A small mistake at 5:17 , the constants should be c1, c2, and c3. Thanks so much for all of your playlists! They're really helpful for my self-studying!

@perseusgeorgiadis7821

Жыл бұрын

also, at the same spot, the formula is e^αt*cos(βt). He forgot the t term in the exponential

@zechenwei1139

Жыл бұрын

@@perseusgeorgiadis7821 AHH,... That's why it felt weird.

@larslagauw5452

11 ай бұрын

TY! I was so confused when I saw that. GPT explained it to me haha

Viewing these vids after some exposure to ODEs has been great. It's really nice to already have some context as it makes the inform stick a bit better the second (or third) time round.

Thanks for doing these videos. I am a self-taught roboticist. You have become my go-to channel for math. Whenever I come across something in my reading I don't understand, I go to your playlists and look for relevant topics. It is pretty common for me to watch a video a couple of times over a few days before I become comfortable relating the material to my work. If I am still struggling, I look for an OCW lecture. With the good foundation your material provides, even the stuff from MIT is reasonably understandable.

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

Very cool, thanks for sharing!

@davidfarning8246

3 жыл бұрын

@@DrTrefor Quick follow-up to my earlier comment. I like your use of graphics. I occasionally print screenshots. Then I use the screenshot as mnemonic devices to recall an aspect of a particular topic. I put the screenshots in a pile near where I eat breakfast. Every morning as I eat breakfast I go through the pile and try to answer two questions. Why did I take this particular screenshot and why is it important to what I am trying to do?

These videos are neat, tidy, to the point, and clear. That's what we want! 👍

I'm very new to differential equations and I swear your videos are by far the best explanations I've seen so far, thanks a lot!

If you were an instructor of my diff class, even if the class was at 8.am all of your coffes'd be from me. Thank you so much man i really appreciate your work and efforts.

Is it supposed to be C3 and not C2 at 5:12?

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

Nice catch! Yes indeed:)

I've already taken Differential Equations but I love how you break down your explanations, so I watch for fun. Thanks for another great video!

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

Great to hear!

@pipertripp

3 жыл бұрын

same.

I liked this you have helped me understand these ODEs

Very Nice and crisp explanation of how the basic idea of solving homogenous homogeous ODEs (with constant coeff) of orders>2 is SIMPLY an extension of finding the solution of ODE's of 2nd order. I recall in college we learnt about the 'D' (differential) operator in the similar to the "r's" in "characteristic" equation. I would request you to make a separate video on this 'D' operator (attributed to the genius American engineer/mathematician Oliver Heaviside), and its inverse '1/D' ( which is the integral operator) and use the Laplace Trasform and makes solving homogenous ODE's of any order look so simple- almost like school algebra and is a standard tool used to solve complex circuits in electrical engineering. Looking forward to more gems from you Prof Bazett

@utuberaj60

3 жыл бұрын

👍

i loveu fr u saving me academically

Beautiful! Thank you!

Nicely done, sir. Keep up your good work

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks, will do!

Thanks a lot sir 🔥🔥🔥

At 5.18, Should the third constant in the final answer be C3, instead of being equal to the second constant C2 ?

Professor Bazett, thank you for an excellent video/lecture on Higher Order Constant Coefficient Differential Equations. DR. Bazett, when you factored r^3 +r equal to zero, you have r(r+i)(r -1)equal to zero) instead of r(r + i)(r - i) equal to zero. There is also two c2 in your final solution. Please correct these small errors in the video.

Nice video! Beyond pure mathematics, just curious what physical phenomenons can be modeled with higher ordered (>2) differential equations?

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

All sorts of things in fluid dynamics in particular. Stopping at acceleration is fairly arbitrary, we can also ask questions like how does acceleration change in time?

at the end, when finding the c4 term, instead of multiplying the c3 term by t, could you multiply the c1 term by t to get c4*t as your final term instead?

Thank you very much!

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

You're welcome!

A mighty beard and a mighty video. Brilliant!

@DrTrefor

3 жыл бұрын

haha thanks!:D

Respect = Dr. Trefor Bazett (with love )

Didn't expect to find better than khan academy

in example 1 could you write c_3 instead of c_2 in the awnser y=c_1 + c_2*cos(t) + c_2*sin(t) ...or what happens to c_3?

@RahulSharma-oc2qd

3 жыл бұрын

That is typo. You are right.

What pen you using i also want to buy to teach my students

e to the it power is cos(t) + isin(t). you're supposed to add an i in front of the sin(t)

How do you know you can divide by a complex number is that still a linear combination

@carultch

8 ай бұрын

A complex number is still just a constant. Complex coefficients are still valid coefficients to use for constructing linear combinations.

made quite a simple mistake at 5:17, it can happen. but please add a disclaimer next time while editing as it can be very confusing.

4:58 should be e^(αt) instead of e^α

if you can always multiply the solutionr by t doesn't it mean that you have an infinite amount of solutions?

@charliesheen2081

Жыл бұрын

There is but they are all just linear combinations of the two linearly independent solutions

@carultch

8 ай бұрын

Good question, but the answer is no. Multiplying by unnecessary factors of t, will produce "solutions" that don't work. As an example, consider: y" + 6*y' + 8*y = e^(-2*t) The correct solution is: y(t) = A*e^(-4 t) + B*e^(-2*t) + 1/2*t*e^(-2*t) Since our given RHS matches one of the homogeneous solutions, we have to multiply by t to create a linearly independent term to account for the overlap. What if we tried C*t^2*e^(-2*t) as one of the solutions? d/dt C*t^2*e^(-2*t) = C*(2*t - 2*t^2)*e^(-2*t) d^2/dt^2 C*t^2*e^(-2*t) = 2*C*(2*t^2 - 4*t + 1)*e^(-2*t) See if this works, as a solution to this diffEQ: 2*C*(2*t^2 - 4*t + 1)*e^(-2*t) + 6*C*[(2*t - 2*t^2)*e^(-2*t)] + 8*C*t^2*e^(-2*t) =?= e^(-2*t) Cancel the common factor: 2*C*(2*t^2 - 4*t + 1) + 6*C*[(2*t - 2*t^2)] + 8*C*t^2 =?= 1 Expand, and combine like terms: 4*C*t^2 - 8*C*t + 2 - 12*C*t^2 + 12*C*t + 8*C*t^2 =?= 1 2*C + 4*C*t =?= 1 We have a linear expression of t on the left, and just a constant on the right. No matter what we make the unknown C equal to, we can't make a multiple of t^2*e^(-2*t) be a solution to the original DiffEQ. Doing this by assuming a solution of C*t*e^(-2*t), we can find a value of C that works. Combining it's derivatives per the LHS, we get: 2*C*e^(-2*t), which is proportional to the given RHS. We have no issue letting C=1/2, to find the particular solution, by having guessed C*t*e^(-2*t).