Stakeholder Theory: Utilitarianism applied to Businesses/Organizations 1:02, 8:55 Identify (1) Options/Decisions and (2) Whom it Effects 2:10 Consider consequences for everyone (all stakeholders) 6:30 Corporations and Non-Profits. Who is effected? 9:30 Externalities (unintended/unpredicted consequences.) Positive and Negative 15:25 23:17 We need to know Costs and Benefits 25:00 Understand Behaviors, Values, Contexts: _The Mission Statement_ 28:24 Procedures/Rules. _Methods of The Mission_
@mileskeller52442 жыл бұрын
I watch after another of your lectures professor. Thank you so much for recording them.
@KaizThePoet7 ай бұрын
From UK London, Anglia Ruskin university, this was so helpful thanks 🎉 great teacher here.
@Human_Evolution-5 жыл бұрын
Great videos. Can you make one on underdetermination?
@diagoal Жыл бұрын
It‘s not utilitarianism applied but pragmatism vitalized in business conduct!
@BilieGoat3 жыл бұрын
You got it wrong in the first 60 sec. A stakeholder is not simply someone affected by an action. In the sense that we are all beholden to the other and Kumbaya, sure, but this is not firm economic theory other than within a Socialist narrative. A stakeholder is someone who has possessed something and exchanged it for a claim on something else. Stakeholding is not passive and there are risks involved. Not some generic amorphous risk but specifically the risk that you may have been better off staking your claim elsewhere. Whether you are an investor, employee, CEO, manager, customer, sovereign entity or resident - you may find yourself affected by many different actions or you may not like some result but you are never simply a passive stakeholder... you are simply affected.
@PhiloofAlexandria
3 жыл бұрын
That’s not how Freeman uses the term.
@rasmustuejrgensen6853
2 жыл бұрын
Sounds more like a sort of shareholder.
@MrPramanirahul
Жыл бұрын
Please read the second sentence and then the last sentence that you have written.
Пікірлер: 11
Stakeholder Theory: Utilitarianism applied to Businesses/Organizations 1:02, 8:55 Identify (1) Options/Decisions and (2) Whom it Effects 2:10 Consider consequences for everyone (all stakeholders) 6:30 Corporations and Non-Profits. Who is effected? 9:30 Externalities (unintended/unpredicted consequences.) Positive and Negative 15:25 23:17 We need to know Costs and Benefits 25:00 Understand Behaviors, Values, Contexts: _The Mission Statement_ 28:24 Procedures/Rules. _Methods of The Mission_
I watch after another of your lectures professor. Thank you so much for recording them.
From UK London, Anglia Ruskin university, this was so helpful thanks 🎉 great teacher here.
Great videos. Can you make one on underdetermination?
It‘s not utilitarianism applied but pragmatism vitalized in business conduct!
You got it wrong in the first 60 sec. A stakeholder is not simply someone affected by an action. In the sense that we are all beholden to the other and Kumbaya, sure, but this is not firm economic theory other than within a Socialist narrative. A stakeholder is someone who has possessed something and exchanged it for a claim on something else. Stakeholding is not passive and there are risks involved. Not some generic amorphous risk but specifically the risk that you may have been better off staking your claim elsewhere. Whether you are an investor, employee, CEO, manager, customer, sovereign entity or resident - you may find yourself affected by many different actions or you may not like some result but you are never simply a passive stakeholder... you are simply affected.
@PhiloofAlexandria
3 жыл бұрын
That’s not how Freeman uses the term.
@rasmustuejrgensen6853
2 жыл бұрын
Sounds more like a sort of shareholder.
@MrPramanirahul
Жыл бұрын
Please read the second sentence and then the last sentence that you have written.