I love how Dr. Ross harkens back to when he was 19 and the pivotal moments in that stage of life. One of the biggest moments in my life was when I was 19, arriving back to my shared apartment with my roommates from university. An epiphany descended upon me from the Almighty. I immediately knew that God could not possibly be an old man with a big white beard on a throne in the sky. It was that simple. That set me free. Free to explore the nature of Truth, of what is truly good, of beauty, etc. I could write several books on just how I came full circle to my faith in Christ. It took me to all ends of the earth.

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

An epiphany descended upon me from the Almighty" What was written on the drug package, and any associated health warnings?

@captainfantastic7843

4 ай бұрын

@@aue82a Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. Galatians 6:7

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

@@captainfantastic7843 "whatever a man sows, that he will also reap" In that instance, you are toast.

@truincanada

Ай бұрын

You sir are certainly the loser in this one. Truth hurts.​@aue82a

Hugh Ross is paradigm shattering!! 🎉

God Bless, Hugh! What a blessing!

Really thankful to Dr Ross for this sharing🙏

You are one of God's greatest creations! Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

also not too far away from becoming one of "god's" average cremations.

@paulproulx7410

2 ай бұрын

kiss ass.

This man is a world wide treasure wow!

@TommyTCGT

Жыл бұрын

And a mainstream disinformer, as expected.

@feltorres4807

7 ай бұрын

@@TommyTCGTand what are you doing here?watching him?😅

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

@@feltorres4807 "watching him" Oh yes, and carefully, especially those of us who are opposed to bullshit.

@straightlines7432

2 ай бұрын

Yes and as time goes on with more and more information , more scientists and researchers will realize there has to be a designer . It’s just to fine-tune for life. Even Christopher Hitchens agreed about the fine-tuning for human life.

Thank you Dr. Your view is very convincing backed by science. As a curious person, I will use the link you provide to do further and deeper study into the subject. Greetings from Papua New Guinean.

Thank you Dr. Ross!! Another great video.

@albertochoa7331

10 ай бұрын

It's all bullshit.

This guy,he's my type of guy!

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

book a room then.

@DetVen

23 күн бұрын

​@@aue82a

I enjoyed this immensely. Thank you Dr. Ross.

Really sad, with all the proof of creation ppl (us humans) choose to deny our awesome God, and the provision he made for us to save us sinners so that we hv access to him....our God is mighty ,simply awesome ...

@misael-se5gn

Ай бұрын

Hey God bless you Brother in Christ here, So please forgive me I'm not that educated so I'm gonna try here, I know that Paul wrote that our battle is not against flesh and blood although humanity will always rail against our Creator God, but I believe that for the most part I do believe that the knowing beings we don't see are a big factor "please notice the little ( b ) in the word big"

Apart from the Best Explanation Ever, definitely the BEST English Accent I have ever heard! Canadians has to be the Best! Bradley R. Reddy, Johannesburg, RSA

@bradleyreddy3945

10 ай бұрын

Thank You Dr. Ross

A treasure of information for believers in God and those who do not believe also............great classes from Dr. Ross.

Thank you 🙏🏼

Thank you Dr Ross ❤❤❤

45:23 The bible gets a PERFECT SCORE ON CREATION😀 Awesome summary of each day of creation

Brilliant lesson and some excellent points to help strengthen my faith.

❤ This is so incredible!!!

@TommyTCGT

Жыл бұрын

Incredibly nonsensical.

@joeturner9219

10 ай бұрын

​​​@@TommyTCGTHow so? Oh, it's because you hate the idea of God. You think anything about God is nonsense because you don't WANT God to exist. You aren't interested in evidence. You don't want God to exist because you love living life the way YOU want and that's final. You know if God exists, you would have to submit to Him accept Him to avoid His just judgment and punishment.

@captainfantastic7843

6 ай бұрын

​@@TommyTCGT I can reduce your argument down to a three word declaration:: "Fuck you dad!"

I loved this lecture and it gave me so much clarification of issues, questions. I did find it strange that he said Neanderthals didn’t wear clothing as I’m sure that’s incorrect. Also, I think that they became extinct for several reasons but mainly because God knew that we were the new and improved model and that he likely didn’t want to have us both exist together any longer for his own reasons, whatever they be. I do understand that some of us still carry their dna, which is no biggie but interesting for sure. I also have long understood that species are created fully formed, all at once and that creatures don’t evolve into other forms, it’s unproven nonsense. I love the thought of God creating living beings out of his will, out of thin air as it were! It’s beautiful, miraculous but also is the only thing that makes sense.

@cynic150

Жыл бұрын

i do not think that serious biologists would agree with that last part of yours. Complete species came about out of thin air? Come on!

@SamytheGreek

11 ай бұрын

Out of thin air" is not correct, and "from nothing" is incorrect. We use those fraises all the time but I wonder how any of us can mean them literally. God didn't create Adam out of thin air or from nothing, He did't even create the universe from nothing, out of thin air. As for Neanderthal, the findings are inconclusive, it may simple be that scientists contaminated their samples, or it could be as complicated as tho Neanderthals are animal, somehow their DNA is so close to human that cross breeding could have occurred. Adam's descendants became reprobate before the Noah's flood event, they may have been committing bestiality.

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

How sure are you that "that is incorrect"? These scientists deal with probabilities. what are the probabilities that 2 different species can mate and reproduce?

@clivewells1736

25 күн бұрын

​@@cynic150That is how the fossil record tells it. Look at chimpanzees - on physical and boring, menial, repetitious tasks they are far superior to us whereas we excell at analytical and comparative problem solving. Plus them having 48 chromosomes. That raises a couple more questions... ...coz we got 46.

@cynic150

19 күн бұрын

@clivewells1736 the fossil record doesn't tell you anything. It has to be interpreted. That is where the belief part can cloud your interpretations.

As always Dr. Ross is such a wonderful blessing. Praise God

What a great point about no knew phyla after humans. If evolution is as they say it is, why dont’ we see a constant stream of new ones?

Fantastic Regards Dave from Scotland

I would love to see Dr. Ross debate many of the atheist or quasi-atheist physicists (I.e., Brian Green, Sean Carroll, Michio Kaku, etc.). I think he would likely annihilate them

Save this man at all cost

I love Dr. Ross 🙌

@cynic150

Жыл бұрын

I think he is a big fake.

@joeturner9219

10 ай бұрын

​@@cynic150Why?

@petertaranto8192

9 ай бұрын

How can he be a big fake?

@difficultjourney3216

8 ай бұрын

@@petertaranto8192 Because he's interpreting Genesis to fit his theory of theistic evolution. For example, he's claiming the "days" in Genesis are not to be taken as literal 24 hour periods. However, Exodus 20: 8-11 ties them directly to 24 hour periods. If Mr. Ross's theory is correct than Exodus would be wrong. It would take too much to point out his numerious other misinterpretations. However, the bottom line is this. The creation as described in Genesis and the modern universe of science can never be harmonized because they are completely different realities.

Thank you.

Thanks Ross

Is there any chance to have this presentation with an arabic subtitle ttranslation?

Beautiful.

Animals do know their creator and so do the plants and trees and flowers and planets and stars. The Bible says all of creation speaks so no one can give an excuse for not knowing God. God used a donkey to speak to balaam.

43:45

APL Leukemia treatments of IV arsenic trioxide have given me debilitating peripheral neuropathy in my feet and shins and my hands and fingers. I already suffered from very mild PN from back surgery and existing nerve damage, also I have to take warfarin for an artificial heart valve, that also contributes to my neuropathy. I am taking iron and mag and max dose of neurotin every day. To no avail, please anybody help me I'm struggling to stand and even walk! I can't feel my legs!

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

Pray to Jesus for healing, I will pray for you too.

@DavidVonR

Ай бұрын

I'm so sorry you're dealing with that.

@clivewells1736

24 күн бұрын

Fast and pray. If you're asking your body to heal then give it a rest from processing food so it can do some housework.

what do I have to do to become a Christian?

@B.Rheyjun

25 күн бұрын

Believe in The Lord Jesus Christ that He came from God, He became human and offered His life for our sins, by sacrificing His life for us on the cross in our favor .for those who believes in Him will have eternal life.

I think his arguments against young earth sound very similar to the young earther arguments. The physical laws changed at least once from when they didn’t exist to when they did. I like this guys arguments very much but I would prefer a more humble response to young earthers because I don’t think his arguments are any more reliable than the young earthers. I think there is just too much that we don’t know and he does align the creation with historical Science however science could completely change their theories tomorrow. As I wrote this he kind of talked about being respectful and nice to eachother and I respect that. However he does not have a monopoly on the truth so I like his take but I’m not convinced he is right. I see it as a compelling argument. But I also see the young earth as a compelling argument also. I think we should follow the evidence and our beliefs but also be open to the possibility we are wrong.

Hmmm Genesis. First page, “and God said, let us make man in our image”. Question...who was he talking to?

@winniecash1654

Жыл бұрын

Michael Heiser answers this, but I don't think all scholars agree with him.

@amytrumbull156

Жыл бұрын

One explanation is that he’s “talking “ to himself in the triune being of God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. How do we understand this triune nature? We don’t! It’s one of the mysteries and also just a way for the limited mind of a human to grasp a concept that is beyond our ability to comprehend. The creation cannot understand the ultimate creator and to even attempt to fully “know” is folly. The book was written for humans to understand as best as we can in our current, embodied and limited way. I personally embrace and accept that, at least while I’m living in a human body I’ll never be able to understand or comprehend the fullness of the creator.

@jn5962

Жыл бұрын

​@@amytrumbull156 Hi, the Holy Trinity doctrine is critical to one's salvation. Some Christians go even to say if one rejects this doctrine, one is not saved. Let me explain: ▪︎I have searched long and hard, no one - pastors, Bible scholars and teachers can understand the Trinity. ▪︎If it is truly incomprehensible, or comprehensible to only a few, then how can the Christian community ever know who Jesus is. ▪︎If one cannot know who Jesus is, how does one love, follow and obey him? ▪︎Then, in what manner, can one hope to have his/her sins forgiven and be granted everlasting life? So, you see - holding by faith to the Holy Trinity as basis of salvation, only leads to one losing his/her salvation. If you find it more comforting, keep the Holy Trinity - but leave in the back-burner of your mind. But in your daily communion with God, apply this knowledge to establish grounding of your relationship with them. ▪︎The Father is the LORD God - the Almighty and Most High of all. ▪︎The Son is Jesus Christ, Son of the LORD God, sent by the Father as Son of Man, to bring about salvation of the world. ▪︎The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the LORD God and the spirit of Jesus - as one. Until you have come to the Father (Jn 14:6), address Him as "the LORD". (For other gods may respond if you asked for "God".) Until you are certain you personally know Jesus, call out to him as "Lord Jesus" or "Jesus Christ". (For there are others who also bear the name "Jesus") May the LORD God bless you through the ministry of Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit.

Why we don’t have unicorns

Day can mean ETERNAL.

What is a neanderthal?

This again ? How many times do I have to tell You Tube I'm simply not interested ?

So which animals were there at 8% oxygen, that then became extinct ? and where does it’s say so in the bible or point to this period?

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

The Bible doesn't get into it but the period of time was from the Avalon explosion to the Cambrian.

@54:00 concerning Adam and Eve's children marrying brother and sister. It didn't have to continue for very long, the Bible says that Adam and Eve had many sons and daughters ,they didn't all have to marry each other, it must have been that the first few brother and sister marriages had to occur but soon after that it could have been uncle and niece, cousin to cousin. It's not that big a deal.

@showmeanedge

10 ай бұрын

Secular science has their "Mitochondrial Eve" - the woman that we can all trace our mitochondrial DNA back to. They claim that there must have been women before her but obviously there had to have been a first human woman, even from a naturalist standpoint. In any case, she existed and knowing that she did we have to infer that inbreeding happened in human history. Her daughters were the only women to pass on her DNA. It's interesting to ask a nonbeliever why they're comfortable with this incest happening in a world of cold determinism but are suddenly offended if God allowed it. At the end of the day it's just another dishonest argument on their side - genetic bottlenecks have to exist in all species even from the evolutionary point of view (when species evolve there can't be more than two new members: the likelihood of it happening once seems to be astronomical but there needs to be two who find each other and mate) and that's seen as perfectly fine until somebody mentions Jesus and then suddenly they're scoffing and nudging each other over the "immorality" or "scientific ignorance" of God.

@kevinurquhart2469

2 ай бұрын

If we are all living in fat 7, then Adam was born yesterday.

It is a shame that these fidgety and disinterested children are sitting up front. Very disrespectful to his gift and intelligence. God bless you, Hugh Ross!

6 epochs of creation time for 6 days? Did He bring everything into existence in those 6 days? His spirit hovered over the surface of the waters on the first day, meaning on day 1, the Heavens and the Earth were already in existence. Where had this surface of the waters His spirit hovered over come from ? I take it during the 6 days He perfected a universe that He had already created times earlier.

@DetVen

23 күн бұрын

That's the way I see it myself.

So what is a Neanderthal? Another beast?

What about dinosaurs? When did they exist? Is there any evidence that they actually did?

@MutsPub

Жыл бұрын

They would have been Created on day five. Dinosaurs are not mentioned in the Bible. The fossil record is clear. Dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago. Dinosaurs did not coexist with man.

@allstarwatt7246

Жыл бұрын

dinosaurs existed millions of years before we did.

@allthingsbing1295

9 ай бұрын

No evidence for “dinosaurs”

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

Last of the dino went extinct 60 million years ago.

@allthingsbing1295

8 ай бұрын

@@SamytheGreek fairy tales

0 there is evening and there was morning the first day God called the LIGHT THE DAY and never ⁰ call The Night time darkness part of the day because the Darkness separated the 6 days of creation The morning broke the DARKNESS'S and there was light } LIGHT the first day God called the LIGHT THE DAY But the darkness was not called the day

What part of 6 days is so hard to understand?...God Bless!!!

@spoopyradicalsnake

10 ай бұрын

ikr, solar system moves at 140 miles per seconds

@difficultjourney3216

8 ай бұрын

@@spoopyradicalsnake "Solar Systems" are a theory that dont exist.

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

What part of 12 hours called a day dont you understand, what part of a long time also called day dont you understand? 6 -24 hour days just dont work scientifically, a long but finite period of time works perfectly, scientifically. ....now move along and dont bother the adults, I had a long day at work today, all 8 hours.

'God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.' (Genesis 1:16) How to get around this, it seems God did make sun, moon and stars on the fourth day, before 'light' on the first day' and 'vegetation' on the third day? The order doesn't seem right? Please enlighten me

@succulentsfun

Жыл бұрын

What a stupid question! God is light, He is the source of light Himself. Can't He sustain anything as His will? The seemly contradictory Scriptures is such a wonderful way to lift our mind above the boundaries of what we can comprehend.

@curbroadshow

Жыл бұрын

The question you should be asking is - why did god create the universe twice? Genesis 1 to Genesis 2 3 ends with ‘Thus the heavens and the earth were completed’. Then Genesis 2 4 starts creation again with ‘This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens’ Why did the god make it twice? The patriarchs, Abraham, Noah, Jacob, etc. were Caananites and worshipped a council of gods with El at the head, he had a wife/consort Ashera and his council of gods included Baal, Mot, Yam, Ashtar, Shahar and many others who all had different duties and responsibilities, collectively called the Elohim, you see evidence of this in the names of people and places, ie Isra-el, Dani-el etc. etc. It wasn’t until around 500-600BCE, during the Babylonian exile that the banished priests began worshipping Yahweh, a monotheistic deity. They rewrote the old myths and legends to urge the Israelites to worship the new god concept. That’s why there are two creation accounts, two flood stories, two sets of Ten Commandments. Genesis 1 to Genesis 2 verse 3 is the account of the Elohim creating the heavens and earth, in the Hebrew Bible it calls them the Elohim, translated simply as ‘god’ in the English versions. “Then god (Elohim) said, let us (plural) make mankind in our (plural) image, in our (plural) likeness”. Genesis 2 1 “Thus the heavens and earth were completed” and the account finishes with the Elohim resting on the seventh day. Then Genesis 2 verse 4 begins the story again with Yahweh (translated as ‘Lord god’ or ‘Lord’) as the creator. “This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord god (Yahweh) made the earth and the heavens”. After the conversion to monotheism the worship of the old gods was frowned upon, statues of Ashera were smashed and burnt, and her name removed from the biblical record, and in Kings, Elijah tests the priests of Baal before discrediting and slaughtering them for worshipping the gods that their own ancestors, the patriarchs, worshipped. Psalm 82: El (god) has taken his place in the divine council, among the Elohim (gods) he judges.

@fudgedogbannana

Жыл бұрын

Ross does explain that quit extensively. i would just remind you that the Bible's first 10 words says that in the beginning God created the whole universe, so the light was created in the beginning.

@succulentsfun

Жыл бұрын

@@fudgedogbannana Don't you think the first 10 words is a summary? Then explains how the work be done in 6 days, step by step?

@succulentsfun

Жыл бұрын

@@fudgedogbannana Love Dr Ross but I am more convinced by Chunk Missler's explanation :)

Why do we need a Book other than the Bible to understand the Book of Genesis? Didn't Jesus forbid Buying and Selling in his House?

We are wholly on our own. There is no supernatural dimension, no invisible man in the sky watching everything we do, and the concept of sin is just an alternate manifestation of guilt.

@thehylers1021

3 ай бұрын

You are in denial. More brilliant minds than you or I have been thinking about the origins of life and mankind. How many hours have you spent researching these things? Educate yourself. God bless.

@DavidVonR

Ай бұрын

Should we have guilt if there is no God and we're merely material organisms with no free will?

@DetVen

23 күн бұрын

Heaven and God are not in the sky. The sky is in the sky. Heaven and God are in another dimension.

way too quiet it needs to be 200% louder

But i dont believe that earth is billion of years of age

@difficultjourney3216

8 ай бұрын

It's not.

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

Lots of scientist have measured it, its what they come up with. Only Bishop Usher a couple of hundred years ago added up the names in the genealogy between Adam and Abraham that we first learned of 6000 years.

@difficultjourney3216

8 ай бұрын

@@SamytheGreek Only Bishop Usher? You'd be wrong about that. A young earth is found in both Hebrew and Christian tradition. For example, according to the official Hebrew calender of Israel the year is 5,784 based on Genesis. Science has no proven/reliable way to date the earth.

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

@@difficultjourney3216 Yes, there are Jewish (creation of Adam) and Muslim young Earth's. Yes, scientists do know the age of the universe and the Earth and can measure it with great accuracy. Uranium dating, thorium dating are very accurate.

@difficultjourney3216

8 ай бұрын

@@SamytheGreek You're wrong again..science has no reliable way to determine the age of the earth. If they did there would be no debate. For example, Christian scientists like Jonathan Sarfati make a strong case for a young earth. You really need to stop commenting till you know what you're talking about.

I believe in the LORD GOD Almighty Not man. Satan at work in this time of darkness. John. 8: 32. And ye shall know the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall make you FREE. (King James Version.)

@spoopyradicalsnake

10 ай бұрын

I also believe in Lord God Almighty; His worlds are the only truth in this universe

Is his interpretation of Genesis shared by any other group, faith, religious tradition, apologetic. All this seems kind of new to me. The idea that the spirit of god Hovered over the water being the same as the point of view of this book is someone hovering over the water below the clouds is not a natural following of the text. For example is it even possible for god to have a point if view since he is everywhere? I have a feeling that if you looked at what Jews and early christians believed about the text it would be a very different interpretation than the one presented here. Just my opinion.

So.many ads.

The Q&A part works better for me when I just listen & not watch. The kids at the table in the foreground are not mature enough for this lecture and they're distracting. SuperBook cartoons would probably be more appropriate for them.

Sorry it sounds just to low... I'm so sick of most petioles sound is good then u get what? Ivo crack the volume so high ACS then lower for the next video that's gonna play...😮UR a speaker I don't the back row can hear u🙄

Do animals go to heaven? It’s a question most of us have pondered, especially after losing a beloved animal companion. The Bible actually has a lot to say on this topic. And for those of us who hope to spend eternity with our animal family members, it’s good news. Several Bible verses depict animals in heaven: The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the cobra’s den, and the young child will put its hand into the viper’s nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.” -Isaiah 11:6-9 Then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea, and all that is in them, saying, ‘To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!’” -Revelation 5:13

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

will I find my deceased pet rat in heaven?

@Zellonous

2 ай бұрын

​@@aue82ayes :)

I think something's wrong with the camera because it went 10 12.

If animal fossil's were found, how could they survive or grow, without food? Without vegetation, all animals must have been carnivores?

Please talk louder or use a better microphone. Thank you

God created the heavens and the Earth First the heaven's before the actual ⁰ Earth God called the dry land EARTH on the third day Of creation God called the FIRMAMENT HEAVEN on the SECOND day of the creation The EARTH was without form and VOID on the First day of the creation JOB 38 verse. 4. and 7 WHEN I LAID THE FOUNDATIONS O] THE EARTH THE MORNING STARS SANG TOGETHER and all sons of God shouted for joy

Hugh Ross did Stephen Hawkings voice. Fact. He's also as wrong as Stephen Hawking.

Not sure what's going on here. If made so plausible with all these qualifications (an education in itself; who has it?), then the Bible should have mass appeal. Everything makes specific sense now whereas there was mystery before with the onus on believing rather than understanding. If we were to rewrite the Bible the way Dr. Ross has it, would we still have, as a result, the Bible, or some other work? I am not sure where to draw a line. So many versions of the Bible have been written but all maintain a high degree of the supernatural and hard to grasp. Why has the "Dr. Ross Bible" not yet been written? Or has it? And how far can we bend science to incorporate the "facts" of the Bible? I'd love to follow Dr. Ross, but am not sure about the role and extent of interpretation, even, or especially, if correct! What happens to the Bible and us? What remains to believe? And wasn't faith the cornerstone of Christianity? I am now very much puzzled. I wrote to Reasons in Canada about just this point but haven't got a reply as yet.

@pauljepson1379

Жыл бұрын

FORGET H ROSS, STICK TO THE THE ONLY CORRECT TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE THE KING JAMES AND LIVE FOR CHRIST WHO DIED FOR YOU, ROSE VICTORIOUS FROM THE GRAVE AND IS COMING BACK VERY SOON NOW. CONCENTRATE ON THE IMPORTANT STUFF. YOU CAN ASK JESUS ONE DAY TO EXPLAIN GENESIS. GOD BLESS YOU LAD

@gerardmoloney433

Жыл бұрын

Nick, the Bible is the word of God and Dr Hugh Ross is a highly gifted man of God who believes in the inerrancy of the Bible. Being an astrophysicists he sees the glory of God's creation and realises that the heavens DECLARES the glory of God as the Bible states. So the book of Nature is the scientific evidence that confirms the authenticity of the Bible. There has NEVER been a scientific discovery that contradicts the Bible. Dr Ross uses his great gift to show how there is no contradiction between the book of Scripture and the book of Nature. God doesn't expect his children to have blind faith, that's why He sent His Son Jesus Christ down to dwell amongst us and prove that He is one with God Father. He did this by fulfilling Scripture and working miracles to prove who He is, the Son of God. Dr. Hugh Ross makes that easy for us to understand by using the great gift of comprehension and combining the 64 books of Scripture using the scientific method which came from the Bible; put everything to the test and hold fast to that which is good. Very few people have the capability to collate the 64 books of the Bible as Hugh Ross has and integrate them with such wisdom and knowledge of the universe and the workings of God's Laws of physics. The more scientific and archaeological discoveries that are made the more proof of the accuracy of the Bible. I thank God for people like Dr Ross who can show the truth of the Bible in simplicity. God bless you. Maranatha

@maync1

Жыл бұрын

Don't be too easy on yourself. No, H Ross is great as he leads me to see these "book of nature" truths revealed in the Bible and vice versa. Also, I don't think God is a stickler for words, we can use interpretation without contradicting the spirit of the Holy Book. After all, He has given us the capacity of think.

@maync1

Жыл бұрын

I tend to agree with you and thank you. Be God with you.

@lisafosse6031

Жыл бұрын

@@pauljepson1379 Paul I agree totally. At 27:00 Mr. Ross says, “Let there be lights in the sky. God didn’t make the sun, moon and stars.” Reg flags are shooting up. Gen l :16, “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.” King James Bible. I don’t know which Bible he believes, but it’s wrong. Sounds like Mr. Ross is am evolutionist to me. I can’t figure out Genesis 1, but I believe every word in my King James Bible. Our focus is to go out into all the world and preach the Gospel. Keep standing on God’s word brother!!

No mater the BS someone talks, there is always some people that will listen and think its great.

Everything said in this video is impressively wrong. However, ... Credit where credit is due. 1. At least you're consistent. and 2. Kudos for allowing comments under this video; which 98% of Christian-Fundamentalist channels won't allow, because they don't want to risk their sheeple being exposed to sound reasoning and real data.

@ENFPerspectives

Жыл бұрын

Where is your proof - not just accusations? I know the Bible and the only thing that sticks out is God making us in His image? Where did that part come in?

@ByGraceThroughFaith777

Жыл бұрын

We welcome your thoughts, but saying the video is impressively wrong without saying what and why doesn't help your case.

@joeturner9219

10 ай бұрын

Debate him then. See if you can "correct" him...

@ApPersonaNonGrata

10 ай бұрын

​@@joeturner9219 humansocialsystems.blogspot.com/2023/08/responding-to-reasons-to-believe-hugh.html

@ApPersonaNonGrata

10 ай бұрын

@@ENFPerspectives I never received a notification of your reply. But if you read the reply I just posted to Joe Turner, you'll see some of what I think about this.

Christ returned in AD 70 just as the Bible tells us he would. Yeshua himself told us that he would return to the generation to whom he spoke. Matt 24:34, Matt 16:27,28, Luke 21:32, mark 13:30

@brucetowell3432

7 ай бұрын

Yes, that generation is this one. Those of us who were born AFTER May 14th, 1948, if we live long enough , would witness the Rapture. Generation = 100 years approx.

The Bible was written for Believer of God & His Word. Jn.18v37, Jn.8v31+. Deut. 8 v3 quoted by Jesus in Matt.4v4, which includes Jere.17v5. I agree with you Nick. Why should I depend on all unbelieving Hebrew scholars, who if they were led by God would follow Jesus & teach us Mark 11v24- 26.. ; HOW to forgive from the heart, & know Jesus' overcoming Peace, Matt.18v35, Mk.11v24- 26, Jn.17v26. THIS HAS ALL TO DO WITH BELIEVING GOD'S PROMISES & THEIR EVIDENCE. I DONT THINK THAT BELIEVING CONTRADICTIONS TO GOD'S WORD WILL HELP US :Gen 3, Matt.4 Even in the english language,the word 'day' has various meanings, & Jesus says, 'Are there not 12 hours in a day' So whatever the various meanings of 'day', are in the Bible, The Word of God says, " God separated the light from the darkness. The light he called day, & the darkness He called night. And the evening & the morning was the first day. So in one verse God used the word day in 2 different ways. ? IS GOD LIMITED BY THE LAWS OF SCIENCE WHICH HE SET UP? HOW DID JESUS FILL THE NET WITH FISH & LATER PUT A COIN IN THE BELLY OF THE FIRST FISH THAT HE SENT PETER TO CATCH? IS GOD telling us to ignore the non- scientific appearence of the account in genesis because it means something that only SOME SCIENTISTS CAN EXPLAIN? DoES NOT GOD SAY THAT HE CREATED THE HEAVENS & THE EARTH & EVERYTHING IN THEM IN 6 DAYS? & CONFIRMED IT IN EXODUS 20? SO WHY SHOULD i listen to a man who speaks of miracles yet implies evolution. LISTEN TO PROFESSOR OF BIOLOGY, Dr. Gary Parker ( Creation, The facts of Life).. who explains why evolution depends on suffering ,decay, and death, when it clearly states that the animals & man, were created to eat plants, not to kill for food, Gen 1v29,30..Listen to James Tour, professor of Biochemistry. SO WHY, as a believer in God's written Promises, Wisdom & Warnings, DO I need a deep sccentific expert to explain & give better understanding of details & correction of what God says. Is it so that I believe in Him, and be recommended to spend time listening to thieir special interpretIons, & read their books to undertand better & so help an atheist to believe?? which they say is confirmed by modern scientific findings?? FO I NEED ALL THIS TO HELP AN UNBELIEVER, WILL MY OVERRCOMING PEACE & POWER OF LOVE FROM MY SAVIOUR, GIVE LIGHT TO THE UNBUEVER OF HOW GOD'S KNOWLEDGE ; PROMISES ARE TRUE & VITAL FOR QUALITY LIFE IN ME, INORDER TO REPAIR BROKEN RELATIONSHIPS?? DO I NEED THIS, WHEN God has given me faith in His Word, His precious promises, His Warnings to believers Jn.12v 35, MARK 4v23- 25 , & His faithful fellowship, to teach me all that I need, to be set free from the misleading & Dominion of SIN Gen.4v7..?? JER 17v5 WARNS US, & Prov. 3 5-6 INSTRUCTS us, to acknowledge GOD , God's ADVICE in ALL OUR WAYS... THIS IS CALLED BELIEVING IN JESUS, WHO IS, THE WORD OF GOD.. SO I DONT NEED SOPHISTICATED INTERPRETAtions , to keep me from suffering mockery from unbelievers, & evolutionist.

@ENFPerspectives

Жыл бұрын

"Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." 2 Timothy Whether or not its 6 days or a billion, its still a miracle. You need to chill.... Listen. Pray.

Reasons to deceive, Hugh Ross. This cult leader plays a game, and pretends to exude humility and sincerity, but he is proud, puffed up and arrogant. He deludes himself, and thinks he is some kind of gnostic. He writes a book titled "Why the universe is the way it is". As though he has all the answers. Ross rejects the creation account, and contaminates scripture with Big Bang secular philosophies that directly contradict scripture. He rejects the global flood and says it was just a local flood, and believes there was death before Adam's sin. He claims there were "pre-adamites". (people who supposedly lived before Adam). His faith is in Big Bang, and he has constructed a religious cult that conforms to it. Don't be so easily deceived, people...Gods word warns of these types in the last days.

He’s very selective in his use of highly elastic definitions of words while ignoring ancient Hebrew understanding of nature and cosmology. And never explains how flying birds appear on scene before amphibians and reptiles which are said to be land animals / wild beasts of the field but we know birds evolved from dinosaurs / reptiles.

@toddgardner2826

2 ай бұрын

He is not an ancient Hebrew and no Hebrew existed at the time these events occurred. Instead he is looking and observing what can be seen in the sky right now and observing what happened so very long ago because the time the light has traveled to reach the earth is from the beginning. Hebrew has nothing to do with it. The speculation that birds came from dinosaurs is in question. He did discuss that phylum were created before species. He did site those references. The opposite of what would be expected from natural selection. He did not draw a conclusion as it is still in question. The science keeps changing from what was a great guess towards what was written thousands of years ago... written by a Hebrew hand, okay maybe so, but regardless of the ghost writer, the author was the entity dictating to the ghost writer... that is the point. He is not talking about an ancient Hebrew religion or culture. He is talking about a creative entity that connects with His creation to form a relationship. Dr. Ross is like God's pet dog. And God's pet dog is smarter and greater than both you and I.😅😅

There are plenty of reasons NOT to believe, but you have to have a brain.

Sorry but it is 6 LITERAL DAYS. Moshe/Moses by the Spirit gives us the irrefutable context in Exodus 20: “for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.” ‭‭Exodus‬ ‭20‬:‭11‬ ‭KJV‬‬ Scripture with Scripture. You can still get an old earth by the Genesis Gap theories. You have to go to school to be as dumb as “modern science”. God gave us The Book. Use it.

@MutsPub

Жыл бұрын

Exodus 20 is an analogy of God's pattern. See KZread Video - "Genesis and Creation days Hugh - Ross and Walter Kaiser"

@cynic150

Жыл бұрын

Every faith has slightly differing views on everything. That is why faith is not reliable.

@MutsPub

Жыл бұрын

@@cynic150 1) Please tell us how the Bible stated that the universe had a beginning? - Big Bang! 2) Please tell us how the Bible stated that land plants came before sea animals? 3) Please tell us how the Bible stated that the Universe is expanding? 4) Please tell us how the Bible stated 4 correct initial starting conditions of the Early Earth? 5) Please tell us how the Bible stated 10 Creation events in the correct chronological sequence? 6) Moses documented 4 correct starting conditions of the early Earth. - Genesis 1 a) Moses documented 10 Creation events in the correct chronological sequence. - Genesis 1 b) The (Babylonian) Enuma Elish only gets 2 out of these 14 correct. c) "ALL" other holy books get NONE of the 14 correct! - ZERO!! The Bible is unique in that it is the only Holy Book that gets 14 out of 14 of these events correct! (The Bible is the inerrant word of Yahweh!) All other holy books are lacking and cannot be from Yahweh, the Creator of the universe, matter, space, time, and energy. Yahweh did not inspire these other authors. Therefore, all other holy books, outside of the Bible, are man made fantasy literature (fiction) and are thus irrelevant. Of course, you are fully aware the only way that it is possible for these and many other confirmed scientific facts to have been accurately documented by Biblical Authors thousands of years ago is by Yahweh. The Earth is 4.5662 +/- 0.0001 billion years old. The Universe is 13.79 +/- 0.004 billion years old. Given these accurate ages, that the Biblical Authors could not have possibly known, you think they got their facts from aliens?!! All testable! - doh! Open your mouth, insert foot, chew vigorously. - Hilarious!

The problem I see here is the erroneous assumption that (i) our universe is physical and (ii) there's a personal deity operating outside our purview. Einstein was game enough to admit that our (material) reality is mere illusion, albeit it a very persistent one. He saw good sense in Spinoza's mature Monistic notion of God. I agree with him. We're more than just passive bystanders (believers) in Creation. The dualistic model of the Old Testament is for the kids amongst us on spiritual trainer wheels and as yet unable to see who and what we really are. The great quantum physicists have realised science's incompetence in dealing with Ultimate Reality. Our physical existence is a minor part of our being. We're in a school that affords us a chance of growing in consciousness. That's more than Christianity permits with its dualism and prison of dogma and stagnant tradition. Time to get real, folks. As Eckhart Tolle has reminded us: we either evolve or die as a species. Einstein said the same thing.

@eswn1816

Жыл бұрын

"Einstein was game enough to admit that our (material) reality is mere illusion, albeit it a very persistent one." I have studied Einstein and this does not sound like an accurate representation of his views. In fact, he was quite opposed to the Quantum interpretation. He was a 'realist' commenting that the moon exists whether we look at it or not. Do you have a citation to support your claim?

@rrnonya5472

Жыл бұрын

The problem I see here is... Your comment has nothing to do with the material presented.

@SamytheGreek

Жыл бұрын

Does this sound like dualism and prison of dogma and stagnant tradition to you?

@aue82a

4 ай бұрын

the moment you mentioned Feckwit Toll, confirmed the fact that you just ran over a landmine that targets bullshit.

Total tosh.

@LookOutForNumberOne

Жыл бұрын

I agree, he's using a modification of the Kalam argument. Since he is using that as the beginning of his talk, then he is technically full of it (BS)

@toddcott9510

Жыл бұрын

It's amazing just how far people can bend over backwards, to make things fit. Best form Scotland.

@LookOutForNumberOne

Жыл бұрын

@@toddcott9510 Roger that, shit, yesterday I went to take a machine to Carlisle. 5 hours one-way, very close to Scotland.

@MutsPub

Жыл бұрын

How profound. - pffft!

@MutsPub

Жыл бұрын

@@toddcott9510 No, what is amazing is how strongly willful ignorance can imprison an arrogant person. Nothing is being bent over backwards or twisted in any way! The FACT that you don't know the Hebrew word for "day" and that it has four "literal" definitions is on YOU!

I can't believe in a God ..who ordained animals to tear each other .and disease and sickness and death ..sounds like a sick creator .

@showmeanedge

10 ай бұрын

But you can live in the world? It doesn't seem to bother you that much.

@SamytheGreek

9 ай бұрын

What does it sound like with no God at all?

Man, I listened to this and I could not believe how many lies he said. Animals did NOT appear all at once when the oxygen level reached 8%. And even if that were true, it is the fine tuning fallacy argument.

@toddgardner2826

2 ай бұрын

His books site the published studies. He has receipts and has made them available to you. He is an astrophysicist... the biology is taken from the works of the leading biologists and their published works. Most of them atheists. But scientific discovery is scientific discovery regardless of your beliefs.

Yea, claiming to believe Bible, and still talking about billions years nonsense.... when Bible clearly states The Days!

@Sooner-im9qf

4 ай бұрын

"Day" does not necessarily mean a 24 hour day. Also, the word has more than one meaning in Hebrew.

@revelation1790

4 ай бұрын

Ex 20:8-11 God says they were 24 hour days.

Not convinced at all! Genesis is so full of fundamental errors, like the earth being made first, then the sun and stars four days later. The earth being fixed in space and the sun moving around it. Silly old creation myth, no science there at all.

@creinicke1000

Жыл бұрын

If there is a all powerful God.. wouldn't the planets, stars, all of universe be His creation and like prices on a table manipulated whater way He wants? Why would Such a God have any interest in Mankind? I have no idea, but I have faith that such an entity exists and is outside of time and space that we live in, so to me it all makes sense. I'd ask you Why you dont see a purposeful plan in all nature? Everything mankind goes another step deeper into science it just justifies a Plan. Chaos can't produce life and everything we see and can't see.

@mirandahotspring4019

Жыл бұрын

@@creinicke1000 Because you are unable to understand the science doesn't mean a god made everything.

@Realivangarcia

Жыл бұрын

@@mirandahotspring4019 processes and hierarchies come from somewhere. They don’t just magically appear randomly as so many atheists claim lol

@mirandahotspring4019

Жыл бұрын

@@Realivangarcia Oh get real. People form them all the time. Well into the 21st century and idiots still believe in ancient fairy tales as the explanation for everything. There are no gods, no evil spirits, no Santa Claus, and no tooth fairies. I suppose you think unicorns are real too?

@preoccupied4800

Жыл бұрын

Genesis is not full of errors, quite the opposite. It is incredible that a book that goes back to the beginning of writing contains such profound scientific truth. The bible describes cosmological expansion, dark matter and relativity. These were all understood by everyone in preceding generations as poetry but as time passes we see they are truths. Here's a question for you (posed by Nobel Prize winning physicist Frank Wilcek) what would you conclude if you lived in earlier generations and saw the sun rise in the east and set in the west every day? It is logical to say the the sun moves around the earth, because relative to you it does. Genesis though does not say that that, nor does it say that the earth is at the centre of the cosmos. It does say there is more in the universe than in your philosophy though

Nice guy, but flawed analogy.

Dr. Ross is an absolute heretic

I’m glad he had the decency to not say there are GOOD reasons to believe in any god.😜

Believing because someone, a long time ago, believed a made up story, is a poor excuse to believe.

@SamytheGreek

8 ай бұрын

Right you are, but prophets were inspired by God to write what they did, also it is by God that understanding is given to you, if you dont understand maybe it isn't for you.

@gregjones2217

8 ай бұрын

@@SamytheGreek It seems rather unlikely that anyone was devinly inspired to write anything. Considering the fact that only one percent of the biblical era people could both read and write, and those were likely scribes. As the supposed disciples were fishermen and common folk, at best their narrative was handed down over the generations and likely embellished. The tales were in fact used by the Romans to mollify the illiterate early Christians. This was far easier and less expensive than deploying an army to subdue them. The first bible was, in fact, ordered by the Roman emperor Constantine and was written in accordance with his wishes. This brings significant doubt concerning the authenticity of the bible. Further, the first Catholic Church had as its pope a close relative of the emperor. All of the above and the unlikely tales told, casts many serious doubts on the whole thing.

@thehylers1021

3 ай бұрын

One day you will accept the fact that you want to know the truth about the Benevolent God Creator. I 🙏 for you.

It takes gullibility to consider sacred the claims like invisible beings, talking snake / donkey, sin-salvation, demon pigs, 900 yrs old man, virgin birth, walking on water, turning water into wine, resurrection, flying chariots of fire, curses, levitation into clouds, etc. It takes motivated ignorance & arrogance to believe the burden of disproving the claim is on those who are not gullible.

Sorry but this person has something very creepy about him. He is too confident and too calm in the way he talks. True scientists do not talk like that. So I am very suspicious about his theories and preaching mode. To use the Bible as a reference is extremely suspect in scientific terms.

@showmeanedge

10 ай бұрын

He's a Caltech astronomer. Claiming he's not a scientist because you don't like his conclusions is pretty cult-like thinking.

@cynic150

10 ай бұрын

@@showmeanedge When you have faith, your conclusions are presumed.

@showmeanedge

10 ай бұрын

@@cynic150 presupposition is a facet of faith, lol. You're making an a priori statement about other people with no sense of irony whatsoever.

@cynic150

10 ай бұрын

@@showmeanedge Yes but he purports to be a scientist. Faith is not a scientific proof of anything.

@showmeanedge

10 ай бұрын

@@cynic150 he doesn't purport to be a scientist. He is a scientist. Your steadfast refusal to admit that a scientist can be a man of faith is almost religious. Isaac Newton was a Christian as well - does that disqualify his achievements?

Ridiculous, preposterous, eminently foolish -

People like Hitler or Mussolini cannot live long lives. Death is the cost of sin. A sinful man will not live a long life. Your reasoning may be a bit off.