Reduction of Order, Basic Example

Thanks to all of you who support me on Patreon. You da real mvps! $1 per month helps!! :) / patrickjmt !! Reduction of Order, Basic Example. Here i use Reduction of Order to find a second solution and the general solution of a differential equation given one known solution.

Пікірлер: 217

  • @msjahun
    @msjahun8 жыл бұрын

    Real heroes don't wear capes, real heroes tech you Differential equations.

  • @4chance610

    @4chance610

    6 жыл бұрын

    Grammar is optional?

  • @Twothron3

    @Twothron3

    6 жыл бұрын

    i think im dizzy after watching this :P

  • @cmprice11

    @cmprice11

    6 жыл бұрын

    i lov teching studens maths

  • @joelu3691

    @joelu3691

    5 жыл бұрын

    this dude literally teaches everything in mechanical engineering

  • @benjamincalloway
    @benjamincalloway4 жыл бұрын

    Reads book: *thonking* Attends lecture: *visible confusion* Watches patrick: R E V E L A T I O N

  • @patrickjmt

    @patrickjmt

    4 жыл бұрын

    you are too kind :)

  • @mexicanwootwoot

    @mexicanwootwoot

    4 жыл бұрын

    Invest in Stonks.

  • @holopleasures4011

    @holopleasures4011

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sometimes it is just seeing the same thing multiple times from multiple perspectives.

  • @chandlerinman4393
    @chandlerinman43938 жыл бұрын

    From High School Algebra 2 to College Diff EQ, you're always there. Thanks for all your help! I wonder if you have any videos related to Real Analysis.

  • @patrickjmt

    @patrickjmt

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Chandler “Thunder99879” Inman not many

  • @hemantslift

    @hemantslift

    11 ай бұрын

    Heyyy

  • @JordanBl
    @JordanBl7 жыл бұрын

    And here, ladies and gentlemen, we have a man saving the day from almost four years in the past.

  • @BasketOFmuffins
    @BasketOFmuffins7 жыл бұрын

    You know math is difficult when you understand every method and then you get to the test and draw a blank. And for that reason, I know for sure that Patrick is gifted.

  • @eves.9
    @eves.94 жыл бұрын

    I am literally crying tears of joy. Thank you for all you do. You are the reason I will pass this class. Not having in-person lectures during the quarantine means my professor is sending us bad videos which I can't understand as well as your videos.

  • @patrickjmt

    @patrickjmt

    4 жыл бұрын

    tell her/him to send mine as well :) glad i could help!

  • @vidgami46
    @vidgami4610 жыл бұрын

    You make this sound so much simpler than my Engineering Analysis professor does, and you don't just copy from a textbook! Thanks for what you do.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын

    i like all of it :) i like the beauty of pure math and i also like being able to actually use it for something as well!

  • @JButlerEsj
    @JButlerEsj9 жыл бұрын

    woww those 'v's look like square root signs, great video regardless

  • @missempoi1976

    @missempoi1976

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Richard Butler yeah, at first im a little bit confused. O.o

  • @jazzm5557

    @jazzm5557

    7 жыл бұрын

    Richard Butler ahhh damn, once seen can never be unseen D: 😂

  • @tomoguitaro

    @tomoguitaro

    4 жыл бұрын

    I hear v but see sqrt

  • @InquiringJoe
    @InquiringJoe9 жыл бұрын

    Great video. It should be in the Differential Equations Playlist.

  • @electronicjunky6940
    @electronicjunky69407 жыл бұрын

    its amazing how much easier it is to understand you , than my text book on this subject. Great Job!

  • @sediye
    @sediye10 жыл бұрын

    life saver, you deserve a Nobel prize

  • @shoskq7206
    @shoskq72066 жыл бұрын

    You taugh me in 12 min what my lecturer has been trying to teach up in 4 days thank you!!!!!

  • @abdulhalimaslanacier3847
    @abdulhalimaslanacier38476 жыл бұрын

    Having seen this, no need to disrupt my sleep for a lecture in the morning anymore :)

  • @sreeharimadhu6885
    @sreeharimadhu68854 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much sir. I was feeling nervous about my maths exam now I am feeling much more confident after learning the concept through your video.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын

    it did not seem as though people were that interested - more people keep asking for differential equations so i figured i would start making these. i often jump from topic to topic ;)

  • @oninsfirred
    @oninsfirred10 жыл бұрын

    Hello Patrick, What if there is no given solution on that differential equation? how do you formulate y=vy1?

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын

    i dont really understand your question. w(x) = v ' (x). so, w ' (x) would equal v ''(x). i am not sure why you would need to product rule, or chain rule, or anything else.

  • @xinyun5215
    @xinyun52155 жыл бұрын

    Engineering Math 2, still here. Love you.

  • 5 жыл бұрын

    you definitely helped me understand this concept and how to start on this. Thank you

  • @colinward774
    @colinward7749 жыл бұрын

    why even go to class when these exist?

  • @sbk1398

    @sbk1398

    7 жыл бұрын

    You don't :)

  • @ev4662

    @ev4662

    6 жыл бұрын

    pop quizzes 😥

  • @6subswith0vids80

    @6subswith0vids80

    5 жыл бұрын

    Fugging attendance ):

  • @dtm876
    @dtm87610 жыл бұрын

    i'm astounded as to how you make this sound so simple. i'm really grateful. thanks.

  • @rebelgamer
    @rebelgamer11 жыл бұрын

    The fact that you published this video today is astonishing. I have a math midterm that includes RoO in a few hours.

  • @redballs
    @redballs5 жыл бұрын

    I have an exam on Wednesday. Thank you for the crystal clear explanation.

  • @kayshin1237
    @kayshin12377 жыл бұрын

    Patrick JMT is the God of Math. I seriously can't do anything without him.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын

    v is a function of x. v' is also a function of x. if i let w = v' , you still have a function of x, you are just renaming. for example: let v(x) = sinx. so v' = cos(x). if i let w = v' , then w = cos(x) which is still just a function of x. v is a not a variable.

  • @iloveitgirlandR5
    @iloveitgirlandR55 жыл бұрын

    When should you use this method? like for a 1st 2nd order or a linear non linear equation? thanks for the video, great help.

  • @xelvince
    @xelvince2 жыл бұрын

    Eternal Value. Thank you PatrickJMT.

  • @aizazhashmi9433
    @aizazhashmi94336 жыл бұрын

    great method of teaching...you eliminated all my confusion...thanks

  • @Sam-kc5np
    @Sam-kc5np10 жыл бұрын

    Insightful. Thorough and detailed. Good shit!

  • @robjones2525
    @robjones25258 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the video! Some advice (take it or leave it)... Elaborate more on when to use reduction of order and why we would even want to use it in the first place. I felt like we rushed into an example. I feel like after watching this video I learned a technique but have only a slight idea of when to apply it.

  • @notadeity
    @notadeity9 жыл бұрын

    "Basic". Nice work, your explanation really helped me get a grasp of the method. Thanks.

  • @patton281
    @patton2818 жыл бұрын

    Since in the previous video, we were given a general formula for any diff eq in the form, y''+py'+qy=0, and we found that if we let w=v', then we get the formula, given y_1(x), to be (y_1)w'+(2y_1'+py_1)w=0, could we just skip all those steps in all circumstances? Because, as soon as you showed the problem, I paused, plugged everything into the formula i mentioned and got the same final answer as you did.

  • @roshanshihab8515
    @roshanshihab8515 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks man, you're a life saver. Exam in 10 minutes

  • @esmeraldavargas7180
    @esmeraldavargas71808 жыл бұрын

    Can you please show an example of using an Annihilator to solve a high order equation such as Y^6-Y"=t^2

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын

    this is differential equations. people typically take it after they are done with calculus or in conjunction with their last semester of calculus!

  • @FidaHussain-ue1jq
    @FidaHussain-ue1jq5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you soo much sir , For such an informatic example

  • @yousifsalam
    @yousifsalam3 жыл бұрын

    @07:15 how were you able to just omit the absolute value symbol from w when you canceled e^ln(|w|)?

  • @alessandrovelazquez1558
    @alessandrovelazquez15585 жыл бұрын

    Can I use the cauchy-euler method for this example too??

  • @stephanbotes5865
    @stephanbotes58654 жыл бұрын

    How do you find the Fundament set of equation if it's not given for these specific equations?

  • @frankym5099
    @frankym509910 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for all the helps in math !!

  • @rongxindou7189
    @rongxindou718910 жыл бұрын

    Great teaching! How should I do if f(x) on the right of equation instead of 0?

  • @mehmoodhaydar4766
    @mehmoodhaydar47664 жыл бұрын

    Can this also be used on nonhomogeneous equations?

  • @lifeofmine6342
    @lifeofmine63422 жыл бұрын

    How to find 3rd order linearly independent solution of the equation when two linearly independent solutions are given?

  • @pancakeofdestiny
    @pancakeofdestiny6 жыл бұрын

    You are, as ever, a life saver

  • @lowisl289
    @lowisl2895 жыл бұрын

    can we solve it using euler-cauchy equation? because it has the same equation form ax^2y" + bxy' +cy = 0

  • @leoncage7628
    @leoncage76283 жыл бұрын

    shouldn't the arbitrary constant C1 be added to e^(lnx^-7) instead of multiplying?

  • @streamapp
    @streamapp10 жыл бұрын

    This is also an Euler Cauchy form, in case you were wondering.

  • @jackrecher6986

    @jackrecher6986

    2 жыл бұрын

    it takes like 30 seconds with an E-C haha

  • @hijabzehra4589
    @hijabzehra45897 жыл бұрын

    Helped a lot, thanks.

  • @jorddyy
    @jorddyy9 жыл бұрын

    I thought that y2=vy1, so I did it wrong. But I understand now that vy1 is the general solution. Thank you very much!

  • @plasmalady9871
    @plasmalady98718 жыл бұрын

    Fantastically helpful video

  • @Pel0r
    @Pel0r11 жыл бұрын

    Yeah i understand. Its good to watch for revision anyway. Thank you for your videos.

  • @ericsanchez910
    @ericsanchez9102 жыл бұрын

    How do you know when to use reduction of order on a D.E. ?

  • @ToTheMaxx
    @ToTheMaxx5 жыл бұрын

    Cant we just hire this guy to do all the maths we need for engineering?

  • @sarajaldawlah
    @sarajaldawlah10 жыл бұрын

    Hey Patrick, U R AWESOME! Thank U so much I do really appreciate it.

  • @sharonshavilet5800
    @sharonshavilet580011 ай бұрын

    Excellent teacher🙏🤝

  • @kavishamahabir8340
    @kavishamahabir83408 жыл бұрын

    you are a blessing

  • @MagnusonX
    @MagnusonX9 жыл бұрын

    I am not entirely clear how we identify the Second Solution as x^-5. Please explain.

  • @XxKo0loxX

    @XxKo0loxX

    9 жыл бұрын

    Lars Magnus Earlier on he explained that the question gave one of the two solutions. In this case the given/known solution is x. That is why he multiplied v to x. The standardized procedure is multiplying v into a known solution.

  • @andikafadhlansyah2411
    @andikafadhlansyah24115 жыл бұрын

    thanks a lot Patrick!

  • @Aaronleung1111
    @Aaronleung111110 жыл бұрын

    VERY CLEAR! THANK YOU!

  • @farizgalang7235
    @farizgalang72352 жыл бұрын

    thanks dude, u save my final test in this semester

  • @gustavotintaya2078
    @gustavotintaya20784 жыл бұрын

    YOU MAKE BETTER WORK THAN MY STUPID PROFFESOR IN COLLEGE.

  • @aceandspace
    @aceandspace7 жыл бұрын

    y''-3y^2=0 is it the same way ?i got down to v''x+5v'-3v'x

  • @jeremiahbenton7907
    @jeremiahbenton7907 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent example. Very similar to what you will see

  • @IhazBobo
    @IhazBobo11 жыл бұрын

    Havent done this yet but it seems so fun :)

  • @charmendro
    @charmendro4 жыл бұрын

    can someone explain why the second solution Y_2 was only the first term of that general solution

  • @Pel0r
    @Pel0r11 жыл бұрын

    Thank you. Can i make a question please? How is Game Theory series going. Should we wait more videos in the near future or you need time?

  • @f40f50enzof60
    @f40f50enzof607 жыл бұрын

    One point of fact- it's actually "homogeneous", not "homogenous". Super helpful video!

  • @MrMytubevidmaker
    @MrMytubevidmaker10 жыл бұрын

    !!Does anyone know how to get the first solution (Y1=x)? It is given here, but not with the questions in my book.

  • @rahuljamatia1279
    @rahuljamatia12795 жыл бұрын

    U helped a lot....thanks

  • @lesegomokgabudi5798
    @lesegomokgabudi57985 жыл бұрын

    THANKS BRO .... u are a superhero

  • @raymondzhao1971
    @raymondzhao19713 жыл бұрын

    Isn't the general solution y=C_1(y_1)+C_2(y_2) where you plug the y that you just solved for into y_2?

  • @shahadmadani2124
    @shahadmadani21246 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for saving my life

  • @jkgadgets3826
    @jkgadgets38267 жыл бұрын

    Your videos are so good

  • @joshmusic9766
    @joshmusic97662 жыл бұрын

    I wish I found your videos in high school! (Really I mean to say I wish I cared enough to look) you got me through my college physics degree and I have to say thank you! (And give a broke college student donation)

  • @PhrozenTiger
    @PhrozenTiger11 жыл бұрын

    How can you say w = dv/dx and then dw/dx = d2v/dx2 ? doesnt dw/dx = d2v/dx2 + v? by product or chain rule; since it depends on x?

  • @na3ak4
    @na3ak45 жыл бұрын

    the Vs looking like sqrts and your notation around 2:10 is killing me

  • @rajivsharma509
    @rajivsharma5095 жыл бұрын

    Nice explanation 👌👌

  • @jessicabelfield
    @jessicabelfield10 жыл бұрын

    love your videos! thank you thank you!

  • @patrickjmt

    @patrickjmt

    10 жыл бұрын

    happy to help!

  • @smokeypillow
    @smokeypillow5 жыл бұрын

    Shouldn't the second solution be the first solution multiplied by x? Why is it different here?

  • @aysenuraydogan4712
    @aysenuraydogan471210 жыл бұрын

    veeery helpful, thanks a lot! :)

  • @LockiePockie
    @LockiePockie11 жыл бұрын

    like r u a professor or something in Austin ? I"m in DE right now and these videos are really helpful. thanks alot

  • @beastbaby4849
    @beastbaby48495 жыл бұрын

    Thanks a lot Sir

  • @T.Zy.
    @T.Zy.9 жыл бұрын

    Should be x^-3 though for the last step as we do: 1/(x^4) * x = 1/(x^3) = x^(-3)

  • @sand-barry

    @sand-barry

    8 жыл бұрын

    +whyisthisnicknamebad That is 1/(x^6), I think you're mistaking the exponent -6 for a -4 x^(-6) * x = x^(-5)

  • @mrfahadalazmi89
    @mrfahadalazmi8911 жыл бұрын

    But the way greatest videos I have watched it thank you again

  • @krillinslosingstreak
    @krillinslosingstreak3 жыл бұрын

    Since C_1 is exp(C_0), doesn't that mean that C_1 cannot equal zero? Does that matter for the general solution? You can put C_2 as zero, and get the second solution, but not C_1 to get the exact first solution. Although, C_1 can be arbitrarily close to zero. I'm not sure if this breaks anything...

  • @cdkilo77
    @cdkilo779 жыл бұрын

    How do we solve using the formula if there is no P(x). I have a homework problem asking to solve y''+36y=0 by using the formula. I've read in other places that you cant use the formula in this case. I'm pulling my hair out trying to figure this out.

  • @taylorjaime8108

    @taylorjaime8108

    5 жыл бұрын

    For equations completely missing y variables you can simply let y' = P and y" =P'. For equations completely missing x variables let y' = P and y"= P*P'. Sub these in and then it will be a First Order Diff Eq. Solve with whatever method works and then don't forget to sub in for P and then solve again.

  • @thamannaak4157
    @thamannaak41572 жыл бұрын

    Thanks a lot 🤝

  • @jitendrasingh-nd7kq
    @jitendrasingh-nd7kq5 жыл бұрын

    How can you sure about that general solution will be "v" time of any particular solution when we know that two particular solution can't be linearly dependent???

  • @soumahakase7124

    @soumahakase7124

    5 жыл бұрын

    because "v" is a function of a "x" and not a constant.

  • @PhrozenTiger
    @PhrozenTiger11 жыл бұрын

    Of course, It all make sense now! (atleast most of it..) - Thank you so much

  • @sumayyakamal8857
    @sumayyakamal88573 жыл бұрын

    what does second solution literally mean?

  • @8aL3mEeL8
    @8aL3mEeL88 жыл бұрын

    very clear explanation, I got B in my Calc class just because of you God bless

  • @abdussalamabubakarkura6315
    @abdussalamabubakarkura63157 жыл бұрын

    thank you sir I am very greatful,

  • @mrfahadalazmi89
    @mrfahadalazmi8911 жыл бұрын

    Can you give a book with exercise like this with solutions step by steps please

  • @hmzhunter
    @hmzhunter10 жыл бұрын

    why it's too long for this DE : xy''-y'+4.x^3.y=0 , x>0 y1 = sin(x^2) ???? please answer me !! and there are many DEs ,, I can't Remove/delete V with another V !

  • @tomcarpino7946
    @tomcarpino794610 жыл бұрын

    You're extremely helpful.

  • @robertsishuba6596
    @robertsishuba659610 жыл бұрын

    thanks dude really much appreciated .. i am in south africa but you turned into my lecture by just a click ..

  • @churchill.vivsimsbear
    @churchill.vivsimsbear8 жыл бұрын

    hello there, Im having trouble in solving y'' - 4y' + 4y = 0 , y = e^ (2x) I have tried a number of times by following the example above but Im unable to solve this question. Please help.

  • @BasketOFmuffins

    @BasketOFmuffins

    7 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, i tried to solve it too. I get 2ve^(2x) = 0 and since there is no V' or V'' left in this equation i cannot do a w substitution so i don't know either.

  • @taylorjaime8108

    @taylorjaime8108

    5 жыл бұрын

    For equations completely missing y variables you can simply let y' = P and y" =P'. For equations completely missing x variables let y' = P and y"= P*P'. Sub these in and then it will be a First Order Diff Eq. Solve with whatever method works and then don't forget to sub in for P and then solve again.

  • @PhrozenTiger
    @PhrozenTiger11 жыл бұрын

    you set w = dv/dx ... doesnt that make w a function of v which itself is a funcion of x? thus using the chain rule when culculating the derivetives... when you say w' = v'' you just derive v as normal, not as if it was a function of x... What peice of the puzzle am i missing?

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын

    yeaaaaaaaa! austin / round rock are gonna merge into one megalopolis one day anyways.