Nothing hurts more than the 2019 Wimbledon final.

@Reuben_95

2 жыл бұрын

I know I actually have ptsd whenever I see clips

@LaskInHD

2 жыл бұрын

Fed was the better player the entire match, but Djokovic was all time clutch when he needed to be.

@stefanvasilache5252

2 жыл бұрын

Us open 2021 final for djokovic fans😂😂😂😂😂😂

@samehalaa1348

2 жыл бұрын

@@stefanvasilache5252 i feel you mate, Djokovic was about to completely destroy history and win 4 slams in one calendar year which might have been his only chance but he will still win many slams in the next upcoming years and i actually hope he will have another chance to win the 4 slams in one calender year, his only obstacle would be the french open but other than that he can do it.

@stefanvasilache5252

2 жыл бұрын

@@samehalaa1348 i am a Federer fan. Djokovic will win another gs but he won t get the calendar Grand slam

I am a Novak fan, but I won't call Federer mentally weak just because of these losses. You have to look at it in the bigger picture. You don't win 20 slams by being mentally weak. Maybe he is not as mentally strong as Novak and Rafa, but still very strong.

@ismetcehic5581

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly, I'm a Rafa fan and nobody handled Roger better then him, but doesn't make Roger soft, Novak is probably the GOAT when it comes to results and Roger had the highest peak imo and Rafa is the greatest fighter in the Game and the best role model. Roger took this game to another level and everyone has to be grateful to him for thag

@denvercheddie

2 жыл бұрын

@@ismetcehic5581 I think it is debatable that Roger had the highest peak. Compared to the others around him in 2006, yes. But that is subjective. But if you use a more objective statistic such as highest ATP points, that would be Novak. Think of how dominant you have to be to attain 16,950 points. 4 slams = 8000 9 masters = 9000 ATP final = 1500 If you max out all of those, you will have 18,500. Novak had almost 17,000 of those in 2016. Besides, Rafa himself seems to think Novak's peak is higher than Roger's peak.

@yourlarkivist

2 жыл бұрын

People are also forgetting they're 5 years part. Federer's mental game at its best is superior to the other two's mental best.

@catspaw7366

2 жыл бұрын

@@yourlarkivist uhm no. OBJECTIVELY he is the 3rd best out of the Big 3.

@mike04574

2 жыл бұрын

@@catspaw7366 he is the goat

Matches lost after having match point Federer: 24 Me: 0

@sriprakash7245

2 жыл бұрын

It hurts 🥺😭

@yourlarkivist

2 жыл бұрын

Me too!

@noahkhimasia6437

2 жыл бұрын

I have had a few and they haunt me to this day 😂 can’t imagine how much they must hurt in the grand slams

@viksinha5410

2 жыл бұрын

@@noahkhimasia6437 Were they on your serve or your opponent’s?

@noahkhimasia6437

2 жыл бұрын

@@viksinha5410 well I had loads, I think I had about 7 in total and it was a tie break so it was both on the serve and the return, also I had one where I missed an extremely easy shot which was super frustrating. But overall it helped me because next time I was at match point I knew not to get complacent and instead go for it.

Losses after Match point up: Federer: 24 Nadal: 8 Djokovic: 3 (2 of them before 2011)

@projectx5154

Жыл бұрын

Undisputable goat... in choking😂

@SergeRW

Жыл бұрын

didn't know about this statistics, are u sure?

@tennislove6716

Жыл бұрын

@@SergeRWYes, it’s true

@incredibleXMan

Жыл бұрын

That does say something for sure.

@mikemoggerson6651

Жыл бұрын

Wow, that’s wild. Federer is the weakest mentally by far.

Almost every wasted Mp was because of his shaky backhand, either he misses backhand or he is afraid to take backhand and moves to take tough forehand and misses wide... And almost on every Mp, especially vs Djokovic and Rafa, he just changes his expression, he starts to shake his arm and he looks pretty disconnected... Too bad, if he was a little bit more mentally tough, he would be even greater... Still my favorite player🙂

@kailashpatel1706

2 ай бұрын

The two MPS in 2019 at nothing to do with that BH?, it was not serving outwide..

Federer never really mastered mentality in big matches with Nadal and Djokovic. He was one of the worst teen tennis players in terms of mentality. Prior to 2002, he is just a Tsitsipas on court.

Wimbledon 2019 will hurt forever. Nobody in mens tennis choked harder in a wimbledon final than Fed that day.

@marcob2250

2 жыл бұрын

Also cemented him as definitely not the Goat. Goats don't choke under pressure. Also opened the way for Djokovic to chase down every single one of his records. He might even get 9 Wimbledons at this rate as there is no competition on grass...

@thetable5636

2 жыл бұрын

@@marcob2250 yeah but goats don't smash racquets at the Olympics either

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

Perhaps these statistics will serve as balm? 🙂 What is interesting about the Federer-Djokovic rivalry (and, in fact, every Federer H2H rivalry) are the finer "in-match" stats and their comparison to the grosser "results" stats. For example, the Djoker-Fed rivalry is 27-23 in the Djoker's favour (11-6 in slams) ... but (and here's the rub), *_several important in-match statistics tilt in Federer's favour_* . For example, Federer's points dominance (PD) ratio is 1.02, his game dominance (GD) ratio is 1.01, his total points won is 50.2%, his total games won is 50.4%, and his total sets won is 50%. In other words, *_Federer is better than or equal to the Djoker in 5 of tennis's most important in-match categories_* . Now these might seem to be trivial in the larger scheme of things (after all, only the result matters, right?) or like hair-splitting on the part of a Federer fan, but they become important considerations when one is discussing if Djokovic is really a greater tennis _player_ ( as opposed to _winner_ ) than Federer. Because - *_to have a healthy lead in such a large H2H set (50 matches!) and still trail in these in-match statistics is so rare as to be almost singular_* . [Take into consideration Djokovic's 6-years (!) age-advantage and how he only began to lead the H2H in early 2016 (and to pull away in 2018) and it makes perfect sense to say that the Fed is the greater _player_ and the (slightly) lesser _winner_ .] This rarity of Federer's is made more apparent by a look at these very statistics in the case of the Djokovic-Nadal H2H. In this case, the leader of the H2H category (again, the Djoker) also leads the in-match stats: with a PD ratio of 1.04, a GD ratio of 1.09, a total points won of 50.7%, a total games won of 51%, and a total sets won of 52.3%. This sort of correspondence in "leads" is what is expected - what Federer has done against Djokovic goes completely against most people's assumptions about the performance of the player who leads the H2H. And this is not a one-off! Just as interesting are the in-match stats of a couple of Federer's other negative H2Hs against current players, namely, Thiem and Zverev. Despite the H2H match count being low (just seven each) and despite trailing Thiem 2-5 and Zverev 3-4, his in-match stats (PD, GD, percent points won) is still greater than or equal to that of both players! Indeed, the only (relevant) player Federer trails in these in-match stats is Rafa - and even there, the skew is much less than the 16-24 H2H skew. For instance, Federer's PD ratio is 0.97 and his total points won is 49.4%! The point of all of this? That H2Hs can be "deceptive"; that Federer is almost indisputably the greatest in-match player in tennis history (as well as the most profligate with BPs and MPs); and that the player who wins the match is not necessarily the greater or the better tennis player. To conclude: 1) The Djoker is the best, most consistent player at the moment ; 2) His lead in the H2H against Federer simply indicates that he is the better closer; _not_ that he is the better tennis _player_ ; 3) Given Rafa's (extra)-skewed dominance on clay, his lopsided H2H against the Djoker on HC, and Federer's resurgence against him since 2017, Djokovic's real rival (in overall statistics and records) is a six-years-older Fed rather than Rafa ; 4) Fed's better "in-match" performance over 50 matches against Djokovic makes a very strong case for his status as the greater *tennis **_player_* ( and the slightly lesser *tennis **_winner_* ) of the two. P.S: My fascination with these in-match statistics kind of began after Wimbledon 2019 - a match which, as far as I'm concerned, Fed "won", just not _officially_ . Watching Fed (officially) lose a match he "won" got me looking into the finer match stats. What I found therein confirmed my impression of Federer - *_as Novak's greatest rival over the past decade (despite being 6 years older) and as the finest in-match player in tennis history_* . I'm not saying this makes him the GOAT (which is mostly a futile, emotion-driven argument) - but it most certainly lends factual heft to the popular belief that Federer is the greatest player (in the "tennising" sense) to have played the game (so far). That he plays with a such a sui generis flair and artistry is the icing on the cake. Trivia: 1. The Djoker and the Fed have met four times on grass. The Djoker leads the H2H 3-1, but here are Fed's in-match statistics: PD = 1.04, GD = 1.19, Total points won = 50.4%, Games won = 51%. 2. In Bof3 matches, the Fed-Djoker H2H is 16-16 (with matches played between 2006-2019). For these 33 matches, the in-match statistics for the Fed are: PD = 1.05; GD = 1.15; BP ratio = 1.05 (he even leads this against possibly the game's greatest returner...confirming my opinion that Fed's return is highly underrated); total points won = 50.6%; games won = 51.5%; sets won = 52.6%. In short, *_the Fed leads the Djoker in every one of these categories_* , an astonishing feat. 3. For all Djokovic's acclaimed brilliance on hard courts (he leads Nadal 20-7!), the Fed is basically his equal on the surface, with their H2H being 20-18 in the Djoker's favour (7-4 in Bof5 and 13-14 in Bof3). As for the in-match stats ... it's "deja vu all over again" with Fed having a PD = 1.02, GD = 1.02, (BP ratio = 0.98), total points won = 50.2%, games won = 50.7%, sets won = 51.9%. Truly - if Fed had the remarkable "nervelessness" of Djokovic (or perhaps even that of Rafa), god knows how many of the important matches would have gone his way! So yes, a statement talking about Fed's propensity to waste MPs (and, therefore, lose) would be reductive ... if there wasn't so much hard evidence that the Fed has shown himself to be the _superior in-match player_ (across 50 matches!) with a marked tendency of getting nervous at crucial moments. I mean, if Fed had had the "nerve(lessness)" to convert those MPs from the three slam matches against the Djoker - he would lead the Djoker 26-24 in their overall H2H; lead him 9-8 in their Grand Slam H2H; and lead him 21-19 in the slam count ... but he didn't convert them, that's that, and here we are. However, this long write-up is to emphasiz that you shouldn't ever let the H2H or slam titles fool you into believing anything _except_ the fact that Djokovic is the "mentally stronger" (a term I don't care for) and "more nerveless " (I prefer this term) tennis player of the two. Not the "greater". Indeed, *_I will reiterate my opinion that Federer is the greater tennis player of the two_* - not simply because of his aesthetics and "flair" but because he has achieved his records while playing an attacking all-court game that offers much less margin for error (than Djokovic's) _and_ being six years older than Djokovic. Stats courtesy: www.ultimatetennisstatistics.com/headToHead?playerId1=3819&playerId2=4920

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

​@@marcob2250 Uh, not quite. It simply confirmed that the Fed is more prone to nerves than the Djoker is (and Nadal too, pre-2017) - something Fed fans always knew. Yes, it _did_ allow the Djoker to close the GS gap and continue to dominate, but, as my post with the stats below show, that was about all it did. The Djoker is closer to the Fed than Nadal (in terms of being an all-surface player), but his attritional style and glaring lack of an all-court game - he may be getting better now but 90% of his winning has been based on attrition - mean that he will never reach Federer's height as a tennis _player_ ... and he knows it. In any case, I'm sure he prefers the titles. However, what's made the Fed stand out all these long years is his *_utterly unique_* combination of winning ability and aesthetic attractiveness.

@henrystradling8485

2 жыл бұрын

honestly I'll never forget this momnent... he had 2 match points for a GS title

It's just incredible. Most of them, he has himself to blame.

@mantaishere

2 жыл бұрын

E-X-A-C-T-L-Y.

@peolfpetler8500

Жыл бұрын

Tbf Vs Djokovic he had an opportunity and he took it, but it didn't end as it should have. Then Djokovic didn't give him the same chance again.

@unowen7591

Жыл бұрын

Yup. Better player, all stats on his side. Just missed the crucial points

@schwozluv8364

Жыл бұрын

@@unowen7591better player LOOOOOOL I can’t tell if you’re trolling or not. The better player won the matches

@unowen7591

Жыл бұрын

@@schwozluv8364 he was the better player. More aggressive, more opportunities. He had set points in every set I believe, and was ahead of Novak in every stat. Djokovic won the match only because he hung on and made Roger break himself. Of course Roger was the better player throughout the match.

Rome 2006 is ridiculous, he bottled 2 MP with two unforced errors and he also had a 5-3 lead in the tiebreaker which he also bottled with unforced errors, Federer gifted that one.

@VojkanTrifunovic

Жыл бұрын

Thats one of the reasons he never won in Rome in his life...

@echochamber1234

Жыл бұрын

to be fair, Nadal wasn't gifting anything either. if fed wasn't going for broke, he never would have had that lead in the first place.

@ConstantDistraction

Жыл бұрын

Going for broke gave him the Aussie Open title in '17. If he had figured out taking the ball early to disrupt Nadal's rhythm sooner, he may have multiple French Open titiels.

@saikat93ify

Жыл бұрын

@@ConstantDistraction Lol. Australian Open 2017 was not a rout. It was an extremely close match, which Nadal also almost won. So it's completely untrue to extrapolate that to winning French Open.

@martinlindhardt8410

Жыл бұрын

and to make matters worse, he never won that tournament. Reached four finals, and 2006 was of course when he came closest

The Anderson's one is more unbelievable than wimbledon 2019, and incredible for Anderson's comeback

@whowantstoknow401

Жыл бұрын

Agreed. A gift

@RFRNND

Жыл бұрын

@@PiotrWolski-eo7wq well he had match point to won that match 3 sets to 0 and lost 2 sets to 3, pretty incredible, then the wb 2019 it was more competed

it's weird how he lost 2018 and 2019 wimbledon, 2011 and 2010 us open.

@seytannavukat9205

2 жыл бұрын

he'd probably lose Nadal to us opens but he coulda stopped Djokovic's rebirth in 2018

@slytlion

2 жыл бұрын

@@seytannavukat9205 yes true. he's weak mentally comparing to rafa and nole but he's damn skillful you can't say he's not as great as they are

@ha-qg2ug

2 жыл бұрын

@@slytlion He's definitely more talented. Both Djoko and Nadal play efficient defensive tennis, but Federer is an attacking, artistic player.

@slytlion

2 жыл бұрын

@@ha-qg2ug yeah of course if he got rafa or nole's mental strength and will, he would be the greatest in stats by far

@mikemoggerson6651

Жыл бұрын

@@ha-qg2ugmental strength is a talent. Fed’s backhand was inconsistent and his baseline game had a few holes in it. There isn’t inherently more “talent” in one style or the other.

being a roger's fan & see how strange the choices he makes during important moments sadden me & that's prolly the dark thing in roger (mental fragility)

@yourlarkivist

2 жыл бұрын

It's not mental fragility. It's the crowd expectations that get in your head, which is arguably more unnerving than if the crowd was against you. You can't imagine the amount of pressure he has in these moments when the world wants and expects you to seal it, and in your head you start to fear disappointing them. With great success comes great failures, that's all legends.

@vaibhavathalye7542

Жыл бұрын

One doesn't win 20 majors with mental fragility

@donvito7344

Жыл бұрын

@@yourlarkivistcrowd for you >>> crowd against you😊

@dominiquetaser6809

Жыл бұрын

Mental fragility?!

@mtesgearcruot6753

Жыл бұрын

@@yourlarkivist yeah it's more easy to play with crowd against like Djokovic he thinks ain't got nothing to lose without expectatives

Djokovic was the big nightmare turning almost lost matches

@trumpameri1638

2 жыл бұрын

NEMESIS 👽👽👽

"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I've been trusted to take the game-winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." - M. Jordan Being GOAT doesn't mean you have the least failures. It's incredible how he's able to come back from these embarrassing losses for two decades, let alone dominate. Love and respect Roger. Always!

@AntaresHighlander

2 жыл бұрын

Very nice, but he's the GOAT only in your heart. Statistics say otherwise.

@rodriguerra3639

2 жыл бұрын

@@AntaresHighlander statistics still saying Federer is the GOAT

@mariomuslim6029

2 жыл бұрын

@@rodriguerra3639 he is tied

@yourlarkivist

2 жыл бұрын

@@AntaresHighlander You can pick your own GOAT by stats, that's cool. There's no right metric by now with someone's who transcended tennis like Roger.

@catspaw7366

2 жыл бұрын

Funny thing is 5 years ago when Roger was leading the race the parameters of being the Greatest were numbers, stats and facts. Fast forward to 2021 Novak surpassed him in almost every RELEVANT categories. Now all of a sudden the sport became tennis/ dancing/ ballet/ beauty contest/ Miss Universe. Even rolex made a fool out of themselves by advocating it is beyond facts and stats now, numbers don't matter anymore. I mean really rolex? 🥴😂

Few weeks ago some former tennis player or some kind of journalist said that Federer is one of the most decorated athlete ever, he has won a lot of extraordinary tournaments but also he is one of the biggest losers EVER. As a Federer fan I must admit that's true.

LOL. Back to back tournaments he lost matches when he had a match point, in IW and Miami 2010. Totally forgot about those, especially the Baghdatis one.

Many a choke I've seen Expected and unforeseen But none as pristine As 40-15.

@luc7054

3 жыл бұрын

God I wonder how the big 3 don't hate their fans

@DimitarFCBM

3 жыл бұрын

@@luc7054 Djokovic fans as arrogant as their idol. Nothing new

@Reuben_95

2 жыл бұрын

That’s good

@rishirahul6410

2 жыл бұрын

lol, at least fed choked in a 5 setter match and didn't let madvedev wipe the court with his arse in straight sets.

@Jordothecat98

2 жыл бұрын

In a few months he’ll have reached 21 in Melbourne, meaning he’ll have more slams, masters and weeks at number 1 than the weak era champ. So save your tears till then :)

The Anderson match was an absolute mess. Wimbledon 2019 vs Djokovic ended his career, but the Anderson match a year prior damaged him mentally beyond repair. In fact since 2018 he won Miami and nothing else of relevance.

Mr.40-15

@trumpameri1638

2 жыл бұрын

Trilogy 🤣🤣🤣

@max19752

8 күн бұрын

@@trumpameri1638 Saga)

40 - 15 trilogy Hollywood movie scenario blockbuster ... 👽👽👽

Considering he's played around 1000 matches since 2005 he's only lost 3 matches on his own service game from Novak twice and Del potro once. You'd actually have to say he's actually a really clutch player.

@zy9662

Жыл бұрын

Yes and i would count the Anderson match as the worst offender of their MP losses

@eFMe-fk1xh

5 ай бұрын

No, I wont say that. I think he's mentally fragile for an All Time Great, and for a very precise reason: too much talent. He was the most talented player to ever play, and that's how he mainly won. Pure talent (and obviously crucial factors like dedication, hunger, and fitness). But when you are so talented, and so worshiped, your mental strength is almost never challenged. We must consider that Fed was treated as a true GOD in his peak, by anyone. Not easy to be humble and focused in those circumstances. Especially against Djokovic, everytime he truly felt the "fear" of losing (again), and that led him to basically self destructing many times.

@scottwarren4998

3 ай бұрын

Why don't you count tiebreaks and then lose match? tiebreaks matter too.

@idrisahmed2659

13 күн бұрын

​@eFMe-fk1xh very true and being the most talented also meant the most expectation to win .... And when the entire stadium gets behind u to win a crucial point 2 things can happen u take that energy and deliver or 2nd and in most cases u think what if I don't make this point what if I don't deliver on the expectations the crowd has on me and this can make u lose clarity and u end up losing .... I believe this is exactly what happened with Roger all throughout his career .... Being the fan favourite always didn't help his cause hence the most losses after having match points among the big 3 .... Novak didn't have any such expectations doesn't even have now .... Even now people rally behind alcaraz than with Novak ... Dude always comes up against the crowd ..... I firmly believe that if Novak had the kind of support Roger got even he would have buckled under the crowds expectations .....

I just lost a match being up 5-3 40:15 in the decider so I’m watching this to feel better 😂

Nadal was waiting for Federer in the us open final 2010 and 2011 ! but Federer failed twice in a row against same opponent from match point ! yet we are waiting for a us open match between Nadal and Federer that never happened !

@neb6208

2 жыл бұрын

@Douglas Mortimer nadal did get to him, and roger lost his grand slam matches against him nearly everytime 😂

@NamTran-xc2ip

Жыл бұрын

@Douglas Mortimer in 2004 when Nadal's a kid at 18? What's the point of your comment?

@ashleythomas4112

Жыл бұрын

Rafa was waiting in 2013 and 2017 at the US Open as well to play Fed but Roger lost to Robredo and Del Potro respectively.

@donvito7344

Жыл бұрын

The „opponent“ is the greatest have some respect

@robertservant1936

Жыл бұрын

@@ashleythomas4112 Nadal lost in 2008 to Murray - would have played Roger in US Open final. Nadal lost to Del Potro in 2009, would have played Federer in US Open Final - what's your point.

Wow 2010 was such a shitty year/////I mean 4 matches lost where he had match points in one year, that is not something you see too often from the top guys. And two of them were even back to nack tournaments( iw and miami)....Federer really was hit by some doubts and struggled with his confidence during thath period.

@Masterdoctorgenius14

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, he should have been on a high after the AO that year. I think he caught some illness when he visted africa for foundation work.

@Noname-rj6gw

2 жыл бұрын

@@Masterdoctorgenius14 Yup, he had some rare disease called 40:15

Wimbledon 19 will go down as the worse one since it had the most signigance. Roger acts like he don't care and he's mature but converting that match point would mean he finally beat Novak and Nadal in a slam. Have a record 9 Wimbledons which would probably not be broken since novak would still be on 4. Tie the h2h on grass with novak at 2-2. Become the oldest winner at Wimbledon at 38. A huge gap between his first and last Wimbledon along with his other grass records. He would undoubtedly be the greatest grass player of all time. Yet all that was gone in a blink of an eye.

@guilhermestringheta2902

Жыл бұрын

Djokovic was way too consistent trough his career to not be the goat, federer after 2009 was extremely inconstant, and rafa with the injuries, 2014-2016 period, etc. Nole just never has an off period like the other two

@dewman7477

Ай бұрын

@@guilhermestringheta2902you forgot before 2011 Federer and Nadal were clear duo

@idrisahmed2659

13 күн бұрын

The expectations and the crowd getting so violently behind him got to him ..... People often take the mentality of a player as an individuals strength or weakness without considering the surrounding factors ... At that very moment of match point Novak was nowhere the fan favourite was just trying to survive and play out that game but Roger on the other hand was clearly burdened by the crowds expectations..... Being an underdog relieves u with all of this pressure.... Even when Novak was on Match point the crowd was backing Roger .... So Novak one less thing to worry about meeting the crowds expectations .... And like u said Roger might act as if he is not affected by the loss but right then and there he had to meet the biggest expectation to meet and it got to him .... Maybe if the crowd has just stayed silent instead of shouting like maniacs Roger would have still won

Safin - shouldnt have gone for the tweener Gasquet - make the forehand Nadal - make the forehand Baghdatis - make the forehand Berdych miami - well played by Berdych Djokovic us open 10 - well played by Djokovic Monfils - make the forehand Djokovic us open 11 - make the forehand Berdych dubai - make the backhand Chardy - well played by Chardy Kyrgios - backhand wasnt that easy but couldve made it Thiem - volley wasnt that easy but couldve made it Donskoy - make the backhand Haas - should make the backhand Del Potro - shouldnt have gone for the drop shot Anderson - good play by Anderson but should at least make him hit a volley Thiem - could have made one of those backhands Djokovic wb 19 - make first forehand or hit a backhand Basilashvili - tough shot, maybe couldve made him hit a volley

Fantastic compilation.

@pedroalvim711

2 жыл бұрын

Sad compilation

@projectx5154

Жыл бұрын

Just a beautiful sight of Fedophiles crying in comments 🥰

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

@@projectx5154well he accomplished a lot and people hate him and mock him for it that’s rent free

Federer disliked this video

After watching this video, looks like Federer is a chronic match point waster! He missed so many of them, because of his own mistakes. He gets complacent when sees the finish line, and drops his game.

@wojciechreczkowski7306

5 ай бұрын

łzy i żal... a

2011 US open and Wimbledon 2019 he served for the match and lost it.

Crazy to say he actually underachieved because of this

The truth after many years still R F failed to adjust his mental toughness in crucial time.

Federer's level has never been the same since 2010. I think there were defeats that marked him a lot, especially those at Wimbledon 2008 and Australia 2009. Not to mention the one at Wimbledon 2019. That ended his career. Of course, he never worked on the mental part at the level of Djokovic or Nadal. He always trusted more in his natural talent.

@mikemoggerson6651

Жыл бұрын

Fed was a poor problem solver, and could never grind like the other 2. As you say, he relied on talent more than anything. As far as the comment about his level dropping, I strongly disagree. There’s piles of evidence to show that Fed’s level didn’t suddenly drop, it was more because Djokovic and Nadal (particularly Djokovic) started to dominate him mentally. He won 4 slams after 2010, and 3 of those came when Djokovic was injured in 2017-2018. He could’ve won 10-12 slams in this era had Djokovic not existed. He was consistently going far in slams and was ranked highly.

@MarioBeart

Жыл бұрын

I agree. If I look at his wins, 2004-2005 were insane. Those are not numbers of a mentally fragile player, however for someone of his caliber he lost too many matches like this, and since Nadal and especially Djokovic happened he definitely de-evolved mentally, got scared or, even better, the other two stood up as even stronger than him. There's no doubt mentally he was the weaker of the three.

@ErikCB912

Жыл бұрын

The loss to Delpo at the US Open 2009 final was where Federer started to fade.

@jeremiahh.3383

11 ай бұрын

​@@mikemoggerson6651I totally disagree. Watch Fed Djok 2015 Wimbledon The commentator mentions that Federer's recent Grand Slam issues had been that he couldn't sustain his level later in the matches anymore and errors would pile up.

@mikemoggerson6651

11 ай бұрын

@@jeremiahh.3383 Djokovic hasn’t had that problem 😂 he’s 2 years older than Fed was in 2016, yet Fed in 2016 was blowing a 2-0 lead to Raonic at Wimbledon 😂😂

Wimbledon 2008 against Nadal, us opens 2010 vs djokovic then again 2011 vs djokovic sealed the deal. Mentally reached a new level of choke that he never recovered from

@guilhermestringheta2902

Жыл бұрын

The nail in the coffin for his confidence was 2009, losing to nadal in australia and del potro in US changed his career, he was never the dominant player he once was

Now we need every match won facing match points :-) It's exactly the same number if you include Laver Cup: 24-24.

@mattiaarseni4684

2 жыл бұрын

Never in the clutch

@projectx5154

Жыл бұрын

Laver cup doesn't count😂

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

@@mattiaarseni4684literally in clutch

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

@@projectx5154ok 23-24 still incredible

The worst one really is RF vs Kevin Anderson Wimbledon 2018. 2-0 and 5-4 receiving with break point / match point. And in a rally - couldn't get it. Loses the third and fourth. Marathon fifth, marathon match. Kevin is a great player but made the last eight of a grand slam three times - RF was the overwhelming favourite at age 36.

@sreeramvudayagiri8994

Жыл бұрын

It really shows the mental strength of Anderson, fighting so long from 1:58 (Fed’s MP) to 4:13 (Kevin’s MP) to recover from that huge deficit

Djokovic played like this only after 2011 late 2012. Before, even though he won slam trophy, he did not have that lasting quality. It is only after his diagnosis with gluten.....that he suddenly was able to last. Odd, given that he had success already, but was not consistent. Something helped him, and it wasn't diet, ,shaved head, psychologist, or faith, or his chldren's love. Neither wolf spirit nor wooden cross achieved this. Potion, lotion. Remember, Djokovic before had breathing issues, retired early, etc. Then he had operation on his nose, then he relied on a wooden cross around his neck from a Serb monk/priest who called him the savior of Serbia, then it was the wolf spirit, yoga, and finally the sickness that made him strong. Pray tell, why so many crutches? Mind power claim is a crutch too, that relies on something else.

Choker

SO MENTALLY WEAK HE ONLY WON 20 GRAND SLAMS ❤ YOU CANT KNOCK THIS GREAT CHAMPION ❤ LOVE FROM A RAFAEL NADAL FANATIC AND BIG ADMIRER OF NOVAK ❤

Mr. 15-40 lol !

And that's it, On a massive miss hit.

2019 Wimbledon Final could have been the most storybook finish to a sporting career ever seen, he would have announced his retirement there and then

This video makes me both angry and sad at the same time. This is the reason Djokovic will surpass Federer as the all time greatest.

@projectx5154

Жыл бұрын

He already did

@adityasharma-ps6hl

Жыл бұрын

Djokovic will never be the GOAT

@roljavi

Жыл бұрын

@@adityasharma-ps6hl Numbers don't care about your feelings.

@TheseHoesAreLoyal

Жыл бұрын

@@adityasharma-ps6hl that's your opinion which doesn't matter

@idrisahmed2659

13 күн бұрын

Being an underdog thorought your career does help ...

From this list the most frustrating are against Djokovic

Im soley clicking on this video not to finish it, but to make this comment that it's way too painful to see these again lmaoo

Wimbledon final 2019 😭

@trumpameri1638

2 жыл бұрын

Part 3 of greatest 40 - 15 trilogy

With the way crowd treats djokovic he is the goat, the mentality is unbelievable.

@idrisahmed2659

13 күн бұрын

Lol it's easier to win when the crowd is always against u than when it's with u .... Expectations my friend can be a huge burden to carry .... Roger always had that burden to deliver because the crowd was strongly backing him to win .... I don't know if u have played a sport or performed under pressure when all the eyes around u are watching and waiting for u to win .... Ull win no doubt but most of the times the pressure of expectations is too much to take .... Novak being the underdog always he didn't have doubts creeping in his mind at crucial moments .... So I commend rogers mentality more than novaks

Djokovic destroy his carrer

@souvikjha8242

2 жыл бұрын

And ur english will destroy ur career

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

Just rent free

pretty crazy that fed has lost atleast one match a year from 2010-2021 except 2012 and 2020 which makes sense cause in 2020 he only played 6 matches

No wonder why Djokovic is the ultimate GOAT

@JL-fh4qw

2 жыл бұрын

Well we just watched him choke horribly in 2021 US Open. Federer choked match points but I don't think he ever choked for an entire match.

@souvikjha8242

2 жыл бұрын

@@JL-fh4qw best comment I support u

@vantungnguyen2694

2 жыл бұрын

madrid 09?

@demonking4883

2 жыл бұрын

@@JL-fh4qw cry

@xdbruhxd1179

Жыл бұрын

@@JL-fh4qw how was 2021 us open a choke? There were no tiebreaks and it was over in three sets

Actually I think that Rome match in 06 really destroyed something in his way of finishing matches. Missing those two fairly "easy" forehands did change his way of finishing matches. I recon he used to be very agressive on his MP or closing games but he kinda stoped doing that after 08. ( GS matches against Rafa or delpo in 09 he was very passive in the 5th) You could argue about it but is surely cost him several matches when he began to try not to miss instead of pushing it many times on pressure points, witch is not his style of play. Anyway all the big 4 lost matches after having MP 😂❤❤❤

Man what a luck for Federer. US open being the most unlucky for Nole despite that he was able to come back from MP down and that to back to back. Guess that 40-15 joke isn't all just talk 😂.

why is the screen black?

I'm sure Wimbledon 2019 won't be on this list. He's way too good to let that one slip 😅.

His unforced errors to force opponents to give up was the downfall. If he played clean rally and forced his opponents to do extraordinary things, would have been different story. His panic cost him 10 grandslams.

@syaodrey8086

9 ай бұрын

А чего не 20?

2010 was not a good year for Federer with match points.

To think that Federer always have the crowd support wherever he plays. It’s like when it’s clutch time, that’s when he gets nervous and screws up. Imagine if he gets booed or heckled when he slips or stumbles. I don’t think he can win those 20 slam titles.

@akshayakki670

3 жыл бұрын

lol ,that’s the Complete opposite my friend, when u are losing or ur down then the crowd support helps But when u are winning the crowd support makes u nervous and tight ..Roger has been having the highest crowd following than anyone and when he is winning (at big titles) he often gets nervous and right. You can look his speech of 2018 AO final ..he just said “U are the guys who make me nervous”.

@theaustrianart-teacher8787

2 жыл бұрын

He was litalary won againts agassi in 2005 in a close match soo bulshit

@thebigmonstaandy6644

2 жыл бұрын

@@theaustrianart-teacher8787 so 1 match is enough for a proof?

@theaustrianart-teacher8787

2 жыл бұрын

@@thebigmonstaandy6644 hewiit? Roddick? Nadal?

@theaustrianart-teacher8787

2 жыл бұрын

@@thebigmonstaandy6644 Prime roddick is as good as murray and nadal is nadal and agassi was still very solid in 2004-2005 not a Bad Player at all

Brutal video ;) Good job.

That Lady with a finger up was so happy for a moment. How she must have hated Novak after that final. 🥳🥳🥳

A true weak era champion.

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

Like Djokovic isn’t taking advantage of current weak era for last 4 years lol 😂

great channel you have!

also laver cup 2022

For me Roger Is the most talented tenis player ever, pitifully he missed too much in crucial moments

16:39 The match that took Federer out of the goat race. Rafa could do the same to Novak this Sunday if they both make it through to the final. 😀

@sladjamircic7363

Жыл бұрын

Nole has 23 going for 24 know

So he wasted about 40 mps in his career And some of it he was 40-15 up

Fed has the record for most matches lost while having match points; and being the gentleman that he is, Novak Djokovic congratulates him for it.

19 matches lost after match points.. it clearly shows how mentally weak Federer is..

@JackOfBlades8642

2 жыл бұрын

Spot on, Rafa & Nole are mental beasts & it's what makes them better players in my opinion. Just take a look at the last two days. 🤣 Federer is a goat & probably the most influential Tennis player of all time but Rafa & Nole are better.

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

Wow a weak mentality that helped him set records and win a lot of titles and slams lol 😆

@idrisahmed2659

12 күн бұрын

Lol out of all three big 3's ... Roger was the one who had most expectations to win meaning he was the fan favourite by a big margin especially when playing against Novak ..... I bet if Novak too had the same expectations from the crowd to always deliver he would have crossed the crucial moments ..... With huge expectations comes huge responsibility and lucky for Novak he had no such responsibility ever ...

the problem with fed is not that he loses on those MPS, everyone does but he never resets after that. in 2010 and 11 USO semies yes he lost those MPs but then didn't win a game.

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

He reset after Wimbledon 2019, though. Almost broke the Djoker at 11-11 to give himself another chance to serve for the match...but got nervous _yet_ again. The tiebreak that followed was a foregone conclusion. That said, his inability to reset at deuce (after he'd missed the two MPs) was very unfortunate. He did in the semis against Rafa (because Rafa no longer "intimidated him mentally") but he couldn't against the Djoker. Still, what a match he played! One for the ages. All the Djoker did was _hang on_ , all match long. That gave him the "win" but it was an almost-38 y.o Fed who gave us the tennis...like he almost always does. The greatest tennis _player_ (though not winner) and a revealer of a whole new dimension of tennis's aesthetics, the Fed is sui generis.

@udaygadge6064

2 жыл бұрын

@@thesoccergod He's not the GOAT and djoker just didn't hang in there, he was far more clutch than roger and not to mention he was actually a break up in that final set but he also choked it except he quickly reset. Fed was playing some of the best tennis but still couldn't beat novak who in all honesty was just playing quite averge but extremely clutch.

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

@@udaygadge6064 Sure, if that's how you'd rather look at it. I, on the other hand, was being objective. Also - the Djoker wasn't "clutch" on the MPs; rather the Fed got nervous. There's a (subtle) difference between the two. I do agree, though, that he played the 3rd and 5th set TBs very well indeed. It would be fair to call it "clutch" if it wasn't for the fact that it's much easier to be cool when you're playing defence rather than offence. As for whether one of the two was playing below-average or above-average or just average on _that day_ , it doesn't matter. (Why? Because saying so means offering no credit to either player, a rather unfair thing to do.) Instead, what any objective observer would (and the stats do) attest to is that *_the match was on Fed's racquet all evening long_* . Which basically amounts to saying that the Djoker "hung in there". Good for him for doing so - but don't let's pretend that wasn't what he did (when he himself admitted it was in his post-match interview).

@udaygadge6064

2 жыл бұрын

@@thesoccergod he was clutch, I can’t think of any other player who’d have made those returns match points down or the FH pass. Yes roger choked but still.. and yes it doesn’t matter if he was playing average, he won same goes for fed he was playing well but he lost. At the end of the day all you can say is Novak was better that day.

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

@@udaygadge6064 Hahah. Well, that's kind of my point - that "at the end of the day", you _can_ say the Fed was the better player overall...who just wasn't "destined" to win. Sure, "closing" is the most important part of any non-zero-sum game, but all it does is determine who the _winner_ is. It doesn't (and isn't meant to) determine who the better _player_ is. Usually they're the same person, but occasionally, the person who _played_ better _does_ lose. Wimby 2019 was one such occasion.

Federer cementing his status as the GCOAT. Greatest chokerer of all time 😌

@bean8447

2 жыл бұрын

no

@jeroenvermunt862

2 жыл бұрын

And still able to win 20 slams and breaking so many records. What are you talking about?

@user-tk3hb6ui2o

2 жыл бұрын

@@jeroenvermunt862 what record? How don't have shit

@user-tk3hb6ui2o

2 жыл бұрын

Novak has more masters, every masters twice, better h2h, weeks in no1, and in a matter of time, he will have most slams

@bean8447

2 жыл бұрын

bro, shut up

incredible choker Roger

Beautiful.

So Glad he Lost after having Match Point 😂

Only -ve thing federer had was in tight moments federer tends to rush his shots which works against him , anyway who am i to point out the GOD and GOAT of tennis.

Great video. Thank you. People may find it funny, but I think all these matches (and the way they played out before and after the MPs) only provide more evidence that Fed is the greatest tennis _player_ of the post-wooden-racquet era ( note how I say _player_ , not _winner_ ) and *easily* the most consistent and greatest "in-match player" to have ever played the game of tennis. Imagine if he'd won Roma 2006 and Wimbledon 2019 - the former a match where he was the slightly better player; the second a match where he was the overwhelmingly *_dominant_* player. Winning Roma would have *_made him the first player to beat Nadal on clay over 5 sets_* ! Winning Wimbledon would have been *the cherry on top of the cake* that was one of his greatest, most astonishing all-court performances against this era's greatest returner-of-serve (who he bamboozled all evening long) and the most attritional, winningest player of the last decade. As it was, we may have missed the cherry but don't forget that we got the _whole_ cake. So, Fed fans: it's easier said than done, but (try to) go back and watch Wimbledon 2019 again. Go back and watch tennis's greatest aesthete play, at age 37, one of the greatest matches of his illustrious career. Forget the loss (again easier said than done) for it was _destiny_ and, instead, just enjoy watching the Fed play some sublime tennis. P.S: Again, people may laugh, but if Fed recovers fully (a *big* "if") and returns, I predict that - a) he'll win another slam; and b) he'll overtake Connors's matches-won record (and possibly his title-record). Why? Because it's about time destiny worked in his favour! 😁

@viksinha5410

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed with everything except for Fed playing sublime tennis. I wouldn't call it sublime; it was definitely worse than his performance against Nadal in the SF. I would say that both players played a high level except for Novak in the second set and Fed in the tiebreaks.

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

@@viksinha5410 Is that right? I don't fully remember the match, but I do know that he hit 94 winners (including 27 aces), a remarkable number against tennis's top returner-of-serve and it's most attritional baseline-returner. And some of those winners _were_ sublime. But perhaps I'm remembering his play as better than it was...on account of the numbers. I mean - 67 in-point winners against the Djoker!

@viksinha5410

2 жыл бұрын

@@thesoccergod A lot of those winners came in the second set which Novak completely tanked. And winners aren't the only criteria for a player playing well. There is also forced errors, which I believe Djokovic had more of. And yes, Federer did have some sublime winners, as did Novak. It is just that Novak's came at more crucial times.

@thesoccergod

2 жыл бұрын

@@viksinha5410 Ah. Well, the Djoker's ability to force an error is well known. The problem is that a lot of the Fed's errors (against whoever) are unforced. As for Novak's winners - the only one I remember is the backhand DTL he hit at 12-12, 5-3 in the tiebreak. Unsurprisingly, it was possibly his most important one. That said, the Djoker's play - winners or not - is so metronomic that there's little that stands out (besides some of his wonderful short-angle forehand crosscourts). Indeed, the _only_ shot of Novak's I can remember being properly "wowed" by was a backhand DTL in the third set against Rafa at RG 2021, hit from about a metre or so behind the baseline as he stretched out into an almost-split. I can't remember the score exactly, but it may be one of the most remarkable shots I've ever seen hit.

@viksinha5410

2 жыл бұрын

​@@thesoccergod Agreed Novak's play is a bit metronomic. Nevertheless, he is a great champion and we have been blessed to witness an era with him, Federer, and Nadal

Rome, Rome, Rome... sigh.

Wow. I wonder how many slams would he have actually won had he faced the crowd's opposition like, ahem, another player. 10? Maybe 12?

@SebastianKopacz

Жыл бұрын

Crown opposition can be much more motivating. You play as if you have nothing to lose anyways, while with the crowd support it takes you to a level of nervousness you and I cannot imagine.

more than a half MP for federer he is playing like in hurry . He was going for the points . He made some stupid errors . He is not young kid but he played like that in half MP

This is what happened when you're on the top and everyone is expecting you to be a champion in every tournaments. quite opposite with his opponents. they've nothing to lose against him.

@mikemoggerson6651

Жыл бұрын

He has a 30% win rate against Nole and Rafa in slams. He was expected to lose lol. He won 4 slams after Djokovic turned 22. 3 of those came when Djokovic was injured and mostly absent from 2017-2018. The debate is over. 23>20, and pretty much everything else in Nole’s favour too. Federer has lost 24 matches with match points. Djokovic has lost 3, 2 of which were prior to 2011. There’s just no debate anymore so don’t force it

@dewman7477

4 ай бұрын

@@mikemoggerson6651Djokovic won 4 slams before Federer turned 30 while Djokovic entered his peak. You can’t say one side of the story that Djokovic was too young before age 22 in 2000s decade

@idrisahmed2659

12 күн бұрын

​@@mikemoggerson6651is there a debate about who was the fan favourite when they played on the big stage or who had to always deliver on those expectations... And this clearly had an effect on the mental strength of a player or u want to overlook that ??

2010 us open he didnt do anything wrong to lose those points, novak just took the points clean, and the server (novak) still has the upper hand even at 40-15 you see that all the time. 2011 however, roger on serve. SMH. you hate to see it.

"Roger, one more Ruuner up in W please :)" ☝

I wonder if these missed opportunities keep Federer awake at night. Will he look back at his career and consider these moments or those moments of triumph

@Horkruksable

Жыл бұрын

Federer looks for Djokovic under his bed.

@robertservant1936

Жыл бұрын

I am guessing with his 1 billion dollars in net worth - the losses don't bother him too badly. He loved to compete - with competition comes both winning and losing. If Djokovic plays 3 or 4 more years he will experience a lot more defeats.

@idrisahmed2659

13 күн бұрын

Go watch his speech at Dartmouth College ull know if he regrets or doesn't

acutal meaning of the finger lady: "Roger, one more defeat by Novak" :)

I’m a fed fan and this is pitiful

@Dman9fp

2 жыл бұрын

On the bright side he's won 22 matches saving match points against him

@projectx5154

Жыл бұрын

No, it's beautiful

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

@@projectx5154since you’re a Federer hater

Novak Djokovic is the most clutch player in recent history.

Finally! Thanks for this.

This Is the exact reason he cant be the goat imo, the clutch factor its what the greatest Champions had over the rest, i you thinks about any legend of any sport you would remember some legendary moment when they prevail against the odds like It was mágic

@neb6208

2 жыл бұрын

Which is what djokovic and nadal have done many times. Although Federer does have a moment like this in 2017 AO, I guess

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

So you ignore the other accomplishments Federer has including 23 times he came back from match point down too? Such biased thinking

Can anyone tell me if Federer statistacally lost alot of matches after having matchpoints? I would like to know if Nadal or Djokovic also loose that many matches after having match points.

@chrisdonish

Жыл бұрын

Federer has lost 24 matches while holding match point, nadal has lost 9 and djokovic only 3.

@dietasse24

Жыл бұрын

@@chrisdonish Where did you get that information from? If thats true, its a pretty intersting stat

Incredible how the most talented player of all time is at the same time so mentally weak. Federer with Djokovic's mental strength wiuld go undefeated for YEARS.

Mentalmente es el más débil del big tree, un jugador que gano la mayoría de sus GS antes de la explosión de Nadal y Nole, para mi es el 3er mejor jugador de la historia 2do Rafa y #1 Nole

Just a delight to see

Love how Fedal and Nole are political parties now

Nole 🐐❤️

I don't think Roger is a weak player you can't win them all.

@k.k8291

Жыл бұрын

He's by far the best tennis player, but he's mentally weak.

@SebastianKopacz

Жыл бұрын

@@k.k8291 I dunno, look at all the matches or sets (when he still lost the match) he's won being a MP down. He was up and down, but considering his monstrous results and him standing strong against the best ever players like Nadal and Djokovic, having favorable h2h against giants of tennis like Murray, DelPo, Nishikori, Wawrinka, I'd easily place him as top15 mentally toughest players. To do what he's done with an inferior backhand and often wobbly concentration/mental toughness is a testament to his talent and, to some extent, luck too. That's why Wimbledon 2019 hurts so much, coz he was really on that day, playing concentrated and everything, yet failed at the very fucking end of the finish line. I envy Djokovic fans for this one.

@idrisahmed2659

12 күн бұрын

​@@SebastianKopaczu should also envy Novak never being the crowd favorite he never has to bother about meeting the expectations of the large crowd around him .... I like that people wildly shout and scream for Roger to win when he is on match point but I also feel jealous that the other player aka Novak doesn't have to shoulder this burden maybe if the crowd just stayed silent or were against Roger he would definitely claim those match points ..... It's the difference between when u have everything to win and people are all expecting u to do so vs u have nothing to lose and u don't have to meet anybody's expectations or atleast the expectations of the majority

FEDERER´S TRADEMARK. Please add LAVER´S CUP 2022 doubles match, CLOSED WITH A FLOURISH. Happened to him neary every year.

Roger is not mentally weak as some so called experts saying. He lost the matches when he had MPs because of his aggressive game style. He wants to finish those match points by hitting on lines and failed. He was not completely undone by Opponent in the biggest matches. Novak may be mentally weak because when he has the opportunity to create something very big, he chokes in that match completely just like US open 2021 and Olympics 2021. Wimbledon 2013 (Occassion got bigger on him while playing home favourite), French Open 2011,2012, 2015, 2020 ( He was destined to win those yet he completely lost in the match. US open 2012, 2016, 2020, 2021 Aus open 2014. Olympics 2008, 2012, 2016, 2021.

@marekwichniarek268

2 жыл бұрын

You can console yourself as much as you need. The fact is Wawrinka was hitting lines when winning his slams, also Roger did the same when winning his slams. So no excuses - choke, choke, choke.. E. g. 108 mph 1st serve, very safe, not even close to the line. At 5:3 40:15 in USO 2011 semis. That's why Novak could have smashed it so heavily. Choke, choke, choke..

@projectx5154

Жыл бұрын

😭👶🤓🤡😂

@roljavi

Жыл бұрын

LOL, his "aggressive style". He was playing like amateur, refusing to play backhand and there is fucking video evidence in front your Fedtard eyes.

@dewman7477

Жыл бұрын

@@roljavidjokotard and dulltard are just as worse

I like you uploaded a different video about fed

5:20 and 40-15 trilogy CHOKERER movie scenario blockbuster beginning 🤣🤣🤣🤣.... people must by ticket popcorn and enjoy the show 🤣🤣🤣🤣🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

He has said himself that he starts zoning out and thinking about the locker room when he is approaching victory

@DjokerFan

6 ай бұрын

Then he is definitely a narcissist

@idrisahmed2659

12 күн бұрын

Yea it can be a very harmful thought to have at that very moment

So many times he fucked up that’s it’s annoying

There are only 3 matches where he should have won match points. In the other case his opponent was serving or it was a tie-break. The 3 he should have won are: - US Open 2011 - Indian Wells 2018 - Wimbledon 2019 2 of them against Djokovic who is mentally really strong. I play tennis so I know that sometimes it may happen losing with match point.

@martinlindhardt8410

Жыл бұрын

I do not play tennis but I also know that sometimes it may happen losing with match point