but it takes even more to know how to teach it to people of all levels of intelligence

He’s explaining this as if it’s a proven fact

@rickdeckard9810

9 ай бұрын

How do you know it's not.

@DarthGTB

9 ай бұрын

​@@rickdeckard9810 string theory is theoretical physics. It's mathematically sound but it hasn't been proven experimentally. Don't expect this being taught in school instead of traditional particle physics for the next decades

@hairymcnipples

9 ай бұрын

​@@rickdeckard9810I mean even if it's a hundred percent accurate it is absolutely not proven fact.

Hats off legend

LOVE this man. He makes the science of life and our world easy to understand, instead of wrapping it all in as much complexity as possible to make himself seem greater, as most do. He's blessed, and we are blessed through him. 😊

This feels like the opposite of Feynman who would start with "What confusion does the theory resolve and what novel testable predictions does it make?"

My favorite physicist, him and Tyson.

30+ years and no testable hypotheses for String theory. That's a science fail.

@retired5218

9 ай бұрын

So far...

I've heard of string theory since fifth grade (over ten years ago) and never thought that it was as simple as this. Wow this is completely new to me and it's breaking my brain a bit

This is a man who enjoys what he does, I wish I could be at least the person he seems to be, someone who really enjoys what they do every day.

This guy and his long buried string theory. Give it a rest. 😂

This over-dressed flea market salesman is saying funny things. Anway, gotta get back to the real science...

@retired5218

9 ай бұрын

Do you have a PhD and teach physics? He's allowed to have a theory. Even some of Einstein's ideas weren't proven until after his death.

@twinkleblink3073

4 күн бұрын

The real science is his dotted tie. 😮

I appreciate this video. It’s one thing to be smart. It’s another thing entirely to be able to effectively explain what you mean to somebody who has little to no knowledge of what you’re talking about. Well done, Mr. Kaku.

I am so glad he cleared that up!

String theory is bunk. No actual physicist thinks it is right anymore.

@retired5218

9 ай бұрын

Even Einstein wasn't proved right about a number of things until after his death. 🤔

@mclark23

9 ай бұрын

Yep

You know someone is a brilliant expert when they can explain in a few minutes really complex concepts in their field of expertise in simple easily understood terms.

Always enjoyed watching him.

You really know someone’s an expert on a topic when they can explain it to anyone and they’ll get it

Just love the Michio Kaku explanations. Is so simple!

I am 40 with an Engg degree and for the first time heard such a description of an electron. I thought it was a point

Hands down the best explanation of string theory that I've ever heard!!

Leave it to Michio to explain physics as if it was like 2+2=4. Love his stuff

I simply ADORE this guy! Neil, Michio among others are my favorite go to everything!!