SELL IT TO WHO, BEN? FUCKING AQUAMAN?!

@Michael-sb8jf

11 ай бұрын

never gets old

@musicaleuphoria8699

11 ай бұрын

Just about to say.

@GirlDickGang

11 ай бұрын

a true classic!

@grmpEqweer

11 ай бұрын

In Houston, trying to sell a house that has flooded before is a problem. I wish Aquaman was buying properties.

@KeeperOfSecrets-42069

11 ай бұрын

I like warter

So according to BS it would be perfectly acceptable for social media companies to ban all GOP CONS from their platforms because it isn't a ban on them as people but their behavior.

@Aarenby

11 ай бұрын

Or all religious folk-

@system1170

11 ай бұрын

It doesn't work that way in a self righteous mind

@MellowMaple

11 ай бұрын

it's just another form of projection. Their behavior is the problem, they Choose to be this way. They fight those who don't have a choice to be who they are and label them as the ones choosing their path.

@cjtherou4427

11 ай бұрын

​@@MellowMapleon point

@bryanhill1406

11 ай бұрын

...based on their CRIMINAL FRAUD behavior.

I'm gay af. Certain things about me are stereotypically gay....i work in fashion, I like Madonna songs...whatever. And growing up in the 80s, certainly everything i saw and heard should probably have convinced me not to be gay...IF that were possible! But it's NOT! Its not a choice. Unbelievable we're still having this ridiculous conversation.

@MichaelTurner856

11 ай бұрын

What do you do in fashion?

@jewdy8915

11 ай бұрын

If it’s a choice, then Ben should choose to suck a dick. (Which I have no doubt he secretly enjoys.) I’m straight. I tried having sex with women because I love women, but unfortunately it didn’t do the trick and I’m stuck with men. Boo! Dating a gay man would probably be fun, but again, we would both be disappointed in bed.

@samhhaincat2703

11 ай бұрын

@@MichaelTurner856 Why do you care to know?

@pee-ray5760

10 ай бұрын

We're still sadly having these conversations because people like Ben lack emotional intelligence and imagination like normal human beings. The lack of empathy and being unable to imagine a different lifestyle outside their own or even to self-reflect enough to recognise aspects of their own lives in others means they can't grasp anything beyond their own tiny experience. Sadly, these incomplete humans are elevated to soapboxes and huge platforms by billionaires in order to influence other incomplete humans.

@Her_Viscera

Ай бұрын

I woke up one day and chose to be trans and that makes me gay, so.. idk

"If those crippled people would just get up and walk, there'd be no problem with access to buildings." - Ben Shapiro

@moirasoma2863

11 ай бұрын

Thats it. That is exactly it.

@IMatchoNation

11 ай бұрын

"If you just hide that you're gay you won't be discriminated against for being gay; problem solved!" - Bench Appearo

@baxtronx5972

11 ай бұрын

"They don't deserve those parking spots." -Ben

@Thezuule1

11 ай бұрын

"How would anyone know I was Jewish if I didn't wear this silly hat?!" -Shabibo

@frontenac5083

11 ай бұрын

He never said that.

How do I know someone is racist if they don't self identify?

@john.premose

11 ай бұрын

"I'm not discriminating against black people I'm just discriminating against them drinking from white water fountains" is basically what Bennie is saying.

@matthewgagnon9426

11 ай бұрын

Don't worry, they'll tell you.

@ChefMimsy

11 ай бұрын

Just wait a few minutes. Racists have a way of letting you know, loud and clear.

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

@@john.premose That's a great point -- thank you! 🥰

@monabear7287

11 ай бұрын

Trump shirt or hat.

"I only discriminate when i know someone is gay, so that's alright"

@matthewabln6989

10 ай бұрын

You forgot to mention the initial discriminatory forced servitude.

If being trans is an ideology according to Little Benny, then discrimination against trans people would be solidly a 1st Amendment violation because you're discriminating against their ideology, their closely held beliefs.

@anthonydelfino6171

11 ай бұрын

yeah, except that implies that the right wing is at all moved by arguments exposing their hyporicy.

@HotDogTimeMachine385

11 ай бұрын

republicans: "nooooo, that's not fair, you're not supposed to use my own hypocritical logic against me! That's not fair! You're attacking me!"

@lonewolffang

11 ай бұрын

If I remember correctly, that's in the 1st amendment.

@cyablu6538

11 ай бұрын

The first amendment only protects against government discrimination based on speech. That's it. Private actors are and should be perfectly allowed to discriminate against others based on their views - that's actually the entire basis of cancel culture you lefties revel in

@mylesp89

11 ай бұрын

Idk if u know this but u are allowed to discriminate against someone because of their beliefs in many different contexts. Its just very specific types of beliefs that are protected.

I'm gay but I'm a little behind on how to "behave" gay. Maybe there's a manual for that? I mean apart from maybe nailing someone in the ass, I can't see how 'behaving gay' is anything other than just my normal behavior. Driving a car, buying groceries, drinking water? Is that gay behavior?

@rayflyers

11 ай бұрын

I've got some bad news for you about how a lot of straight couples have sex too.

@aggressiveattitudeera887

11 ай бұрын

Just behave like the main character of a John Waters movie. That's how you guys are identified. But seriously, every time Shapiro opens his mouth he proves he's a twerp.

@Matt-ru5rw

11 ай бұрын

😂😂

@Andrew-it7fb

11 ай бұрын

I mean, you're supposed to do all those things just extra fabulously.

@ChristianMission

11 ай бұрын

check out a gay parade

Nobody tell Ben he’s unconsciously using “they/them” in the singular. “How would you know THEY were gay unless THEY told you.”

@jimleon6634

11 ай бұрын

Wait until he finds out “you”, “I”, and “me” are also pronouns….

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

Ha ha, good point!

@SourEggz

11 ай бұрын

🫢

@lwo7736

11 ай бұрын

I hate BS but, they is also a plural pronoun. Lots of men went to the store = THEY went to the store. There's thousands of arguments against him, pick a real criticism

@Uncanny_Mountain

11 ай бұрын

Also wouldn't circumcision count as gender affirming?

Does Ben realize that this means his wife is not a doctor, but a person who happens to regularly perform surgeries?

@tinstrings6312

11 ай бұрын

Not to mention his wife could be perceived as a desert. Since she's so dry, according to him.

@ahouyearno

11 ай бұрын

Correction. She’s only dry with him. Her dryness says something about Ben, not about his wife.

@Thezuule1

11 ай бұрын

​@@tinstrings6312 she does not need a bucket and a mop. At least not when she's with her husband...

@davidspears4550

11 ай бұрын

​@@Thezuule1She told him she didn't get W.A.P. because he couldn't get wood,so he went to Home Depot.

@romario97711

11 ай бұрын

hahhah, he clearly means one thing but yall pretend to not understand, ugh. Changin slightly the argument he made to your favor to win an imaginary debate in your head and pat yourself on the back while saying “hahha what a dummy”.

"It's okay if you're gay, just don't ACT gay" basically Ben just wants us all in the closet, and if you're one of those people who has a very hard time hiding your sexuality, or you're a heterosexual person who reads to some as being gay, well you're SOL.

@dr.professor5229

11 ай бұрын

That's his public opinion. When he's being honest, he admits he wants all gay people in prison.

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

@@dr.professor5229 Wow, is this really true? Or mostly speculation?

@jewdy8915

11 ай бұрын

@@Terra_Lopezgay people turning him on is a real problem for him. The fault always falls upon the object of desire.

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

@@jewdy8915 Good point! Like in Saudi Arabia and similar countries where women have to cover their whole bodies and faces so as not to trigger the 'lusts of men'.

@Kite403

11 ай бұрын

Ben is just mad because he can't identify as a bigot without being called out about it. The only discrimination that should exist is against those who don't see the shift of history happening. Ben and his religious fundy friends are the minority; they can't stand being out of power. Hence the "silent majority" BS that Reagan allowed to prosper

I'm a 53 year gay adult male. This means that I used to be a gay adolescent, a gay child, a gay toddler, a gay infant, a gay fetus, and a gay zygote.

@jewdy8915

11 ай бұрын

It also means you make closeted bigots horny and jealous. Any woman can tell you that if our bodies turn a man on, it’s our fault and our responsibility to make sure it doesn’t happen. Same goes for your fabulous body!

@thetribunaloftheimaginatio5247

11 ай бұрын

Not according to this chowderhead. According to Benny-Boy, you were indoctrinated by Satan-cultists working directly for Hollywood and George Soros. It's the ol' "They Can't Breed, So They Have To Recruit" canart Anita Bryant never shut up about. Nothing new under the sun.

@gilberthamilton9312

11 ай бұрын

There aren't really gay zygotes, just like there aren't straight zygotes. Just genetic predispositions. The fact that we develop into having a sexuality doesn't make sexuality a more mutable part of a person though. The stardust we're all made of is phenomenally gay though.

@SourEggz

11 ай бұрын

@@gilberthamilton9312​​⁠ I’m a gay zygote. What now?! That’s right - I’m a fertilized egg cell and I am flaunting down the runway! Hair to the Gods, 9 inch heels and my cleavage, don’t get me started on it!

@whatkindofwalmart4545

11 ай бұрын

Cells are gay ?

"If you just hide that you're gay you won't be discriminated against for being gay; problem solved!" - Bench Appearo

"How would they even know if they were gay?" It's not even about if the person is actually gay, it's about being identified: "othered", and discriminated against, by the bigot for their perception. This can literally even be done to straight people. The lady who just won the anti lgbtq case didn't even have a gay client, they were perceived, or likely made up flat out. I wonder if Benny realizes there would still be a perception, and discrimination by bigots, of two straight guys being gay if they were to hold hands, show affection, dress a certain way, sound a certain way.

@twiggledowntown3564

11 ай бұрын

You hit the nail on the head with the holding hands part.

@samiamrg7

11 ай бұрын

One of the members of the “gay couple” named in the lawsuit is literally a straight man in a heterosexual marriage. He didn’t even know he was named in the lawsuit until just recently, which is honestly a failure of not just journalsim but also the legal system that they didn’t look into the validity of the claim being made.

@bryanhill1406

11 ай бұрын

This nazi scotus is a real problem. We are so fucked...

@nw42

11 ай бұрын

Benzo realizes that. This is just another of his cynical bad faith arguments.

@SomeCallMeAku

11 ай бұрын

I'm reminded of the recent viral video of the cis-gender woman who was thrown out of a public women's bathroom because some pearl-clutching sentient fossils screeched about her not being a woman based on her non-feminine clothing (hoodie and pants).

Telling gay people to "just behave" is a really stupid argument to make. If we reverse it and say that "hetero people just need to behave" suddenly they would cry out how discriminating it would be.

@Uncanny_Mountain

11 ай бұрын

That's why they do it Gaslighting, aka Grooming. Accusation in a mirror (AiM), mirror politics, mirror propaganda, mirror image propaganda, or mirror argument is a hate-speech incitement technique where one falsely attributes to one's adversaries the intentions that one has for oneself and/or the actions that one is in the process of enacting. During the 1994 Rwandan genocide, accusation in a mirror was used by the Hutus, along with other propaganda techniques, to incite the genocide in 1999. A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man". The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle. Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, *appeal to common sense* or the *_Divine fallacy_* (that is, pretending to be Omniscient, and able to know things you cannot know) is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine, as if your beliefs have any empirical or tangible values The Gish gallop /ˈɡɪʃ ˈɡæləp/ is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments. Gish galloping prioritizes the quantity of the galloper's arguments at the expense of their quality. Bullshivic (Bolshevik, bull, civic-minded, demagogue), someone who gains political power by appealing to people's emotion's instincts, & prejudices in a way that is considered manipulative & myopic; someone who incessantly reiterates the same petty complaints, until they are taken seriously. There are citizens with valid complaints & issues, but invariably the meeting will have to deal with some Bullshivic & his personal gripe of "supreme importance". *Gaslighting is a psychological term used to describe* the process of *grooming* someone into believing that they are losing it or going crazy. *Gaslighting a child is perhaps the most egregious form of child abuse.* Gaslighting is a common form of emotional/psychological abuse and can be used as a tactic in *grooming* children for abuse. The term comes from Gaslight (1944) a movie where the technique is used by the characters. *Gaslighting is sometimes also called “crazy making”.* *In the context of child sexual abuse (CSA) the **_gaslighting_** is often used to convince the victim all the abusive behaviours are fine, normal and an expression of “love”. It is used to ensure the victim doesn’t speak out about it and doesn’t fight back. It can also be used in concert with other **_grooming_** tactics like fear and isolation.* *Trivializing: The victim’s feels are made to feel like they don’t matter, are **_unfounded_** or they are weak for thinking so.* *Countering: This is quintessential gaslighting. * They _directly counter the memories and perceptions of the victim._ *Repetitive Questions: The abusive partner makes the victim doubt what they think or feel by asking the same question multiple times.* Questions are asked so many times the victim doubts their own answers. *Diverting: The abuser diverts the subject and puts the blame into outside circumstances.* "What Others Say": The abuser tells the victim what other people "think" about the victim, the abuser and/or the situation on whole. Literally what all Right Wing Fascist talking points are doing, making claims and arguments, asking questions that all rely on an unproven premise, which stumps the opponent because it's a logical fallacy. They then pretend to declare victory, knowing full well their crimes because the innocent don't know to lie. This is their entire toolkit, it's all reverse psychology, and Psychological warfare, perfected in Palestine, exported to the West. Republicans are Authoritarian Communists, America is a People's Democratic Republic with a Constitution, just like China, Iran, N Korea, and the USSR. All of which have _less_ inequality. Patriotism and Communism are Synonyms, they just Orwelled us into believing we were Capitalists, when in fact it's the rich leeching off the working class. This is why we must call for Direct Digital Democracy without parties or politicians. Citizen initiated referendums with thresholds and a social contract means Communities can vote their own laws. As well as a Public Authority to audit police and prosecute bad actors in our own courts. Thorium energy renders their global energy monopoly obsolete

@sebastianlavallee706

11 ай бұрын

Or more to the point: "It's ok if you ARE Jewish, but it's not ok if you ACT Jewish." According to BS that's a very valid reason to discriminate.

@jeremywatts8134

11 ай бұрын

That’s not what was said. You hear a Marxist talk and hear what you want to hear. Your sexuality is NOT who you are. You and everyone who listens to this sick propaganda are completely disgusting. You will feel the results of this programming and I won’t be there to help you, sicko.

@dylaninpieces2

11 ай бұрын

@@Uncanny_Mountain LGBTQ people are NOT groomers. Seriously.

@roosterqmoney

11 ай бұрын

Gay people do that. They do tell straight people how to behave. I'm not allowed to be neutral. If I don't participate in your nonsense I am a phone. If I am not an ally I am endanger of violent action taken against me. Because I don't want government money spent on celebrating holidays that I don't identify with. Gays are hypocrites.

His rant about homosexuality being "behavioral" and "not being an objective state of the world that is visible to everyone else," and subsequently coming to the conclusion that therefore gay people should not be a "protected class," is very strange. By that logic, the right to practice religion shouldn't be enshrined in the law either. Edit: Damn paused the video to type this comments, only for Sam to say the exact same thing the second I unpaused it lol

@mackayladavis4021

11 ай бұрын

Lol that happens to me a lot!

@LionDen

11 ай бұрын

Claiming homosexuality as enviromental behavior means the possible erasure of heterosexuality and its presumed naturality. Political lesbians and queer theorists used this argument very much in the 70s

@jedensnow1084

11 ай бұрын

That's not what Ben is saying. Ben is saying that there is a distinction between being black vs being gay in the sense "being gay" is referring to a set of behavioral characteristics whereas being black has nothing to do with behavioral characteristics but instead only physical characteristics. If "being gay" is a protected class, then that means we are forcing people to accept a set of behaviors, not some physical characteristic of being.

@ottobormann

11 ай бұрын

I have a lexicon issue with English, straight is something that it is not bent, curved or crooked. And mentally straight is associated with cleanliness, rectitude, correct, right, just word association. So if you are heterosexual you are “straight” and look at the connotations, the opposite of straight is what it is non-heterosexual. The use of straight as synonyms of heterosexual should be culturally faced out to avoid the implications of using this word.

@exposureeee

11 ай бұрын

@@ottobormann I completely agree.

"It's not discrimination against gay people. It's discrimination against certain behaviors, by people who just so happen to be gay. They would be just as discriminated against if a straight person had done it. That's all that the Supreme Court has said. If you engage in certain behaviors, then you *can* be discriminated against... For instance, getting gay married. It doesn't matter if you're gay or straight, it's the *behavior* that's being discriminated against." -a doctor's husband

@oldmanghost219

11 ай бұрын

That has got to be the most rediculuos thing I have heard.

@tjenadonn6158

11 ай бұрын

Some people marry into money, but never stop acting poor. Ben married into intelligence.

Seriously asking: What drug is this guy on?

@Aarenby

11 ай бұрын

Some sort of stimulant

@CCJJ160Channels

11 ай бұрын

Hypocrisy

@theholyone6

11 ай бұрын

Distilled hate for everyone

@rayflyers

11 ай бұрын

Conservative Judaism

@tylerbailey9329

11 ай бұрын

Money.

Ben thinks being a gay is a choice because it is for him.

@timtebone1843

11 ай бұрын

bingo!

@anthonydelfino6171

11 ай бұрын

exactly Margret Cho said something to this effect in a comedy sketch years ago. Something like "People think being gay is a choice, and it's not. And, if you think that it is a choice then youuuuuu...... are gay."

@trappedinamerica7740

11 ай бұрын

Ben decided not to be gay so he did his duty and made those kids. But at least she wasn’t wet when it happened. That would’ve grossed him out

@thetribunaloftheimaginatio5247

11 ай бұрын

Ben also thinks sexual arousal in women is a medical-condition. Because all he knows about sex and sexuality is "It's weird and scary and gross, therefore evil unless it's for making babies." He's basically a ten-year-old who got the sh*t kicked out of him for sneaking into Daddy's hidden stash of old nudie-magazines. An emotionally-stunted man-child who supports fascism because fascism is an ideology created by and FOR emotionally-stunted adult children like himself. Yeah, did you know Hitler's favorite books were fantasy-Westerns written for teenage boys? It's true... google "Karl May."

@cosmosofinfinity

11 ай бұрын

If someone held a gun to Ben Shapiro's head and told him to stop being straight, I wonder how easily Ben would get out of that situation since he can just flip his sexuality on or off like a switch

"If Ben Shapiro was an android, you'd send him back to the company for an adjustment." Can't remember who said it, but it's true.

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

Turn down the uptight hyperactive chipmunk settings? Who is up in everyone else's business, wanting to make decisions for us over what we can do in private?

@MrBendylaw

11 ай бұрын

@@Terra_Lopez I like to believe a few hard slaps would reset him; but that's just my farmer ancestry coming out. My liberal progressive inclinations say I should mock him in front of other people until he blows up. I'm a bit divided.

@Uncanny_Mountain

11 ай бұрын

Are we sure he isn't? Jamie pull that up

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

@@Uncanny_Mountain Nice JR reference!

@quantize

11 ай бұрын

Robotnocchio™

I kept seeing Shapiro and thought the video was sped up. After several videos, I see that’s just how he talks. What a ridiculous little man.

@The_Serpent_of_Eden

11 ай бұрын

I think he might be a robot. This is just not how a human talks. It is how I imagine an android would talk, though. The uncanny valley is strong with Shapiro.

Why would someone choose to be something that many law makers are trying to ban?

@jeremiahbarnes6313

11 ай бұрын

Because people rather be who they want to be regardless of lawmakers and political commentators discriminating against them.

@captain1jones354

11 ай бұрын

@@jeremiahbarnes6313 I understand that BS’s comment are completely stupid. Human sexuality is very complex. The idea that sexuality is based on behavior than nature makes no sense.

I guess Ben is saying he's choosing to act straight, it's not an inherent state of being. Revealing...

@rs72098

11 ай бұрын

All humans are inherently straight and attracted to the opposite sex according to our human genetic information.

@jewdy8915

11 ай бұрын

He’s really making it hard for himself to hire rent boys or get hook ups on Grindr. It’s only a matter of time before he is exposed by some brave Bear he met at a truck stop who he didn’t pay quite enough to keep his dirty secrets.

@tim3172

11 ай бұрын

*This* is him acting straight? Yikes. That's some Kristen Stewart-level acting right there.

@ProperlyGaming

11 ай бұрын

Thats always been the funiest thing to me, if your straight and are choosing to be so, your not straight your bisexual but are choosing to only pursue the opposite gender. As a straight dude its never been a choice between men and women, its only ever been women. The only choice ive ever made is which woman i want to pursue.

@mackayladavis4021

11 ай бұрын

@@ProperlyGaming 100%.

Ben peaked when he graduated high school at 16.

@ottobormann

11 ай бұрын

I have a lexicon issue with English, straight is something that it is not bent, curved or crooked. And mentally straight is associated with cleanliness, rectitude, correct, right, just word association. So if you are heterosexual you are “straight” and look at the connotations, the opposite of straight is what it is non-heterosexual. The use of straight as synonyms of heterosexual should be culturally faced out to avoid the implications of using this word.

99% of issues involving discrimination boils down to: "don't be an asshole." Just treat people with respect, regardless of what you do or don't know about them, and you won't have an issue. You're not going to get in trouble for misgendering a stranger in a bagel shop or fucking whatever. If you make a mistake you can just be like "oh sorry" and correct yourself and that'll be the end of it. People make mistakes all the time in social interactions, if you aren't going out of your way to intentionally harass or discriminate against somebody there's not going to be an issue.

100% Emma. 🏳️‍⚧️ Sam, Thank you so much for standing up for our community! 🏳️‍🌈

@steppenwolf3252

11 ай бұрын

He doesn't discriminate

"Is Ben Shapiro straight? Or are only his actions straight?" 🎯

When you really slow Benny down he starts to sound more stupid than morally bankrupt

@2727rogers

11 ай бұрын

Where I come from Ben actually is talking slow and you are right he is stupid and morally bankrupt.

It's a fundamental mischaracterization to say that anti-discrimination laws are about "forcing people to accept" whatever the thing they want to discriminate. You can accept it or not; that's up to you. But you DO have to respect their civil rights. Hey Ben: if businesses are allowed to discriminate against the "behavior" of being queer, then the government can "discriminate" against the behavior of denying them service on that basis.

@DefineHatespeech

11 ай бұрын

Except we can discriminate against you if we find it morally repugnant. And we do, and we will.

@andrerodney454

11 ай бұрын

How is it morally repugnant?

@DefineHatespeech

11 ай бұрын

@@andrerodney454 really? Try again you can do better

@andrerodney454

11 ай бұрын

@@DefineHatespeech do what better? Please be more specific?

Ben Shapiro treats psychology as some imprecise and unstable part of our existence, as if we can never accept what a person says about themselves as true.

@kathleenmahoney7650

11 ай бұрын

Do we allow people who indentify as anorexic to starve to death?

@LDrosophila

11 ай бұрын

Except when it comes to his ideology and beliefs

@lukeriely4468

11 ай бұрын

Or, as if personality traits do not exist. To put it better. There is no such thing as individuality. Religion homogenizes people, but i doubt it can go that far.

@kathleenmahoney7650

11 ай бұрын

@@lukeriely4468 you must not actually know any religions people.

@lukeriely4468

11 ай бұрын

@@kathleenmahoney7650 I was (and still am) an ordained Christian minister. The nature of penning a congragatiin into the "fold" by shepherding them through a series of beliefs that bind them is just a fraction of the process used to homogenise large groups of people. Politics has the same cult based facets. I am a psychologist, so don't bother me with your subjective opinions. The objective science does not care about your subjective opinions.

When it comes to Ben Shapiro, when is it not a rant? None of it ever invokes him and he rants as if his feelings and livelihood was on the line. He's grifting to people who don't even like him.

The mental gymnastics you gotta go through to support legal discrimination is bonkers. ESPECIALLY considering if certain brands of conservatism got their way he'd be discriminated against himself. I hope the money is worth it, Ben.

I've got to say, I didn't expect the Spanish inquisition

This coming from the same conservatives who say, "We can always tell!"

@odonnellcaleb

11 ай бұрын

What confuses me is even his basic premise is stupid. That's not the only way someone would know someone else is gay. It's not even hard to think of easy examples where that wouldn't be the case. But he couldn't be bothered to think that we now live in a world of social media where you can go search to find information about possible customers. Sure, that's probably not a step most people would bother following through with unless perhaps you're a zealot who thinks the person trying to buy a cake from you MIGHT be gay. But even still there's an obvious other way people could know about your personal life... And it's just that small towns exist. Where everyone knows everybody else's business. In fact just thinking about that has me horrified by the thought of how I gay teenager could be treated in a small town that is heavily conservative. They wouldn't be able to escape anywhere. They'd get bullied from kids at school and after school they could be denied service by those kids parents.

When I see Ben Shapiro, I think of those cops at this Jimi Hendrix concert. They were harassing these kids in the front row and Jimi walked up to the microphone and said " Don't get yourselves aressted, don't get aressted, it's not worth it ! They are just living in the past, LIVING IN THE PAST !!!

@Mydogslove2laugh

11 ай бұрын

Perfect!

Ben is such a pseudo intellectual cause wtf was that word salad in the beginning

@aggressiveattitudeera887

11 ай бұрын

Someone once told me that he talks fast so that people won't catch on to his bullsh-t.

@FrozEnbyWolf150

11 ай бұрын

He's basically saying, "Don't act so gay in front of me, I might catch the gay!"

@sisuguillam5109

11 ай бұрын

​@@aggressiveattitudeera887it's the Gish Gallop.

When people say that people choose to be gay or trans, I ask them when they chose to be straight.

@XavierWorthyfan

10 ай бұрын

Because male and female is the key to reproduction. That’s what god made man and women for. Can’t reproduce in a highly homsexual society. Gotta think a little more than that.

I'm glad Sam brought up the comparison to the Spanish inquisition, because it reminded me of an old Catholic policy of how to deal with religious minorities (e.g. Jews and Muslims). Basically, they're to be semi-tolerated, but marginalized and censored in the public sphere. Kinda like how conservatives want to treat LGBTQ+ folks these days.

@himoffthequakeroatbox4320

11 ай бұрын

I wasn't expecting it!

@ldfreitas9437

11 ай бұрын

Old Catholic policy, not in place anymore. However, there are right wing Catholics like Leonard Leo who pine for the days of the Spanish Inquisition.

@joeegg90

11 ай бұрын

@@himoffthequakeroatbox4320 Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

@irishhi8333

11 ай бұрын

​@@himoffthequakeroatbox4320 "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!" We could probably use some Monty Python right now.

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

Yes, exactly -- good point!

Lol like anyone actually thinks "no! I'm ok with gay people, I just oppose their gay actions!" Also in response to Ben's point regarding the business not knowing that you're gay. I challenge anyone to go buy a wedding cake and not mention their significant other in any capacity whatsoever.

Even racial discrimination is heavily based on behavior. How you talk, how you walk, how you dress, etc all contribute to how people perceive your race. And the major reason racists do the racism is because of the negative behaviors stereotyped to black people.

@imagem812

11 ай бұрын

Not only race but caste and educational level as well. Based on people's behavior. Why white people look down on "white trash".

@captain1jones354

11 ай бұрын

Racial discrimination is based on race. That’s why is called racial discrimination.

@52flyingbicycles

11 ай бұрын

@@captain1jones354 and race has several behavioral characteristics, stereotypical or otherwise.

@k.t.5405

11 ай бұрын

min 5:00 "you're black whether you feel black or you dont" Hmm...Who determines these labels in the first place? As far as I know "race" is NOT science, it is purely ideological. The entire American construct of "race" was originally based on the British Colonial Race Model which enshrined protection/privilege for the Northern European phenotype. 🤔

@juliereminiec4937

11 ай бұрын

So is Religeous discrimination

The only mistake you made was debating hysterical chipmunk on acid. They only understand one language - dominance. There are liberals. There are leftists. They keep calling all of us leftists. Why not live up to the name? It's not playing the game on their terms. It's putting the yapping little dogs in their places.

@bryanhill1406

11 ай бұрын

We are fighting for Liberty, hence the name liberal. Rethuglicons are fighting for a Nazi cult.

@Terra_Lopez

11 ай бұрын

Great points! I especially appreciate your observation that "They only understand one language - dominance." That's something I've been observing, too.

@elabuterin7150

11 ай бұрын

@@Terra_Lopez Eat or be eaten 🤷‍♀️

@David-kx7tz

11 ай бұрын

If ben was on acid maybe he'd actually express compassion for once lol

@sarawelling5271

11 ай бұрын

@@David-kx7tz I dunno. He'd probably be that guy. Seeing gawd and stuff.

"Discrimination against behaviors conducted by someone who happens to be gay" Ah yes, the depraved behavior of wanting to have a website made for your gay marriage. I guess Ben thinks websites are a kink, can't think of another reason he'd be against this.

@mikaelste-marie1275

11 ай бұрын

Funny thing. Nobody ask for a website in the lawsuit. It was an hypothetical gay couple.

@bunnybreaker

11 ай бұрын

​@@mikaelste-marie1275Not hypothetical, fake. The guy is actually straight and married to a woman, and he can make his own website if he wanted (he's a Web designer).

@mackayladavis4021

11 ай бұрын

@@bunnybreaker Is that even legal then? I mean the case. I thought supreme court cases could not be rooted in lies or hypotheticals.

@bunnybreaker

11 ай бұрын

@@mackayladavis4021 Seems like the supreme court is doing a bunch of illegal, immoral, and corrupt stuff lately.

@TheRationalPi

11 ай бұрын

​@@mackayladavis4021Yeah, it's incredibly bizarre that the web designer had standing in that case. Really makes it clear how biased the current bench of the court is.

Benny keeps trying to con us into believing he's finally escaped puberty because of that spray-on beard...the voice don't lie.

it blows my mind that anyone says that one chooses their sexuality. It's really easy to test... you can try it. Go look at a picture of whatever gender you're not attracted to and try to find it attractive. No matter what you do, you can't. You're just not that into it. You can even go kiss somebody, or go on a date with somebody, or heck even go all the way, and you're still going to be like "...meh, that wasn't really my jam" (or maybe you find out it IS your jam, but that's not really the same thing). I don't really like the whole "homophobes are secretly gay" narrative, cause I don't think it's true and I think it can be harmful. But like.. if a religious person truly _does_ think being gay is a choice, aren't they basically admitting that they'd totally be gay if it wasn't a "sin"? Cause I can't think of any other way it makes sense. I can't rationalize it any other way; I suppose I should have applying logic would be a fruitless endeavor😂

@gilberthamilton9312

11 ай бұрын

They don't care about the logic of their hate. It's just that pathologizing something you hate is a really easy/old trick to get people to fear it, to make said thing seem like something that could effect them even if it doesn't/wouldn't.

@rs72098

11 ай бұрын

All Humans are born with genetic information to be attracted to the opposite sex. We know this is the case because 98% of humans identify as straight. If we were given genetic code to make us attracted to the same sex, we would not be able to pro-create. LGBT is outside the norm. It is 100% a behavior NOT an identity. There's not a man alive, gay or straight, that hasn't been attracted to a women at some point in their lives. It's just being dishonest when people say they were born LGBT, it's not possible.

@haleyps6929

11 ай бұрын

@@rs72098🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

@Ciph3rzer0

11 ай бұрын

Some of these people protest too much. And I think lots of people are on some kind of bi spectrum. I have always been attracted to women, except I did feel attraction to a guy ONCE and it's actually in my top 5 strongest attractions. It was no big deal though, it was just an attraction, I really don't think I'd enjoy sex with a man, so I didn't think much of it. But if I was still fundamentally religious, I would have freaked the fuck out. And I believe many conservatives have had a moment of gay attraction, suppress it, and think they beat back Satan's temptations. In their view, walking with god will lead to less temptation, so they would believe gay men were just like them, but didn't stand strong against temptation. They don't really think there are guys out there with a natural attraction to men the way they're attracted to women. They think it's sexual perversion from giving in to aberrant behavior too often.

@The_Serpent_of_Eden

11 ай бұрын

@@rs72098 "All Humans are born with genetic information to be attracted to the opposite sex" So people who are not attracted to the opposite sex are not human? Great way to start off your thought process. Should you check yourself? "We know this is the case because 98% of humans identify as straight." Why does it matter the percentage who identify straight? it's very difficult to find stats on this, for obvious reasons (no one has asked every person on the planet their orientation, so we can't exactly get a good look at it, can we? Also, humans can lie), so it seems like an unknowable number. Where do you get your data? Why does percentage matter to you? "If we were given genetic code to make us attracted to the same sex, we would not able to pro-create." This is largely true, for mammals. There are many forms of procreation, though, including quite a bit of asexual reproduction/cloning, depending on the type of life we're looking at. There's also parthenogenesis, but that has never been confirmed in mammals, and certainly never in humans (that includes Mary, sorry!). But there's some big flaws in your argument. First off, who said we were "given genetic code"? Do you know anything about evolution or genetics? Do you understand how DNA works? Do you understand phenotypes? Do you understand how life has replicated itself throughout history? Have you studied experiments on abiogenesis, or read philosophical debates on life and consciousness? I'm guessing it's a no on these questions. Also, why are you assuming everyone wants to procreate? Yes, I'll admit that reproduction is often the drive for life (maybe the only true drive, other than eating?). And reproduction is crucial for the species; if life can't create a new life, then life is over, which has never happened. But there are 8.5 billion of us, dude. We aren't going to run out of people. In fact, we could use a trimming; in nature, when a predator population grows too large, the ecosystem breaks down, leading to a lot of death, and regeneration of different life forms. Maybe humans are just smart enough to observe this happening in real time--well, present company excluded, obviously. Anyway, some people don't want kids. There are other reasons to exist other than procreation. And it's pretty easy to get a kid if you want one, through adoption or surrogacy/sperm donation, or what have you. "LGBT is outside the norm." Why is this point important to you? Red-headed people make up 1-2 percent of the population, so that makes them outside the norm. Where is the line? About 10% of the world population is lefthanded, so that minority is outside the norm. And about 68 percent of the world has some degree of lactose intolerance, meaning only 32% can eat ice cream and cheese over the age of 5. Since that's the minority, they are outside the norm. And while English is the most commonly spoken language, at about 1.4 billion speakers, there are 8.5 billion people--meaning roughly 7 billion don't speak English, so English is "outside the norm". Is this point still important to you? Do you realize why maybe you shouldn't put so much emphasis on "the norm"? Your final points are absurd and do not warrant addressing.

For a long time it was believed that being left handed was bad and a choice. Children were forced to use their right hand. In some cultures it could be dangerous. Being gay is no more a choice than being left handed and the only behavior of being gay is being attracted to people of the same gender. There is no other “gay behavior “ any more than there is “ straight behavior “ .

Without even getting into tangential arguments about identity and how this relates to other protected classes, his primary argument doesn't even stand up on its own. It can be deconstructed even on the terms he's set. "This isn't discrimination against the identity, it's discrimination against a behavior." Okay. What behavior? Getting married? This website designer isn't objecting to the behavior of getting married. She would happily design a website for a straight couple. So the behavior is marrying someone of the same sex? Is this a behavior that any straight person has done or would do? No. It's a behavior that's **exclusive to** LGBTQ+ people. Therefore, it's not the behavior or actions that is being discriminated against; it's the group of people engaging in that same behavior that another group of people are allowed to engage in without discrimination. At which point this does dovetail back into your train of thought about identities, and you can list an infinite number of examples of how this ties into race, religion, and other protected classes. Eating at the luncheon counter while black? It's just the behavior! Marrying a white woman as a black man? That's just an action, it has nothing to do with his identity! Etc. etc.

@mackayladavis4021

11 ай бұрын

Exactly!

@murquhart86

11 ай бұрын

There really is so much wrong with Ben’s view. A major jurisprudential factor has to do with why a behavior might be discriminated against. Because it’s even broader than you say - even if certain behaviors were not exclusive to LGBTQ+ people or uniform amongst them, but still very much associated with them, those behaviors might still be protected. In Canada a couple years ago there was a case regarding Sikhism - for part of the year, their religion calls for wearing a ceremonial knife, I think it was for an entire month, and it’s a pretty large knife and this posed a problem for Sikh’s going into government buildings. In America, it may jurisprudentially be ruled that wearing said knife is a dangerous behavior, and therefore there is a plausible reason to discriminate against the behavior independent of the religious view. Importantly, it could be argued there is (a) a good reason to believe that it is truly not the protected characteristic being discriminated against and (b) there is a jurisprudential argument that this form of discrimination is overall productive for society. The obvious problem with, say, discriminating against gay men who exhibit effeminate behaviors, is that it is really difficult to imagine a reasonable person agreeing that there is ever a valid reason to do so. It really doesn’t matter that effeminate behaviors aren’t exhibited by all gay men or are even necessarily exclusive to gay men. The problem would be that (1) it is difficult to imagine a reason that is productive to society for this form of discrimination and therefore (2) a protected characteristic is being discriminated against for no reason.

@mackayladavis4021

11 ай бұрын

@@murquhart86 You're 100% correct.

Hey Emma, there are some "progressive" KZread news hosts that could use a lesson on not assigning ideology to all trans people.

@artieche9

11 ай бұрын

I was looking for this comment. I'm so disappointed in TYT 🫤

@samhhaincat2703

11 ай бұрын

@@artieche9 I walked away from that lib shitshow a long time ago. P.S. if you're not wearing a mask, you're just as disappointing.

Thank you for understanding the issues of trans and gay people. The haters see us as non-human and not important. The exact same way black people were treated back in the day. I'm trans and black. I have felt the hate spewing from all directions. I am so thankful for your channel and your support.

@eequalswtf6281

11 ай бұрын

@Gigabradchad69 As you use a mentally ill trope. Irony Gay or trans is a biological condition like cis and straight.

@handiable

11 ай бұрын

@@Gigabradchad69 Who's mentally ill? I compared the oppression of trans people not mentally ill people. I will continue comparing it. Hate is hate. Bigotry is bigotry. Lynchings are lynchings. That's part of the problem. Some of our black community don't see discrimination of trans as wrong. Now that we've overcome let's close our eyes to the struggles of the trans people. Such hypocrisy.

@JC-kd9qy

11 ай бұрын

🤣

@mantispunch

11 ай бұрын

​@@Gigabradchad69Being trans is not a mental illness. It is a state of being just like being born black or left handed. It is not listed as a mental illness on the DSM-V which is the structure of diagnosis of mental illness and the affirmation of trans people is backed by 300 scientific institutions

@mantispunch

11 ай бұрын

​@@Gigabradchad69Also Black trans women have been disproportionately killed more than any other type of Trans person. That's why the Black Lives Matter Movement stands with them and will hold up signs that say "Black Trans Lives Matter"

According to Ben’s “logic,” a business owner can discriminate against Christians or Jews not because they happen to be Christian or Jewish, but because they engage in religious actions & practices that are against the business owner’s beliefs. 🤔 My guess is Shapiro would disagree with this, but it’s exactly what he’s saying. I can’t believe anyone thinks he’s intelligent.

@mikaelste-marie1275

11 ай бұрын

Actually Ben has 0 problem with discrimination of any type. Including based on religion. That mean his entire town could ban him and his family from every service because he is jewish and he will not react.

@MegaTraianus

11 ай бұрын

Only kids younger than 12 believe Shapiro is intelligent. 🤣🤣🤣

It's amazing how Ben doesn't make the religion connection. Would love to see Sam ask him about this in a debate

@Uncanny_Mountain

11 ай бұрын

He knows full well Gaslighting, aka Grooming. Accusation in a mirror (AiM), mirror politics, mirror propaganda, mirror image propaganda, or mirror argument is a hate-speech incitement technique where one falsely attributes to one's adversaries the intentions that one has for oneself and/or the actions that one is in the process of enacting. During the 1994 Rwandan genocide, accusation in a mirror was used by the Hutus, along with other propaganda techniques, to incite the genocide in 1999. A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man". The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle. Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, *appeal to common sense* or the *_Divine fallacy_* (that is, pretending to be Omniscient, and able to know things you cannot know) is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine, as if your beliefs have any empirical or tangible values The Gish gallop /ˈɡɪʃ ˈɡæləp/ is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments. Gish galloping prioritizes the quantity of the galloper's arguments at the expense of their quality. Bullshivic (Bolshevik, bull, civic-minded, demagogue), someone who gains political power by appealing to people's emotion's instincts, & prejudices in a way that is considered manipulative & myopic; someone who incessantly reiterates the same petty complaints, until they are taken seriously. There are citizens with valid complaints & issues, but invariably the meeting will have to deal with some Bullshivic & his personal gripe of "supreme importance". *Gaslighting is a psychological term used to describe* the process of *grooming* someone into believing that they are losing it or going crazy. *Gaslighting a child is perhaps the most egregious form of child abuse.* Gaslighting is a common form of emotional/psychological abuse and can be used as a tactic in *grooming* children for abuse. The term comes from Gaslight (1944) a movie where the technique is used by the characters. *Gaslighting is sometimes also called “crazy making”.* *In the context of child sexual abuse (CSA) the **_gaslighting_** is often used to convince the victim all the abusive behaviours are fine, normal and an expression of “love”. It is used to ensure the victim doesn’t speak out about it and doesn’t fight back. It can also be used in concert with other **_grooming_** tactics like fear and isolation.* *Trivializing: The victim’s feels are made to feel like they don’t matter, are **_unfounded_** or they are weak for thinking so.* *Countering: This is quintessential gaslighting. * They _directly counter the memories and perceptions of the victim._ *Repetitive Questions: The abusive partner makes the victim doubt what they think or feel by asking the same question multiple times.* Questions are asked so many times the victim doubts their own answers. *Diverting: The abuser diverts the subject and puts the blame into outside circumstances.* "What Others Say": The abuser tells the victim what other people "think" about the victim, the abuser and/or the situation on whole. Literally what all Right Wing Fascist talking points are doing, making claims and arguments, asking questions that all rely on an unproven premise, which stumps the opponent because it's a logical fallacy. They then pretend to declare victory, knowing full well their crimes because the innocent don't know to lie. This is their entire toolkit, it's all reverse psychology, and Psychological warfare, perfected in Palestine, exported to the West. Republicans are Authoritarian Communists, America is a People's Democratic Republic with a Constitution, just like China, Iran, N Korea, and the USSR. All of which have _less_ inequality. Patriotism and Communism are Synonyms, they just Orwelled us into believing we were Capitalists, when in fact it's the rich leeching off the working class. This is why we must call for Direct Digital Democracy without parties or politicians. Citizen initiated referendums with thresholds and a social contract means Communities can vote their own laws. As well as a Public Authority to audit police and prosecute bad actors in our own courts. Thorium energy renders their global energy monopoly obsolete

@kathleenmahoney7650

11 ай бұрын

Why don’t Sam and Emma ask Ben Sharpiro for a debate? Because they don’t want to be embarrassed.

@sp-pz8uc

11 ай бұрын

​@@kathleenmahoney7650Because like me Ben's voice is annoying.

@lukeriely4468

11 ай бұрын

He must lay awake at night thinking up new arguments. He's been debunked on every hypothesis he's ever come up with (his actual scientific arguments), while everything else is subjective trite. So, why is he still streaming? Sense of superiority, perhaps?

@lukeriely4468

11 ай бұрын

​@kathleenmahoney7650 like his debate with Andrew Neil? Ben can only argue on emotion. He refuses to put points forward and allow replies without heating the debate and pushing an ignorant argument. Aside from those points, everything he says is based on subjective beliefs and one can hardly debate subjective opinions like academics study and debate object facts. What do you expect. His wages come from the Koch brothers.

And, on the "choice" issue, religion is NOT an immutable characteristic of people. If it were immutable, there'd never be converts to any faith. Cassius Clay wasn't always Muslim. Bob Dylan made a very public conversion from Judaism to Evangelical Christianity (he recorded several albums in the late 70s/early 80s that were heavily oriented to Christianity). Madonna was raised Catholic but she's explored Kabbala.

They don’t choose to be gay. They ARE gay. Just as importantly, the presentation of being who they are affects absolute no one negatively, in any real sense.

This is a little less direct, but is perhaps even dumber than the “sell your flooded house” moment if for no other reason than that Ben is Jewish, probably the most discriminated against (or at least notoriously discriminated against) religions in history.

Love Emma’s take on how people who call trans people and ally’s “trans activist” to dehumanize and to portray trans rights as an agenda or belief system. Cenk and Ana have a lot to learn.

@justsaying3223

11 ай бұрын

If you still look to emma to hear her take after she showed how inept she is on most of these issues when debating Tim pool, I guess you are going to be lost forever.

@nimrodery

11 ай бұрын

@@justsaying3223 Tim was the host, did you actually watch the debate?

@justsaying3223

11 ай бұрын

@@nimrodery I did but she was going back and forth with Tim a lot and when he came with a rebuttal, most if the time she responded by saying she wasn't well versed.

@nimrodery

11 ай бұрын

@@justsaying3223 Tim shouldn't have been talking, mostly. Remember when he got so mad he inspired a mass shooting, he tried to pretend Sam had done the same?

@yadabub

11 ай бұрын

Yes. It's like saying "angry black(person)" or "shrill woman." Really nothing more than a way of refusing to engage with what someone is saying, not based on the content of their words, but instead purely by the use of stereotyping.

This all boils down to degeneracy for them, and they will jump through any hoops to do whatever it takes to eradicate all the things that fall under that label for them, which we all know where that leads, because you can't eradicate "degeneracy" without eradicating people.

Ben Shapiro's whole argument goes in the trash if he thinks that religion should be protected class. Too bad he, a conservative public intellectual that talks about religion and politics continuously, hasn't thought as deeply about this issue as I did in the 30 seconds I spent listening to his rant.

@theferrit32

11 ай бұрын

Oh wait you all just brought up this point too lol

“A tax on yarmulkes is a tax on Jews” - Antonin Scalia.

@DIEGOSHAY

11 ай бұрын

That was RBG.

I was half-way expecting the Hbomberguy's skit when Sam said "play this"

“There is confusion that arises when it comes to LGBT+ issues.” No there isn’t, Pinnochio. You are the issue.

Can I deny service to Shapiro for having attended a bar mitzvah? I'm not discriminating against him for being Jewish, just for his "behavior" as a Jew.

“Don’t ever be in public with your significant other if you don’t want to be discriminated against.” - Benny Shapiro

I am sick to death of hearing “quote unquote” when they aren’t quoting anybody. The InfoIdiot does it too. And I can’t believe we are back to saying being gay is “a choice”. And I’m tired, tired of having to fight the same fight over and over and over.

@anthonydelfino6171

11 ай бұрын

He thinks it's a choice, because for him it is.

@theinvisiblewoman5709

11 ай бұрын

lol quotations aren’t just used as direct quotes. They can be used to quote emphasize or for irony (called sneer quotes). The thing is Ben’s use of quotes doesn’t make any sense

"Is Ben Shapiro straight or is he just acting straight?" Boom! That's gotta hurt!!

Ever notice that the brightest shining lights of the Right are ALWAYS the dimmest bulbs in the string?

@Ciph3rzer0

11 ай бұрын

You don't need to be smart on the right. You need to say what the power wants you to say and if they have the intelligence to question it that actually gets in the way of the most important work they do; manufacturing consent by parroting talking points on cue.

Plenty of immutable characteristics have real world actions that alter their behavior from a norm. Tall people have to bend down, have products made for them thst thry buy and use that accommodate their immutable characteristic. Ben acting like being gay isn't an immutable characteristics is odd, simply with the logic that it's actionable. Even if I never acted on myself being gay, I would still have those feelings. Just like a tall person is still tall even if they don't duck down to avoid a tree branch they're walking into.

Someone please tell Benny-boi that saying stupid things fast doesn't make them any less stupid. Also, enough with the "quote-unquote" garbage, he doesn't know how to use quotes. He's the verbal equivalent of Don Jr. waving his fingers around like he's letting out his repressed inner Playboy bunny.

Are we sure BS doesn't have a mental tick? Dude spews words and then lags worse than gaming servers.

Once you deny one group rights, who is next

Is there any chance we could play Ben Shapiro at half speed, so he sounds like a normal person?

I can't wait for the day that Ben comes out. His projection is strong

Pause it. Sam there is a difference between a culture & ethically Jewish & a religious Jewish. What Ben is referring to os religiously Jewish when he speaks about Judaism. Its not complicated to understand the difference.

*"Im not discriminating against you because youre Christian, im discriminating against you because you do Christian stuff."* **VS** *"Im not discriminating against you because youre gay, im discriminating against you because you do gay stuff."* Yeah, Republicans can barely read. I doubt they can follow that complex logic.

"There is no such thing as acting black. Acting black would just be stereotypes" - Ben Shapiro That may be the wokest thing I've ever heard from a right winger lmao

"Why are liberals complaining if we won't be able to tell if they're gay anyway?" Then why the fuck did you work to pass this law, Ben?

Why is there a Epoch Times anti lgbtq ad in the middle of this Majority Report video?🤦🏾‍♂️

@JEffinger

11 ай бұрын

Because the right has all the money 💰💰

@Mydogslove2laugh

11 ай бұрын

Block it

Emma just said exactly what I was thinking! Ben Shapiro gives me big twink energy. He's homosexual. He's just choosing not to express it.

@JustaSimplefact

11 ай бұрын

Excellent satire, I see your point. Nobody, gay or straight, is good at identifying someone's sexual orientation just by observing their behavior or listening to them speak.

Aside from the “you can just sell your underwater house” thing, this is the stupidest argument I’ve seen from Ben

My children are mixed race. My older son has an African born father, his younger brother has a Shoshone/Apache father. Unless I tell you that, you'd never know that they aren't 100% white. My children are protected from being discriminated. If my children are protected, then LGBTQ people should be just as protected.

Baby I was born this way 🏳‍⚧🏳‍🌈

Go Sam!

Repukes claiming that people "choose" their orientation without realizing that people (actually) choose their religion and making arguments against religion due to religious brainwashing is just *peak* hilarity.

I see nothing debunked. Just a cringy showcase of idiocy

Emma just hitting them over the fence. She got the assignment- Emma really needs her own show, cut Matt & Bradley’s input by 1/2 and Sam can guest host. Thoroughly on top of every topic.

Ben Shapiro's ignorance is ceaseless. "You're not being discriminated against for _being_ gay, you're being discriminated against for _acting_ gay. Just, you know, knock that shit off."

It's against my religion to service conservatives now lol

Ben made his point clear, that without making declarations of homosexuality, another person cannot identify the sexuality. You completely ignored that. Completely

Ben thinks gayness only comes down to action because he is also gay, and has same sex attraction, but hes different because he doesnt act on it. Classic closet case argument

@kevinskiles2033

11 ай бұрын

That's why his wife doesn't orgasm.

Ben: I don’t agree with pride self identify Also ben: wears a Jew hat 🎩💴💴💴🎉🎉

@OddWoz

11 ай бұрын

“But you wouldn’t know unless I told you”

Translation: "All that I'm asking is that you go back into the closet."--Ben Shapiro

I think this was Ben saying nobody knows he’s gay because he doesn’t act gay.

Ben is either focused on the gay community because it's an easy target to make him money or because he's jealous he doesn't have the nads to admit who he really likes and that isn't the fault of the gay community but the people that help provide him his platform. Either way it's disgusting and he would be less hate filled if he just got honest.

I’m so confused. Besides watching homosexuals actually have sex. Aren’t gay people just people in public?

@anthonydelfino6171

11 ай бұрын

we're just people when we're having sex too.

Shapiro talks like Christopher Walken on triple speed.

so if he thinks that being trans is an ideology and that does legitimize that others discriminate against them, I wonder if he would be ok with people denying him services because he has subscribed to his religious ideology. he completely forgets that the only reason he thinks the lgbtq+ community is more a ideology than a state of nature, is because he judges these people through his own ideology.

Ben Shapiro has definitely had same sex attractions.

A house plant could have successfully debunk this inane nonsense.

Other animals are gay. Observable in reality, not action based. Checkmate dipstick

It's like this: SIN is NECESSARILY a transgression against a god or gods, nothing or no one else is included. Therefore, sin, as defined in religious writings, cannot exist until a god or gods have been demonstrated to exist. Thank you attending my TED talk.

Ben Kasperian Shapiro. Or Ana Shapiro Karen Kasperian?

Mr Seder, you have created an argument/video around something never said or eluded to by Mr Shapiro or the SC.