Sony 55-210mm vs 18-105mm - Zoom Lens Comparison

Ғылым және технология

Sony 55-210mm vs 18-105mm - WHICH ZOOM LENS TO BUY?
My full reviews for both lenses -
Sony PZ 18-105mm f/4 OSS 'G' Lens Review - • Sony 18-105 F4 Lens Re...
Sony 55-210mm Lens Review - • Sony 55-210mm Telephot...
Amazon links
Sony 18-105mm (US) - amzn.to/2Nyjefk \\
(UK) -amzn.to/2VqXnuA
Sony 55-210mm Telephoto Lens (US) - amzn.to/37MhZBQ \\
(UK) -amzn.to/2thsgHd
In this video we take an in depth look at the SEL18105G E-Mount Lens for Sony Mirrorless APS-C Cameras in comparison to the SEL55210 E Mount Lens.This comparison includes SAMPLE IMAGES and VIDEO to help you make a decision.
My Instagram - / arron.prescott
Sony a5100 subreddit - / a5100
My Twitter- / arronprescott
----------------------------------------------------------
Timestamps -
00:00 - Start
00:45 - 55-210mm Physical Comparison
01:35 - 18-105mm Physical Comparison
03:06 - 55-210mm Specification Overview
06:21 - 18-105mm Specification Overview
07:57 - Image Side by Side Comparisons
10:02 - Conclusions
My Gear (Amazon affiliate links*)-
Sony a5100 (US) - amzn.to/37JNegI(UK) - amzn.to/3aXdN45Sony
a6000 (US) - amzn.to/3aZ1Db1(UK) - amzn.to/2UdT32f
Sony 55-210mm Telephoto Lens (US) - amzn.to/37MhZBQ
(UK) -amzn.to/2thsgHd
Samyang 12mm Wide-Angle lens (US) - amzn.to/2UfjsfS
(UK) - amzn.to/36Fp1H6
My Tripod (US) - amzn.to/36JzCkj
(UK) - amzn.to/2OhNPPb
RAVPower Extra Batteries/ Charger (US) - amzn.to/36E8Z0c
(UK) - amzn.to/390hnJ3
Lowepro Dashpoint 20 case for a5100 (US) - amzn.to/2uN8hR9
(UK)- amzn.to/2Of2muY
Sony icd-px470 Audio Recorder (US) - amzn.to/2vzF5gE
(UK) -amzn.to/2GIRgtO
#Zoom #Lens #Comparison
* DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. There is no additional cost to you.

Пікірлер: 35

  • @ArronPrescott
    @ArronPrescott3 жыл бұрын

    My full reviews for both lenses - Sony PZ 18-105mm f/4 OSS 'G' Lens Review - kzread.info/dash/bejne/dqGj2rR8lZuqncY.html Sony 55-210mm Lens Review - kzread.info/dash/bejne/pXat0amJYd3fnps.html

  • @project-overland
    @project-overland3 жыл бұрын

    Own both lenses. The 55-210 hardly comes off the shelf now but it’s too cheap to sell. The 18-105 is superb for all run and gun shooting and gimbal work. Tend to use primes for planned shoots. Another factor of the 18-105 is the fixed aperture, which is ideal for zooming in video..

  • @RockWILK
    @RockWILK3 жыл бұрын

    cool video. I've been using the 55-210 with my a6400, along with the 16-50, and the 35mm f1.8 OSS for low light situations, and I have to say, all of them are giving me incredible results. For filmmaking, they are all great, and the 55-210 and the kit lens, at least to me, are really underrated and take a beating for no real reason. You can do great work with both. Maybe they don't measure up if you start pixel peeping, or pull out the cards and analyze the corners, or whatever, but for real life filmmaking, you can do pro level work with both, and if you have one more lens, like the 35mm that I have, given the f1.8, you pretty much have every scenario covered. At least in my humble opinion. ;) Thanks for the review, awesome work, and stay well!!

  • @amaan1169

    @amaan1169

    2 жыл бұрын

    i also have the 50mm 1.8 n the 16-35mm kit lens, now I wanna buy a zoom lens. should I buy the 55-210 or spend some extra to buy the 18-135 for that extra sharpness? 🤔 I mean they say the 55-210 is very soft especially at above 185

  • @RockWILK

    @RockWILK

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@amaan1169 I love the 55-210, and I actually think it’s quite sharp. As long as you have enough light, it’s actually very sharp. But you’re at 6.3, so you definitely need enough light. You can get those really cheap, but if you don’t need that kind of rage, I think the 18-105 is really good. I had that lens for a while and I really liked it, but I don’t really like using zoom lenses all that much, so I sold it, and bought a Zeiss batis 25mm F2. Which I really love. It’s a full frame lens, but it’s awesome. Of course, the new Sigma 18-50 F2.8 is supposed to be the sharpest of them all, and really not that expensive, but it also does not have any stabilization. The Tamron 17-70 is an awesome lens, with stabilization, but much more expensive. B&H is running a sale on that lens right now, but it’s still $699. If you are looking for a zoom lens that starts at 55mm, I easily would recommend the 55-210, just make sure you have enough light. I think you’ll love that lens.

  • @TexpatOTG
    @TexpatOTG3 жыл бұрын

    I shoot 16mm and 30mm mostly, but can sure see adding both of those in the future. The 55-210mm is so cheap, I saw one here for $130 that was unopened ... I still would probably by the 18-105mm first. Good show as always. I'm glad to see this comparison.

  • @retrodudefpv
    @retrodudefpv3 жыл бұрын

    I enjoyed this comparison. Just ordered an 18-105. Subbed

  • @nicolasguillaume2264
    @nicolasguillaume22643 жыл бұрын

    I use both. 18-105 95% of time and 55-210 for the extra zoom (wild life mostly). It seems OK for a noob like me. This combo covers most of my needs as I don't do a lot of low light shots

  • @ArronPrescott

    @ArronPrescott

    3 жыл бұрын

    Are you me?! Pretty much exactly how I use these lenses!

  • @fahriyasa1753
    @fahriyasa17533 жыл бұрын

    Great detail bro! i like your comparison, keep it up!

  • @ArronPrescott

    @ArronPrescott

    3 жыл бұрын

    Appreciate it!

  • @DavinciHD_
    @DavinciHD_2 жыл бұрын

    With the aps-c crop factor of the 18-105mm lens being equivalent to 157mm . Would this lens be good enough to film football from the sideline ?

  • @PreparednessVeteran
    @PreparednessVeteran3 жыл бұрын

    For me, my 55-210 is sufficient, particularly at the price. The 18-105 looks like a great lens an you've demonstrated the comparison really well. If I were to go back, I'd probably opt for the 18-105. Good stuff.

  • @ArronPrescott

    @ArronPrescott

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad the 55-210 is working out well for you. It seems to be a lens people seem to like or really dislike! As mentioned in the video I still use mine a lot. The 18-105 is a big decision but I've been very happy with it so far! Thanks for watching!

  • @mrhristv
    @mrhristv3 жыл бұрын

    Great video! thank you

  • @user-kw1pc9ld9i
    @user-kw1pc9ld9i6 ай бұрын

    Sony PZ 18-105mm f/4 OSS 'G была создана прежде всего для съемки видео, для путешествий - в меру универсальна, имеет отличный плавный трансфокатор, пригодна для съемки портретов, пейзажей, архитектуры...Я ее использую для этих целей с 2014 года и не жалею. А для ночной съемки и получения сверхрезких фото использую СИГМА 30\1.4 ДС-ДН...

  • @maqui1814
    @maqui18142 жыл бұрын

    What about Tamron 18-200mm b011?

  • @eveyframes
    @eveyframes Жыл бұрын

    Is it compatible with alpha 7 ii ?

  • @brabbrabmotovlog702
    @brabbrabmotovlog702 Жыл бұрын

    Compatible with sony a3000?

  • @MasiMoreno
    @MasiMoreno Жыл бұрын

    Which of these two lenses do you recommend, bearing in mind that I already have an 16-50???

  • @Sonic-Boom

    @Sonic-Boom

    Жыл бұрын

    The 18-105 now lives on my camera and is excellent. The 16-50 hasn't come out of my camera bag since. I've just bought the 55-210 (got it dirt cheap) for the occasional telephoto shot.

  • @MasiMoreno

    @MasiMoreno

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Sonic-Boom thank you

  • @abhisheksonivlog2526
    @abhisheksonivlog25262 жыл бұрын

    I have a6400...and i want to purchase a zoom lens...nd m cnfusd between both lenses.. please suggest me which lense should I purchase? I love videography mostly

  • @akingbadeomosebi1495

    @akingbadeomosebi1495

    2 жыл бұрын

    I have a 55-210 for sale. It's perfect for video and photography. I've used it for bout 6 months only. It's a great lens. I love it. But I'm just having a tad bit of financial needs to be sorted out. I'm in Punjab.

  • @ifeanyi_maduka
    @ifeanyi_maduka3 жыл бұрын

    The 55-210mm is more of a specialist range and shouldn't be compared to an all round lens like the 18-105mm. There isn't enough difference in quality where the lenses overlap.

  • @mauriincs

    @mauriincs

    3 жыл бұрын

    the 18-135mm has even more definition than both lenses tested in the video. To such an extent that if a 135mm image is cropped to have the same zoom as the 210mm you will achieve the same image quality.

  • @VisitPunjab
    @VisitPunjab3 жыл бұрын

    thank you so much

  • @muctrun9me7768
    @muctrun9me77683 жыл бұрын

    Great , I think this sel is better than this G 18-104 for record video 55-210 for photography

  • @ifeanyi_maduka

    @ifeanyi_maduka

    3 жыл бұрын

    Should actually be the other way round I think. The 55-210 for video, where too much sharpness is actually undesirable. The sharper lens should be used for photography, however.

  • @muctrun9me7768

    @muctrun9me7768

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@ifeanyi_maduka but 18-105 is smoothly zoom and it made by metal, so when you record at 4k the heat from the device can transit to the lens, it give off the heat easily. Moreover, the lighting of F4 is stable in video than F3,5 - 5,6.

  • @luciano_diaz4206
    @luciano_diaz42063 жыл бұрын

    Hello, could you put the subtitles, in English or Spanish to understand what it says, the video is exelete, Thank you very much ..!

  • @putrasembawa1404
    @putrasembawa14048 ай бұрын

    Mantap 👍

  • @rabqazi5397
    @rabqazi53973 жыл бұрын

    I still can’t use my sonya51000 😩

  • @smileofdean

    @smileofdean

    2 жыл бұрын

    why?

  • @BirgerHedman

    @BirgerHedman

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@smileofdean because Sony a51000 don't exist.

Келесі