Translation: The RBMK reactor can finish the 10 year plan of energy production in 10 milliseconds.

"Operating experience has shown that 1,000 megawatts, for these reactors, is not the limit."

@deano023

3 жыл бұрын

how about +30,000MW? lol

@-_deploy_-

3 жыл бұрын

@@deano023 nooooooo *BOOOOM*

@Johann52005

3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha that's ironic

@Thesupermachine2000

3 жыл бұрын

@@Johann52005 I would say it is uranic. Sorry bout that...

@rajendraverrill

3 жыл бұрын

7:13

16:45 The Loviisa Nuclear Power Plant is still in operation in 2020, with the 2 Soviet-built reactors. Together they produce about 8 terawatt hours of electricity per year, which is roughly 10% of Finland's annual electricity production. The reactors are licensed to operate until 2027 and 2030, and will probably continue to work even beyond that.

@fuckumaddafakka8529

3 жыл бұрын

Can it even be decomissioned without replacement reactors? Finland is already depending on import of electricity, right?

@gregorymalchuk272

3 жыл бұрын

I assume the individual pressure tubes are easy to change out, so you don't have to deal with neutron embrittlement which is actually the driver behind the lifespan limits of PWRs and BWRs with their giant steel casting/forging reactor cores. Actually, I believe the Russians have recently developed a technique of annealing the reactor vessel to relieve the neutron embrittlement and extend the operating life of PWRs and BWRs.

@ericliu5491

2 жыл бұрын

The USSR should have put more emphasis on the VVER and BN series, not the RBMK.

@thecommentingt34

2 жыл бұрын

I can swear it will go boom some day,like Chernobyl

@spacewolfjr

Ай бұрын

The Loviisa NPP is being converted to being able to run on Elk-meat meatballs.

"The safety of soviet nuclear power plants fully meet international requirements"

@DuffkaBigNerd

Жыл бұрын

That aged well.

@the_roccardo7642

2 ай бұрын

It's funny, because if I recall correctly, most of, if not all RBMK reactors didn't have any containment, and for some reason all VVER reactors had

На основе действующего рабочего проекта РБМК были попытки создать канальные реакторы типа РБМКП-2400 и РБМКП-4800 с прямоугольной конфигурацией активной зоны (габариты: 7×7×27 метров) и более интенсивным перегревом пара (до 600 °С). P.S. Оптимистическая картина интенсивного развития атомной энергетики была очень сильно подорвана и заторможена Чернобыльской аварией...

@FadeToEvil

3 жыл бұрын

And, nevertheless, Russia is continuing idea of closed power-nuclear-cycle creating fast neutroune reactors... Because this is the future, because this can supply mankind with energy for several centuries. This can won some time on improving nuclear fusion reactors.

@akosatov

3 жыл бұрын

Так и есть

@wilhelmkreuz7637

2 ай бұрын

И это очень обидно. Отказ многих стран от АЭС не оправдан.

Thanks for this documentary. You are the best! I will not promise, but if I have time, I will translate it into Serbian. Well I believe you can put in subtitles in addition to English and Polish. Ask me, it should be translated into every language, because the documentary is phenomenal!

@ForgottenChornobyl

4 жыл бұрын

That would be fantastic! I can send you subtitles with timestamps in a text file if you like, just message me on facebook. facebook.com/ForgottenChernobyl

@nocniportir

4 жыл бұрын

@@ForgottenChornobyl ive send you a message..

Obrigado pelo documentário e pela tradução para português. Thanksfor the documentary and for the translation to portuguese.

The background instrumental is soothing, i wonder if there are any source of the soundtrack

@deletdis6173

8 ай бұрын

Ikr I literally fell asleep to this like it was narrated by a Soviet Bob Ross!

Awesome video, thank you.

Outro dia eu vi um documentario da construcao do rbmk 1000 ,achei lindo a dedicacao dos tecnicos do trabalhadores ,é incrivel o funcionamento e a engenharia por tras do projeto

VVER is a decent design. Should have stuck to that one instead of "getting smart" with the RBMK.

@beet3870

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, i agree. At least that is what they are doing now (VVER-1200)

@cytrynowy_melon6604

3 жыл бұрын

@Hunter Paulauskas wasn't ok obviously.

@alexanderivkin7086

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, but VVER are very expensive. RBMK were also used for creating weapon plutonium, this is why hey were built to operate without shut down the reactor. Today the RBMK reactors are used to create medical elements like Cobalt-60.

@TheTrueMichael

2 жыл бұрын

Bruh the RBMK came first... Technically speaking. Because the first ever soviet commercial plant was an AMB, and the RBMK came shortly after.

@mattaddison1910

2 жыл бұрын

RBMK was cheaper and very powerful. There would have been nothing wrong with the RBMK had the ministry in charge of nuclear power and the designers of the reactor implemented critical safety improvements for issues which they knew about way in advance of what happened in Chernobyl. Prior to 1986 disaster, there have been incidents with RBMK reactors at other plants, such as Leningrad NPP, which were basically foreshadowing of what could happen. Sadly, the state classified those incidents at once, and that meant information was not spread to other operators in time to prevent them from making the same errors. The USSR had their warning signs, they had plenty of time to fix critical flaws such as the control rod water displacer gap issue, slow acting scram motors and no rods triggered to insert from bottom during EPS-5. All of these would have made a Chernobyl situation impossible. Despite that, they took no action, not believing that anything beyond a maximum design basis incident could ever occur. Dead wrong.

T hanks for this, it was a beautiful dream.

Watching this has a big fever dream vibe to it. It's interesting, though. I see this is a 1986 copyright, but was it before or after 'the event?'

@georgH

3 жыл бұрын

I was wondering the same...

@snorlax4021

3 жыл бұрын

Seriously? You watched the video? It's pretty clear at what point this documentary was made imo.

@fuckumaddafakka8529

3 жыл бұрын

Chernobyl got memory-holed in the making of this film. Wonder why? ;)

3:30 I love how the narration tries to gaslight people to believe the oil resources are running out 😂

Where did you obtain this film before uploading it to yt? How did you find it?

@ergenekon4l

4 ай бұрын

С KZread-канала Тимура Гаранина

where can I find the BGM?

Safety systems of Soviet nuclear power plants fully meet international requirements. 😁 LOL

@beet3870

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@beet3870

2 жыл бұрын

The VVER did. But the rbmk... nope

@nerissacrawford8017

2 жыл бұрын

🤣 OMG

@caav56

2 жыл бұрын

@@beet3870 Kinda shame MKER never got a chance. Core simplicity of RBMK, but with actual containment and better controls this time.

@beet3870

2 жыл бұрын

@@caav56 yep i agree

Was this filmed/released before or after the disaster?

@ForgottenChornobyl

Жыл бұрын

My guess is before, but there was no exact date provided anywhere.

Gostei muito, com tradução em Português. Uma pena que vários dados informados são extremamente equivocados hahahah

Fox Moulder at 5:29

can i translate this film to my language (Bahasa Indonesia)?

@ForgottenChornobyl

2 жыл бұрын

That would be great! Can you message me through my facebook page (fb.com/ForgottenChernobyl) please? This way I can send you a text wile with all subtitles and timestamps.

Tja, so viel Optimismus. Und dann Tschernobyl!!

This film aged like milk within a matter of monts...

RMBK Reactor's Doesn't explode

@youtubefanbot6997

3 жыл бұрын

Nope in Soviet russia Power plant exploads ypu

@TempoImpetuoso

3 жыл бұрын

@Timothy Simpson you are delusional

@redbaron9029

3 жыл бұрын

It doesn't if operated within its normal limitations like the ones still being used in Russia. You seems like a victim bent on seeing only the imaginative negativity of the western propaganda.

@youtubefanbot6997

3 жыл бұрын

@@redbaron9029 i think ur in the wrong comment section

@trifio5242

3 жыл бұрын

@@redbaron9029 all RBMK reactors have been refirbished after the accident lol :) If it "doesn't explode" then why have they done that?))

Эх какая страна была... и всё прос...ли 😒

@lexasolopow

3 жыл бұрын

Сам в а___е...

omg

5:45 RBMK reaktor

@ruslankammisarov5475

2 жыл бұрын

Reactor high power kanalniy(rbmk)reactor water-water energetic(wwer),,rbmk-1000,wwer-1000-1000 megawatt

@ruslankammisarov5475

2 жыл бұрын

Reactor rbmk worked slowly neutron,reactor bn-600-high speed neutron

@ruslankammisarov5475

2 жыл бұрын

RBMK-leningradskaya,kurskaya,smolenskaya,ignolinskaya,chernobilskaya NPP

Vnimanie, vnimanie

@fuckumaddafakka8529

2 жыл бұрын

🚨☢🚨☢🚨

Otimo documentario ,porem é lastimavel o acidente com o rbmk 1000 que eu acho particularmente uma jóia da engenharia Russa

@viniciussurkamp6633

3 жыл бұрын

Não dá pra negar que o projeto do RBMK tinha uma ótima vc relação custo-benefício, porém algumas modificações eram necessárias para evitar o desastre de 1986. Modificações essas que só foram implementadas depois do acontecido.

กูมาจากอนาคต

Today on Things Which Aged Like Milk.

Booom

@redbaron9029

3 жыл бұрын

........and there goes the three mile island reactor.!

english subtitles are wrong: the water-water reactor type is shortened to WWER - not VVER ... but even english documentaries get it wrong calling a WWER reactor a VVER one ... is it really that hard to get it right?

@ForgottenChornobyl

3 жыл бұрын

Both acronyms are considered correct however in English W makes a different sound than Russian W (B in cyrillic). Russian W sounds more like V (as in Volume) and you pronounce the reactor type as vodo-vodyanoi energeticheski reaktor. That's why I decided to use V in the Russian video. The VVER annotation is even used officially by Rosatom, I think people who designed those reactors get it right after all. ;) rosatom.ru/en/rosatom-group/engineering-and-construction/modern-reactors-of-russian-design/

@cryptearth

3 жыл бұрын

@@ForgottenChornobyl very much thank you for that explanation I wasn't aware that vver is also considered "valid" - as someone from germany, where w and v are as similar as in russian (btw: I had russian as my 2nd language - and although I forgot quite a lot over the past decade (simply as I didn't had someone to speak it with) I still know the basics and still can read the cyrillic alphabet (it's like riding a bycicle - once learned it's a skill for the rest of you life) - hence I'm aware about that there is no "v" in russian) I always thought using "v" in languages in which water is spelled with a "w" to an error well deserved respect for that reply - +like +rep #You'reImpressive

@ForgottenChornobyl

3 жыл бұрын

@@cryptearth I will keep it in mind when I find someone willing to translate it to German, but I think most Germans speak English anyway so you can still watch those clips?

@cryptearth

3 жыл бұрын

@@ForgottenChornobyl I can only speak for my generation (90s): the time I was in school english was the first foreign language in any type or form of school - which, at least to my knowledge, is still true today - so, anyone born from 90 on does get some years of english in school - as for anyone older: depends on which part of germany you lived while you was in school: in east germany there only was german and russian - end of story - but in west germany it gets a bit more complicated: as west germany was split between the brits, the us and the french depend in which sector you lived you could have learned either british english, american english, or french - so, for anyone born before 90 there's a majority of people never learned english at all

@phorzer32

3 жыл бұрын

German transcription is WWER

144p

Nuke power is SO awesome, just look at what Fukishima is doing to the Pacific. . .

@beet3870

3 жыл бұрын

And how air pollution from coal and oil kills 7 million people a year!

@Squilliam-Fancyson

Жыл бұрын

I've heard the Pacific consists of quite some water and can handle this minor pollution with only slightly radioactive tritium like a champ. Sellafield and La Hague pump about double the amount of tritium everyday into the English Channel.

@zabdas83

Жыл бұрын

@@Squilliam-Fancyson what you smoking Joe ... Crac ?

@Squilliam-Fancyson

Жыл бұрын

@@zabdas83 wish I could get my hands onto some high grade coke, but Im not joking. The reprocessing of burnt fuel elements produces a lot of weak radioactive water, with mostly short living isotopes. This water get's dumped into the sea via pipeline(which is not illegal). Otherwise all nuclear reprocessing plants would need huge tanks on shore(for rad. water storage) which would be much more problematic to keep safe.

@zabdas83

Жыл бұрын

@@Squilliam-Fancyson Fukushima is different though, we're talking about a reactor meltdown/explosion/failure, therfore the 'spill' going into the Pacific is much worse?

nice video, but nothing about chernobyl. Very good proaganda for 1986

@ForgottenChornobyl

3 жыл бұрын

I believe the film was released before the accident, but I couldn't find the exact date anywhere. Or the propaganda just ignored it, as usual. Pozdrawiam! :)

@Fil0girl

3 жыл бұрын

@@ForgottenChornobyl yeah, they probably were still stuck on 3.6 roentgens. The Soviets were, after all, forced to admit the accident happened

where can I find the BGM?