6:11 (this part of the video) the owner of this channel, the people who moderate this, the people who publish this. Please for the sake of Allah, if you do believe in Allah, which I believe you do, if you’ve said the shahada. Slandering and making up things and being a hypocrite is really not an Islamic or Muslim thing to do. You’ve mentioned that he (Sayed ammar Nakshawani) didn’t give context of the verses before and after. But he did, and he clearly spent like 20 mins explaining the verses before that verse 33 of Surah 33. Please don’t accuse someone for not including context and giving context, when you’ve done the exact same thing to Sayed Ammar here and given this part without context, cause he clearly did give context of the verses before verse 33 of Surah 33 (ahzab). If you’ve read this far, please rectify your video, and edit it, cause I as your brother in Islam don’t want you to be accountable to lies/ maybe misunderstanding on the day of judgement. Cause maybe you accidentally forgot about the context that Sayed ammar did give. jazakallah khair

@evervid9251

4 ай бұрын

You are right some of the argue is unconvincing and not logical

@asmztech8499

4 ай бұрын

this is what they do they cut and shorten it to the part where it seems no context was given... they pick up the portion where it was reached by a logical conclusion.. but without including the theory behind the conclusion veryy sad to see manipulations as such

@gjmichaelson3739

4 ай бұрын

You're mistaken brother. The Sunnah Discourse brother meant that Ammar Naskhwani didn't accepted the context. As per Ammar the context here does NOT matter which really does matter. The verse before and the verse after the verse of thatheer has no connection with the verse of thatheer. This is what Ammar is claiming. But the fact is the verse before and after انما یرید اللہ لیذھب عنکم ارجز till last does matter which proves that اہل بیتdoes include the RESPECTED wives of the holy prophet SAW. But unfortunately Shia are twisting the Quran and skipping the meaning of the context here. And the Ayatullah of the past used to say that the context does matter but they say that Quran has been distorted by the Sahaba to include the wives in Ahlul Bait which is ofcourse a false accusation.

@abumuhammad6978

4 ай бұрын

​​@@kazimsyed7367 Dude, you quoted hadith al-Kisa. What's the main point 12vers is trying to prove here?

Syed Ammar is really doing a great analysis 👌and most people are starting to realize a lot aspects in Islam that they didn't know there is video's coming out everyday for different topic on KZread @Imam Hussain TV & @Syed Ammar Nakshawani full videos can be found there

@iymuslim

4 ай бұрын

May Allah protect the Muslims from the filthy kufr and shirk of the rafidah

@LearnAuthority.Worldwide

4 ай бұрын

May Allah grant Syed the highest ranks of jannah. I’ve realised that all of their responses are either excuses, slanders or just blatant curses 😂

@Hariyapki

4 ай бұрын

@@LearnAuthority.Worldwide coming from the group of people that consistently slander the wife and the companions of the prophet? That’s rich

@ibrahimzulfiquar668

4 ай бұрын

​@@LearnAuthority.Worldwideyou're brainwashed

@flag_bearertruth6257

4 ай бұрын

may allah send u next to aisha, afsah, muwayoa, umar and abu baker, can any of them sniff jannah: no way@@iymuslim

This Ammar guy has provided more proof and was clearer ... brother responds with clarity and in order. Please stop editing the video with a child's voice or fast-forwarding it, it weakens your arguments.

SAN is knocking the house of cards down!! 😂😂😂😂

@ibrahimzulfiquar668

4 ай бұрын

He is knocking himself down with his embarassing tactics😂😂😂😂😂

@megalodon3655

4 ай бұрын

More like he’s is knocking himself down with you 😆🤣

@user-gb7uo6cc7k

3 ай бұрын

@@ibrahimzulfiquar668 no he’s wiping the floor of lies with pages from YOUR books 🤣🤣🤣

@user-gb7uo6cc7k

3 ай бұрын

@@megalodon3655 r u ok bro?

Alxamdulilah Allah will always have servants who will protect his deen, may allah bless us all.

@Fixes814

4 ай бұрын

6:11 (this part of the video) the owner of this channel, the people who moderate this, the people who publish this. Please for the sake of Allah, if you do believe in Allah, which I believe you do, if you’ve said the shahada. Slandering and making up things and being a hypocrite is really not an Islamic or Muslim thing to do. You’ve mentioned that he (Sayed ammar Nakshawani) didn’t give context of the verses before and after. But he did, and he clearly spent like 20 mins explaining the verses before that verse 33 of Surah 33. Please don’t accuse someone for not including context and giving context, when you’ve done the exact same thing to Sayed Ammar here and given this part without context, cause he clearly did give context of the verses before verse 33 of Surah 33 (ahzab). If you’ve read this far, please rectify your video, and edit it, cause I as your brother in Islam don’t want you to be accountable to lies/ maybe misunderstanding on the day of judgement. Cause maybe you accidentally forgot about the context that Sayed ammar did give. jazakallah khair

The house argument, the quran clearly says, your houses. Then the verse changes, it changes to people of the house, from buyuti to bayt, there is a difference. I think iam going to become shia. The arguments presented by sunnah discourse seem very weak. SAN has clearly come out with something. You guys seem to be scrambling for answers in every video

@osama.zohaib

17 күн бұрын

You're already a rafidhi pretending to be a Sunni. By your logic then Ali should be excluded since he was only his cousin not his brother! Wives are part of the family and belongs to their husband.

*Jazakallahu khairan kathira* ( _may Allah reward you greatly_) for refuting his exaggeration 🥰

He went through all the verses before that one...why didnt you go through that? He didnt jump to pronouns...pls watch it fully

@abumuhammad6978

4 ай бұрын

🤦‍♂️... you didn't really know the argument here, did you?

The speaker of this video is using semantics. The Shia do not claim the Quran is distorted. Neither did Sayyid Ammar say that. This is a weak response ..

@user-hi5xq7nx2y

4 ай бұрын

Even children have come to know that the Shiites say that the Qur’an is distorted, and they have 2,000 narrations that say this directly and indirectly.

@sakinahxo

4 ай бұрын

@@user-hi5xq7nx2y well maybe you all should stop misguiding your children with lies and slander on others Muslims it is haram.

@megalodon3655

4 ай бұрын

@@sakinahxoit’s not slander your own Shia scholars say this stop the taqqyia your scholars have admired this watch anti majos .

@rcmysm9123

4 ай бұрын

​@@megalodon3655 Are you still a child because otherwise there's no excuse for you.

@IbnAlahwaz

3 ай бұрын

7:35 check references

My Sunny brothers, please don't cheat on yourselves and make fun of your minds. By Allah, how can the wives of the Prophet (saw) be among Ahlulbayt - which have been purified - and at the same time the Quran tells us that two of the wives didn't keep the secret of the Prophet (saw) and that he has the choice to divorce them and that Allah will replace them with wives which are better than them?!

Your wrong mate if the Prophet was the only male included in the verse 33:33 the Arabic grammar would require the use of the dual form (referring to the Prophet and his wives) instead of the masculine plural. The use of the masculine plural suggests that there are multiple male individuals included in the Ahl al-Bayt mentioned in this verse. Further this hadith proves that the plural has chnaged and the ayat refers to specific individuals and not the wives. The verse "Allah only wishes to remove the Rijs from you, O members of the family, and to purify you with a thorough purification" was revealed to the Prophet in the house of Umm Salama. Upon that, the Prophet called Fatimah, Hasan, and Husain, and covered them with a cloak, and he also called `Ali and covered him with a cloak as well. Then he said: "O Allah! These are the people of my house, so remove the Rijs from them and purify them with a thorough purification." Umm Salama said: "Am I also included with them, O Messenger of Allah?" The Prophet replied: "You remain in your position, and you are on the right." (Sahih Muslim, Book 31, Hadith 30)

Does anyone else understood what points he was trying to make? Because it sounded nonsense and lost to me. Brother if you want to rebuttal SAN episodes then go on discuss the same Narration from SAB and SAM and other prominent book that he talked on his episodes don't waste our time and instead go on an familiarize yourself with your books before coming out and rebuttal him.

Shiaism is a parallel religion to Islam. The earlier we “both shias and Muslims” realise it the better it is for all of us.

Yeaaa sunnah discourse comingg backk may Allah bless you all and may Allah keep us all steadfast on the religion of Allah swt

The wives are 100% not included in Ahlulbayt its not even debatable the verse is mentioned in your Sahih hadith no wife was under the cloak of purification further more when the Prophet said i leave behind for you the Quran and my Ahlulbayt the hadith clearly even asks the question are the wives included to which one of the companions responds the wives are not included because they can be divorced. I dont know how much more clear it can be that Ahlulbayt is the selected blood family of the Prophet. But anyway we have our religion and you have yours. Allah Guides. Respect to All the Muslim brothers. Be it shia or Sunni.

@discoveringtruth594

4 ай бұрын

You make a false argument, your logic that wives can be divorced therefore they are not part of the family is a failure because if wives are not divorced then they are part of the family. Ask your father if your mother is part of his family if you are in doubt. Furthermore, the Quran clearly states that the wives of the prophets are mothers of the believers. I'm sure you know that denying clear verses takes a person outside of Islam.

@Azm1919

4 ай бұрын

They are our mothers to make it clear we can never marry them. Again go to your hadith the wives are not included in the Ahlulbayt they are part of the family of course but they are not the selected Ahlulbayt. That is reserved to only the decedents of the Prophet. It is clear in the Quran and clear in your books through Hadith al Kisa and the Prophets sermon at Gahdeer Khum…all in Sahih Muslim btw. Furthermore according to Sahih Muslim the hadith makes perfect sense the wives are not included in Ahlulbayt because they can be divorced its clear if you have common sense if you marry someone of course she will always be the mother of your children but is she still part of your household? Most definitely not. But your children your blood are forever apart of you no matter what. Sahih Muslim 2408: O people, I am a human being. I am about to receive a messenger (the angel of death) from my Lord and I, in response to Allah's call, (would bid good-bye to you), but I am leaving among you two weighty things: the one being the Book of Allah in which there is right guidance and light, so hold fast to the Book of Allah and adhere to it. He exhorted (us) (to hold fast) to the Book of Allah and then said: The second are the members of my household I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family. He (Husain) said to Zaid: Who are the members of his household? Aren't his wives the members of his family? Thereupon he said: His wives are the members of his family (but here) the members of his family are those for whom acceptance of Zakat is forbidden. And he said: Who are they? Thereupon he said: 'Ali and the offspring of 'Ali, 'Aqil and the offspring of 'Aqil and the offspring of Ja'far and the offspring of 'Abbas. Husain said: These are those for whom the acceptance of Zakat is forbidden. Zaid said: Yes. …again clear cut wives are members of the family but Prophet did not tell you to hold on to them he told you to hold on to his offspring which you do not. Always being told follow the Quran and Sunnah.

@kledmohd4230

4 ай бұрын

​​​@@Azm1919you are simply picking from the sunni sources that pleases you. The same sunni sources you so love to quote also mentions that Aisha and her father were among the most beloved to the prophet pbuh. Also there are hadiths mentioned ppl promised paradise while still on earth and it includes Umar and Abu bakr ra. So your game is, if hadiths matches what you like, you will take it, and if you don't it means the Sahabas who narrated it lied. Either you believe sunni sources to be authoritative then you need to accept all of it, and if you think they lied, then you can't use any of it even if it pleases you and your understanding as they must've lied then as well.

@discoveringtruth594

4 ай бұрын

@Azm You are wandering off in wonderland with the other shias, with all due respect. Let's bring it back to the context. Aysha was the prophet's (S) wife until his death, thus the matter is concluded. What are you talking about if she is divorced? "Selected" ahlul bayt? Where are you getting this concept from? What is that? Ghadeer khum? Lol. Do you want to know other hadeeths (saheeh) too and see how they bring the meaning and put into context that hadeeth? Such as Abu bakr being put as the imam of the congressional prayer by the prophet (S) because he was sick and whilst Ali was present? You know where the logic goes from that right and many other hadiths also. Ali is not a descendant of the prophet (S) nor are women put as leaders for mankind as stated by the prophet (S). There is nothing in your logic that dictates his superiority over very close companions which is proven factually and historically which you distort. It is not for you to say who is entitled what position. Learn objectively and think outside the box.

@discoveringtruth594

4 ай бұрын

@Karim what are you waffling about? For diplomatic reasons? Where did you get that from?

Standard video from you guys Cutting the clips - making fun of the Sayed - not replying to the arguments themselves

@abumuhammad6978

4 ай бұрын

Anybody can make such a generic comment. It's cheap. Be specific for your claim.

@HusseinAli-ik6em

4 ай бұрын

@@abumuhammad6978ok brother Open your mind and go watch Sayed Ammars video in full, then return to this, maybe you'll then see

@HusseinAli-ik6em

3 ай бұрын

​@@abumuhammad6978cool He cut out the clear ahadeeth of tafseer that point to the Ahlulbayt ALONE in the verse such as in muslim and Tirmidhi where he prevented al Sayeda Um Salama from entering the Cloak. Very convenient because that proves everything in this video wrong Of course this son of abu bakr is a liar just like his grand dad :)

Is it possible to tell us where u got the video of kamal haydari akhi barakallahfeekum

Bro why u hiding the half belief of sheikh saduq rahimauallah and he believe and every shia believe Rasool saw can forget by will of Allah and it still doesn’t contradict the belief of infallibility cz something done by will of Allah isn’t mistake 😂

@inityo

4 ай бұрын

Terrible argument he made hahaha

There is a difference between not sinning and not forgetting. Sayed Ammar was only speaking about the Infallibility of the AhlulBayt and never mentioned Sahw

We need shaykh anwar on the channel more allahuma barik hes well spoken

@ali.al.farisi

4 ай бұрын

Is ur name milad by any chance?

But wait... what is YQ thumbnail doing here?

This is a response? I think you clearly lost this one bro. Also, topic was Aisha and Hafsa's transgression, not even touched upon. Listened to both of your vids (technically 2 of SAN's vids). He's clearly got the upper hand in knowledge and proofs. Maybe it might be a good idea to spend some more time and research and try and refute him intellectually and contextually, preferably with source material not random 'sheikhs' yelling nonsense.

@alifrahman5430

4 ай бұрын

What transgression. Does nakshwani said that aisha and hafsa are not part of tatheer verse because they transgress. If that is true then his imams are not in that verse either. In shia narrative imams use to lie to their followers for asking minor fiqh issues. That is greater than what aisha nad hafsa did.

5:18 - you say atteibuting full perfection to the imams. Yes 33:33 where Allah swt purified them with a perfect purification. Free from sin. Imagine you have a representative of Allah swt who commits.sin or forgets versus kf quran and his sahabis have to remind him of versus. What a joke

Ma Cha Allah

Keep the vids coming. JazakAllahu khairan

Assalaamu alaykum brother, long time no see! I hope you're doing well.

Is this your best rebuttal wow what a joke

love sunnah discourse ❤❤❤

who is the last reciter?

What happened to Hani (May Allah guide him)? Who runs this channel now?

Please respond to his videos I used to be Shia I became Sunni I’m trying to convert my brothers but they keep showing me these videos sayed amar is making during this Ramadan

@user-gb7uo6cc7k

4 ай бұрын

They’re helping u give ur head a wobble m8!

@iMan-610

4 ай бұрын

Farid Responds have responsed to lies of Nakshiwani

@Mariana77-tn4cw

4 ай бұрын

what made you sunni

@JN-eq3gl

4 ай бұрын

If you like your sanity go back to Quran and Ahlulbait.

@discoveringtruth594

4 ай бұрын

@JN But you don't follow the Quran, the nabi (sallaAllahu alayhi wa sallam) it was revealed to nor his family and companions. All of these are necessary components for a preserved Islam in its entirety which is what the Sunnis are upon with evidence and reason. It is no wonder your scholars say the Quran is missing verses, a claim among other claims with no basis. Furthermore who were the spreaders of the Quran? Did you not know who were the rulers in power after the prophet (S) in fact in history? Ahlul bayt are a small number, while the rest were the majority and had the real influence in spreading Islam. In other words there is no Islam without them, and your Islam is some deviation from the truth that has no authentic link back to the prophet (S).

Thank you May Allah reward you

Very nice

SAN is making you cry haha

@ibrahimzulfiquar668

4 ай бұрын

Farid Responds and Sunnah discourse destroying ur ammar like a piece of crap😂😂😂😂

they made a lot of videos on their channel, in sha Allah yall can respond to them

@JN-eq3gl

4 ай бұрын

They can't. They can only respond with falsehood

@asmaarmehmood

4 ай бұрын

actually it has been respoded like 1000 times@@JN-eq3gl

@asmaarmehmood

4 ай бұрын

actually it has been respoded like 1000 times@@AspirateurMagnifique

@asmaarmehmood

4 ай бұрын

@@AspirateurMagnifique doesnt look lke it

@mustaphahashimgital6822

4 ай бұрын

Respond with what? 😂😂😂😂 He obviously can't...Falsehood upon Falsehood

I see why SAN does not want to debate with you guys. You can only distort and misguide people. If you want to know what the shia believe then go watch for yourself and judge.

@Saifullah-cu6us

4 ай бұрын

What u waffling about. Show me a single thing Anwar distorted about Ur beliefs.

@JN-eq3gl

4 ай бұрын

Go watch the full video and all the remaining videos in his Ramadan series. Your Sunni belief will collapse. And you will wander in darkness due to stubbornness of not accepting the Shia belief. Then if you are inshallah guided, you will accept at the end.

@sameerwasim4187

4 ай бұрын

Yeah This Claims Shia Are making For So Long And Still Unseccesful About I am An Ex Shia Myself I Just Don't Get How You Get This Guy Ammar He Is A Comedian with Things Doesn't Exist Like Ashura Meaning 10 of Every Month Seriously What Level Of Ignorance He Has And You Guys Act Tough For No Reason.​@@JN-eq3gl

@CoYg6942

4 ай бұрын

@@JN-eq3gl why the hell would anyone accept the religion where the main premise is to hurt oneself, play in the mud, worship false idols and curse every single sahaba because they arent prophets sws family

@Dripster2

4 ай бұрын

Actually you have to put your brain aside to be shia😂😂 no reasoning

15:49 and onwards 💔😭💔😭💔😭💔😭💔

I honestly have no idea why this channel doesn't have a debate with hasan allahyari upon those issues perhaps he might clear them and perhaps he may not. Anyway, I'm just saying that it may be interesting

@gjmichaelson3739

4 ай бұрын

This channel does have so many debates with Hassan Allahyari and he always took the narrow escape with speed of light. I'm not an Alim but I swear that I can beat Hassan Allahyari and so many others son of bitches like him. There are so many verses which completely goes against the Shia religion. Ignorant people and mostly youth are impressed from him cuz he shows his fake batil references in his batil shia books... Brother Ahlu Sunnah is the Islam which is transferred directly from the Prophet to the Shaba and the rest of the Umma.

SALAM BROTHER THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD SAAWAWS SAID THERE ARE 12 IMAMS AFTER ME 12 KHULAFAH AFTER ME PLEASE CAN YOU TELL ME THE NAMES OF THE 12 SO I CAN TELL THE SHIAS OF THE 12 THE PROPHET PBUH WAS REFERRING TO ? THANK YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN JAZAK ALLAAH SALAM

@IbnAlahwaz

4 ай бұрын

Did the Shia ever knew about number 12 to begin with.. before the Mahdi disappears 👀 😮

@Random_username_1234

4 ай бұрын

They made a vidéo on their channel wich i think is called ''12 imams in suni books'' where they explain this

@user-ek8fu6mv4j

4 ай бұрын

NO I NEED TO KNOW WHICH 12 PEOPLE MUHAMMAD SAAWAWS WAS SPEAKING OF WE SHOULD KNOW WHO THEY ARE ITS A SUNNAH TO OBEY AND FOLLOW THEM WHO ARE THEY IN AHLUS SUNNAAH

@JN-eq3gl

4 ай бұрын

It is in the bible as Allah has promised Prophet Ibrahim (AS) that there will be 12 princes in islam. Our Sunni brothers know nothing of this

@JN-eq3gl

4 ай бұрын

@@IbnAlahwaz yes it is a hadith🗿

shoutout to the Shias fasting ramadan with the Muslims to show they stand with us shias u need to be muslim for ur fasting to count btw

@gr3en_jamfatima295

4 ай бұрын

you forgot to use your brain when you wrote this

My brothers, I find that debating and discussing English and Persian speakers who do not know the Arabic language is very difficult to convince them, but when translating dialogues of common Arab Shiites who discuss Muslim preachers and then return to the correct message of Islam as it was al bayt Prophet Muhammad pbuh It is the best way to understand true Islam, and I see many Arab Shiites returning to Islam through dialogue with Muslim preachers such as: Rami Issa, Sheikh Farraj Al-Suhaibi, Ashraf Gharib, Walid Ismail, Sheikh Othman Al-Khamis, etc. It is also interested in translating books criticizing the Shiites and writing books criticizing the Shiite religion that will help non-Arab Shiites understand that the Shiite religion is different from the religion of Islam in an easy-to-understand manner. Non-Arabs can verify and confirm that what the book says is true. I heard that the most important books are the book The Fundamentals of the Twelver Shiite Doctrine by the author Nasser al-Qaqari, and the book Minhaj al-Sunnah by Ibn Taymiyyah.

Your statement at 3:01 - fix up, finish the full defence and then switch topics; don't just switch topics.

I don't understand why put sheikh Yasir Qadhi on the thumbnail??

Salaam brother, why are you changing his voice like cartoon? Be professional... let it be as it is... so everyone can hear his full argument and your argument... you are cut and pasting...

Bro the Sunni guys shouldn’t be making videos if they don’t know how to refute cause it really makes them look super weak, why are you referencing scholars stick to the hadiths

@rcmysm9123

4 ай бұрын

Allah swt. knows best!

Genuine question to the Shia, do you guys not contemplate on the blasphemy of the concept of Ma'sumeen, as per the modern day Twelver interpretation?

Is Allah limitless?

If all the wives are pure and they are masoom please also tell us that why Quran mentioned that two of the prophet’s wives Namely Ayesha and Hafsa went against the prophet and they conspired against him. If you need references from the sunni books for this event please feel free to get in touch.

@altamashbaibars9477

4 ай бұрын

Doing mistakes doesn't mean they become impure. Quran speaks about mistakes of prophets that doesn't make them impure. Your imams made many mistakes it doesn't make them impure But yes no one is infallible not even prophets only Allah is infallible.

@Dripster2

4 ай бұрын

Like what the hell are you talking about no one said masoom , you guys just can not accept

@asadabbas8844

4 ай бұрын

According to my readings and teachings Hazrat Mohammad PBUH and his family are infallible. You can disagree on it but this is with proof and from your own books 😊

@asadabbas8844

4 ай бұрын

Also please read the translation of hadith al kissa and the verse of purification. The event of the cloak is mentioned in your books.

@asadabbas8844

4 ай бұрын

There are reasons we dont revere all wives of prophet (PBUH and his family) as some of them were disobedient to the Prophet(PBUH and his family) and the words of Quran were literally saying to divorce them if they want dunya. Also reason why we dont revere the first three Khalifa as they did things to hurt prophet and his family. This can be proved from your own books i am not going to reference any shia books. Umar literally denied the pen and paper to the prophet on his death bed and called him delusional and delirious.(Nawzobillah) If you want to respect someone who disrespects prophet(PBUH and his family) please do so. Everyone needs to answer on the day of judgement

There's something seriously wrong with you and this whole channel. And I'm Sunni. You got your priorities all wrong. Options - don't recommend channel

8:22 The worst of created beings in the Sight of God are the deaf and the dumb, those who do not use their intellect. Inna sharrad dawaaabbi 'indal laahis summul bukmul lazeena laa ya'qiloon NO FRIDAY KHUTBA "Quran itself is the explanation and above all, God’s preemptive use of the very same terms the sectarians use for their sources as a warning. God describes the Quran as the “Best Hadith” Quran 39:23 and the “Best Tafsir” Quran 25:33 Let us not settle for less than the best that God has to offer.This whole sectarian mess can be traced to the curse of “different interpretations” notion. Quran cannot be interpreted differently if one were to stick to the Quranic guidelines of how to interpret the verses of the Quran found in the Quran itself.Islam is the ultimate do it yourself religion both on an individual level and community level. Islam is definitely not based on “reviews” of others, it is all about research and understanding of God’s words directly, using the God-given faculties of observation, reason, and logic. Failing to do so opens the possibility of being declared less than cattle by God Himself.Unlike the third parties review methodology, the reason and logic methodology have a huge advantage; besides the only methodology sanctioned in the Quran itself (in fact, detailed foolproof guidelines of interpretation of the Quran are embedded in the Quran as one would expect from a Divine message) anybody, Muslim or non-Muslim who uses these embedded guidelines will arrive at the same conclusion unless one breaks the established rules of logic, sound research, and rational thought.Since man has a forgetful nature, a few reminders." "Add to it the strange omission of the Friday Sermons and we are left with gaps that no God-fearing thinking person can ignore. While the Friday sermon is ubiquitous in the Muslim world today, it may come as a shock to many that out of an estimated thousand or so sermons reportedly delivered by the messenger of God, not a single sermon was committed to memory by any of the thousands of attendees and passed on. Given the scale and reach of these supposedly regular sermons, it is more than strange that the famed memory champions of the time could not manage a single complete sermon so that it could make it into any of the popular collections.These Friday sermons were the perfect opportunities for the recording of mutawatir reports, as the Quran demands. So if we ere to go with the famed memory champions narrative then it is not at all unreasonable to imagine that they were systematically pruned from all collections. The question is why?" "T ISLAMIC DAYS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE LIKE THIS [1-] (Yaum) al-Aḥad الأحد (first day)[2-] (Yaum) al-Ithnayn الإثنين (second day)[3-] (Yaum) ath-Thalaathaaʼ الثلاثاء (third day) [4-] (Yaum) al-Arba‘aa’ الأربعاء (fourth day)5- (Yaum) al-Khamīs الخميس (fifth day) [6-] (Yaum) al-Sittah السته (Sixth day) [7-] (Yaum) al-Sab’a سبعة (seventh day) BUT THEY CHANGED IT TO [6-] (Yaum) al-Jumu‘ah الجمعة (Friday) ??? Most Muslims Don’t Really Believe That the Quran Is the Word of God There are thirty distinct whole numbers that are mentioned in the Qur’an: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, [11], 12, [19], 20, 30, 40, [50], [60], 70, [80], [99], 100, 200, [300], 1000, [2000], [3000], [5000], [50000] and [100000]. The numbers that are inside the bracket in the list occur only once. The eight distinct fractions used in the Qur’an are 1/10, 1/8, 1/6, 1/5, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2 and 2/3, some of which occur more than once. No [2and1/2 %]-But why ?????? "TRUTH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IT CONVINCES" Paul Claudel

In the last portion of the video the recitation of the Holy Quran made me cry. So much ❤ touching. Unfortunately Shia are deprived from such sweet recitation due to their wrong and filthy beliefs about the distortion of the Holy Quran. نعوذ باللہ من ذٰلک

@yourmomshouse8993

4 ай бұрын

Ya Ali madad

@gjmichaelson3739

4 ай бұрын

@@yourmomshouse8993 وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيرًا مِّنَ الْجِنِّ وَالإِنسِ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لاَّ يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لاَّ يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ آذَانٌ لاَّ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا أُوْلَئِكَ كَالأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ اور ہم نے جنات اور انسانوں میں سے بہت سے لوگ جہنم کیلئے پیدا کئے۔ اُن کے پاس دل ہیں جن سے وہ سمجھتے نہیں ، اُن کے پاس آنکھیں ہیں جن سے وہ دیکھتے نہیں، اور اُن کے پاس کان ہیں جن سے وہ سنتے نہیں ۔ وہ لو گ چوپایوں کی طرح ہیں ، بلکہ وہ اُن سے بھی زیادہ بھٹکے ہوئے ہیں ۔ یہی لوگ ہیں جو غفلت میں پڑے ہوئے ہیں

@gjmichaelson3739

4 ай бұрын

@@yourmomshouse8993 وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيرًا مِّنَ الْجِنِّ وَالإِنسِ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لاَّ يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لاَّ يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ آذَانٌ لاَّ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا أُوْلَئِكَ كَالأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُون

@gjmichaelson3739

4 ай бұрын

​@@yourmomshouse8993 یا اللہ مدد

it’s embersssing you’re refutations are making more people shia, these are the worse responses i have ever watched. The whole entire time, you insult the individual and mock him rather than refuting. Changing his voice editing and making jokes to make ur religion make sense. 😂

lmao the comments being brigaded shia trying to portray themselves as sunni 😂

@roneddy

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 True Islam of beating yourself up and diving head first into mud pits and doing shirk. Okay 🤡

@TheIntrepid-tz4zo

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123sometimes it’s good to not live in delusions.

@megalodon3655

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 says the Ali worshiper

@TheIntrepid-tz4zo

4 ай бұрын

@@RUNESCAPER123 you do not follow the true islam you follow the jewish fabrications. You are nowhere close to islam. You have innovated islam. You have modified the madhab in your own ways and called it islam nauzbillah. May Allah protect islam from the hands of you jahils.

😭😭😭bhai is this the best you can do? Seriously????? Being a open minded liberal sect free muslim this do not proves INFALLIBILITY of imams is a lie or Wives are Ahlebait 😭 literally nothing

This kind of Shia'a feels like the police or a judge who only practice the law on dead people 🤣🤣🤣, may Allah guide us all to the truth

Pathetic ! From Cameroon...

Please refute kuffar rafiza like this,Allah swt bless you

@Mariana77-tn4cw

4 ай бұрын

jahil! who are you to say kuffar to them

Sheikh your respond is not satisfying

VERY weak response im sorry. Salaam.

😂😂😂😂 you lot are digging just accept the truth

@Dripster2

4 ай бұрын

Haha its him ammar like anybody who got a brain can easily see what it really means 😂😂

@abumuhammad6978

4 ай бұрын

Accept what truth? Is it about not even a single clearest ayatul Quran about the believe in the imamah of Twelver Shia found in the book of Allah? If that one, it's 100% true... 😃

@omer1340

4 ай бұрын

​@@Dripster2 coming from the same ones who do the greatest copes to make Hadith Al ghadir mean friend.

Shi'as crying in the comments 😂

You know what the problem is with the islamic world! We dont have a true caliph anymore. We are secular now. The prophet Mohammad warned for it! How can one claim to be on the right path if we have so many groups shia sunni and all their different schools of thoughts....

@rcmysm9123

4 ай бұрын

We have Imam Mahdi (as).

@TheIntrepid-tz4zo

4 ай бұрын

Literally my point.

@Angelo-Rules

2 ай бұрын

@@TheIntrepid-tz4zo Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other? Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]? Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran? If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] The difference between Sunni and Shia is that our scholars unanimously agree that the Quran is not distorted you can use as many weak hadith as you want. You won't hear any ridiculous scholars and personalities of Sunni Islam mouthing off these ridiculous things like Shias do despite the Shias being only 10% and Sunnis being majority. You'd think since there are more Sunnis you'd find more ridiculous claims like this coming from Sunnis but it is opposite. For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9 Any sunni who believes that a part of Qur'an has been lost due to goats eating it or men changing it, is a kafir. There is no difference of opinion on this in sunni Islam. No buts no ifs. Your misunderstanding does not change our stance. Aisha (ra) did not believe in tahreef. Stop putting your own view on the hadith. You are just seeing what you want to see. It wouldn't have mattered if goats ate it because people memorise the Qur'an. What you're basically going to find is that this will likely lead into the topic of abrogation and abrogation was completed whilst the Prophet (pbuh) was alive. Islamqa covers this very well. Shias might attempt to steal the chains in the Sunni books and attribute them to themselves, which is pathetic and shows the weakness of their way. `Asim bin abi al-Nujoud, Hafs bin Sulayman and Hamzah al-Zayyat are all great Imams of Ahlul-Sunnah, the Twelvers cannot prove that they were Rafidhi imami Shia neither through their books or ours. If they were to prove that they were Shia, the Shia of the time were Sunni in their worship, and even if they try their best to prove that they were Rafidhah, then even the Imamiyyah at the time had different sects all of them enemies who make Takfeer on each-other. By consensus`Asim and Hafs are two great Imams of Qira’at. The weakness attributed to Hafs is in regards to his skills as narrator, and the accusation of him being a liar is a baseless exaggeration. And if true still doesn’t strengthen Shia’s view. The rules for the authentication of a narrator in a Hadithi chain are different than the rules for the authentication of a Qur’ani recitation. Hundreds of narrations from their infallibles prove that the followers of Ibn Saba claim distortion, and the statement that the chains of transmission of these narrations are weak cannot be accepted for reasons such as: First: The Shiites do not consider the chains of transmission and their lim il rijjal (hadeeth sciences) is very inconsistent ( Second: The narrations of distortion are abundant (mutawatir) according to them, and if this were the case, their chain of transmission should not be of concern Third: There are Shiite scholars who authenticated the chains of narrations of Hadiths regarding distortion Fourth: Whoever rejects the many narrations about distortion, which amount to nearly two thousand narrations, is obligated to reject the narrations of the Imamate and the narrations of the rajah, the bidaa, and the infallibility, because as their their scholar, Yusuf Al-Bahrani, said: If these narrations aren’t accepted (i.e. the narrations of distortion), despite their abundance and spread, it would be possible to reject to the other narrations related to the religion, since the principles are one, as are the chains, narrators, sheikhs, and transmission. The narrations of distortion that the Shiites have are narrated from the twelve imams who believe in their infallibility, while all those who narrate the absence of distortion from him are the scholars, not the imams. They do not narrate from the imams, and not a single narration says that there is no distortion. Rather, they transmit two thousand narrations from the imams that say there is distortion, and those from whom they quote that there is no distortion are scholars who can aren’t infallible. As for the infallible ones, they quoted from them the statement of distortion, so the Shiites are required to take the words of the infallible ones and not the words of others. Nimat Allah Al-Jazairi said: The narrations that indicate distortion exceed two thousand hadiths. Then he said: He did not come across a single hadith that said otherwise. Yusuf Al-Bahrani said: However, there is no opposition to this narration, as I know, other than a mere claim that is devoid of evidence and does not go beyond mere gossip. All shias should either follow their infallibles or leave this evil religion

There’s a reason why you didn’t address Hadith Kisa lol. You also used the analogy of Imam Al-Hassan [AS] and his wives but it didn’t make any sense. Why? Because every wife has their own house regardless to if they’re all in their husband’s house and the Syed did admit that the wives are part of the household in terms of them being wives but not part of the household that has been blessed. Regarding to the scholars of the Shia that you mentioned and the Hadith of the Shia, there is a precaution of generalising the whole Shia population and if possible send the links to all the sources u brang possible. (In my opinion, if you addressed Hadith Kisa, then this would’ve been a complete video). All respect to u tho for being respectful.

@yourmomshouse8993

4 ай бұрын

Did you notice he made a video and said nothing. Sayed is making a 1 hour video destroying their entire belief system and they have no response but this? Lol 😂

@LearnAuthority.Worldwide

4 ай бұрын

@@yourmomshouse8993 exactly akhi, all of their replies have either been excuses, slanders or curses 😂😂

@LearnAuthority.Worldwide

4 ай бұрын

@@kazimsyed7367 ahsant

@user-hi5xq7nx2y

4 ай бұрын

Shia worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦‍♂️🤣

@ibrahimzulfiquar668

4 ай бұрын

​@@yourmomshouse8993destroying whose belief?😂😂😂only idiots will fall for Shia bullshit

in the month of ramadan, instead of contemplating on the qalam of Allah swt, the Rafidhi started accusing women whom allah swt himself cleared of any accusations. May Allah swt never guide that qafir. Sheikh why do you call this tattooed majoosi grifter "sayed" ?

@yourmomshouse8993

4 ай бұрын

He lives rent free in your head because you know he is right. Ayesha (la) is the daughter of the man who stole saqifa. Inshallah her and daddy are where they belong.

@TheIntrepid-tz4zo

4 ай бұрын

Exactly and people are listening to this in Ramadhan this tattooed dude is earning sins in ramadhan and involving other Muslims too.