Rebuilding Architecture from the Ground Up: Andrew Patterson at TEDxAuckland

Andrew is arguably New Zealand's most internationally recognised and published Architect. Last year the worlds most searched architectural Journal, London based 'World Architecture News' named his firm, Patterson Associates as one of five Architects world wide "who's work is set to shape Global Architecture in the 21 century."
He is the designer of New Zealand's only new build 6 Green Star rated project -- Geyser, in Auckland. Rated as international innovator Andrew believes if that if New Zealand is to sustainably succeed its built environment must equal or better its natural environment.
www.pattersons.com/
www.tedxauckland.com/
About TEDx, x = independently organized event
In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

Пікірлер: 18

  • @ShotDownInFlames2
    @ShotDownInFlames210 жыл бұрын

    Architects always talk about their buildings being of the environment and working with the environment and then build big concrete bunkers

  • @rhoelg

    @rhoelg

    Жыл бұрын

    they can have so many design ideas but when the client's budget is peanut they definitely get a peanut!

  • @profkrumdieck
    @profkrumdieck9 жыл бұрын

    Don't really see how the glass monoliths are "like trees"?

  • @p3t3rjhackett

    @p3t3rjhackett

    5 жыл бұрын

    Think about it.

  • @caseyharrington4947
    @caseyharrington49479 жыл бұрын

    NZ WOO!

  • @harr7959
    @harr795910 жыл бұрын

    I am thoroughly confused. It is great that he respects Maori culture and architecture and his discussion of the traditional buildings was inspiring. THEN his projects are nothing but jewelry for the wealthy. The Maori structure that he mentioned has a wonderful connection to the Maori culture and societal structure. But his house seems more like the architect materializing the egos of the owners, nothing more.

  • @p3t3rjhackett

    @p3t3rjhackett

    5 жыл бұрын

    You're right...You are confused!

  • @williamozier918

    @williamozier918

    4 жыл бұрын

    Unfortunately this is how the practuce of architecture goes: architects get inspired by all of these wise interestign things...and the use that inspiration to build a fancy bauble for a wealthy person's ego. for years I went and worked at the Arcosanri project in Arizona.

  • @kayem3824

    @kayem3824

    4 жыл бұрын

    Transition from influences or "inspirations" shouldn't necessarily be direct and mechanical in today's thinking. It's different to the 19th C habit of copying from your source of inspiration, whether whole or fragments/motifs, since mere decoration is shunned now. You have to get to the concept of the thing, and utilize it somehow.

  • @teaohinengaro
    @teaohinengaro11 жыл бұрын

    beautiful

  • @letsallchantloudly
    @letsallchantloudly11 жыл бұрын

    would be nice if he could have pronounced the five te reo words he used properly (even whanau?), even nicer if he hadn't just grabbed fragments of maori culture to apply to his own eurocentric career. obviously those glass and steel buildings are just like trees and are good for the environment too...

  • @p3t3rjhackett

    @p3t3rjhackett

    5 жыл бұрын

    I wonder how many English words you pronounce incorrectly?

  • @glennmchardie1488
    @glennmchardie148811 жыл бұрын

    Inspiringly simple Andrew

  • @vladvamos
    @vladvamos2 жыл бұрын

    His designs and beauty have nothing to do with each other.

  • @duncanclausen8906
    @duncanclausen89067 жыл бұрын

    interesting, powerful and potentially inspiring approach however credibility is lost when the te reo words are glaringly incorrectly pronounced and some of the analogies feel like a stretch, applied superficially to the architecture and not the core concept as implied by this talk..... like its just the same old modernist architecture with some pictures of feathers projected onto the facade.... ie where the maori in the spaces?