I love the simplicity, launch from cargo planes , independent missiles, safe standoff deployment, Powerfully impactful strikes, I'm for it.

@babalkhan1052

Жыл бұрын

উ

@CHNISD

Жыл бұрын

Don't need them new fighter jets. Simple missiles that might fuck up but it not be a huge deal. Let's build like 100 more c-17 instead of new fighter jets other than f-35s. 100 c-17 with 5,000 rapid dragon missiles.

@cam27932

Жыл бұрын

@@CHNISDlet’s also decentralize and unionize a large portion of our infantry Russia has Wagner group we oughta have 100s of Wagner groups of our own

@CHNISD

Жыл бұрын

@@cam27932 as long as it's actually well regulated and the armory isn't something like some dudes garage. Has to be military grade protection of mass amounts of military grade gear and weaponry. Can't be a place where a mass shooter could easily rob. Well regulated militias should mean just that. Well regulated. Not Joe blow and his cousins getting together on the farm. Should be professional militias that are well regulated.

@CHNISD

Жыл бұрын

@@cam27932 it concerns me the amount of homes that have massive amounts of firearms protected by nothing that the homeowner and a locked door. I feel like a lot of places could be robbed and become a liability for their community, and some crazy person steals all their shit and goes on a shooting spree. Should not be as easily accessible as that. Massive amounts of friearms and military gear should be protected with military level security systems. Should be well regulated.

This is exactly the kind of thing that the US military needs more of -- ways to extract big bangs out of pre-existing bucks. So often it seems that the US military's first instinct is to think that we need an incredibly expensive new platform. Whoever came up with Rapid Dragon deserves to be richly rewarded.

@JoeySav

Жыл бұрын

ohh trust me, i'm sure they are living just fine whoever created it.

@briananthony4044

Жыл бұрын

It's like China and Russia come up with e new surface to air missile, they fit it to land platforms then make a naval version to keep cost down. In the US different companies make separate missiles for each, like the Standard family for naval use and Patriot and Thaad for land use, keeping cost, and I suppose, profits up.

@josephastier7421

Жыл бұрын

@@briananthony4044 The Russians are famous for making many different types of missiles in the hope that something gets through. Some work better than others. The USA is famous for making only a few types and spending a fortune perfecting all of them.

@briananthony4044

Жыл бұрын

@@josephastier7421 Actually it is the other way around. The USSR often made a missile type then used it across all services, while the US services each went their own way. A good example in the US is the armies Thaad and the navies SM-6 and SM-3. They could have used the SM family from ground launchers and saved billions in development costs of the Thaad. Likewise RAM and ESSM from ground launchers could have been used instead of developing Patriot for short to medium range engagements and now we have NSSM using ground launched AMRAAMs which have the advantage of having their own terminal homing which also competes with Patriot. When the Tomahawk was developed, the USAF went their own way and developed the similar Boeing ALCM. Lightweight fighters, AF F-16 Navy F-18. Heavy fighter, AF F-15 Navy F-14. The USSR, by comparison, often used a system developed for one service, in another. Examples are the S-300 system, a land based surface to air missile system. It was also deployed on soviet cruisers and battlecruisers and carriers. The Mochka had such a system. TOR is another Soviet system used on land and at sea in ships from corvettes to aircraft carriers for short range air defence. The Pantsir system is used on land and sea. It is a combined gun missile system. Kashtan, navy and Tungusta, army also. Another is the armies Iskander, a hypersonic missile launched from mobile tracked launchers, modify the missile, and you have the air launched Kinzhal hypersonic missile. No need to design a new missile. The Russian Kalibre cruise missile can be launched from ground launchers, from submarines, surface ships and the air. Both the Mig-29 and the Sukhoi come in land and naval variants.

@josephastier7421

Жыл бұрын

@@briananthony4044 I mean the number of different missiles. The doctrine I have seen (I am not Russian) for a Russian fighter jet to defeat a more-capable US aircraft would be to send perhaps a half dozen missiles against it from standoff range, all of different types, in three waves of two missiles each, chosen by the flight computer to be different. Diversity is strength, and the American plane will have to defeat many adversaries with varying strengths and weaknesses. Only one of them has to work. From the American side, if they were to attack a Russian plane, they might send two or three AIM-260. The Russian plane would have to fight the same thing three times, and if it could do it once, it will probably be OK with the rest.

Simply brilliant. Adds task purpose to existing expensive equipment inventory with a tried-and-true record of reliable performance in combat. Somebody in Washington actually put on their Thinking Cap!

@davidcurry4433

Жыл бұрын

Really, i think it's a Pants idea.

@ransei8467

Жыл бұрын

どんなに良い武器を持っていても、米軍最高司令官がバイデンでは意味無いでしょう。 No matter how good a weapon you have, it doesn't matter if the Commander in Chief is Biden. 前ドナルド・トランプ大統領の2022年8月のビデオから引用します。 「我が国はアフガニスタンで降伏し、そこに死んだ兵士、アメリカ市民、そして世界最高の850億ドルの軍事装備を置き残した国です。」 August 9 2022 Former U．S． President Donald Trump： We are a nation that surrendered in Afghanistan, leaving behind dead soldiers,American citizens, and $85 billion in the finest military equipment in the world． 我が国は、多くの点で笑い話になっている国です。 We are a nation that in many ways has become a joke．

@ryanurquhart8436

Жыл бұрын

That whole balloon Drama 🎈 was a prototype of some kind, a hypersonic cruse missile launch platform . Probably from China .

@aeswere

Жыл бұрын

@@ryanurquhart8436 Ah yes, the cruise missile launch platform, with no ordnance

これ、爆撃機を作らなくても輸送機さえあれば即席爆撃機ができるってのがすごい。

@CHNISD

Жыл бұрын

Genius.

@user-xd1qs5tg1w

Жыл бұрын

ただ、成層圏近くを亜音速で逃げられる爆撃機と鈍足の輸送機とじゃ 対空砲陣地と対空ミサイル、迎撃戦闘機があるようなところに近づくのは難易度が違い過ぎるんじゃね？

@chrisholcombe137

Жыл бұрын

Like a balloon 🎈

@DavidCoxDallas

Жыл бұрын

@@user-xd1qs5tg1w standoff weapon: can be launched from nearly 1000 km away. no need to get close, that's why this is effective. the JASSM are themselves low observable. great for SEAD - Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses.

@yukupovaccinated4

10 ай бұрын

​@@user-xd1qs5tg1wだから射程約1000kmのJASSM-erを使う。 その距離だと敵の防空圏外だから対空ミサイルは飛んでこない。 さらに敵は発射プラットホームの特定すら困難を極めるだろう。 投下・発射されたJASSM-ERは指定された座標に向かって高いステルス性を持ちながら巡航し、赤外線画像による終末誘導により着弾も確実。 容易な飽和攻撃が可能となる。

Very innovative!! GO USA 🇺🇸

That looks terrifying! Way to go boys!

The best. Quality.

Rapid dragon is already in service. ready to deploy amidst Ticonderoga USA 1. LOL! ❤

We are salute to USA defense forces.. God bless.

効率化がエグ過ぎる

Absalutely.... Great weapons and tech

輸送機さえあれば容易に物量作戦が出来る有りそうでなかった画期的なシステムですよね。

Proud on America.

@sericasuis5353

Жыл бұрын

Fuck america terroristes

@danilomusiccribas9586

Жыл бұрын

infórmate. estos sistemas y muchos más junto al club "K" fueron diseñados por los Rusos .y por si no sabías ya el club "K" está metido en algún lugar de ee.uu y Europa 🤣🤣🇷🇺💪🏾💥💥

Good job 👍soldier

ミサイル配達もここまで進化 これぞロマン兵器

@antoniogonzalez8487

Жыл бұрын

中国人も同じことをし、すべてをコピーし、ロマンチックに見えなくなります

Sending my full support, my salutes, and my prayer for all safety.

このシステムがうまくいけば、本当に爆撃機の一部の任務を肩代わりできるのでは？ 日本もC-2輸送機で実施することを検討しても良いと思う。

Although the speed of such an invisible cruise missile is not fast, the shock caused to the place is amazing.

自衛隊が導入するってマジ？！

Wow fantastic 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

ロマンの塊だね、言うまでもない やっぱりアメリカは凄い‼️

@sericasuis5353

Жыл бұрын

les russes font mieux mon gars

@pajadge

Жыл бұрын

@@sericasuis5353 ウクライナの件見たらそんなこと言われても信用0だわ😂

@sericasuis5353

Жыл бұрын

@@pajadge en matière de technologies militaires les russes surpasse les américains. les américains ont 20 ans de retard sur les russes c'est les meilleurs aux monde. C'est eux qui fournisse la technologie a la Chine

@pajadge

Жыл бұрын

@@sericasuis5353 20年遅れてる兵器に蹂躙されるロシア兵😂😂😂😂😂😂

@sericasuis5353

Жыл бұрын

@@pajadge j'arrive pas à comprendre votre délire, ce qui se passe en ukraine, les russes ont déployer 5% de leurs effectifs et armements. il sont attaquer par 30 pays occidentaux mais ils tiennent, c'est ce qu'on appelle une puissance..ils ont les meilleurs avions de chasse ,les meilleurs missiles qu'es que vous reprocher à la Russie ???

Wow that's really came out because I seen that in video of new military missile from the air ..

この兵器システムは既存の資産を最大限活用できるので、費用対効果が良さそう。自衛隊も導入に向けて積極的に動いてほしい。 C-2、C-130H、Rに搭載可能な様に12式地対艦誘導弾能力強化型用ラックの作成。

@user-oe7pr5ww2m

Жыл бұрын

自衛隊はここまで必要なほど輸送機も爆弾も持ってないからね、戦闘機のみでもすぐ撃ち尽くす程度しかないので必要無いよ、日本の場合対地攻撃は巡航ミサイルに頼るほうが向いてる。

@n1k2-ja46

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oe7pr5ww2m 勿論、あなたの意見は的を得ていると思いますが、対抗手段をいくつも持っておく方がよりベターではないでしょうか？その為、複数のミサイル等を研究・開発しているのではないでしょうか。輸送・補給能力の向上は近々の課題と自衛隊も認識しているはず。もし予算措置が取られた段階で要求がなければ、本当に大丈夫か？と逆に心配してしまいます。

@user-oe7pr5ww2m

Жыл бұрын

@@n1k2-ja46 勿論予算がありゃ色々なオプションがあって損は無いですけど、現状じゃとてもこれを導入検討する状況にないですよ、先述したように”うちそんなに輸送機も爆弾もないがな!”って言われて終わりです....

@youtuber12148

Жыл бұрын

どちらにせよ財務省によって削られて来た装備・人員を大幅増させる時が来ましたね

@hasanar5179

Жыл бұрын

@@n1k2-ja46 I was already send of message to President Joe Biden in America, my father is American man Kiagous Mohammad Jacob Bentaib is owned of Southernward after of his father Kiagous Hussein Kalog Bentaib owned of Southernward and his grandfather Hadji Mohammad Taib Sultan Shariff Abdullah had Rasellah and owned of the Southernward, I need all of income of Southernward from water, electric, all of planted, all of animals and other income

America NII bosss senggoll doonkk 🔥🔥

That's actually kind of cool. At first I was like, "isn't that like dropping bombs?" But nope that is actually terrifying

@user-fh5lx6uz8v

Жыл бұрын

🤕

@BosonCollider

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, main advantage is that you don't need a bomber to deploy it, just a cargo ramp, and that it significantly outranges long-range anti air defence systems with 900+ km range (one version has 1800 km range). If it gets mass produced enough it could allow the US to just decommission more B-52s since this lets plain cargo aircraft do everything you would usually use a B-52 for and are actually useful for logistics as well instead of being a burden. Also, they are cheap enough that you can literally buy a thousand of them for the cost of one S-400 anti air missile system (1.2M vs 1.2B) and they can be made radar seeking, so you can have a fleet of cargo planes just permanently suprressing enemy air defences by firing every two hours for a hundred days so that you permanently have a radar seeking cruise missile loitering over an area which you suspect has an anti air battery.

@DrumToTheBassWoop

Жыл бұрын

​​@@BosonColliderhis proves the point that western militaries are moving towards the 'Interoperability' doctrine of equipment. Makes sense, if you can dual or triple use equipment, you get more for your money. Can't argue with that.

Who picks up all these damn parachutes we keep dropping 🤣

@TheMilpitasguy

3 ай бұрын

the Gazans

Perfect👍

⭐️

America has always been at the forefront of this

Lawd have mercy !!!!

*VERY; VERY, SICK WORLD !!!*

C-2と組み合わせたい

ついに形になったんか。衝撃的な効率化だよね。

これは飽和攻撃用ですな、大掛かりな発射装置を必要としない点も👍。

The extended range missiles have over 1,000 km and can penetrate reinforced concrete over a meter thick with a 450 kilo warhead.

@CHNISD

Жыл бұрын

Blow up all of Moscow without nukes with 5,000 of these

Took took took..CLAIM deh!

Another brilliant idea 😄

When I first saw this falling off from the plane and gliding it's way; my first impression was WOW

God bless US - INA🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

@user-fh5lx6uz8v

Жыл бұрын

🤕🙈

PLA: we will have 3 carriers and 8 055s soon. US: Well, how many cargo planes we have in west Pacific Ocean?

@nnnrrr9466

Жыл бұрын

兄弟，055可以打航母哦

Чудово!

Holy freedom fries this is awesome

RAPID DRAGON MISSILES SYSTEM having warm welcome

The air force means business with that huge payload in a single drop 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😀😀😀😉😉

This system would be ideal for deploying bunker busters directly on hardened sites.

Truth is we go 4000 cargo planes. Now we got 4000 bomber cargo planes!!

I think they will drop this at midnight when winnie the pooh is in the middle of his dream

This is a real show and real tools.

💪

I looks oddly effective....... overwhelm the theater.

Honor Harrington strikes again. Sure glad she's on our side.

ラピッドドラゴンとかいう中学生が考えそうな名前

@nnnrrr9466

Жыл бұрын

快速龙

👍👍👍

Very much to the taste of the Universe Safety Assassin

こりゃ凄い 日本も装備します！🚀🇯🇵💪

Great for emergency jetesin

Бу жуда фойдали ракета хар томондан, келажак

Wao

お手軽飽和攻撃

How in the heck we didn't think about it before?

God bless america...

Only those metal cages on your head gives you a headache 🤣 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💪

Another great idea from the United States of America military....... They're keeping us safe.

I don't understand the concept why they use pallet and chute when dropping the missiles. Why not drop them directly and activate before hitting the ground?

@user-fh5lx6uz8v

Жыл бұрын

🤕🙈

@chaosXP3RT

Жыл бұрын

Because they would fall to quickly and hit the ground. The parachute slows their descent.

@jerrygo-yq9js

Жыл бұрын

the reason for the shoots and the pallet is to orient the missle downward before releasing them and the reason for this is the propulsion system of the missles has to be primed first before starting up besides who would want a bomb to go off near the belly of the plane in case there is a malfunction actually i think it is the safest way to launch a dangerous munition

面白いシステムではある。今後に期待

See "The Fat Electricans" coverage of the Rapid Dragon system... He does an incredible job.

Parabéns EUA, muita tecnologia interessante de ponta sendo mostrada .

やべぇな 輸送機自体のガワはこの場合なんでもいいだろうから 高高度タイプからドロップ、民間輸送機に擬態してドロップなんかも出来るだろうし 既存のc-130やオスプレイもかなりの戦闘力持たすことができるってことよね

This is very cost effective. Respect to the company which came up with the idea

Palletized freedom dispensers.

That system looks like they made it out of stuff they already had laying around. Massive return on investment.

Good for the Crimean bridge 🚀

If the marines had this in the movie Avatar, they would have won.

Good strategy to change mindset of people about american and russian weapon Plan bro

That's a nice port you got there, would be a shame if someone, missile spammed it. xD

They need to make even bigger ones for the C-5.

@KuDastardly

Жыл бұрын

Or maybe Myria, the second An-225 if it ever gets completed after the war. >:D Just imagine if that Antanov airlift suddenly deployed Rapid Dragon over vital Russian strategic targets.

@7mmalltheway

Жыл бұрын

They have already teated C-5 to launch minuteman II in the air. 😅

@chaosXP3RT

Жыл бұрын

It's palletized, so you can stack as many as will fit in a C-5

I wouldn’t want to be on the business end of this….lol

This should have happened 30 years ago

これって前見た時も思ったけどミサイル4本入れる鉄格子の箱って要らなくない？投下訓練みたいに連続でボトボト落としてっちゃダメなのかな？

GOD BLESS USA

ゴイゴイスー

i think they tried this back in the 60s or 70s dropping an icbm out the back of a c5

I wonder if these could be carried beneath a 'Balloon'.

Another trick for the 130, he'll yeah Will be great for arctic strikes

If these scary missile system was disclosed, imagine those classified weapons that kept inside the banker.

强

Hi. How are you ☺️.my .all. USA.military.

This must be the mist significant advance in aviation warfare ever since the 1st bomb was dropped from a WW1 biplane.

@warrenpeas

Жыл бұрын

I wouldn't go that far. They just pushing a bomb with wings out a plane. I didn't see what this couldn't have been used 50 years ago

@MrNakedweasel

Жыл бұрын

I think it's a very big deal. And armed with anti-ship missiles, would allow nations to defend their territory from naval threats as well. Another game changer would be to equip 50,000 JDAMs with a wing kit and seeker head to attack moving targets. And these could be launched from Rapid Dragon, as well.

@davidcurry4433

Жыл бұрын

It's a pants idea.

@warrenpeas

Жыл бұрын

@@davidcurry4433 turning cargo planes into bombers is a great idea. Don't understand why it didn't happen 50 years ago

@BlackHawkBallistic

Жыл бұрын

@@warrenpeas because the technology to make cruise missiles small enough to work in anything but the largest cargo planes wasn't there?

Eat this Poetin !

Might work against 17th century nomads with bows and arrows. They are literally sitting ducks plus they are being dropped from a plane with an enormous heat signature.

@lockheedmartinf-22raptor73

Жыл бұрын

That's where I come in.

@siegfriedcxf

Жыл бұрын

that missile has almost 600miles range, what country would reach 600 miles away to kill a cargo plane, how about the b52 fly above you which is more important?

@jerrygo-yq9js

Жыл бұрын

nope whats the radar range of the opposing target the ford class aircraft carrier has a range of slightly less than 300 miles the missle range is 600 miles the delivery system will be long gone even before the radar picks up the missle signature besides how can one target defend against 100 shooters eg: 1 c17 delivers 45 missles only 2 c17 can overwhelm conventional defenses

Can they, uh, help forecast the weather?

Buena de fensa

Those cargo planes are going to be super vulnerable to a2a attacks, I assume these are long range missiles.

@user-fh5lx6uz8v

Жыл бұрын

Вы первый кто хоть подумал об этом.

@DavidCoxDallas

Жыл бұрын

1000 km

@chaosXP3RT

Жыл бұрын

These planes will fly outside the range of Anti-aircraft ground batteries. These a cruise missiles so, they have the range

昔のCODのキルストリークに大量のドローン攻撃ってのがあったが、そんなアホなって思ってたけど、まさか現実になるとは…

@MANUKE308

Жыл бұрын

スウォーム思い出しました

Chuan bị

Guess the balloon idea wasn’t up to par,then

I wonder if Lockheed would consider developing a stealthy 2 stage cruise missle with a reusable delivery system + projectile (less expensive) warhead. It seems like a practical solution to the expense.

@Schumacher73

Жыл бұрын

Then would be more liable to be captured intact and analysed by enemies.

@greyguy9767

Жыл бұрын

@@Schumacher73 gov doesn't care how much it costs. Theyv just ptint more money and more debt.

10 марта 1945г Токио. Ковровая бомбардировка зажигательными бомбами. Погибло от 90 то 100 тысяч человек, более миллиона бездомных. Так по доброму американцы склоняли Японию к миру.

This excercise was conducted in Poland, as part of training provided to Polish soldiers, to use ther JASSMs and Hercules.

@Shamim.111

Жыл бұрын

Thank you

@jerga2002

Жыл бұрын

Really they are preparing Poland for using this? Putin is getting cornered more and more with nothing else to lose…

I'm a product designer, so I like cool stuff, but sometimes I think that they make cool stuff for the sake of it and try to figure out a use later instead of filling a specific need.

@MarcGyverIt

Жыл бұрын

This has a distinct use case