Time to redo this video 1. CC 2. PB 3. Brink 4. Cardoso 5.Reese 6. HVL 7. Johnson

@zulu1520

Ай бұрын

Funny how times changes thing HVL might have dropped even further than 7th

Cardoso domnated Reese in the USA vs Brazil games!!!

@politicallil7060

8 ай бұрын

So what you act like Reese is not undersized and that Brazil didn't have a pro team.

@shakimmthibou100

8 ай бұрын

I bet reese don't win rookie of the when she enters the wnba

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

If Reese gets an outside shot then she will be next level. TBD

@RichardIILionheart

8 ай бұрын

@@back2sports988 That strikes me as an awfully big IF.

@ReadR00ster1

8 ай бұрын

It wasn't just Reese, she shut down both Reese and Betts.

1. Clark 2. Brink 3. Reese 4. Bueckers 5. Cardoso 6. HVL 7. Johnson And my rankings can change depending on this season. Bueckers can easily get back to #2.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

Or 1

@giizodamulla7492

7 ай бұрын

​@@back2sports988😬 I don't know. Clark is out of her mind right now

@violetforpb

7 ай бұрын

@@giizodamulla7492 we don’t know what Paige is capable of as a junior. Tho she proved why she’s no.1 in her sophomore year and even led her team to the championship game. Caitlin had an amazing junior season but I think it’s unfair to compare both when we couldn’t see what Paige could do, although, Paige did has better stats her sophomore year compared to Clark’s junior year

@giizodamulla7492

7 ай бұрын

@@violetforpb Its not that I don't think Paige is Great,I just personally think right now Clark is playing at a level that has been rarely seen in college so I agree with anyone who argues another player is better.Even during Paige's POY season as a freshman, Clark averaged more points, rebounds and assists

@violetforpb

7 ай бұрын

@@giizodamulla7492 as a freshmen, Paige had better percentages. Which shows much more improvements to the player’s game. If a player takes more shots, she has the opportunity to score more (caitlin). Paige was selfless and shared the ball very efficiently. When you’re surrounded by good shooters, you aren’t forced to shot unless you have to (paige). If were also talking about stats, turnovers are a huge problem for caitlin, she definitely improved. and she’s definitely number 1 currently.

Reese just needs to develop an outside shot. She’s undersized but she’s definitely up there

How in the hell did you leave Paige Bueckers off the list! She is the GENERATIONAL talent. She is the only player on this list with two Final Four appearances and a consensus Player of the Year! She has accomplished more than anyone on this list while playing at the premier program.

@letchism

8 ай бұрын

He had Paige in 5th place and explained the reasons why...which made a lot of sense.

@turtleislandlac1490

7 ай бұрын

Sounds like he's basing it on their accomplishments in college but talent wise, Paige should still be up there. Problem is when you play on a UConn team loaded with elite recruits you get scrutinized more than other stars.

@djdoc06

6 ай бұрын

coming off an ACL is a huge thing. Gotta see how she does now after injury. Hope she comes back to prior form, but no guarantee.

Kamilla Cardoso is number TWO, from a WNBA draft perspective. DOMINANT. She is the one I would draft Second (#2), just behind Caitlin Clark.

I like your ranking and Im looking forward to seeing how everyone improves this season! 🏀

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

Me too!

First off I'm a huge fan of Paige. But I think you gave a fair rating to all these talented ladies. That being said, I hope Paige will stay healthy and return to form. It had to been hard to rank them. Thank you for doing a job that will get you flamed. Go UConn.

@politicallil7060

8 ай бұрын

Nonsense, his list is bias you can't discount a championship if statistics are not far removed.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

@allanlouk9164 you are much to rational and reasoned for youtube comments. You need to get some at @politiciallil7060 into you and realise that my list is bias and that my list is not just about a fun re-ranking of the 2020 class but has much deeper culture significance which will impact the culture and world we live in for years to come.

As a Notre Dame fan I preferred Clark back then over Bueckers. I didn't know then how great Caitlin was going to be, I just liked her smooth style with the basketball. Followed her recruiting for years and was gutted to learn that before committing to Iowa, Caitlin was a "soft" Notre Dame commit which was revealed by Monika Czinano in an interview two years ago.

@back2sports988

7 ай бұрын

Wow that would have change things up a bit if she would have gone to ND

@turtleislandlac1490

7 ай бұрын

@@back2sports988 Yes for sure. I think going to Iowa was probably better for her, because with the talent ND has she would have been limited offensively. But can't help but think multiple National Championships would have been possible for her at ND knowing what we know now.

@RichardII_Lionheart

7 ай бұрын

@@turtleislandlac1490 My impression is that Caitlin is happiest when there is a personal challenge to be met. She wanted the keys to the kingdom, and Iowa was willing to hand them over after Caitlin convinced them the Hawkeyes could make the Final Four with her scoring and passing from the point. It would have been different at Notre Dame or most other traditionally powerhouse programs. Would Caitlin have played at Notre Dame? Absolutely. Would she have been a star player? Again, absolutely yes. But she would have had more constraints on her; she might well have chafed under those constraints.

@turtleislandlac1490

7 ай бұрын

@@RichardII_Lionheart Yes I know. Already saw what happened to Caitlin when she played with other talented players with Team USA U19 squad in 2021. She led the team in scoring but wasn't in the same rhythm and shot 38%. My thought was that Caitlin would eventually adjust to playing with the talent she had at Notre Dame. Actually ND's players in the 2020 class would have complemented her well. Problem with giving Caitlin the keys is she needs players that suit her style, and last year's Iowa team fit her perfectly. I'm not sure they have the same talent this year, but keeping an open mind. I think that's partly why the top transfers didn't come to Iowa, they knew they'd have to take a backseat to Caitlin.

@RichardII_Lionheart

7 ай бұрын

@@turtleislandlac1490 I don't think Caitlin has any problem having very talented players as teammates. It's just that her teammates would need to do more adapting to her than the other way around, and that could be a problem initially. She would likely have a problem with coaching that tried to constrain her playing style too much. She wants that green light to improvise, including shooting logo threes and attempting what, at least for anyone else, look like very difficult passes. I agree that the 2022-2023 Iowa team had players who complemented Caitlin well. Czinano could be up and down depending on the opposition, but she scored 18 against South Carolina in the Final Four, mostly on direct assists from Caitlin, and played offensively almost to perfection. Having the same players start more than 90 games together over three years was a definite benefit for Iowa. Obviously I was not privy to any transfer portal decisions, but it is difficult for me to think that it was Caitlin's presence that really deterred anyone from transferring to Iowa. I thought there were a couple of possibilities early on. A player like Lexi Donarski could have helped Iowa defensively while keeping a solid offensive threat, but she would not have added size or rebounding. I acknowledge the possibility that, having played three years with Ashley Joens at Iowa State, Donarski might have preferred not to transfer to Iowa where Caitlin's star would definitively have outshone Lexi's even more than Ashley's had I suspect she might have been interested leaving the Midwest or in studying a particular graduate field of study, but could not find any actual information about what that field might be. As for post players in the portal, there are a couple of things I do not understand. First, Jan Jensen is reputed to be the nation's best coach of post players, and has the resume to back that up. Why would a post player not want to be coached by her? Second, having watched Czinano put up excellent statistics for three seasons playing with Caitlin, why would a post player not want to be on the receiving end of Caitlin's passes? I heard somewhere that Lisa Bluder said Iowa went after a couple of players, but after those players committed somewhere else, no one was left in the portal that the Iowa coaches thought was better than their returning players.

Did you say Kim is the best coach in college basketball? Geno is what? Number 283?

@allanlouk9164

8 ай бұрын

Kim is the best coach. If you don't believe me just ask Kim. Lol.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

If you are an LSU fan, hell yes you think she is the best coach in college basketball.

I respect your opinions it’s good to have people discussing women’s basketball. That being said it’s - 1. Clark 2. Bueckers 3. Brink 4. Reese 5. Cardoso 6. Van Lith 7. Johnson happy to elaborate if you want

@matthewreese3907

8 ай бұрын

Completely agree. While I don't think it's likely, Bueckers could pass Clark. Cardoso could also pass Reese.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

I like you but or however. Your comment is very fair. I think i am looking more at impact on a program. Stanford and UConn are like the Yanks in the day. they will win regardless. I feel Reese and HVL helped take their programs to a new level.

@chiefs816kc

8 ай бұрын

Yes, please elaborate.

@letchism

8 ай бұрын

Angel Reese is in 2nd.. Led LSU to NCC title. Brink is a quality player, but lets get facts right Angel Reese had better stats. I like Paige..but second place, when she did not play any Basketball last season is Wild lol

@JMonty-nb5un

8 ай бұрын

@@matthewreese3907 totally agree! I think if there are any changes in this it’ll be swap Bueckers and Clark and swap Cardoso and Reese

I just have a problem with Paige Beuckers being ranked on your list as #5, I would have it lower. I do not project anything, which is what I think you are doing. Two injury-plagued years do not give her #5. I love Paige, but I have to be fair about it, and I am not even sure if I am being fair as maybe she should go as low as #7 until we see what happens this year. If you can make the statement at the end of the season you may take your #2 pick and end up ranking her #1 you could rank Paige #7 and do the same at the end of the year.

1. Clark 2. Reese 3. Bueckers 4.Brink 5. HVL 6. Cardoso 7. Johnson

I like this list. But Kelly, edwards and powpow is better. Should’ve done top 10. 10. Johnson 9. Deja Kelly 8. Powpow 7. Edwards 6. Cardosa 5. Brink 4. HVL 3. Bueckers 2. Reese 1. Clark

I honestly don´t care if Clark goes #1 or #2, I just want her to be a good fit for whatever team chooses her. Despite the loss, I´m proud of her because in these 3 years we saw progress, after devastating losses like Uconn, Creighton, Maryland, etc, she matured a lot and did not force shots again like previews games. The only reason they made to the final game was because she learned from the Creighton game, it was the exact same script in the Georgia game and she came back in the second half and was an efficient playmaker willing to pass the ball, same thing in the Colorado game. That said, I feel like Bueckers x Clark is just like Shawn Jonhson x Nastia Liukin in 2008: they have similar skill set but with different styles, everyone has a personal preference. Like It was in 2008 this will go down as to who can peak at the right time. Reese is great and is a special marketing talent too, everybody talks about Clark and Bueckers being the face of the WNBA in the future but my money is on her. I bet even Beyonce will talk about her some day :D

@Paul15.

8 ай бұрын

Reese would be a good women's wrestler. It fits her style and ego. Also, would make more money

1. Clark, 2. Cardoso, 3. Reese, 4. Brink, 5. Van Lith, 6. Bueckers, 7. Johnson

@chiefs816kc

8 ай бұрын

No way Bueckers is #6. She is the only player on the list with two Final Fours and a Player of the Year.

@mplou699

8 ай бұрын

and NO natty...@@chiefs816kc

Bro how did Elizabeth Kitley from Virginia Tech not even come close to making this list she's dang 20 pts 10 rebs her whole career and she has size at 6'6 and she's won back to back ACC player of the year and that's no easy feat the ACC ain't no joke the shade Virginia Tech continues to get even after making a final four is ridiculous 🙄🙄

@back2sports988

7 ай бұрын

Kitley was in the 2019 class and ranked #33. The Video was re ranking the top 7 from the 2020 class. BUT - watch this video I think you will like it much better kzread.info/dash/bejne/aa1nzpuYXcnZo5s.html

You need to do more reseat. First Cardozo dominated Reese both times she played her. In college and World Cup games where Cardozo lead Brazil to the gold. Second Dawn Staley is the best coach! Period!!!

@back2sports988

6 ай бұрын

Fair Point. This will likely make your blood boil - Wooden Award - Reese +400 , Cardoso +1500

You ought to redo this,

Your reasons for promoting Van Lith are ridiculous, unsupported by her numbers through three seasons. Aside from free throws, her shooting percentages are mediocre. She has more turnovers than assists.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

Agree , PB number are better but you need to be on the court to have an impact. 1.5 years not enough. Having an impact at UConn is winning championships.

@RichardIILionheart

8 ай бұрын

@@back2sports988 I am just saying that Van Lith by the eye test often looks better than she does on the stat sheet. She is an offensive threat, of course, and can score in streaks, but then disappear.

Reese can only shoot layups. Bueckers and Clark are 1 and 2 . Clark has the lead because of Bueckers injuries. 3rd Brink. 4th Cordosa 5th Edwards 6th Reese 7th Van Lith. How can you put Diamond Johnson on the list? Edwards will be drafted in the top six barring injury. Any GM in the WNBA would have Edwards in the top 6

@JMonty-nb5un

8 ай бұрын

He’s talking strictly about those who were ranked top 7 coming out of high school and evaluating where they are now

@Paul15.

8 ай бұрын

I get it. But, if someone moves ahead of 1 or more of these players they deserve at least a mention. Hopefully they all stay healthy.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

thanks - yes was a pure ranking of top 7 from 2020

@Coachjay3

8 ай бұрын

“Only layups” git a national championship and avg 23 and 16. So come again?

@Paul15.

8 ай бұрын

​@Coachjay3 How did she do this summer? Also the championship was won when she was on the bench. The yellow haired girl was the hero!

Caitlin Clark can do it all! And she doesn’t get hurt! Ever! Caitlin #1

Te-Hina PaoPao (POW POW) is Top Ten.

Espn's mock draft has put reese as the number 8 prospect in this year's draft. What is your response to this, you fanboy?

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

Well fanboy thinks - If she gets a mid range shot and is able to extend it out to 3pt range then she will better than Brink. And I really like Brink. If not then she will be a wnba version of Draymond which is ok as well.

@shakimmthibou100

8 ай бұрын

@back2sports988 You are crazy. Your opinions are exceptional, but you have no idea what you are talking about.. Angel reese is not that good. She will be mediocre in the wnba. She won't win rookie of the year. She lacks great post moves and the footwork.. she is not better than aliyah boston and Cam'ron brink..you are high my friend

@ms.peaches1

8 ай бұрын

​@@shakimmthibou100Seems like you have a personal beef with Angel. 😂😂😂😂 Just keep watching from your couch! 😂😂

@shakimmthibou100

8 ай бұрын

@ms.b237 of course, it's my favorite option but when the ncaa tournament starts, Angel will get sent home and will watch the game from the same place which is her couch

LOL, aged like really really bad wine. HVL isn't even looking like an WNBA draft, Paige is looking like the first pick in the WNBA draft. (btw, I'm from a small school Washington past so really like HVL, plus I'm not a UConn fan).

@back2sports988

Ай бұрын

I think it is ok

My friend, you left out one important factor when evaluating players. Let me begin my statement by asking you, "Do you know who Angelina Jordan is?" She is a young singer who is on the verge of becoming a HUGE international star. Vocally and artistically she is on a level which puts her at 'the top of the class'. But what separates her from the field is 'who she is'. Suffice to say, if you give her a listen you will understand what I mean. Paige can do it all, score, distribute the ball, destroy any press from the opposition, rebound and on and on. I do understand you are playing a 'wait and see' game to see if Paige is physically ready to resume a brilliant career. BUT, there's something else going on. Like Angelina, IT'S 'WHO SHE IS'! Paige is basketball. And she has a heart of gold and a deep concern for everything that is going on around her. When a player on the opposing team looks at Paige before the opening tap she is looking at much more than a player with all the tools. Angelina and Paige have very different careers but they have so much in common in regards to 'WHO THEY ARE' !!!!!!

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

Agenlina who? is she Michael's daughter? ok Top 5 women singers 1 Whitney, 2 Adele 3 Taylor Swift 4 Celine Dion 5 agelina Jordan. I have know idea who she is but believe in your robert!

@RichardIILionheart

7 ай бұрын

Whenever Caitlin Clark steps on a basketball court to play an NCAA game, she knows she is the best player there. So does everyone else. That does not mean other players are not outstanding in their own right. A healthy Paige certainly is outstanding. But better than Caitlin after three seasons of college ball? No. She has a lot to prove in that regard.

@RobertDeMartin

7 ай бұрын

Talk to you during March Madness! Should be interesting. @@RichardIILionheart

@RichardIILionheart

7 ай бұрын

@@RobertDeMartin It will be interesting long before March Madness. I would hope you can agree that Caitlin Clark exemplifies every positive you (correctly) attribute to Paige: score, distribute the ball, destroy any press, rebound. Clark’s only negative on offense is she commits too many turnovers. And even then, her assist-to-turnover ratio was 2.07 last season, which ranked her 45th in the country.

@RobertDeMartin

7 ай бұрын

Agreed. What it comes down to, I believe, is the personality of both players. One player is entirely the focus of the team's energy. The other player is so incorporated into including all the other members of the team into the flow of the game they are on their toes at every moment knowing they may be called on at any time. Example: With the game on the line and time for one more shot, one player will shoot no matter where she is and what the defense is. The other player will also want to shoot in that situation but in a flash will dish off to someone alone under the basket for an easy score. Richard, I enjoy the regular season games as much as the Tournament games in March. Somewhere along the line I fell in love with Women's basketball at the college level. To watch the game played BELOW THE RIM is beautiful and the young ladies play a much more sophisticated game then ever before. @@RichardIILionheart

Let’s see freshman year take your team to the final four! Sophomore year take your team to the national championship! That’s not a better résumé than HVL!

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

Not at UConn it is not. Making a final 4 is expected as a minimum.

If I was going just on pure talent. 1. Beuckers 2. Clark 3. Brink 4. Reese 5. Van Lith 6. Cardoso. 7. Johnson.

@giizodamulla7492

7 ай бұрын

There's zero validity to any lists without Clark at 1

@RichardIILionheart

7 ай бұрын

What is “pure talent” for you? The term has little meaning unless linked to performance.

@giizodamulla7492

7 ай бұрын

@@RichardIILionheart Watch any Iowa game in March Madness, you'll find your answer

@RichardIILionheart

7 ай бұрын

@@giizodamulla7492 Do you have a disagreement with me? If so, I don’t see what it is. I have watched quite a lot of women’s college basketball over the years, especially over the past three years. I have not seen another female player whose performances have as much impact as Clark’s.

@violetforpb

7 ай бұрын

⁠@@RichardIILionheartPaige won all awards she was eligible for as a freshmen (including player of the year - first ever), mind you, she was the only freshmen in HISTORY to do that and the first and only one. She accomplished so much even as a sophomore and led her team to a championship game and final four as a freshmen. If you said Clark is number one I’d have no problems because it makes sense. But saying no one had an Impact as much as Clark????💀 hello?? Please elaborate… Paige is the only player on the list to go through 2 final fours her first two seasons and a championship game.

You answer your own question about Paige. Unfair to compare Paige to manzel as a player being that these times are different. Nil Paige as manzel has none and still struggling with life.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

That was not the point and maybe because I made it badly. The point was did she have a special season her freshman year she will never be able to recapture? She does not have off the field issues, she has health issues.

This is a 2-player race between Clark and Paige. Period. Reese is disqualified because as you said her numbers are ridiculous BUT those come against ridiculous schools. If get your stats against division 3 schools and average numbers against real competition you haven’t demonstrated jack. And look for a repeat of that murkiness since their schedule is worse than their so-called rebuild season. I’d actually rate Brink, Cardoso, and Aaliyah Edwards (who is in this group now) ahead of Reese. Van Lithium is a complimentary piece who should do well in Mulkey’s system where she won’t get all the attention. She’ll still ebb and flow until she can prove she is a game changer. My litmus test for both Reese and HVL is South Carolina. Neither could do anything against SC’s defense while others in this list (Clark, Brink, Bueckers, and Edwards) have thrived. 1) Bueckers 2) Clark, 3) Edwards 4) Cardoso 5) Brink 6) Reese 7) Van Lith -- my opinion for the upcoming season. Diamond Johnson can be an exciting game-changer (more so than HVL even) but she doesn’t have enough games where she was THE big dog. Fault Wes Moore for this but understandably so considering the talent he had. This is probably why she’s taking a step back in order to take a step forward with her more than likely last basketball playing experience. She should enjoy a nice 2-year legacy at Norfolk State.

@politicallil7060

8 ай бұрын

Well if Reese was so sorry why didn't Clark mop her up in the championship game? Clark had plenty of opportunities to defend Reese and the bench warmer Carson who blow her off the floor instead Clark was playing some I hope y'all miss defense by standing around waiting on her turn to shoot. If you hate to the protagonist villain Reese's be honest and just say so don't try to use some scheduling nonsense to justify your reason for trying to say she doesn't belong on the list. She mopped up who she played she not in charge of scheduling which was made while she was at Maryland. Her team only loss to SC and Tennessee in the SEC tournament after mopping them up in the regular season. Cardosa and Boston are bigger than Reese and did not play out of their position. Ain't no two girl race between Clark and Paige neither of which have won a championship and both of which were college players of the year when they got outplayed by undersized guards in national championship games.

@Paul15.

8 ай бұрын

Their scheduling is an embarrassment to all of womens basketball. If they would play 5 of the top 15 ranked teams in their nonconference games they would be so much more respected. It would help bring in more fans and sponsors. TV ratings would go up. There would be more talk going around about womens basketball. More social media scuttlebutt. All positive. What LSU is doing actually hurts the game. How can all these good players on LSU be happy playing cream puffs? Just to pad Reese's stats shooting layups over 6 foot centers I guess.

@chrishosey7535

8 ай бұрын

Clark>Bueckers until further notice.

@ms.peaches1

8 ай бұрын

So you're saying that out of all the games Reese played last season, not one team was a top 10 team?🤔🥴😂So out of the 30 something games they played, you're saying they didn't play ANY top 10 teams?🤔 😂😂 The lies you tell to hate. She played well against most top teams even though they lost 2 games. You're just a hater.😂😂😂 Yes, they played some easy teams,😊 but she STILL got her numbers against the top 10 teams. She had 34 double- doubles, that is not a result of her just playing 34 easy teams. Please stop hating. 😅😂Lmaoooo

@chrishosey7535

8 ай бұрын

@@ms.peaches1 The point is she played noticably worse against top teams.

Your list is not accurate and certainly not based on achievements. Its bias and prejudical but I'd be lying if I said I had an expectation of fairness. You can't discount the fact the Clark and Reese had the exact same plus/minus rating statistically including all advance stats. Clark with this alleged all world shooting only averaged four more points than Reese per game this year. Clark lead the nation in assists, but not in scoring. Reese broke the NCAA double double record rebounding and scoring and had 555 rebounds which you conveniently failed to post any of her stats in your justification of why Clark was placed ahead of Reese on your list. Beating the "best" team in basketball and then getting blown off the floor in the championship game doesn't give you no browie points to negate the actual champion as a significant factor in the rating. Besides Clark who supposed to be a shooting god only scored 8 more points in the championship game than Jasmine Carson who came off the bench to outscore her in the second quarter and the 1st half, not to mention that Alexis Morris an undersized point guard dropped 19 in the second half leading LSU to out score Clark in both halves. You can't discount Reese championship run and the fact she was MOP of the tournament. The only reason you putting her behind Clark is because of her ethnicity in my opinion. Clark has not changed the women's game but she has given it the awakening it needs to grow but not without the protagonist villain people have assigned to Reese. Reese has brought the most visibility to the game using her marketing prowess off the court by relating every opportunity to the women's game. Reeses has brought in the most sought after consumer base the hip hop culture and casual sports fans, not just more X's and O's sports fans like Clark. Even her appearance in the Lotto music remix with Cardi B two of the biggest rap artists on the planet was significant in marketing attention to the women's the game. As far as Clark xhanging the game UConn had plenty of lights out shooters in its hay day and players who won 4 chips in a row. Clark hasn't done that every campaign of her college years. Shooting wise Diana Turasi is still the lights out shooter of this century in women's college basketball. You act like Clark is something brand new she actually is not. Finally Paige would be at the top of your list because of her superb freshmen campaign which ended in her losing a national championship to SC with a 5'7 guard who mopped her up dropping 26 points in the championship game. You give Clark and Paige credit and excuses when they lose and then discount people who look like Reese when they win despite the fact that it was a Reese led team that beat your selected number one player. To discount or minimize Reese's accomplishments is absurd. Your list is reflective of dishonest journalism and failure to state and do a fair analysis of all of the facts. I see Clark is your fan favorite and adter all this is your list. Geno can make an argument he is the best coach he certainly attracts the best talent but he is doing nothing to market the game in comparison to Kim Mulkey. Kim is alro the fastest coach in history to 600 wins and has won a championship as a coach, assistant goach and player. That's my story and Im sticking with it. Interesting show.😂

@emilymortiboy3526

8 ай бұрын

bro it is not that deep 😭

@RichardIILionheart

8 ай бұрын

Nice rant, but totally unpersuasive.

@Paul15.

8 ай бұрын

I listened until you put race into it. I listened to the Lynx coach comment to her assistant coaches. She said next year's draft would be about Clark and Bueckers if they come out. They can run a team, they can score , and it takes 2 players to stop them. They have the ball in their hands when it matters. Reese can rebound and only shoot layups. She struggles big time against taller players. Guess what. Every WNBA team has at least 3 tall and athletic players. No creampuffs in the W. RACE has got nothing to do with it

@shakimmthibou100

8 ай бұрын

LSU played the weakest schedule last year. You won't put that into your statement

@wessey1000

8 ай бұрын

Angel Reese patted her stats with a bunch of cupcake games! When she played real competition, her stats were pedestrian! It has nothing to do with what she looks like! This is a big copout when people try to go on that route!

What a dumb call.

@back2sports988

8 ай бұрын

which one?