Would love a s90c vs s90d comparison! great vids as always

Glossy any day of the week. The comparison made by Rtings makes it clear how bad matte coating is. S90D is bright, colorful enough and looks more premium. Great content as always KG

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

I’ll take glossy finishes primarily as well if I got lights involved (unless it’s sunlight) and I see why most prefer it but light controlling the room eliminates any detrimental effects for me so I’ll just take the more capable TV, in this case it’s the S95D.

KG always killing it with the TV comparisons. I just went with 77G4. The matte screen on the S95D and the issues you mentioned on the S90D just isn’t it this year. Also the extreme thermal throttling is ridiculous. Besides this year the G4 has fixed all issues that was present on the G3. I think the G4 is the best TV till now + brighter and way less agressieve abl in gaming mode than my 65A95L

@kasramoghaddam1389

15 күн бұрын

Do you notice any color loss with G4 compared to QD OLEDs? I am sending S95D back because of all the issues.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

I just want to note that this throttling thing is not an issue I ran into nor will it ever likely impact viewers. Highlights are meant to be shown in bursts they aren’t likely to sustain brightness on any TV. I’m guessing the TV just detects testing patterns left on the screen and then protects the panel. I wouldn’t worry too much about it.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Yes depending on the content if you use professional mode on the G4 though (even just at default values) you will retain much more color than the default out of the box way.

@hattorihanzo1329

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG Rtings says: Unfortunately, large bright scenes are significantly dimmer than smaller specular highlights due to the TV's aggressive Automatic Brightness Limiter (ABL). After a minute or so with a sustained 10% window on screen, the TV gets very hot and starts thermal throttling, so it becomes drastically dimmer. Strangely Anyway the matte screen alone is a deal breaker for me. I loved the S95B when it came out. It was just ground breaking. Now LG has played catch-up. To be fair, i think MLA wouldn’t exist if Samsung didn’t invent qd-oled

@ahmet_10

15 күн бұрын

​@@TechWithKGWhen is the g4 vs s95d video coming out?

I got the 55S90D for $1,136.37 including tax! Super slick deal and cheaper than the 55S90C close out sales I saw! Extremely happy with the purchase and price (using it for my gaming/work Area)

What about the new update for the S90C that was just released ? Good or bad ? I hate playing the Samsung update or not game now !!!

Another good comparision KG. I ended up going for the G4 65inch. Got it on sale here in London for £2619 plus a sounbar including as well, from Richer Sounds.

You outdid yourself on this one. I especially appreciate the buying advice at the end. Keep up the great work!

S90D seems like the way to go. I personally prefer a glossy screen. But I can see the use for the matte screen in a room with some type of lighting.😊

Viewed the S95C some time ago at an audio/video higher end store about an hour from me. In talking with the rep he mentioned that the One Connect cable was not in wall CL2 rated. True????

I just got the A95L and it has a magenta purple tint when watching content. I don’t have this issue with the S90C. Are there any settings I can change to get rid of the magenta purple?

My pick will be S90D,i prefer more glossy screen and i dont need one connect box✌️

S95d for the win. My first OLED and I am enjoying the inky black scenes. I’m currently re-watching all of my favorite horror movies and it’s great!

@happyvish

9 күн бұрын

Hi i am going to buy s95d please tell more about heating issues and performance

S90C is the best QD-OLED you can buy for almost everything with great price. But for pure picture quality wise, Sony A95L still hold the crown

Thank you for this video , a very good comparison . 👍 , Dreamer 

Correct KG! Sony A95L is still a major contender. It would be nice if they would drop the 77" price to about the mid 3k range. Wishful thinking, I guess 😂.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Sony never likes to drop their 77s, they have had a hard time keeping it in stock that’s probably why, but I agree that’s a crazy price tag

@trewright1482

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKGI really don’t think they are over selling the 77 inch, but rather didn’t produce enough…

KG, so we only know that s95d 77" has a 3rd gen panel, but no one knows whether the panel on the s90d will eventually get a 3rd gen panel, was your comparison s90d also 77"? Should we just wait it out until after they run out of the 2nd gen panels, maybe closer to next year? Make no sense to get a s90d, when it uses the same panel as s90c/s89c 77" in the US.

Great video thanks brother

S90D has greater clarity, saw it immediately.

@scottbrady4472

18 сағат бұрын

That's what I thought.

Wow... What a review... Can save you dollars... I now respect the s95d, but something tells me go MiniLED this year, because oled territory is G4 for their efforts, so QN900D, Bravia 9, Hisense U9n for me

What about the S90C versus the S90D? I own last year's S90C. I think this TV is still amazing

@comanderjuul

12 күн бұрын

On Rtings they have in-depth nerdy stats on both and basically they're almost identical performance wise (for the QD-OLED versions). The S90D appears to use the exact same panel as the S90C but with very slight software changes and tuning and it may get a teeny tiny bit brighter. I'm hoping to snag an S90C next month when I move homes and hopefully it's still on sale then :D

@Eki274

5 күн бұрын

​@@comanderjuulIf you can buy a 77-inch s90c for $2000, the brightness will be the same as the s90d, both have a gen2 motherboard. And the 1200nit oled is as bright as the 2000nit qled.

Thanks for sharing

Just save yourself the money and get the 77 inch S90C with the Gen 2 panel. Or the S95C (hopefully you don’t have issues with the OCB)

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Right now that’s the best bang for buck deal yes I have to agree it won’t be for much longer though I can see them phasing them out within the next few months

I’m sure it could be the camera, but the S95D seems to have less color saturation in the higher APL scenes. Like the runway model’s dress for example.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

That example is on standard mode I don’t see this in FMM , game, or movie mode,

@stephenpatterson8056

15 күн бұрын

It's the camera. Digital sensors have difficulty particularly capturing the color red. And the brighter the red, the more difficult it is to capture properly. Oftentimes this will lead to reds looking washed out or looking more orange than red. Part of the reason why it's VERY important to not form an opinion based off of what you see in videos like this. Cameras cannot capture at all what these things actually look like.

Are the s90d and s95c the same picture quality wise?

@paulcox2447

15 күн бұрын

S95c likely looks better. They have better processing on the colors on the 95 series.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

They are pretty similar I’d say. Probably couldn’t find a lot of differences.

Il go for the s90d. Just waiting for a price drop here in Brazil. They

@RenatoKazuo8w

15 күн бұрын

Dude, if you have an Inter bank account, Samsung is selling the 55" S90D in their shop with 37% cashback today, going for R$4,220 ($827), cheaper than the best offers on the S90C from what I remember, If you don't have an account, I suggest making one, Samsung should continue selling cheaply until the end of the month.

@diego1294

15 күн бұрын

@@RenatoKazuo8w Eu nao tenho. Ainda esta esse preco? Da pra fazer o cartao e ja comprar? Pq esse preco nunca mais.

@RenatoKazuo8w

15 күн бұрын

@@diego1294 Yes, since lunch time, my account is old, so I don't remember, but it's a digital bank, so there is the possibility of being able to use it immediately after approval, yesterday it was offering 33% and it stayed for days offering 25%, so it's worth a try.

Great video again. s95d is better, but better than the Sony a95L ? Samsung s90c is still a bargain at 65in for $1599.

Man I got me a s95b and never looked back.

Can you see a mirror image of yourself in the S90D when there is a dark scene in normal indoor lighting / dark room?

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

I don’t know what constitutes normal lighting. I will say in a lit room with sunlight coming in yes it’s just like any other glossy finish with this in mind.

For gaming qn90c or s90d ps5

@TechWithKG

11 күн бұрын

S90D easily better than QN90C or QN90D.

I like the 95 but the one connect box bothers me since it's always had issues

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

So far so good on issues and I haven’t heard anything this year, but I definitely get the concerns. I’m not the biggest one connect fan either I prefer the old one connect from years ago but I get why they had to change it.

Kg can we get a S90D vs G4 video like this one

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Yeah definitely it’s in the works!

@kineahora8736

14 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG good idea. I have seen basically 0 reviews that prefer either the S 95D or the S90D over the LG G4. I might have gotten the s95D anyway because I thought I needed the 3/8” deep panel rather than the thicker panels on the other TVs, but I might be changing my plans for a bunch of reasons including the fact that the community overall seems to prefer the G4… Plus almost nobody likes dealing with Samsung Electronics and their lack of warranty versus LG’s more consumer friendly stance, despite the fact Samsung Display makes great panels. Samsung Electronics is the entity that actually implements the panels and make consumer-unfriendly business policy…

@305Nick

8 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG yess this is what im waiting for the most. Glossy v glossy. Ur the best kg

Saw the 77 inch got added and it says quantum on it … 83 takes it off in the description so it looks like the 77 inch is qdoled

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Yeah that’s not the case for every region unfortunately but US does have QD.

Wow, the S95D is brighter and closer to LED. I don't know why they didn't add some extra brightness to the S90D which is expensive enough and the better-selling model. I saw the S90C next to the A90L last year and the image was high APL so the S90C's image died compared to the X90L's. Highlights and dynamic range matter.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Both this and G4 is brighter looking in most content than any LCD TV I put it against including the QN900D. Gotta have separation in your lineup same reason LG does it with C4 to G4. Last year there was barely a gap between S90C and S95C. Samsung put the S95D on steroids though and really gave it separation.

@techsamurai11

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG Hopefully we can see them with a Sony in the mix. I think Sony does highlights really well and amazingly well in SDR.

90D seems to have the more natural skin tones and colors

How’s the natural sharpness/detail compared to the Sony?

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

I feel Sony OLED TVs look a bit sharper than both of these due to the extra edge enhancement usage with RC settings on by default.

@Jodez23

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG Is it similar detail with RC off?

Matte finish is the break factor for S95D, the ligh dispersion by Matte finish makes the display content dull and flat which is not acceptable to any OLED user to see. Gloss finish cant be beaten by matte finish and for the reflections on gloss finish I would say that lighting can be controlled , put heavy curtains on windows , switch off the light and enjoy the content on Gloss finish . Matte is flop!

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

That may be the case for matte monitor vs glossy monitor but it’s certainly not the case with this finish. If you light control the room you get no issues. In a dark room there is no difference to how the TVs look in regards to shine / sheen / that glossy look whatever you want to call it and it’s far from flat I can say with confidence that the S95D has more depth overall based on its capability it doesn’t have to tone map as much therefore will give you a deeper look than the S90D.

S95D has way more motion blur. It makes the S90D seem like it has none at all.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

You seen them side by side in person to come to this conclusion? If you’re judging it based on the video here please don’t because that isn’t representative of how motion is handled. You can’t really get a good sense of motion from the video. I’d say they are the same in regards to what you mentioned no difference.

@Rony-L

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG This doesn’t make sense, or else both tv’s would be producing the same amount of motion blur. You can easily test this by pausing frame by frame, or simply slowing down the video.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

It doesn’t translate. You can’t do this with captured footage because the camera is at a locked frame rate different than what’s displayed on the tv, not to mention everything else that happens when you upload it to KZread.

@Rony-L

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG You were both tv’s running at the same time, and shot with the same camera, or did you shoot them separately and sliced the footage together?

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Same time 1 camera two TVs but you also have to factor in the splitter

If you go to best buy and look at the s95d compared to other TV's it has a very flat almost acrylic look to the picture quality.this video comparison looks like it was done on low light because I can tell you at best buy the s95d had a very noticeable washed out look to it

@urbansouljah1

15 күн бұрын

Some best buy stores have it set up with horrible washed out picture. I've seen it at different stores and it looks incredible when it's set up correctly. It almost looked like someone purposely made it look bad in some of the stores

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Makes sense I can’t image S95D looks great in that kind of lighting scenario thankfully people don’t live in warehouses

I need to know s90d 42 vs c4 42

@TechWithKG

10 күн бұрын

I haven't seen them in this size. They are both WOLED. Based on what C4 is good at and not good at id say if gaming S90D if not gaming C4.

strange the s90c and 95c didn't have those clipping issues

@Zockosaurus87

15 күн бұрын

Not only that, the S90C and S95C don't get as bright but have a MUCH better picture in a dark room because they aren't matte.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

In a dark room S95D is much much better than the S90C and S95C.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Only S90D has these issues it was similar on the S95B at launch firmware update that everyone hated fixed that.

@Zockosaurus87

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG Of course not. The D series has a matte display and therefore a better picture in a bright room. But that's exactly what results in a significantly worse picture in the dark and that's what OLEDs are made for.

@alanclark9000

15 күн бұрын

Bro there's so much wrong about that statement. The fact you are showing the next QD-OLED but saying last years sucks because of a update should bother you. It's as simple as that. ​@@TechWithKGS90E comes out and D just gets tanked. Plus it was the 3rd time nerfing or sabotage the QD-OLED. Why you think s95d has a matt screen? Oh that's right, samsung knows they can keep playing with you. I didn't even know the s90d was 2nd gen QD-OLED. Rip off

Wait, is it established that the S 90 D definitely uses second generation QOLED panels? I don’t believe that has been documented … R*Tings already did this comparison and concluded the S95D was probably not overall better than the S90D, though there are areas where each one was better. You can see their reviews and comparison. For instance the S95D can get better peak brightness for a short time, but overheats so quickly that it gets “thermal throttled” and then is less bright than the S90D until it can cool off. Actually for this reason I will probably get a LG G4 that is much more power efficient (like 50% better than the S95D) and gets a whole lot less hot, and therefore can be brighter longer-though you do sacrifice some color gamut and color volume…

@TechWithKG

14 күн бұрын

It only thermal throttled because of a test pattern I’ve never once experienced this

@kineahora8736

14 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG that’s fair I suppose. However, there are lots of people that watch hockey with large amounts of white on the screen for a long periods… Also, in general, my room has a TON of trouble with heat deposition… and I think consumers really ought to be informed how much power TV uses and how much heat it throws… In any event , the S 90 D, the S 95D, and the LG G4 are all fantastic TVs. Most of the big reviewers I have watched and many consumers favor the LG G4. Again it has decreased color gamut and color volume, but probably better overall brightness. It seems the S 95D is relatively poorly accurate with its colors out of the box being quite tilted towards blues, and really needs calibration. The S 90 D is better with out-of-box accuracy, and the LG G4 apparently doesn’t really need to be calibrated at all-It’s quite accurate out of the box. The G4 is 1 inch thick, whereas the S 90 D is 3/16” thick through most of its panel, but over 1.5 inch thick for a significant portion at the bottom, and the S 95D is 3/8” thick over its entire panel- making it the thinnest overall-these dimensions will be important to some people depending on mounting options (turns out this is a major factor for me as well). Then there’s the whole matte screen thing on the S 95D, which I would say the majority of consumers don’t like. And it is debatable whether it matters that much but the point is most consumers don’t like it.

@TechWithKG

13 күн бұрын

Hockey is not full HDR brightness though that’s the difference and the screen will already dim down enough to protect itself and most won’t even notice it, all OLED TVs do this btw it’s called ASBL. Btw the general feedback on the S95D screen coating I see from replies is mixed and I get a lot of enthusiasts. Your forgetting a lot of people buying it aren’t that, and I’d venture to guess with how successful the frame with a similar coating I wouldn’t be shocked if most people like it. All non TV people I showed personally love it.

@lpromer4796

12 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKGhi, so is the S90D a 2nd Generation Panel for sure? Thank you kindly! 🙏🏽

The 95 was instantly obvious here

Quantum TV says the S90D looks better after calibration even though it's not as bright

@darrenhines7347

15 күн бұрын

that’s the problem it’s just his opinion picture quality is subjective just like beauty to a degree

$1,600 for 65'' S90C vs 3,400 + tax difference (~$100) for S95D That's not even a consideration. Now $1,500 Bravia 7 (hopefully it drops to that) vs $1,600 S90C - that's a tough one.

@saadmoot961

15 күн бұрын

Bravia 7 (W-Oled) alrdy lose vs any QD-Oled anyday everyday

@techsamurai11

15 күн бұрын

@@saadmoot961 except possibly when watching the 2 side-by-side straight on 🙂

Rting says the Samsung S90D is far far better TV than the S95D....

It's undeniable that the matte coating diminishes picture quality. You can't diffuse light without changing its quality. It's the New Coke of televisions.

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

I disagree to a certain extent but I think it’s a justified complaint if your room isn’t great for the coating ambient lights could be an issue , but in a dark room like I was viewing them the coating never hindered the TV. That said I see why people don’t like it once I start to get some light bulbs near the TVs

@MrUpscaleman

15 күн бұрын

@@TechWithKG I see the use case in a very bright, sunlit room. I have a bright living room during the day and it has zero effect on my A95L. My serious viewing, however, comes at night when it's dark outside and I can turn off all the lights in my living room. If your serious viewing is during the day, get a job.... :)

@TechWithKG

15 күн бұрын

Some people work at night lol for those people please light control your room

That matt screen on the S95D is awful, very bad design choice by Samsung.

All my Led people hit the thumbs Up, Vibrant side of the game 👍

@stephenpatterson8056

15 күн бұрын

My last three TVs were LED. I now have an S90C. It's easily the most vibrant TV I've ever seen

@travellearnrepeat571

15 күн бұрын

@@stephenpatterson8056 to dark for me but enjoy sir, you mean contrast not vibrant but we can take things differently

@stephenpatterson8056

15 күн бұрын

@@travellearnrepeat571 No I mean vibrance. Thanks to the quantum dots colors leap off the screen, particularly in movies with bt2020 colors. My fiancée who knows nothing about any of this stuff even noticed it. I was checking out Across The Spiderverse on 4K blu ray after I got this TV set up. She was just passing by heading to the kitchen and she stopped and her exact words were "Is this TV more vibrant than the last one?" The last one being a Samsung mini LED. QD-OLED is definitely more vibrant. Because it has the high color volume that QLED panels have but it's not held back by backlighting systems dumbing the color down a bit in actual content

@travellearnrepeat571

15 күн бұрын

@@stephenpatterson8056 I find oleds to dark for me but enjoy

@travellearnrepeat571

14 күн бұрын

@@drunkhusband6257 Led side of the Game over here 👊

Doesn't offer much differences when people buy these TVs just to watch some crap streaming videos.

At 07:30 the S90D looks MUCH better than the S95D... The S95D a lot of times in these side by sides looks fuzzy, more unclear and the color looks much less rich and more inaccurate... The color in the S90D looks much more deep, rich, and correct in almost every scene... I'd rather have better color and full hdmi bandwidth vs brightness for the sake of brightness and the coated screen with grayish blacks. The S95D looks surprisingly worse to me in most examples

avoid samsung at all cost ,they had such a horrible tv manufacturing mind set , don't lie about it lol