The evidence of shia 12 imams is the length of this video: 12 minutes 😎🌚😂

This guy will never debate

@si8568

4 ай бұрын

@RUNESCAPER123 yeah that's why he hides. This video was a joke. Clearly he knows the 12 rulers were not the ones he talked about but you people are blind just want to do mutan with each other's sisters

@turkishempire-wl3bh

3 ай бұрын

he is coward bro

Thank you for responding. At 9:46 you mentioned the 12 imams were oppressed, imprisoned & murdered. Can I ask why they were murdered and why ahle sunnah respect those who murdered and oppressed them? Something doesnt add up 🤔

@BlackWhite-jr7mp

4 ай бұрын

Ahl as-Sunnah don't necessarily respect the murderers of pious Muslims! On the contrary the Rafidis, respect the murderers of Umar radiAllahu anhu etc. both of these were more pious than Ali radiAllahu anhu or his entire progeny (may Allah 'azz jall be pleased with the righteous among them). If Yazid is personally responsible for the martyrdom of Hussayn radiAllahu anhu then Allah 'azz wa jall will surely show him his place in the hereafter. Just because a vile, filthy Muslim killed Uthman radiAllahu anhu or Hussayn radiAllahu anhu we don't declare them kuffar! They might have been filthy Muslims who were seekers of power and glory, their evil deeds will take them to a place they wouldn't want to be in the herafter but Allah 'azz wa jall will decide about it. Forget Umar and Uthman radiAllahu anhuma, most sahabah radiAllahu anhum are kuffar according to Rafidis! If you tell this to a Hindu, even he will figure out that Rafidism is not Islam and is actually an enemy to Islam! Because, who would label the first Muslims (sahabah), the people who are the reasons most of the humans in our time are Muslim to be kuffaar - except an enemy of Islam who wants to destroy Islam by casting doubts on sahabah which leads to doubting the preservation of the Qur'an, the preservation of the Sunnah! In-fact, Rafidism is the greatest attack on Ali radiAllahu anhu, which seeks to portray Ali radiAllahu anhu as a weak, un-manly, cowardly figure who couldn't even revolt against Abu Bakr and Umar radiAllahu anhuma to get his right (khilafah), whilst Mu'awiyyah radiAllahu anhu fought to get justice for his innocent cousin killed (Uthman radiAllahu anhu). Now couldn't Ali protect his own wife radiAllahu anha against Umar radiAllahu anhum - according to Rafidis! What vile lies do Rafidis believe against Ali radiAllahu anhu! Anyone who attacks the Sahabah radiAllahu anhum attacks Islam - even a little brained kuffar knows this!

@AbulQ

4 ай бұрын

​@@BlackWhite-jr7mp Thanks brother for your response. Can I ask why you aren't willing to make Takfir against the Killer of the masters of the youth of paradise, but more than happy to make Takfir against the Shias? A bit double standards wouldnt you say? We genuinely believe Abu Bakr angered Fatima AS, that Muawiya fought Ali AS and Killed Hassan AS and that Yazid was responsible for the death of Hussain AS. Why would we not condemn whom we believe to be evil & oppressors? Is it not our duty to do so? It definitely does not make us fall under Kufr 🙂 It was also proven that not all of the Sahaba (May allah be pleased with the righteous ones) were good. Please refer to the other lectures in his series to find out more.

@BlackWhite-jr7mp

4 ай бұрын

​@@AbulQ, why would I make takfir of someone when he is not a kaafir? The khawarij killed Uthman radiAllahu anhu who was better than Hussayn radiAllahu anhu but you won't find most Muslims calling his killer a kaafir! Interesting, Ali radiAllahu anhu also didn't call this killer a kaafir but hated him to death - and would have killed him on getting the chance! This only shows that Muslims are just and treat even the vilest of beings with justice as ordered by Allah 'azz wa jall! We do not raise the sahabah radiAllahu anhum to the level of Prophethood - killing prophets is Kufr al-Akbar. Killing sahabah radiAllahu anhum could be kufr if proven perfectly - like the killer of Umar radiAllahu anhu was proven to be kaafir majoosi from Iran feigning to be a Muslim. Prove the killer of Uthman, Ali, Hussayn etc. to be clear-cut kuffar from sahih asanid - all Muslims will do their takfir! At least read a little bit about "double standards"! Double standard is claiming to be Muslim but not following the Qur'an (5:8) and the Sunnah on the command of being just towards even those whom you hate! Neither Uthman, nor Hussayn radiAllahu anhuma is greater to the command of Allah 'azz wa jall! Your beliefs are clearly, hatred and enmity for Ahl al-Bayt, be it for A'ishah radiAllahu anha or Ali radiAllahu anhu! Only an enemy of Ali can believe in the farce that Ali was cowardly and un-Islamic enough to see Fatima oppressed, killed and his so-called un-born foetus "Muhsin" killed brutally! Rafidis really lack basic reasoning skills! Even pathetic Hindus don't have their gods painted so bad - the Hindu god Hanuman is said to have burned half of Lanka whilst searching for his master's (Ram) wife Sita (all this is mythology and farce)! Those who wrote Rafidi mythology were clear enemies of Islam especially Ali! On an academic note, if you were to learn a bit of "Shi'a Hadith" and its reliability you would know that Shi'as have no leg to stand-upon, all their beliefs are myths based on so-called hadith that have no chains, or the chains are filled with un-known people (majhool) - which even Shias don't know! Forget that Rafidism didn't exist whilst ar-Rasul 'alayhi salatu wa salam was alive why would a Muslim even given a damn about Rafidism? How many sahabah "were good" according to Rafidis? We can count them on fingers! You clearly don't want to believe in Islam - just like Hindus who don't want to believe in Islam and raise hilarious objections but then go on to believing in farce, myths and illogical things! All the sahabah radiAllahu anhum were righteous - you are so anti-Ali, what was Ali doing with these so-called "non-righteous" sahabah? What did he do with Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Mu'awiyyah, Ibn Umar, Ibn Masud etc? Believe me, you people hate Ali to the core thus are hell-bent on proving him the most incompetent, cowardly, weak and insincere man! Why didn't Ali follow the commandments of ar-Rasul 'alayhi salatu wa salam? Didn't he have Iman according to you, why didn't he fight Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman to spread "Rafidism" (if he believed in it)? Did he leave Islam (a.k.a Rafidism) to save his skin? Na'audhobillah! If we agree with your fake-religion of Rafidism we will have to believe that sahabah radiAllahu anhum especially Ali, Hasan (who gave the Khilafah to Mu'awiyyah) etc. were not upon the Qur'an and Sunnah and probably didn't care about Islam's survival nor about the ahkam of Islam - they are portrayed as selfish people merely looking out for hegemony like Brahmans had over Hindus and cared only for their own skins not for the truth/Islam or ar-Rasul 'alayhi salatu wa salam's aqwal! Anyways, Ammar Nakshwani is a jaahil kid. He won't dare to debate any serious Muslim da'i (forget 'aalim); he knows that even if a Muslim handicaps himself in the debate and doesn't talk about how Shias don't have any true 'Ilm al-'Hadith and 'Ilm ar-Rijal still then no Rafidi can prove his religion - only history is enough to disprove entire Rafidism! I have read books from where Nakshwani is taking his Rafidi religion, believe me, Muslims in da'wah read Rafidi literature just for amusement. Which intelligent human will believe in Rafidis? You seriously need to start learning Islam because eventually you will end-up leaving Rafidism for Christianity or Atheism - just like modern Iranians are doing all because they were never given a chance to learn Islam and were forced to learn Rafidism which has nothing to do with Islam and doesn't make even basic sense.

@adgame0625

4 ай бұрын

​@@AbulQ This is all according to your story, there is no historical proof Muawiyah killed hassan ra. (but rather hassan gave him bay'a), and yazid killed hussein nor ordered, that is all according to your corrupted books.

@adgame0625

4 ай бұрын

He was talking from a shia perspective😑

Why shias can't preach religion without Sunni books ?

@rcmysm9123

4 ай бұрын

Why can't Sunnis deal with what's in their books?

@englishwithsaadk3561

4 ай бұрын

@@rcmysm9123 we deal it...but nobody accept u ..so u talk about our books 😂😂😂

@Rowayousuf

3 ай бұрын

@@rcmysm9123why are u so worried about us?

@rcmysm9123

3 ай бұрын

@@Rowayousuf It's not you particularly it's falsehood in general.

@irmairma5724

3 ай бұрын

@@englishwithsaadk3561 the family of the Prophet has a high, unimaginable rank by God, while you like to snuggle up with the hypocrites around you, give up and come to the right side and be a follower of Ali Fatima Hassan and Hussein ع they are the flesh and blood of the prophet, what more could you want? the blessed prophet Mohamed ص left the ahlulbait to the believers

MashaAllah brothers, may Allah bless you all for defending Islam.

Ammar, MashaAllah, a lot of inconsistencies uncovered 🎉

@hi-mq3gb

3 ай бұрын

🤣Ahle sunat have bhukri book it is made after the death of prophet Muhammad s.a 200+ years ago 😂 Shia Have a book Called Sulaim ibn Qas hilali which is wriiten after the death of prophet instantly in the Time of Hazrat Ali r.a.z, Now hence proved Shia have more Authenticity then Ahlesunnat If you wanf hadees of pary of Prophet Muhammad why not 😂 you read Sulim book must do debate again to Hassan Allahyari they will gave you right Guidence, May Allah help you to choose the right path The road of Ahlebait-e-Rasool s.a peace ✌🏻

JazakALLAHukhairan

Great work جزاكم الله خيرا

The hadith says 12 khalifa will rule the whole Islamic world. question arises how many rulers from the shia imams ruled the whole Muslim world??????

@sisekodeyi6604

4 ай бұрын

He said they don't have to rule😂😂😂

@AnwarHossain-ej4md

4 ай бұрын

@@sisekodeyi6604 without ruling became khalifa 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Nice.

12 minutes? Is this a fast food channel? A response video should be longer than the original video. But maybe your audience is not interested in proper research and does not have the time for it.

@MuhammadSalman7236

4 ай бұрын

Why do long when few do trick

@AbdulElsleiman-nc6xu

4 ай бұрын

There is no point in a longer video when the refutation happens in the first 2 minutes of the video. Here I'll sum it up for you in a 30 second read. The hadeeths state there will be " 12 rulers or Khalifa." not imams. And out of those who you call the 12 imams only two of them took on the caliphate. Is 12 equal to 2? Or is something not adding up here? Do I have to continue? I honestly don't know how or why people find it so hard.

@hi-mq3gb

3 ай бұрын

🤣Ahle sunat have bhukri book it is made after the death of prophet Muhammad s.a 200+ years ago 😂 Shia Have a book Called Sulaim ibn Qas hilali which is wriiten after the death of prophet instantly in the Time of Hazrat Ali r.a.z, Now hence proved Shia have more Authenticity then Ahlesunnat If you wanf hadees of pary of Prophet Muhammad why not 😂 you read Sulim book must do debate again to Hassan Allahyari they will gave you right Guidence, May Allah help you to choose the right path The road of Ahlebait-e-Rasool s.a peace ✌🏻

@MuhammadSalman7236

3 ай бұрын

@@hi-mq3gb how ignorant do you have to be to come up with this lmfao

@hi-mq3gb

3 ай бұрын

@@MuhammadSalman7236 Sura Al furqan ayat number 63 وَّاِذَا خَاطَبَهُمُ الۡجٰهِلُوۡنَ قَالُوۡا سَلٰمًا‏ Find the Right Tarjuma after you understand, Same I would say to you Good by waslam

The verse in the Quran itself hints that there will be 12 rulers of the Islamic world. Quran 33:33, where Allah (awj) states that he wants to remove the impurities from the Ahlul Bayt and keep them clean. If u look closely at the verse, 33:33 (3+3+3+3=12). Anyone who calls this a coincidence is blinded in their hearts. It's the same as a non-muslims stating that Quranic miracles are simply a coincidence. May everyone's fasting be rewarded this month iA.

@sirajabbasi8682

4 ай бұрын

Very logical 😂.. scientific 😅

@ahmedhamed1872

4 ай бұрын

@@sirajabbasi8682 quranic miracles are not scientific, when you limit god to science you can only go so far. Please, scientifically explain to me how Moses split the sea? How about how Prophet Muhammad pbuh split the moon? I don’t think u could scientifically do that, cause Islam is above science, a man made creation.

@sirajabbasi8682

4 ай бұрын

@@ahmedhamed1872 that's what i am trying to tell you, you wasted time to calculate 3+3+3+3=12, 12 means 22 imams.. good well done

@ahmedhamed1872

4 ай бұрын

@@sirajabbasi8682 respect 😭 mb lmaoo the laughing emoji conveyed a different meaning lool

@sirajabbasi8682

4 ай бұрын

The way you are trying to interpret things is just meaningless, try to understand quran, what's written in it. Not on patterns and calculations

Nice

What is the name of the ai voice?

Well research work Mashallah!!! Need of the hour!! Jazakumullah khaiir

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 kid did u even watch the video😂 Start watching from 5:02

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 what u didn't understand? Will u defend nakjawani?

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 watch 9:00 to end

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 which point of nakjawani was not refuted in the video?

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 obviously u will not understand the refutation because u are dumb

This video is amazing!

@Khaledf

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123 It's amazing because it exposed Ammar's stupid approach to the subject big time! You can't prove your imams from your own books, let alone from Sunni books! Not to mention, he neglected that 12 are supposed to be ( *Ruler* )! He said the companions of the prophet were excited because of #12!! OMG! 😂 The problem with this man and his ilk is that he deals with us as if he were in drama theatrical temples of Shia! No. Here, we're gonna meticulously dismantle your stupid arguments and expose them ruthlessly! So you may keep coping.

@Khaledf

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 Apparently you have not watched the video. You are just a troll

@Khaledf

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 Then turn your brain on and rewatch it. Easy!

@hi-mq3gb

3 ай бұрын

🤣Ahle sunat have bhukri book it is made after the death of prophet Muhammad s.a 200+ years ago 😂 Shia Have a book Called Sulaim ibn Qas hilali which is wriiten after the death of prophet instantly in the Time of Hazrat Ali r.a.z, Now hence proved Shia have more Authenticity then Ahlesunnat If you wanf hadees of pary of Prophet Muhammad why not 😂 you read Sulim book must do debate again to Hassan Allahyari they will gave you right Guidence, May Allah help you to choose the right path The road of Ahlebait-e-Rasool s.a peace ✌🏻

khalifa and imam are different things

Bother Farid(yt channel Farid responds)also refuted these garbage arguments

@abumuhammad6978

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123 You are still here? 😃

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 😂 Average rafida clown:

@abumuhammad6978

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 What "blud"? 😃

@user-pi7bc2jp5c

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123kid which part of nakkawani's video remain unrefuted?

but on a serious note who appointed abu bakr as a caliphate . isnt this the biggest bidah that we are making abu bakr the calipha when prophet did not him one

@somenodywhoyes

4 ай бұрын

Read sahih bukhari muslim and other authentic hadith booms akh

Did you make the video 12 minutes on purpose?

Blind Ammar cheerleaders incoming 😰 3........2......1....

@AbuHumaira_

4 ай бұрын

Ma sha allah they are not here😆

@AbuHumaira_

4 ай бұрын

May ALLAH ﷻ guide them

@arabianknight0000

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 stop embarrassing yourself. We are laughing at you and your Saywhat Ammar clown

@TheFaro2011

4 ай бұрын

It's him and his payroll friends, come in, clearly didn't listen to the content which rips apart their belief system

@JN-eq3gl

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123indeed😂 these guys are a joke.

where is the refutation exactly

Mashallah well done ✅ plz countinue expose these fake propgunda ۔۔۔۔

@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 which part of nakjawani's video remain unrefuted?

@zanabalmaliki5060

4 ай бұрын

bro roasted his own books

@truthlover8122

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 But he sees this knowledge in a wrong way and half-knowledge spreads among people It tries to find its beliefs wrong and gives its own style ۔half information and wrong concept is very dangerous ۔۔

@user-pi7bc2jp5c

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123kid which part of nakkawani's video remain unrefuted?, Don't tell me u gonna run now

The moment a sunni becomes a 12ever, all of these narrations become weak and untrustworthy

@mhmd1854

4 ай бұрын

They doesn't become weak, do you even know how shia narrations are graded ??

@amjadqureshi4622

4 ай бұрын

​@@mhmd1854through the guess work of scholars?

@mhmd1854

4 ай бұрын

@@amjadqureshi4622 I asked a question, if you don't know say then ask yours, so again this time for you directly do you know how shia narrations are graded ? As for you questions, your scholars didn't do any better with their guess work and with the erasing and adding and changing of hadiths

@amjadqureshi4622

4 ай бұрын

​​@@mhmd1854your rijal books has like 2 sentences for each narrator. In addition most of the time it doesn't even indicate when they are born and die. This means you can't even prove how a single chain is connected. So this is why I said guess work for your school.

@mhmd1854

4 ай бұрын

@@amjadqureshi4622 I asked a specific question, is it that hard ? Your subjective opinion without any proof is irrelevant, your subjective opinion of how a chain of narration and the rijal must is irrelevant, now again do you know how shia grade hadith, yes or no and if yes mention the grades

AsSalamOAlailum. The thing that bothers me most is the hypocrisy in the mainstream Sunni Scholars in particular the Wahabbis (not all of them). They claim that they love the Ahlul-Bayt but their actions contradict their claims. Imam Bhukhari had used (AlaihSalam) for the Ahlul-Bayt in his narrations and atleast 28 times for Syyeda Fatima (S.A). The action of Imam Bukhari,Ahmed Bin Hanbal and Shaf'i clearly show that it's correct and better to honour the Ahlul-Bayt and there's nothing wrong in using (AlaihSalam) for Ahlul-Bayt. But these Nasbis like Sheikh Asim etc etc say no no it's not recommended to do that. I'm pretty sure he said that because of his love for Ahlul-Bayt. Let me ask a question . If the Shia's honour Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) by using (S.A.W) then would you leave that because of reason that the Shi'as do that ? Of course not. Then why do so in case of Ahlul-Bayt? In Sahih Bukhari the Love of Ali (A.S) has been declared as the deciding factor between a hyporite and a Muslim and these so called lovers of Ahlul-Bayt (Sheikh Asim etc) don't honour the Ahlul-Bayt due to reason that it is done by the Shi'as. In addition I remember when a person asked him about saying Mawla for Ali (A.S) he simply said it was polytheism! Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) himself said that whom I am his Mwala Ali (A.S) is his mawla. Nauzbillah these nasbis don't leave any chance to degrade the Ahlul-Bayt for a mere reason that Shia's do that so we don't want to resemble them . On the contrary, the love of the early Sunni Scholars for the Ahlul-Bayt was exemplary and most surprisingly many of them were actually blamed of of being a Shi'a because of their love for Ahlul-Bayt. Among them Imam Shaf'i is at top of list. Even the Companions had extraordinary love for Ahlul-Bayt. Among them Hjr Bin A'ddi, Ammar bin Yasir (R.A) are worth mentioning . I would like to know how often in the Masjids do the Sunnis listen the virtues of Ahlul-Bayt by these Sheikhs in Jumm'ah Sermon .

@yourfriends

3 ай бұрын

Sunnis almost every Ramadan make cartoons about the virtues of Ahl Ul Bait for kids to watch (in Arabic)

@Angelo-Rules

2 ай бұрын

The most important hadiths Shias use, like Ghadeer, Thaqalayn, etc primarily come from Sunni sources. In every salat, we pray that Allah sends His peace (salam) and blessings (barak) upon the Ahlulbayt (as). Shias don't say the latter (though according to your books one shouldn't do Salawat that is not full). Also shias rarely send Salam. They always say Allahuma Sali.. not Allahuma Sali Wa Salim... (though in the Quran we are ordered to say both Sali & Salim and again Shias are forbidden from cutting Salawat, yet they continue to do it ) The Shias (i.e. Imamis) hate many/most of the children and relatives of the Imams. We Sunnis respect them, such as Zayd (ra), Jafar (rh) the brother of Imam Askari (as), the children of Jafar (especially Abdullah), Abbas (prophet's uncle), Ibn Abbas (son of Abbas), Aqeel Ibn Abi Talib (Ali's brother), Mohammed Ibn Hanafiya(son of Ali & brother of Hassan & Hussain). So do shias really love Ahl Ul Bait? In fact, we are the true followers of Imam Ali (as). Just as Muslims are the true followers or prophet Isa (as), not Christians. Without our sources, Shias wouldn't have things like Hadith-i Kisa. The problem is, you accept the hadiths you like, and discard the hadiths you dislike because of emotions

@AMMARYASIR-ih6ie

2 ай бұрын

@@Angelo-Rules Brother I'm not a Shi'a .

@Angelo-Rules

2 ай бұрын

@@AMMARYASIR-ih6ie I know

The best fairy tale ever told

@rcmysm9123

4 ай бұрын

Disbeliever

This is completely ignoring the concept of Raj'a

NakshJewwani should just accept the debate and put the matter to rest.

Iman mehdi is a Pakistan Iv heard 😃

i used to be shia but thanks to this channel i have become sunni but my family make dua for my family guys please they also bring up "sayed" amars vidoes thank you Sunnah Discourse for debunking his videos during this ramadan may Allah keep you guys stead fast.

@user-pi7bc2jp5c

4 ай бұрын

Alhamdulillah

he sounds like a little kid 🤣🤣🤣

+1

How similar 12er is to Catholicism and how one Bishop comes out infallible! Mind boggles..... It's actually scary how close they replicate the same set up and cannot see it. This guy's accent is so annoying, awful Arabic pronunciation on that garbled Persian accent on English

@mhmd1854

4 ай бұрын

As if your caliphs and all of the sahabah were not infallible and you don't treat them as gods What about the prophet's infallibility did they take it from christian doctrine ?

@TheFaro2011

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123dude don't you use this month to pray or anything? Child of muta "bakri" doesn't mean anything, it's not the insult you think. The truth is, the comment doesn't inspire you to see why your set up isn't original and really mirrors a shirki religion which the protestant faith broke off because it was so much, what does that say about your belief?!

@zanabalmaliki5060

4 ай бұрын

isnt the prophet infallible? so why can't his blood be infallible and pure i mean he was raised to the heavens

@user-pi7bc2jp5c

4 ай бұрын

​@@zanabalmaliki5060so ur " imams" are the only one who is related to the prophet through blood?

@user-pi7bc2jp5c

4 ай бұрын

​@@RUNESCAPER123kid which part of the video remain unrefuted?

Nice commentator :D

Anyone who hates on Shia are clearly not Muslim. Let that sink in

@TheFaro2011

4 ай бұрын

Lol. It's not hate though

@muxishine

4 ай бұрын

It could be argued that if someone hates on them/their beliefs, then their imaan is correct.

Very very weak response. It’s embarrassing. Please go study more. Don’t do a response if your not prepared. As always truth hurts

Your argument is weak!

@adgame0625

4 ай бұрын

Is that what you convinced yourself

There are 30 paras of quran, khulafa e rashideen ruked for 30 years, hence khilafat is proven from quran 😂

The sunnis can not represent their arguments on this topic so they hired a person voice who normally make videos on stoicim. Shame on all of you sunnis who can not defend their own fiqh and hired non muslim voice.

Gone in 12 minutes 😎🤣

Ayatoilets are sick

Weak response brother

His way of speaking is so annoying.