Drinking alcohol before debunking muslim creationists is a power move.

@enlacostaizquierda

Ай бұрын

That or self medicating for the coming pain.. and the stupid from the muslim video is painful

@DavisJ-ln6fw

Ай бұрын

Epic power move though he did look a little tipsy at the end

@imnouha

Ай бұрын

islamophobic lmao

@icycooldrink6085

Ай бұрын

Laphroaig scotch, no less.

@fabrislemos

Ай бұрын

Next time he'll add a bacon sandwich

These guys do the same thing that every apologist does - they conflate colloquial terms with scientific ones in order to dismiss the scientific theory. It's the single most infuriating thing that creationists do.

@barnabasrsnags4828

Ай бұрын

Extremely

@DavisJ-ln6fw

Ай бұрын

Creationists love doing this. I remember when Kent Hovid fans used to say Stellar formation and Biological Diversification were the same because both use the term evolution as if everything that uses that term is the same theory.

@FeliciaByNature

Ай бұрын

@@DavisJ-ln6fw they *still* do this, not just kent hovind but his adopted abusive gremlin matt powell does it too.

@Pancakegr8

Ай бұрын

I agree. It's especially infuriating because their whole ideology is full of vague metaphors. They sit and study for hours just trying to clear word definitions in scripture, but when it comes to science, they take whatever they think is the definition of a word and run with it.

@vladpadowicz5946

Ай бұрын

The only thing more infuriating is their moronic snickering and giggling as they prove their level of utter ignorance

Fascinated by how much time they spent calling out Cognitive Bias. "Researchers WANT to believe this, therefore everything proves it" Do I even need to explain what they're doing themselves...

@miraqen7801

9 күн бұрын

basically, replace _researchers_ with [insert apologist religion] 🤣

@riluna3695

2 күн бұрын

"Researchers WANT to believe this! That's why every time they learn more they change their story! Because they're so devoted to believing that story despite all the evidence that they keep accounting for!" He really gave the game away when he compared it to Pokemon. "See these two equally fake things? See how they behave in exactly opposite ways?" Pokemon doesn't need to change because it's a story they're sticking to regardless of their lack of existence in reality. So the evolutionary theory keeps shifting slightly for....what reason again? I swear, I keep hearing people mock science for changing and then say "but the Bible never changes" as if that's a victory, and it hurts me that they don't see it. If you started out horribly incorrect, and then didn't change, you STAYED horribly incorrect! And something tells me the Quran hasn't changed all that much over time either.

The smoke alarm in their room is conveying more accurate information than the apologist is

@Nerdiness1985

12 күн бұрын

That's just Allah telling them to shut the fuck up because they are embarrassing even him.

The smugness in their tone while they know absolutely nothing about anything they're talking about hurts to listen to.

@dieudebois296

Ай бұрын

Ok? Ok? Ok? Ok? Yeah?

@designtechdk

Ай бұрын

​@@dieudebois296 I don't wanna go into too much detail. I don't want to pronounce that.

@jdevlin1910

Ай бұрын

Yeah this is it for me as well, it's either this or the dishonesty that makes it equally grating.

@Malakith

Ай бұрын

Dunning Kruger effect in full display.

@mohammadzaarour7949

Ай бұрын

Hey you just described majority of muslims with that statement

Debunking what Darwin said while ignoring all research since then is like saying the first car built is the 1910s is slower than a horse, therefore all modern cars are slower than a horse

@malchir4036

Ай бұрын

Cars are a religion you just want to worship.

@Cheepchipsable

Ай бұрын

It's just cherry picking and misrepresenting statements. The whole "race" thing in Darwin's time just means different characteristics withing the same group. Darwin talks about race in relation to lettuce. Darwin is relatively easy to read, but the later research is hard. I just watched the Paulogia video about Creationist movie where they just flat out lie and when asked "can't quite recall" where they heard it...

@skateboardingjesus4006

Ай бұрын

Their ignorance of transitional species is equally laughable. If they stopped to think about it, they'd realise that transition is a constant process that applies to every organism, both past and present. The dictates of their magic book precludes them doing that, unfortunately. Islam is lame.

@solacedagony1234

Ай бұрын

@@skateboardingjesus4006 Religions that attempt to discredit truth through outright lies are lame. Which is many of them and their followers

@SimpleReally

Ай бұрын

​@@skateboardingjesus4006 big words for someone with 0 proof; you can't explain something from nothing, you can't explain life, you can't explain consciousness, you can't explain language, you can't even begin to try, all you have is bravado

I love how you start sounding completely wasted at about the middle point, but still way more coherent than them.

@fnaffan6999

18 күн бұрын

It’s like instinct for his to debunk creationism at all cause

@random6033

6 күн бұрын

I do like his typical debunks since he's able to completely decimate whoever he's responding to in those, he would actually have time to look through those studies and to in great detail show how they don't agree with them and that they can't read

@fnaffan6999

6 күн бұрын

@@random6033 fair, but it’s also the creationist responsibility to reed the articles and say how it’s supporting creationism

@shreyvarad

4 күн бұрын

educated vs uneducated differential

Dave debunking liars already was gold, but drunk Dave debunking liars is diamond

@fenior

Ай бұрын

Gold is rarer than diamonds

@Solelegendary

27 күн бұрын

@@feniorBut not as beautiful

@balkhss

25 күн бұрын

time will tell who"s liar

@Magnusfication

22 күн бұрын

​@@balkhss no, evidence will/has.

@erneststyczen7071

21 күн бұрын

no they are ugly but make better tools and are closer to bedrock ​@@Solelegendary

Hello, Prof. Dave, I just wanted to say that your inorganic chem videos have greatly helped me prepare for my competitive exams. Much love from India ❤

@shreyvarad

Ай бұрын

word!

@Aengus42

Ай бұрын

Nice one! Bloody good luck with them! 👍☮️😀

@gauravsaimaddipati8356

Ай бұрын

Jee aspirant?

@richardfulop9044

Ай бұрын

Thought you said "ignorant chem videos" 😂

@DragoCyan

Ай бұрын

@@richardfulop9044 i could never 💀

Mr. Farina! DRINK, DRINK, DRINK! (Imagine it with Tour's voice in your head)

@ImagineHeroism

Ай бұрын

The moment I see “Mr. Farina!!!”

@floodsye

Ай бұрын

MR FARINA, DRAW CHEMICALS MAKING UP THAT SCOTCH ON A CHALKBOARD OR ITS NOT REAL !!!

@nicoledigruber8965

Ай бұрын

Hahaha best comment

@zxph

Ай бұрын

Lmaooo

@uncleanunicorn4571

Ай бұрын

​@@floodsye "Phospholipids! clueless!"

The fact the Muslim keeps laughing while he's talking is a psychotic display of nervousness probably due to the fact he doesn't know what he's talking about. 👌

As a Muslim, THANK YOU. I was so embarrassed watching this guy completely fumble and giggle his way through his "arguments" and just generally confuse terms together and not understand anything he's talking about. I'm so grateful that you had the courtesy to say something nice about our tradition, and I just wanna say that your videos are so informative and helpful for me as someone who is actually trying to learn.

@cameronhesketh6814

7 күн бұрын

As a Muslim, you must be in 2 minds.

@emoritzi

7 күн бұрын

What a Wholesome and heartwarming comment😊

@mahjoubadam1742

7 күн бұрын

As a muslim you should be ashamed

@VulcanFlamma

7 күн бұрын

@@cameronhesketh6814 why do you think that? I can confirm that I'm perfectly happy and confident in my choices and I don't think there are any discrepancies between my faith and my pursuit in academia. Muslims have contributed greatly in various academic fields and fostered scientific research and philosophy for centuries. Unfortunately, however, uneducated, uncultured individuals tend to make the loudest noise. But I know you wouldn't fall for that, would you?

@VulcanFlamma

7 күн бұрын

@@emoritzi Thank you. Kind words like these are very sweet and encouraging. Trust me, we're humble and hardworking people. This little obnoxious goblin giggler doesn't represent any but himself. I appreciate all this content that is being put out by the awesome science community, and will do my best to pass it onwards.

I'm one of those 5 that have been begging for this debunk. Thank you for destroying these creationists, Dave. Much love from Iceland! 🥳

@jcnot9712

Ай бұрын

Unrelated, but are there a lot of Muslims in Iceland?

@lynxthewise7233

Ай бұрын

From what I've read they're secular / Christian, but religion isn't a dominant force. @@jcnot9712

@jamesnite2157

Ай бұрын

@@jcnot9712 Around 1500 (0.4%)

@rembrandt972ify

Ай бұрын

Everyone in Iceland loves Dave.

@vone2438

Ай бұрын

@@jcnot9712 not really but creationism is very popular here and they're outsourced from places like the middle east too

Dude, these guys are imagining that A SINGLE GIRAFFE evolved-that one giraffe grew a longer neck. That’s what they’re imagining.

@Nothingseen

Ай бұрын

A good tip for creationists, or for any conspiratorial thinking: if they express incredulity at something and you're baffled by it, they're probably imagining the dumbest possible way to interpret it.

@nagranoth_

Ай бұрын

they think lamarkian evolution and the actual theory are the same thing. Creationists never argue the real point.

@emidowdarrow

Ай бұрын

Yup. Similarly, I think that creationists seek to discredit Darwin and pounce upon any errors in his seminal works not just because it’s an easier target but because they believe science works the same way as religion: I.e. foundational texts are gospel, and proving them erroneous makes any later research incorrect by default. By extension, any changes or disagreements within the scientific community discredits all scientific claims because this is how it works in faith. A religious passage cannot be later determined incorrect without undermining the entire belief system.

@MrUnl0rd

Ай бұрын

Exactly. It's almost like imagining that the ubiquitous use of candles switched to LED lighting overnight.

@insouciantFox

Ай бұрын

​@@nagranoth_even lamarck said this happened over a few generations... this is adaptation

5 minutes in - "I'll make it simple for you". Meaning "I'll omit everything that might not align perfectly with the message I want you to believe is the perfect truth". And the bright smile that he has in his voice shows the joy he has because he knows he will get the audience into believing whatever he says.

They say, "Ignorance is bliss." The creationist has a goofy smile through the entire video. Professor Dave is increasingly frustrated. I guess They were right.

@deadytm

17 күн бұрын

i literally thought of *that* phrase when i started watching this video. 😹 i thought, "ignorance is bliss? i will make sure to prove it wrong if i ever meet this dude in person" (by debating professionally, of course).

@Nava9380

13 күн бұрын

I wish I was ignorant of apologists.

@Abaha-wq8hq

12 күн бұрын

@@deadytm you can join his live stream q&a on the weekends for questions

@nbpgamr2607

11 күн бұрын

​@@deadytm you can join his live stream on Muslim lantern youtube channel

@rifaiyassine98

11 күн бұрын

Professor dave is not even a professor he's a high school teacher that's how dumb you guys are for learning from a scammer Lol

That guy says “okay” every three words and yet at no point did he say anything that could remotely be described as being “okay”

@MCXpress

Ай бұрын

Right?

@mijjies3279

Ай бұрын

And than giggles like a child when nothing he said at any point was remotely humorous

@JasonHenderson

Ай бұрын

Ya heard

@LucidFlight

29 күн бұрын

Right? OK. Hahaha! Moving on.

@bassmit7

21 күн бұрын

Yeah, that bothers me too. But not just that 😅

The bit about burden shifting at the start reminds me why apologists are so fond of oral debates: It’s a way of judoflipping the sophistication of the model and the abundance of evidence from asset to liability. In essence: “I missed a year of high school; teach it to me now. And calculus too while you’re at it.” It’s not a reasonable place to begin a conversation in realtime.

@ashraf5151

Ай бұрын

well said

@John.0z

Ай бұрын

Except this pair seem to have missed more than just a year of high school.

@foxybohv7732

Ай бұрын

It's like walking up stairs essentially. You can learn bit by bit, step by step. Or you can do what creationists want you to do, and make great leaps to the top. Why would I explain atp synthesis when you don't understand punette squares?

@Minisynapse

Ай бұрын

Well said. Oftentimes when someone ignorant tries to debate, the knowledgeable side often gets the feeling that to even begin to debunk their claims would require an overwhelmingly deep dive to the very basics. It's hard to even articulate "where should I even begin", because of the awareness of the amount of basic knowledge required to make the ignorant side understand why they're wrong.

@SupremeGrand-MasterAzrael

24 күн бұрын

@@Minisynapse "Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" lmfao

I had already sent an email to Forrest Valkai about this video so that he could debunk it. Finally it will no longer be necessary you did an excellent job professor Dave

@utes5532

10 күн бұрын

Oh man, Forrest could probably go on about this video for 6+ hours

These two bros need to remember the term "willful ignorance". It's basically when you actually don't want to know or learn something. Especially if it conflicts with your worldview.

@badgoat666

8 күн бұрын

The cognitive dissonance is strong in them 😅

Responding to Muslim creationism/science denial is sorely needed, thank you. The funniest example I saw was when Hamza Tzortis, a Muslim apologist said that embryology worked in X order. He didn't know the person he was talking to was an embryologist, who corrected him and said it worked in Y order. Hamza then, I shit you not, said, "well the word that's used in the Qur'an for describing the process could actually mean that too! So I'm still right!!" It's crazy.

@ImagineHeroism

Ай бұрын

Hamza logic is wild man…

@solacedagony1234

Ай бұрын

Interpretation is one of religion's super powers.

@DavisJ-ln6fw

Ай бұрын

Remind Hamza Tzortis that those evil heathen Greek understood embryology a few thousand years before his so called divinely inspire fanfic was written

@vladimirazubcekova7727

Ай бұрын

@@solacedagony1234more like their only power

@achooothanks

Ай бұрын

I remember that, it was with PZ Myers I believe. Just goes to show it's impossible to reason with someone who's made up their mind or whose livelihood depends on said beliefs.

So glad you didn't do the "Take a shot every time they strawman/misrepresent, lie, say something stupid/wrong" thing... you'd be dead before the first 5 minute.

@designtechdk

Ай бұрын

*5 seconds

@jacobdad2742

Ай бұрын

Right, alcohol poisoning would've been inevitable.

@shreyvarad

4 күн бұрын

he would not be awake to present if he did that, and this is assuming he had like Irish level of tolerance

Muslim apologetics today are about 40 years behind Christian apologetics. Christian apologetics today are at least 20 years behind the high school science textbooks. High school science textbooks tend to be at least five to 10 years behind anything becoming a consensus in the particular field of science. So, we're looking at arguments that are around 70 years out of date. No wonder this video is 3+ hours. Good luck 😅

@nemanjalazarevic9249

7 күн бұрын

Aw come on... 70 years? That implies they were good arguments at one point(they aren't)

@charlestrulear6873

4 күн бұрын

That, and just plain Brandolini's Law.

Them claiming echolocation in bats and whales is the same shows how clueless they are.

Simplest concept of evolution: EVERY species is a transitional species.

@ihatespam2

Ай бұрын

Species is a label of convenience. But the literal minded, can’t cope.

@user-dx1qv4yz5i

Ай бұрын

From what did we originally transition from? And how did it get there?(personal questions)

@Nick-Nasti

Ай бұрын

@@user-dx1qv4yz5i Investigate "Abiogenesis". While it is not complete, it gets us most of the way there and progressing farther every day.

@drhexagonapus

Ай бұрын

@@user-dx1qv4yz5i we transitioned from previous forms, and it got there through the same mechanisms as everything else: natural selection. If you're asking how it all got started its not entirely known, but we do have several potential explanations for how inorganic chemistry leads to organic chemistry and eventually self-replicating molecules.

@ihatespam2

Ай бұрын

@@user-dx1qv4yz5i google it. We are the offspring of hominids, members of the ape family of primates. We are mammals, we are related to every living thing. We look and act like apes and our dna matches, it’s just a fact.

Pseudoscience methodology 1. Set up strawman of science 2.. Have no testable model and claims of your own 3. Move goal posts 4. Deliberately misunderstand evidence 5. Personal incredulity And repeat

@am45_001

Ай бұрын

And most importantly, project all that onto science and scientists

@mursuhillo242

10 күн бұрын

@@am45_001 Also "AlLaÄä"heave sound"aeäh"

@mihailmilev9909

9 күн бұрын

​@@mursuhillo242lol wut?

They think giraffes are Pokémon lol😂

@fnaffan6999

18 күн бұрын

Yeah! And you don’t?😂 creationist are off their rocker

@DavisJ-ln6fw

16 күн бұрын

@@fnaffan6999 No they are nothing like Pokemon

@fnaffan6999

16 күн бұрын

@@DavisJ-ln6fw yeah I’m aware of that

@shreyvarad

4 күн бұрын

imagine. OH MY GOSH! that girafarig species turned into a farigiraf over the span of millions of years! ThAt'S cRaZy!!!

These guys tried pulling the "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence" while completely forgetting this quote debunks their whole religion.

Can’t tell which is worse on their end, the microphone quality or their arguments. Now you just need to find a Jewish Creationist to debunk and you’ll have a trinity of Abrahamic Dropouts

@greyideasthetheliopurodon4640

Ай бұрын

There is a Jewish member of the DI who once called Dave Antisemetic. That one will be really fun.

@eddieray

Ай бұрын

I am glad Dave decreased the video's volume.

@Nothingseen

Ай бұрын

It's 2007 youtube over in the Muslim creationist sphere

@shlokhoms8081

Ай бұрын

As a ex religious jew i really want to see it happening.... except islam, Judaism is one of the most toxic religions to be in, i have so many mental problems because of Judaism.

@mjjoe76

Ай бұрын

Maybe David Gottlieb. Dapper Dinosaur covered him recently. Mr. Gottlieb was on par with James Tour in terms of being a shouty-angry man who didn’t bother to learn about the things he was trying to debunk.

Drunk Dave is still reassuringly smart

@paulslund1

Ай бұрын

He's still orders of magnitude smarter while drunk than these guys.. or likely most of us! 😁

@Psi34ax

Ай бұрын

He knows a lot about the science stufffff, Drunkard Dave Explains!

@southernbrain691

Ай бұрын

​@@Psi34ax😂you made me laugh like a toddler!

Damn Dave, you really sat through all of this bull and keep it more civil than I'd expect. I've watched it in entirety and I appreciate the hard work you put into this...

Thoroughly enjoying drunk Dave debunk. Maybe this should be your title for these, D3.

8:20 - "If a Darwinist cones up to me..." If a Darwinist comes up to you, I'd be shocked. For the most part, there aren't any Darwinists walking around today. Science has moved on from mere Darwinism. Nobody who engages seriously in that discipline would call themselves that anymore. Welcome to the 21st century, we'd love to have you, but you can't seem to get through the door.

@berniethekiwidragon4382

Ай бұрын

What they don't get is, while Darwin (and the oft unmentioned Wallace) were instrumental in establishing the theory of evolution, we have since moved away from what he thought at the time.

@NewNecro

Ай бұрын

​@@berniethekiwidragon4382 It didn't have a clear explanation to trait inheritance until genetics so it's not like we moved away but rather improved its foundations. Even then, early on there were scientists (Thanks Lysenko, who wasn't even one) who vehemently opposed genetics which made Neo-darwinism a necessary designation of synthesis of natural selection with genetics.

The sheer fact that this man can drink hard alcohol and still take down apologetics is amazing, what a legend

@shreyvarad

Ай бұрын

just goes to show, that even a man slurring his words can prove evolution!

@jamesmaybrick2001

Ай бұрын

Hard alcohol? Just scotch. What we in England call "just a drink". But more to the point a brain damaged chimpanzee could debunk muslim apologetics. Honestly, as a whole they seem so much more stupid than the christian nuts. I suspect that deep down the average christian creotard knows he is spouting shite, but needs to keep the grift gong, but the average muslim version actually believes it.

@b_f_d_d

Ай бұрын

​@@shreyvaradFacts

@DR-JOHN-DEJAVU-1984

Ай бұрын

Greetings Helldiver

@carlosm7232

Ай бұрын

Yea he can handle his alcohol 😂

Water isn't wet. Water makes other things wet. He falls down on his first claim of what a fact is.

@mythicalducky

Ай бұрын

There's actually an argument on that one. I personally agree with you but I've heard tons of arguments about it so he lost about that too

@mactallica9293

Ай бұрын

​@mythicalducky I believe it just stands at, it depends how you define wet

@billymanilli

Ай бұрын

When Chuck Norris jumps into a pool, he doesn't get wet... The water gets Chuck Norrised.

@Richard_Nickerson

24 күн бұрын

I had this exact thought immediately as well

@bassmit7

21 күн бұрын

I was thinking that 😅

24:45 I believe he is referring to Lamarckian evolution, which was the idea that organisms would pass on physical changes that occurred during their lifetime; the common example being a giraffe stretching its neck to reach higher leaves, and somehow this constant physical stretching results in the offspring having longer necks.

@JaceDeanLove

14 күн бұрын

Wasn’t that a belief that Nazis used to justify their bigotry?

@phobosex7504

Күн бұрын

He thinks it happened in a single giraffe. Thats what he said atleast. One giraffe stretches its neck and grows 6 inches

@bgeniij

Күн бұрын

@@phobosex7504 Well, technically he didn't say HE thinks that; he was actually mocking the idea. But he was trying to act like Lamarckian evolution was some sort of mainstream idea that represents the field of evolutionary biology, even though we've known it isn't true for over a hundred years.

2:25:00 I checked the last 2 papers for funzies. The 77% one says "For about 23% of our genome, we share no IMMEDIATE genetic ancestry with our closest living relative, the chimpanzee. This encompasses genes and exons to the same extent as intergenic regions. We conclude that about 1/3 of our genes started to evolve as human-specific lineages before the differentiation of human, chimps, and gorillas took place." It does not say that our genome has a 23% difference in the genome but that those 23% started to evolve alongside chimps but before we split from them... The last one is from "Institute for Creation Research" so it's to be disregarded.

@JB-xc7mw

Ай бұрын

I didn't click on the last link, but I'm sure that the 70% are from creationist Jeffrey Tomkins, who posted this result originally on Answers in Genesis. Later, people tried to reproduce his result and realized that his comparison has a lot of flaws and a buggy BLAST version. Tomkins himself even admitted this after much hesitation.

@HeathOgden

Ай бұрын

Dave. I am a molecular evolutionary biologist and phylogenetic systematist and you are spot on. They are just so ignorant. I would be happy to look into any of their specific claims if you want a more precise debunk.

@machineman8388

7 күн бұрын

​@@HeathOgdenyou should man, would be interesting to hear, or see a video on. I'd watch it

As a former member of this cult I appreciate you doing this Professor Dave

@KarldorisLambley

Ай бұрын

i realise these lads were tossers, but i dont think using their idiocy to suggest 'islam is bad' is fair. scientology is a cult, the moonies were a cult, i dont think the main religions are. i think they are all incomprehensibly odd, but not cults.

@Irosicndosjnf

Ай бұрын

Glad you’re doing better

@alexanderingraham8255

Ай бұрын

I have to ask… are you the Gman who argues (argued?) for creationism in KZread??

@TheMagnificentGman

Ай бұрын

@@alexanderingraham8255 na that's not me.

@TheMagnificentGman

Ай бұрын

@@Irosicndosjnf thanks I appreciate it

Admittedly, I don't spend as much time looking at Muslim apologetics as I do for Christians, but they just seem... much less sophisticated in their argumentation?

@hmu05366

Ай бұрын

Yeh much lower levels of intelligence

@utes5532

10 күн бұрын

Muslim apologists tend to have the religious arrogance cranked up to 11 in my experience

@godofmath1039

9 күн бұрын

Either way, both groups are less than human

@user-cz1mz3pp9n

8 күн бұрын

@@godofmath1039 ew

@godofmath1039

8 күн бұрын

@@user-cz1mz3pp9n I know, right? They are indeed very sickening

The DNA insertion and deletion section blew my mind, you can really tell they took a 1 minute cursory glance at the wikipedia article and completely misunderstood what those words mean

1:47:50 This is what is written in the article he shows: "The new finding does not disprove or discredit the theory of evolution, and the researchers said randomness still plays a big role in mutations. But the study does show that these genetic alterations are more complex than scientists previously believed." Either this guy hasn't read the full article or has deliberately chosen not to show this.

@DanielMWJ

Ай бұрын

Or he's stupid and doesn't understand words good.

@cspahn3221

26 күн бұрын

Probably the ladder. They admitted to deliberately trying to influence people to believe in their magic sky daddy.

This is my favorite episode of Drunk History ever.

@user-vm3dd4yd2l

Ай бұрын

1:03:00 😂😂

that kent hooving impersonation was so good lmao. I think you should take a break from debunking videos though, you seem to not be very happy while doing them. But if I am wrong and you do enjoy making these videos then you should keep making them

The irony of them claiming biologists manipulate facts to confirm their "beliefs" is girthy

There is no stronger confidence than confidence of a fool.

Speaking of the Giraffe neck it was absolutely not a perfect evolution, and a good example of random beneficial mutation. If I remember correctly there is a nerve in their neck that loops down their neck and back up to their skull making a massive detour, that is not a perfect adaptation. Thats an example of a random mutation of an existing system where the neck grew longer and the other biology just adapted to it and did not redesign itself into a perfect system.

@enlacostaizquierda

Ай бұрын

The recurrent laryngeal nerve. Worked fine in our distant fishy ancestors but once we developed necks in the Devonian and Carboniferous not so much. Also the valves in the blood vessels in their necks are easily explained by similar valves in their (and our) legs. Evolution found a way to adapt like it always does.

@Akiva279.

Ай бұрын

@@enlacostaizquierda yes thank you for that I couldn't think of the name.

@bassmit7

20 күн бұрын

Correct. It's the "Vagus" nerve. Giraffes btw have the exact same number of neck vertebrae as all other mammals, with 2 exceptions. There's always exceptions 😅

@duncanbrown4184

9 күн бұрын

I just got to this point. This is too painful to go on. I have to stop. Fly free professor Dave, and kudos for being able to sit through this bunkum.

as a student finishing his graduate studies in evolutionary genomics I had a good laugh with this one... especially the section on genomics (around 2hr mark) thanks for sharing this Dave!

@TheLizardWizard17

Ай бұрын

buddy doesnt know what DNA is, what genes are and pretends to know what Junk DNA is... Junk DNA, such as satellite DNA are important sequences for the structural part of the DNA without being transcribed into genes... For examples, Telomeres, Centromeres

Thank you for bringing up these evidence(s) :p Awesome video!

Man, I love when creationists reference Pokemon when it comes to evolution, because Pokemon evolution is so clearly how they think actual evolution works.

@McCarthyJohn100

Ай бұрын

I never thought about that, but it's absolutely true for many of them. In their minds, chimps leveled up one day and evolved instantaneously to a human. Many don't even acknowledge that there's a common ancestor, and we didn't evolve from modern apes.

@fostena

Ай бұрын

Funnily enough, in recent years Pokemon introduced realistic examples of "actually evolved" Pokemons: the Alola variants.

@ivanpetrov5255

Ай бұрын

Someone did the math on pokemon evolution - it's basically a biological WMD.

@casualnerd4615

25 күн бұрын

​@@fostenaThey also introduced the split evolution lines. Where exposing a pokemon to two different sets of conditions yields a different evolution. Eevee is the premier example. But things like Poliwhirl or Kirlia can evolve into Poliwrath or Politoad or Gardevoir or Gallade.

@casualnerd4615

25 күн бұрын

​@McCarthyJohn100 I dunno what you're talking about. My parents threw a moonstone at a bird and it turned into me.

8:21 "Darwinist" holy shit, I know what's about to happen here

@l0rf

Ай бұрын

Because to them, science is like their religion so if someone were to disprove the existence of Mohamed the prophet, it would destroy Islam. Hence, if you disprove what Darwin said, you can ignore 160 years of science since then.

I'm relatively new to this channel, ive seen a few videos here and there and i was just watching your video on Hubble expanding universe, doppler effect, the redshift and something prompted me to check out more of your stuff and im glad i did- I thoroughly enjoyed this video, had a really fun time. Thank you for making your content. You're amazing P.S. Can't wait to check out the James Tour videos!

@elsawithginathedreamdragon3952

Ай бұрын

Dude, the James Tour Videos are an experience in-and-of-themselves…it’s both very entertaining and educational! Enjoy the trip. 😆

Islamic apologetics are quite literally the worst ideas in the world. 😂

vestigial ≠ useless When will creationists finally understand this?

@DavisJ-ln6fw

Ай бұрын

Vestigial means altered function or reduced function

@enlacostaizquierda

Ай бұрын

As someone else mentioned elsewhere the problem is they confuse and conflate colloquial meanings with scientific terms. It's the "evolution is just a theory" problem all over again.

@jonovens7974

Ай бұрын

They won't.....they can't accept anything, because accepting 1 thing unravels the whole ball of twine.

@rembrandt972ify

Ай бұрын

When pigs fly.

@Fukiyel

Ай бұрын

​​​@@rembrandt972ifyYeah, and God knows that would take *-at least-* an additional few millions years of evolution... :')

My girlfriend and I bonded through your videos. Thanks man.

@mjjoe76

Ай бұрын

Unexpected wholesomeness in the comments. Thanks! 😁

@Yourwaifuisntreal

Ай бұрын

Congrats, man!

@silvaskiproductions3937

Ай бұрын

did you guys get it on with professor Dave playing in the background?

@kieri_6345

Ай бұрын

@@silvaskiproductions3937 Obviously? Nothing to set the mood better than Professor Dave grilling the ever-loving hell out of pseudoscience.

@narendrakadam3894

29 күн бұрын

His silky smooth voice as he debunks creationists just turns on both of us. Nothing like a collage lecture while you are doing it to set the mood.😂

This is highly entertaining, but I'm glad you don't do these drunk debunks very often. We need you around.

Hey Dave, quick correction, small point: marsupials do have placentas, and some actually have just as complex placentas as eutherians (which is why a lot of marsupial researchers prefer the term eutherian rather than placental). The difference is in the time course of gestation and lactation, not in the presence/absence of a placenta (along with a bunch of other differences that are more obscure and less well known). Actually there's evidence for placentation in other viviparous squamates as well, so it's not even a uniquely mammalian trait. Kathleen K Smith has a great book chapter on the evolution of placentation in mammals that goes over the evidence in marsupials that will come up if you google her name and placentation.

The fact that they need to attack works from over a century ago is VERY telling of where they're operating from.

@Cheepchipsable

Ай бұрын

Typical apologist tactics.

@BoogieBoogsForever

Ай бұрын

I agree.

@martin2289

Ай бұрын

They're just recycling trash arguments and outdated bullshit from Christian Creationists that have been exhaustively debunked.

@SimpleReally

Ай бұрын

It's honestly more telling of you that you think an idea loses value just because time has passed.

@FrikInCasualMode

Ай бұрын

@@SimpleReally No one implied that.

It's so strange, every time a creationist talks about the absence of transitional fossils I immediately hear yodeling.

@ijustwanttolikecomments4677

Ай бұрын

SciManDan style yodeling by chance? lol

@Nidair

Ай бұрын

@@ijustwanttolikecomments4677 More like Dapper Dinosaur style yodeling

@GamesPlayer1337

Ай бұрын

Whenever i hear that i think about the Futurama scene where the Ape prof doesnt believe in evolution because of a "missing link". And my reaction is always the same Prof Farnsworth has: "I dont want to live on this planet anymore." lol

@nagranoth_

Ай бұрын

I'm seriously starting to have a love/hate relationship with Dapper Dinosaur, the bastard plays the entire thing every time.

@acewing3889

Ай бұрын

ok then, where are the transitional fossils?

I'm Italian and I have had a lot of fun with this and your other video. Thank you professor Dave (I'm studying chemistry at the University to become a little bit as intelligent as you)

Watching you get drunk in real time is the best science experiment I've seen in a long time.

3+ hours? I have assignments due this weekend damnit!!

@lachlaninfield37

Ай бұрын

not anymore!! :D

@ianchisholm5756

Ай бұрын

I'm a uni teacher marking a pile of essays - this is just what I need to get me through it!

@stathamspeacoat

Ай бұрын

Maybe do what I am doing and open Word and randomly add/remove punctuation while you have this video on. I also made my bibliography and title page 😆

@Menemen98

Ай бұрын

Prepare for the assignment youll watch the video later lol.

@Cheepchipsable

Ай бұрын

You realise there is a pause button, yes?

At about 1 hour. The arguments from the creationists sounds to me arguing that since we found out that PI isn't 3.1415926535897932384626434, it's actually 3.14159265358979323846264338, then PI doesn't exist.

There can be no doubt that laughing too much has an effect on the Muslim’s heart and distracts him from thinking deeply and fearing Allaah.

Hi there Dave, i really like to see growth of your channel up to about 3 milion subscribers and i want to say that you deserve much more, you are doing an amazing job and i wish you the best my dude....And a loooot of patience with debunking idiocy

"the theory of gravity, fact or fiction" "the theory of germs, fact or fiction" This is the same as questioning the theory of evolution

@user-dx1qv4yz5i

Ай бұрын

Um akchually 🤓 gravity is considered a Law and not a theory(sorry had to correct you)

@i2keepitrealInreseach

Ай бұрын

​@@user-dx1qv4yz5i Theory of gravity as per Einstein.. The law is just talking about rules and not mechanism about how gravity works...

@DavisJ-ln6fw

Ай бұрын

@@user-dx1qv4yz5i Gravity is a Theory and a Law The theory talks about the mechanisms The law simply states the rules and their conditions

@user-dx1qv4yz5i

Ай бұрын

@@DavisJ-ln6fw the guy above has already corrected me, thank you tho

@cyberyousef7519

Ай бұрын

Germs and gravity aren’t theories because you can see germs and gravity will force you to believe in it Evolution on the other hand is a fairytale

Sees video.. 3+ hours.. hmm.. clears schedule.. grabs coffee.. "Press play"

@enlacostaizquierda

Ай бұрын

Just over a hundred minutes in and I need another coffee.. might need an Irish coffee at this point.

@enlacostaizquierda

Ай бұрын

At 2h 24m.. "and their father's father's father" and he stopped.. apparently he could go no father.

@zeendaniels5809

Ай бұрын

Soda and popcorn for me, please...

@kieronparr3403

Ай бұрын

Tbh I thought I'd watch ten minutes, I can't stop listening to these clowns. I wish they would have a debate.

@enlacostaizquierda

Ай бұрын

@@zeendaniels5809 Where I live it was about 8 AM when I started watching.. if you do go for the soda make it caffeinated.. you're going to need it. And maybe some "liquid courage" as well.

I love this by the end prof Dave face shows how over he is with these people and the slightest drunk slur makes it so great reminds me of my uncles talks at family gatherings they were both scientists and they would argue or as they call them family debate but they be drunk and it was so entertaining and loud lol

I love drunk Professor Dave!

My favorite part is that they first claim evolutionary theory is false because it's unfalsifiable, but also claim that it's falsified by gradualism being untrue. It can't be both. Then their explanation is: God did it. The most unfalsifiable claim you can possibly have.

@Cheepchipsable

Ай бұрын

Or "scientists are making stuff up.." Then using other scientific papers to "prove" it.

@etherealmistlc

Ай бұрын

​@Cheepchipsable careful, that sounds like circular reasoning! 😮😂

@Aksarallah

11 күн бұрын

@@Cheepchipsable the amount of bs they create to prove human evolution is crazy, its like flat earthers all over

It's incredibly painful to witness such overconfident ignorance. He also arrogantly laughs all the time like an idiot. I couldn't bear to watch it to the end.

@--atheist

Ай бұрын

It's a religious things

@chrisdistant9040

Ай бұрын

You’re looking at it wrong. I seen them laugh at science, I laugh at them not having a single clue what they are even talking about. Their confidence is just the cherry on top 🤦‍♂️😄

The giraffe bit, around 26 minutes, sounded like they were confusing Lamarck's theory of the transmutation of species where a giraffe would stretch and it's offspring would have longer necks as a result as having anything to do with darwin's theory or current theory.

I am reminded of a quote by Dawkins (if I recall correctly): It’s like if playing chess against a pigeon and the pigeon knocks over the pieces, craps on the board, and declares to the other pigeons that it won

Biologists: "Here is all the evidence for evolution: The fossil record including tons of transitional species, phylogeny & anatomy, genetics(DNA), embryology(EVO-DEVO), molecular biology, chemistry, and much much more. Not to mention, DIRECT OBSERVATION!" Creationists: wave their hands and say, "That doesn't prove a thing!"

@page8301

Ай бұрын

But don't you know, they have a book, and it proves EVERYTHING! ;-)

@kajsorensen1207

Ай бұрын

@@page8301when people quote scripture to me, I quote the lord of the rings to them.

@YEY0806

17 күн бұрын

​@kajsorensen1207 "everyone should praise the true prophet, GANDALF!!"

@kajsorensen1207

17 күн бұрын

@@YEY0806 Tom Bonbadil is true god

@thychozwart2451

Күн бұрын

​@@kajsorensen1207 As one should. It's the superior fiction.

Drunk Dave debunk? Hell yes

Just love watching you stick it to these peddlers of misinformation. Hope you get to see London mate, bring some sunny weather with you if you can. Ttfn!

I Love how dave just casually debunked everything so rapidly like he don't even need to look up the literature! Love from paksitan ❤

The baboon bone in Lucy's neck was quite literally already hypothesized in the original paper as it didn't seem to fit 100%. To then turn around and state it as if it's this magic discovery that debunkes evilution!!!!! is hilarious

@woundedone

Ай бұрын

The people who examined Lucy was already like "Hmm 🤔 this bone looks odd and we're not sure it was from the same skeleton". Guess they're CLUELESS heh? The irony of creationists try to debunk scientists with science will never stop being funny. 😂

I wonder if they giggle as much at the claim that Mohamed rode a horse to the moon.

@thecatattheend2250

Ай бұрын

They say that shit with a straight face, and mean it. It's absurd.

@ColinJarrett

Ай бұрын

Or that he Married a 6 year old girl...however, the Prophet was a gentleman and waited until she was 9 to consummate.

@kenbee1957

Ай бұрын

Of course not That is supernatural and therefore, science

@rababrahman9478

Ай бұрын

No he (SAW) Didn't. Al-Isrā’ wa al-Miʿrāj has been thoroughly documented, with over 20 Companions narrating this event. The reports of al-Isrā’ wa al-Miʿrāj alone outweigh the reports of the rest of the Meccan era combined. However, the researcher is tasked with differentiating fact from fiction, as grandiose stories attract storytellers, and al-Isrā’ wa al-Miʿrāj is the most magnificent story of all. As with any event, reports on the topic are assessed to distinguish the most authentic narrations. The researcher must also compare interpretations; some believe that al-Isrā’ wa al-Miʿrāj was a dream, or that the Prophet travelled in spirit, but that is not the case. As a bona fide miracle from Allah, the Prophet physically journeyed-in a state of wakefulness-from Mecca to Jerusalem, and then to the Heavens and back, within a single night. There is a difference of opinion as to when al-Isrā’ wa al-Miʿrāj took place. However, there are some indications. ʿĀ’ishah narrated, “Khadījah died before the prayer became obligatory.”302 This is definitive proof that al-Isrā’ wa al-Miʿrāj took place within the last 18 months of the Meccan era because the prayer was made obligatory in al-Miʿrāj. The day, or even month, of the event is unknown, and any specified date is not authentically narrated. It is yet another indication that the Companions did not place great emphasis on the dates and anniversaries of major events; they focused on the substance of the events rather than commemorating its existence. The Prophet was sleeping at home when Jibrīl arrived and took him to the Ḥaṭīmi to pray two units (rakʿāt) of prayer. The Prophet narrated. “Jibrīl opened up my chest and brought a bowl made of gold filled with Zamzam.ii He took out my heart, washed it, and put it back.”305 This is the second time that Jibrīl washed the Prophet’s heart, however on this occasion he did not need to remove a black spot. Nevertheless, his heart needed to be washed with Zamzam to prepare it for the overwhelmingly awe-inspiring sights to come. As Allah stated, “He certainly saw some of his Lord’s greatest signs.”306 It was through Allah’s divine intervention and special facilitation that the Prophet was able to traverse into the Heavens without being subjected to any of the physical laws of this world.307 The Prophet continued, “Jibrīl then brought me a beast, smaller than a mule but bigger than a donkey, pure white, called al-Burāq. Each of its strides is as far as the eye can see.” The word “burāq” stems from the root word “barq” which means “lightning”, denoting its lightning speed. However, al-Burāq is a physical animal, created of flesh and blood, not a spiritual creature. There are no authentically narrated reports about a winged horse. Al-Burāq had a harness and saddle, and Jibrīl held the harness as the Prophet mounted. Al-Burāq neighed, and Jibrīl tugged the harness, saying, “Woe to you! Are you not shy? By Allah, no-one has ridden you that is more blessed in the eyes of Allah than your current rider!”308 The Prophet continued, “I rode al-Burāq and he took me to al-Aqsa Mosque. I tied al-Burāq to the animal posts used by the Prophets, and I entered and prayed two units of prayer.” Source: From "The Sirah of the Prophet (pbuh): An Original and Contemporary Analysis" By Yasir Qadhi, 2023

@honed7150

Ай бұрын

@@ColinJarrett honestly this one of the more dubious claims of the hadith because of how much modern islamic scholars rely on them without using historical context as a muslim i moved away from alot of that narrative

Giraffe necks gradually getting longer over long periods of time? *Impossible!* An invisible man who spoke everything into existence? *Makes perfect sense.*

Always a great sign when a debate begins with defining truth/reality/fact/proof. Can already tell we're in for a lot of great evidence.

Gotta love a Dave debunk Friday to listen to on the drive home from work

@3nd1ess77

Ай бұрын

Damn, how long is your commute? The video is 3 hours! ROFL

@Blops2diamondz

Ай бұрын

@@3nd1ess77 only an hour haha, I'm still listening to it!

@silvaskiproductions3937

18 күн бұрын

did you make it home safely?

@Blops2diamondz

18 күн бұрын

@@silvaskiproductions3937 Through the laughter yes

When creationists like these talk, I am reminded of people saying that parrots are just copying the sounds and don't really grasp the meanings. They so often misuse words and concepts in ways that make it clear they are just making mouth sounds and don't actually understand the words they are making. The creationists I mean, I actually suspect parrots to be more intelligent.

@davidhand9721

Ай бұрын

That's as profound as it is terrifying.

@KBird204

Ай бұрын

As a bird keeper, can confirm

@aidanmatthewgalea7761

25 күн бұрын

they can associate some words with certain behaviors and objects and even a few somewhat abstract concepts like a proto understanding of it, but yeah they're marginally smarter than mr Snelling

@Charity4Orphans

21 күн бұрын

😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 I don’t even think they could win this argument. If a parrot can learn to open their cage, and get away from them for being stupid.

Gotta have a buzz on to listen to these people Dave my dude! 😅

Really good job Dave. Btw I don't know if you ve noticed but that hist Sub oor Ahmad is on the first video of Discovery Institute in your list speaking to Luscin

25:22 the Kent Hovind impression was spot on

Using Lamarck's ideas on giraffes as a gotcha for biologists is just as asinine as pretending there's nothing in psychology post-Freud.

1:40:23 hearing Dave say this in a tipsy state was just so satisfying… genuine disbelief is palpable… well said.

The sequel I've been waiting for

My affection for Dave grew 10x when he brought that Laphroaig bottle into frame

@redmurder1572

Ай бұрын

Laphraig is indeed not for the faint of heart. I was happy to see it too.

@christophersandford5888

Ай бұрын

Exactly the kind of morally bankrupt stiff I would expect an EVILutionist to drink. See him trying to drink whisky without admitting in his heart that the true God's whisky is Jack Daniel's! Foolish infidel you deny the truth in your apostasy! /SARCASM/

I want more Drunk Debunks. 3 hours... absolutely great. Even a little tipsy, being able to pick apart con men that attempt and succeed at tricking people just shows how important, and useful, an actual good education can benefit you.

@jaygee6447

Ай бұрын

Drunk Debunk is an epic title 😅

3:10:30 Dave’s reaction here to the speil about confidence is golden.

Finally! You're responding to Suboor Ahmad. I was wondering when you'd get to him.

I respect the effort trying to debunk detailed scientific arguments when their alternative hypothesis is 'Big Daddy magicked animals into reality'.

@John.0z

Ай бұрын

And their "god on earth" married a child. A great role model that one. They also consider him to be utterly unquestionable.

@alexeypolevoybass

Ай бұрын

@@John.0z try studying Islam, you'll probably shit your pants while reading their sacred literature.

@John.0z

Ай бұрын

@@alexeypolevoybass Thank for the suggestion, but no, I am good without torturing myself that way. I am lucky that I worked out that religion was BS at a very early age, and I had an environment where that was OK. In many countries that realisation would be fatal.

The fact that Dave, clearly tipsy, can elucidate these creationist ramblings debunking each and every point with incredible accuracy is just a wonderful illustration of how ludicrous these said ramblings actually are.

You were right, they're playing all the hits in this one. Can't they come up with any new arguments?

@fnaffan6999

18 күн бұрын

Nop, why would they? They can repeat to their hearts content and no one’s listening except for themselves

😂 to all the muslims crying and coping here for a debate after seeing Subbhor and muslim lantern being humiliated, go watch the kent hovind vs prof dave debate. Kent hovind is stupid but he's smarter than Subbhor. Dave destroyed kent hovind Now imagine what he would do to subbhor lol

@WorkholiHelio

20 күн бұрын

True.. They don't watch videos Just come to the comments Then cope and seethe "dEbATe hiM" lmfao

@Mo.king7

11 күн бұрын

imagine calling yourself prof and you're not. and stop peddling asininities and learn before talking rather than fangirling another man

@OmniTranscend

11 күн бұрын

Subhoor has challenged Dave to a debate. Do you think Dave will accept?

@OmniTranscend

11 күн бұрын

@@allysnipes3908 I just watched his Dave's debate with James Tour. I know i shouldn't presume by label but surely there's no way an academic professor would not explain the science, support his argument constructively instead throw personal attacks.., really disappointing from Dave. Surely it damages the whole principle of objective scientific discourse.

@nullunullu7990

11 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂 it's hard for me to see someone coming out and say that i am from chimpanzee🤦🤦

perfect, time to put this on, take a nap and rewatch it

@alpacapunch9238

Ай бұрын

(repeat)

@verdantvixen96

Ай бұрын

We really do all live the same life, don’t we?

@Killbayne

Ай бұрын

finished my nap and I'm not even halfway through

@Killbayne

Ай бұрын

had another nap and I'm still only 2 hours and 19 mins in

@johnjahn7482

26 күн бұрын

@@verdantvixen96 Sure we do. I don't know why but Dave debunks gives me a happy and calm sensation to go to sleep.

3 hours??! Lets go dave, this one should last me until your next video comes out

Cheers! How else is winding down from their day and having a drink with Dave!

Drunk Dave is so f*cking amazing. How is he this smart after Scotch? Dude, this is divine, no pun intended. Please do these more often.