⭐️⭐️⭐️ I mis-titled the vlogging shot outside. The first scene was the FX3 & the shot where the Autofocus was hunting all over the place was the Canon R5C ⭐️⭐️⭐️

So basically this was a Sony biased review 😅

I love shooting on the R5C, it has made my life much easier with shutter angle and false colour! It's just Canon's decision on banning 3rd party RF lenses, that alone made me reconsider.

I found that R5C's autofocus is actually very stable once it "tracks". It's just working differently than other mirrorless that you just have to get used to how it works. It took some time for me to figure out tho...You have to switch to tracking mode, and click on the screen which tells the camera to lock the subject. Once the "square" became a "locked square", then it should track the subject pretty well. There are a lot of people that didn't spend their time with this device and didn't know how R5C's AF works and also how it's ISO setting works, saying it's AF is unusable or it's very noisy... well....they missed this beast...it's a work horse if you set it right.

@khay2210

10 ай бұрын

I think the R5C is a beast as well even though the clear winner in this video is the FX3, I just love the canon menu system. Currently using the R5 and it’s more than enough for me now.

@KevinNordstrom

Ай бұрын

Lmao who spends $4,000 on a camera with shitty auto focus

Very helpful, I was thinking of which one to get for my videos and short film 🎥 the choice in pretty clear 👊🏾 thanks again.

At least in the comparison you made Canon's image looks much more cinematic and deeper I don't know, but in my eyes, the image of R5C is much closer to cameras like Alexa and Red Even if it has less dynamic range on paper

@TheEverythingMan

Жыл бұрын

To be honest I spent zero time on the color. I transformed from LOG and left it alone. I normally would have spent more time on the colors

@TJ-po9ol

5 ай бұрын

@@TheEverythingManThat’s the thing though, it’s always a bunch of extra steps between different scenes to get the Sony to look good. I have the FX3 & R5C/C70 and I don’t need to do as much with the Canons to start a real grade vs Sony. FX3 is way more sensitive to WB & exposure.

Since I already have an A7S3, I went with the Sigma FP. Half the price of the Sony, but it’s a true cinema camera. No ibis, and terrible autofocus, but the colors look fantastic. Plus it’s tiny, but it’s not a vlogging camera, but I have plenty of those already.

For the R5C vlogging, you can switch the AF mode to Face Only. Face Priority AF mode will hunt for sure. It'll stick to you just fine if the focusing distance on the lens is sufficient.

@JustWhatINeed83

Жыл бұрын

Yep on the R5C if you are in face only with vlogging, it won't hunt as much and you can adjust the the other responsiveness and speed to get more locked on. I've been using +2 on AF speed and from +1 to +3 on AF response to keep it more locked on (seems a little counterintuitive on AF response) and have the face only toggle on a custom button when I'm doing an interview.

@jasonpbaxter

5 ай бұрын

Can you AF on two faces by chance? Looking to use a single camera on two people for a video podcast.

There’s actually a way to put your own LUT on R5C, but it has spesific requirements and it is baked look you can’t use it as monitoring only

Thank you for a thorough comparison. I’ve been comparing the R5C to the A7IV lately and my conclusions are the same as yours. Image quality wise, they are identical in my opinion. I am actually able to colour match them to the point that they are indistinguishable. The R5C is a great video camera, but not for a KZreadr. It requires its own camera operator. The unreliable autofocus and the lack of Wi-Fi control in video mode are dealbreakers. I’m sticking with the A7IV.

@costinvaly1

Жыл бұрын

The R5C doesn’t have “unreliable” autofocus. You just have to be used to the CinemaOS and know exactly what you’re doing and how to set the AF up. The R5C is not a camera that you just pull out of a bag and start shooting right away. It’s more for the pros who get paid for video gigs, Ads, marketing campaigns and so on. In fact the R5C AF tracks extremely well once you set it up properly.

@DrWasim

Жыл бұрын

@@costinvaly1 I agree. That also means that the R5C requires an operator behind the camera. It’s a filmmaker’s camera, not a KZreadr’s camera. And in that sense - when filming yourself - the AF is not as reliable as in the Sony.

Think a lot of people commented but it took me so long to figure out r5c autofocus but at this point I can set it up to work really well. Still sad that the r5 was just better without tinkering with setting all the time. And in photo mode it works just like the r5

You can tell the R5C sharpness makes the quality look better than the Sony fx3

Sony killed it with the FX3. Curious to see where this future leads. Great video bro!

I got the fx3 even though it's just outside my price range. The 5RC is several hundred dollars out of my range, which made it a pretty easy choice.

I never thought that a lack of EVF would make a significant difference. The ‘flippy screen’ on the FX3 is poorly constructed, easily weakened, floppy and low resolution (making it hard to pull focus). Having an EVF on the FX3 would allow me to pull focus easier, reduce my need for a field monitor (shinobi or ninja) and woud allow me to adjust settings in bright sunlight. Also… do not say, “cageless design” the screw mounts are poorly placed and limited in quantity. You still need a cage. Lastly.. good lord, can someone slap the engineers at Sony for not placing an on/off button on the XLR handle.. for fuk sakes.

What was up with your FX3 autofocus at 3:38? it was all over the place.

@TheEverythingMan

Жыл бұрын

Good find! That was actually the R5C I must have made a mistake with the titles

@ekphotography

Жыл бұрын

@@TheEverythingMan That is what I thought.

@mattgray9297

Жыл бұрын

Great comparison. I use an FX3/A7SIII/a7iv combo and I couldn’t be happier with what Sony has provided in these new bodies.

Great video straight to the points

Am pretty locked into the Sony eco system for my work these days, but Canon do have some very competitive cameras.

Great comparison, Anthony! The Sony FX3 seems to suit your style a lot better. Great camera.

Sony for there win .... 😎 & hey what about the FX30 ...she's a pretty one & nice price too ?

@markshirley01

Жыл бұрын

Here in the UK the difference between a A74 on the grey market and a FX30 mainstream retailer is £90. So until a few months have passed it makes no financial reason to buy a FX30. Im sure the proper gap between the two will happen in the next 5 or 6 months

Btw the reason it was like that for canon is cause canon doesnt have an auto-mode focus where it doesnt automatically know when to switch between focusing on your eyes, your whole face, a full object, you have to go into settings and manually select, eye, face, person, tracking, single point, or so-on-so-forth

No, Sony fanboy, you're not leaving Sony.

Now what’s really crazy for me watching this video obviously late, is the now soon to be released r5 mark2 I know it’s not a cinema but for the price point I’d honestly just go for the fx3 I just love how Sony uses one mount that you are able to use outside lenses. But I love the r5c since I currently own a canon camera. I’ve been a canon guy but everyone I know has went to Sony and gosh I’d prefer buying the trinity line of lenses g master 2 versions and the fx3 but just my opinion I think the fx3 is by far outweighing the r5c

Both great cameras, I was wondering how these two would pair for a and b cameras.

Love the size and the battery life on the Sony. Solid points. But… the Canon R5C has a way nicer image.

@loudandclearmedia

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. He didn't really go into that, but yeah. I have both cameras (the Sony I have in A7Siii form), and while Anthony is absolutely right about the Sony being a reliable workhorse and easier to use, I'll take the image out of R5C 10 out of 10 times. It just looks better, more organic, nicer colors, finer noise grain, less smeary from in camera noise reduction....though I understand that's difficult to convey over KZread.

@khay2210

6 ай бұрын

@@loudandclearmediaI am actually curious about the FX3, basically I would love to know how it a so y camera pairs with a canon for A and B cameras, currently using the r5 that I love so much and really have no complaints about and the 90D, but I would love to replace the 90D with the FX3 as a b Camera, tbh I could go for the r6 or r6ii but I really love the specs of the FX3 and the shape of the camera as well.

Love your accent are you from Jersey or NY originally?

sick review you are the guy thank you

I think this video is a lil bias I own both cameras and Even though I love my FX 3 the R5C I the better camera by far now I don't shoot lowlights even when I do I don't use the FX 3 over all if you're looking to part ways with Sony and just need a primary video Ill recommend the R5C just base of my experience ON A SIDE NOT the first shot look like a canon Shot and the second look like a Sony shot

r5c is more for a serious professional camera, fx3 is more compatible for youtube creator

@TheEverythingMan

9 ай бұрын

lol ok

@hizkiakurniawan

9 ай бұрын

@@TheEverythingMan no I mean like in a good way, since youtube videos doesn’t necessarily need the features r5c has to offer. But for a bigger production like music video or tvc the r5c is better since it supports RAW video recording

@alexeijajkun

2 ай бұрын

@@hizkiakurniawanif you look up the film The Creator the entirety of that film with the exception of some drone shots is filmed on the FX3, it is very much a cinema professional camera being that it can record 16 bit with an external recorder. Making it the cheapest camera that is comparable to a RED

Try the Lumix S1H

FX3 vs Sigma FP

R5c you can burn the lut in btw. I’ve got both and analysis is spot on. Canon just segmented too much. You can tell Sony just builds on each camera and canon wants to make all these different use cases systems. Frustrating

@nycekix

2 ай бұрын

How do u burn the lut in

not gonna lie R5C image looks better

@mbismbismb

Жыл бұрын

For sure... it's Canon anyway

@rMr.big13

Жыл бұрын

Yeh …. That canon color 🤩🤩🤩 Sony doesn’t even come close

@mbismbismb

Жыл бұрын

@@rMr.big13 yeaahhh

@VanDanMedia

8 ай бұрын

As an R5C owner who has used the fx3 before…. Yup the image looks better but it’s a nightmare to use and rig up etc… I can see why the Sony is so popular.. for me.. I keep falling back on the image though.. stunning… imagine better dynamic range though 😅 full frame c70 next 💁🏻‍♂️🙃

The R5c is A Cinema Camera with Photographic capabilities it Doesn’t Have Ibis Like the regular R5

9:30 Spoiler: FX3 wins which I knew before watching this

Great review, canon better step up there game and price 😂

FX3 hands down for me

Welcome to the good life 😅❤😊

I can read and explain better

Fx3

1 word. Lenses. Hope you brought a big ass credit card if you go Canon.

The Sony zv-e10 has better image quality tbh

@TheEverythingMan

Жыл бұрын

Stop it. It’s not even in the same league.

@lewcehjitl3282

Жыл бұрын

@@TheEverythingMan check out Mark Bennetts KZread channel. Can’t tell much difference.

@markshirley01

Жыл бұрын

@@lewcehjitl3282 and then check out on his channel the Nikon z30 that had better 1080 than the ZVE10, so if you need to shoot 60p shoot Nikon 😆👍

@lewcehjitl3282

Жыл бұрын

@@markshirley01 says the Fool.

Skintones and depth are horrible on sony. Canon should have put clog2 in, but its available in RAW (not a massive r5c fan). The C70 destroys the sony cameras aside from Venice on image quality, especially roll off in highlights and shadows. If Canon could make an R5 sizes cine cam that has the C70 image with full frame, then that would be perfect, but they wont.

Sony looks too plastic not very cinematic …. Good for beginners

Yeh man , that’s some bs with canon video autofocus…. Hunts so much

@justicedtson9021

Жыл бұрын

It takes a lot of messing with setting before you realize it is good and very adjustable for different situations. Just annoying because it’s supposed to be auto. The r5 autofocus and the picture mode on r5c work great. And they would apply to 90% of situations. Should just be some “classic mode” or something in the r5c menu. I would leave it there most of the time

depressing vibe, dude

lol this guy is straight biased lol R5c is way more superior camera

@TheEverythingMan

3 ай бұрын

Tell me why it is

@nycekix

2 ай бұрын

He ain't got the answers sway!!!

@mrdamiansingh

2 ай бұрын

8K RAW

@TheEverythingMan

2 ай бұрын

@mrdamiansingh 8k doesn’t make it “way more superior” to me at all. What else you got?

@nycekix

2 ай бұрын

@@mrdamiansingh 8k sucks to edit even on a M3 MacBook pro