Response Surface Methodology Design of Experiments Analysis Explained Example using Minitab
www.theopeneducator.com/ / theopeneducator
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 43
@turbid1005 жыл бұрын
simple and quick. You rock
@amakaezeonuegbu10016 жыл бұрын
Nice one. Thank you
@rachitomer30105 жыл бұрын
how i incorporate qualitative factor instead of quantitative factor in full 3 factorial design using rsm??
@leventnergiz5 жыл бұрын
great educational video
@ruth19034 жыл бұрын
sir, if we coded our variables, how can i change into actual variables, the equation
@SadlySorrowful3 жыл бұрын
Can I ask if you can help me with plotting this contour plot? It shows blank for me
@bilgesayin18894 жыл бұрын
Very helpful! Thank you...
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
Check more here: www.theopeneducator.com/doe#TOC-Module-9.-Response-Surface-Methodology
@vijinjohnson33193 жыл бұрын
Nice one🙏
@preethymary9702 Жыл бұрын
Sir i have done the analysis in the same way for different data set. but analysis of variance table after error option the lack of fit option is missing sir. can you please help me sir
@nimmiperera89313 жыл бұрын
Can I know if the Lack of fit value is not shown in the results,, It showing star * ..What does it mean..how to explain
@kumararaja43302 жыл бұрын
Can anyone help how to download the minitab software
@CENTRALRAILWAYSRailfan4 жыл бұрын
Sir can we optimize more than one output at a time?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
Here you go: kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHiHycaHYafOqrw.html Thanks for watching.
@ThomasHaberkorn4 жыл бұрын
great video, but what about if you have 3 factors, does minitab show also a response surface here?
@itanndy
4 жыл бұрын
yes it does
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
You can check this out: kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHiHycaHYafOqrw.html
@foodtechnologist8382 ай бұрын
In the beginning when you select the Define response design nd then you selected the continuous factors, there is a option of coded and uncoded..what should I select? kindly help me because I am getting different results with coded and uncoded .
@nicoblijham4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video, I tried to reproduce this example in the trial version of minitab 19. The method is clear to me and I use exactly the same values (even for the axial points, I calculated them in Excel), however I get slightly different results. For example, my Adj SS for the model with 5 DF is 111.984 whereas yours is 109.077. Could this be an version issue, or some setting? Looking forward to your response!
@nicoblijham
4 жыл бұрын
Are the comfort values integers, or are these decimal values?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
@@nicoblijham It's not. They are integers.
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
Unlike ANOVA, regression sums of squares are a bit complicated. However, adjusted sum of square should be the same as long as you have the same model terms. You can send the Minitab file to email@theopeneducator.com . I can check it for you. I do have the Minitab 17 running. More on the response surface: www.theopeneducator.com/doe#TOC-Part-III:-Optimize-the-Important-Factors-Variables
@nicoblijham
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator Oké, I have sent you the file. Thanks in advance :)
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
@@nicoblijham The analyses were performed using Minitab 17-version. You may get different results with other versions of Minitab. You have done everything correctly. I have double checked. I have got exact same results as yours. My best!
@ajaykushwah67932 жыл бұрын
Sir it's a absolutely nice presentation. Sir I have a doubt, I have 4 factors and each having 3 levels, which rsm design I can use in btw Box beigan and CCD ?
@TheOpenEducator
2 жыл бұрын
I have some more materials on Response Surface here www.theopeneducator.com/doe/Response-Surface-Methodology. This should help answering your questions.
@sachin07214 жыл бұрын
which RSM you used Box-bhekan or CCD?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
CCD
@beenishbutt89792 жыл бұрын
hello I am doing some optimization study using RSM kindly help me to interpret my data.
@TheOpenEducator
2 жыл бұрын
Check more here: www.theopeneducator.com/doe & www.theopeneducator.com/doe/Response-Surface-Methodology
@aimeiwang8624 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot! I have learnt a lot from your website. Just come here to send a message. :)
@TheOpenEducator
Жыл бұрын
Great to hear!
@khoudranelamia22114 жыл бұрын
i got 96 percent yield , is there any way to increase it to 99 percent
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
need more information
@amitstorm5004 жыл бұрын
Can we use this method when factors are 5 and responses are 2 ?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
More on Response Surface: www.theopeneducator.com/doe#TOC-Module-9.-Response-Surface-Methodology . You can provide me with some more detail information on the design.
@amitstorm500
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator please send mail id
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
@@amitstorm500 email@theopeneducator.com
@amitstorm500
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator please check mail
@amitstorm500
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator sir any suggestions about my send information through mail
Пікірлер: 43
simple and quick. You rock
Nice one. Thank you
how i incorporate qualitative factor instead of quantitative factor in full 3 factorial design using rsm??
great educational video
sir, if we coded our variables, how can i change into actual variables, the equation
Can I ask if you can help me with plotting this contour plot? It shows blank for me
Very helpful! Thank you...
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
Check more here: www.theopeneducator.com/doe#TOC-Module-9.-Response-Surface-Methodology
Nice one🙏
Sir i have done the analysis in the same way for different data set. but analysis of variance table after error option the lack of fit option is missing sir. can you please help me sir
Can I know if the Lack of fit value is not shown in the results,, It showing star * ..What does it mean..how to explain
Can anyone help how to download the minitab software
Sir can we optimize more than one output at a time?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
Here you go: kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHiHycaHYafOqrw.html Thanks for watching.
great video, but what about if you have 3 factors, does minitab show also a response surface here?
@itanndy
4 жыл бұрын
yes it does
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
You can check this out: kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHiHycaHYafOqrw.html
In the beginning when you select the Define response design nd then you selected the continuous factors, there is a option of coded and uncoded..what should I select? kindly help me because I am getting different results with coded and uncoded .
Thanks for your video, I tried to reproduce this example in the trial version of minitab 19. The method is clear to me and I use exactly the same values (even for the axial points, I calculated them in Excel), however I get slightly different results. For example, my Adj SS for the model with 5 DF is 111.984 whereas yours is 109.077. Could this be an version issue, or some setting? Looking forward to your response!
@nicoblijham
4 жыл бұрын
Are the comfort values integers, or are these decimal values?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
@@nicoblijham It's not. They are integers.
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
Unlike ANOVA, regression sums of squares are a bit complicated. However, adjusted sum of square should be the same as long as you have the same model terms. You can send the Minitab file to email@theopeneducator.com . I can check it for you. I do have the Minitab 17 running. More on the response surface: www.theopeneducator.com/doe#TOC-Part-III:-Optimize-the-Important-Factors-Variables
@nicoblijham
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator Oké, I have sent you the file. Thanks in advance :)
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
@@nicoblijham The analyses were performed using Minitab 17-version. You may get different results with other versions of Minitab. You have done everything correctly. I have double checked. I have got exact same results as yours. My best!
Sir it's a absolutely nice presentation. Sir I have a doubt, I have 4 factors and each having 3 levels, which rsm design I can use in btw Box beigan and CCD ?
@TheOpenEducator
2 жыл бұрын
I have some more materials on Response Surface here www.theopeneducator.com/doe/Response-Surface-Methodology. This should help answering your questions.
which RSM you used Box-bhekan or CCD?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
CCD
hello I am doing some optimization study using RSM kindly help me to interpret my data.
@TheOpenEducator
2 жыл бұрын
Check more here: www.theopeneducator.com/doe & www.theopeneducator.com/doe/Response-Surface-Methodology
Thanks a lot! I have learnt a lot from your website. Just come here to send a message. :)
@TheOpenEducator
Жыл бұрын
Great to hear!
i got 96 percent yield , is there any way to increase it to 99 percent
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
need more information
Can we use this method when factors are 5 and responses are 2 ?
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
More on Response Surface: www.theopeneducator.com/doe#TOC-Module-9.-Response-Surface-Methodology . You can provide me with some more detail information on the design.
@amitstorm500
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator please send mail id
@TheOpenEducator
4 жыл бұрын
@@amitstorm500 email@theopeneducator.com
@amitstorm500
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator please check mail
@amitstorm500
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheOpenEducator sir any suggestions about my send information through mail