Lying about stealing cars is not the same as murder.

He DID NOT do it. A petty thief yes , a murderer No

This guy is being railroaded.

This attorney is a beast. He's even convincing the judge!! #AttorneyBrownGOAT!!!

I would have to vote "NOT GUILTY" due to the Prosecution not proving their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Brilliant defence by the Rastafarian.

Not enough evidence to convict... Not guilty. period...

Did you all see the close up of the man running from scene that was Jeff

@KL-tb5bh

13 күн бұрын

Where please? I know he did it.

@drewmoore365

13 күн бұрын

​@@KL-tb5bh 3:43:30

@KL-tb5bh

13 күн бұрын

​@@drewmoore365😮 omg Thank you

This man did not do it ! Just because he is a thief they want to make him a murdered

Hold up, he says: "he had every reason not to take something", are you kidding me! Do not put this murder on this bro! Unbelievable!!!

@caribbeancutie8975

11 күн бұрын

@@CiCiKnight every reason not to take something? Y the phucc did he go into the house then?

The EX-BOYFRIEND IS SUSPECT

@Liaa_Joe

13 күн бұрын

In real life.

I have to admit that I have reasonable doubt

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

Me too. There is reasonable doubt all over this case, even despite the best evidence of the prosecutor's two specks of blood found on the sleeve of his coat while the rest of his clothes and shoes were NOT soaked in blood only minutes after the murder and while he was captured on camera leaving the area heading home.

Why would he stab her 8 times to just run away? That's over kill. Hmmm...I say a crime of passion. Ex-boyfriend. Where is evidence on him of that much blood? What was his motive? The prosecution case is weak.

That guy on the tablets killed her

So he stabbed her 3x on the side of the neck through the hoodie, that means she was lying down on the side of her face or sleeping, in which case he didnt hve no reason to kill her. Plus nothing was missing in her home, so what was his intend to go in her home? He’s a thief after all but he dont steal nothing from an entire house! Yall need to stop playing!

@mamaafrica4521

11 күн бұрын

Amerikkka for the win🤮 Thus is just how the justice system in this country works if ur black or going against the wealthy! They’re all corrupt. We do not live in a democracy, we live in a authoritarian state

the type of criminal that burgles cars differs greatly from the type of criminals that do home invasion robberies. i dont think this guy fits the profile

How did she get outside? How much blood was there bc he only had specks of blood on his jacket

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

Good point, which makes him innocent. He should have had more blood that two specks of blood on the SLEEVE of his coat which nobody could see with the naked eye. NOT GUILTY.

He Got This Whooped😮

Why would he touch her with no gloves when he was making sure not to touch car door handles without gloves?

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

Another one who has not been listening to testimony. He was asked and he answered why he touched her. He was concerned seeing her lying down and unresponsive that she was someone in need of help. Would you not react the same way?

He's innocent

I haven’t followed the case. So what happened to the guy who admitted to the killing? Why was he discounted as a suspect?

@Don-rl1sm

13 күн бұрын

Because he didn’t do it. The guy whose jacket had woll’s blood on it did it, r e t a r d

@germanywho

13 күн бұрын

Because he white they want the black man to go down like always 💯✌🏾

@Leann68

13 күн бұрын

@@germanywhosuch crap , he murdered her because he didn’t want to get the habitual offender act slap on him.

@caribbeancutie8975

13 күн бұрын

Exactly! He’s white! 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️

@mortalclown3812

13 күн бұрын

​@caribbeancutie8975 Utterly disingenuous response. Half of the homicide detectives on the dept are POC: everything isn't about racism. (And to cry it out every time absolutely hurts cases when it DOES apply.)

This young man had no purpose.

Purposely botched...blame it on the black man.

This is the kind of lawyer you want when your in trouble! He’d get my coins tho however I wouldnt look at the matted hat he’s wearing😂😂😂

@joanscott4604

13 күн бұрын

Bright? Yes. Hardworking? Amazingly so. Annoying if you listen to him day after day? Yes!! The last high-profile case he represented the cousin (Zion Foster case) who sexually propositioned and then killed his 14-year-old (IIRC, she was a minor not sure about age) cousin when she refused his advances. Bryan Brown defended him just as vigorously using every trick to get him off.

@mortalclown3812

13 күн бұрын

He's a very good defense attorney - and public defenders who are this hard-working and smart are treasures in our system, imo. It must be exhausting work, especially since, in so many of the cases, his clients are guilty.

Judge falling asleep during defense closing. 🤭🤦🏽‍♀️

I’m here

And how come the knife wounds werent matched to the size, width of the supposedly used knife?

Who is that 3:43 ? 👀 looks like the ex that admitted to killin her

@lizoliver6193

Күн бұрын

Exactly!! How tf did the ex get immunity?? Prob bc he was white.

3:45:20 that IS the EX BOYFRIEND RUNNING AWAY from the scene. No doubt in my mind. Whyyy did he get immunity??

He is not innocent bottom line they just trying to railroad this Young man because his criminal past damn shame

She was expecting company in her text she stated door open

It's understandable he didn't call 911 bc it was no longer an emergency. They're would've sent coroner van

That night no way this guy would EVER have approched her and chech for pulse or breathing.

@mrdeebo313

12 күн бұрын

Why wouldn't he? Just because he's a thief doesn't mean that he's heartless

guilty af! but he should get a mistrial because of his lawyers hair!

@lizoliver6193

Күн бұрын

Racist much?

Are you kidding her ex boyfriend confessed but he recanted it said he was having a panic attack? What

Please explain how her blood got on his clothes. I want to find reasonable doubt, but his presence there and that blood is powerful evidence.

@Don-rl1sm

13 күн бұрын

It got on his clothes because he murdered her

@caribbeancutie8975

13 күн бұрын

It got on his clothing bc he touched her to see if she was breathing. If he infact killed her there would be way more blood on his clothing, and in that case HE WOULD HAVE NOT HUNG THE BLOODY JACKET IN HIS GF’S HOUSE or keep the murder weapon in the pocket! Remember that they found the jacket with specs of blood on the edge of the sleeve 6 weeks after the murder! Nobody is that dumb bro! NOBODY KERPS EVIDENCE AROUND!

@ESBEAUTII

13 күн бұрын

@@caribbeancutie8975he had a murder weapon in the pocket?

@marylouculkar4391

13 күн бұрын

Planting evidence.

@Don-rl1sm

13 күн бұрын

Caribbean there wasn’t more blood on his coat because he laundered it. He’s guilty. Best of luck in learning how to spell, r e t a r d

Prosecution did provide proof that he did this. Where is the timeline because it takes longer than 30 minutes for a body to be " cold & crusty" as he stated was the condition when he touched her body. Why was the ex-boyfriend about to wet his pants when the lady officer spoke to him in his car that night. He was to panicky & not to mention his admitting he did it. He was scared to death & his hesitation on the stand when asked questions.

Why would she keep the door open in winter ? Maybe waiting on someone that went wrong ? This is a confusing case

@constancereynolds3110

13 күн бұрын

One of her former boyfriends informed the police that she doesn't lock her doors. He mentioned this while he was giving his testimony.

@eatincrabmeats

13 күн бұрын

winter was mad warm, it wouldn't surprise me if it was a balmy 60 degrees that night haha

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

In the winter? It was in October, the fall. I wish people would get the facts right.

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

@@constancereynolds3110 which makes him the more likely suspect because whoever killed her knew her door was unlocked. Wasn't the defendant, who did not even know her.

@jodifocht5680

12 күн бұрын

@khalilfareed well in Pennsylvania it gets cold in October at night nonetheless

He didn't approach the man that was walking in front of him to rob him while he was walking during the nightp. Why not try to rob him?

@joemagri2018

12 күн бұрын

@trinettenash simple answer is he was awake. He wasn't expecting her to be on couch.

@MokBakin

12 күн бұрын

Honestly there must be a criteria of person that robbers target. They dont just target anyone

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

What? Why not rob him? Did you not pay attention to the testimony what he was interested in doing which was breaking into cars and stealing? He did not have any weapon to rob anyone for one thing; and secondly, had he robbed anyone he would have been the likely suspect in the victim's murder. Your point in your argument makes absolutely no sense. You are asking why he did not rob someone? That's funny.

So after she got home from the wedding she got situated and comfortable by changing clothing, prepared get cosy for the couch with a hoodie on? She supp had on 3 layers of clothing? If it was the winter time her freaking door would be closed! What woman leaves her door open laying on the couch when you live on the ground floor and anyone can walk in your mf house? Make it make sense!

@deedled4879

13 күн бұрын

Big weedhead. Forgetful

Guilty

@prettyhotgirl13

13 күн бұрын

How did he get her blood on his clothes?

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

Not guilty.

He went in the house, she woke up caught him robbing her , he murdered her so he didn’t get caught do he couldn’t steal her stuff.

@kaptainant7596

13 күн бұрын

There’s literally 0 proof he was in the house. The shoe prints left were not his and there’s no DNA or signs of forced entry

@robinellis2528

13 күн бұрын

How do you know?

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

Your argument makes as much sense as the prosecutors' lame, silly arguments that were unsupported by any iota of evidence.

If he was innocent he would’ve called 911 and get her help and get immunity from prosecution.,

@caribbeancutie8975

13 күн бұрын

She was already dead so he didnt see the need to call 911 bc he Didnt want to get himself in trouble knowing that 1: he had no reason to be in that neighborhood 2: he was breaking into cars all morning.

@mortalclown3812

13 күн бұрын

​@@caribbeancutie8975 He could've called anonymously. You're making every excuse for him without addressing a bit of their evidence.

@pink_like_a_panther4119

13 күн бұрын

@@mortalclown3812 You can't call anonymously using your own phone.

@Iamkenwoo

13 күн бұрын

lol.. like the ex killer. I mean boyfriend

@khalilfareed

12 күн бұрын

Not all innocent people call police. Get her help when she was already dead? Have you been watching the Simpsons or the trial? OMG people have the most bizarre points.

Geezzz the anxiety is real! Imma cry if he gets found guilty tho! I live all the way in Europe but….been following this from day one! HE DEF DIDNT DO IT! Its gon be a hung jury! Must aquitte!!!!

@joanscott4604

13 күн бұрын

Inconvenient that he's guilty. If he was Trump he'd get off maybe. Or Never have had to go to trial or get sentenced or...

@mortalclown3812

13 күн бұрын

Caribbean - Did you watch the trial?

@DREAMCATCHER33316

13 күн бұрын

Get a damn grip

@Iamkenwoo

13 күн бұрын

not gulity...

Closing arguments can be convincing!

@joanscott4604

13 күн бұрын

But all the evidence needs to be taken into account, of course. Closing arguments are to summarize. Ryan Elsey (sp?) did a masterful job.

@ladon2071

13 күн бұрын

You talking about closing arguments can be convincing , yes and lies too if you choose to believe them ,the man just didn't do it. . I see they are not even mentioning the ex boyfriend anymore of course Micheal Jackson is guilty of stealing out of cars. And their Science don't mean nothing

@Iamkenwoo

13 күн бұрын

yes.. they can be.. but it is the evidence that a jury looks at.. not gulity