@LastStandGamers you might want to test the railgun turrets in vanilla, or in a world without Weaponcore/other weapon mods. A lot of the time when I make custom turrets in vanilla and paste them into a world with Weaponcore/other weapon mods, they'll erase the data on the custom turret controllers. those turrets look sick tho

You can't just show us a ship with big F*ck off turrets like that, and not show us the havoc they can wreck!

@lucasn4077

5 ай бұрын

I built my own 8 barrelled rail gun turrets and tested it on workshop downloaded battleships, it’s really underwhelming because the guns just do a straight penetration wreaking havoc inside the ship but it doesn’t look impressive from the outside sadly

@henry7696

5 ай бұрын

exactly...basically a clickbait vid lol

@nobob8564

5 ай бұрын

@@lucasn4077 Ya, but this ship has 5 sets of 8 barrels. I'd imagine that'd look quite a bit more impressive.

@lucasn4077

5 ай бұрын

@@nobob8564 5 sets of 6 which only a maximum of three can be bared on a target at once, and I’ve blasted capital ships with my gun upwards of 20 times and it was still operational to a certain degree. It looks cool but it’s bite is underwhelming

@nobob8564

5 ай бұрын

@@lucasn4077 Well, I still wanted to see it, regardless. You can't change my mind on this.

Imagine the power requirement

@evanlereun2007

5 ай бұрын

15 large nuclear reactors

@originalamerican9396

5 ай бұрын

Just use the arc reactor mod and select the reactor that is the equivalent of 100 normal reactors.

@themonument5369

5 ай бұрын

If it was ion

@alecdeter1999

5 ай бұрын

Enough to fight god I mean look at it its basically got spinal mounts and Deck guns for days terrifying

@suspiciouscheese4518

5 ай бұрын

6 large reactors is enough to power all the railguns at max charge with 204MW left over for other systems.

Looks more like a Royal Navy Battlecruiser doctrine design for commerce raiding and independent actions. I like it.

@magmat0585

5 ай бұрын

was thinking the same thing, it can kill whatever it can catch, and can run away from anything that could kill it

Finally! The first actual Dreadnought that uses such railgun turrets conception

Such a great design with so many details in and out! Engineering bay could use second door for safety

I've always loved these reviews, they're so good

Imagine trying to build this in survival

@suspiciouscheese4518

5 ай бұрын

I’d rather not, I have enough stress in my life thank you very much.

@highlandergames8538

4 ай бұрын

I'll do it then.

@Eggmayor

3 ай бұрын

It would take time, but probably worth it tho

@error5202

2 ай бұрын

VERY big 3d printer

@professormutant3252

Ай бұрын

@@error5202 definitely sounds like the way to go - any other way would just be *pain*

This is the first ship I've seen in a good couple of years that has made me actively say "wow" whilst watching the tour. That CIC is just incredible. Will definitely be taking some inspiration from the styling

A gorgeous ship. You can tell the creator had a real vision and practice.

What a fantastic build, I had been thinking about something like this built to be a sniper.

Never played this game but I love these videos

Thanks for another great review Aaron!

This is amazing!!!!!! Screaming internally!

Side note for anyone interested in building this, it actually uses blast doors on the rear thrusters, NOT LCDs, they are ridiculously well protected

The reason why the weapon controllers aren’t working is a keen bug, TCES fixed it but weaponcore breaks TCES

How wonderful! The creator gave equal attention making this a true art piece. The PCU has to be around 200k but it’s absolutely beautiful!!

This is impressive, it gives me a From the Depth vide.

I can 100% agree on the fact that looking at other peoples builds is like learning a new language because i play a lot of trailmakers and i usually put all of the logic blocks in one area and i looked at a workshop build a few days ago and everything was just all over the place

What type of reactor powering it? How much power in each weapon? How thick is the armor? These are the kind of questions that need to be answered for us to appreciate it as a battleship.

Incredible

Very nice design! She looks intimidating. A predator. Hope you get it worked out so we can see her lay it down.

1:26 The overall design looks good... but those 'staggered areas' at the front are exactly where you would need smaller guns - to ward off smaller craft attacking from the sides - with the intent of hiding from the main guns, to take out the communications array. In any event, this is almost the ideal concept of a 'pocket battleship'.

You can use the defensive AI block to lock the largest target available. This way your turrets won't get distracted by debris

WOW this is a beautiful ship. Personal observations: For the missile bays to be useful the ship has to be stationary.

Would love to see such a Behemoths in action!

what would you think about a system in space engineers to edit the type of gun on a custom turret (like from the depths) down to the RPM and MM?

if you are running Weaponcore, the Custom Turret Console is disabled due to incompatibilities between the scripts

flannel daddy approves of how you examined this ship

Damn you coulda led with "I cant use the guns."

Every player tends to place all the weapons on the top of the ship and will have anti fighter weaponry on the keel (bottom of ship), so I have been working on a ship class to exploit this weakness

@owenkegg5608

5 ай бұрын

I've noticed this too. I usually build my ships completely vertically symmetrical. We're in space dammit, a true brawler should be ready to combat a threat from any direction.

This is why I tend to like weapon core weapons unless you build the ship it's probably broken. and that's honestly the worse for blue prints by someone else, hard to find a ship that's been set up right so when you print it it prints the set up too.

That is a sexy ship

I'm surprised more people don't build railgun turrets. They seem like they could be incredibly effective; though they don't need to be quite that large.

@Erik_Ice_Fang

5 ай бұрын

Mostly because custom turrets really struggle with accuracy and the turrets have to be really large to look proportional. Each and every miss is 8 large sabots for this ship. And in gravity, those hinges and rotors might just collapse

wonder how long this took to build; I'm completely new to space engineers and this game is quite overwhelming but this design is beautiful

@mikulashorak5723

5 ай бұрын

Dunno but i build much worse ships and even than it takes me like 80h on average. So 300h maybe

I am new to SE and just got my little starterbase + rover done. I am very ambitious but I can not imagine ever building this in survival. ever.

I'll have to test the durability on those turrets; because every time that I try to make railgun battleship turrets the deformation physics means that even an rocket impact on an armored section winds up destroying crucial components and disabling the whole thing.

This....looks straight out of Stellaris base game; I qualify that as I play one of the Star Trek total conversion mods

Now that I look at it, something tells me that this thing would make a cool hidden shop to fight on a planet, where it would come out of a underground hatch and just rise up bow first like a rocket all UC 0079 style and start propelling itself spaceward to fight off another faction

Very impressive ship and nice design. However, 6:12 : A parachute hatch for slowing down rapidly? On a spaceship? Where is the drag that slows down the parachute coming from in a place where there is no atmosphere? 🤔🤣 seems funny to me if that is really a thing here 🤣

@LastStandGamers

5 ай бұрын

Perhaps when it comes to crashing on a planet ?

Reminds me of the Corsair from Infinite Space for the DS.

Kinda looks like an sdf ship

What's the mod for the planet in the background? Looks way bigger than vanilla. And is it a fully functional planet or just cosmetic?

Surprised to see a ship with railguns instead of the usual lasers and plasma

My biggest ship fits one the landing pad...lawd...

Looks like the voyager from startrek, but if it were made for battle instead.

@magmat0585

5 ай бұрын

was getting some battlestar galactica vibes from it, combined with inspiration from real world ships

The title means king of death in Latin if you wanted to know.

@wikedgaming

4 ай бұрын

All Legion ships have latin names. Good eye!

weaponcore is buged and custom turrets dont work with it right now

Just keep an eye on your 1st officer so he doesn't devolve and eat your fish.

Unfortunately I built this without Weapons Core. I will make a fix and update. Thanks for the info!

Is a Fast Battleship so yea I think is it very fast

Space Engineers in my experience likes to "forget" what is what on custom turret blocks.

Was this made before some blocks were added? I see gaps that could be filled in with the slope transition tip block. Like 1:27

The lack of CIWS bothers me. IMO theres no enough to defend against missile swarms.

You should look at the helghast cruiser

its very Hunt for Red October vibes

what are thoes planets, they are beautiful

DUDE USES MINY RAILGUNS AS CIWS ?

@ieycdofrjhhwiufhiufhbqfiyr4fgi

5 ай бұрын

They work soooooo well

i think, i know why the railgun turrets are not working. Weapon core. I used weapon core on my Server, and since the introduction of the custom turret controller block, i removed all weapon core related mods and weapon core itself from my server-mod list. it makes the block unusable. The option in the block, to assign weapons to the turret, will not be visible. Is this issue still present? Have a look. If yes, try to load the ship without weaponcore. Also, there was no weapon at all on the ship that needed weapon core at all, or did i missed some special weapons? Looks like vanilla weapons + custom turrets.

whats the planet in the background of the exterior tour?

Ibe been having that same problem with other peoples intricate work but the functionality is missing... has taught me how to kind of be able to rig up stuff liek rotating thrusters...

fast agile battleship = battle cruiser bassed on WWII standerds :D

Crazy ship!

Wheel suspensions block shots? Huh

can’t stand it when people call it a “battle ship” when made of paper thin light armor. hopefully it’s heavy on outside!

@weiserwolf580

5 ай бұрын

the problem is that if you make it out of heavy armor the ship doesn't fly anymore. SE it has not been balanced at all for 13 years

@d.thieud.1056

5 ай бұрын

Heavy armour isn't what makes a post-dreadnaught battleship The point HMS Dreadnaught and all big-gun battleships after her was to have so much long range firepower and be so fast that it could stay at long range where it's giant guns can devastate anything smaller

@suspiciouscheese4518

5 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@d.thieud.1056Traditional battleships have armour. That’s part of what makes it a battleship. Modern cruisers and destroyers are of similar size to the battleships of old, but their combat doctrine is what defines them as different. A ship with a focus on firepower that sacrifices armour for speed has traditionally been described as a battlecruiser, pocket battleship, fast battleship, or “large cruiser”. There are some other terms out there, but battleship has always referred to heavily armed and armoured warships. This ship is accurately described as a “fast battleship”, meaning it should still carry decent protection over its vitals, but that isn’t the focus. Of course, naval classification is all wishy washy and subject to technological doctrinal changes as well as the individual nation using the vessel.

@Plaprad

5 ай бұрын

@@suspiciouscheese4518 Also have to look at the Navy and it's doctrine. A US Fast Battleship is built for a different purpose as a Japanese Fast Battleship. One of the many reasons that ship "types" is pretty much useless unless you know the doctrine and missions of that particular Navy in that time period.

@suspiciouscheese4518

5 ай бұрын

@@Plaprad I didn’t even know the US had things they called “fast battleship”, but it would explain why ships like the Alaska are called “large cruiser” instead of any of the more conventional names.

I want to see the turrets rotate and fire with sound It looks like clang.

Looks like a Anteara ship

Am I the only one that thinks that looks like a elongated Imperial Arquitens from star wars

So basically it’s a battlecruiser essentially?

Survival viable for sure

Trim kipper lines.

I guess your PC melted when reviewing this ship?

WARNING! Capital Class Signature Detected!

dreadnought

Not enough guns for what it's worth. More dakka more better

"a fast battleship" Soooo... A Dreadnaught? Post-dreadnaught battleships were extremely fast and mobile, far more so than non-dreadnaughts. Thats why the battleship HMS dreadnaught didnt have to fear anything when she was launched, she could outrun anything that could possibly posena threat to her

@WulfgarOpenthroat

5 ай бұрын

While the HMS Dreadnought had a number of innovations including the turbine engines, what characterized a "dreadnought battleship" from pre-dreads was the all-big-gun main armament, which had a host of benefits that improved the effectiveness of it's weapons in addition to raw firepower, including fire direction and shot correction. Fast Battleship was something else, where battleships attempted to achieve high speed without significantly compromising armour or firepower. It was an informal label and fast was relative to whatever was typical at the time(ie the Queen Elizabeth class making 24 knots when 21 was typical).

@guru187

5 ай бұрын

Technically a fast battleship and dreadnoughts are not the same. Dreadnoughts are often referred to as pre WW1/ made during WW1 designs like example USS Texas is considered “the last dreadnought” being commissioned in 1914 while fast battleships on the other hand were typically made after WW1 and traded armor for speed and were often compared to or in some cases referred as battlecruisers like HMS Hood was considered by the Royal Navy to be a very large battlecruiser while other nations considered hood a fast battleship.

Having an "up" on a spaceship doesn't make any sense.

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to insist that you make a follow-up video when you've figured out why the guns don't work. You simply can't show a ship like this without having it blow a bunch of other ships out of the sky. It's just not done, I tell you!

@LastStandGamers

5 ай бұрын

I will see what I can do.

@wikedgaming

5 ай бұрын

I can help with that lol

@patrikhjorth3291

5 ай бұрын

To be clear, I don't mean this as a complaint. The "harsh" tone is meant as a joke, but I think you got that. That said, if you can manage a proper demonstration of this ship's massive firepower, that would be appreciated.

These look nice but are so exagerated in size and feature that I dont see how they could even be used in a real gameplay senario...

These ships look cool, but i dont like them because they seem to just be a waste of resources to me. i mean why dont you just make 10 smaller ships instead the the big easy slow target that gobbles fuel. All your eggs are in one basket, and the basket doesnt even have wheels.

@nathanbass6843

5 ай бұрын

Probably because just using smaller ships wouldn't have the required "fire-power." Yes, the 10 smaller ships altogether would have a lot of guns to fire, but those guns may be ineffective or useless against certain targets. Certain weapons may require a larger frame or sizable ammo/power requirement, which would necessitate larger ship designs.

@suspiciouscheese4518

5 ай бұрын

It’s worse for the server performance and a lot harder for the player to manage.