Roger Federer's play style, his serve action, his attacking tennis , his smooth movements 😭 How many are missing the maestro ❤ GOAT 🐐

@helloworld2054

4 ай бұрын

Until he faced the real 🐐 and choked

@lailatondini8916

4 ай бұрын

😊

@thegreatercornholio8393

4 ай бұрын

@@helloworld2054 Federer had Djokovic on the ropes like rolled roast on kitchen string - just because he didn't beat him doesn't mean he wasn't his equal.

@markuszgraggen4831

4 ай бұрын

@@helloworld2054 I would say Fed just met another goat. Both are great but finally Djokovic was too much in Federer’s head.

@NamTran-xc2ip

4 ай бұрын

@@thegreatercornholio8393not in this match

Federer was a death match-up for Wawrinka. Even when Stan was at his peak he never found a way to beat Roger off clay...

17-0 against Wonka on hardcourt is bananas

@NamTran-xc2ip

3 ай бұрын

Should have lost to ruin his 'Nole slam'

Спасибо за прекрасную трансляцию!😀🙌

I miss RF, The GOAT in my book. FedEx Forever 🎾🐐💚

@initialise21

4 ай бұрын

Keep coping buddy

Roger Federer He always played stylishly, always aggressively at times, always forward. 😊😮

if federer had lost this match, Novak would have lost another final to stan lol

@oscardiaz9170

4 ай бұрын

Stan would have lost... Djokovic beat Stan at AO2015

@dowakinsanguedidrago9374

3 ай бұрын

​@@oscardiaz9170 but not in the final. In 2015 Stan Wavrinka defeated Novak Djokovic in the Roland Garros final in four sets.

@kenanderkroate

2 ай бұрын

​@@dowakinsanguedidrago9374 You never know maybe djokovic would have beaten Stan in straight sets you never know

Not really a rivalry among countrymen. Roger seemed to always have Stan's number.

@kenanderkroate

2 ай бұрын

Not always Monte Carlo Final 2014❤

SABR !!

Roger was brilliant whole tournament until Novak

@viksinha5410

4 ай бұрын

He wasn’t bad in the final; Djokovic was just better

@Divvy21

4 ай бұрын

@@viksinha5410 4/23 definitely suggests he could’ve been better. I think if he didn’t give up the old racket, his forehand would’ve been a lot better in his later years. It was kind of a necessary change unfortunately as that frame was considered old. But I do agree, that he still was playing well in the final though it could’ve been better.

@samy29987

4 ай бұрын

​@@Divvy21 Yes, he could have been better, but he was playing extremely well that day. Generating 23 break point chances means you played well enough to win. The sets were very tight, so if a couple of those breaks go Rogers way, who knows what would have happened. Djokovic wasn't that much better that Federer that day despite winning in 4 sets.

@Mike-sj1jv

3 ай бұрын

​@viksinha5410 he is too vulnerable to djokovic should've lost to Wawrinka

@edkiely2712

3 ай бұрын

Roger wasn't "bad" but, like many of his lost GS matches against Novak, he didn't play particularly well on the big points, especially the numerous break-chances. Novak always seemed to hv the ability to keep Roger uneasy and never quite able to dictate points like he wanted. I thought that, had Roger played like he did against Wawrinka in the semis, he was going to win the tournament. But, he didn't and, Novak had a lot to do with that!

Omad

It’s funny because djokovic beat him soundly in the final but if djokovic played wawrinka then it could have gone either way.

Nadal or djokovic would never be able to beat this roger who was in his prime

this day Roger had dinner booked for 20:00 😅

Wawrinka should have thought not to wear the watch while playing, even you are not use that hand but the sweet and the stiffness would hold you down man,You should look at Nadal and Federer never wore anythings except hand band

I've always hated this commentator.

Stylistic matchups aside, stan definitely has a mental block against federer😂. Even when federer hits a normal rally shot by their standards stan just rockets an error while he wouldnt against other players

@andreim.5324

4 ай бұрын

I believe that's because Federer's an attacking player who imposes the rhythm of play, especially on a faster surface, where he can take the ball early and cut a lot from Wawrinka's reaction time. It also explains why Wawrinka's only 3 wins against him, all came on clay. Stan does not do well with players that do not give him a rhythm. That is why he plays well against someone like Djokovic, because Djokovic stays in the rallies with him and this allows Wawrinka to be the one who is attacking and dictating play, a think he could not do against Federer or even Nadal. Against attacking players, he becomes impatient, tries to go for the quick winner and that results in many errors, because he is not comfortable being in that position.

@markuszgraggen4831

4 ай бұрын

@@andreim.5324 True!

@HughCunte

3 ай бұрын

Let the excuses begin super!

"

Novak Djokovic is the GOAT

@thegreatercornholio8393

4 ай бұрын

"Matt Damon"

@NickZoOoR

4 ай бұрын

And my mum is Pete Sampras

Why are showing a lot of Federer’s matches? He’s retired . Give the new guys more media exposure!

@andreim.5324

4 ай бұрын

Because Federer is the most loved tennis player in history and people want to see his old matches in their entirety and in a great quality. The new guys have more than enough media exposure at this point.

@rm1507

4 ай бұрын

Nobody cares about the mid gen of Medvedev Zverev and Tsitsipas blud

@danielpayne7194

4 ай бұрын

The new guys are not in the same league.

@ryoshusuke2108

4 ай бұрын

The new guys are trash 😂

@oscardiaz9170

4 ай бұрын

Because Federer is third