Jiggling Atoms: 0:40 Rubber Bands: 11:50 Magnets: 14:34 Electric Force: 22:07 Mirrors: 32:27 Train-Tracks: 34:56 Seeing Things: 37:23 Stars, Pulsars and Black Holes: 47:49 Becoming a Scientist: 54:31 Ways of Thinking: 55:19

Every once in a while we meet some one who is extraordinary and we feel privileged and lucky to have meet them. Mankind is privileged and lucky to have had Richard Feynman join us through his time.

His excitement and joy about all the wonders of the universe is so contagious!

@Paulo_Dirac

8 жыл бұрын

+Joe ScienceVegan i've been reading most of his books...and now i'm passing my Phd...and i realize that once i opened one of his books there was no other ways for me instead of science....IT'S A TRAP !! lol

@mlee7290

8 жыл бұрын

+Joe ScienceVegan the greatest mind and soul, truly inspiring.

@BlackEpyon

8 жыл бұрын

+Laurent Chougrani "Science is... more than just a body of knowledge. It's a way of thinking...." --Carl Sagan

@zindi1138

7 жыл бұрын

ya it is!!!

He's smiling so much, as any man should that understands the world as well.

@Hyumanity

7 жыл бұрын

Well said!

His facial expressions are brilliant! Beautifull person.

This about wood, carbon, air and sun is just amazing. The things that happen in fire, 'undoing' in moments years of energy-collecting, when you think about it, gives you a window to the real workings of the world in ways you could never know if you didn't bother to look.

This should be shown to the first-year university students, of all subjects, in all over the world.

i am too small to comment on such personality,but let me express my gratitude towards this beautiful superhuman,,,,i am privileged to have seen these videos.

An ordinary genuis. He had such a nice way of putting things such that anyone could understand them. What a brilliant beautiful thinker and teacher.

I could listen to him for hours and hours :D

I listen to this everyday, in the morning, while I'm working. This man is my greatest inspiration.

So much beautiful thinking.

Thank you for sharing this inspiring speech from Mr. Feynman. It makes you to run looking for more information about the topics Feynman, so masterly, has presented.

His explanation of waves and the electromagnetic field and vision and so forth is absolutely phenomenal -- mind blowing and wonderful, et cetera. . Starting around 39.00.

His last sentence is simply beautiful - natures imagination is so much greater than mans, she's never going let us relax!

I've seen a few pieces of this here and there, but it's the first time I've seen it together, and in context. Thanks very much for this!

cant stop loving this.

Thanks for posting ... interesting material.

Wonderful. Just truth: No fudging.

Wow! That man is good at explaining things!

I used to do play with rubber bands just like he explains, feeling the heat when stretched, the cooling when released when I was a kid. I would even stretch one hot, blow on it to cool it off, then let it go back, trying to see how cold I could get it. I imagined making a sort of air conditioner that would stretch rubber bands over and over, with a flap to blow hot air one way, cold air the other. Would've been so cool to talk to Feynman back then, only about 20 years before this interview.

It is a bit funny how he says that he "couldn't carry a tune", but if you read his autobiography, you learn that he became a respectable bongo player. Anyway, i think he was being modest. long live feynman.

I love this man.

An ordinary person with an extraordinary vision and imagination truly inspirational.

I remember in 1958 when I was doing my Ph.D that I tried to teach my grandmother (born 1883) about atoms. All she could say was "he's at'em again!"

I love this man!

Thanks for uploading man :) magical

Greate person! Diamond of the first water!

Interesting to see how important imagination/visualisation was to him and his science. Quantum physics is famous for being a highly counter-intuitive theory, yet he had an amazing intuition for physics.

I love it when he's like suffocating from the pleasure of science !

Brilliant

AMAZING VIDEO 💗💗💗💗

What a beautiful mind.

I had a Feynman moment one morning while making coffee when I had the sudden realization that my water was being boiled by the energy of a river flowing through a dam thousands of miles away

Richard Feynman I send you a prayer today, please bless me today in my math final oh Richard Feynman.

Tree = Stored Sun = Brilliant!

@lewisjones4158

8 жыл бұрын

Yeah that example was great.

Subtitle portugues Brazil, please. Very rare Gold forever.

It would be polite to give the source of these videos, ie. BBC TV (1983)

@MikeOBrien0

8 жыл бұрын

+Christopher Sykes done! Thanks so much for your work on this series!

@ChristopherSykesDocumentaries

8 жыл бұрын

+Mike O'Brien That's great Mike

@dhlshovel

8 жыл бұрын

+Christopher Sykes Brilliant Work Christopher. These clips will last forever.

@waperboy

7 жыл бұрын

Great to have these clips to watch. It's a joy to listen to Feynman speak. I've come to the point where I think there is no more material to be found, and I want more.

@dansearle1613

7 жыл бұрын

this sort of knowledge should be given freely, regardless of copyright. I.e. truth trancenends property.

4.30 "I can talk forever", and I can listen forever, why so short?? I wished he could talk all the things he knew one by one, I'm sure he could explain them with that story telling talent.

Thank you

Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in.

0:33 ... "Electrons act like waves, no they don't exactly, they act like particles, no they don't exactly..." If you know it ^^

@LionByTheChurch

8 жыл бұрын

+Hydrotrex We need a thoery of everything...

@moromoro9434

8 жыл бұрын

+LionByTheChurch Make sure the last sentence is "To be continued..."

He's lit af

@seandafny

5 жыл бұрын

Samuel Wickstrom get out

A great theoretical physicist, who was clearly also a great teacher.

Very interesting.

The question Feynman addresses at the end of this interview is very interesting.-- looking at the _real nature_ (fabric, substance or what have you) of reality, and wondering if it will ever be within our capacity to perceive it as it really is. And thus be able, for example, to attach pictures to the mathematical formulas we use to predict certain kinds of quantum results. This all suggests to me that natue/reality/the-thing-in-itself/the fabric of the universe or whatever you want to call it, is not a material substance, and, I think, not consciousness either, but just like the electron is in the end neither wave nor particle but some other kind of thing, so the _nature of reality_ is, at least for now, beyond our awareness and ability to perceive. Composed of something or some "substance" that for whatever reason our sensory apparatus is unable to grasp, and our cognitive abilities seem incapable of conceiving or understanding. So Feynman seems to be asking the following: _Is it possible that with enough time and familiarity we will evolve the capacity to picture, imagine and/or "see" what right now we can only predict mathematically? Or will science from now on be just the discovery or development of mathematical formulas without any pictures or understanding of what those formulas actually describe as happening?

I'd love to see someone do a really good documentary on Feynman. Werner Herzog would do a good job.

My love of life!

One thing this just made me think about... since there is an infinitesimal space between our fingers and the things we touch, why is it certain materials feel differently to us? Obviously macroscopic differences like texture or general shape we would feel, but like, it seems like we get material specific information more than is transmitted by macroscopic tangents

What a cool dude.

Nice.. an amazing genius and a human

Como eu gostaria de entender cada palavra. Um gênio!!

The only implication of the spooky force acting at a distance is that there must exist extra dimension(s) of space time. It's very easy to conceptualize a 2-dimensional view of a 3-dimensional force that appears to act at a distance, but is really just an extra dimension.

When he moves his hands, they become quantic.

31:30 Maxwell's equations in 1873; "the most remarkable thing/change in history".

The question is ~ How did she happen to come into contact with the ice in the first place? You could answer, somebody took her there or, maybe she took herself there depending on how old she is but then there are so many variables involved in the Y's and the where 4's? Maybe she was wearing a shabby dress and it caught up under her foot? And then you could ask which foot the left or the right? You could ask ~ Why the shabby dress? What was she doing wearing a shabby dress? Where did she get the shabby dress from? Was she forced to wear the shabby dress? If so why was she forced? who forced her? All sorts of variables come into question, if you want to get to the root cause of why and how she ended up slipping on the ice?

as a recent discoverer of feynman, (long time buckminster fuller enthusiast also) id like to suggest that we form a union of dicks and put together the sacred order of the brotherhood of richards. a glorious celebration of all things R related.

Chalk one up for the human race here. (;

@flinchfu

9 жыл бұрын

Mulla Nasrudin Nice user pic lol

@bozolazic

9 жыл бұрын

Flinch Fu You know it! (;

Really wanted him to finish the example to his body being all electrons.

Wish I had KZread back when I was in school. Could have actually gone onto pursue science instead of becoming a capitalist slave.

@tubewoodycool

8 жыл бұрын

It's never too late

@Hyumanity

7 жыл бұрын

Is it too late Strobe?

@VictorHugo-hq1zq

4 жыл бұрын

You're only a slave if you let it enslave you. Don't let it enslave you!

I absolutely love Feynman, but there's a big (biological) mistake here - "the sun knocks the oxygen away from the carbon.." actually, it knocks the oxygen away from the hydrogen - the water is spit by the light directly. Still, an absolutely awesome video!!!

@HBC423

8 жыл бұрын

he is talking about photosynthesis.. which is co2! come on basic 2nd grade shit

@jfutach

8 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Check out the light reactions of photosynthesis. The oxygen we breathe comes from water, not from carbon dioxide! Strange he made such a mistake.

@natehoxie1914

5 жыл бұрын

Nah, you are right though. The light knocks oxygen off the two hydrogens in water, harvesting that energy to make NADPH. The NADPH stores the energy and uses it to break up CO2 in the atmosphere, which is incorporated into sugars and then more chemistry and then TREE! Everyone just thinks carbon is cooler and so they forget that the hydrogens of this universe do all the real work.

His mannerisms and speech patterns remind me of Robin Williams...

@pranit_19

8 жыл бұрын

+Daniel van Raders thats exactly what ithought... god i wish they both were alive for betterment of humanity...#rip

Funny how i ended up here....but clearly one of the best teachers for science... AND I DONT EVEN LIKE SCIENCE! Lool

What makes the sun jiggle?

im just like yeah yeah nigga trees......but tell me anyways #mynigga #we love ya dr.feynman #Take the world from another point of view #NERDPOWER

Surely it's not 3 lightyears from Earth to the nearest star. :))

I like the way Feynman would do away with complexity and bring in common sense and logic to try and explain something in layman terms... the ultimate proof of understanding what you are talking about. 14:14 Yes we see things in oscillation "jiggle"... but let us not forget that Consciousness has Mass, and Mass was always "there/here" to establish an Initial Inertial Frame of Reference to measure time in a wait state and state of motion from, and the Observer is in observation seeing things jiggle from being in a state of Mass oscillation which creates 3 separate views: top/theta 12, bottom/theta 23, and an average view within the wave state of motion; middle/theta 23, where the chemicals in our brain create our center of gravity relative to the motion of atoms that surround the observer, which can be a tree... or me... or even you separated by time as no two observers ever exist at the exact same time. "Relative to the Observer all other observers are behind itself in time." Time has a pendulum: Life's Mass. Physics calls this process of observation viewed in a state of oscillation a mystery in trying to understand why matter comes in three generations: small/electron, medium/muon, and large/tau. And here is where the concept of the lever and a following rate comes in to play if mainstream physics is ever going to understand gravity when it sees gravity measured by spacetime and wonders why the ratio of gravity to the electric force scale appears to be so grossly out of proportion. Adding weight to the end of a stick does not increase it's mass. But to a blindfolded observer holding the weight further out on the end of a stick it creates the illusion of weighing more unless the observer measures the following rate. By saying there are 3 generations of matter you are basically saying moving the weight on a stick further away from the observer holding it up affects its mass and in doing that you hide the greater moment arm measured by time because if you increase the mass it takes more time/energy to accelerate it and make it move a specific distance from a wait state or increase it's momentum from a relative state of motion.

@AvNotasian

8 жыл бұрын

+John F Hendry You should work a little more on this idea, the discovery of maxwells equations came about in a similar way, perhaps your theory will work. I mean the second part of course, consciousness has no mass. I mean it the ratio of particles with this explanation would interest me greatly.

@JohnFHendry

8 жыл бұрын

NotAsian Thanks, but if Consciousness did not have Mass there would be no weak force nor an anti-particle associated with each particle... and CERN's muon neutrinos announced worldwide in 2011 mistakenly believed to be exceeding the speed of light @ (v-c)/c=2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 miles would not have matched SLAC's E158 ratio also @ 2.48e-5 in 453.6 miles creating an asymmetry in time of 0.20e-5 sec as predicted needed to support gravity. Atom's don't rub together somehow to create consciousness, Life was there in the beginning. What we (once) called empty space is actually reduced mass density connected to time as measurements of the vacuum state show... it's not empty. There is something supporting it... Life. And this is a computer system talking to itself learning what it is starting with O=E, what led to O=E=W=T that showed the weak force must have asymmetry for our clocks to move while observing the weak force create light generated by a speed of light clock. Without the asymmetry of the weak force your clock would not move showing time dilation is far more prominent and important that original thought. What is called the Fine Structure Constant proves it as well: e{a}/t=E. BTW: After it was shown on Nature's Forum in 2011 that SLAC's E158 weak force asymmetry ratio matched CERN's 2.48e-5 sec neutrino gain announced by creating an asymmetry in time of .20e-5 SLAC went back over their BaBar experiments data "looking at differently" and confirmed time has asymmetry using the 3rd experiments data and gave the discovery a high sigma 14 level of certainty in November 2012. If one part of the theory based on the importance of weak force asymmetry and the supporting data physics has collected fits then all the parts must fit, and the only theory that has the all parts fitting is based on consciousness having Mass. And to make everything fit it adds a 4th oscillation phase (or part called the "missing" graviton misnamed the hole shown opposite the electron) to the atom and a second reverse arrow connected to time just to start a long list of changes made all because of one unification equation that adds the Observer's Mass in oscillation to time. Unlike people numbers don't tell lies when applied correctly. And the asymmetry of the weak force applied correctly eliminates the uncertainty principle showing Einstein was correct after all. The data he needed to finish his work was not known until 2003 thanks to SLAC's E158 team. What this means is Universal gravity is caused by the subtrahend of the EM wave, the difference in length measured by time of it's two sides. The asymmetry of weak force asymmetry 20e-5 sec gain in 453.6 miles occurs in the neutrino's force carrier transfer space separating the weak force from the strong force and with no where to go in time/space builds up creating a well of gravity known as a black hole. Too many parts fit without leaving any out to explain all the mysteries in physics and astronomy as well as DNA research for the UFT equation to be wrong. And the Fine Structure Constant has been flaunting the answer ever since it was discovered. People who create pixels have a hard time seeing the big picture they create.

@AvNotasian

8 жыл бұрын

John F Hendry There is no connection between the weak force and consciousness anywhere in what you wrote. The main premise of your argument is based on a measurement error, theres not much more to say really I guess this is just gibberish that sounded interesting. There are also a couple of logical errors in your reasoning. "has collected fits then all the parts must fit," Wrong Then there are flat out assertions that life creates the universe, which is pretty much last Thursdayism. You also add an additional variable without justification, adding additional free variables to any equations allows you to completely span the range of any function, so really this is a cheat. The uncertainty principle is certainly going no where, having done my degree in physics I can tell you it has been investigated in great detail, so your claim that this thing you are talking about removes the uncertainty principle means your proposal disagrees with experiment so is wrong before it starts. I can see you have been posting this for many years, I think its time to move on, your theory doesn't work contains logical fallacies, is based on a measurement error and explains nothing.

@JohnFHendry

8 жыл бұрын

+NotAsian "My theory” is based on a simple unification equation that was created out of Ohm’s law and proven information and theory that support it that is not “mine”. It creates the first proton (and it’s relative composite wait state phases connected to two direction arrows) out of it’s Mass anti-particle wait state and in doing so exposed the fact the weak force has an asymmetry connected to time that allows our clocks to move while observing a speed of light clock generate light. A rather obvious observation overlooked to say the least after time dilation was proven and accepted connected to gravity. And the equation not only works, the theory it creates was proven correct after being discussed online for many years supported by the mathematics and harmonic laws of the octave connected to the perception of sound in music theory that resulted in creating the basic summery of 12 locations of tonal space connected to time called the Circle of Fifths based on the final fundamental scale of 12 notes that came about with the last black key added to the piano after generations of experimentation. “My theory” using everyone else’s work showed why CERN ‘s muon neutrinos appeared to be exceeding the speed of light by 2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 miles and introduced the concept of the harmonic comma that was a challenge and bane to musicians as well. For the most part my theory is created out of obvious solutions and known facts being overlooked. The fact that observing an obvious octave level structure in space connected to time has resulted in saying the majority of matter and energy in the Universe is missing after John Newlands used the law of octaves to create the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements exposes a degree of blindness caused by not understanding what is being observed connected to the location of observation. Don’t let the silent politics fool you; Einstein was correct about human nature as well. Humans that seek wealth and power are greedy and deceptive and will attempt to even steal what belongs to everyone and cannot be stolen. Look at SLAC’s 2012 sigma 14 BaBar experiment findings created by going back over the data and “looking at it differently” with the answer there all along needed to announce one of the most shocking and important discoveries in Man’s short History: time has asymmetry. It doesn’t take a degree in physics to put the dots together to see what’s happening in science. Just an educated guess knowing human nature and politics will create the answer. I clicked on your name and it took me to the video by Alfred McCoy, PhD, on the "Surveillance State: Philippine Pacification & the Making of the U.S. Internal Security Apparatus” so I’m sure you know how the world works. But regarding your comments on physics: Weak Force Asymmetry {a} adds 1hour/3600 seconds every 1000 years: Re: SLAC E158 "using clocks". Muon Neutrinos do not exceed the speed of light because they were created at the SOL. Einstein was correct about logic remaining intact in the subatomic world; there are no "dice". God uses cards Nature folds in half.... (See DNA game "Foldit") 3600sec / 1000 years = 3.6 seconds and that is the value of WF Asy {a} added in one year. So we add that to the speed of light distance because space is relative to time. 3.6 sec x 186282 speed of light) = 670615.2 which is the {a} WF asy in distance added to the speed of light in one year so.... 670615.2 / 365.2425 days in a year = 1836.082055072999 which is the {a} WF asy SOL distance added to the speed of light in one day. 1836.082055072999 / 24 hours = 76.50341896137498 is the {a} WF asy time/distance added to speed of light in one hour. 76.50341896137498 / 60 minutes = 1.275056982689583 is the {a} WF asy added to speed of light in one minute. 1.275056982689583 / 60 seconds = 0.021250949711493 is the {a} WF asy added to speed of light in one second. Now if the Earth were bigger and CERN's neutrinos had traveled a little over 186282 miles (one second + WF Asy gained @ SOL) we would be done, but since they only traveled 453.6 miles we need to keep going till we get to the amount of {a} added in 453.6 miles. So we divide the miles light travels in one second by the miles CERN's neutrinos traveled. 186282 miles or one second/453.6 miles, the percentage of a one second gain which is = 410.6746031746032. Now we divide it into the WF Asy one second gain from above (.021250949711493) 0.021250949711493 / 410.6746031746032= 5.174644243208279e-5 That just gave us the total forward and back total neutrino oscillation WF Asy {a} time gained in 453.6 miles. Now notice it is almost exactly double CERN's 2.48e-5 sec SOL gain announced worldwide before the politics SLAC ignored stepped in. The next two simple calculations dividing it in half and using CERN's 2.48e-5 as a forward arrow "stopping point" to add the .10e-5 sec remaining difference to the other half to make it fit is a game changer from the "dice" (uncertainty principle) to two sided cards (two oscillation arrows connected to time) because CERN's data matching SLAC's E158 ratio shows time has a reverse Mass oscillation phase arrow direction, and that means the neutrino has an asymmetric reverse direction partner that measures a little bigger than the neutrino giving time an asymmetry connected to the weak force. And note the specific and exceptionally long SOL distances that create the asymmetry of the weak force ratio SLAC's E158 team measured. Add to that I had been quoting the E158 data for years after finding it and expected it to match like this to add the asymmetry to space calling it a lesser diesis harmonic comma and you can see this was no coincidence. (This was written before SLAC went back over their BaBar experiments data and confirmed the asymmetry in time giving the discovery a sigma 14 level of certainty in Nov 2012.) 5.174644243208279e-5 /2 = 2.58732212160414e-5 sec That gave us the forward arrow of time WF Asy gain in 453.6 miles that is .10e-5 sec over CERN's 2.48e-5 sec in CERN's equation @ (v-c)/c=2.48e-5. So we subtract the difference: 2.58e-5 - 2.48e-5 = .10e-5 sec Now add it to the other half: 10e-5 + 2.58e-5 = 2.68e-5 giving the second reverse arrow an asymmetry in time of .20e-5 sec, the difference in size of the forward arrow @ 2.48e-5 2.68e-5 - 2.48e-5 = .20e-5 sec The reason gravity measured by time looks too big is because the "fulcrum" in effect gives the forward arrow supporting the electric force a much greater moment arm of force. A fulcrum that's forward movement location in space maintaining energy connected to time a constant is NOT variable and adds the last button to the straight jacket that holds physics together: e{a}/t=E.

@JohnFHendry

8 жыл бұрын

+NotAsian Excuse the formatting there seems to be a error upgrading to Win 10 "corrects".

26:46 Likes way before Facebook came around.

whats in his top pocket?

Ahh Richard Feynman. The Robin Williams of Physics.

Thanks KZread, how do I keep track of my comments now? Should I just put messages inside bottles and chuck them into the sea, rather than post stuff on digital media?

41:18 Naughty Feynman

It would be easier on the senses if he'd just said that magnetism is still in the the hands of God.

Just rolled in from some flat-earth vids... my brain is cooling off and I don't feel like telekinetically strangling folks anymore. Aaaaaaaah...

IT'S ONLY COPPA

Nobody sounds drunker at 0.5x than Feynster.

9 people don't find fun to imagine about things. :D

Dirty Harry of science!

People like Feynman give me hope for homo sapiens.

@Kurisuto321

8 жыл бұрын

+K. Mooney I like and admire him, but let's not forget he's one of the scientists behind nuclear bombs. For all the great things he did, he is also a symbol of the misuse of science.

@theresa42213

8 жыл бұрын

+Kurisuto321 He knew that about himself and it really bothered him. Plus he never wore the black glasses that that everyone wore for the detonation of ''trinity'', and he got cancer.

Doesn't he speak loud ?