I find it deceptive that it wasn't mention in documentary that the part of the shroud taken for the carbon dating was only the portion which was mended after the fire by the nuns. And the investigation that only a certain kind radiation can produce that image on the shroud was also not included in this documentary.

The earliest drawings of Jesus during the 2nd and 3rd century showed him with short, curly hair and cropped beard. He looked like a normal man of that time so much so that Judas had to kiss Him to point Him out to the guards. The long hair and long beard look came from the Byzantine era painters to make Him stand out and seem more dignified than His disciples.

@guydellagi4372

Ай бұрын

The image looks like an orthodox priest.

@user-wn8cp3qf1x

Ай бұрын

Jesus with long hair has been depicted after the sroud of Turin got public. At first he had short hair and a clean shaven face, due to the influence of the Greek culture at the time.

@bazilio59

Ай бұрын

Hair changes length

@user-wn8cp3qf1x

Ай бұрын

@@bazilio59 No only that but as if, during his minestry, Jesus went from one barber to the other by foot.

@nikareyes7257

Ай бұрын

99

The critics reasons are ridiculous😂

Relics were big in the Middle Ages. Body parts of supposed "saints" were in a lot of churches. There were so many bones traveling around no way the relics belonged to whom the church said they did. I look at the Shroud as another piece of that tradition. People are desperate to connect to something physical in their faith. The Holy Face of Alicante, Spain, over 500 years of devotion, is another one. "The Holy Face of Jesus, the supposed cloth that St Veronica used to dry the face of Christ on the way to the Calvary, has been at the heart of one of Alicante’s biggest religious festivals since 1489." The face looks amateurish. But people are going to believe what they "need" to believe....

Dette skete fordi det er magisk hihi❤

Interesting! Do we ever know? Thanks for the great docu!

This documentary should have featured the STURP scientists, not those mere speculative persons. It even failed to mention the Sudarium of Oviedo whose patterns matched exactly with that of the shroud..

@cloudstrife3756

17 күн бұрын

this documentary is bias and for those of non believers..they didnt even mention all evedince found that this is from the time of jesus christ.

mkay, so the blood splatter analyst assumes a horizontal arm and a 90 degree perpendicular blood and makes no allowance for the fact that a crucifixion involved the drag downwards on the actual nail wounds?

That experiment with the blood sponge is embarrassing! 😂🤣🤣 Maybe the sword stuck in his chest went through him and came out on the other side of the body, that's why you can see some blood stains on his back too!

If one’s existence is only proved by a single piece of cloth, then I seriously doubt his existence. Rather call it a myth! No hate here but very hard to believe

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

if it is a fake, being how we're basically space age people technologically compared to anyone before the 20th century, why cant some brainiac/einstein not only recreate it to a thread, but also explain how someone did it in the 14th century? if it is a fake there would be a perfect clone of it by now easily...easily!

I remember to have seen a documentary of this shroud many years ago and they had the shroud carbon dated and it were from 1200-1400 C.E if i remember it correctly..

@ChristinaIntanTR

Ай бұрын

it's taken from wrong sample, from the part swed by nun to repair the relics after the fire at 1300s.

It's not Jesus. Jesus was jewish, not kaukasian.

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

where is your proof/evidence that the man of the shroud is a caucasian?

@user-wn8cp3qf1x

Ай бұрын

So what? I know quite some genuine Arabs that look kaukasian too.

I wonder what people think about the theory that the Shroud was created as a result of the torture of the last Templar Grandmaster Jacques de Molay in the 1300's just before he was eventually burned at the stake?

@hogwashmcturnip8930

Ай бұрын

You read 'The Divine Deception' too.

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

why would they use a linnen shroud for de Molay? the man on the shroud has the exact wounds that the gospel says Jesus endured before and at his crucifixion, de Molay was burned at the stake....why would they put a crown of thorns on the head of de Molay? why would they put a wound in his side?

@hogwashmcturnip8930

Ай бұрын

​@@commendatore2516 Read 'The Divine Deception' Whilst you may not agree with it ( I am sceptical) it certainly raises valid questions and more than proves how it was perfectly possible for people in the Medieval to have faked it.

@samuelschick8813

Ай бұрын

@@commendatore2516, "why would they put a crown of thorns on the head of de Molay? why would they put a wound in his side?" Why do people believe the extraordinary claims in the Bible and other holy books without question?

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

if the shroud is a fake, being how we're basically space age people technologically compared to anyone before the 20th century, why cant some brainiac/einstein not only recreate it to a thread, but also explain how someone did it in the 14th century? if it is a fake there would be a perfect clone of it by now easily...easily!@@samuelschick8813

Even if this shroud had covered a corpse there is no proof for it being Jesus. What matters his his teachings .

Whether it's real or not still does not prove it's the cloth that covered Jesus. There were hundreds of people being crucified in that, and all men had this same look to them in that place at that time. So no one can say for certain who's image that is. It could be anyone.

@UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN

27 күн бұрын

how many have cap of thorns? you said many name me one

How can the shroud been displayed sinds 1350 as Leonardo lived a century later?? Nonsense😂

I got a print on a towel of my backyard so its possible the sun has power

John3:16

@santinieverra2257

Ай бұрын

Said the book that ancient idi0ts wrote.

Wasn't it a Jweish holiday when Jesus was crusified and he only hung on the cross for one day . That's why the belief he rose after 3 days... with lots of aloe and help from his friends. Catholic's paid enormous amounts of money for relics to be housed in their Cathedrals . Really how many 100 dreads of yrs later...

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

if it is a fake, being how we're basically space age people technologically compared to anyone before the 20th century, why cant some brainiac/einstein not only recreate it to a thread, but also explain how someone did it in the 14th century? if it is a fake there would be a perfect clone of it by now easily...easily!

Da Vinci faked the shroud 😯🤯😱

@user-wn8cp3qf1x

Ай бұрын

Proof for that claim please.

maybe or maybe not.. who's know.. maybe fake maybe real.. who's know..

Great documentary but given up watching it, TIRED and BORED OF THE ADVERTS

@saifsiddiqui4434

Ай бұрын

you are watching it for free and putting so much tantrums... pay for the premium and then complain.

WHAT IF LEO DA VINCI REFERRED TO THE SHROUD FOR HIS PAINTING OF JESUS

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

the shroud is older, da vinci wasnt even born yet....

@sweetblueman

Ай бұрын

@@commendatore2516 yes.. the video says da Vinci created it since he painted Jesus image matches it. I don't agree.. probably vinci looked into shroud and created how Jesus looks.

@commendatore2516

Ай бұрын

if it is a fake, being how we're basically space age people technologically compared to anyone before the 20th century, why cant some brainiac/einstein not only recreate it to a thread, but also explain how someone did it in the 14th century? if it is a fake there would be a perfect clone of it by now easily...easily!

what a load 😂 hogg wash

@user-wn8cp3qf1x

Ай бұрын

Not that comfortable at all to struggle with cognitive dissonance, is it?

i dont believe her...she is a feely feely, not a data data

Lol...that woman's explanation is incredibly ridiculous and laughable. Childish even😂😂

If Jesus existed, we will all know. No need to go in great lengths to prove his existence.