40:00 Thank you vinay. Over and over again. We can see that the main pandemic is one one of innumeracy of the expert class.
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
1:21:00 exactly. This is solved by better labour laws. We need a labour environment were people are allowed to have opinions and it should be illegal to be fired over opinions stated outside the workplace.
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
why so small attendance?!
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
Please dig deeper into the STATISTICS of spectrum of transmission from 100% fomites to 100% aerosols, it's my understanding from articles that for seasonal respiratory viruses, the difference between the two is not strong.
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
Adding this here for posterity: Online participants: Elizabeth Fama (author), Dr Eric Rasmussen, Randy Wayne (ass.prof, Cornell), David Henderson (Hoover & Fraser Inst.), Terry Gannon (prof Math & Stats, U.Alberta) IRL participants: John? (Hoover Inst. spouse of E.Fama?), Jay B ?,
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
42:00 That's not "not religion", that's the essence of religion!!! Putting your faith in an unproven (proven opposite actually) miracle is religious.
@shu931296 ай бұрын
Dang, it's a shame sound quality is awful
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
18:35 what a strange question! We've long known that Coronavirus immunity is PARTIAL & TRANSIENT (to use Prasad's words). The vaccine induced immunity CAN NOT do better than the naturally encountered immunity. John comes back, with "just make it every three weeks", completely missing the point that it's not just TRANSIENT, it's also PARTIAL, that's the nature of Coronaviruses.
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
1:18:00 Exactly. It's amazing that any scientist still defends daily face diapers, specially ridiculously, on some basis of "individual" benefits. This is patently anti-science.
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
On climate: Anyone who is unable to discuss the Milankovitch Cycles should NOT talk about historical climates or the fake "climate change" which in fact has been CLIMATE STAGNATION for the past 11,000 years. There needs to be some degree of competence to discuss science! This is not to say that non-scientists should have no opinions on these matters, but their positions should be ethical/legal/economics/civil rights, etc.
@tallard6666 ай бұрын
Beth (was that her name) instead of suggesting "masks might work for individuals" (as idiot Fauci said), should have put it in a scientific context. Do STRATIFICATION (as Vinay suggested earlier on)
Пікірлер: 12
40:00 Thank you vinay. Over and over again. We can see that the main pandemic is one one of innumeracy of the expert class.
1:21:00 exactly. This is solved by better labour laws. We need a labour environment were people are allowed to have opinions and it should be illegal to be fired over opinions stated outside the workplace.
why so small attendance?!
Please dig deeper into the STATISTICS of spectrum of transmission from 100% fomites to 100% aerosols, it's my understanding from articles that for seasonal respiratory viruses, the difference between the two is not strong.
Adding this here for posterity: Online participants: Elizabeth Fama (author), Dr Eric Rasmussen, Randy Wayne (ass.prof, Cornell), David Henderson (Hoover & Fraser Inst.), Terry Gannon (prof Math & Stats, U.Alberta) IRL participants: John? (Hoover Inst. spouse of E.Fama?), Jay B ?,
42:00 That's not "not religion", that's the essence of religion!!! Putting your faith in an unproven (proven opposite actually) miracle is religious.
Dang, it's a shame sound quality is awful
18:35 what a strange question! We've long known that Coronavirus immunity is PARTIAL & TRANSIENT (to use Prasad's words). The vaccine induced immunity CAN NOT do better than the naturally encountered immunity. John comes back, with "just make it every three weeks", completely missing the point that it's not just TRANSIENT, it's also PARTIAL, that's the nature of Coronaviruses.
1:18:00 Exactly. It's amazing that any scientist still defends daily face diapers, specially ridiculously, on some basis of "individual" benefits. This is patently anti-science.
On climate: Anyone who is unable to discuss the Milankovitch Cycles should NOT talk about historical climates or the fake "climate change" which in fact has been CLIMATE STAGNATION for the past 11,000 years. There needs to be some degree of competence to discuss science! This is not to say that non-scientists should have no opinions on these matters, but their positions should be ethical/legal/economics/civil rights, etc.
Beth (was that her name) instead of suggesting "masks might work for individuals" (as idiot Fauci said), should have put it in a scientific context. Do STRATIFICATION (as Vinay suggested earlier on)