SE Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant

Description

Пікірлер: 110

  • @kvrgagames5015
    @kvrgagames50152 жыл бұрын

    Ignalina NPP had 2 RBMK-1500 reactors and both were capable of producing 1500 MW of electrical energy each. And following the Chernobyl disaster, they were de-rated to 1360 MW and were still producing 2720 MW total by 2001, which was fascinating, as even today this would be a powerful decent nuclear power plant. The Soviet Union had the most powerful reactors during the 80s and only Japan developed their nuclear energy industry even further as some of their reactors are even more powerful than Soviet ones. But the Ignalina NPP was a truly powerful generating facility and after various reactor safety adjustments introduced after 1986, it could be run even longer. In short, this was an impressive nuclear plant.

  • @MetrakitProRaceII
    @MetrakitProRaceII4 жыл бұрын

    I want a RBMK2400 in my garden :)

  • @micahbell122yearsago6
    @micahbell122yearsago63 жыл бұрын

    Can I get a job there ?

  • @h.cedric8157
    @h.cedric81575 жыл бұрын

    EU is over stepping out of their bounds here. Possibly putting Lithuania in debt.

  • @runforit420
    @runforit4207 жыл бұрын

    The main problem with RBMKs was inconsistent build quality. Chernobyl had many known design faults identified by the KGB.

  • @rv1251
    @rv12513 жыл бұрын

    It wasnt about rbmk that one was reingineried to be safe ,it was about competition to europeans super atomic power energy France , u cant sell energy for kwh 7 cnts in EU , France wants to sell for kwh 0.70 cnts , thats an

  • @vervluukt
    @vervluukt5 жыл бұрын

    This power plant was safe! But a incident happened (which later caused the Chernobyl accident), so they actually even knew before the Ignalina incident and Chernobyl accident happened.

  • @jorgemacias915
    @jorgemacias9157 жыл бұрын

    Good Project Guys

  • @bulgingbattery2050
    @bulgingbattery20504 жыл бұрын

    Not great, not terrible.

  • @udin5061
    @udin50613 жыл бұрын

    RBMK 1000 IS DANGEROUS DESIGN

  • @Vincent98987
    @Vincent989875 жыл бұрын

    I live in vilnius and i dont want to abandon me city

  • @sergeyvalentovich6772
    @sergeyvalentovich6772 Жыл бұрын

    Находясь бы на территории БССР ,работала и модернизировалась до сих пор !!!!!

  • @pawelcitak83
    @pawelcitak833 жыл бұрын

    EU is similar to USSR, just in fact the colour is different the rest is much the same, once the country joins it loses the power just like the RBMK days before catastrophy in '86

  • @rumbler900
    @rumbler9007 жыл бұрын

    Did i just hear right ? rbmk graphite reactors are still in use in uk shit they kept that quiet anyone know where ie wich plants

  • @Name-zd5fq
    @Name-zd5fq2 жыл бұрын

    Chernobyl North

  • @alexmaccity
    @alexmaccity Жыл бұрын

    Graphite moderated reactors are safe.

  • @menetoihin3247
    @menetoihin32477 жыл бұрын

    2:29

  • @probasketspec5025
    @probasketspec50255 жыл бұрын

    Looks powerfull tho. Sad but not in use actually a good thing after the Chernobyl but still it have helped Lithuania a lot.

  • @MrProfessionaldj2003
    @MrProfessionaldj20033 жыл бұрын

    I don't understand why they don't let the plants run there course. They are already there. Use them for the lifetime they were built for. Then dismantle them.

  • @andrzejkulewski7388
    @andrzejkulewski73883 жыл бұрын

    fricking UE

Келесі