The commercial at the end of this videos is absolutely beautiful and most of all true.

"You can't hurt me Kismet, you're just a robot!" "Do you really think so? Do you really think so? Do you really think so?"

Happy video.

thanks ! Rodney Brooks

awesome

Wow, great.

That one woman's about to make that robot cry!

And this was in 2003...

it's not so much about programming for self awareness, not even we can tell if another human being is truly self aware. it's about creating the illusion, to the point where no one can tell the difference. and that is very possible.

Not familiar with the theory myself but I agree. Not only will robots be able to design and build other robots but I also believe that their evolutionary rate would be exponential compared to us "carbons". It'll be the Second Renaissance from Animatrix, I tell ya.

Actually here at the University of Reading in UK, the engineering department connected a mouse brain to a silicon chip, put it in a box with 4 wheels, and guess what.. it moves and avoids hitting the walls. So, imagine how close we are connecting a human brain.Now that's scary

Wow.

Hi George. There's also a guy in the US that is very seriously trying to produce brain prosthesis. His name is Theodore W. Berger, at BMSR. I know that there are also scientific publications showing blind people seeing very simple things via cameras and a 'brain chip'. But the connection to the brain doesn't persist well.

"Don't worry, it's a robot, it's smart." Woah. Just woah.

just to let you know we see in 3d (X,Y,Z) not 2d (X,Y). that is why we can judge distance

he dusnt mention the orphius theory! simple robots that can design more complicated robots ect then envntualy maby one we dont want?? only a thought... great job ted! keep it up...

I agree with silverblue73. I think that making humanlike robots that could concivably pass turing's test is possible, would be awesome, and also not practical: the point of having AI in the first place is to make it work on problems unsolvable to humans, using non-human form of computing data, not to replicate human thinking since we have already abundance of it. I would like to have mine C3PO too, but i prefer AI tutor, AI-robofactory or a surgery bot that can save my life.

Dude, you do realise this was actually filmed in early 2003?

It's really amusing to see some of the most brilliant people in the world interact with a roomba before it was a thing that people knew about.

What you state here is very true. its evolution of man. Its very tough, cruel and small minded. But as evolution moves on and we get new and better experiences our consciousness evolves to. We have better awareness. Evolution is about groups and the change they harvest over time but in the future as we have more information available to us and for free we become smarter, more aware of our environment and maybe even rid the ego. This type of evolution can only be brought on by technology.

@8legsFreak impossible why?

It's not expressiing "its" emotion. It is running through a program that has been pre-decided by humans. If supercomputers with countless terabytes and trillions of instructions per second do not have true consciousness, I doubt poor Kismet will ever have it. :(

That's simply because there is no clear definition of the soul. If there ever is one, then it can be replicated artificially.

May the future be Open sourced entirely.

"The robot rights movement". Yea, I can see that happening.

Why would the audience laugh at 05:00 when the soldier throws the surveillance robot through the window? To me this is no laughing matter: I'm sure this technology will soon be used on a larger scale both for good and evil. They might stop laughing as soon as it comes into their homes...

There's nano technology and quantum machines. If those are reliably developed, Moore's Law could continue.

To keep robots from ever taking over, just make sure they run on Windows.

Fuck this! im becoming best friends with john conner and puttin every austrian on steroids so dont worry we are saved lol

I love AI. I don't care if AI be more intellegent than human, thats the goal. I want robot with emotion next.

Aslong as there are computerfreaks who take pleasure in developing viruses for other peoples computers, is it really a good idea to build robots? And another aspect, we already have a show on TV called RobotWars, - hows that gonna be in the future if we build thinking robots? And how is that gonna be running together with the "pay respect to robots as living creatures". And i fear there will be critical major unemployment when a cheap robot can do the job of a human.

Santha thinks that I'm special and so does the Easter Bunny + Jesus.

I'm not to worried about the Terminator. I'm more concerned about cybernetically enhanced humans. We're much closer to that.

Not quite close. It will be a slow progression and a slow upgrade. Our culture is afraid of robots because of hollywood. Look at the japanese culture and how they empower robots. Also, children love them and think they can touch and love these machines because of films like toy story, nemo etc. It will not be super bad. We only have to fear what our fears are and that is a machine enslaving us but thats just neurotic. We have no clue what will happen with these robots

we know, mozzi9, lol.. we know

How are they going to solve the problem, which is basically that mechanical parts aren't getting any cheaper? Mechanical parts will have to get much cheaper before useful robots become common, regardless of the AI-aspect. The global economy is just not good enough to make robots affordable to all but the wealthiest.

thinking is a strictly human way of computing data. Only way to make a "thinking machine" is to copy/scan/upload human brain-mind circle. But that would hardly be a AI, just a morphologicaly different human.

Example. If we cna change our DNA and brain cells with nano bots to make us more efficient humans, stronger and more compassionate towards eachother then why not? Yes we still have human nature and we have many questions to raise when and if we should megre with this technology. Now we do not know enough about human nature so there is a possibility that it could be changed with this technology. We could make certain routine jobs obsolete over night with this. Humans will have more time to explor

Dont worry robots will evolve but so will we. We will find more ways of staying on top, think of genetic engineering and nanotechnology. One day (not too long from now) we could access all of human knowledge instantly and wirelessly by only thinking, like the movie "matrix" but without a big ugly USB port in the back of our heads. the future will be awesome for man and mech alike...

For him to say that no-one will build a bad robot is seriously undermining the idiocy that some members of the human race have. I know of a couple of people that might build a rouge sky net like intelligence given the chance, but to target a certain group of humans, be it a different race, nationality or even just a view point. I think we should limit how much intelligence we give machines. Prevention is better than a cure.

what i meant was that making an AI so similar to human so it could pass turing's test is useless, even if that artificial mind was superior to ours, what would make much more sense is an alternative un-human intelligence that could think outside anthropologic cartesian box.

I Robot (Isaac Asimov) One of his female characters falls in love with her robot, Tony. And, oh yes, he is the ultimate "battery operated boy." How soon are sex-robots going to appear?

Robots taking over production would essentially be robot "slaves", no? Robots taking over government would be robots controlling humans. It's a reversal of the slave/owner control mechanisms. Would it not mean that WE become the slaves?

I rather hope that I do not live long enough to see robots that can be.. spoken to, and communicated with... become commonplace.

This type of evolution is not darwinian evolution. This type of evolution is individual evolution is the very core to our existense. Call it what you want. SPirtual evolution, integral consciousness etc. But if this does come to pass it will help humanity way more than now. And in the end again it is up to us not the machines if were going to destroy our selves. We can create bad science like Industrial sector's and bombs or we can create good science designing a world where everyone has a chanc

*shrugs* I never see strong AI in my life. So I wouldn't be quick to say robots can understand anything by our standards. If they will be able in some degree, then not in this century. But creativity, or writing their own programs, I think that's way over their hea... i mean chips.

dude wth. they gotta stop making weird experiments to mice.

Machines built to be better than us, must therefore be better than us in every measurable and qualitative way. That is going to take some serious science and engineering. And, its worth doing. We can become the machines we prefer to become!

Ok email me then. We'll talk about it. I still don't quite understand where your coming from? I assume you know about ADDTV. They are trying to raise awareness of end of normal humans. I enjoy their video's. But humans will merge with machines slowly. We will up grade and become introduced to it. Kind of like now how people wear glasses, have inplants instead of bones etc. I have a titanium rod inside my chest that replaced my sternum bone inside my chest. This will be the same with Nano bots.

He's actually quite naive. The machines in sci-fi took over either because of a mistake in programming (a bug), a sob who put a virus in it, or robots gainging self-awereness and feeling threatened by us. He didn't address those issues.

It's the first thing that'll be done. A robot you can screw.

My friend, if the history of science has taught us anything, it's that "impossible" or "laughable" in one generation becomes "normal" in the next. Try telling someone from the 18th century about the internet, or airplanes, or heart transplants. You'll be laughed out of the room. So, please reconsider.

lol

they - can't - learn at least not from what i've seen. from my perspective idea they will create (ie program) is laughable.

Dur... first, dur...

Butlerian Jihad anyone?

Yes, give me robot slaves... I WANT MY SLAVES!

robots are better than humans in every way.

Robotics is dead field....people are saying this since mid late 1990s. There is hardly any progress in artificial intelligence.

@vasantpns

5 жыл бұрын

hahaha look whos laughing now

@KivySchool

5 жыл бұрын

Say it again