Which other territorial disputes should I talk about?

@samuelrueda6105

3 жыл бұрын

Peru Colombian War due to territorial dispute

@osterreich-ungarie6168

3 жыл бұрын

Malvinas argentinas

@MrCameroncee

3 жыл бұрын

Doing the continents one by one sounded like a good idea

@diegogalvan1110

3 жыл бұрын

Nicaragua claims San Andrés and Providencia Island. And although the court said the island were Colombian, Colombia lost a lot of maritime territory

@alexanderzagula1994

3 жыл бұрын

Oceania, that should be interesting

Fun fact: Bolivia still keeps its navy cuz they believe they will take the coast again

@gabrielcaldura8782

3 жыл бұрын

True

@scotandiamapping4549

3 жыл бұрын

You'll do it one day Bolivia. You'll do it one day

@galerinha

3 жыл бұрын

Actually it's because navy also operates in the rivers. Paraguay have a navy too

@matheuspinho4987

3 жыл бұрын

Brazil and france are in the same continent lol

@galerinha

3 жыл бұрын

@@Dougulas322 brazil and paraguay also had a naval battle in the war of the triple alliance and it was on a river (battle of the riachuelo).

Brazil: I feel like I don't need this, I just want it...

@henriquem.9763

3 жыл бұрын

Most of those territories nobody needs and nobody lives there.

@i05CrafterGames

3 жыл бұрын

Brasil representando kkkkjjj

@luis_gil

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly lol

@superflag8982

3 жыл бұрын

@@i05CrafterGames ó o cara com a foto da confederação do equador

@alfrredd

3 жыл бұрын

Also Brazil is so huge, it's like: who cares about the litte island, or a small creek, just give it to the smaller country, you have enough territory yourself, leave some for the rest.

6:55 "The US refused to intervene" well there is someting you don't hear very often

@edmundthespiffing2920

3 жыл бұрын

As someone living in the Middle East it felt weird

@thedripkingofangmar6778

3 жыл бұрын

At the time they had no hope against the UK, which was also supported by other powers like Germany and Italy

@Cjnw

3 жыл бұрын

Oil has left the chat

@utopia4056

3 жыл бұрын

Rwanda

@thebandit0256

3 жыл бұрын

Because we aren't a Apc yet

France: "So, we need someone else to resolve this dispute..." Netherlands: "Yes, someone who wouldn't favor one over another..." Russia: "Umm, I hate you both equally, sooo..."

@DistantFungus20

3 жыл бұрын

France and Russia were pretty good friends at the time. This was right before they created an alliance due to their mutual enemies in Germany and Austria

@Smirnaffskiy

3 жыл бұрын

@@DistantFungus20 I know, I am Russian and I know my history. I said that just for a joke :)

@apeman9238

3 жыл бұрын

@@Smirnaffskiy czar alexander 3 said that the region belonged to Suriname

@tesnacloud

3 жыл бұрын

If they were going for maximum hate, they should have asked the British and Spanish, who despised France and the Netherlands passionately.😈

@ewoudalliet1734

3 жыл бұрын

@@tesnacloud Yeah, those two also despised eachother passionately and would probably start a war themselves... And if they didn't it would be in the interest of the Netherlands as both the Spanish and British would've had more to gain from a weak France. It's not just about sentiments, but also about strategy.

As a Brazilian I must say. The border disputes that we have with are neighbors are nothing serious at all. Both islands are uninhabited and have 0 resources. And towns are built between Uruguay and Brazil all the time and no one cares anyway. You can basically walk freely between Uruguay and Brazil.

@SamuelChac0n

3 жыл бұрын

Are you from rio grande do sul? Eu sou uruguaio mais moro na fronteira

@francogiobbimontesanti3826

3 жыл бұрын

Calígula Nope São Paulo. But I go a lot to Rio Grande do Sul

@daniy1426

3 жыл бұрын

@@SamuelChac0n Tu escreves muito bem em Português,parabéns

@SamuelChac0n

3 жыл бұрын

@@daniy1426 obrigado mano

@biscoito1r

3 жыл бұрын

@@SamuelChac0n No such thing as Uruguay. That is the occupied territory of Cisplatina. One day we shall drive the Castilians back to their land just like our ancestors did with the moors. Many of you will die but this is sacrifice I'm willing to make.

Outside of South America Chile, Argentina and the UK also have a dispute over a ton of Antarctica ignoring the Antarctic Treaty.

@daniel_rossy_explica

3 жыл бұрын

wait until 2040. That year will be fun.

@felipeoyarzun5424

3 жыл бұрын

Shit is gonna go down in that zone around 2040, holy hell

@Cjnw

3 жыл бұрын

The land claims as of 1959 are "grandfathered;" so, even disputed claims are valid!

@pecadodeorgullo5963

3 жыл бұрын

The UK will probably get its slice since it has the power to enforce its claim, Chile will probably get a deal with the UK and Argentina will get nothing.

@victornoel36

3 жыл бұрын

@@felipeoyarzun5424 What will happen in 2040?

Bolivia:GiB sEa CHILE:HOW ABOUT A NO

@Cjnw

3 жыл бұрын

nOrMiE

@wattsnottaken1

3 жыл бұрын

Joshua Mcdonald “Dr. Evil, can I paint his yoo-hoo gold?” “How bout NO!”

@diegoontour

3 жыл бұрын

But Bolivia has sea, is in the south of Ilo, Perú.

Britain and France are my favouite South American countries.

@Bananaman-hk6qw

3 жыл бұрын

*sad Dutch noises*

@artur24able

3 жыл бұрын

@Deinis de Sousa I love how Turks proclaim themselves to be Europeans, how delusional can they get? Even better, there are people who say with full confidence that Turkey is European, while at the same time saying that Russia is Asian country, just because they have a lot of land in Asia. Or when maps of Europe has Turkey but not Eastern Europe past Poland.

@polako7370

3 жыл бұрын

@@artur24able well multicontinetal countries are a thing, for example chile is a tricontinental country because it owns islands in oceania an has self proclaimed sovernty over part of the antartic so you could say that russia and turkey are bicontinal countries

@artur24able

3 жыл бұрын

@@polako7370 Not the same thing, Russia is European country that expanded into Asia, while Turkey or Ottomans, expanded into Europe from Asia.

@polako7370

3 жыл бұрын

@@artur24able same with chile, the islands in oceania are polonesian culture, you probably know of rapa nui, they don even consider themself chileans but chile has international recognition over them so tricontinental, i dont really get your point, russia covers to continents so why not bicontinetnal also their culture takes somthing for each continent, the same with turkey they are occidentaliced, i feel a lot of hate in you thougts thoug

Suriname and Venezuela, both claiming a chunk of Guyana: 🤝

@jwenpaddy123

3 жыл бұрын

😭 right Though Suriname doesn't actively pursue thier claim of our territory unlike Venezuela

@MrLrebelo1

3 жыл бұрын

Why are you everywhere

@elfelix8843

3 жыл бұрын

You are everywhere alongside the regular guy with a mustache

@jwenpaddy123

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrLrebelo1 lol You saw my comment on the other video

@MarceMarcus

3 жыл бұрын

Avery the Cuban-American is in every comment section. You can’t change my mind.

Not even the Peru-Ecuador border? There’s entire wars over it

@BichinAround

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed there was a war. But all is over now

@jaimexcas

3 жыл бұрын

Perhaps it is cause there is no dispute anymore?

@alfrredd

3 жыл бұрын

there is no dispute today. Literally every south american country had border disputes after Independence.

@josehuaman6603

3 жыл бұрын

The last war was in 1995 and they signed a peace agreement in 1998. After that there wasn't any dispute between Perú and Ecuador, and both countries have very good relations since then.

@anthonysebastian362

3 жыл бұрын

The dispute is over

Uruguayan here! Greatly explained (some things about our independence are slightly wrong tho). Here, nobody cares about those disputes because we get on really well with Brazil, so those two uninhabited regions are not drifting us apart. For the record, Brazil does most of the maintenance of Masoller. I'm not saying it should be theirs, but they seem way more interested than us hahaha

@gustavodeoliveira5254

3 жыл бұрын

I'm brazilian, and I didn't know about that territory dispute hahah I wouldn't mind if Uruguay actually gained the dispute, neither would I if Brazil did. Anyway, despite our history of occupation, greetings from a neighbor and hermano

@JuanbianchibOP

3 жыл бұрын

@@gustavodeoliveira5254 yeah, I see how disputes in other countries can get super intense, and when I tell foreigners that Uruguay has a dispute they are like "omg so you guys are at war!?!". It seems like here in South America, border disputes are mostly meaningless... Nothing can ruin our friendship anyways, irmão 🇧🇷🇺🇾

@gustavodeoliveira5254

3 жыл бұрын

@@JuanbianchibOP exactly, most of them is just for convinience, like resolving who's the owner of some island. I love our continent, we are very united and friends with one another

@JuanbianchibOP

3 жыл бұрын

@@gustavodeoliveira5254 poor as fuck but happy, hahaha

@Bronze_Age_Sea_Person

3 жыл бұрын

Our disputes we resolve on the field in the Libertadores da América.

Ecuador and Peru had one of the longest territorial disputes in history. Basically starting after independence with Gran Colombia and ended in 1941 with the treaty of Rio

@dragonbook2198

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think the dispute has ended. Ecuador claims that the treaty of Rio is invalid as Ecuador signed it under duress.

@cranmzvg

3 жыл бұрын

Technically ended in 1998 with the Brasilia Presidential Act, which ratify the Treaty of Rio

@tomasdebievre6991

3 жыл бұрын

@@dragonbook2198 it ended in 1995 with the cenepa war

@velcranoxofficials9970

3 жыл бұрын

I think it was important to mention it on this video since ecuador literally got half of its land annexed by peru

@tomasdebievre6991

3 жыл бұрын

@@velcranoxofficials9970 yes and as an ecuadorian i was kind of impressed that it wasn't included, but I guess that it was because the disputes ended long ago

Chile's border disputes: 1) Bolivia's coastline, which has been part of Chile for about 2 centuries now so probably isn't going to change any time soon. 2) Some ice.

@nicholaskelly6375

3 жыл бұрын

Since 1879 and the War of The Pacific.

@randomguy-tg7ok

3 жыл бұрын

Huh. Looks like I have my South American history quite severely wrong then.

@nicholaskelly6375

3 жыл бұрын

@@randomguy-tg7ok Bolivia does still have a Navy up on Lake Tititcaca and on a number of rivers in the Amazon basin. Also even though Bolivia is landlocked a new series of dams and locks on the Rio Maderia and Rio Mamore means that sea going ships can now reach Bolivia!

@AfrikaKorp42

3 жыл бұрын

Practically every South American country disputes Chile's existance.

@felipeoyarzun5424

3 жыл бұрын

200 years, 130 years, doesn't matter, its a long-ass time anyway and it's dispute is closed by both countries and an international court, so it's quite settled. Plus Bolivia is maybe the weakest country when it comes to militar power in South America, after maybe those 3 small countries to the north of Brazil

I'm from Suriname... And It's all The Netherlands' fault. We don't lay our claims as strongly as we did before, although it's still taught to be our land in school. And plus, we have astronomically good relations with Guyana and French Guiana (France) despite the border disputes.

@octaviosander8898

3 жыл бұрын

Wow you're from Suriname, I've never saw someone from there even living in Brazil, would you mind talking a little bit?

@b.r.9180

3 жыл бұрын

@@octaviosander8898 Of course! No problem

@jamadir

3 жыл бұрын

​@@b.r.9180 Spreek je ook nederlands?

@b.r.9180

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamadir Ja, natuurlijk. Alleen zijn er kleine verschillen bij sommige woorden.

@jamadir

3 жыл бұрын

@@b.r.9180 Is dat jouw moedertaal of spreek je iets anders thuis?

Malouines itself comes from the port town of St Malo in France, and St Malo was established by a Welshman called Maclou, who later was Sainted, so both names are of British origin.

To add to what's said in the video: "Îles Malouines" (aka Malvinas aka Falklands) were given this name by Bougainville to honor the city of Saint Malo, in Brittany. That city is famous for having been the home port of the "corsaires" (sort of king-licensed pirates) and also of many sailors from the discoveries era.

In the 70's there was actually a near resolution to the Chile/Bolivia conflict. Both countries had military dictators at the time, and there were talks between both governments to grant Bolivia a small strip of coast near the Chile/Peru border (a la DR Congo), but the Peruvians objected to it and it failed. :(

@Bronze_Age_Sea_Person

3 жыл бұрын

If this was made on Chile's territory, why did the Peruvian government think they had any saying on the matter?

@a2falcone

3 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't call it a near "resolution", though, since the dispute was resolved with the 1904 Peace Treaty. Everything afterwards has been a long tradition of Bolivian governments supporting irredentism as a way to distract Bolivians from their own domestic problems. And they have been so vocal, that even though there's no actual territorial dispute to be solved, Chile has been open to negotiations a couple times.

@ab9840

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bronze_Age_Sea_Person - In the 1883 treaty between Chile and Peru, it was agreed that Chile would need to get the approval of Peru if they wanted to cede former Peruvian territory to any other nation. Some think they added that clause in order to spite Bolivia. Read - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Ancón

Will you make one of these for Oceania? There are a few little curiosities, rather than disputes. The Norfolk Island issue is quite interesting, they were essentially their own country and descendants from the Bounty mutineers (they were moved to the island from Pitcairn). During the 2008 economic crisis, they asked to join Australia, which they did. However, they hate having to pay tax (they didn't before) to access Australian government services like healthcare and welfare. Now New Zealand is also looking at its sea boundaries because of the Zealandia microcontinent, which could result in re-drawing of boundaries with Australia, although the prospect of war breaking out between Aus and NZ for territory is zero. Plus Australia has a billion micro-nations as our constitution states that anyone with any royal blood can declare their own country, and basically every Anglo-Saxon can trace their heritage back to a king at some point, so Australia is full of people claiming their own house is a seperate country.

@cspresimir

3 жыл бұрын

Wasn't Norfolk a prison island in the XIX century? under Australia's (or maybe UK's direct) control?

In relation to Chile and Bolivia in 1879 I have to make some corrections: - Bolivia had access to the sea well before 1866, it's just that due to the fact that the border between Chile and Bolivia had never been clearly defined before AND due to the discovery of guano deposits defining a border became an important matter. I should also add that in 1843 Chilean Pres. Manuel Bulnes declared the 23rd Southern parallel as being the northern most border of Chile. Bolivia protested against that and several negotiations were attempted, hence the treaties of 1866 and 1874. - Chilean troops landed in Antofagasta on the 14th of February 1879 and Bolivia declared war first in March 1879. It was during that interval, in march/beginning of April that negotiations were attempted; Chile was not officially at war against Bolivia and Peru until the 5th of April 1879. Peru and Bolivia were Allied, being bound by a secret defensive treaty. MY SOURCES: -- Farcau, Bruce W., The Ten Cents War. Chile, Peru and Bolivia in the War of the Pacific, 1879- 1884, Praeger, 2000 -- Dennis, William Jefferson (ed.), Documentary History of the Tacna-Arica Dispute, Kennikat Press, 1971 -- -Sater, William F., Andean Tragedy. Fighting the War of the Pacific, 1879-1884, Lincoln/London, University of Nebraska Press, 2007

@semi-retrowiki8001

3 жыл бұрын

@Capitalist Insurrection Chile es decir.... aunque las únicos documentos históricos hablaban del paralelo 21°27' sólo porque se le dio la gana al presidente en 1843 decidió que era en el 23°...... ¿y le llamas ilegal a quienes tenían la soberanía de acuerdo a todas las fuentes históricas? No pues si a Argentina se le hubiera ocurrido en 1850 que su frontera era el oceano pacífico y sacaba una ley diciendo eso pues te podrían decir que la existencia de Chile es ilegal, así de lógico suena lo que dices.

Hello Guyanese here😊 about the dispute between Guyana and suriname is not that serious anymore and I think everyone forget about it. Guyana and suriname are very close now unlike Venezuela and Guyana🙄. So uhmm if I could remember correctly, the previous Guyana government didn't want to start a war but this new one is different. But I hope in the future, Guyana and Venezuela can have a good relationship.

Îles Malouines : malouine stands for from Saint-Malo (a French city).

@General.Knowledge

3 жыл бұрын

Cool!

@EdMcF1

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, and St. Malo is Breton, and the Bretons are Cornish who fled the Anglo-Saxons, so via St. Malo (being of Bretons i.e. Britons) we can all see that however you slice it, the Falklands are British.

@nestorvilla3605

3 жыл бұрын

@@EdMcF1 : the Malvinas Islands are Argentine, because we inherited them from Spanish conquistadors and colonizers 🇦🇷

@jetaddicted

3 жыл бұрын

So you reject the conquistadores but not when it suits you

@nestorvilla3605

3 жыл бұрын

@@jetaddicted : I didn't reject the Spanish conquistadors, they bring our beautiful language, catholic religion, and too many traditions and culture, America was almost empty when Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors come!!

So the whole South America is a territorial dispute itself Like the Balkans

@karma9898

3 жыл бұрын

With more land and people

@Koulstart

3 жыл бұрын

And less advanced

@Arauto_Kagnos

3 жыл бұрын

@@Koulstart no.

@Koulstart

3 жыл бұрын

@@Arauto_Kagnos yes

@Arauto_Kagnos

3 жыл бұрын

@@Koulstart no.

Oceania territorial disputes: smoking is bad you shouldn’t do it South American territorial disputes: I like smoking but with moderation North American territorial disputes: ohh that’s some good dank kush European territorial disputes: C O C A I N E

@HolyRomanEmpire962-1806

3 жыл бұрын

Antartica Territorial disputes: You are drinking the water of the cooler of Chernobyl with a little bit of uranium and tungsten

@cspresimir

3 жыл бұрын

@@HolyRomanEmpire962-1806 A zest of polonium would be in order too. :)

9:57 It is not Masoller. This place is called Rincão de Artigas(or Rincón de Artigas) and it's not claimed by Brazil, it's brazilian territory claimed by Uruguay. Masoller is a village near Rincão de Artigas.

@henriquem.9763

3 жыл бұрын

And Brazil doesn't claim Masoller.

@hitlers_grandson

3 жыл бұрын

@@henriquem.9763 adn the border dispute ended years ago congrats on fooling yourself

@General.Knowledge

3 жыл бұрын

You're right!

@weslleyavelino867

3 жыл бұрын

Que pertence ao Brasil! É incontestável e o Uruguai não tem direito a nada.

@Danilium

3 жыл бұрын

@@weslleyavelino867 até 1973 vocés nao tinham direito a nada. Entao estabeleceram una cidade artificial invadindo a área, e devido al suporte de seus militares nossa ditadura nao fez nada. Territorios ilegais seguem sendo ilegais e nao dao direito segundo dotrina internacional.

No one: Chile: L Ö N G

@tinycervid7679

3 жыл бұрын

We are very long yes, we could be longer...

@the_jester-

3 жыл бұрын

south american longboi

@g_g1241

3 жыл бұрын

Chile took the name chile too serious

@alfonsomango_suyu

3 жыл бұрын

@@g_g1241 there's a lot of chilly willy penguins

@g_g1241

3 жыл бұрын

@@alfonsomango_suyu Well yeah but, do you have axolotls?

Brazil is so small,we want more

@shawnv123

3 жыл бұрын

no you don’t

Great lesson! Always learning with you ☺️

I still remember when they taught us in school that we owned Guyana Essequiba. It was until my teen years that i realized that they lied and Guyana was actually an Independent country , which was mindblowing at the time

@kinkaju

3 жыл бұрын

No, sera que entendias mal. A mi siempre me la enseñaron como "'zona de reclamación". Guyana es un país si, pero del esequibo a la izquierda.

@abrahambastidas2136

3 жыл бұрын

@@kinkaju No, en esa escuela estaban empeñados en que guayana era parte de Venezuela. Dado que los maestros no eran los mejores no me sorprende hoy en dia, pero a un niño le puedes decir lo que sea y se lo cree

Do you know about the Beagle Conflict? It was between Chile and Argentina and almost endend in a war. That conflict was the main reason for chile to spy on Argentina during the Falklands War

@a2falcone

3 жыл бұрын

@Default Profile Picture I've never heard of that. As far as I know, Chilean support was limited to providing British officers access to a Chilean military air radar in Punta Arenas. Which is a small thing, but some argue was a decisive factor in winning the war, as having the carrier air groups providing 24/7 air cover was impossible. With the Chilean radar, the British knew when Argentine planes took off, so the carrier air groups could take off only when they were needed. The British task force sailed from Britain, and their bombers operated from Ascension Island in the Atlantic, so free passage and fuel doesn't sound like something Chile could provide.

@facundogimenez7529

3 жыл бұрын

Biased comment here

@cspresimir

3 жыл бұрын

LNM conflict ...

@EdMcF1

3 жыл бұрын

@@a2falcone The radar was supplied by the UK, Chile got to keep it after the war. RAF Nimrods and perhaps Canberras (in Chilean markings) were operating from Chile over the South Atlantic. Read about Wing Cdr Sidney Edwards' time in Santiago during the war, he was the 'fixer' with the FACh.

@EdMcF1

3 жыл бұрын

@Default Profile Picture El Reino Unido ayudó a Chile por destruir mucha de la FAA y parte de su armada. La guerra acabó con una Argentina pacífica, últimamente una cosa buena para ambos países.

Oh man I've been waiting this video for so long

Territorial disputes in Asia please

@SadmanNahim

3 жыл бұрын

Every south asian countries have some disputes.

@lesleylee3755

3 жыл бұрын

You are gonna kill him....

@J4R0D

3 жыл бұрын

China: it's free real estate

I like how you describe each event without taking part. As an Argentine I appreciate it.

@Merovingiocba

3 жыл бұрын

Using the words invasion and occupation of Argentina, is to choose a part. Because we Argentines call it recovery. In addition to the fact that he did not speak of the Treaty of Friendship and Trade between Argentina and the UK in which the British government did not make any claim on the islands governed by Buenos Aires, and of the Political and Military Command and the Argentine government and people that the British expelled in 1833, among them the first person to be born in the islands, Argentine daughter of Governor Vernet. And not to mention that the islanders do not have the right of self-determination recognized by the UN, as they are British settlers.

@leandrotami

3 жыл бұрын

@@Merovingiocba they are British, what do you expect them to do? go and pick a fight somewhere else.

@Merovingiocba

2 жыл бұрын

@@leandrotami the nationality of you or someone who go to another country do not are the same that the land. You dont have self determination.

@bernadmanny

2 жыл бұрын

@@Merovingiocba Legal claims aside it's soon to be 200 years under British control at some point Argentina may have to accept its long distance relationship ended some time ago.

@peterfireflylund

9 ай бұрын

@@bernadmannya relationship that never even existed. Argentina is the ultimate stalker.

Paraguay has been involved with a couple of doozies of border disputes...the one with Uruguay and Brazil touching off the War of the Triple Alliance (South America's bloodiest conflict, resulting in the death of half of the population of Paraguay), and the Chaco War with Bolivia, which was the last real war between South American nations to date...the notorious Camino de la Muerte is a relic of that conflict.

@Diegus-

3 жыл бұрын

La guerra por el Cenepa entre Perú y Ecuador fue el último conflicto sudamericano.

0:30 a peruvian here, yes there is no current territorial dispute in which Peru is involved. Regarding land, the last one was settled with Ecuador on 1998 after a military conflict on 1995 over the Cenepa's River Basin. Regarding sea, the last one was settled with Chile on 2014 through diplomacy and a sentence from the International Court of Justice.

Im waiting for Ecuador vs Goat conflict over the Galapagos islands. It caused a total war.

Esse canal tem qts anos ja? Poderia ter um video comemorativo mostrando o dono 😁

@General.Knowledge

3 жыл бұрын

3-4 anos! Talvez se chegar a 1 milhão de subscritores ahah

@luizbomfim2840

3 жыл бұрын

@@General.Knowledge poxa.. ok então =)

@luizbomfim2840

3 жыл бұрын

@@General.Knowledge 12 curtidas so de quem entende portugues. Imagina se eu tivesse escrito em inglês. 😏

This isn't a border dispute or anything but it's kinda related. So when I travelled to Uruguay I visited this place called Chuy, the main avenue of which is in the border with Brazil, effectively splitting the town in half. It was very funny and wacky. If you wanted to buy something in the other side of the street, you nedded to find a place to exchange currencies to do so. I suggest you make a video on these situations.

@gustavodeoliveira5254

3 жыл бұрын

So you have to exchange currencies? When I went to Paraguay, they would accept the brazilian currency very easily, didn't know that in uruguay things wouldn't be so easy haha

@walteraiue5850

3 жыл бұрын

But where are you from?

@alwarado

3 жыл бұрын

@@walteraiue5850 I'm from Spain, I travelled to visit my family

More of these would be great!

I remember hearing that Ecuador was once a much larger country with access to the Amazon rain forest before Peru stole their land. Not sure how true this was but they almost had a war back in the 90s.

@thomaswatson9950

3 жыл бұрын

Yea they had a war in the 40s

@andym.s.5231

3 жыл бұрын

Ecuador was not a larger country, it was part of a larger country. Gran Colombia comprised Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador and Panama. However TLDR big territory horrible geography and poor government communication (due to horrible geography)made Venezuela and Ecuador peace out of Gran Colombia, so Gran Colombia was no more. Apart from that, the only major loss was when daddy Roosevelt decided he wanted a canal. Colombia didn’t want one or _something_ so the US said “fuck isolationism, fuck you Washington” and invaded the territory, ‘liberating’ it and voilà the birth of Panama, which was technically going to happen anyway (probably) because the government wasn’t doing such a swell job administrating Panama _(due to horrible geography)_ so they just made it happen quicker. Unless something else happened that I’m blindly unaware of, it was poor geography, bad luck and nationalism that made Ecuador lose access to the Amazon. At least a significant part, because even today they still have (though limited) parts of the forest in the country.

@General.Knowledge

3 жыл бұрын

Bolivia lost a lot to Chile, Argentina, Paraguay and Brazil as well

@MrRonald2796

3 жыл бұрын

@@General.Knowledge Paraguayan here, Bolivia never had effective control over the Chaco region, they only based their "claim" over old maps. Paraguay won the war, but ended-up giving an small portion towards the north for some reason (which I assume was to grant Bolivia access to the Paraguay River).

@ajelandrotiveri1695

3 жыл бұрын

In our country is taught that there was a war with Peru back in the 40s, but a clear border was not settled, then in the 90s Peru's military invaded the territory and a conflict was started. During this war, the president of Peru, visited the zone and the forces of Peru told us that if something happens to the president, they will bomb out capital, Quito. At the end of the war, there were more Peruvian casualties, but international courts decided that the territory belongs to Peru. Now we kinda hate those guys.

Brazil x Uruguay land dispute, nobody cares. I live 100km from the place

I never understood why big countries like brazil care about some random uninhabited island with 10 trees while they have a massive rainforest within their borders. Like what is the point. Why would you spent energy and time on something like this.

@Bronze_Age_Sea_Person

3 жыл бұрын

Dude, we don't care actually. I'm pretty sure 99,999% of Brazilians wouldn't mind if Uruguay and Bolivia took those islands, since they have no inhabitants nor anything interesting there, and we won't fuss over these things. Brazilians don't want to go on a war with no one in this world, not even with the shitty dictator of Venezuela. I'm pretty sure we wouldn't even fight against Hitler if they didn't sink our ships back in the 40s.

@haroeneissa790

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bronze_Age_Sea_Person I know there is not going to be a war over some random uninhabited island. It is just strange to me that governments of these countries care so much about basically nothing. Youre blowing things way out of proportion by talking about war. But that was not my point.

@francogiobbimontesanti3826

3 жыл бұрын

Haroen Eissa The border dispute is just a little claim, it’s not like both governments even give a shit. South Americans have like zero hostility with each other’s.

@daniel_rossy_explica

3 жыл бұрын

@@francogiobbimontesanti3826 And yet we can't form an union...

@francogiobbimontesanti3826

3 жыл бұрын

Daniel Rossy I’d form a union with you Bro.

Brazil kept a good chunk of Uruguay’s original territory, at that point called Provincia Cisplatina after it was let be independent.

Please keep these going , they are very interesting and open your eyes to what a troubled area South America is.

All of south America is a huge dispute

Just fyi ‘viscount’ is pronounced ‘vye-count’

@gustavodeoliveira5254

3 жыл бұрын

I've once heard that, in french, the "s" is almost never pronounced, or never at all, it seems like the case haha (forgive me if that's completely wrong)

@adambarringer91

3 жыл бұрын

And Monjes, pronounced mon-hez, not mon jjjezz But now I’m just nitpicking.....

@pipitameruje

3 жыл бұрын

It's his Portguese getting in the way. We say "visconde" and have a similar word to Monjes, "monges", that's pronnounced that way.

@Cjnw

3 жыл бұрын

@@gustavodeoliveira5254 that is why isle is île in French

Thanks for the schooling dude!

I love the fact that my country is relaxing between the territorial disputes

0:34 Between Peru and Ecuador, having both two wars and a small one, but nowadays relations between the two countries are good. The first war was during ww2 (1941) which was seem very bad by the US because both countries were in the allies.

@jonathanlucero6445

3 жыл бұрын

Soy de Ecuador y como chucha sea vamos a recuperar lo nuestro hpt Ahi traduce la huevada

@stopdelfinofobia8866

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonathanlucero6445 Nunca fue de ustedes. Perú antes que Ecuador existiera ya tenía tumbes, jaen y maynas bajo su control.

@jonathanlucero6445

3 жыл бұрын

Y que chch

@ab9840

3 жыл бұрын

Peleando por selvas donde viven pocas personas. Mejor que trabajen juntos como hermanos en vigilar tus costas antes que los cientos de barcos de pesca de la China dejen tu costas vacio de pescado.

Do this for EVERYWHERE! :-) As for USA, do realize that there have been and currently are border disputes between the states. You could do a whole video about just them. An old one was "The Toledo War" between Michigan and Ohio. Another is the Missouri Bootheel. New York State vs New Jersey over the Statue of Liberty.

@General.Knowledge

3 жыл бұрын

This is a great idea!

@MustraOrdo

3 жыл бұрын

CGP Grey already did a video on the NY and NJ Statue of Liberty territorial dispute.

We had many border disputes with Chile but most of them were resolved in the 90s, I was not aware that the "hielos continentales" region was still in dispute, but I guess that as long as both leave it alone there's no reason to do nothing about it. Really, I mean, it makes to sense to struggle for something that no one really even has the intention to use or populate.

@Diegus-

3 жыл бұрын

Ya está resuelto según rumores y no es que se tenga que dejar por dejar. Hay muchísima agua congelada ahí. Según los mismos periodistas (respetables) de Chile ya el asunto está zanjado con un 80% para AR y el resto para los chilenos pero nadie dice nada xq el pueblo chileno explotaría con ese resultado y el gobierno de Chile le pidió discreción a Argentina. El tratado le da la razón a nuestro país mayormente.

Great video as always. Small correction though. Viscount is pronounced with the ‘s’ silent.

Love the video, I just wish it didn't make it out to be Chile immediately declaring war and steamrolling Bolivia out of the coast. Chile occupied one port on the border to stop Bolivia from auctioning off properties they seized from the chileans they exiled. This lead to a brief period of negotiations that ended when Bolivia declared war first and peru was obligated to join them due to a secret military alliance. At the time the allied countries were expected to win the war due to having a larger combined force, however this force was inexperienced and mismanaged while the Chilean forces were more experienced and competently managed. I don't mind people supporting Bolivia's claim to the coast, I just wish they'd acknowledge Bolivia started the war

The hard thing for an outsider to figure is why the Portuguese part of South America remained a single country on independence, while the Spanish part fractured into a host of often mutually-hostile countries. Why no United States of New Spain?

@allenjenkins7947

3 жыл бұрын

@Conrad Bröeder I was puzzling more about why the Spanish empire broke apart, rather than why the Portuguese one remained intact. As an Australian, it's as if the six British colonies in Australia refused to federate in 1900 and remained six independent and possibly hostile countries.

@gatekeeping8528

3 жыл бұрын

This article answers that same questions, you can translate this with Google, from the BBC: www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-45439574 I'm trying to translate a video about it: 1. Cities in hispanic-america were too far from each other, unlike Brazil, they were closed and were mutually dependent, economically and culturally 2. Brazil didn't have any single university, they had to study in Portugal, in hispanic america there were 23 universities, so, every city developed diverse ideologies. 3. The independence was different, Brazil was a kingdom in the Portuguese empire, they were about to be separated and they fought to keep together, not to be independent, their war lasted two year, meanwhile in hispanic america when Napoleon defeated the king of Spain there was no power over the colonies, so each major city formed temporary governments, one independently from the other, the wars of independence in these countries lasted +20 years. This is the video I translated: kzread.info/dash/bejne/iZxh1MuzedOoY7w.html There's a more detailed video from the latin american BBC: kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWetqsamisLYdps.html

@EdMcF1

3 жыл бұрын

@@allenjenkins7947 Bolivar predicted 'Tyrants will rise from my tomb.', i.e. those who sought power in South America were too power-crazed for an Australian-style federation to emerge, but it looks like in Victoria, things have finally turned out as Bolivar feared for South America.

@nikov82

3 жыл бұрын

There are many reasons. 1. The territories were divided into different vice royalties under the Spanish Empire. The distances from Colombia to say Argentina or Chile are huge, specially in pre-steam powered times. 2. As those territories population evolved, there was mixing between Spanish, criollos, natives and freed slaves.That mix happened differently in each place. 3. The independence wars did happen in a short time period, but not simultaneously. So, when a territory was liberated, another one was under Spanish rule. Also the movement started due to the collapse of the Bourbon dynasty in Spain. While some territories declared outright independence, others claimed they were still loyal to Supreme Central Junta or Cortes. While the Independence national heroes are some in Argentina or Chile, there are others in Venezuela or Colombia. 4. Geographic boundaries. Aside from being a vast territory, the continent's geography doesn't help to connect a single goverment institutions. The Andes are a high wall which slows down human movement. There also are dense jungles, large deserts, wide rivers. The first road to connect the entire continent was finished in the mid 20th century. 5. British intervention. The UK was the hegemon of the period. It didn't fancy having another US sized non-European ruled country to deal with near its colonies (British Guyana, the Caribbean, etc). So they provided funds, weapons and encouragement to each state that wanted to secede from another. 6. Local ruling classes. A large part of South American elites weren't that nationalistic. Once they didn't have to pay taxes to the Spanish, they showed no problems in trading food produce for consumer goods and manufactures with the British and fitting into their schemes for the region.

@richlisola1

7 ай бұрын

Because the Portuguese lands were less settled, the population was centered on the coastal regions, so it was culturally cohesive. rainforests don’t dispute anything-So upon independence Brazil was united culturally which allowed for political unity-Unlike Spanish America. Spanish America gained its freedom by war, Brazil gained its by a slight of hand, a switch of crowns, and a benign treaty with Portugal 🇵🇹 🇧🇷

I like the territorial disputes on the different continents.

12:15 Bolivia doesn't claim the whole are they lost, but they ask for some passage somewhere. There isn't a juridical dispute over a determined area, just a political aspiration.

Venezuela open back the claim on 2/3 of Guyana because Guyana discovered oil there

@MustraOrdo

3 жыл бұрын

Dang, Venezuela ain't that much different from their imperialist rival, the U.S.

@mrbisshie

3 жыл бұрын

I have a feeling the people living in those disputed territories, don't want to become Venezuelan citizens...

@lovelybridge546

3 жыл бұрын

@@mrbisshie because they are not.

@SeongCastle

3 жыл бұрын

​@@lovelybridge546 I have to agree, I'm Venezuelan and the government doesn't care about them nor give them any right as citizens born in Venezuela (as how our constitution consider the territory)

@rafaelrendon8142

3 жыл бұрын

What are you talking about? The dispute has more than 120 years

There is a brazilian island in the middle of the Atlantic calls "Trindade e Martim Vaz", it's the "brazilian falklands": The United Kingdon had tried to stole the island, but Brazil kept the sovereignty and today it's brazilian and belongs to Espírito Santo, a brazilian state.

@pecadodeorgullo5963

3 жыл бұрын

I never knew about that so I guess I learned something new today. I wouldn't say there the Brazilian falklands though since Brazilian sovereignty was recognised by the british. Thanks for this fun fact from Canada.

Awesome channel

This is related to your future videos of dispute. Eastern Malaysia. I do not know if Indonesia has a dispute on Sarawak against Malaysia but I am really sure that my country (Philippines) will revive (probably they are doing it right now) our Dispute on Sabah. A back story. In late 1630's, Sulu Sultanate helped Borneo Sultanate (now Brunei) in a battle (I do not know where in Borneo island it was) and they both won it. Now the Brunei was so happy that someone helped them and gifted Sabah to the Sulu Sultanate. Now when the British Empire occupied Malaysia, the Sulu Sultanate RENTED Sabah (to possibly avoid war). And when Malaysia was liberated in 1963 and the British PASSED the rent responsibility (CEDED according to Malaysia) to them. Now Marcos had a Operation called MERDEKA which is to claim Sabah with force after Macapagal sent some Philippine Tribal Groups to Sabah trying to diplomatically claim Sabah from the British / Malaysia. Now back to MERDEKA. Marcos was about to claim it but a Man sang Marcos' plan towards Malaysia. And it turned out to be Ninoy Aquino. And now the Mainstream Media reported a "Jabidah Massacre" which was a propaganda against Marcos. Now after some time/years that Marcos felt that our country is starting to be unstable, Marcos declared Martial Law to stop the force of Communism because from his early years, there are some attacks by CPP-NPA-NDF forces to the Philippines. Now the Mainstream Media did not expose the real problem but made propagandas to the Marcoses with the last second help of a US-CIA group to bring the Marcos fam to Hawaii instead to Paoay, Ilocos Norte. And when Corazon Aquino took over the palace without and official election, there was the moment that Philippines stopped the claim on Sabah. Now the Duterte Admin is trying to revive it because of the previous history. So in short. The Ninoy Aquino commited treason for helping CPP-NPA-NDF, and Malaysia

The Falkland / Malvinas dispute is poorly described. Teatris between Spanish and England, the effective occupation of Argentina until 1830, the usurpation by force of England, etc. isn´t mentioned. Today the principal argument of the british is the local desire to be part of england (Argentina ignore that argument because they think that is en artificial population, not native). The principal argument of Argentina is the inheritance from Spain and the effective control of the area until british invade it. In your video you don´t mention that Magallanes discovered the islands in 1520 under Spanish flag, that the french established in 1764 but they abandoned in 1769 when they recognized spanish authority, and they mantain it until 1810, when was transferred to the Argentine authority. A very unfair video.

Asia has a LOT. Especially between China and India. Don't forget what happened to Nagorno-Karabakh this year.

How much the total land area of the disputed region on southern patagonian icefield where chile and argentina have disputes?

Please do more like these in different continents!!!!!!!!!!

12:15 NO, NO, NO! Bolivia does NOT claim any sovereignty or legal right over the lost territory. However bitter they may be about losing it, the 1904 Peace Treaty is too solid to be challenged, even by the likes of Evo Morales. What they do have is a political aspiration to gain a sovereign access to the ocean. Since there were inconclusive negotiations on that issue more than once during the 20th century (which involved a corridor next to the Peruvian border, in former Peruvian territory), they claimed in court to have a gained "right to NEGOTIATE a sovereign access to the sea"... which is legal nonsense, as the ICJ ruled. On a side note, Bolivia decreed the expulsion of Chilean citizens the same day it declared war on Chile, so that wasn't a cause of the war. Apart from that mistake, it's a good summary of the direct causes, though.

As a chilean I must say, excellent video. Thank you. First of its kind I see from an aglosaxon. My grandfather founded the "Chilean Institute of the Ice Fields" (Instituto Chileno de Campos de Hielo), and built an outpost in the mountain ice there. Last time he climbed and went there he was more than 80 years old. Nowadays the outpost is used and maintained by the chilean government. His name was Horacio Toro Iturra.

@janitoalevic

3 жыл бұрын

Hay alguna forma de contactarte?

@Vichikuma

3 жыл бұрын

@@janitoalevic A mí?

@Diegus-

3 жыл бұрын

No es anglo. Es portugués. Sobre el area de Hielos Continentales, como lo llamamos nosotros en AR según mismos peridistas de Chile ya está todo cocinado y se supone le corresponde un 80% a AR y el resto a CL pero el gobierno de uds no dice nada xq no sabe que esperar del pueblo en como pueda reaccionar. Pero x el tratado le corresponde eso a mi país según ellos mismos y fuertes rumores de acá también.

@Vichikuma

3 жыл бұрын

@@Diegus- te han mentido tanto

@Diegus-

3 жыл бұрын

@@Vichikuma Claro, claro me mintieron TUS periodistas (respetados aclaro) la verdad te la contó tu papito, que grandes tus fuentes jajaja. Sorry penca, pero el tratado nos da la razón mayormente. Si se te cae un argumento te leo wn.

Cool Please how do you edit your vidoes or what app do you use

I didn't knew about most of these, wish they taught us that in geography class back in school.

@daniel_rossy_explica

3 жыл бұрын

where are you from? here we study the independece of north america, for some weird reason.

@Arauto_Kagnos

3 жыл бұрын

@@daniel_rossy_explica I am Brazilian.

@nachovennedictus6492

3 жыл бұрын

@@daniel_rossy_explica In my school we either studied our country's story or the US story, which for me, never made any sense. That's what made me grow up into rejecting the US. Not that I hate the place, but I just avoid any influence that comes from it and, unlike all my friends, focus on living somewhere else. Still, It's kind of ironic since my girlfriend is from the US...

A video about South America? Impossible

Perú and Chile still have a minimal territorial dispute between the Triángulo Terrestre, a strip of land of around 300m² in the coast of their border. I don't know if it has already been fixed, but none cares about it so it does not matter that much. Yes 300m²,thats why

@gorzux2829

3 жыл бұрын

Oh I see, thanks for the aclaración compadre

TY 😊

1) Falkland / Malvinas Islands 2) The Lawa River Border 3) The New River Triangle Border 4) The Monroe Doctrine Border 5) Monjoes Archipelago Border 6) Masoller Village Border 7) Isla Suárez Border 8) 24th Parallel South Border 9) South Patagonia Border

General: você é português?

Can't wait for Africa man like it's going to be a two hour long Also Bolivia landlocked lawl

@the8thgemmer467

3 жыл бұрын

“Lawl”? You do realise that thousands of people are suffering because of this? Of course, “map nerds” will perpetually view geopolitics as a sports game and a joke.

@KSCoastie

3 жыл бұрын

@@the8thgemmer467 Lawl

@supremeastro5300

3 жыл бұрын

@@the8thgemmer467 Lawl

@footballhighlights7417

3 жыл бұрын

@@the8thgemmer467 Lawl

@felipeoyarzun5424

3 жыл бұрын

@@the8thgemmer467 Lawl

There was another dispute between Chile and Argentina over Tierra del Fuego. I can’t remember if it was the pope or the president of Notre Dame that mediated that one.

@EdMcF1

3 жыл бұрын

Queen Elizabeth II (and a panel she appointed) arbitrated it in 1978, the Argentine Junta rejected it and nearly went to war. The USA told them to stop it or else, and got the then Pope to intervene as a 'peacemaker' to save the Junta's face. The Pope had virtually jack to say when Catholic Argentina was killing non-Catholic British.

How did Alexander Iii of Russia 🇨🇿 get involved in a territorial dispute between the Dutch and the French over a River in South America. But then again, I'm not surprised, between him and Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany, those two always found someway to involve themselves in European affairs when the affairs didn't necessarily have anything to do with them

@ronalddino6370

2 жыл бұрын

Kasier and Czar= Monarchis Hitler vs Stalin= Dictators

@Eurobouy

Жыл бұрын

Why has the flag of Czechia been used when asking about the Tzar of Russia?

@danielleporter1829

Жыл бұрын

@@Eurobouy Must've accidentally hit the Czech flag emoji without realizing it. It may have been next to The Russian flag emoji. I do know the two are different and similar in color.

@Eurobouy

Жыл бұрын

@@danielleporter1829 easily done x

Actually, us, argentinians, also claim the South Georgian Islands

@Captain_Yorkie1

3 жыл бұрын

I will never get them. Even if we went to war again. It will be shorter. Lol

@joshuaosullivan2761

3 жыл бұрын

Why?

@markncl100

3 жыл бұрын

@@joshuaosullivan2761 They claim they inherited it from their former colonial governors, Spain because Pope Alexander VI issued the Papal Bull inter Caetera in 1492, dividing the globe up between Portugal and Spain. It is the same reasoning they use for their claim to Antarctic.

The border dispute beetwen uruguay and brazil on the mainland ended like 2 years ago now its uruguay agreeing everything that is across the uruguay river was uruguay's property but the brazilian island is still disputed so yeah a little correction there

@henriquem.9763

3 жыл бұрын

Can you show me the source of this information?

@hitlers_grandson

3 жыл бұрын

@@henriquem.9763 metrocosm.com/disputed-territories-map.html Interactive Map showing all border disputes as of it you click on uruguay and it doesnt appear just brazilian island appears

@henriquem.9763

3 жыл бұрын

@@hitlers_grandson Interesting, but how accurate is this site? They could have missed it.

@riograndedosulball248

3 жыл бұрын

Ehm Uruguay and Brazil do not have a border *over* the Uruguay river, both are on the same side of it

@hitlers_grandson

3 жыл бұрын

@@henriquem.9763 They update it when news come out because its easy to add one. Basically its just some clicks so yeah expect after 1 day to maximum one week off the new border dispute.

Is there a North American territorial dispute video? Canada has 7 or 8 territorial disputes on it's own, depending upon which source you talk to, although only two of them involve land.

I like your content

There is a dispute between The Netherlands and Venezuela. Venezuela is claiming the ABC island off its coast.

@VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz

3 жыл бұрын

Not True

You forgot the most devastating dispute of all: Who invented pisco?

@sebastianpickett1711

3 жыл бұрын

It’s Chilean and that’s a fact.

@felipeoyarzun5424

3 жыл бұрын

Last update I had, the oldest letter talking about the drink was found near North of Santiago

@loockbreth9114

3 жыл бұрын

Peru

@diegoontour

3 жыл бұрын

Who cares? Is just a drink.

@Diegus-

3 жыл бұрын

El pisco, ceviche y la wea son argentinos, no jodan!

I think Venezuele also argues that Aruba Bonaire and Curacao should be part of their territory, and not part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Pretty sure the locals would not be a fan of becoming part of a failing state though.

I love this video

There is something terribly wrong in the Question of the Falkland Islands: the right of peoples to self-determination is not applicable because the United Kingdom annexed the territory from Argentina by the use of force in 1833 and the relevant United Nations resolutions and the International Court of Justice have already made absolutely clear that colonies that exist due to a gross violation of the principle of territorial integrity are not entitled to an exclusive right to self-determination, the self-determination of the inhabitants of the Falkland Islands is one and the same with that of the Argentine people over the entire Argentine territory including the archipelago, they are limited to participating of the democratic life of the Argentine Republic, but they are not entitled to serve as arbitrators in a territorial dispute of this nature where usurpation is present, that would not only deprive an entire people of its territorial rights, but it would establish dangerous precedents for the mechanism of international law. If you are going to do a video that has this kind of topics, then at least try to make it accurate, please. This case is a manifestation of colonialism and the United Nations has compromised to erradicate that evil from the world. By not explaining the correct functioning of self-determination you are just spreading British propaganda to your audience and thus supporting colonialism.

@Spartan-jg4bf

3 жыл бұрын

Argentina annexed its territory from the natives, so you guy's should maybe go back to Germany, Italy etc...

@Rio-kd6xy

3 жыл бұрын

@@Spartan-jg4bf That's an extremely weak argument that, moreover, has no place in a juridical discussion. Spain gained the territory from conquest, not Argentina. Argentina, as well as every state in Hispanic America, is the result of the efforts of a creole people, this is, a people birthed from European and precolonial American metissage, fighting together against its colonial captor. Saying that Argentina has no right to its territory because it was a Spanish colony is like saying that African, Asian and Oceanian states do not have a right to their territory because they were colonies. The truth is that the only difference between these is that Argentina freed itself from colonialism through might, while African, Asian and Oceanian states freed themselves from colonialism through right, thanks to the decolonization process started by the United Nations. The case of the Falkland Islands is not comparable to that of Argentina. There is a crucial difference between both. Spain gained the territory by colonialism, Argentina regained the territory from Spanish colonialism. On the other hand, British colonialism gained the territory from Argentina, thus, comparing both colonial situations is not comparable in the least, in fact, it is absurd. You also mention German, Italian and other European descendants that live today in Argentina. This is completely irrelevant for international law because the same does not depend on ethnicity, that would certainly be controversial to say the least. However, if that means so much to you, then you need to know that the Argentines that founded Argentina were a creole people, meaning that they were a new people birthed from European and precolonial American metissage, as well as most peoples in Latin America, from Mexico to Chile, the fact that Argentina has more European population is not due to colonialism, but to the massive immigration wave that did not become part of the picture until the first half of the 20th century, an European immigration that was second only to the United States of America. So, again, there is simply no comparison there.

@Captain_Yorkie1

3 жыл бұрын

@@Spartan-jg4bf the original would be the British. Technically the French but they didn't document/claim it.

@Spartan-jg4bf

3 жыл бұрын

@UCWYRYL_E2tLPB7_HeXJs3UQ Simple fact is Argentina was established on land obtained by conquest even after independence from Spain you continued to steal native land in Patagonia, it a country that harboured Nazi war criminals, killed tens of thousands of its own citzens and defaults on its national debts every few years. Maybe you should focus on organising the territories you have already stolen into a successful state, rather than trying to steal more? The bottom line is no British government will ever had the Falklands to Argentina after all the blood and treasure spent on defending them and recapturing them..

@Rio-kd6xy

3 жыл бұрын

@@Captain_Yorkie1 He is not referring to the Falkland Islands themselves, he is referring to the entire Argentine territory, but that's correct. The first civilian population of the Falkland Islands were French, then they left the territory when France ceded its rights to Spain and then the islands were populated by Spanish authorities only. The next civilian population of the islands was the one placed there by Argentina. Half of this population fled due to the American attack of 1831 and the other half was criminally evicted by British authorities or had no other choice but to leave the territory when the British took control of the Falkland Islands that same year in 1833.

Brazil has no border disputes, other countries are the ones that have disputes with us.

@mininudoalem7950

3 жыл бұрын

corretíssimo

@superbeltman6197

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think you know what dispute means

You missed Ecuador and Peru, that fought a series of wars over disputed territory.

I love yo vids

i wonder who is the 3 person that voted to be an indpendent falkland. edit: also imagine if you live in a country which most of the area are just disputed.

@callumblyth3741

3 жыл бұрын

One of them voted for independence

@a2falcone

3 жыл бұрын

Well, they voted against the "Falkland Islands to retain their current political status as an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom". As far as we know, they could've voted to change that status for further integration with the UK.

@christiancanty2036

3 жыл бұрын

Downed argie pilots who are stuck there 😂

Venezuela is claiming more and half of Guyana😪.

@apeman9238

3 жыл бұрын

Everybody here in Suriname knows that tigri belongs to Suriname and the esequibo belongs to guyana

@lovelybridge546

3 жыл бұрын

@@apeman9238is something wrong with your head? Some of my family and relatives live in suriname and they damn well know that Tigri belongs to Guyana. Venezuela can carry their hungry belly skunt. Y'all need to start building houses and city in yall hairy country and leave Guyana alone.

@reggaerasta4285

6 ай бұрын

Because those regions are not of Guyana,it never was!

9:40 Giuseppe west here tanannananna tanananna Garibman ananananan

Excellent work as always 💯Would be nice a northern american one🙏🏻

@googlemexico8759

3 жыл бұрын

There's any disputes, if you count Central America as part of North Amercica there's just one guatemala vs. Belize and Colombia vs. Nicaragua

@Colocho514

3 жыл бұрын

@@googlemexico8759 lol yup there's a few wey

@googlemexico8759

3 жыл бұрын

Ritchie Soto wtf? Which ones... I'm not counting the U.S. ones over the world

This Video and Taureor's hoi4 video where he takes the Falklands as Argentina released on the same day Coincidence, I THINK NOT

@gregoryinsanovic2925

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah,kinda sus

@santiagotorrado8012

3 жыл бұрын

Link?

@Medestros

3 жыл бұрын

@@santiagotorrado8012 kzread.info/dash/bejne/f4GmlMuGpqudh5s.html

Just give Bolivia their coast back smh you don’t need that much coast

Great content! You also have really good portuguese and spanish accents, where are you from? I mostly think you're from Germany or Netherlands 😂. Anyways, greetings from Brazil!

@kaikefernandes6413

3 жыл бұрын

He is portuguese

Venezuela has a historic dispute with Dominica over Bird Island in the Caribbean.

Fun fact: Everything actually belongs to the natives.

@jetaddicted

3 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: the Southern half of French Guyana is the only place where they actually get to rule themselves.

@cuddlemuffin.9545

2 жыл бұрын

Ha! No

Paraguay and Ecuador just chillin (and even if Peru doesn't have a territorial dispute they sided with Chile and also because of them Bolivia lost land so they were kinda involved in the dispute)

The 's' is silent in Viscount. Vycount.

Good vid