Royal Marine Reacts To Why the Chinese Stealth J-20 might be not what you think

Ойындар

Original Video (Why the Chinese Stealth J-20 might be not what you think)
• Why the Chinese Stealt...
DREADNOUGHT MEADERY!
KZread: / @dreadnoughtmeadery
Instagram: / dreadnoughtmeadery
BECOME A MEMBER
www.youtube.com/@OriginalHuma...
SOCIALS
►Instagram @OriginalHuman_
►Twitter: @OriginalHuman_
►Discord: / discord
►Facebook: / originalhuman.videos
►Business inquires: originalhumanbusiness@gmail.com
OTHER CHANNELS
►The Sword And Scabbard: / @theswordandscabbard7909
►OriginalAdventures: / channel
►OriginalHuman Geek: / @originalhumangeek MY EQUIPMENT:
Camera: amzn.to/3W9dL37
Lights: amzn.to/3JtLflf
Key Board: amzn.to/3JpPWwx
Headphones: amzn.to/3JrF15x
Mouse: amzn.to/49P81ij
Monitors: amzn.to/4aLd1FP
Mic: amzn.to/3U7XWXY
Audio mixer: amzn.to/4b2FJSr
StreamDeck: amzn.to/4b4lHH1
Favorite Books:
Norse Mythology: Neil Gaiman
amzn.to/4b24Ftc
The Way of Kings: Brandon Sanderson
amzn.to/3JyHIlu
Breath: James Nestor
amzn.to/3Jur9Y7
We Are Nature: Ray Mears
amzn.to/3JurhXB
The Last Kingdom: Bernard Cornwell
amzn.to/3w4JjN0

Пікірлер: 274

  • @HeheLife123
    @HeheLife1233 ай бұрын

    Those who question the capabilities of Chinese fighter jets should consider this: If the performance of the J-20 is not good, why does the military still need to purchase it on a large scale? The J20 has now entered mass production. The quantity has exceeded 300 pieces and is still in rapid production. 1. China has ranked first in the world in the field of supercomputers for many years and can perform large-scale calculations on J-20 design data. 2. China has the world's most advanced ultra-high-speed shock wave wind tunnel, code-named JF-22, which can test designed aircraft. 3. China leads the United States in the field of hypersonic weapons 4. China’s radar technology is also at the world’s advanced level and can verify the stealth performance of its country’s fighter jets. 5. China has made zero mistakes in its multiple lunar exploration missions and brought back lunar soil. The Chinese Mars rover has completed its landing on Mars. China's space station has been operating safely for several years. China's Beidou global navigation system is operating well. China's fourth-generation nuclear power plants are operating well. From these aspects, it can be verified from the side that there is no problem with the reliability of Chinese fighter jets.

  • @Ballacha

    @Ballacha

    Ай бұрын

    nice chinese military flag in the profile picture. 五毛拿好

  • @sans3go342

    @sans3go342

    24 күн бұрын

    found the ccp troll

  • @sahasrangshuchanda7214

    @sahasrangshuchanda7214

    22 күн бұрын

    But the troops of dragon recently got beaten up by Shepherds and chased by mountain tribes of Arunachal pradesh ..Ground reality😂😂😂

  • @HeheLife123

    @HeheLife123

    22 күн бұрын

    @@sahasrangshuchanda7214 First, China and India signed an agreement to ban the use of thermal weapons on the border. Secondly, I have all the relevant videos in 2020, including a large number of Indian soldiers surrendering to Chinese soldiers. If you want to see it, you can see it on the Internet. My channel has some footage of the Sino-Indian border conflict, welcome to watch

  • @xv6701

    @xv6701

    22 күн бұрын

    …and other lies the the Chinese tell themselves instead of crying themselves to sleep

  • @serpentblade8704
    @serpentblade87044 ай бұрын

    if a different country does something they would be skeptical, but when India brought out Tejas nobody cared cause it was a 4++ generation aircraft of INDIAN design over decades with American Engines, also AMCA program has been in works for a while and still not in prototype, i doubt others will think it's stolen or copied tech, even South korea's new stealth fighter is similar to f-22 raptor, so is japans mitsubhshi fighter jet. Also almost all aircraft have something made in other countries.

  • @roderickrobledo6373
    @roderickrobledo63734 ай бұрын

    F35 production began in 2021, development in 1995

  • @tgl6269
    @tgl62694 ай бұрын

    J20 is a modified version of J10. Double its engine and larger delta wing. J10 has DSI intake as well.

  • @marvinsiever6050

    @marvinsiever6050

    13 күн бұрын

    not at all, the J20 has a completlly different design philosophy

  • @ar1029
    @ar10293 ай бұрын

    China has already build more J20’s than America had F22’s in total that are combat capable.

  • @yaboigimli

    @yaboigimli

    2 ай бұрын

    and yet they still suck

  • @anm10wolvorinenotapanther32

    @anm10wolvorinenotapanther32

    2 ай бұрын

    So you just gonna ignore the +1000 F-35s in existence with even more still under production?

  • @johnlee1546

    @johnlee1546

    Ай бұрын

    @@yaboigimli have you tried it or what?

  • @raidenshougun9663

    @raidenshougun9663

    Ай бұрын

    @@yaboigimli You can always refund this aircraft, as long as you didn't use it for 2 hours, steam support is amazing!

  • @gld1010

    @gld1010

    13 күн бұрын

    @@anm10wolvorinenotapanther32 And the rest of the fighters.

  • @buddystewart2020
    @buddystewart20204 ай бұрын

    Don't worry about it, McDonnell Douglas has all those flying saucers we have yet to break out.

  • @MrYabber

    @MrYabber

    4 ай бұрын

    What about Northrop Grumman or Lockheed Martin?

  • @buddystewart2020

    @buddystewart2020

    4 ай бұрын

    @@MrYabber >>>I meant to type Lockheed Martin, but obviously, they used alien telepathy and made me type McDonnell Douglas instead.

  • @jonadabtheunsightly

    @jonadabtheunsightly

    4 ай бұрын

    Those are obsolete at this point. They're just not stealthy enough, for one thing, which is why people keep spotting them. The nanodrones are a much better option.

  • @buddystewart2020

    @buddystewart2020

    4 ай бұрын

    @@jonadabtheunsightly ... Military industrial complex, always fighting the last space war.

  • @Ballzdp2
    @Ballzdp24 ай бұрын

    Nothing compares to the f22 or f16 or f35 no Chinese fighter will ever compete with American fighters An USA is on gen 6 😂

  • @scottstewart5784
    @scottstewart57844 ай бұрын

    The US buys Rolls Royce engines - they allow them to compete and if they are better they win (oversimplified). The B52s are each getting 8 new RR power plants in competitive contract award. The US has Pratt and Whitney and GE in-country, among others.

  • @bigboi9877
    @bigboi98774 ай бұрын

    Thanks for another upload man!

  • @geektechpow4537
    @geektechpow45374 ай бұрын

    Nope this is all wrong. F22 and F35 have never been the base design of this J20. This is basically based on the Russian MIG 1.44. (which really look like it). The plane that seems to have been more copied is the J35. From what I can see, J20 seems to have adopted some element of the F35 (like the air intake) . But the overall shape and canard is basically coming from MIG 1.44. People only see that China copied US aircraft.. I mean just look at the KF51 and the KHANN.. they are very very look like F22 and F35. What is incredible from China that is more surprosing for me, it's not the capacity to copy, it's the capacity they had to leverage information they had and learn and now design their own aircraft. No everyone is capable of doing that in less than 10 years! Just look at how can alone, they could send a Space station, while we always struggle to send any module in international, while we are working with more than 13 different countries. Though I do agree with you. Not sure J20 is superior to F35, but Russian and Chinese are catching fast. Now problem is that F35 has always been considered as the best Aircraft (aside with F22) it has never really face any other aircraft in real combat and has a score of 0 kill. So Not sure who might win. I'm really thinking that China and Russia has other strategy to fight against F35. J20 and SU57 has been designed as well to make sure the pilot is able to control a various set of drone and they could be used to detect F35 way further than the J20 can do. Not sure. but Drone capabilities have been now demonstrated in Ukraine war that war is definitively entering in a new era of drone capabilities.

  • @andrewlim7751

    @andrewlim7751

    3 ай бұрын

    The Americans as usual mock at every other jet, until they got hit by one.

  • @anm10wolvorinenotapanther32

    @anm10wolvorinenotapanther32

    2 ай бұрын

    @@andrewlim7751 Well, when everyone runs away the moment they learn F-22s and F-35s are in play what else do you expect?

  • @andrewlim7751

    @andrewlim7751

    2 ай бұрын

    @@anm10wolvorinenotapanther32 That's why they bully third world.

  • @nickexline3882
    @nickexline38824 ай бұрын

    I live here in Indianapolis, Indiana and we have a huge Rolls Royce that employs about 4k people. I’ve read that more products are produced here than anywhere else in the world.

  • @dougfurr5217
    @dougfurr52174 ай бұрын

    China is still unable to build home grown Jet engines powerful enough to compete with NATO tech. Their newest jets on their newest carrier have to be light weight, carry much less fuel and weapons than US and NATO counter parts. They have 1 deployed "test" carriers, and 2 new home built ones in trials, but are still unable to get their catapults working. Yes, they WILL eventually work those issues out in time. BUT what will take MUCH longer is all that America and Europe has learned USING these machines. It takes generations to master it all, then enact systems to pass that knowledge down to the next generation. China is still decades away from threatening the US. Not to mention, just because China has "more ships" does not mean sh1t. US alone has HALF the world navies tonnage. If u add up EVERY naval ship, HALF that weight is American. Then you must think about her allies added to that.

  • @Papi1960R
    @Papi1960R3 ай бұрын

    PS remember that in every contest where the F-35 had to actually be flown by non-US pilots and graded against competitors in strike and air defense tasks: Finland, Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, S Korea, Japan, the UAE and Singapore: it lost to the Rafale. Only Switzerland and a the UAE published their results, and it wasn't even close. Only threats of economic coercion and outright sanctions have enabled the F-35 program to continue. The RAF hates theirs.

  • @SHINR__
    @SHINR__4 ай бұрын

    " The J-20 is not to be ridiculed - Intergrated opticak targeting systems are present " They cannot look directly head on, and it's not 360°, its 200°. I have no idea why he's saying not to ridicule the jet thats illogical. " China is more than capable of manufacturing their own electronics- " They cannot even get western equivalent chips for something as basic as cellphones. That video has much bias it's worth completely disregarding.

  • @jonathantoymaker
    @jonathantoymaker3 ай бұрын

    WS-19 engine is what they use....more powerful than the F-22

  • @michaelzastrow9082

    @michaelzastrow9082

    2 ай бұрын

    Wrong. They use WS-10 which is the same engine as the J-11 and J-10

  • @jonathantoymaker

    @jonathantoymaker

    2 ай бұрын

    @@michaelzastrow9082 No your actually wrong... like I said J-20 does use WS-19 engine although older models may not yet...

  • @michaelzastrow9082

    @michaelzastrow9082

    2 ай бұрын

    From my most recent info, which could be out of date, the ws-19 was still in development and slated for the j-35

  • @jonathantoymaker

    @jonathantoymaker

    2 ай бұрын

    @@michaelzastrow9082 China is always ahead of what the West believes about them...

  • @seraphx26

    @seraphx26

    15 күн бұрын

    @@michaelzastrow9082 The WS-15 engine is the newest engine that at least some J-20's are now using and it is slightly more powerful than the F-22 engine but not as durable long term according to the Chinese sources available.

  • @sahasrangshuchanda7214
    @sahasrangshuchanda721422 күн бұрын

    Recently pla troops were beaten up by local Shepherds trained by Indian army near arunachal pradesh...And their horrific crying faces in transport aircraft when deployed at high altitude..These altitudes are cake walk of Indian high altitude forces ..It went viral also ..They are ordered while Indian troops requests and volenteers to face challenges ..Indian army has lots of real combat experiences than china ..already Indian ocean is under control of Indian navy in choke points of China's global trade ...China knows this very well ...In snowy harsh mountains its the experience and determination that matters more than technology

  • @user-me4tj9re7m
    @user-me4tj9re7m2 ай бұрын

    An interesting fact. The us air force is anxious to upgrade the f22 in 2024. Smart people know why.😂

  • @user-kq5ke5yb6k
    @user-kq5ke5yb6k4 ай бұрын

    The size is compensating for something....

  • @tobyli52

    @tobyli52

    3 ай бұрын

    More fuel, longer range

  • @h365h
    @h365h10 күн бұрын

    Interesting people can just say which plane is better from some pictures

  • @JK-wx3il
    @JK-wx3il2 ай бұрын

    I'm impressed it doesn't run on diesel fuel.

  • @tobyli52
    @tobyli523 ай бұрын

    I like all the keyboard warriors laughing at J20 and China here. You all know jack shit

  • @koiyujo1543

    @koiyujo1543

    3 ай бұрын

    exactly the Chinese looks like it can't do anything but it can. Heres the thing china showed and shocked the world last year with it's 7nm chip wafers so clearly they can inovate and they copied technology mainly to catch up but dude it should be obvious capitalist countries have also copied technology like china has so don't be spelling that bs hypocrisy saying china is copying tech YEA NO S*** stup'id capitalism countries do that too! as a gen z socialist American that couldn't be more obvious! Socialism can have innovation just like capitalism I mean dude where would we be without the worlds first satellite sputnik

  • @koiyujo1543

    @koiyujo1543

    3 ай бұрын

    Chinese looks like it can't do anything but it can. Heres the thing china showed and shocked the world last year with it's 7nm chip wafers so clearly they can inovate and they copied technology mainly to catch up but dude it should be obvious capitalist countries have also copied technology like china has so don't be spelling that bs hyp'ocrisy saying china is copying tech YEA NO S*** stu'p'id capitalism countries do that too! as a gen z socialist American that couldn't be more obvious! Socialism can have innovation just like capitalism I mean dude where would we be without the worlds first satellite sputnik just because china is behind doesn't mean they are actually catching up

  • @yaboigimli

    @yaboigimli

    2 ай бұрын

    Oh ok commie chyna cant build a simple bridge correctly but you trust their jet lol

  • @boberKurwa23

    @boberKurwa23

    9 күн бұрын

    true, but the people praising the J20 know just as little, we will have to see. All we know for a fact is that China had some of the worst 4th gen fighter on the planet, we'll see if they were able to turn it around with the 5th gen

  • @jorgecgonzalez9976
    @jorgecgonzalez99763 ай бұрын

    You can maybe, maybe maybe appreciate their ability to "STEAL". F-35 can handle this jet no problem especially with the current updates and future Radar and Engine updates. By the way F-35 will not get adaptive engines right now, the current engines will get a engine core update to increase thrust by "I think 10% and Range by 5% but most important lower heat in engine and increase electrical output. Please do a video on the Abrams tank replacement the Abrams X so you can see how the F-35 tech is filtering into tanks as well.

  • @zayhansdah
    @zayhansdah4 ай бұрын

    ah the cheeky peek

  • @samblue9798
    @samblue97983 ай бұрын

    @6:45 What do you mean they are copying “us”? You are not an American and the F-22 is an American fighter.

  • @totallynottoaster1114

    @totallynottoaster1114

    2 ай бұрын

    He has American citizenship.

  • @quinmordboyd7986
    @quinmordboyd79863 ай бұрын

    rolls royce engines are produced in minnesota and michigan

  • @RogueBeatsARG
    @RogueBeatsARG2 ай бұрын

    IDK about "scrap all they could about others countries tech" Japan scapt a Porsche 959 and made the Nissan GT-R

  • @-Luna-tic.exe-
    @-Luna-tic.exe-4 ай бұрын

    The f35 was designed in the 80s and 90s and first flight in 2006. F22was designed also in 86 First flight in 97. To give you an idea of how advanced us aircraft design is, the sr71, the fastest plane in history to this day was designed in the late 50s. The u2 was a stopgap because the us could not produce the titanium the sr71 required, and it entered service in early 60s after buying the titanium required from russia under shell companies, lol In the us, most of the "UFO" sightings are often just experimental aircraft being test flown.

  • @Bobcat173rd

    @Bobcat173rd

    4 ай бұрын

    There’s a reason there’s so many UFO sightings in the states and not really anywhere else. Skunkworks goofing around in the sky.

  • @michaelingram9583
    @michaelingram95834 ай бұрын

    From an American thank you bro I totally agree they need to come up with their own designs!! It gets really annoying but all they got were blue print info nothing in the technology department that's all kept locked away in a dark program but love the shows we have very similar taste and thoughts lol 😂

  • @andrewlim7751

    @andrewlim7751

    3 ай бұрын

    J20 resemble what plane actually? 😁😁

  • @jetli740

    @jetli740

    3 ай бұрын

    aerodynamic dont care about your feeling. turkey, korea japan 5th gen all look the same why? like boat hull all look the same there is a reason. may people like you to think china need to make a square box jet fighter to be original.

  • @DroneStrike1776
    @DroneStrike17764 ай бұрын

    F-22 is powered by a Pratt and Whitney F119, based about 2 hours from where I live in Southern New England. It's made only for the F-22 and prototype variants. It's designed to be stealthy from the beginning, unlike the J-20.

  • @Out-Of-Service
    @Out-Of-Service4 ай бұрын

    Probably the biggest advantage the US has is that it's pilots constantly train. It's been said that Chinese pilots don't get much actual flight time. It's cheaper to put them in simulators. Fuel and maintenance are expensive for these jets, hence the giant US military budget.

  • @alexisrivera200xable
    @alexisrivera200xable4 ай бұрын

    It is exactly what I think. The embodiment of "Copy my homework but make it a little different so they don't notice". The problem is that once you copy something else like the F35, you are playing catch-up with the people who invented the thing, did the research and UNDERSTAND the mechanics of the aircraft. As an imitator you will invariably miss the finer details and end up with an inferior copy of the original.

  • @MrYabber

    @MrYabber

    4 ай бұрын

    Beautifully said.

  • @walteredinger652

    @walteredinger652

    4 ай бұрын

    At the same time they aren't putting the time and capital investment into the R and D

  • @geektechpow4537

    @geektechpow4537

    4 ай бұрын

    What are you talking about. The industrial world is always working the same way. French invented the TGV (high speed train) do you think other have not copied some part to amek it then better? It's the principle of always take what the best have done. How do you think US have become so good in rocket science, if it was not to copy and acquire german engineer that work on german rocket. I've been working in industry since very long time to understand that when someone lead the market, the other don't sapend R&D on this part, but use the money to improve this design. It's never a catch up but rather a tech competition that who is going to get the best tech. Right now Chinese dominate EV tech..they have surpass Tesla. but TEsla try to keep innovate. but believe me, other countries will copy. Same for Rusian Drone, the Lancet drone that has been so deadly, will be copied in near future.

  • @alexisrivera200xable

    @alexisrivera200xable

    4 ай бұрын

    @@geektechpow4537 I"m specifically talking about building military tech based on stolen documents gathered by spies. This isn't about iterations on publicly available technologies and improvements like it happens in regular industry as you point out. It is not like licensing stuff where you can get access to direct support or more detailed schematics so you can make improvements. When stolen military secrets are used to make copies, you don't have any of the expertise or the access to all the information and R&D data required to make it, you instead make the stuff in secret and become severely limited in order to keep the secrecy, ending up with a lesser version of the tech. Can they build upon that and do R&D themselves to then make a superior version? Yes but not really, at that point they are bound to start running into the same issues the original researchers dealt with so it is more like them making the OG research in reverse, it's not less expensive and its basically just as time consuming in terms of strategic value.

  • @geektechpow4537

    @geektechpow4537

    4 ай бұрын

    @@alexisrivera200xable I understand your point of view. But I think you underestimate how most of copies that you can found on any industry including military are actually designed from spy. US has been spying all around the world and get all various tech from Russia, Germany or China (they have to understand how competitor tech work to ensure that their can't be counter. I know it sound rare, but it's a spy game between super power and always has been. I'm not saying all of them, for example, i've been working on some drone and security was the least priority of the customer and I'm not talking about security on the unmanned vehicle but security at the development level. anyone could access any files. But I'm not saying that you are wrong. you are still right. for some people, even reverse engineering, or copying will give them hard time to figure out why they did this or that. Believe me, US is buying any weapon from Russia or China just to make sure they can reverse engineer and see what are the weak point or not. Reverse engineer by the correct team can actually give you very lot of information about the coating, the structure of the vehicle.

  • @omg2569
    @omg25692 ай бұрын

    Er can u check on the J20 engjne and compare with F35? Just look at railway speed.. China has built around 26,000 miles (42,000 kilometers) of dedicated high-speed railways since 2008 and plans to top 43,000 miles (70,000 kilometers) by 2035. Meanwhile, the United States has just 375 route-miles of track cleared for operation at more than 100 mph

  • @xv6701

    @xv6701

    22 күн бұрын

    The Chinese economy isn’t strong enough for individuals to own automobiles en masse. PLA is all tofu dreg

  • @factyz1373
    @factyz137324 күн бұрын

    Chinese j20 might be not their own design but look out for j 35 or fc 31 which is a homegrown deaign and very stealthy also. And for the engines they are replacing the ws 10 and al31f with ws15 engines most recently, man they are very capable. j35 also have homegrown engines. They are certainly challenging US And don't forget they have now 250-300 j20s which is scary💀

  • @xv6701

    @xv6701

    22 күн бұрын

    How much did you get paid to say this?

  • @factyz1373

    @factyz1373

    22 күн бұрын

    @@xv6701 bro what the hell are you talking about? I am worried about it and if you think that i get paid then keep thinking cuz I can't stop it by the way i am an Indian so what the hell i will get about spreading their agenda. Reality is reality if you want to live in your imaginary world 🌎 then keep live in it. Then only you can satisfy yourself for the time being.

  • @iamaloafofbread8926
    @iamaloafofbread89264 ай бұрын

    7:44 If you are an American citizen, duo citizen or not, you're still considered an American. Just ask anyone in the U.S. There is an American in everyone.

  • @pugsbella
    @pugsbella4 ай бұрын

    The j20 looks like a flying house on radar according to western pilots

  • @steeljawX

    @steeljawX

    4 ай бұрын

    So if China and the US do start a bit of a conflict, all radar's gonna say is that there are super sonic houses and bumblebees screaming over the Pacific....Absolutely nothing unnatural about that. It's their natural migratory pattern after all.

  • @jonadabtheunsightly
    @jonadabtheunsightly4 ай бұрын

    No, the J-20 is not as good as the F-22. The biggest blocker is the jet engines. There are other issues but this is the most serious one. The PLA can't buy German or American jet engines (because for some reason not everyone trusts them -- weird, right?). Cutting-edge jet engine technology is very specialized, particularly in terms of the materials science involved. Certain parts of the engine (for example, the turbine blades) are very specialized in terms of precisely how they are constructed, in order to achieve a very tricky balance between high durability, high heat resistance, fine detail, and light weight. Like battleship armor in the first half of the twentieth century, the facilities that make these parts are extremely specialized and quite difficult to reproduce at another site even if you know everything about how they work, and on top of that there are closely guarded secrets involved. In practice, this means the J-20 has about half the operational range it could theoretically have with better engines (which is probably why it's been seen flying with extra fuel tanks on wing pylons, a significant compromise considering its impact on stealth), and there are also limitations on acceleration and maneuverability. This is not necessarily an insurmountable problem, and I would imagine they are actively working on it. But it is not an *easy* problem to solve either, and it is not a foregone conclusion that they will necessarily be able to solve it quickly.

  • @user-xj9jj2tn5q

    @user-xj9jj2tn5q

    3 ай бұрын

    Disappointment, they have solved it, if you don't know what WS-15 is,please google it

  • @user-xj9jj2tn5q

    @user-xj9jj2tn5q

    3 ай бұрын

    From your remarks, I can be 100% sure that you know nothing about China’s aero-engine research from 2010 to the present, as well as breakthroughs in materials science and manufacturing technology, and the education of relevant talents. Just like I say now that China is on par with the United States in the military electronics industry, and is even slightly ahead of the United States in various radar technologies, you may not believe it at all. Your understanding of China's industrial capabilities is still in 2005.lol

  • @string_fellow_hawk
    @string_fellow_hawk4 ай бұрын

    Great idea for video , all gens separate. ❤

  • @user-bx4xf4ti3g
    @user-bx4xf4ti3g3 ай бұрын

    世界上的任何最先进的战机,这里是指全部,在J-20+PL-15面前都是靶机。

  • @xv6701

    @xv6701

    22 күн бұрын

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh you’re serious. Let me be polite: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • @HeheLife123
    @HeheLife1233 ай бұрын

    The bad news for the Western world is: the latest mass-produced J20 uses China’s own engine WS15. Recently, my country's large transport aircraft have also been replaced with domestically produced high bypass ratio engines WS-20

  • @Psalmster023
    @Psalmster0233 ай бұрын

    As a Teacher I can tell you those that copy have very little understanding of what they turn in.

  • @MistikCo

    @MistikCo

    3 ай бұрын

    Except in this case, they can resubmit the copied assignment over and over again, each time more refined and having more understanding.

  • @artao5
    @artao54 ай бұрын

    Regarding "copying" other countries. I'm not saying they haven't learned things from other countries' aircraft, it's also true that when confronted with certain engineering problems, there's only so many solutions and different engineers and scientists tend toward them without influence from others.

  • @m2hmghb

    @m2hmghb

    4 ай бұрын

    There's a difference between getting to the same point on your own and using another person's homework to get to the same point. chicoms love to compromise us defense companies.

  • @AlexHunter2525

    @AlexHunter2525

    4 ай бұрын

    Yeah but it's been proven they've stolen plans and blueprints from American aircraft that they folded into their tech. Which is partially why their radar crossection is a square meter. They didn't do the work to truly develop their own tech, just copied partial plans and made it work as best they could. And failed for the most part.

  • @Ranger-Cealers
    @Ranger-Cealers4 ай бұрын

    In regards to jet technology the USA is possibly 10 to 15 years ahead of its competitors, yes the J20 is made with alot of data from the F35 but when you seriously look at them side by side the f35 is smaller faster more maneuverable and with data-link it connects to nearly everything NATO has in the air and on the ground, and on top of that they are prototyping full sized jet drones that can accompany both the 35 and 22 with alot more missiles and different types of missles. And also china's doctrine with jets hasn't been tested in true combat, NATO uses what's called Camaos which uses all types of aircraft needed for a mission, this is standard for NATO and the US can also make its own Camaos which would render the J20 incapable of attack or defense based of the Camaos made for the mission

  • @daviano_R.T.
    @daviano_R.T.4 ай бұрын

    It is Chinese engine but the problem is they are still trying to eliminate the heat trail because unlike F22, the J20 is really underperforming to what they want to, so i guess for another decade you will not see the J20 as problem, specially if you have F35 even F16 still able to pick up a fight with the J20 in my opinion After edit: Also it is still technically a 5th gen aircraft that practically almost have the same stealth technology with the F35, unlike Russian T50, the J20 is actually a 5th gen aircraft and will be a big problem, F35 and newer version of F-16 can keep up on it but both F-35 and F-16 still need to work together because F-16, F-15, F-18 in my opinion cannot detect J20 on itself if they are no F-35 acting as an eyes for them. It is really interesting in my opinion and yes it is worrying for me as Indonesian

  • @xv6701

    @xv6701

    22 күн бұрын

    Source: I made it the fuck up

  • @redneckturtle771
    @redneckturtle7713 ай бұрын

    Thinking that that flying 18 wheeler is stealthy is hilarious

  • @FP194
    @FP1944 ай бұрын

    The United States is already on Gen 6

  • @user-xj9jj2tn5q

    @user-xj9jj2tn5q

    3 ай бұрын

    China is preparing Gen6 too, No one is willing fall behind

  • @user-ec8gg4pr3b
    @user-ec8gg4pr3bАй бұрын

    no worry, J20 is uptraded J6, no threat at all.

  • @Indyofthedead
    @Indyofthedead4 ай бұрын

    In my opinion, I don't think the J 20 is going to be the kind of fighter aircraft that many people consider a "fighter". I doubt this thing will see much dogfighting since you don't need to in an era with long-range, independent-radar guided missiles. I especially don't think it's going to be performing deep-air-space-infiltration missions. Instead, I think this is going to be the fighter equivalent of a sniper and used defensively. Part of my reasoning has to do with a lower radar cross section compared to the F-22 and F-35. Now, inb4 we don't know any of that, it's classified. The plane is massive compared to the prior two which means more stuff for radars to detect, no matter how well the angles reflect. But again, if you're sniping, that doesn't matter as much. Consider what was said about the E3, it wasn't that it couldn't detect the J 20, but that it couldn't detect it IN TIME. Who cares if you see the enemy if they've already sent three missiles your way? Thus is likely the same reasoning that the F-35 isn't as good of a dog fighter as the F-22, because the plan isn't for it to get that close to an enemy aircraft to begin with. This thing, therefore, will likely be used to actively go after 4th gen aircraft in any conflict, while using guerilla tactics on 5th gen aircraft. I believe this to be thr case since China isn't dumb and they realize that when you lift design secrets, the designer knows what you've stolen and, therefore, what your copy-paste design is capable of. I believe the J 20 was just a learning experience, or practice run, at building a 5th gen aircraft. Then, like their Navy, they will use this learning experience to create their own from the ground up, which wouldn't surprise me if it's already in development.

  • @Petedsquid
    @Petedsquid4 ай бұрын

    You should react to Not What You Think. They also cover military stuff.

  • @jetli740
    @jetli7403 ай бұрын

    Stealth -is russian who came up with the mathematical which all 5gen fighter shape base on, all have same angle so those who claim US invented stealth really need to go back to school

  • @glumour3081
    @glumour30814 ай бұрын

    😂😂😂 Chinese people say your bullets are only for home decoration until now without gunpowder.... Is that also stealing ? copy ?

  • @Rudraiya
    @Rudraiya4 ай бұрын

    If xerox machine would be a country that will be china lol

  • @TheRagratus
    @TheRagratus4 ай бұрын

    @3:23 That ship IS falling apart, and has cranes and shit falling into it lol. That is the Adm Kuznetsov, sitting in repair since 2016.

  • @NickJaime

    @NickJaime

    4 ай бұрын

    That was the sister ship in Ukraine and was in the middle of construction.

  • @andrewlim7751

    @andrewlim7751

    3 ай бұрын

    As usual, they're supposed to mock at other creations, please don't spoil the show. 😁😁

  • @Nyarb
    @Nyarb4 ай бұрын

    Canards are used on many Europe or Asian fighters like most russian (Su-30…) or the deltawingplanes of europe (JAS 39 Gripen…) they are used to make the aircraft maneuverable by completely rotating (like the J-20s does).

  • @nissan300ztt
    @nissan300ztt4 ай бұрын

    P51 Mustang had Rolls Royce Merlin Engines, and what a beautiful sounding engine it is.

  • @saplingthrasher23

    @saplingthrasher23

    4 ай бұрын

    The American built Mustang never had a RR Merlin. The P-51 originally had an Allison V-1710. The model built for Britain was modified by British to hold the RR Merlin engine which had better performance. This led to the definitive design of the P-51D; which had a Packard V-1670-7 Merlin. Which is a license built version of the Merlin 66 built in America by Packard Motorcar Company.

  • @nissan300ztt

    @nissan300ztt

    4 ай бұрын

    @@saplingthrasher23 P51D which was made in the US had the Merlin. There is a man who owns one about 15 miles from me.

  • @saplingthrasher23

    @saplingthrasher23

    4 ай бұрын

    @@nissan300zttBut is it Rolls Royce Merlin 66? Or is it the Packard built Merlin that was licensed for use by Rolls Royce that I clearly state is in the P-51D? Edit; If it is a RR Merlin; it was built for Britian by the USA and modified by British for the Rolls Royce Merlin 66. This is what led to the P-51D with its "American made Merlin". That's the point I'm trying to make above.

  • @nissan300ztt

    @nissan300ztt

    4 ай бұрын

    @@saplingthrasher23 I will have to ask him. Were going to his airfield for a rocket day in a few weeks.

  • @saplingthrasher23

    @saplingthrasher23

    4 ай бұрын

    @@nissan300ztt It's no big deal. Technically their both Merlins. It's just that Rolls-Royce allowed Packard to use its design for efficiency in production since they(R-R) couldn't meet demand for the engines unlike the United States.

  • @chrisstrand500
    @chrisstrand5004 ай бұрын

    Doesn’t have a good RCS. Missile fodder.

  • @what6382
    @what63824 ай бұрын

    I think you might be thinking of the Rolls Royce upgrade engines for the B52. These engines are made by Rolls Roys in Louisiana, USA. Additionally, Google shows this: “Rolls-Royce Holdings plc is a British multinational aerospace and defence company incorporated in February 2011. The company owns Rolls-Royce, a business established in 1904 which today designs, manufactures and distributes power systems for aviation and other industries.” The Pratt & Whitney F135 engine is considered the most advanced fighter jet engine in the world, and apparently, no other military jet engine comes close to it. Pratt & Whitney is in the process of an upgrade for this engine. It seems like no group of hackers from any country have been able, so far, to get their hands on any of the blueprints for this engine.

  • @tonyharmon8512
    @tonyharmon85124 ай бұрын

    The Chinese engines have several problems that relate to their inability to replicate the metallurgy of American or European industries yet. The service life of their engines has been on the order of 1/5 the life of our engines which means they must build a much larger inventory and they have a significantly higher down time due to constant engine swaps. This means a substantial loss of the sortie rate based on any given number of aircraft compared to ours. It also means they have a significantly higher rate of crashes due to engine failure in flight. As pointed out the engines are unable to develop enough power to supercruise and that also gets reflected in their responsiveness. Rather than all aspect stealthiness they are most stealthy from the front and less so to the sides and rear. If going up against a networked enemy who can locate them easily from the sides or rear and put that info into the combat net then they will experience significant attrition in a fight. Is it a significant improvement Yes. Is it equal to our aircraft No. This also does not take into account the newest aircraft designs in current testing and likely to enter service in the late '20's to early '30's. We have a whole new world of missiles in the production pipeline with both hypersonic missiles of advanced design and concurrently hypersonic fighters as well. We might look as if we are behind and occasionally our enemies do surprise us but within the next ten or so years the US is going to field a series of new weapons of war that ought to shock much of the world.

  • @alvinquan8848
    @alvinquan88482 ай бұрын

    I’m glad someone like this guy knows nothing about new military tech in China. That would be great for the future competition among China to any other countries. This guy even compared j20 to f35(didn’t do any research huh). That’s sad u still compare j20 to ur old crap(both f22 and f35), don’t even say there’s a new version of double seat j20, which pilots in back seat can command drones.

  • @steeljawX
    @steeljawX4 ай бұрын

    So my thing about Chinese copying so many things is that they boast a population of over 1 billion people and the most innovative they can get is, "Let's send bodies to other places to take their ideas and then we'll use their ideas to make our own stuff." I mean, there's just no pride in there at all and very low self respect when they try to back it up telling the world not to call them copycats. If they were so great an innovation, they'd find the stealth breakthrough just as the USA did with a third of their populace.

  • @user-ej5wz5tr6h
    @user-ej5wz5tr6h3 ай бұрын

    That's a very amateurish channel. It feels like a painter reviewing an industrial product, using all these non-professional terms like "looks like" and "should be." Military aircraft are incredibly complex engineering feats. It's not just about appearances or imitation; it involves rigorous wind tunnel testing. By the way, the world's most advanced and largest wind tunnel is in China.

  • @user-ej5wz5tr6h

    @user-ej5wz5tr6h

    3 ай бұрын

    And,You can investigate how many senior engineers China produces each year. The technological advancements in the United States are contributed to by Chinese individuals in the country, comprising nearly a quarter.

  • @user-ej5wz5tr6h

    @user-ej5wz5tr6h

    3 ай бұрын

    IQ Ranking 2024 1, Japan 2, Taiwan (China) 3, Singapore (74% Chinese) 4, Hong Kong (China) 5, China 6, South Korea

  • @michaeld.uchiha9084
    @michaeld.uchiha90844 ай бұрын

    Well of course Stealth fighter would all look kinda the same. Because only some designs can be stealth capable.

  • @adamrou12345
    @adamrou123454 ай бұрын

    A Rolls Royce jet engine will almost certainly be made in the US probably in Indianapolis. Some components might be made in Canada. The big 4 GE, Pratt Whitney, CFM and Rolls Royce which represent more than 90% market share of both civil and military applications build their engines almost exclusively in the US. Many of the components in Russian jet engines are also made in the US Yakovlev is still reliant on many critical components fron Honeywell, components which they are able to purchase and import via various European rat holes thanks to sanctions which is kind of ironic that the Russians are jumping through so many hoops to get US parts considering they are so proud of their "domestic" industry. Aerospace is one of the few manufacturing games the US is still thoroughly dominant in.

  • @user-ug4yr8er9g
    @user-ug4yr8er9gАй бұрын

    J20🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪

  • @bluflaam777
    @bluflaam7774 ай бұрын

    RR engines are made in Finland now

  • @AlexHunter2525
    @AlexHunter25254 ай бұрын

    One of the biggest reasons the US is so advanced is a combination of a more meritocratic society early on, a major focus on private sector and the insane wealth developed by all the above and our insane natural advantages and resources.

  • @Skelath
    @Skelath4 ай бұрын

    At the moment China leads in nuclear power, and they started up the world's first 4th generation reactor last year with nuclear power plants currently in mass production. China is the 2nd wealthiest country the world and it seems they're finally spending it.

  • @mybru1

    @mybru1

    4 ай бұрын

    Missile tech as well.

  • @dicer666
    @dicer6664 ай бұрын

    hina? What or who is China...call them as what they are...Xerox.

  • @bornagain2641
    @bornagain26414 ай бұрын

    stealing and cheating never win

  • @strikergaming0001
    @strikergaming00014 ай бұрын

    A good video that breaks down the fighter generations is the evolution of fighter jets by armour cast, it is a bit on the longer side but i'd say its worth the watch.

  • @user-kq5ke5yb6k
    @user-kq5ke5yb6k4 ай бұрын

    I wouldn't want a Chinese engine on a jet, a ship....

  • @SbrGrendel65
    @SbrGrendel654 ай бұрын

    P51 Mustangs from WWII had a different engine then they put the Rolls Royce Merlin engine. But Packard made it work n America for the P51.

  • @MarkMiller304
    @MarkMiller3044 ай бұрын

    Always copying, why make a car with 4 wheels, go make a 5 wheel car!

  • @robertcampomizzi7988
    @robertcampomizzi79884 ай бұрын

    7:34 That's how the Romans got their navy from the Carthaginians. That's the way of things since boards with spikes in them.

  • @victorgurule3711
    @victorgurule37114 ай бұрын

    Also…training is a huge part.

  • @Exile-exe
    @Exile-exe4 ай бұрын

    The reason it’s so long is because it needs bigger engines to make the speed, but they are highly prone to breaking down, do not have the same longevity as ours and their fuel efficiency is substantially lower. China is NOT a HitTech Nation. They like to appear as one. But you should be aware that before 2017, they were unable to machine the roller ball for a ball point pen. Yes that’s right, before 2017, China was incapable of fully manufacturing their own ball point pens. They had to outsource them. China is a paper tiger. But they’re ambitious and ruthless in those ambitions.

  • @Bobcat173rd
    @Bobcat173rd4 ай бұрын

    I heard it’s based on a Russian design that’s based on what the Russians thought was stealth based on the F-117. Long story short; when you get your F-22 off wish.

  • @VPRZR0
    @VPRZR04 ай бұрын

    Its difficult to say how good a piece of hardware is based purely on a spec sheet. A lotta people seemed pessimistic regarding the challenger 1. Desert storm proved it was effective in its role. I feel the J-20 would need to demonstrate its capabilities in actual combat before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn.

  • @53kenner

    @53kenner

    4 ай бұрын

    The news media also constantly told us that the M1 Abrams couldn't survive in the desert environment of Iraq. Our technology is continually ridiculed and our adversaries are always a generation ahead -- until they go up against each other.

  • @nightraver56
    @nightraver564 ай бұрын

    Canards are good for low speed maneuverability, but they are known to be a non-stealth feature. Of course the Chinese canards could have a good load of bullshit that makes theirs stealthy

  • @george217
    @george2174 ай бұрын

    "You stole everything that YOU know, but you didn't steal everything that I know..." Uncle Sam

  • @RVize
    @RVize4 ай бұрын

    I spot these once a day js not saying what i do just know its like that scene from austin powers when they look at the radar and they say "it looks like a big fat" JOHNSON! "YES SIR?"

  • @chrismason6857
    @chrismason68574 ай бұрын

    The easiest simple way to eplain the aircraft design is that they are almost deliberately deigned to be unstable at low speed and tight manoeuvres to allow them to outturn their opponent. It’s the super high tech aeronautical computers that stop the aircraft from simply falling out of the sky, by making thousands of tiny corrections to control surfaces (flaps etc) automatically. That is where the Chinese can’t compete with America. They are years away from it.

  • @bryanohlsson4689
    @bryanohlsson46894 ай бұрын

    While the rest of the world is playing catchup to the US with their 5th gens. The US already has the 6th gen about ready to roll. The Chinese are good at making copies of other countries items.

  • @ojpete
    @ojpete4 ай бұрын

    China and Russia don't have 5th Gen planes, due to the lack of stealth. While their planes might be stealthy to Chinese and Russian radars, America and NATO allies have better radar systems and can see those jests. That said, they are low visibility jets, and very good jets to boot. The F-35 should win the battle with a J-20 as long as it detects the J-20 far enough away to take a kill shot and gets to scootin' before it has a chance to retaliate. On the other hand, if the J-20 gets eyes on the F-35, it's likely the F-35 pilot is going to have a very bad day, it's not an air superiority fighter. Another issue with Chinese engines is that they don't last as long as US and European engines. From what I've read, the Chinese engines last any where from one quarter to one tenth as long before needing to be replaced. Not just serviced, but wholly replaced. That seems like a disaster waiting to happen for a nation hoping to build up a large and robust air force.

  • @jacquelinejohnson9447
    @jacquelinejohnson94474 ай бұрын

    There is a major problem with corruption and quality control in Chinese and Russian militaries. This results in many equipment failures and/or underpar performance in an overwhelming majority of their military equipment. MHO.

  • @michelians1148
    @michelians11484 ай бұрын

    No gun 😬

  • @daltonmckee4788
    @daltonmckee47884 ай бұрын

    F35 would drop a J20 before the J20 knew the F35 was there. Stealth is one thing but US targeting systems are on another level

  • @dennisyarbrough7284
    @dennisyarbrough72844 ай бұрын

    The f-22 can fly at supersonic speed without afterburners

  • @ExUSSailor
    @ExUSSailor4 ай бұрын

    In 2013, the PLA tried using J-20s to infiltrate Indian airspace. The Indian Air Force Rafales, and, Su-30MKIs were able to detect it at extreme ranges. The Indian pilots, flying export model aircraft, would have been able to score BVR kills against China's "5th Gen" fighter.

  • @Iamthelolrus

    @Iamthelolrus

    4 ай бұрын

    Fun fact, china only had 2 prototype j20s in 2013.

  • @72tadrian65

    @72tadrian65

    4 ай бұрын

    Seems like they’ve had a lot of time to maybe improve their designs up to this day. I would still treat this tech with the upmost respect and caution. Jus sayen

  • @1075dvc

    @1075dvc

    4 ай бұрын

    Bro stop lying, in 2013 China only had 2 operational j-20 prototypes.

  • @nickb2049

    @nickb2049

    4 ай бұрын

    whats with Indian nationalists lying so much lately?

  • @whiteshark450

    @whiteshark450

    4 ай бұрын

    Blatant lie lol.

  • @beesnestna9544
    @beesnestna95444 ай бұрын

    The F-35 development started in the mid 1990s and the JXX program wasn't initially a development of "stealth technology". It was simply for an advanced (home built) fighter that eventually evolved into "stealth". Back in 1999 a U.S. F-117 stealth "night fighter" was shot down over Kosovo (a whole other story) and there was no doubt (by US officials) that the stealth technology would be sold to the highest bidders. Jump forward to 2007 and Chinese hackers infiltrated the computers at Lockheed-Martin where they stole plans for the U.S. F-35 stealth fighter. That being said, there was already an encounter between the F-35 and a Chinese J-20 over the South China Sea. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown and Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach, (head of Pacific Air Forces) both said (after the encounter) that "the J-20 was nothing to lose sleep over."😄That's why the Chinese "stealth" fighters look so much like American design, because basically, they are. China can't obtain this kind of tech without stealing it from others. It's the Chinese way.😉

  • @aaronyork3995
    @aaronyork39954 ай бұрын

    I’m no expert but by expert accounts it’s a flying brick not a true 5 gen

  • @jetli740

    @jetli740

    3 ай бұрын

    google and compare this brick fly faster than f22 and f35

  • @oneeyewillie8042
    @oneeyewillie80424 ай бұрын

    If you know about what America has that means it’s old technology. I’m sure the U.S. already has a gen 6 fighter in the air.

  • @slothknightiv50yearsago52
    @slothknightiv50yearsago524 ай бұрын

    Hi original if you are looking for any cool games to play you should give Elden ring a go it’s an amazing beautiful game and I know you like a challenge so you might like it anyways cool video have an amazing 2024

  • @tripwire3992

    @tripwire3992

    4 ай бұрын

    Lets get him to play metal gear rising revengeance on stream

  • @TheRedStateBlue
    @TheRedStateBlue4 ай бұрын

    the J-20 doesn't really work as intended. It is not much of a threat to an F-35. an F-22 would blow a J-20 out of the sky without much effort.

  • @ValentinoX

    @ValentinoX

    Ай бұрын

    More Than Two-Thirds of America's F-35s CAN'T FLY! kzread.info/dash/bejne/X6Npj6lsh8eZd8Y.html

  • @stevenspinelli3468
    @stevenspinelli34684 ай бұрын

    Budget lol. The Chinese don’t have the budget like the Americans. So they would have to make massive cuts on certain projects to make a single fighter to compete. That’s why they can’t produce better.

  • @bulletproofpepper2
    @bulletproofpepper24 ай бұрын

    Rolls Royce is still built in Britain.

  • @VINEET-lx2ok
    @VINEET-lx2ok4 ай бұрын

    First

  • @captgaming2134
    @captgaming21344 ай бұрын

    The Chinese J20 is not on par with the f22 yet but is on par with the f35, but with advancements in technology in the PLA it could be a few years before it is.

  • @tripwire3992

    @tripwire3992

    4 ай бұрын

    Wrong, the f35 is a stealth aircraft. The j20 is easily detectable

  • @nightraver56

    @nightraver56

    4 ай бұрын

    The F-35x (3 separate fighter capabilities) is significantly ahead of F-22 in electronic warfare & SEAD destruction of sophisticated ground based air defenses. F22 has more thrust & flies higher than F35, both do that better than J20 who's shitty WS-15 engines can't provide even half the thrust of a single F135 Pratt & Whitney engine, and have a lifespan of 20%.

  • @Skelath

    @Skelath

    4 ай бұрын

    Keep in mind the F35 took 2 and a half decades and 1.7 trillion before it was ready for mass production, and the J20 took less than a decade to complete and was ready for mass production in 2017. Another thing to bring up in history is that in WW2 the US mass produced cheaper aircraft over their more expensive ones and mass produced the 2 USD grease gun aka the M3 as it was cheaper and easier to make than the thompson. Another point to note in a lot of key battles specifically the US vs Japan in the Battle of Midway in which out of a stroke of luck and technological advantage the US won as both skill, experience, and numbers were in the Japanese favour, and as much as the US won, in terms of finacial losses the US lost.

  • @roderickrobledo6373
    @roderickrobledo63734 ай бұрын

    Quite a few of these J20's have crashed !

  • @rainz4599

    @rainz4599

    4 ай бұрын

    Quite a few of the F-35's have crashed

  • @miaorenfeng1

    @miaorenfeng1

    2 ай бұрын

    Lots of J-20 shot down by you with your keyboard.😂

  • @aaronyork3995
    @aaronyork39954 ай бұрын

    It has canards Canard= duck in French Raptors kill ducks

  • @nightraver56
    @nightraver564 ай бұрын

    J20 is alot less stealthy tha F35, in the air the F35 will detect & target a J20 long before J20 dectects an F35. The other issue is active radars put out radiation which can be detected. F-35 MADL datalink allows sensor-fusion between 2 or more F-35 of passive sensors so they can triangulate a firing solution, guide a missile to an enemy using their collective passive sensors so there is no radiation at all for an enemy to even be able to detect if they had the capability. Chinas copied J20 ASEA radar is powerful, just one problem: their engine cant make near enough power for the jet, let alone to fully power the APU-power generator so you have a radar thats impressive on a test bench but the airframe engine doesnt provide enough power for it to work. F-35 block 3 & 4 upgrades include an improved higher-output engine to drive a more powerful upgraded ASEA & a whole bunch of new electronic warfare capabilities. And the huge elephant in the room is F35B STOVL which can actually take off vertically if needed but with reduced weapons & fuel. This can land, takeoff & provide surveillance, missile attacks, & electronic warfare from the 000s of small island chains around China in the South China Sea.

Келесі