That cameraman was putting in work.

@duncanrussell3211

9 жыл бұрын

DylanGamesEvelyn Omg literally scrolled down to say that and this was the first comment 👏

@duncanrussell3211

9 жыл бұрын

lavertable That's the emoji for applause...

@ophiolatreia93

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly my comment

@barbaraseymour3437

5 ай бұрын

Making me seasick.

2:48 . Did she call him ' closed minded with a straight face? Oh hell

@Sartjediebee

4 жыл бұрын

She did! How offensive. Especially because how closed her mind is.

@SpatialAndTemporalEvangelicals

3 жыл бұрын

His Mind IS Closed To GOD.

@localman9063

3 жыл бұрын

@@SpatialAndTemporalEvangelicals You know nothing.

@iwillbeginagain

2 жыл бұрын

No she said it with a creepy ass smile

@piertinence

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sartjediebee Dawkins is very close minded as well. He really believes in the myth of natural selection. His pretension that beautiful creatures could only be designoid object only presenting an appearance of being intelligently design. Dawkins coined the word designoid over 10 years ago, but no dictionary have yet found a definition for the clearly idiotic concept.

Good grief... it's like trying to have a conversation with an audio recording. Well done, Richard Dawkins, for putting up with her.

@robertrosenberg8745

10 жыл бұрын

I agree with Richard Dawkins views but I think we could have done better job. debating Wendy Wright. She does score some points by pointing out some errors in discoveries scientist had accepted. Further she prods Dawkins to provide evolution evidence which I don't feel a man of his excellent caliber does a good job providing in this beginning clip.

@19perception83

10 жыл бұрын

As I say "The religious tape recorder is on play. It occasionally pauses, you might even get a rewind but ultimately it will always end up on play".

@jackclingenpeel5020

5 жыл бұрын

Paul Martin I suspect she had something to do with his stroke.

@joeymarshall2026

2 жыл бұрын

@@robertrosenberg8745 Do you want him to bring the evidence with him ?

@piertinence

2 жыл бұрын

It is wise of the Darwinian priest to argue religious people with poor debating skill. Dawkins sermon on the billion of year evolutionary journey of a bacteria into an atheist brain is not even poor science fiction.

All the lights are on but there's no-one at home.

@Philrc

10 жыл бұрын

yep, the wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead.

@Charlie94781

3 жыл бұрын

@@Philrc the hamster actually took a long vacation

Imagine this woman speaking to children. This is damaging.

@jackclingenpeel5020

5 жыл бұрын

thangerstrings it’s called child abuse

@RahulSingh-cu3du

4 жыл бұрын

Time between begining of creation and beginign of destruction is kalpa (day of brahma) = 4.32 billion years Age of earth according to modern radiometric data is around 4.54 billion years(As you have quoted) Puranas quotes that currently we are in 7 th manvantara , 28th mahayuga of current kalpa. So age of earth = = 6 * Years for Manvantara + 28 * Years for mahayuga = 6 * 306.72mil + 28 * 4.32 mil = 1.92 billion years But I am not sure , why it would be roughly half estimated time by science. Puraans Quotes that currently we are in 7th manvantra, 28th mahayuga of current kalpa. So age of Earth = 7 * Years for Manvantra + 28 * Years for mahayuga = 7 * 306.72 million * 4.32 million = 1.969 billion years.

@greglaprade7507

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown Exactly. God created science and the laws of nature.

@greglaprade7507

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown I know. With all the archaeology alone, consistent with key Bible narratives, that's been found, the atheists prefer to live in denial. They prefer their junk science over the science of archeology. They deny how God could exist or perform supernatural acts. They deny forensic science evidence of the crucifixion and resurrection. I guess they figure if a majority concensus denies it all, heaven and hell and objective truth will not be so.

@epiphany501

3 жыл бұрын

Omg, no.

This is so painful just to watch, I can't fathom how Richard got through it. Engaging Wendy Wright in rational debate is like engaging a pigeon in Chess: In the end she'll knock over the pieces, shit on the board and call it victory. :)

@EGOS42

8 жыл бұрын

+Gary D (Unhacker) You win 10 internets! One of the funniest comments on KZread.

@Charlie94781

4 жыл бұрын

Pigeons are Harvard professors compared to Wendy Wright

@ZombieNationLTD

3 жыл бұрын

That. Is. Hilarious

@fodetoure1576

2 жыл бұрын

I saw this exact comment on a video of Dawkins arguing with chopra. You copied and pasted this

@robertosheldon9061

2 жыл бұрын

pigeons play like that? lol

The way she smiles makes me cringe. It's so sickeningly sweet and disingenuous.

@jordanwademeier

10 жыл бұрын

You should meet the mormons...

@Spook327

7 жыл бұрын

She grates on me like a real-life Dolores Umbridge.

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

Perhaps it's the God/Truth that she defends that makes depraved people cringe

The most patient man in history

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

The most clueless man, actually. RD believes we got all this by...."literally nothing." Wendy believes we got all this by a supernatural creator. You are a tiny brain like RD admiring his patience. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally at some point yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

The brain wash is strong in this one

@johnfalcon3614

10 жыл бұрын

This made me laugh so hard.

@jonaslorik

10 жыл бұрын

the sad part is that its not a joke, its fucking true XD

@dawnbroker5156

7 жыл бұрын

lol😁

@crispusattucks4007

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I feel bad for Dawkins. He is brainwashed worse than anyone I've ever seen

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

@@crispusattucks4007 Lol. Too bad he won't be able to take his multiple mansions with him when he dies.

I never trust people who smile while they speak...

@thunder9280

3 жыл бұрын

Then you're an idiot

@zah936

3 жыл бұрын

Me neither.

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

Why?

@nikhilaradhya4088

3 жыл бұрын

True

@cheshdagamer894

3 жыл бұрын

@@Paige-Turnner It can be a sign of manipulation, they smile to seem more friendly whilst they wrap you up. Of course it can also just mean someone's having a laugh and joke, talking about something that they're passionate about (i go crazy when i start talking about space and physics lmao) so it depends on context really.

LOL at a creationist calling someone else closed minded.

@jasonlay9492

3 жыл бұрын

Well you can't create with a closed mind.

@Bdots44

3 жыл бұрын

lol at creationists period

@homiespaghetti1522

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bdots44 how many fedoras do you own?

@Bdots44

3 жыл бұрын

@@homiespaghetti1522 how much time have you wasted praying to your invisible sky daddy?

@TheRealTact

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bdots44 bro come on 🤦🏽‍♂️ why can’t we all just respect another persons beliefs and not be toxic about this kind of subject, what do you gain from teasing a Creationist for what they believe in?

Jeez, she couldn't even pick a place to sit down

Holy shit I'm 10 seconds into this and I can already tell that it's gonna be good

The creationist is asking for evidence. Seems legit.

@TheOtherJunkMonkey

8 жыл бұрын

And he offers it and she ignores it.

@questioneverything6860

8 жыл бұрын

+Baxter Stockman "The creationist is asking for evidence. Seems legit." - of course, evidence cuts both ways. Where is the evidence supporting the account in Genesis? - There isn't any. Whereas there are mountains of evidence supporting evolution, but a lot of it is very technical. The available evidence shows that the events in Genesis never happened. Even the Bible in Genesis, contradicts itself. Yet the omniscient, omnipotent god didn't notice and couldn't even proofread his silly book, which rather undermines the claims of omniscience or omnipotence.

@HarryNicNicholas

4 жыл бұрын

and, you don't have to ask, information like that is hidden in books where believers never think of looking.

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

@@questioneverything6860 Show me one of these biblical contradictions, please.

@leehensley5019

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown

This irritating woman's inappropriate perma-smile shows that she's strangely out of tune with reality. She's trapped in happy clappy Jesus Land.

@tome6031

7 жыл бұрын

Ian Strange 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 im dead

@davewalker9899

7 жыл бұрын

Ian Strange seems like she's in a cult ffs she's a lunatic

@yashagar4443

6 жыл бұрын

Ian Strange so true l just felt like punching her in the face.

@themousethatroared3371

5 жыл бұрын

Yes! Actually, she even seemed more like an android than a human being. Her programing was complete Creepy.

@Tsuruta1

5 жыл бұрын

@@themousethatroared3371 Because she's not responding with vehement shrieks, and vitriol, that makes her "strange," "weird" "android-like" or any other derogatory label to you, eh? Wendy Wright isn't trying to convince or force Dawkins her belief onto him, rather Dawkins is, and with failed argument.

Her vacuous eyes! Scary.

Dawkins said that this was his most frustrating interview. I can see why. I'm surprised he could stay so calm and collected.

Which evidence does creationists have? Oh right, a book which is written by unreliable sources.

@MrLarossi

10 жыл бұрын

a book that had predicted several unknown phenomenons and causes which were undiscovered in science (Expansion of the universe,black holes,..) go and read the Quran!!

@Sujad

10 жыл бұрын

AbdelAziz Larroussi Why? Religion has as much real world use as the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus. It's to coddle people with limited reasoning who can't fathom the universe without it being simplified to magic from some all powerful space wizard.

@MrLarossi

10 жыл бұрын

those limited reasoning creationists (Muslims) have made so much and revolutionary scientific achievements,and do you think they're limited? do you want me to mention some of their discoveries and inventions??

@obiwankenobi9900

10 жыл бұрын

AbdelAziz Larroussi Why bother? There are plenty of people of a variety of faiths who have invented quite a few things and I'm sure you'll agree, back throughout the ages, if you didn't observe whatever local religion was in power, your chances of survival were near non-existent.

@SpangoChrikoWeirdo

10 жыл бұрын

AbdelAziz Larroussi You are joking, right?

'where is the evidence?' Its on our DNA. 'so where is the evidence?'... why even bother....

@Jacksty9

8 жыл бұрын

haha I laughed at that

@rogerc23

3 жыл бұрын

It’s like talking to a CNN MSNBC viewer.

@Davoda2

3 жыл бұрын

"we want to treat people with respect" meanwhile religion: "we killed hundreds of millions of people the stole money from the poor and ....."

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly! so frustrating! lol I literally said some people are lost to rational thought and then I got a comment on "send me the proof" I did my best to enlighten them but I am sure they will become defensive and throw some nonsense my way, oh well at least I tried, stay in your magical ignorant make belief story land I guess

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

@@wesley6442 RD and rational thought don't go together. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. ""There is no evidence for any supernatural being of any kind. So it goes against the spirit of science." --Richard Dawkins We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

Props to Dawkins for keeping his composure

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

You and RD are dolts. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. ""There is no evidence for any supernatural being of any kind. So it goes against the spirit of science." --Richard Dawkins We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

The way this woman smiles after saying anything infuriates me for some reason.

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

Probably because she has joy in the Lord. The inherent wickedness inside you that is a result of sin causes extreme hatred, feelings of violence and anger towards believers. You're not the first.

@jwhipple5567

2 жыл бұрын

I think it's an instinctive body-language reaction thing to be extremely uncomfortable around people when they do that. I'm sure there are experts out there who could explain it better, but it's very con-man-ish. It's like when you're talking to someone and they use your name in every sentence and nod their head constantly hoping you'll pick up on the sympathetic reflex. It's a giveaway that this person has had to employ subconscious manipulation as a coping mechanism... probably due to a total lack of self-esteem and confidence... or a person who knows they're being dishonest or their position is unfounded and is trying to win the day on charisma alone. Anybody with any life experience sees body language like that and immediately distrusts it.

@TonyEnglandUK

17 күн бұрын

@@Paige-Turnner Religo-babble. Pure, undiluted religio-babble. And I think you know it is.

There is NO evidence of evolution from one species to another... Dawkins: Oh really. 😂

@clarkporter1340

Жыл бұрын

D way u see dis in ur very close mindedness ..... Dawkins: hmm mm

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

RD says we got the universe by "literally nothing" and Wendy by a supernatural creator. Who is right?

@princegobi5992

11 ай бұрын

@@2fast2blockyou’re using quotes, so you must have a citation for that claim right?

@2fast2block

11 ай бұрын

@@princegobi5992 I do, but YT does not allow me to put links. If it's not too much trouble for your fingers, you can google "dawkins literally nothing." Is that asking too much?

@JohnSandercock

9 ай бұрын

r@@2fast2block RD

I think we should all take a moment to applaud the iron will of Dr.Dawkins. I confess, with a heavy heart, that I would have totally lost my shit about 15 minutes in.

@crispusattucks4007

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, if you aren't able to prove something you believe so strongly in, it must be very difficult. Perhaps you question whether it's true yourself?

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

Being the politically correct gamma male shill that he is, Dawkins knew that he couldn't go too far because she is female. He didn't get his mansions by not knowing how to play the game.

@crispusattucks4007

4 жыл бұрын

Greg LaPrade Yeah I watched the Owen clip too 😉

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

@@crispusattucks4007 lol it made me wanna watch this again

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

@@crispusattucks4007 Did you catch one titled "evolution is true"? It might be #715 on unauthorized.tv possibly as I recall. It compares how the big bang is actually conception, how the human embryo first looks like a tadpole, later resembles a primate before birth, etc. Isn't it fascinating how Satan and his wizards twist truth?

where shall we go for this interview? lets just stand here in this weird corner

@ZombieNationLTD

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao!

@athonyhiggins3117

3 жыл бұрын

She is more than a match for Richard Dawkins. Not one but of evedence. She is only asking for contrete evedence

@ZombieNationLTD

3 жыл бұрын

@@athonyhiggins3117 evidence*

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

it's a power move, taking a position of authority

"Very kind of you to do this interview." "Yes." What kind of arrogant person responds that way!??!?!!?

She's says that you can have micro evolution (Small changes) within a species. But that there can't be macro evolution (large changes) over a longer period of time. How is it possible that when you add up all the small changes that took place over time it doesn't become a large change? #CommonSense

I was so bothered that they didn't sit down, my knees were killing me for them!

creaTOR

I find it amazing the gentleman was able to maintain his composure even when she laughed in his face!!! A good shaking comes to mind........

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting..

Her tone of voice and vacuous stare alone irk me.

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

18For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 1 Corinthians 1:18

She’s too far gone, Richard might as well argue with a brick wall😂

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

He's too far gone, Wendy might as well argue with a brick wall😂

@bradleypease2492

3 жыл бұрын

@@Paige-Turnner are you saying he’s wrong?

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradleypease2492 Yes.

@Paige-Turnner

2 жыл бұрын

@Patrick Schlienger according to you.

@Paige-Turnner

2 жыл бұрын

@Patrick Schlienger exactly.

The best bit was asking where they should go for the interview and then proceeded to move about a foot to the left 🤣 it was like something from the office.

I watched it all about a year ago, but i can't help watching it again. It's just so funny! :D Also, i respect Dawkins for not punching her in the face

"Where did you study science?' The best line of the interview!

This is the very definition of resisting the temptations of violence. Remarkable Richard Dawkins.

@blancasaravia9652

2 жыл бұрын

She is a MAGA HAT TRUMPER

Started watching this when it was uploaded... just took my palm of my face.

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

I did too! xD!!

No please. No. No don't. Please stop. I. No. I can't take it

@ritchiethomas6850

3 жыл бұрын

It's pure torture

Richard Dawkins has levels of patience I can't even begin to understand

"There is no evidence of evolution from one species to another" when she said that, I can swear my eyeballs caved in!

the present is so good.. thanks again demian

"Show me the evidence"! *shows you the evidence* "Thats not evidence, why are you so hostile"?

@crispusattucks4007

4 жыл бұрын

His evidence was fish transitionary fossils. She asked for hominid transitionary evidence and he deflected.

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

@@crispusattucks4007 she knows very well of the evidence, she's just being difficult and defensive that religion is dead and outdated and science has proven it wrong, if you would rather believe in fairy tales written by people thousands of years ago I am sorry but there is just no reasoning with that kind of mentality

@crispusattucks4007

2 жыл бұрын

@@wesley6442 let me guess, you took the covid vaccine?

@goldilocks878

2 жыл бұрын

@@crispusattucks4007 Let me guess, you took the Cool Aid?

@crispusattucks4007

2 жыл бұрын

@@goldilocks878 you kool aid drinkers always project

I wish he had asked her for evidence of creation...

@Ante3118

9 жыл бұрын

I have a feeling he was told not to do so, it would have been to obvious

@mickeymouse12678

9 жыл бұрын

She would just say the Bible.

@Charlie94781

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickeymouse12678 Wendy definitely had a windows 97 BSOD in her brain activity

"Why can only scientists teach science"?

@gz9520

3 жыл бұрын

Same reason only mathematicians teach math. I wouldn’t want a chef to teach me geometry. I don’t want a fireman to teach me how to build a spacecraft.

I always come back to this video whenever I want to slam my head into a concrete wall out of pure frustration. Makes my writers block seem less anxiety inducing.

"And your sheer closed mindedness..." "MM-HMM!" Particularly tickled me

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

very arrogant and rude >:(

Dear God, One of your children is misbehaving. Please smite her. With thanks, The people of earth.

They both show how difficult it is to get believers and non-believers to agree. Both people here show great confidence.

@YAWN....

6 ай бұрын

Lol, she just projects stupidity...

"I like your Christ, but I don like your Christians. You are so unlike your Christ" - Ghandi

@greglaprade7507

4 жыл бұрын

There's truth in that... And why we need a Savior.

2:47 "Your VERY close-mindesness..." LOOLLLL

@ophiolatreia93

3 жыл бұрын

You're

"Show me the evidence" ..."lt's in the museums"... repeat for an hour

Dawkins should be nominated for a Nobel prize for his patience alone.

Well, here we go. I'm watching this. Wish me luck, guys.

@georgepatton93

10 жыл бұрын

good luck, i came out with a few dead brain tissues

@1:34..."teach the controversy".. There is no "controversy", evolution is fact and the bible is a collection of bronze and iron age mythical scribblings.. "The purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome it"- LK

@007TruthSeeker

10 жыл бұрын

Apparently you have not noticed that some highly educated people, like myself, completely disagree with you. Isn't life interesting?

@KrisMayeaux

10 жыл бұрын

Facing questions and answering questions is a huge part of education. To deny the controversy exists is like denying the Holocaust. You invalidate ignorance by dispelling ignorance. Is Darwinism so weak that it cannot speak?Atheist activist Eugenie Clark of the NCSE (the only thing this org does is promote evolution/global warming and ridicule opposing views, while never answering questions from opponents) admonished her followers "Don't debate Creationists (including ID theorists) because you'll LOSE!" Well, there must be valid evidence of Creationism and Intelligent Design if she is already accepting defeat to the point of advising all evolutionists not to debate because they'll lose!! I, for one, applaud Bill Nye for having the courage to debate Ken Ham of the Creation Museum this month. Why shouldn't atheist evolutionists answer and tell us their evidence!? If they want to teach it to all children, then answer the scientists who have alternative interpretations/explanations. "Automatically rejecting dissenting views that challenge the conventional wisdom is a dangerous fallacy, for almost every generally accepted view was once deemed eccentric or heretical" Stephen Gould

@crispusattucks4007

4 жыл бұрын

If evolution were a fact, it wouldn't still be called a theory

@garycampbell5087

4 жыл бұрын

@@crispusattucks4007 what do you mean if it was a fact it wouldn't be called a theory, you obviously don't know what a theory is, a theory is the written explanation of how something works ,it's not a hypothesis. Try reading some basic educational books, sorry maybe your only a minor and will learn these things as you go through school

@crispusattucks4007

4 жыл бұрын

@@garycampbell5087 Are you happy that those books told you what to think?

I have enormous admiration for Richard Dawkins for having the self-restraint not to laugh at this woman and actually engage her a respectful discourse. Keep up the good job of putting the creationist quacks in their place and shedding light on the so-called controversy about evolution!

Having a bad day so I came back here just for the comments...they cheer me up☺

"There has been an effort within the scientific community to sensor out creationism" LOL. Someone hand this woman a textbook, please.

1:22 She claims (paraphrasing) that "many times data used to bolster the idea of evolution turned out to be fraudulent." He asks her "What's an example of that?" She deliberately ignores his question and just keeps rambling on.

She seems to be very concerned with material evidence for evolution, yet believes in creationism which has absolutely no evidence... Hmmmm

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

How did you get around the first verses of the bible with God creating and giving life? Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

"Where did you study science?" "See that's the thing, I didn't"

I don't how he did an entire interview with her. I've watched one minute and I can't take more

Drinking game: A shot every time you hear her say "Show us the evidence?/Where's the evidence?" Watch your liver evolve into a hardened mass in just over ten minutes.

@lesnagy3539

10 жыл бұрын

If you lasted 15 minutes you would be pronounced DOA at hospital with Alcohol poisoning.... Listening to her whining irritating tone is so annoying.. Show me the evidence that Wendy has a brain... Id be impressed...

"Scientists are claiming that they're the only ones who can speak on [science]" She makes me sad to be a human being

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

It's like.. yeah that's what makes them scientists! specialist in their unique field of study! it's like saying engineers or doctors are claiming they are the only ones that can speak on their craft.. some people don't seem to listen to what they say and really see what they are conveying.. introspection I believe is the word..

You know when you just know someone has bad breath by looking at them?... She is one of those people

@ritchiethomas6850

3 жыл бұрын

F

I wish they could compile all this into 1 part. its been over a decade!

@vshah1010

Жыл бұрын

They have the whole interview on another video. It's about 1 hour long.

I love how Wendy, who is super close minded, is saying that believing in facts is close minded. Plus she's never studied evolution so she knows barley anything about it, plus she keeps saying there is no material evidence for evolution (even though there is tons) she keeps saying that DNA doesn't count as evidence (even though it does) she says that you're showing evidence to people who don't except it shows that it's false (it's not we can't make people take facts as facts) and the reason why the evidence for evolution is because they refuse to believe it, not because it isn't true. When they say show us the evidence science does it, they just refuse to believe it's evidence.

@cameronpruitt8339

2 жыл бұрын

Completely dodged the question of where she studied science.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

@@cameronpruitt8339 as if RD follows science. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. ""There is no evidence for any supernatural being of any kind. So it goes against the spirit of science." --Richard Dawkins We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

Guess what macro evolution is: micro evolution that's gone on for a long time.

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

speciation is a fine example, there was an observation done on two groups of birds (I believe) that were geographically separated over many generations, and surprisingly enough the two groups were no longer able to reproduce with one another they had drifted to far genetically and were no longer compatible.. now imagine that occurring over millions of years, they would very different. to me, evolution is just an error in copying, sometimes it's beneficial sometimes not so much, if it happens enough you get a different creature. there are examples of evolution today in folks with genetic disorders, turns out some mutations may harm the organism in time but surprisingly protect against other maladies. some people have mutations in the shape of their red blood cells that actually protect against certain infections, bam evolution.. if you don't like the word evolution you can just call it "change" lol

The most acute case of Duckspeak (cf Orwell) ever captured on film. A specimen of near total and beautifully ornate cognitive dissonance, thankfully tagged and preserved for posterity. Darwin himself would have been delighted to have netted and pickled a rare bird like this. It's not the doubleplusgood duckspeaker's brain speaking, it is her larynx; viz the deadened stare in the eyes throughout. Like a peacock's tail of thought-terminating clichés, canned talking points, and maudlin bathos. Just brilliant! This should be required viewing for all high-school critical thinking classes.

@thomasaskew1985

5 жыл бұрын

You nailed it. Wendy is a really stubborn person trying to masquerade as an intelligent person. She dodges all questions Dawkins asks and then denies the answers he gives to hers. T

She has this very eerie permanent smile which really puts me off for some reason

The Bible is still being published today. Arguably that's a 2000 year old mistake being carried over into the 21st century.

@ramzabeoulve7333

10 жыл бұрын

Maria. H Child Indocrination

@Garlly34

4 жыл бұрын

It just give people a reason to live. I think something is fine to be spread as long as it teaches something good, and doesn't limit their perception. These people are closed minded because believe everything is Literal and don't want to analyze different perspectives

it's like she has taken 54 Prozac and is trying to be Jimmy Stewart at the end of A Wonderful Life.

So good of her to point out how much more loving and accepting the religious community is of their fellow humans.

wendy wrong

Crazy woman!!!! RD did a great job. I couldn't talk to her and keep from laughing

"I just made you a cup of tea". "How do I know it's tea?" "Well, it tastes like tea, looks like tea, and we call it tea and this is widely accepted and indisputable" "I don't accept it's tea" 🤯🤯😤😤😡😡🤬🤬

I just don't think creationists understand evolution. One species does not turn into another overnight. It is gradual, slight mutations in DNA, which create slight differences until we classify them as different. Truly we are all the same, just with different mutations that branched from one organism that just happened over the long period of time to have the chemical make up to "live". How do you explain breeding of dogs? We rapidly evolve the dogs to new species through selective breeding, which in nature only occurs over long periods of time.

@lesnagy3539

10 жыл бұрын

Creationists understand one thing only..The bullshit they derive from there bible. No use even going any further.. Crazy as that sounds thats the whole argument...Biology and evolution are sidestepped by these Creationists or as i prefer to call them in a condensed version...(CRETANS)...

Wendy's fake smile got to me. I commend Richard for remaining calm all through the interview.

This interview literally made me collapse! The sheer ignorance of this woman and her unwillingness to listen to what Richard is saying, made my blood pressure climb so high that I stood up from the computer shaking my head and fainted. The power of the woman’s stupidity nearly killed me !

@Paige-Turnner

3 жыл бұрын

He wouldn't listen to her either...

@timothywait9457

3 жыл бұрын

Jorden Wardllaw if you fainted you must have taken her seriously

@jordanwardlaw6352

3 жыл бұрын

@@timothywait9457 What ? That makes no sense Lol

@princegobi5992

11 ай бұрын

@@Paige-Turnnerthat’s because there is no “contending” point of view, their views are not on the same level here. She is completely wrong, why should he listen to her?

Religion is first & foremost a BUSINESS & it's her job to defend that business. She won't accept the evidence she should have seen at the Smithsonian & also presented by Dr. Dawkins. Religion is a huge & very profitable, very influential business. It has billions of believers & supporters & to maintain itself, it must keep the message attractive so the money keeps rolling in. Religion uses it's wealth to hire people like her, to defend it, they hire lobbyist to push for special treatment by governments & to get their beliefs taught in schools. Every major religion uses both bait, the empty promise of "heaven", & fear from the empty threat of the horrors of a "hell". Doesn't it seem odd that "hell" & it's horrors don't appear until the new testament & Jesus, the man who allegedly said he came to bring war? He also said he was there to complete the law by adding love one another.

"a loving creatorrrrr" 😂

It's like trying to tell a kid there is no Santa Claus even though you've got a catalogue of receipts.

Richard Dawkins is one of the most brilliant men on Earth.

@wesley6442

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed, such respect for this amazing educator of science, I owe a lot of thanks to him as well as other minds that freed me from religion years ago

"Where did you study science? " Ouchi!

Saying humans are not part of the primates is like saying lions and tigers are not cats, why is that so hard for creationist to accept?

@leonscott543

10 жыл бұрын

Because there's no evidence to accept it... The only evidence you have is that they slightly look like us and you have a few skulls that were dug up at different times through history. That's evidence that those species back there existed, but that's not evidence that they were our ancestors

@crunch9876

10 жыл бұрын

There is genetic evidence clear and simple.... Any archeological evidence can bolster th evidence that's already there but even if no fossils were found genetic evidence itself is enough

@mesothorium

9 жыл бұрын

leon scott DNA and genetics have proven it a long long time ago. Cold hard facts, i suggest you read up on it beforte saying that there is no evidence. We are Primates. The end, Not hard to accept really. . . Unless you base your entire world view on a moldy, inconsistent, written by multiple people over a long stretch of time, book. That was written by people who had no knowledge about genetics, that had no knowledge about astronomy, that had no knowledge about science. In other words ignorant people, But hey you can not blame them right? No you can't, but you can blame the people who are alive at this day and age, for accepting those ancient falsehoods. So stop being ignorant, and learn a thing or 2. Knowledge is not dangerously, it is enlightening.

@mesothorium

9 жыл бұрын

ray salmon The key sentence here "you don't think there is evo biology" . . It is not what you think, it is what has been presented by us through facts and repeatable science. How do you think we manufacture vaccines? How do you think we are able to study Neuroscience. So many crucial study area's depend on evolution. This is not a case of what we think as individuals, but was is reality. And reality may not always conform to our own beliefs. Beliefs are just that, beliefs. Facts however are proven things, things that have been tested, rigorously, by many different people. To all come to the same conclusion. The bible is a great piece of literature, it is a great epic. But should not ever be taken seriously or as a guideline. Never ever. Science may not hold the answer to everything, yet. But it is far better to just say, we do not know yet, instead of presuming an ever greater mystery. Do not see this as an attack on you as a person, i see no benefit in it what so ever. Reality is far more interesting than fantasy ever will be.

@crunch9876

9 жыл бұрын

at this point evolution is a fact.....

"Hello I have arrived for the discussion. Where shall we go to comfortably discuss and debate ideas?" "Oh right here!" *takes a step to the left* "Right here in the hallway? Can we at least sit down?" "NO"

Where shall we go then, well how's this 😂.

@iannuendo

8 жыл бұрын

Haha!

"philosophies built on evolution often lead to horrific abuses to human beings"... holy shit get this lady a history book on the church.

Alright, getting ready to watch the whole thing, and I'm a little nervous. I've heard legends about this trainwreck interview. Is it actually that painful to watch? Well, no time like the present...

Wow, the sheer density of that woman is astounding.

Incredible patience from Richard Dawkins!

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

If only he used his brain. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. ""There is no evidence for any supernatural being of any kind. So it goes against the spirit of science." --Richard Dawkins We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

@HappySpanners94

2 жыл бұрын

@@2fast2block mate, this was 8 years ago. Not sure how any of what you have written disputes my point of him being patient during this interview.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

@@HappySpanners94 so what it was 8 years ago, did you change your mind since then? Is Richard any less stooo-pid than what I showed. You are responsible for what you put..."Incredible patience from Richard Dawkins!" as if Dawkins has some evidence on his side. He believes in the absurd and Wendy had to put up with him.

@HappySpanners94

2 жыл бұрын

@@2fast2block bit cringe mate, lay off the crack before you start watching you tube

I think my brain is degenerating just from listening to this woman speak. I think I'll stop listening.

@Sartjediebee

4 жыл бұрын

Don't! Know your enemy.

The clearest example of circular logic I've ever seen.

Richard Dawkins doesn't deserve this kind of treatment.

Laughed so hard at 7:20 - 7:33. Dawkins: "Yes I know you're going to talk about peppered moths and Haeckel's embryos". Wright: "No, no, in fact what I was going to talk about was what they claim to be the evolution of the fetus in the womb" Dawkins: "Yes, Haeckel's embryos"

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Wendy was right, not Dawkins. RD is plain stooo-pid. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. ""There is no evidence for any supernatural being of any kind. So it goes against the spirit of science." --Richard Dawkins We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

I spoke w a creationist once, a rather unfortunate discussion. He actually believed that the Earth was only 6,000 yrs old because that's when Adam and Eve were "put" on Earth, that even though they only had sons, we are all direct ancestors of the first humans, that the Earth was created before anything else in the universe, including light, and that the Earth was originally all water before "god" created land. What I learned was that a creationist, in order to believe all that nonsense, had to completely disregard almost all scientific findings and nearly all facts. They force themselves to believe that all scientists had no idea what they were talking about, because the only person who could possibly understand the universe was "god". It was very frustrating because no matter what fact or scientific law I presented him with, such as radiometric dating to prove the Earth was over 4 billion yrs old, he countered by calling them "facts" (he used parenthesis) and saying that I put to much faith into science. The worst part was his argument for creationism, was the exact argument he should have been using against it. It was like talking to a 6 yr old who couldn't understand simple concepts and their only defense when cornered with commonsense was, "nuh uh".

@TheKassie1987

10 жыл бұрын

I have had many of those conversations as well... and correct me if I am wrong.. but my story about the rejection of faith (at least the books and common dogma's) allready began in early childhood. Call it a bullshit meter if you will, or call it a hunger for how the world really works. From early on I was interested in other cultures, dinosaurs, cosmos... so that when I had biblical class I allready disagread with the pastor telling me that man came from a rib, or that the earth was 10.000 year old (at that time I was eight or so). I even got expelled from class for that, and my parents where phoned that I disrupted his lecture and was a very bad boy. I couldn't know then that many other statements in the bible were also untrue. But from then on I knew that something was terribly dodgy with his teaching, and that the rest of his tellings were to be treated with great suspicion. The next weeks I started raising many conflicting questions to the pastor for which he didn't have an appropriate answer, further weakening his credibility. What still puzzles me to this day is: How is it possible that I had that as a kid.. that hunger for truth/science, or a high BS meter... wanting things to be crystal clear and backed up, longing for fair and universal truth for everyone. While others never seem to learn that, not as a kid, not as an adult. And want their believes to be the truth. The solving of religion has to be found in that psychological tendency I believe. Actually Sam Harris is doing a research on that... why people reject science/universal truths.. even if it's made crystal clear.. and prefer to believe in false things. That rejection is the pathology about it, and I believe we should treat it as such.

@Call_Me_Echelon

10 жыл бұрын

I know exactly where you're coming from. I started believing in god not because I was actively taught there was a god but because my parents believed there was and it just rubbed off on me through prayers, such as god bless mommy and daddy and general comments made that implied god existed. When I was around 6 or 7, and since we were Catholic my parents started me in CCD, which of course is the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine. We never went to church except for Christmas and Easter and it is was more on the demand of my grandmother, but my parents wanted to have an understanding of our religion, which was good in a way because I am now educated on religion and I'm not just making blind observations and judgments. I don't remember exactly when I started having doubts, but I remember it first started when I had doubts about the doctrine of the catholic church and I do remember that by the time I was confirmed by the church I had serious doubts that God existed. It seemed that the more I learned, the more questions I had, and the less sense religion made. As I got older and further from the church, it was like I was able to see a bigger picture, I was on the outside looking in now. I learned that when you are active in church it's like constant brainwashing. You can't see the forest for the trees, and every tree was someone or something reaffirming god's existence. Free of the mental constraints formed by religion I was able to ask my own questions and doing my own research and the things I learned quickly began adding up and disproving the things I learned from the bible. I'm now so far removed that I'm able to form my own conclusions and find religious people almost laughable because of their ignorance. What saddens me is how they can't see how crazy and at times stupid they appear by the things they say and do. I think creationism is the pinnacle of religious ignorance because to believe it means you have to completely disregard real, tangible facts and evidence. Even common sense tells you that the Earth is older than 6,000 yrs old. So you have to be either brainwashed or a complete idiot to believe that every person on Earth are ancestors to Adam and Eve, even though they only had sons. Separation from religion will benefit all of mankind, it will alleviate this kind of superstition and basically take the blinders off.

@sergioswaqq19

10 жыл бұрын

it probably is there is evidence for both, So i don't know.

@Call_Me_Echelon

10 жыл бұрын

I guess that depends on what you consider evidence. And valid, verifiable evidence is devoid in the bible. The parts of the bible were compiled hundreds of years after Jesus died, from stories that were supposedly written by eyewitnesses but none of them can be substantiated. Many stories were only passed down through word of mouth and there's no telling how much the original version changed as it was told from person to person. What's funny is that the U.S. Court of Law won't allow hearsay, yet some people base there entire belief system on what some people said happened over 2,000 yrs ago. If I were to tell you about talking donkeys, walking on water, rising from the dead, and parting seas, you'd think I was full of shit, but a couple of tax collectors and fishermen who lived thousands of years ago tell it and now millions of people accept it as fact.

@TheKassie1987

10 жыл бұрын

Steven C Yes, so even more respect to you because you were part of a the church (or doctrine as they rightfully call themselves). And you managed to break free.. however, I have a friend who had it pretty bad during his struggle to make peace with his indoctrinated upbringing. In the end he ended up with this modified personalised christian god. Somewhat more too buddhism, and based on the values. I don't even mind the stupidity of many religious folks... I am also stupid on many subjects.. (I can't fix my car for instance, or bake bread, or do mathemathics). But I have encountered so many remarks/judges by christians that I am not a good person, or that I will go to hell.... even had 2 christian girlfriends which went bad because of it (family disaproving, stating I will go to hell, or won't raise my kids right). So in that sense the consequences of religion are very real in my life, and absolutely not in a positive way. And the people who make those claims don't really care for everyone on the planet, don't really care for the environment, they didn't study social work or practice it. They didn't went on voluntary programs to Africa like I did. They just cannot seem to grasp the fact that you could be a very good human being if you don't believe in God. And in a way you cannot reason with them. You cannot even defend yourself in a proper way. So in that regard I see religion in the same way as for instance the slavery, racism/apartheid. Which were also based on very unfair and unscientific claims, but people acted accordingly to it. And then you begin to see the sheer narcisism that is involved with religious folks. ''I believe in God, and I have eternal life, I am saved so therefore I am perfect'' And all the people who are less off than me... well that's obviously because God loves me more... the narcisstic stupidity, the unequality, and the different standards is what I find to be the saddest thing.

I'll go get the popcorn!

"Scientists are claiming that they are the only ones who can speak on this issue." Well, yes and no. No, they are not the only ones who can, but YES that would make sense! Questioning a scientist's ability to interpret scientific findings is like a store owner (with no legal education) trying to tell a lawyer how to handle a case. My Point: we all have the right to speak on any given "issue", but don't be so surprised when the people who are trained to operate within a field, are the ones who do it the most effectively.

If brains were Dynamite she would not have enough to part her hair!

9:35 - "Evolutionists are still lacking the evidence to back it up"! Is she serious? She just shredded what little credibility she might have had.

Wright was interviewed by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins for his 2008 programme The Genius of Charles Darwin, in the episode entitled "God Strikes Back". Dawkins wrote of the exchange in his 2009 book, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. In a book review for The Guardian, Wright's dialogue with Dawkins led palaeontologist Richard Fortey to write that "one sympathises with Dawkins's attempt to talk evidence with convinced creationists" and that Wright "would have most rational souls tearing out their hair."Sarah Lyall of The New York Times said "it is as if [Wright] doesn't hear him". - Wikipedia's entry for Wenty Wright

Damn! Richard Dawkins is a very patient man