Russian Nuclear Weapons in Space? Here’s What We Know. | WSJ
Russia wants to put a nuclear weapon into space, new intelligence suggests. Although details are slim, policy experts said that the technology could be used against satellites, raising questions about Russia’s intentions and the potential ramifications of an orbital detonation.
WSJ looks at the history of nuclear detonation in space with Starfish Prime and explores what we know about Moscow’s development.
Starfish Prime test footage courtesy of Atomcentral: • Trinity and Beyond - N...
Chapters:
0:00 The U.S.’s new intelligence
0:37 What we know so far
1:45 Starfish Prime
4:21 Russian capabilities in space
News Explainers
Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.
#Russia #Nuclear #WSJ
Пікірлер: 1 000
Russia has had FOBS systems in play since the SS-18 went online. This is designed as an anti-sat/EMP weapon. What most don't realize is that any Teller-Ulam thermonuclear detonated as a high atmospheric airburst will have this effect. This is not new, nor is it terrifying. Literally been around since at least the early '80's.
@toxicgracie3772
3 ай бұрын
Exactly, Cold War tech. This is fear mongering at it's finest
@I_cant_sneed
3 ай бұрын
shhhhh people arnt suppose to know that
@johnnyllooddte3415
3 ай бұрын
an emp is not a nuke.. thats just stpd silly
@tweety9003
3 ай бұрын
Qatar customer service
@SyntaxErr19287
3 ай бұрын
Operation Starfish prime
Isn't this the plot of Modern Warfare 2?
@drwalka10
3 ай бұрын
lol It def was 😂
@padhlekaamaayega
3 ай бұрын
The 2009 one?
@AspieTrips
3 ай бұрын
yes the only good MW2, not this new stuff. @@padhlekaamaayega
@rundown132
3 ай бұрын
It's all coming full circle
@gregorio3139
3 ай бұрын
The real plot is that this is another (((urgent))) fundraiser for the MIC.
"Be very very afraid." - the news
man this just gives me throwback to the mw2 campaign
@9kk99k9k
3 ай бұрын
It is. 😂
@furkanyldz8460
3 ай бұрын
game has already begun, wake up neo
It’s called fear mongering. It helps the military industry complex thrive.
@SilverStarHeggisist
3 ай бұрын
Exactly and it helps line politician's pockets
@redredwine1054
3 ай бұрын
So are you telling me Putin was fuelling the "military industry complex" when he was threatening to use nukes because of Ukraine?
@r3dp1ll
3 ай бұрын
@@redredwine1054 he never said that. He said if they are directly attacked by NATO.
@diamanteduul8084
3 ай бұрын
@@redredwine1054You know Putin never directly talks about nukes? The headlines you see are always his RESPONSES when he is asked to comment about US/EU politicians talking about nukes. At least that's how 'nuke' talks started 🙃 now the cats out of the bag
@YaraMits
3 ай бұрын
@@redredwine1054i can assure you, ruzzia had never used its nukes on civilian targets, unlike murica. See?
And then they blame the normal guy's fridge for the hole in the Ozon layer
WSJ commentator keeps calling it Starship Prime while the original footage clearly says Starfish Prime, AAAAHHHHH
@sirdiealot53
3 ай бұрын
My brain 🫠
@damaimakhlukhidup
3 ай бұрын
depending on the language culture. As we always say, if we do something America can disagree. But if America wants to do something, we have to agree. Otherwise it means we are not friends and America will invite friends to impose sanctions on us. This is the double standards of the dictatorial king's democratic ideology. So starfish for certain people might be starship.
@Crangaso
3 ай бұрын
Chocolate Starfish Prime
@philip2205
3 ай бұрын
@@wishunter9000 Notice how they called it "Starfish Prime" in the chapters... They made thiny slip ups in reporting before you know. I find it ironic how you care so much about this one screw up yet place no emphasis on the otherwise excellent video...
@philip2205
3 ай бұрын
@@damaimakhlukhidup I'd much rather follow what America has to say than China. Besides, I find that connection a little farfetched...
I feel confused, a few months ago the news came out that the Russians had run out of missiles there, even the infantry was fighting with shovels. Now I find them threatening open space. Isn't this magic?
@russelljames5631
3 ай бұрын
Us propaganda designed to continue public support on both ends. On one hand we should spend more on military because they are almost finished but on the other hand we should spend more because they are such a threat.
@RadagastilBruno666
3 ай бұрын
@@russelljames5631 In a few words, War Machine Industry...
@enlighty
3 ай бұрын
Wait, wait , wait. I remember that MSM said that there are no rockets left in Russia and Ukraine says that they use microchips from washing machines for rockets and now I have to believe that Russia builds nuke weapons in space with the same chips from microwaves and washing machines that are being stolen from Ukraine? Am i getting it right?
@DrFumiya
3 ай бұрын
@@RadagastilBruno666In even more fewer words. Rich elites.
They've had an anti-satellite capability for years. You've never heard of the satellite that releases another and then that releases another that could be used as a kinetic impactor at short notice (cosmos 2519, 2521, cosmos 2542, 2543 + rocket powered projectile)? Apparently this 'newer' threat is nuclear powered, not a nuclear (explosive) weapon. Enough power to jam satellites over a large area, to prevent surveillance, not to physically destroy them.
@davidgoodnow269
3 ай бұрын
Yeah, a lot of people seem to be missing that point . . . .
@defencebangladesh4068
3 ай бұрын
Exactly
@blackmagnetica8714
3 ай бұрын
you forgot Kosmos 2499, probably the most sophisticated out of all
@jojolafrite90
3 ай бұрын
Huhuh. But that won't knock out all of society in one boom. Any nukes in space, yes.
@threeMetreJim
3 ай бұрын
@@jojolafrite90 Jamming GPS from above could well knock out a lot. A fair amount depends on it these days (mostly for accurate timing).
That simply means Pentagon wants to deploy nukes up on space. That's spooky.
@larrymunn5279
3 ай бұрын
... I don't think that would solve this particular issue idk how much of this you watched or took in. The solution to too much radiation isn't to pour even more on lol.
The US military budget is literally 20 times of Russia’s, yet Russia has Orbital Nukes and hypersonic missiles.
@lajoswinkler
3 ай бұрын
"Nuclear weapons exploding in space" is NOT "orbital nukes".
@wanderingquestions7501
3 ай бұрын
Well you have to consider the added expense of all those the USA bribes….. just to keep things in perspective. And the USA’s budget likely supports a number of other countries’ militaries.
@sam8404
3 ай бұрын
Russia is so great, we should all move over there /s
@rog2458
3 ай бұрын
And you don’t think we have the same or better? Come on dude.🤫
@cryora
3 ай бұрын
Costs are also higher in the US.
StarFISH prime. Not starSHIP prime! C’mon WSJ, help me take you seriously
@randyboisa6367
3 ай бұрын
I thought it was Geidi prime, or Optimus prime, or even Amazon prime.
@cyotedude
3 ай бұрын
I choose not to take them seriously. WSJ as with all other media, are for-profit and will sell whatever brings in the revenue, or whatever capitulates with the current power. Recommend: listen to sources, but give credence only to fact-based believability. I always ask: What are your sources.
@mapache-ehcapam
3 ай бұрын
To be fair Starfish sounds like the wrong name
@morris9524
3 ай бұрын
Don't have to be agitated about it, your agitation is agitating my agitation
I’m American and I know that we have already put that up there long before Russia
@MONTEZZ90
3 ай бұрын
U ppl think everything is from you and one can’t do anything before you guys. Joke .. even the Chinese are ahead of US
@MuantanamoMobile
3 ай бұрын
Even the Boeing X-37 robotic space planes...have been carrying out such tests for years. And can be used to eliminate their satellites. If true...this would just be levelling the playing filed again, and is unlikely to work in the way fear-mongered s it makes zero sense. The nuke-powered battery EMP-Satellite however makes more sense.
Those nukes are already up there. And we have nukes in space too.
@MinusMedley
3 ай бұрын
😂 Can see who this video was made for...
starfish prime test was in 1962
It will also damage their own satellite if they do that.
@lordraydens
3 ай бұрын
they have reserves
@Neo......
3 ай бұрын
it won't
@DakilangAtsoy
3 ай бұрын
@@Neo...... 🤔 nuclear blast in space will fry all unprotected satellites as what was explained happened in 1960. There’s no barriers in space so the radiation or disturbance will travel fast and strong.
@x-hale2899
3 ай бұрын
Are you guys actually hearing yourselves? You've gone mad.
@sam8404
3 ай бұрын
@@x-hale2899no see, Putin just says "no nukesies backsies" before he launches it and then it won't damage their stuff.
Russia is tired of Mark Zuckerberg 😂
So I guess, the Russian Strategic Shovels Program is more dangerous than the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture or PWSA, a program undertaken by the Space Development Agency
@abdirhmanali6320
3 ай бұрын
I see what you did there 😂😂👊
@milanradovanovic3693
3 ай бұрын
But those are NUCLEAR shovels, not just regular ones!
@maxbounce5736
3 ай бұрын
@@milanradovanovic3693 Of course they are. Look, I’m no rocket scientist but isn’t it how shovels work?
@milanradovanovic3693
3 ай бұрын
@@maxbounce5736 I am not sure that's why I am asking... Maybe they are planing to transport used shovels from Chernobil and target USA with those radiated shovels by throwing them from space. But then they would have to transport like millions of them from space, right 😂😂😂
Wouldn't that ignite a direct full-scale war with the United States of America? One has to think what tremendous capabilities the U.S. has today if they achieved Starfish Prime over 6 decades ago.
Im not here to defend Russia but having no cultural analysis in any of these news stories is mind numbing. Russia has been historically anti-nuclear in terms of space and seen it as a joint venture. At the height of the cold war there were countless joint space missions for gods sake. Many russians still see space as the ultimate frontier and the pride of their nation for their early achievements in space flight. A nuclear attack would be indiscriminate and damage russian assets equally. Damaging the last of their presence in orbit would be unthinkable for Russia, unless in an all out war of course.. .
@JigilJigil
3 ай бұрын
Putin is crazy, 400000+ Russians soldiers are dead because of his invasion, he doesn't care about anything but himself.
@Bradgilliswhammyman
3 ай бұрын
Treaty agreement to not militarize space...looks like Putin is breaking that.
it is called “starfish prime” not “starship prime” - this is a very famous test/incident. and they literally said it just before you said it wrong.
Theres no chance that we dont have them up there too.
@Neo......
3 ай бұрын
we don't
@thelonewrangler1008
3 ай бұрын
Exactly! This is definitely the military industrial complex getting one of their intelligence buddies to scare everyone into opening their wallets for "protection". We've been drawing up and bragging about theoretical space weapons for decades on top of having active programs like the X47b and SR72. The US, Russia, and China have all demonstrated they can shoot down satellites many years ago and how it would cause a domino effect taking out everyone's satellites. It's the part where they keep stressing its nuclear that gives it away as no real threat at all and just your everyday fear mongering
@jpl6596
3 ай бұрын
@Neo...... oh, you think just because there's a "treaty" that would stop us?? You tapped there tons of rules/ agreements that the US don't follow. They'll just never tell you
We are in the day and time where anything can happen.
@jackashmore
3 ай бұрын
But nothing ever happens
@lajoswinkler
3 ай бұрын
@@jackashmore Except it does.
@randyboisa6367
3 ай бұрын
The only time anything ever happened was August 6th and 9th of 1945, since then the world has been one big boring politicly correct soap opera.
@distorteduzi
3 ай бұрын
@@jackashmorethey said the same about ukraine look at it now
@jackashmore
3 ай бұрын
@@distorteduzi and look how it’s stalled out, just now Russia is finally making progress. I highly doubt much will come from it.
Thought this was a thing in 1970s. Nuclear weapons in space wouldn’t really require Russia to develop any new weapon components. EMP would have a huge impact on society. Don’t know what the new intelligence is and not sure why it was brought upon a public forum.
@barometricfunk
3 ай бұрын
And it would fry their satellites just as much as it would ours.
@agapelove992
3 ай бұрын
Regan's Starwars
@BCAT3089
3 ай бұрын
to scare the public!
@Bluespicygreen
3 ай бұрын
Yeah this is not new, every nation with nuclear weapons can do this. Both the USSR and the United States detonated nukes in space, we don’t do this now because it would hurt everyone plus kill people in the Chinese space station and the international space station. In summery it’s just dumb to do in our modern era.
@thomasbeachnaw9019
3 ай бұрын
That assumes that its even a nuclear weapons platform. Creating space debris is dangerous to all the world. The Chinese boasted of a laser to disable them, but a controlled EMP with a Faraday cage protecting its electronics if devised would be the most effective, non violent non damaging way to get what you want without crossing lines.
now we know why Zuck is building a bunker
@goulddddable
3 ай бұрын
the Reptilians know
I find it absolutely hilarious that these people are freaking out about it and making a big deal. You know we've probably had nukes in space for at least 5-8 years already.
@randyboisa6367
3 ай бұрын
Thats false. The DOD and Space force do not have nuclear weapons in space.
@FKCENSORSHIP
3 ай бұрын
@@randyboisa6367why? cause they "told" you that? 🤦♂️
@brandtbollers3183
3 ай бұрын
Brilliant Pebbles .Regan Regime.
@randyboisa6367
3 ай бұрын
@@FKCENSORSHIP Yes my senile stumbling stuttering friend Joe Biden promised me there is no nukes in space, Karine Jean Pierre also affirmed it.
@randyboisa6367
3 ай бұрын
@@FKCENSORSHIP Yes, my senile stuttering stumbling friend Joe told me, and Karine Jean Pierre affirmed it.
This is not new I've been knowing this for years...
This has bin there for 50 years. The sky is falling the sky is falling send money fast to Ukraine.
Let the Aliens handle space
Russia had a cow when Reagan said “ Star Wars “
Gosh, it's like the "October surprise" has come early this election.
@jefferydraper4019
3 ай бұрын
Biden had a bad week and they needed help earlier than expected. Im betting the October surprise will be some way to halt the election...you know...to protect the democracy or something.🙄🙄🙄🙄
Great idea❤
That’s all very interesting, but could you tell me why Putin is drinking heavily?
@greggemerer8251
3 ай бұрын
Great, reading the Sun again for your news?
Russian nuclear weapons in space could cause emp's that could blackout the US electrical grid; and it only requires one mid size one over the central US at an altitude of 200 miles above earth. The widespread grid blackout would interrupt food supplies for weeks; of which grocery stores only carry 3 days worth at any given time - resulting in mass starvation of the general populace.
As much money as the U.S. spends on defense (more than the 9 counties combined) we should have to worry about anything from anywhere. In all fairness to the military, half of it probably never leaves the DC area. Didn't we see this in Space Cowboys?
@cryora
3 ай бұрын
I'm sure they leave the DC area, but they go back to that area because that's where all the defense companies that sell to the military and government are headquartered.
@k333rl
3 ай бұрын
it's not that we spend more than any other country. it's that the other countries don't spend a dime on their own defense and rely on a 100 year old alliance to watch their backs.
@Freedom4all31
3 ай бұрын
Nope- we spend more than the next 9 countries combined, including China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. @@k333rl
@Freedom4all31
3 ай бұрын
Thats also where the crooked politicians get kick backs from their so called lobbyists.@@cryora
@sinistereleven9145
3 ай бұрын
@@k333rl , we spend more than any other country and what 100-year alliance, are you a head in the sand democrat.
Nuclear powered does not mean nuclear bomb
The Wall Street Journal has become a source of amusement.
Why is the US obsessed with Russia
@Asya062
3 ай бұрын
more like the other way around
@Baphomet101
3 ай бұрын
Please walk into fast moving traffic.
@srgtwigpusha
21 күн бұрын
Russia is a treat to world order. "world order" is Nato.
They essentially made real life 007 GoldenEye emp based satellite weapon.
When the US does this: Look at this, we made something that will keep the world align. When other countries does this: THIS IS DESTABLIZING, THIS IS TYRANNY!!!
@AlJebra
3 ай бұрын
Did you ever pause to think of why that is? Russia, Iran, China, North Korea are totalitarian societies that invade and threaten neighboring countries, throw journalists in prison and 'disappear' opposition political candidates. The US... well, come to think of it, that's pretty much what the Democrats are doing.
@appleintosh
3 ай бұрын
Both of those statements are true, and if you think it's hypocrisy then you have no understanding of western global hegemony.
Nukes in space make no difference when you already have submarines that do the same thing better
@1serious0mfr
3 ай бұрын
Right, like ICBM exists and they've existed for a while now
@thelemon5069
3 ай бұрын
Submarines do not have the capability of knocking out satellite communications
The issue isn't the US's response. It's the response of Russia's new owner, China. They won't be too happy knowing their growing space capabilities are at risk due to the meth-head just north of them.
@SinkLikeStone
3 ай бұрын
Lower orbit is full of starlinks satellites, i reckon that no one would be happy
@caravanstuff2827
3 ай бұрын
Unlike NATO, china and Russia will have hardened their state owned satellites against EMP attack!!.❤️🙏🇺🇸🇺🇦
@elibrod9981
3 ай бұрын
Russia never had any owners..
@avex3903
3 ай бұрын
is that what your wifes boyfriend told you
@Gerrard_Pike2008
3 ай бұрын
Russia don't have any owners . They do everything they want🙃
This could be dangerous. Even an astray satellite can do a lot of damage.
Faraday shield sales just went through the roof
Russia has a right to defend itself.
@ttcc5273
3 ай бұрын
Russia does not have the right to invade sovereign countries… Putin did not have the right to assassinate Navalny.
@Baphomet101
3 ай бұрын
Please walk into fast moving traffic.
@DavidJohnson-tv2nn
3 ай бұрын
I'll bet you're a Tucker Carlson fan or Trump supporter? In any case... Please move to Russia.
@_ShahriarKabir
3 ай бұрын
@@DavidJohnson-tv2nn your bet failed😂😂. And I don't need to go to Russia. I have my freedom of speech 😂😂😂
@_ShahriarKabir
3 ай бұрын
@@DavidJohnson-tv2nn btw usa can develop anything we can but if other country does then its something bad.
America took the first shot in space with the creation of the, and it's almost impossible to say without laughing, the "Space Force". Until America, as Americans like to say, "do better", the world remains at risk.
@invalidaccount2315
3 ай бұрын
good, were the biggest military bring it.
Electro magnetic impulse can also hit the high flying bombers and fighters , so it would make harder to be unnoticed for planes
Interesting.
Fake news
@ray017ray017
3 ай бұрын
you need a hobby dude. got too much time on your hands
@Stardust_CE94
3 ай бұрын
@@ray017ray017 dude you are literally reading the comments and thinking, ah I need to have an opinion on this guys opinion. How am I the one wasting my time!
russia 🇷🇺 has all the right to defend itself 🤍💙❤️
@Baphomet101
3 ай бұрын
Please walk into fast moving traffic.
So…. The us “defense” sector needs more money again…. Wow I’m surprised there is not a little bottle of cocaine in the presentation 😂
Star Wars?!
I know jump cuts are not nice to look at sometimes, but using morph cuts in a journalistic medium is unethical.
"Well boys i reckon this is it"
I remember this movie. Space Cowboys with Clint Eastwood, James Gardner and Tommy. Lee Jones.
Does anyone know how to use Google? Russia used a missile to destroy their satellite in 2021.
@heinzletzte.6385
3 ай бұрын
pretty sure they censor these things soon
@larrymunn5279
3 ай бұрын
I think I remember that.. I know there have been many attempts to bring down starlink systems via intrusion as shooting them down one at a time would be a waste of time, but seemingly none have been very successful with active management. They had more success bringing Canadian power grids offline. For whatever reason. Spite, I guess lol.
@jojolafrite90
3 ай бұрын
Google has stopped working years and years ago. Corporate greed killed it.
The EMP weapon in the space is very old, I believe Rusia have a new way to generate electromagnetic pulses, we see in the evolved of Rusia electronic warfare.
One would think they would use lasers to destroy satellites not nukes.
One against many weapons? Interesting
We need Meek mill as kang the Conquerer for space detonation 😉
The Fine Print: Politicians are looking to cash in on sweetheart deals with aerospace companies to create a countermeasure. Media promotes stories like this for public buy-in. (To bad that contract cash can't be put towards Jim and Jane American.)
@mantonesei9097
3 ай бұрын
All of a sudden we have UFO's everywhere, Russian nukes in space, time to boost the military spending
Mr. Vladimir Putin said that Russia is against developing nukes in the space. Meanwhile, this video says the opposite. 💀
Smoke and mirrors to take your eyes off what really is going on .
@soloslim544
3 ай бұрын
I see it...
@darkNovaskar
3 ай бұрын
What's really going on? Let's see if we're on the same page
@TheCrazyMoparDude68
3 ай бұрын
@@darkNovaskarthis is fake intel to get more aid for Ukraine. Russia isn’t a threat to the US now, so they have to create a threat. Scare the people into believing that Russia is a real threat and they will approve of hundreds of billions of dollars for Ukraine. And it will also help Biden come election time.
If Russia shouldn't feel threatened by NATO expansion then the U.S. shouldn't feel threatened by Russia expanding into space.
@appleintosh
3 ай бұрын
That's not how things work
@MuantanamoMobile
3 ай бұрын
😂 two can play that came...what's good for the goose...
A nuke is a bit extreme for a satellite
Yeah I saw that movie too.
And nothing about "OUR" secret space plane we sent up there first?
Starfish or starship prime, which one is it
@caseykelso1
3 ай бұрын
Doesn't anybody remember Ronald Reagan or are you all too young to realize it he put up Star Wars program go look it up youngsters don't be so afraid this is the problem with youth of America they don't read and learn and know nothing about our history half of you people don't even remember 9/11😂😂😂
This was a “STAR WARS TREATY”
The old school narrator said "Starfish Prime"😂
@mikerodix4800
3 ай бұрын
That's what it was called
@MuramatsuInosuke
3 ай бұрын
@mikerodix4800 The new narrator is ruining the whole program then! I like Starfish Prime waaaaaaay better! Lol!
Hasn't Golden Eyes satellites have been in orbit for 30 years or so
Ohh, comon. Nukes, in space ?😮
If only we put so much into things that create rather than destroy.
As if the US doesn't have nukes in space....
We got star wars irl before gta 6
Those who has the higher station has the power.
As usual, it takes some time for us to get the full picture. Russian MoD recently reported to Putin they identified about 50 military, and 250 commercial satellites that actively participate in the war against them. They didn't specify how, only that this is an issue we need to "resolve".
Anyone have "Space Nukes" on the apocalypse bingo? I just got the "Rogue AI" last month with news about SORA.
Like we don't
And let me guess, Boris Grishenko is helping them work on it.
What a freaking joke. Using nuclear bombs to destroy satellites ... Yeah of course.
Lol, love the subtle threatening sounding violins as Putin appears.
@jannguerrero
3 ай бұрын
It's propaganda piece when they're trying to emotionally manipulate you
What if theyre working on a way to prevent their tech and satalites from being affected by emps?... if thats possible, this might be him beginning to test it. Imagine the advantage of using multiple emps while being the only one with electical infrastructure and quick communication........ they're not strong enough to beat the world, so why not kneecap it first to even the playing field.
The end of commercial space is nigh.
Now if they are doing this we are 10 steps ahead that's for sure.
I assumed they had those years ago…..
And in the process, damage ozone layer, well down !
if we get into nuke war we all die but if the nukes are in space now we all die plus extra!!! so scarey!!!
@Juan-yq3fb
3 ай бұрын
Russia is being painted wrongfully. America is the bad guy brah.
@enigma51ted
3 ай бұрын
not only is there zero proof... this as always been possible since the mid1960's.... do not think this something 'new'. any ICBM can be programmed to launch and then park in Orbit around the earth, since the early 1970's. basic orbital astrophysics. i ask, why is everyone Suprised by this 'news'? and insane lack of science education among the the sad human race
WSJ, what did the U.S. do to cause Russia to do this? Back in 1962, the U.S. placed nukes near Russia's border which started The Cuban missile crisis. When the U.S. removed the nukes, the Cuban missile crisis ended.
Interesting? Didnt we implement Under Ronald Regan The SDI system? Space Farce guys!
the U.S. tested nukes in space after WW2
@Zegeebwah
3 ай бұрын
Yes, I watched the video. Did you?
@profX-27
3 ай бұрын
not all the way through. my comment was more towards equivocating than an actual question.
I guess MW2 (2009) is coming to light right in our faces. 🤔
I was wondering where that guy on the side of the road with the sign saying THE WORLD ENDS TOMORROW went. Glad he made it to NYC and got a job.
All the treaty agreements no longer bidding 😂
Meanwhile two real wars are happening in real time back here on earth, with no end in sight.
OMG. Dangerous !.
Ok the Gauntlet has been shown to us what shall “WE DO” ?
Since when did the plot from "GoldenEye" become a reality?! 🤷♂🤔
So you worry about weapons put in places where they shouldn‘t be … well, well, well
WSJ Actual Meaning: US wants to deploy nuclear weapons in space but can't do it without saying it feels threatened and doing it for a just cause.