I notice that you have resolution on "auto" in touchstone pro. You can change that to "high", it will give much better results.

I use RF Explorer scan regularly and I don”t use touchstone since it limits RFE, that’s why you get that. I use RFE with its Python framework which allows to get access to RFE resolution. So, my advice is to quit with Touchstone.

@NicholasRadina

8 ай бұрын

Thank you! Excellent advice!

@mariafarias7459

8 ай бұрын

What is that python framework you say?

@conorm2524

8 ай бұрын

Can you elaborate on the python framework?

Can we get field strength data using rf explorer?

Would using a better antenna like an A1031u help with resolution or is it purely the software?

@NicholasRadina

8 ай бұрын

Great question! And you are correct, the issue we see here with this process (Tocuhstone and RF Explorer) is due to software limitations/process and not the antenna. Thanks for watching!

Would it help to use 'the github method' or do higher resolution on Touchstone?(4096 sweep points) How does it compare with Axient scan result?

@NicholasRadina

8 ай бұрын

Thank you! Do you have a link you could share to the GitHub?

@imdomtrotta

8 ай бұрын

following this @@NicholasRadina

@pawestapor5542

8 ай бұрын

I think KZread is deleting links so just google search for rf explorer detailed scan

one word. rfexplorer detailed scan