1 year later, Russia is still running out of missiles.

@sarthaksahu5500

3 ай бұрын

90 days later.....Palestine is running out of food and fuel

@raduprodan1011

3 ай бұрын

LOL! Indeed

@Fuck_YT

3 ай бұрын

they are, forced to buy from other countries now.

@theswatguyxd8978

3 ай бұрын

@@sarthaksahu5500nahhh

@user-ij6ve3rw6s

2 ай бұрын

its 2.5 years public nowing but its started in 2014 secret war in parlemantos and goverment functions

Russia is running out of missiles 2021 Russia is running out of missiles 2022 Russia is running out of missiles 2023 Russia is running out of missiles 2069

@etawil51

4 ай бұрын

attack numbers in rocket count is showing decreased amount 😉

@J--12

4 ай бұрын

Yep, still running out of them.

@etawil51

4 ай бұрын

@@J--12 running out means: number of rockets decreasing with time no one said it's 0 ... There is some sort of reproduction which is slow 🤷

@J--12

4 ай бұрын

@@etawil51 As if you counted, just stop puffin that copium.

@etawil51

4 ай бұрын

@@J--12 the number of Russia rocket strikes is counted by EU/USA/UKRAINE (I don't have to do it ) It's decreased by a milestone today than in 2022 ... We also see that mighty Russia needs support of Iran and N Korea 😏 to make any strikes at all possible... No one on earth has infinity number of rockets believing in it is just stupid but you can draw your self any type of alternative reality 😉

7 months later they fired 300 missiles in a day 😂😅 For how long we are going to lie

@patelpratik6803

7 ай бұрын

11 months later now they are using more than 500 drones per day 😂

@intellicadee

7 ай бұрын

1 year later Russia is still firing missled

@freak94able

4 ай бұрын

and another 7 months later they fired 300+missiles and 200+ drones in 4 days. They'll lie until they can't because Ukraine will be simply finished as a western proxy

@akshaynyaharkar

3 ай бұрын

@@iba24 😂🤣🥲 and now whole Europe is facing shortages

@Waseem_Amin

6 күн бұрын

but dont forget they runing out of missiles if you dont believe me ill tell you again next year lol

1:50 The guy who was standing on “the glass bridge” in Ukraine in that clip you showed. He survived that, and then kept on walking to work and went to work that day. He said all his friends at work thought he was nuts.

@IdoDekel-do7hh

Жыл бұрын

Chad.

@aarondermensch

Жыл бұрын

Pls the time of the clip

@Happyyyyyyyyyyy

Жыл бұрын

How the hell did he manage to get to work with those massive balls of his?!

@wloldyaandr.4814

Жыл бұрын

@@aarondermensch Dont know where that man but "glass bridge" is on 1:50

@johnnyloco970

Жыл бұрын

The woman on the other side of the bridge (bomb blast) dint waste any time to get away

The fact that this video was sponsored by Gaijin Entertainment is some top tier level of irony. I can already ear them explaining this to Russian officials: "It's not what you think".

@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent

Жыл бұрын

I think Gaijin and other gaming companies have fled or pretty much working outside of Russia now these days due to the bs that Russia has made them go through.

@andrefcnc

Жыл бұрын

@@SportyMabamba It's based in Hungary. But it's a Russian company nonetheless.

@RainbowBier

Жыл бұрын

they went to Hungary pretty early after the Invasion

@RRAAZZAA

Жыл бұрын

@@RainbowBier no they didn’t, they were working in Hungary before signs of invasion

@SANSd20

Жыл бұрын

@@RRAAZZAAKazuma He is talking about the first invasion in 2014. They didn't move to Budapest until 2015.

After almost a year, our rockets are still "running out."

@ignacio4159

3 ай бұрын

More like flying out

@raduprodan1011

3 ай бұрын

😂

@rykehuss3435

5 күн бұрын

okay naZi

8 months later and they're still running out of missiles...

Elon : "Nuclear war probability is rising rapidly" NWYT : Play war thunder

@NotWhatYouThink

Жыл бұрын

When life gives you lemons …

@stylinsandwich

Жыл бұрын

@@NotWhatYouThink gotta make that lemonade to make monies

@velox__

Жыл бұрын

Elon thinks he's such a genius for pointing out the obvious. can't wait for his irrelevancy.

@Nazubal

Жыл бұрын

exactly what I was thinking. Something terrifying then an immediately something fun.

@KrishNa-pc8it

Жыл бұрын

@@NotWhatYouThink 😅😂

2:05 kids playing in the crater caused by a missed that could have killed them is so telling of the innocence of children. They will probably remember years later playing in that crater

@pigboiii

Жыл бұрын

From what I have heard of people who lived through WW2 as kids in the Netherlands they will remember till they die, and indeed children dont realise the full connotation

@teamcybr8375

Жыл бұрын

Ring around the Rosie...

@arandomcommenter412

Жыл бұрын

@@teamcybr8375 A pockets full of posies

@nomore-constipation

Жыл бұрын

British version Ring-a-ring o' roses, A pocket full of posies, A-tishoo! A-tishoo! We all fall down American version Ring around the rosie, A pocket full of posies, Ashes! Ashes! We all fall down.

@hermanfurlong6752

Жыл бұрын

Why did you forget about the fifty men and women in the Ukraine that were locked in a building and set on fire and burned alive in the building! Why have you not had anything to say about the Ukrainian goverment now for 14 years shelling the Ukrainian citizens and killing men women children in their beds! You people care about nothing or no one but yourself!

This aged well.

@shannonbertram5513

3 ай бұрын

It all ages well lol if only the people who fall for the propaganda went back and watched it all lol

@Fuck_YT

3 ай бұрын

well it did... russia has to purchase artillery and missiles from north korea

@lexbroken8101

3 ай бұрын

@@Fuck_YT COOL STORY BRO.

@Fuck_YT

3 ай бұрын

@@lexbroken8101 no story. keep up with the war.

@glebb..3416

2 ай бұрын

​@@Fuck_YTRussia produces a lot on its own and also buys from drones from different countries.

9 months later, Russia is still running out of missiles.

When I was in Kharkiv, S-300 missiles were landing in the city every night. When an Iskander would hit a target it has a different sound that reverberates and makes a crazy sound.

@dr.bright3081

Жыл бұрын

Damn bro, that’s crazy. When were you there?

@zxwolf96

Жыл бұрын

While I'm like 100% sure you weren't lying about Iskanders making different noises from other missiles when they hit, isn't the S-300 a surface-to-air system? Edit: Nvm, watched the vid

@kitkat47chrysalis95

Жыл бұрын

@@zxwolf96 bro watch the video

@hartmutvonknallundzubumm9073

Жыл бұрын

@@zxwolf96 The S-300 has also a secondary ground attack mode, was used for example on civillian helper convoy in Zaporizhya.

@k0lliak553

Жыл бұрын

@@zxwolf96 S-300 is indeed an surface-to-air system that's capable of hitting ground targets. But why if Russia has better weapons anyways. Now i wonder if Ukraine tries to convince everyone that Russia has no missles, because something about what they said in the past doesn't matches up. They used to tell that "Russia hits civilians with S-300", and some of these claims were literally S-300 taking down Ukrainian missles, which ended blowing up in a city. Ukraine got called out on that. It's kinda like trying to convince everyone that Russia are complete clowns, maradeurs and war criminals, so Ukraine can cover up it's own frick-ups by pulling out the "Russia did this!!! Not us!!!" card.

The thing about terror bombing, like you describe, is that it historically doesn't work well against a determined enemy. Just see what the V1 and V2 bombings of London did during WW2.

@teamcybr8375

Жыл бұрын

Keep calm and carry on

@MarsStarcruiser

Жыл бұрын

Thank be to Werner for not perfecting rocket accuracy, till after he defected to US😅

@williamzk9083

Жыл бұрын

-Before the German V1 and V2 Reprisal weapons Bomber Command was given the "Area Bombardment Directive" in 1942 which targeted the geometric center of German cities (no specific target chosen) ion order to de-house and demoralize the population. Despite the neutral sanitized language was genuine terror carpet bombing since Bomber Command did not posses blind bombing aids of sufficient range and accuracy. Oboe was limited by radar horizon and number of aircraft that could be controlled and H2S didn't come in till latter with the early versions only effective in coastal cities with rivers and good water contrast. -The purpose of using the V1 and V2 was indeed terror but the rational was to use that as bargaining leverage to negotiate the mutual end of terror city bombing between Germany and Britain. -The V1 and V2 would have been inaccurate for about the first 9 months of their use and then more accurate guidance was scheduled. For the V2 SG-66 and vollzirkel offered 500m and 300m accruacy and for the V1 Ewald II about 500m or more. For the =winged V2 (A4b) 20m accuracy was expected using as system called Wasserspiegel. -One problem Ukraine has it has no weapons to hurt Russia. No nukes and no ATACMS. These should have been supplied from 2014 but we foolishly gave Putin another chance.

@thomasklein4265

Жыл бұрын

There not meant to win the war, there meant to pre occupy the Ukraine military while the main attacks are carried out with precision strikes, followed by ground forces finishing the job and sorry to say, it's working

@andruloni

Жыл бұрын

@@thomasklein4265 Where and when is it working? What are the symptoms of it working?

Yeah apparently they ran out of missiles in March but here we are

@eleventy-seven

Жыл бұрын

Lets hope the war ends soon. Slava Ukraini.

Those Russian missiles really are deadly accurate at hitting random stuff.

@user-cq1cw8xz7f

Жыл бұрын

They sure can hit a barn when fired from inside

@williamyoung9401

Жыл бұрын

Did you see this?! (13:58) A TRUE patriot missile. ;-) Get it? =P

@weeguy52

Жыл бұрын

Russia has the best tech in the world..it's fact that their tech is so advanced that they have boomerang missles,ships that catch fire and jets that fall from the sky😁

@austin2890

Жыл бұрын

@@weeguy52 yall are falling for western propaganda, Russia could simply run over Ukraine in a day if they wanted to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians in the wake. I'm not for Russia, but their military just isn't falling apart the way you think it is. They destroyed 30% of energy infrastructure in a day, in response to an attack on what they consider their territory, they could do it again. Any talk about their missile stockpiles is pure speculation too. It also would not be hard to restock on a couple hundred missiles (especially while their economy is doing better than it was before the sanctions). It is naive to think that Russia cannot manufacture their own microwave chips or get help from their close allies. The whole Ukrainian conflict is a lost cause and a money pit for the west, all that will come from continued fighting is more dead Ukrainian 20 year old men & despair for their mothers.

@weeguy52

Жыл бұрын

@@austin2890 and you have fallen for russian propaganda..no they can't as russia tried that at the start of the war and failed miserably now they have even less now..russia did use volleys of rockets most the time but now it's saving them for retaliation strikes such as crimea Bridge attack etc..true no one knows the stockpile of russia but if you are scavenging for parts then it's bad Now the reasons why russia has gained so little is(from what they made it out be) is because of there own blunders such has poor leadership,mistakes on the battlefield,poorly maintained hardware,logistical problems and corruption..russia is KINDA playing with the same rules too until their pride gets hurt again lol..russia has all the advantages and it struggling hence its threats to start WW3 or nuclear war because it's running low on alot of things It will take more than firing missiles to win this war..they only thing keeping russia in this fight is the threat of nukes and long range weaponry..russia can't keep this up indefinitely hence why the said there now open to negotiations but terms must be met first which ukraine has refused and why they've stopped exporting weapons/canceled weapon shipments and seeking more and more support from outside russia..yeah well russia caused this mess to begin with and tell that to the conscripts that russia is sending to the frontlines forcefully with their rusty AKs and old WW2 era tanks etc

9:06 Small error here. The Russian classification for this missile is Х-22, so, when translated to the English alphabet, it becomes Kh-22

@xiphoid2011

Жыл бұрын

correct, I was wondering what the hell is X-22. Then I googled it, oh, it's KH-22 or better known by the NATO callsign AS-4 "Kitchen". This is the large anti-ship missile originally intended to be carried by Badgers and Bears against US carrier battle groups during the cold war.

@Galaxy-oy4nj

Жыл бұрын

oh that explains it, i wondered since when USSR/Russia had put X in the name of their missiles

Almost a year later and Russia still running outta missiles.the media must think we’re slow or something 😂

@timbow614

Жыл бұрын

You may now guess why the Russians only shoot cheap dirt.

@staliniosifvissarionovich5588

9 ай бұрын

@@timbow614 no, they shot shovels.

@spencerson7516

7 ай бұрын

What do you expect from the media?

So.. they're running so low on ammo that they're resorting to essentially V2 strategy

@somehecucunt3194

Жыл бұрын

@crevis12

Жыл бұрын

V is for vengance

@williamzk9083

Жыл бұрын

@@crevis12 Vergeltungs translated more like reprisal or payback. In 1942 RAF Bomber Command had been issued the "Area Bombardment Directive" which involved bombing the geometric entree of German cities in order to "dehouse" and "demoralize" so it is terror carpet bombing in more emotive language. The idea was that the V1 and V2 would equally damage British cities such that a mutual end to city bombing could be negotiated. -von Braun had promised that the V2 would have 1 mil accuracy (1 part in a thousand ie 300m at 300km) which was a number that was half that artillery could achieve and better than high altitude or night bombing. Both the SG-66 and vollzirkel system that were to achieve this were well into testing when the war ended. One version the A4b could be guided on entry and was supposed to have 20m accuracy. von Braun begged for more time but was forced to go into production. -So essentially the V2 and V1 would have been used as carpet bombing weapons for 9 months or so until accurate guidance was phased in. This would also be allow the production system to build up. About 1000 month which would have lead to up to 5000 month eventually. This is more or less what the British did (and many argued against it). Of course the Russians have no excuse. Their civilian areas are not under attack so they have no excuse to use weapons that are so unreliable they cause collateral damage. There has never been significant historical morality in this.

@ZaHandle

Жыл бұрын

V is for victory

@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent

Жыл бұрын

Pretty much. Russia is losing the war, so they are opting for just level anything with a civilian in it and hope the civilians beg the leaders to surrender to end the slaughter. Problem is that as this war goes on and Russia continues to falter its likely that it will eventually introduce chemical or biological weapons or those of the nuclear variety in order to gain any type anything resembling a victory. They can win conventional but only if they re-organize the military fix and upgrade what they still have and re-train soldiers correctly but that takes time and money, which is something Russia no longer has.

Also, the latest gen missiles are very expensive to produce in large quantities. Going for very cheap drones & missiles from Iran & older soviet era missiles is a smart tactic even if they miss 50 % of the time.

@jackuzi8252

Жыл бұрын

As Joe Stalin said, "Quantity has a quality all its own". Accuracy becomes less important, if you have ENOUGH missiles. Why waste 10 cutting edge missiles when you could use 20 from 1962?

@alwynwatson6119

Жыл бұрын

Ukraine has been immune to all forms of missile attack for months now.

@Jake12220

Жыл бұрын

Well if a lot of the expensive missiles were getting shot down by expensive missile defence systems, the obvious tactic is to make them use up their defence stockpile by sending large numbers of cheap missiles and drones. Once their stockpile is depleted then its open skies for their expensive systems to strike whatever targets they like.

@hakunamatata1880

Жыл бұрын

@@jackuzi8252 If I remember correctly one interview with a general, 2 HIMARS batteries were as effective as 144 smerch missiles in hitting a targets like ammo depot. So it is not really 10 precise missiles vs 20 unprecise, more like 1 precise vs 12 unprecise. Add to that all the additional logistic strain of providing those unprecise missiles. Also additional disatvantage - you become war criminal in the eyes of the target. So even if you're not gonna get sentenced in Hague, you still can expect a Mossad style visit.

@marnixbrugmans4181

Жыл бұрын

@@jackuzi8252 but that's not how these calculations go. Example: you have 5 targets you want to hit. You want to estimate the chance 1 missile hits to understand how many you need to launch to almost certainly destroy the target. To calculate that chance, there are 3 factors: error rate (a malfunction in the missile), intercept rate and missile accuracy (expressed in CEP). So for an Iskander, let's say an error rate of 7% (quite optimistic), intercept of 2% and with a CEP of 5-7 meters you are confident you can hit the target (let's say it's a electric station, so quite big) These numbers would give a hit chance of 91%. As you want to make sure, you launch 2 for each target, so 10 missiles total for 99.2% hit chance per target. Now Kalibr. Same error rate and CEP, but 30% intercept. That gives you 65% per missile. To achieve 99% hit chance you're now launching 4 missiles per target, for a hit chance of 98.5% or 20 missiles in total. Now let's look at the older KH 55. Error rate is likely to go up, let's say 12.5% (still very conservative). Intercept stays the same but now the CEP of 20m means that you need to get at least 2 to impact to be fairly sure to destroy the target. You're now looking at a hit chance per missile of 30%. To get to around 99%, you would need 12 missiles per target to get a 98.5%, so 60 missiles total. So you're launching 6 times as many missiles. Once you start lowering your estimates further, the numbers get larger quickly. 25% procent error rate, 50% intercept and 20m CEP? 21 missiles per target. Same but with 70% intercept? 36 missiles per target. The really old stuff, from the 60's? Kh22 has a CEP of about 150m (best case, some sources claim way more). This alone means you need to have a ton of them to hit a 20m large target reliably (say 10, as the actual maths get really hard). Intercept should be lower, since they're supersonic (let's take 10%), but error right quite high (30%). That gives us 65 missiles per target to reach 98.5% chance of destruction, or 325 for the 5 targets mentioned...

8 months later they still have enough missiles

"Russia is Running Out of Missiles" ... this was 8 months ago, they are still saying the same! LOL!!

@GameC3nt

8 ай бұрын

u.s propaganda

@andrewsemenenko8826

6 ай бұрын

As a Ukrainian I can confirm - they are still running out of rockets😂

it's been 7 months..russia still firing missiles..🥵

Russia's precision guided missile stock seems to be as imaginary as their air force

@magnem1043

Жыл бұрын

dont be fooled, they save those by throwing cheap ass drones and for when anti air systems are suffering

@martonbalazskajari5587

Жыл бұрын

LOL

@sallytoothfuck

Жыл бұрын

Sources? There are non in this video, it’s all just anti Russian propaganda.

@joelott531

Жыл бұрын

Their airforce is great but their resources are tiny because half the planet and near to 90% of the world millitary is helping ukraine

@CM-ve1bz

Жыл бұрын

The Russian aircraft probably aren't that bad. The problem they have is they forgot to make smart munitions for them. They're flying billion dollar aircraft and dropping 10 dollar bombs. And for that reason they have to fly low and slow and they're getting their asses shot off.

1 month of Russia running out of missile.

War really does use backwards logic doesn't it.

@matthiasdarrington3271

Жыл бұрын

@@WontSeeReplies everything that doesn't suit your skewed world view is called western propaganda. Just be honest : It's not the Ukrainians who started this war, it's the tyrant sitting in his luxury villa built on corruption. This tyrant has a name, and it's Putin.

@Vincent_A.

Жыл бұрын

@@WontSeeReplies beep boop son, beep boop.

@arandomcommenter412

Жыл бұрын

@@WontSeeReplies 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

@ausriusdidziokas6771

Жыл бұрын

It’s called Russian propaganda. Another Putin can that uses same two words.

@goodguycarl

Жыл бұрын

It kind of seems like logic isn't a real concept anymore. Anyway, I'm not sure what's with those two talking about propaganda, they're both little lambs.

They're running out of missiles for 9 months already They must have a missile breeding program

Well a month later and they still haven't stopped, guess they're not running out THAT fast.

@arsyadidris6349

Жыл бұрын

There was a few months of quiet if im not mistaken, after the initial wave of missiles. That quiet period was probably the missile factory going overtime. I mean, alot of washing machines were stolen afterall😅😅

@BeraubtWerden

Жыл бұрын

The story of russia running out of missiles already exist since march 2022

@DuBaas007

Жыл бұрын

They're still producing more missles, so they will never run out, but they have ran low and the bombardements have slowed down/gotten smaller in scale.

Living in the Ukraine, it doesn’t seem to me that the title corresponds to reality. 🙂

Man I love the clip of the missile u-turning and heading right back where it came from. Beautiful irony.

@policemasta5220

Жыл бұрын

Ikr its so ironic

@dtrex2255

Жыл бұрын

I loved watching that 😂

@croftmanor2k23

Жыл бұрын

As much as I like this channel, it's actually a clip from Saudi Arabia. I hope he adds that to the video!

@NeputuniaNepp

Жыл бұрын

@@croftmanor2k23 source: it was revealed to me in a dream

@rog69

Жыл бұрын

@@NeputuniaNepp lol can’t google eh

14:00 instant karma. Looks like it came out of a cartoon

@fighter5583

Жыл бұрын

Wile E. and an ACME rocket.

This could be a very bad problem for everyone

@robert6437

Жыл бұрын

absolutely

@mohdnazreen5892

Жыл бұрын

relax

@hg1986

Жыл бұрын

Bloody Putin is a pain in the butt for everyone else on earth at this point. Well maybe except for Iran.

@mortem-tyrannis

Жыл бұрын

It will be, but that's what the politicians want. That's why there's zero talks of peace or Ukraine thinking they won't negotiate till Putin's out of office, yeah they want this war the new world order wants this war.

@mohdnazreen5892

Жыл бұрын

@Blue Penguin hey, relax

7 months later, they still runs out of missiles

7 months later they are still running out of missiles and just took Bakhmut with shovels.

@staliniosifvissarionovich5588

9 ай бұрын

lol

A year later Russia just launched the biggest missile attack

3 months later it is still "not what you think"😉

@KrolKaz

Жыл бұрын

Russia will run out of ammo any day now! You'll see 🫠

Man seeing those kids in the crater very sad stuff

@xponen

Жыл бұрын

I think they find the crater interesting.

@igor_pavlovich

Жыл бұрын

why? I've been in Iraq once, its a popular place for kids to play, often with unexploded rockets.

@brianworth3927

Жыл бұрын

on the face of it yes - but it is also a big f*k you to Russia - thanks for the new play area, you don't scare us kids, so no way you will intimidate our parents.

@barbarioli

Жыл бұрын

@@igor_pavlovich Both of those situation are very sad man😢

@mitotakjde9763

Жыл бұрын

@@hahah2495 pushing your weird beliefs like this is quite immature. It has nothing to do with race, people being endangered by invading country is bad in every situation, especially when the invading country is there to conquer the land that they have no right for.

Its 8 months later and they still seem to have a lot of rockets left. What happened?

@alestbest

18 күн бұрын

Again 9 monts

While Russia is running out of Missiles the American missiles are running out of America into Ukraine😂

Russia is so kind, They donated Military Equipment, Accepted Ukrainian Refugees and is now giving Fireworks to everyone! (Obv a joke)

@GiggityCrabbityGiggity

Жыл бұрын

💀💀💀💀💀

@ArgyleAuroraAurealis

Жыл бұрын

Wow Russia is so generous that they "delivered" ATGM missiles and tanks to Ukraine

@hamzamahmood9565

Жыл бұрын

Dude that's nothing compared to what he did for NATO. Also, forcing Europe to get rid of fossil fuels? Never forget that

@tim4570

Жыл бұрын

@@hamzamahmood9565 Nah fr a true environmentalist

@ahmetkopman4860

Жыл бұрын

@@ArgyleAuroraAurealis the, m in ATGM already means missle

That friendly fire at 14:00 was terrifying

@checkmate7745

Жыл бұрын

Such errors are normal in military

@toptiergaming6900

Жыл бұрын

Even the missiles don't feel like fighting the Ukranians anymore

@i.korol.v

Жыл бұрын

unfortunately, that was only anti-air missile. So it didn`t make a lot of dmg to the "sender"

@dmitriymiroshnik5841

Жыл бұрын

missile class: Surface - your face

2 month later still not run out

@shalitharukmal8268

Жыл бұрын

😅😅💯💯

@wallingnaga6563

Жыл бұрын

This video are the reason why propaganda videos exists !

7 months later, Russia is still running out of missiles

4:42 not even russia claims that kind of accuracy for the iskander. the best variant is supposed to have a 5-7m CEP (with satellite and optical guidance), with the worse variants having CEPs of 30-70m.

@theangrycheeto

Жыл бұрын

Slava 🇺🇦

@BluePhantomOG

Жыл бұрын

@@theangrycheeto no 😆

@christopherg2347

Жыл бұрын

@@BluePhantomOG Your love for imperalist torturers is sick.

@keydaaq1805

Жыл бұрын

@@BluePhantomOG cccp is the real new world order

@BluePhantomOG

Жыл бұрын

@@keydaaq1805 what do you mean???

"With every one hitting its target" (shows clip of pedestrian bridge being missed) I love the shade!

@njarlfhjulf

Жыл бұрын

What if the target was the ground. Then all missiles hit their target.

@Logarithm906

Жыл бұрын

The irony that Ukraine blew up the "most protected bridge in the world" and a major military supply line while the russians couldn't even take out a random pedestrian bridge... which has a glass floor along sections of it. But the russians will still drunkenly froth at the mouth that they're superior to the Ukrainians, completely ignorant of the fact that while the Ukrainian president is a comedian, it's the russians that are actually the butt of god's jokes, their collective delusion is what's entertaining. They can't even produce torniquets for their soldiers, a stripe of material and a stick, but they still think they're the 2nd best army in the world.

@jamielonsdale3018

Жыл бұрын

_Allegedly_ the target was an 'EU coordination centre located under the bridge, and the missile achieved a direct hit.' Remember that Russia still thinks that HIMARS looks like an apartment block...

@sjjsmsjsjsjsks

Жыл бұрын

@@njarlfhjulf well what's the target?

@americafirst3738

Жыл бұрын

It wasn't a "miss" genius, that one hit just in front of the UN office.... All the missiles hit their targets with what 11 civilian casualties? Smfh, Ukraine doesn't care about civilian deaths and neither did we in Iraq , Afghanistan etc... Stop drinking the WEF idiot juice and use some critical thinking skills

2 months after that, they launched like 120 missiles at once.

That boomerang rocket was hilarious

@TheBestPybro

Жыл бұрын

Bro literally said "nah I don't wanna"

Imagine if they put a warhead on a missile then it failed to launch and dropped down, friendly fire be like

@flaviomonteiro1414

Жыл бұрын

Given the state of their navy and air force... I'd be surprised if any nuclear warhead functions as planned...

@corbinglenn2567

Жыл бұрын

@@flaviomonteiro1414 idk I wouldn’t risk a nuclear missile failing

@TheTpointer

Жыл бұрын

@@flaviomonteiro1414 worst way to play russian rullete.

@crimson6391

Жыл бұрын

They would probably take checks before launching and if a defective missile is found they would probably scrap it

@alqaeda7040

Жыл бұрын

Imagine we suddenly hear about a nuclear explosion in Russia

14:00 Crew : "Go and kill some assholes!" Missile : "Say no more"

@michaeltheoret3842

Жыл бұрын

The footage of those two giant Russian missiles popping out of the launcher going up a few hundred feet then dropping straight back down was hilarious to me . Seeing Putin's " Purdy missiles" go to shit and crash makes me laugh. So much of Russia's Military hardware looks so beat up and held together with scrap BEFORE it even has any engagements with Ukrainian Soldiers. I heard something about so much of Russia's Military equipment is so corroded , old or poorly maintained . Maybe THAT'S why Russia is asking Iran for those drones and missiles . Pretty sad to pick a fight and then beg for help from others because the one who started the fight is getting Their ASS kicked .

@rog69

Жыл бұрын

@@michaeltheoret3842 right. Just like Ukraine been begging for help since 2014 😂. And nice ur very well versed in propaganda and old fail videos from like decades ago 😂 pls keep the cope flowing, I’m sure this war touches u personally 🤡

@saul_goodman6246

Жыл бұрын

@@rog69 you sound angry , go puff some copium with the russians , they have plenty of it 😁

@panzerblitz2140

Жыл бұрын

@@rog69 example of a Russian bot after he's been drinking more diesel fuel than usual ^^^^

@rog69

Жыл бұрын

@@saul_goodman6246 really, angry? 😂 how did u make that out kid? run along puss u don’t belong in here, gotta get back to CoD vids

2 month later, Russia is still running out of missile 😐

1 year already, the Russian still run out of missile

@icekidtvshorts4504

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

Born 14 May 1962 i certainly don't function as well as i did decades ago. my misfire rate is close to 100% !:-)

@flexinclouds

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@mdj.6179

Жыл бұрын

Yep

@didier2008

Жыл бұрын

Born 16 july 1960

man i just really appreciate your content, short form or long form they are very informational with good writing too, even sources! keep it up man

@glebb..3416

2 ай бұрын

Seems like this video aged like milk, Russia still isnt running out of rockets...

This aged like milk

Russia is running out of missiles? Damn that's the 28th time I'm hearing this news since the war started

@castlewhale4746

Жыл бұрын

It's almost like there is a difference between "is running out" and "has already run out". The first is an ongoing process, the second is a completed process. They are in the process of running out because they no longer have access to many of the foreign electronics and other parts they use to build their missiles due to sanctions that specifically block their access to those parts. They had a large stockpile of missiles and the parts/electronics needed to build more before the war, therefore they have been able to replace some of the missiles they have been using, but are running out of those parts/electronics because they are using their finite reserves and have been sanctioned from buying any more. If you can't replace something you only have a finite amount of and are using in high quantities, one could say you are running out, even if that process of running out is a slow and stretched out one. When people say "Russia is running out of missiles" they don't mean that Russia will have 0 missiles left in a couple weeks from now; that's the point where Russia HAS run out of missiles.

@jontobin5942

Жыл бұрын

They will always be running out and never completely out because as you deplete a critical resource to your war effort you become less cavalier about depleting it further. Obviously. Has any war in history ever destroyed or depleted every round of ammo on one side? No but certain munitions were still identified as running out. This isn't an RTS game where the rule set and resources are fixed from the start and you better use it or lose it. Both sides will adapt and modify their strategy to accommodate logistics. Russia will never completely deplete their reserves of missiles. They'll give up before that because the war in Ukraine would have severely deteriorate their readiness for other geopolitical contingencies at that point. Your observation is brain-dead from someone with a high school understanding of war.

@sooryan_1018

Жыл бұрын

@@jontobin5942 Good argument Unfortunately, your mom

@jontobin5942

Жыл бұрын

@@sooryan_1018 Brilliant rebuttal. I have to concede after that. If only I'd thought of,..my mom.

@dudenamedecho

Жыл бұрын

@@castlewhale4746 they have been running out for months and will be running out next year too apparently

To place things in perspective of the different bar in the standards used by both sides: HIMARS munition including ATACAMS is considered by US Army as "near precision" weapons, in part due that they are basically "smart" rockets. The new successor of the ATACMS, the PrSM (Precision Strike Missile) does earn that name. Note also that it is called now a "missile": this means more electronics and thus "brains". The much higher precision and range compensates its smaller size (2 units per loader vs 1 ATACMs) and smaller warhead.

@michaelswagson4457

Жыл бұрын

Why is everybody so fucking obsessed with ATACMS? Its just a quasi SRBM, that is nothing special in comparison to other systems of its class.

@alwynwatson6119

Жыл бұрын

Russian missiles completely lost the ability to reach the ground when the new world order finished its laser point defence system. Also evry russian satellite has been destroyed.

@undercore2677

Жыл бұрын

@@michaelswagson4457 because people know what they are so it makes it easier to understand whats being said

@michaelswagson4457

Жыл бұрын

@@undercore2677 atacms is actually a kinda unusual weapon that sits in between ballistic missile and classic mlrs. So its a weird choice for explanatory purposes.

@kairatkempirbaev7183

Жыл бұрын

Can electronic warfare nullify all gains from those "high precision" munitions?

Arestovich has been saying that russia was running out of missiles since february. 6 months into the war he literally said that russia is almost spent. I believe russia is actually hoarding their missiles for possible escalation with nato, thus the switch to the drone attacks. The geran drones in contrast, are very cheap and very destructive. It is used on stationary targets, unlike lancet drones which can be controlled (an actual loitering munition, which the geran isn't) Ukrane is running out of anti air missiles, as demonstrated after the strikes in october 10th and after, to which they are shooting down the drones with guns (lots of videos of it and some western media reported this also). Which rarely managed to take it out, and when it did, it often got derailed and hit destroy the object nearby, sometimes even killing the shooters and destroying civilian infrastructure.

@pieterlindeque7798

Жыл бұрын

These idiots have been saying the same shit for half a year and literally nothing has changed in reality.

@yaboyed5779

Жыл бұрын

I mean why use a multi million dollar missile that can be intercepted when you can use a 10 thousand dollar drone to do the job.

@SirMarq

Жыл бұрын

My toughts exactly. Using decades old soviet missles is good idea, to rain terror on enemy and destroy infrastructure. Why use modern missles? It would be smart to keep set stockpile of Iskanders, and use just surplus of Iskanders.

@Replika2000

Жыл бұрын

No one really knows the amount of weapons Russia produced and stocked somewhere in their huge country. No one really knows how many of theese weapons Russia can produce on a daily base. No one really knows how sanctions affect producing theese weapons. Surely the propaganda war hits whatever side you want to listen to. What we have yet to see is Russia using 3, 5 and 9t bombs dumped from Tu-22 from a 100km distance like Iraqis did...

@yaboyed5779

Жыл бұрын

@@Replika2000 well damn that’d be something

2040 it's still running out 💀

It's 16 July 2023 Russia is still Running out of Missiles.,...........😅

God I'd never thought of that - what if Russia is trading Iranian assistance for nukes... Right now I wouldn't put it past them. So here we have yet ANOTHER flashpoint for the first significant nuclear exchanges (allegedly the Saudis have a warhead of their own held and managed on their behalf by Pakistan according to different rumours). I was getting worried there that I was sleeping too well at night, should help bring back those lovely nightmares.

@feedingravens

Жыл бұрын

Must not be Pakistan alone - think about all the top secret documents Trump stole. Think about Trump defending Bonesaw MBS when he let US resident Khashoggi be sawn to pieces, Think about Trump making a deal in 2019 with the Saudis so that Raytheon can built top-notch high-tech weapons in Saudi Arabia. Think about Bonesaw MBS forcing Qatar to grant Jared Kushner a 1 billion dollar loan for his 666 5th Avenue building. Think about Bonesaw MBS giving two more billions to Jared after Trump left the WH. And regarding Pakistan - Trump sent Pompeo to force Pakistan to free the leading taliban and 5000 more fighters that the Pakistanis had held captive. I think Pompeo met in Saudi Arabia with these leaders, and they arranged that when they hold still against Trump's troops now, Trump promises that the US will leave Afghanistan in May 2021 (or so).

@davocc2405

Жыл бұрын

@@feedingravens I don't think Trump has quite that much influence or actual control; the problem with many if these claims is that it paints him as being significantly more effective (or even engaged) than he was. This is a guy who couldn't even take on mid sized social media operations in his own country... I just don't see it.

@DiscoDashco

Жыл бұрын

Also, Trump is not in office anymore, and the Biden administration made sure that as many of the fixers working toward the goal of formalizing the old JCPOA (before it was scuttled by Trump) got back on that job asap to rekindle talks with Iran.

@evryatis9231

Жыл бұрын

Iran already has nukes. It would have been invaded long ago otherwise

@odaigassan5330

Жыл бұрын

Lol ICBM for drones Thought don't think that iran seek nukes cuz they religionlly prohibited it 🤦‍♂️

How do you know? How is this even in your level of expertise? Do you have access to the Russian inventory numbers?

“Here’s why the Russian Missile shortage isn’t just Western propaganda: According to Ukranian intel…” 😂

@-lone5378

7 ай бұрын

Says it all lmao

Todays forecast in Kieve 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

The footage at 5:53 is from today, love to see creators keeping their videos updated hours before the upload, great job 👍🏻

@Gizmos_and_stuff

Жыл бұрын

yeah good to see them staying up to date

It was what I thought. They are running due to how less accurate they were becoming

@fakeit6339

Жыл бұрын

Iranian drones are more precise and cheaper and their cameras don't lie plus the noise they are making interferes with radars signals which makes them penetrate defense systems

@ryanthompson5761

Жыл бұрын

@@fakeit6339 Why is it when i think of Iran i think of the F313??

@questionmaker5666

Жыл бұрын

@@fakeit6339 Radar uses radio radiation to detect targets not sound. It is simply their small size and low-speed which is problematic for radar. Acoustic sensors might be able to pick the drones up though.

@joshuaespinoza8325

Жыл бұрын

@@questionmaker5666 thats a can of worms. Radio waves are part of the electro magnetic spectrum caused by fuckin space magic. Is light a wave? Is it a particle? BOTH? NEITHER?! Its weird to think of radiowaves as light, but i guess it is.

@worldspam5682

Жыл бұрын

@@fakeit6339 lmao imagine interfering radars by Cardy b songs. Next gen rusia tech.

It's december 25, 2023. The SMO still goes on, ukroreich still loses their territories and i guess we still are running out of those missiles.

There's a difference between running low and preserving them because they cost much and their targets are not cost effective

@starblazer6907

Жыл бұрын

This channel is pretty much just western propaganda at this point, I wonder if he'll make a video about how Russia is bankrupting the West by using dirt cheap drones that can only be countered by super expensive missiles/defenses produced by the West to counter much more sophisticated systems.

@thetipsymankey

Жыл бұрын

1 week later !!!

@u.h.h4915

Жыл бұрын

✨💛🙏🏻💙✨

@Eadric_The_Wild

Жыл бұрын

​​​@@KyPc0p Yes, Russia is running out of missiles. Last week, Russia launched an anti-aircraft carrier missile at a civilian apartment block in Ukraine. If Russia isn't running out of missiles, why are they launching anti-aircraft carrier missiles at civilian targets? Russia is clearly using any missiles they can find. That's why Russia is also using missiles that were originally designed to carry nuclear weapons. The Russian military is desperately scrambling to acquire missiles, even dissambling their nuclear weapons just so they can re-use the missiles by replacing the nuclear warhead with a conventional explosive and using extremely expensive, low quantity and inaccurate anti-aicraft carrier missiles to destroy land targets. Russia is losing, my friend. Ukraine has already regained most of the land that was annexed by Russia. It's only a matter of time before the Ukrainian army liberates the rest of their territory. Ukraine will launch a counter-offensive in spring with all their new NATO MBTs, IFVs and APCs and take back another huge chunk of territory. It's over for Russia. btw, "Running out" doesn't mean the same thing as "Run out". Nobody said that Russia had no missiles left. Nobody said that Russia was about to imminently run out of missiles. They simply said that Russia is running out of missiles i.e Russia is running low on missiles and will eventually run out of them at some point.

@Eadric_The_Wild

Жыл бұрын

@@KyPc0p It's pointless arguing with vatniks. I'll reply to you again so we can continue this discussion after the spring counter-offensive when Ukraine regains yet another massive chunk of their land. Maybe then you'll finally see reason and accept the fact that Russia is losing. Russia has no equipment, no morale, no production of tanks and barely any training. How do you expect Russian soldiers to beat Ukrainians that are trained and armed by NATO? Russian soldiers don't even have nightvision goggles while Ukraine received 10,000 sets of night vision goggles from Canada alone. I've seen videos of Ukrainians using night vision to clear Russian trenches at night and the Russians can't do anything about it because they don't have night vision. That's a microcosm of what's happening in this war. Ukriane has superior morale, superior training, superior weapons, superior vehicles, and superior equipment and the Russian army has no counter to it. That's why the Russian army was pushed back all the way to the Donbass. It's hilarious how Russians are hailing Soledar as this great victory lmao. It's a strategically unimportant town with a pre-war population of 10,000 people. More Russian soldiers have been killed in Soledar than Ukrianian soldiers, remember that the attackers (Russia) usually take 3 times more casualties than the defenders (Ukraine). And I know you're going to say "if it's not an important town then why is Ukraine still defending it?" And the answer is because it's a meat grinder. Why would Ukraine give it up? In Soledar and Bakhmut, Ukrainians are able to kill wave after wave of Russians while taking a fraction of the casualties themselves. How do you justify Russian human wave attacks and Wagner PMC using convicted pedophiles, rapists and murderers? Like, you know you're the bad guys, right?

"Russia is running out of precision missiles." "So they're using non precision missiles?" "Yep" "Wait.. when?" "Right now" "I thought they were using precision missiles on us" "Nope"

@glebb..3416

2 ай бұрын

Russia run out of rockets

I'm Ukrainian, living in Kyiv. During the last two weeks, I woke up at least two times to explosions nearby (~0.7-2km). I want to comment on the notion at 13:20. You said russian terror could drive up panic, pushing Kyiv to the peace talk. In fact, it works exactly the opposite way, uniting us (Ukrainians) even harder. For example, take one of the recent cases of a massive rocket attack on October 10th. As soon as we started experiencing this, our volunteering funds (which help our army) started crowdfunding campaigns for new equipment for soldiers. And guess what? Just one of them collected around $10 000 000 in 48 hours. That's, by the way, in a country where an average annual net income is about $6000. So I don't think that russian terror can break our resistance!

@HingleMacCringleberry

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, putin knows his options are limited so he resorts to terror against hardened and resilient Ukrainians. Giving an inch of land to Putin is not an option and sets a bad precedent to both Putin and China’s president Xi who wants to do the same to Taiwan. I’d bet China’s actions or hopefully inaction will be determined on how this war goes.

@HingleMacCringleberry

Жыл бұрын

@bob bobber so much winning with all those Russians retreating. Russian life will be challenging for decades with all these sanctions.

@Sunark

Жыл бұрын

your resistance may remain intact but what about the country itself

@kwhp1507

Жыл бұрын

6000$ a year, really? How do people survive? I can’t imagine rent and other cost are that much cheaper than they are here in the US.

@HingleMacCringleberry

Жыл бұрын

@@Sunark remove mines and rebuild. Then, celebrate Putin’s☠️⚰️

Russia when a few of their nukes “accidentally” get mixed up with the others: 😱

It was said a year ago they were running out

Iran - first time? Russia - no but this big yes first

@mikloscsuvar6097

Жыл бұрын

That was a very cute scene with two adult men. 😀

Ok the fact that they got footage for ALL THE MISSILES, AMMO, VEHICLES IS INSANE like how did you get all that info

@Wndrfl7

Жыл бұрын

Called Internet my guy

@oliverduke1173

Жыл бұрын

it was filmed for a reason. it was broadcast for a reason. Think what was not filmed, and what was filmed but not broadcast?

@SportyMabamba

Жыл бұрын

Open Source Intelligence (aka someone published it, and it gets hoovered up).

@archingelus

Жыл бұрын

@@oliverduke1173 just exactly like why you write this has a reason i assume

8 months later and Russia is still firing missiles, some of them just crippled the port of Odessa, disrupting the grain shipments. I'm not going to stop lol.

Bro, the numbers Ukraine gave don't even make sense. Ukraine claimed that Russia had 444 air-launched cruise missiles before the start of the war...so how do they explain them having launched 719 of them as of May 13th, 2023 (according to official Ukrainian data)? And what happened to the 575 ex-soviet Kh-55SMs Russia bought from Ukraine in April of '99?

After this video was uploaded, they started attacking very often. Something like once a week (sometimes every two weeks). We were sitting half or often more of every day without electricity (there was a schedule of power cuts, and different houses had their own), but real blackout only happened once, and lasted no longer than 2 days. By blackout i mean that whole of Ukraine didn't have electricity, while usually there just was not enough electricity, so, only part of houses were affected. Regarding rate of shot down rockets - it's indeed now bigger than 90%

When you heavily rely on shock and awe to the point your *"guided missiles"* keep hitting whatever they want to hit

@kuskusdikus6014

Жыл бұрын

Thats america.

@alexlabs4858

Жыл бұрын

That’s the worry about tactical nukes. They don’t have to be accurate. It’s the shock value of “oh shoot this dude is nuts enough to use his nukes.”

Bombarding civilian targets has only ever increased the determination of the civilian populace to endure. This has been seen countless times in countless wars ever since 'terror bombing' became a thing. Sieging is a different story as the goal there is to essentially starve the population into submission as they have no escape or enduring it and death is certain.

@hamzamahmood9565

Жыл бұрын

What's more is that Russians are terror bombing Kiev and Western Ukraine, regions that HATE them the most. This will only result in more civilians signing up for military service.

@LtKillerSAS

Жыл бұрын

Didn't seem to have the same effect on the Germans in WW2 when mass bombing of their cites and infrastructure crippled them and the will to fight, or the Japanese's when two atomic bombs where dropped on their main cites. Mass bombing and terror can work. Though both of these examples are on countries that where in the losing stages of the war. I think if Russia was to drop a few tac nukes in and around Ukraine, that terror would become very real very fast for many. Lets hope it doesn't come to that.

@Cragified

Жыл бұрын

@@LtKillerSAS The strategic bombing on Germany only strengthened the German resolve to commit to their defense. Also due to the distributed economy it did not have a huge impact on their ability to produce material except in a few cases. What it mainly accomplished was depleting the Luftwaffe and force a lot of production towards AAA. The firebombing of Tokyo has little effect on civilian morale in Japan. And the atomic weapons would have been the same if the emperor had not decided the complete destruction of Japan was not worth it and surrendered.

@Jake12220

Жыл бұрын

it depends on what the aim is. Terror bombing has always failed, but this makes much more sense if Russia is simply using cheap weapons to deplete the Ukrainian missile defence systems. Why send multimillion dollar weapons that keep getting shot down when you can send relatively cheap ones till they run out of the multimillion dollar missiles they use to shoot them down? Once the missile defence systems run out of missiles Russia can use their expensive ones with near impunity. Not saying this is a good thing, just pointing out how you need to look at the situation from different angles. If l was playing a strategy game in this situation these are the tactics l would be using. Ukraine has to try to shoot down whatever is sent, even though they know they have a limited supply of the defence missiles, it's putting them between a rock and a hard place while costing Russia very little.

@youareliedtobythemedia

Жыл бұрын

@@LtKillerSAS terror bombing Germany did nothing to morale. It was the destruction of infrastructure relevant for the war that lead to something. Like railroads, factories,...

8 months later, " Russia almost out of missiles fo real this time."

But if you have thousands of non-precise missiles, I’d argue that’s better than having a very small number of guided missiles

It's very unlikely that Ukraine will have peace talks before Russia is pushed out. There is massive support inside the country and because of the many atrocities committed by Russia, the support is very high in the west as well.

@Wndrfl7

Жыл бұрын

Peace talks for the invaders of your land? Hell no, they are going to regret all the losses Ukraine suffers

@ausriusdidziokas6771

Жыл бұрын

Russia will regret from the bigger loses it suffered from starting the war.

@apennameandthata2017

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. Terror bombing increases resolve. Then why do it? It is to make the Russian people think that something is being done. It is for domestic consumption.

@denarte6986

Жыл бұрын

According to you mr. Bot? Nobody i know wants to have talks with occupiers. There is no ‘Massive support’ that you speak of.

@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent

Жыл бұрын

@@Wndrfl7 Gotta remember Ukraine does not have the manpower or weapons capable of invading Russia and taking ground. Negotiations would be the correct line in this. However gotta understand that Russia wants peace talks as well. With them demanding terms well Ukraine quietly hands itself over to russia under the barrel of a tank. Well there maybe people calling for negotiations everyone kinda has it figured already that Putin has no intentions of letting Ukraine go unless he takes chunks out of it, decimates its government or nukes it off the face of the Earth. Ukraine is going to continue fighting to when it either forces Russia to give up, or when there is nothing else left and eventually goes down fighting. As both would show how weakened and embarrassing Russia had become.

In the just one video you're simultaneously told that Ukraine has many S-300 used for interception with 70-50% success. It means 30-50% of S-300 launched hit somewhere other than targets. And at the same time, Russians for some unspecified reason are going out of their way to convert their S-300s exclusively to strike random civilian buildings.

@zjifzmifzukjtrzjghuk

Жыл бұрын

I guess they are more useful in AA task than, g2g tasks. If the facts statet are all correct

@harb1911

Жыл бұрын

nothing new here, western propaganda machine contradicts itself. those S300 you're talking about are very old and their missiles are good only for decommission, same goes with BUK and OSA systems. you see zelensky and his thugs don't care about their own civs and they place those systems inside populated areas of their own cities despite prohibition of such practices so as result you have SAM missiles hitting buildings from time to time because NATO flying radars who serve as guidance don't see them. so western propaganda has nothing other than selling this myth to all of you as "russkis started using SAM missiles against ukrainean ground targets" and this sort of blah-blah. in a couple of years you guys will have to think a lot about your govt and the media after most of the truth will get on surface. this is inevitable. it happened before it will happen this time. and if it is someone be worried about ammunition stock pile depleting that is US and his NATO satellites. if you are capable to do a proper google-search you can easily find info about this.

@arsyadidris6349

Жыл бұрын

This is purely a generalization,, Shooting smthing in the air is different from shooting smthing on the ground. Acquiring n locking on to an aerial target require fast computer reaction to track the target. Acquiring n locking on to a ground target dont require fast computer reaction, but the ability to identify the target in the first place, and filter out everything else around the target. Or, of course, u can just plug in a coordinate and godspeed. But that also means its practically a “dumb” missile, with no built in software to avoid incoming anti missile missiles. Coz u know, the S300 IS the antimissile missile. Its not doing what its suppose to do. Sure, maybe abit of software tweaking but still. As for the boom itself, S300 do pack a punch,,, but just not as punchy as an actual cruise missile. Warhead weight is under 150kg. Which might seem alot, until u know that the average cruise or antiship missile are packing 300-500kg warheads.

@yaboyed5779

Жыл бұрын

@@arsyadidris6349 I mean the craters in Poland were really huge.

@arsyadidris6349

Жыл бұрын

@@yaboyed5779 wont deny its huge, but a true cruise missile with half-tonne warhead can completely level something as big as the statue of liberty.

2 Months later .. Russia is indeed running out of missiles

Imagine just seeing the missile you just fired come swinging back at you

@B01

Жыл бұрын

I can't imagine them taking so long to decide to GTFO of there🤣

@gbladewarrior6884

Жыл бұрын

That's probably American spies sabotaging Russian factories, the missile failures are way to obvious and the failure rate is high not to be intentional.

@Antimonious

Жыл бұрын

That was in South Korea

@ElRabito

Жыл бұрын

Only in Nazi Russia 🤣

@joemamaobama6863

Жыл бұрын

@@Antimonious it was in luhansk

10:53 damn i through for a moment this guy packs a sniper and wants to 360 noscope the drone

@teastroyer2812

Жыл бұрын

@Christian Haley yeah but it's no sniper battle, you can see the guy spinning in a circle before before seemingly lining up for a shot, but its's just a camera stand😂

2023: Russia is running out of missiles 2024: Russia is running out of missiles 6969: Russia is running out of missiles 250,000,000AD: Russia is running out of missiles.

Since the second week of the war, I've been hearing Russia is running out of missiles, it's been months and they are still running out of missiles 🤣🤣🤣

At 13:57 what is described as a missile that failed to detonate is I believe, the tail section of a Russian 300 mm rocket that has already dispersed its cluster bomblets. Many of these have been shown in news reports from Ukraine, and they seem to often land like this, burying their nose in the earth, leaving the tail fins sticking up. In all likelihood it has already done its gruesome job.

@JC130676

Жыл бұрын

The fact that Russia is using cluster munitions on civilian targets shows they are barbarians that have no respect for the Geneva convention. Russia is finally showing its true nature to the world.

@patricknorton5788

Жыл бұрын

@@JC130676 well, I'm not sure if they're just being revealed now, but I'm not a fan of this Russian regime. Or the last one. Or the one before that either I suppose. Hmm.

@V-V1875-h

Жыл бұрын

Yes, most of the back parts of the rockets you find sticking out of the ground are expended cluster munitions

@i.korol.v

Жыл бұрын

it is a "booster" part, as i know.

One small fact is the missile debris had a manufaction dataplate of only 3 month before its usage.

@jackuzi8252

Жыл бұрын

That's the thing about sanctioning chips. If the Russians only need electronics available in the commercial marketplace, they can send people to Hong Kong, Istanbul or elsewhere and just buy up suitcases full to bring back.

@Jake12220

Жыл бұрын

given an ICBM only required the processing power of a PlayStation 2 it's likely even the most advanced missiles they are using don't require cutting edge technology. They can probably get all the chips they need from the Chinese and Indian companies that strip used electronics for parts.

@SirMarq

Жыл бұрын

@@Jake12220 Taiwan produces majority of chips in the world, so, no problem for russians to buy from china some electronics

@The_ZeroLine

Жыл бұрын

They need more from the West than just microchips. The media is just too stupid to get into all the other parts required from the west that cannot just be purchased by a guy going to Hong Kong.

@jackuzi8252

Жыл бұрын

@@The_ZeroLine What are these other parts? I'm sure they're easier to produce domestically or buy from China than chips.

I like how everything Ukraine says is reported as fact and never questioned, even > 90% success rate of their air defences.

@Padgriffin

10 ай бұрын

They reported that S300/Buk systems have ~80% success while the western IRIS-T had ~90%, which is in line with what we already knew about those systems.

@roots4x

10 ай бұрын

I am rooting for Ukraine, but the sheer amount of Ukrainian war propaganda is staggering. It's a made a bunch of young liberals into pro war crazies. I see supposed compassionate people cheering on the deaths of Russian foot soldiers. These are the same people who claim they wouldn't have owned slaves or been racist in the antebellum South. But I guess we were all stupid once. Whenever I tell them most of them will eventually turn into conservatives, they blow up.

@70newlife

10 ай бұрын

​@@PadgriffinS300 and Buk are old soviet versions. In Ukranian hands old versions are accurate. But in Russian hands they become inaccurate😂😂 The level of stupidity shown by western people is amazing!! . Patriot systems couldn't prevent Houti Drones in Saudi Arabia. But Ukraine has a 90% hit rate!! Those old S300 not serviced for 40 years have in hands if the corrupt Ukraine state Ukraine and Russia started out at same time. Donbass part had heavy military manufacturing and heavy industrialization than Russia. On the Start of hostilities in feb 2022. Ukraine's Percapita GDP was $3200 lower than Uganda and Russias was $11500. Russia launches satellites, it supplies ISS reliably which US can't. Yet you feel Ukraine with 40 year old soviet weapons has more accuracy than Russia? You got to be a bit weak in the head to believe that. Oh by the way chips used in military, petrochemicals plants etc are not the same ones used in consumer electronics. They are built to withstand different standards of vibration, heat, cold and EW interference. They are easily made in old semiconductor fabs which Russia has enough. Plus one doesn't need to hack microwaves. You can easily pick up a Few thousand chips every month from companies manufacturing microwaves in China, Thailand, Malaysia Philippines, Vietnam etc . As usual Americans show their lack of knowledge of how the world works..

@gamingclipz7309

9 ай бұрын

I like how u defend Russia even tho it’s fully of scums! Btw enjoy the gift 😂. Use a vpn buddy

2 months later Russia is Running out of missile and Holding war still

This was one of your best and most informative videos yet. Love the Ukraine war coverage

@apennameandthata2017

Жыл бұрын

It was WRONG

@jaysonjay7852

Жыл бұрын

🐑

@NeputuniaNepp

Жыл бұрын

@@jaysonjay7852 🤡

@TheBooban

Жыл бұрын

It is also Ukrainian propaganda. They definitely are not intercepting that many either.

@NeputuniaNepp

Жыл бұрын

@@TheBooban Source: I made it the fuck up

Quick note: no missile is easy to intercept, and the low altitudes subsonic cruise missiles fly at can make them arguably more difficult to intercept than high flying ballistic missiles

@worldspam5682

Жыл бұрын

nah, they are getting intercepted by mobile manpads crews. The same thing with planes, helicopters and drones. The only advantage is ability to change their course midflight.

@drfelren

Жыл бұрын

I can't blame you for not understanding rocket science, but subsonic cruise missiles are much, much, much easier to intercept than ballistic missiles. Like the previous reply noted, cruise missiles have been shot down using MANPADS .. a missile flying 50km in the sky at Mach 6 is very much more difficult to shoot down. If you still don't believe me, the intercept rate discrepancy tells the story.

@williamzk9083

Жыл бұрын

I think we have the technology. Take the German MANTIS system which was designed as a CIWS close in weapons system with a range of 3km to protect Luftwaffe Airbases. It is a 35mm gun firing AHEAD ammunition in a fancy turret with the required precision radar. It can be fitted in modified form to AFV like the BOXER. The software and radar exists. A battery of MANTIS is 6 guns. Place them 3km apart in a circle and one can protect a space of diameter 6km though a tighter spacing might be more realistic. -The problem is no one has built and invested in these systems in sufficient quantity. Part of the reason is cost but cost comes down when ordered in quantity. This at least takes care of drones and weaving subsonic cruise missiles over cities and will likely handle, to some degree, missiles up to Mach 3. -Missiles such as IRIS-T and SkySabre launch vertically and lock on to target after launch when they are close to target. The directing radar can be 20km away and more than one radar can be used. The problem with these missiles is cost for certain kinds of target. MANPAPDS still need to be pointed at the target. The solution could be something like the German LFK NG missile basically a mini IRIS-T of only 28kg with a range of 10km that has lock on after launch capability. A radar like the elevated "Giraff" or a radar in a drone can pick up these targets. -There are other possibilities. 76.2mm canon with guided projectiles have long been in use. The USN is now introducing guided 57mm projectiles (MAD FIRE) and it's likely the technology will move to 50mm, 40mm and 35mm to as small as 20mm. This would allow a 35mm gun to engage accurately and with precision to 5km or more. -There are also some interesting guns like a 30mm recoliless autocanon Rheinmetall made which has a muzzle velocity of 1200ms yet weighs only 100kg. The driving motivation was accuracy on Tiger helicopters but it can be mounted on top of a 10m erectile mast (eg u-boats) to clear terrain. -Problem is although systems exist they don't exist in quantity.

@Fhcghcg1

Жыл бұрын

@@drfelren In order to shoot down a cruise you first need to spot it. Due to them flying close to the ground, going to be flying below most radar installations. The missile could be easily detected by eye, but it would be hard to tell what it is, where it’s going, and communicate the information to relevant systems. The missile is also still going ~1000 kmh which is in no way slow, complicating detection and communication. Stingers have very bad range, meaning you have to have large amounts of soldiers scattered all across large portions of the country. The short range also means you have a very short window to fire the stinger (remember, the missile is going ~1000kmh) causing soldiers to have to be manning these stingers 24/7 as there is little time to react. These issues are further made worse by the fact that unless you have your stinger-men very densely packed, the cruise missile will likely not fly directly overhead making interception even more difficult. Any ManPADS that shoots down a cruise missile is only a lucky hit and is in no way easily reproducible. Compare this with shooting down a SRBM. The high altitude means any competent SAM site could detect it. The SAM site could then immediately fire an intercepter. The long range of these SAM systems means you need very few of them. The high speed of the ballistic missile does add some complications but it’s not much harder than bunting a baseball. Missiles are hard to hit. Intercepting cruise missiles and ballistic missiles both come with a unique set of challenges, and with a lot of unique situations and factors, it is ARGUABLY more difficult to intercept cruise missiles in many situations. I don’t know whether you read these blocks of text Steven Reynolds, but don’t treat me like an idiot.

@drfelren

Жыл бұрын

@@Fhcghcg1 My apologies if I offended you, I am merely trying to provide insight. Firstly, these cruise missiles are almost entirely shot from the Black Sea or Russian/Belarusian territory hundreds if not thousands of kilometers out giving sufficient time to recognize, communicate, and react to the oncoming barrage. Subsonic speeds are relatively slow for a missile especially if it is know where they are coming from. Secondly, while I agree MANPADS do not have the range optimal for intercepting missiles, there are thousands of them all throughout Ukraine. Lastly, very few systems can intercept ballistic missiles, whereas even MANPADS can intercept cruise missiles in the right circumstance. Intercepting a ballistic missile is much harder than intercepting a cruise missile or we would have seen it done more often - relative to the over 50% success rate of intercepting cruise missiles. I would like to highlight the inconsistency in your statements "no missile is easy to intercept" "the ballistic missile does add some complications but it’s not much harder than bunting a baseball." Again I am sorry if I offend you and I honestly do want you to gain something from our conversation.

We've been running out of missiles for 8 months now. Still kicking tho...

Thank you for bringing this up

All those other missile launch failures I could understand, but what happened with that one that almost immediately after getting fired turn back around and hit the launch site!

@Schnittertm1

Жыл бұрын

It remembered that it left the stove on and wanted to go back to turn it off. You know, because of the fire hazard. It just somehow forgot that it was an already armed and fired missile.

@cheburekman696

Жыл бұрын

the targeting system was put upside down,im not kidding.

@chugachuga9242

Жыл бұрын

@@cheburekman696 if that’s true, it’s very funny

Shopping mall is also inaccurate. Adjacent to that mall is a repair plant and railroad loading area. Bulk of missiles hit the intended targets on the repair plant, the last missile hit the cargo on the railorad tracks. Because of the nature of said cargo (Ammunition), cook offs happened, which started a fire which took the mall. You could see news reports with hilarious things like glass bottles still standing perfectly on the shelves - something 1000kg RDX warhead of X-22 would never allowed.

@YoJenneh

Жыл бұрын

the maker of this video knows hes spewing Ukrainian propaganda to get views and $, sure what Russia is doing isnt good, but we will allow this Disinformation because we support Ukraine, People really likes to smoke that CNN pack even if they know its all mostly bs

@OskarasNauseda

Жыл бұрын

you know you are talking to bunch of war fanatics

@burningsinner1132

Жыл бұрын

@@OskarasNauseda It's worth breaking the spell though. When everyone stays silent, everyone feels compliant. When people disagree, those silently disagreeing feel less pressure. That's why fascist regimes try to force silence in the first place.

@Neokretai

Жыл бұрын

That is literally just the statement the Russian Defence Ministry put out. You can see pretty clearly from the released CTV recording that a missile hits the north side of the shopping mall. The second missile hit the probable intended target, which was a machinery repair plant further north.

Damn, i have so much of my childhood memories from that park in kyiv. This is very sad

*1.5 yrs Later and Russia Still Running Out Of Missiles & Ammo* 😭

Can we get a video of russian missle fails with the Benny Hill music playing?

@AngusAngus

Жыл бұрын

@@WontSeeReplies wake up to Russia invading whatever country they want to that year.

@agentgamingchannel.

Жыл бұрын

@@WontSeeReplies what is the msm

@michaeltheoret3842

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Hey, have commercial spoofs during this Video about "That little Blue Pill " and how it can help even the oldest tools " get it up".

@jamielonsdale3018

Жыл бұрын

Wow Don, you pissed off a couple of Putin fanboys. Kharkiv - there is no panic, only goodwill gesture. Kherson - there is no panic. only compassionate evacuations. Kyiv - there was no panic, only goodwill gesture. Byelhorivka - teaching slavic brothers how not to cross a river in a warzone - Ukraine was a good learner. Belgorod - fire? attack? comrade you are mistaken, we merely have big celebration of speshul military operation at Belgorod oil storage facility. is long-standing russki tradition you see. Meanwhile $/kg for Copium-155 is through the roof as Russian supplies run critically low. China refuses to share theirs as theyre stockpiling in preperation for Taiwan. Due to STUXNET, Iran has been unable to refine sufficient Copium-155 to produce any excuses.

@B.D.E.

Жыл бұрын

@@WontSeeReplies Cry harder PutinBot.

You nailed that "Zaporizhia" pronunciation, which, for some reason, I don't see often. Great job.

@The_ZeroLine

Жыл бұрын

It is easy to pronounce. I’m astounded by how many people are either too dumb to properly say it. It’s not even a tongue twister.

@cllncl

Жыл бұрын

@@The_ZeroLine Yeah, I think the only issue is that the 'correct' spelling looks too complicated (Zaporizhzhiya), as well as the effort to russify Ukraine, which leads to Zaporozhye being common too.