Watch other highlights: www.patreon.com/TennisLegends

When Sampras backhand was on, he was completely unbeatable. His serve and volley was almost always on. As well as his forehand.

1996 Sampras on fast courts is the greatest.

Sampras my idol! He dominated the 90’s era

I don't think Andre was playing that bad, it was just that Pete was on absolute fire.

People forgot how good he was, when was Pete in the zone he was insane.

@sliceserve234

23 күн бұрын

And he was in the zone for most of this match. Brutal.

Both bros in their prime. Scary level of tennis and true fast courts. Miss those times.

Pistol Pete, my youngsters idol. Sports Icon, Clean personification of offensive serve & volley & spectacular game on the court. Its great to see in modern times a lot his matches and brilliant plays in the Tube. I didn't have opportunities to see all his victories in 90s Fascinating person away of media hustle and bustle.

After Agassi's win over Sampras at the 1995 1000 Masters in Canada, it took him three years to beat Sampras again. Such was the disappointment Agassi experienced after he was confident he'd beat Sampras at the 1995 US Open (and the disappointment of how convincingly Sampras beat him).

Such a pleasure watching Sampras play. Looks so easy.

Pete Sampras da sempre il mio giocatore preferito. Sempre Forza Pistol Pete

I miss serve and volley tennis 🎾

Sampras' backhand was very underrated in my opinion... I think it's partly due to the fact that his slightly elevated elbow during the swing, rendered this shot non the most "elegant" of the one-handers... but it was heavy, and he was able to setup for very quickly for hitting the topspin. He hits winners and takes control of many points thanks to heavy backhands, and didn't show being in much difficulties against Agassi's backhand.

@EndoftheTownProductions

6 ай бұрын

Sampras had a great slice BH as well as the ability not only to go down the line but also to hit that loopy top spin backhand that would often set up his forehand.

@Skiiiiiifreeeeeee

6 ай бұрын

​@EndoftheTownProductions his slice was mediocre in the early part of his career but by the end he had so much sting. Unfortunately his topspin backhand suffered by the end. Coming from a huge sampras fan, at no point in his career was his backhand best in the business but it was always serviceable and one of his great strengths was he was never afraid to go for it even if he missed a bunch earlier in the match. Plus if someone approached and he had a target he seemed to focus more and was very good passing on that wing

@stealthcat100

4 ай бұрын

Your right , the high top spin backhand , which was in contrast to his devastating forehand , was a set up play for the opponent to go down the line , which Sampras left very open by hanging around the left side of the T during points . So by leaving that area open and enticing the opponent to go down the line meant that Sampras could use his devastating running forehand . The opponent couldn't really do much while receiving the loopy high net clearance backhand , and when they would decide to play the down the line they would face the flatter forehand and this is how he played to his advantage a lot . His backhand was the exact requirement for his game and a lot of people don't get this . Of course he could also pull the trigger on the backhand , more so at Wimbledon with his passing shots on the backhand . In general the backhand is never going to be a dominant kill ball type shot, its really the shield to the forehands sword .

Pretty shocking hot faster the courts in the 90’s seem. The 110 in 1996 feels almost 120 today

@andrewlegare6032

11 ай бұрын

They were much faster. San Jose was considered a slower hard court though

@Skiiiiiifreeeeeee

9 ай бұрын

I doubt San Jose was much faster than a lot of courts today, if at all. There was a much greater dispersion in hard court speeds back then. The Aussie Open, San Jose, Miami were all terribly slow compared to Cincinnati/US Open/etc. As for serve speed...110 in 96 is basically 120 today. They changed where they clocked the serve from being over the net to off the racket which added about 10 mph to registered serve speeds in the early 00's. That's why Sampras went from being basically a 125 mph server most of the 90's to suddenly registering mid 130's before retirement.

Gosh I absolutely love these two. Sampras was my hero growing up. Absolute superhuman level tennis between these legends...the shot making, the footwork, the court awareness, athleticism. The American golden generation.

What is so striking is the speed of the exchanges, how flat a lot of the shots are. Much higher risk than today's game. And the amazing counterattacking shots from a defensive position from both André and Pete. This is a real gem of a match.

@pietrpiepir6444

21 күн бұрын

Yes. It was harder to generate topspin with gut back then than it is with poly today. The fact these guys were playing at today's level with inferior technology says a lot about their talent.

@willzsportscards

18 күн бұрын

pre-poly era. we need to go back. tired of seeing counterpunchers like Djokovic winning Wimbledon

@blabla-fw9ix

10 күн бұрын

@@willzsportscards Ah yes , we would love to see 1-3 shot rallies , so exciting ........ There is a reason they slowed the courts down , because tennis was boring for the general audience . And also if Agassi can win Wimbledon in conditions like those then Novak who is a superior player to him would easily do so as well .

@willzsportscards

10 күн бұрын

@@blabla-fw9ixpendulum has swung too much the other way. Grass should have more serve and volley. Counterpunches shouldn’t rewarded. Agassi in 92? Dry courts all two weeks so ball bounced higher. And that’s the only example from the era, silly to use that for your argument.

@blabla-fw9ix

10 күн бұрын

@@willzsportscards The grass is actually pretty fast in the first week , it just gets slower in the second because of all the running on the baseline which ruins the grass . Also the racquet technology has improved a lot since the 90s which will make passing shots devastating for serve and volley players , not only that but players are more athletic now and generally are better at passing shots than they use to be by quite a margin . It just wouldn't work . Player's returns are also mile's better overall than what they use to be which will make serve and volley even more obsolete even with the 90s conditions .

Sampras locked and loaded was invincible 👍

@anaclarisss

5 күн бұрын

E ele não derrotou um jogador qualquer. Venceu simplesmente o André Agassi.

Pistol Pete was the master of serve and volley, a lost art. Now tennis is dull and robotic.

Pete is the greatest of them all! Classic serve and vollier even in this day and age I've not seen anyone nearly half as good as Pete especially when it comes to volley....

those were real fast courts. miss this part of the game and sampras game on those courts

Thank you for the upload, I lived that era. However, this is why Federer, Nadal and Djokovic brought tennis to the next levels, I can see winner shots in this match that in the big 3 era are not anymore.

This was Pete in his Prime

Look at the old Mercedes model lovely to watch 😊

Pete clearly wanted that mercedes

*Killer Sampras here, on fire mode.* For me he was the best of his era and the 4th best tennis player of all times, after the big 3 (Djoker, Roger and Rafa).

@user-im7db9kn6u

6 күн бұрын

Why after ? Just asking cuz they didn’t play at the same time not the same era and as for a fact Pete lost to Roger only once if I am correct in a unique confrontation ´ what Pete achieved in Grand Slam is also insane as well as those of the big 3 ´´´

@VashTheStampede4K

5 күн бұрын

@@user-im7db9kn6u Pete is my third favorite tennis player, after Roger and Djoker. It was a genius of tennis and I always liked his style: serve and volley at its finest.

Pete❤❤

Imagine if the ball had broken the car's mirror, especially by Agassi' serve return. LOL!

Donot know who wd hv beaten whom in imaginary world but sampras was undisputed king of 90s while big 3 are not even undisputed champs in their own era forget all time so how can they be GOAT.

@Michael-uk3pj

13 күн бұрын

It's simple Novak has won 10 more slams than him 34 more titles And spent 142 more weeks at world no 1...

1:17 typical sampras’ movement. Anyone could tell it’s sampras even with eyes half closed 😊😊

Back when you could put a car for advertising right next to the court. Crazy...

@amirjon

Жыл бұрын

They still do that. Someone nailed a bmw last year with their racket.

@siggemannen1

6 ай бұрын

That's a nice car

Aliens from outer space challenge Earthings for planet earth, i'm still choosing Sampras, period.

Pete always had the measure of andre

Pete always giving him the beatdown

@SonateSonate

Жыл бұрын

Agassi beat Sampras two years later 62 64 in the final. You're talking nonsense.

@connicrow9463

11 ай бұрын

@@SonateSonate 2 tears later Agassi started to use juice aka steroids "the clear" cream, the new hi tech undectable at the time PED developed by Victor Conte / BALCO. -- same stuff Bonds Sosa Clemens Marion Jones used. Agassi had to in order to elevate his game and be relevant in tennis. Otherwise he's not naturally as good a player as Sampras.

@SonateSonate

11 ай бұрын

@@connicrow9463 should I take your word for it? Of course I should.

@ciaronsmith4995

11 ай бұрын

@@connicrow9463 Agassi is much more gifted than Sampras. He's less athletic but a far better ball striker. Andre was the most complete player of his generation.

@stephenlow1841

22 күн бұрын

@@connicrow9463 Oh yes, doctor? Is that your official medical opinion or just one you pulled out of your exhaust port after Luke Skywalker shot a proton torpedo up it?

This was right before Andre became Methhead Andre.

@stephenlow1841

22 күн бұрын

He did meth for about five minutes,,,

The best

Would like to See the whole Match. Any ideas how to get the record?

Sampras had the best serve ever

True tennis!!

There's a reason why Agassi is remembered and not the other dude.

Pete could crush from the baseline, both off of the forehand and backhand.

TOTAL DEMOLITION

Even back in those days, the commentators would talk about this matchup as a rivalry, but as much as I loved Agassi, it really wasn't. Pete almost always had Andre's number. Pete almost always had everyone's number.

Mostly , Sampras seemed to get the better of Agassi in many of their meeting s Sampras was Thee no 1 attacking player with all the skills to overhaul any of the counter punches of his day

Federer 04 played on a fast court at us open. I feel djojovic would be okay on a fast court too. Nadal never won a major or even got to a final on a fast court. Djokovic played fed at us open 2007. When courts/balls played quicker

look kids ...this is real and durable Mercedes-Benz

Wow loook sl 500 legendary mercedes that is real price 🎉 amazing

Era lo más parecido a Federer- Nadal del futuro...

Sampras forehand 😅

Agassi was his closest rival but still Pete was head & shoulders above Andre.

@michelez715

2 ай бұрын

That's the funny thing. Agassi was his greatest rival in terms of how often they met, but in his autobiography Pete says he found Michael Stich his most difficult opponent, though they met far less often.

Funny how that Mercedes SL looks like garbage now!

Get that damned car off the court. You want a bust window or what ? Plus, court space is for the players, not for the sponsor who really wanted to be on display

Agassi wasn't playing well in this match, bad shot selection and too much unforced errors, he must be sick or did sleep well.

Sampras blocked agassi from winning grand slams with his one dimensional hard hitting ground strokes

The way Sampras, Agassi all the hit the ball back then was definitely good and ahead of its time. But nowadays thats changed. Players today have better rackets, better nutrition, better fitness are better than the game back in those days. That way of playing from Sampras, Agassi will not work in todays game. Novak would pounce on Sampras

Andre was a more complete player than Pete. Agassi was at his worst here too. If Agassi only hit to Sampras' backhand more often and nailed his passing shots, Sampras would never beat Andre.

@steveharaslin3822

10 ай бұрын

If? He could but he never did. He was always loosing the same way against Pete. Agassi was great player no doubt but he never reached Sampras greatness.

@Raimund6602

9 ай бұрын

Inwiefern kompletter?Sampras konnte alles,Agassi war mit Serve and Volley überfordert,also wer war kompletter du Hirnschüssler?

@blazetrent3407

9 ай бұрын

You're joking😂😂😂😂

@stephenlow1841

22 күн бұрын

@@steveharaslin3822 He won the career golden slam which Sampras never did.

@joeschmoe6908

14 күн бұрын

He was ways at his worst against Pete because he knew Pete was better and it made him choke. I've got nothing against Andre personally, but his game was an absolute snoozefest to watch.

Sampras in his better form would have clearly beaten Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and especially the doll Alcaraz, but today's children need their dose of illusions and exaltation...

@CarlosEsteban2024

Жыл бұрын

Y...conque argumentos basas esa idea...porque Nadal ,Nole y Roger tienen mucha mejor capacidad para aguantar peloteos..a mucha intensidad..Sampras era extraordinario ,pero en Clay no hacía mucho ,no era un extraordinario jugador en Clay,no aguantaba tantos peloteos ,y ese reves alto ,no hacía Daño ....

@francescoskorpion9557

Жыл бұрын

Federer no...the other yes

@vickyrajan5378

Жыл бұрын

On faster courts he will always have a chance... But his service should and must work in his favour... On slower courts he stands no chance... Fast courts or slower courts.. Peak Sampras would always have an inferior h2h record against Novak and Rafa for sure I still remember how Hewitt completely dismantled him in the US open finals.. U will argue that he was on the verge of retirement then.. But still he ended up beating Andre the following year.. Because Andre never had the nimble feet to go with his ground strokes... But hewitt had... He will always struggle against players who r extremely consistent from the baseline and extremely agile too... Here Novak and Rafa are better than Leyton and there level of play from the baseline even better...Novak is the best returner of the serve too.. They have got too much in them for Pete to overcome.. Though i feel Pete would always have a chance on faster courts and grass... But certainly he is not bossing that rivalry if it existed.

@silvio2869

11 ай бұрын

​@@francescoskorpion9557federer yes

@karimtourmous4692

11 ай бұрын

Look at you and think again on who needs his dose of « illusion ». How can you be that deluded ?

I had a run-in with Sampras when I was a Bollettieris the guy was a jerk 🤷‍♀️

@jagjitsinghmanku2283

10 ай бұрын

That’s interesting. What happened? Sampras seems to come across as a nice guy on camera.

@Skazellino

9 ай бұрын

Sampras is well known to be a prick.@@jagjitsinghmanku2283

@Eliath1984

7 ай бұрын

@@jagjitsinghmanku2283 Sampras is a pretty private guy so I'd bet the dude probably got aggressive trying to get time with Pete and Sampras isn't really to keen on that... from everyone I've talked to has said if they were respectful Pete was also extremely respectful and polite.. rub him the wrong way though and he's not so polite..

@TimelyAdventure

5 ай бұрын

Yeah we need details

@michelez715

Ай бұрын

If you had a "run in" with him, why would you expect him to be nice?

There's a reason Sampres could never won french open. Great player but one dimensional.

On a fast court, Sampras can beat anyone, including the big 3

Агасси на фоне Сампраса просто лошара