No video

Sigma 100-400mm f5-6.3 Fujifilm X-mount vs Fujinon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6

The newly announced Sigma 100-400mm f5-6.3 does a lot of things and it does them well. But when it comes to Fujinon and specifically the Fujinon 100-400mm - is it worth the while? And price wise, can you compare them really?
-
My website: www.crisphotography.info
My Instagram: @cris_photo_graphy
@cris_weddings
TikTok: @crisphotograpy
-
Thanks to hooksounds.com for their amazing music!
Check out their website and get 10% discount with this link and code: www.hooksounds.com/ref/estala... and use the code CRIS10

Пікірлер: 53

  • @tuquanvinh
    @tuquanvinh10 ай бұрын

    OS on Sigma is mode, not level. mode 1: for general photography Mode 2 for motor sports and other applications requiring panning.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    10 ай бұрын

    👍🏼

  • @2008wander
    @2008wander11 ай бұрын

    Thanks Cris! Interesting comparison.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    You’re very welcome!

  • @cow77cow
    @cow77cow11 ай бұрын

    Just what I want. Thanks for the video.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    Awesome!

  • @clickmaniac1
    @clickmaniac110 ай бұрын

    I like the small increase in contrast the Sigma has, which makes me prefer it

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    10 ай бұрын

    👍🏼😉

  • @vukhuat4251
    @vukhuat425111 ай бұрын

    No AF comparison between two lenses? I wonder why?

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    Didn’t find it necessary, works fine on both for my shooting style. I don’t use the tracking feature a lot so not a problem for me.

  • @vukhuat4251

    @vukhuat4251

    11 ай бұрын

    @@cris_photography For reviewing purposes I think you should. This lens is obviously for people who shoot wildlife mainly so fast and accurate AF is a fact to consider to buy it.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    @vukhuat4251 i hear ya and makes sense. The AF is as good as the Fuji lens in my tests - I’d even say a tad better (it’s also icy newer). Thanks for pointing that out and take care

  • @subramoniams9850
    @subramoniams98505 ай бұрын

    Thanks for rhe SOOC comparison. In another video Fuji was a bit better while in this Sigma 😮. Having Fuji since 2018 and not parting with it. Still have to say the weight, bulk and price of Sigma is desirable 😊

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    5 ай бұрын

    Thanks a lot for your message and feedback! I understand on wanting to keep Fuji ;)

  • @stevenharper6888
    @stevenharper688810 ай бұрын

    Would a XT30II be too small for these or should I be looking to upgrade the camera ? I was amazed how good the XT30 paired with a 55-250mm can be for wildlife , even heavily crop photos look pretty good so I was thing of getting longer focal length . Great review by the way 👍

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    10 ай бұрын

    Hey there, no I don’t think it’d be too small. The reason being that you attach the actual lens to the tripod so It does matter that much. The sensor is the same so IQ wise same thing. Take care!

  • @subramoniams9850

    @subramoniams9850

    5 ай бұрын

    Even on my XE2, XF100-400 is fine to handhold. Of course it looks weird. The lens collar mount is what I hold

  • @KennyVo120

    @KennyVo120

    4 ай бұрын

    Just get a handgrip and you will feel a lot less awkwardness with bigger lenses! People really are sleeping on the X-Txx series for the form factor, it is genuinely one of the best travel cameras you can get. Next iteration coming this year will include IBIS and 40mp

  • @stanobert3475
    @stanobert34759 ай бұрын

    I sold my Fuji 100-400. It was an expensive, heavy, and obnoxious beast. I use Fuji's much smaller and excellent 70-300 now. If I ever need more reach, I will definitely get the Sigma.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    8 ай бұрын

    I hear ya! The 70-300 is indeed a great and versatile lens. Take care

  • @subramoniams9850

    @subramoniams9850

    5 ай бұрын

    Fuji 1.4X TC has been said to work well with 70-300.

  • @mintte6220
    @mintte62206 ай бұрын

    Bought the Fuji 100-400 2years ago second hand for about 900 bugs. Pretty good Lens so far, but also heavy

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    6 ай бұрын

    Nice!

  • @salarycat
    @salarycat11 ай бұрын

    Hi Cris, would you recommend this or the 70-300 as a telephoto zoom?

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    Hey there, hard to say, really depends on your needs and shooting style. The 70-300 is also an amazing lens so really the question is: do you need a wider lens or to zoom a tad more? Take care

  • @salarycat

    @salarycat

    11 ай бұрын

    Thanks for the reply. I was in the market for a telephoto, so I just ordered the 70-300 a couple of hours before the Sigma was announced! I'm not sure about the hands-on experience of either. I don't have any long lenses now, so I think I'd still prefer the flexibility of the 70-300, but I was wondering what a more experienced person that has hands-on experience thinks about it. @@cris_photography

  • @ryanbeer5262

    @ryanbeer5262

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@salarycatthe 70-300 is smaller & lighter. The difference between 300 & 400 isn't as bigg as it sounds. I'll very likely buy the sigma 1. Because of the tripod collar option 2. I prefer the 400mm fl. I think the 70-300 has a slightly better reproduction ratio only really only matters if you like to do near macro photos.

  • @salarycat

    @salarycat

    11 ай бұрын

    @@ryanbeer5262 right, that’s a good summary. It’s good to know that 300 and 400 aren’t that far. The macro and the size are two main reasons why I’m leaning on the 70-300. If it’s cumbersome to carry I’d often leave it at home, and with 1:2 it’s practically a proper macro lens, like the 60mm is. Also being Fuji ensures longer firmware support, and it’s aps-c optimised.

  • @mac69041
    @mac6904110 ай бұрын

    Can the Fuji tele converter (1.4 & 2x) be used with the Sigma?

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    10 ай бұрын

    Very good question! I haven’t tried with the converter so can’t say sorry

  • @BenjaminTrillington

    @BenjaminTrillington

    23 күн бұрын

    It cannot

  • @gd7062
    @gd706211 ай бұрын

    Compare the Sigma to Tamron 150-500mm. The price point are about the same if lens arc stand included.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    I personally preferred the Sigma for its weight, size and overall specs. Would be an interesting review indeed. Cheers

  • @Carlos-mw5rw
    @Carlos-mw5rw10 ай бұрын

    And how about focus speed?

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    10 ай бұрын

    For regular AF it’s ok, didn’t test tracking so can’t tell you. But overall pretty snappy

  • @andyF1K
    @andyF1K11 ай бұрын

    Perhaps I missed it, does the sigma have an aperture ring? I’ll admit the picture quality looked the same between the lenses, but for me the lack of an aperture ring would be a deal breaker. Tx for the video.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    Hey there, no - no aperture ring on either Fuji nor Sigma, due to the variable aperture at different focal lengths. Cheers

  • @Jordi_RG

    @Jordi_RG

    11 ай бұрын

    @@cris_photography The fuji does have an unmarked aperture ring, as said, due to the variable aperture at different focal lengths. It's the slim ring closest to the lens collar as seen in the video( 2:42 )

  • @awake780

    @awake780

    11 ай бұрын

    @@cris_photographythat is patently false. Jordi is correct.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    Un-marked or not aperture ring is exactly the same thing! I mean - come on. What’s the difference? The movement of your wrist vs your fingers? The point of Andy was if there is a MARKED aperture ring - which is useful but having an unmarked one or none is exactly the same thing!

  • @awake780

    @awake780

    11 ай бұрын

    @@cris_photography no it isn’t. Not having any aperture ring means using the camera body to adjust aperture. If you have an unmarked ring on the lens, then the function is controlled by the lens. This can have a notable impact on some Fuji bodies where you have reduced dial and button controls.

  • @soureel
    @soureel2 ай бұрын

    is the Sigma compatible with the Fujifilm teleconverter?

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    2 ай бұрын

    Not to my knowledge no

  • @BenjaminTrillington

    @BenjaminTrillington

    23 күн бұрын

    It cannot

  • @beegees21
    @beegees216 ай бұрын

    0:35 infographis still says @100 insted @longest end

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    6 ай бұрын

    Ok

  • @samson40a
    @samson40a3 ай бұрын

    In UK May 2024 the Fuji has a Cashback that reduces the price quite a lot.

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    3 ай бұрын

    Good to know!

  • @Zaibacu
    @Zaibacu11 ай бұрын

    Funny how Sigma took their Fullframe lens, modified mount and it still came smaller and lighter than Fuji 😅

  • @cris_photography

    @cris_photography

    11 ай бұрын

    Right? 😉

  • @GungKrisna12

    @GungKrisna12

    9 ай бұрын

    Maybe slightly darker maximum aperture on Sigma lens

  • @beegees21

    @beegees21

    6 ай бұрын

    Do some reading on metal vs plastic density and compare how much the same amount of both weigh. Ther's an aswer to your mistery