Jake starts speaking: *thinks it's a sponsor segment* Jake continues speaking: *wait maybe-* *Oh, never-mind*

@Dindonmasker

4 жыл бұрын

Wait really?? I completely skipped that part XD

@PlanetCalvin

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I'd probably like Jake more if he had anything else to say, but they gotta pay the bills.

@hypersapien

4 жыл бұрын

@@PlanetCalvin I miss the days when the videos paid the bills and there was less reliance on merch and sponsors

@S0Nerdi

4 жыл бұрын

yeah i skipped that shit

@Zimited

4 жыл бұрын

Jake has become embedded into my mind now as the annoying sponsor segment guy now. Thanks jake for taking on this burden, but I also feel like I need to see you in more normal settings and not just sponsored segments on the daily series, cause it's really tarnishing the way I feel when I see you cause of the way my brain works.

When you thought Jake wasn't advertising for once

@yerwol

4 жыл бұрын

As soon as he came on screen I thought ".... and here's the promo section, 'whats he selling this time' " 😂😂

@potato-ud6yv

4 жыл бұрын

i thought it was a part of the vid too when i didn't see the ad countdown upper third. bamboozled me

@MasterCrumble

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe this is rude to say, but every time I see Jake, I get this instinct to skip forward to 2 mins. D: I just cannot survive listening to the ads dialogue.

@eduardoADSL

4 жыл бұрын

But he is right, why don't you buy it to see for yourself?

@markrudyi

4 жыл бұрын

@@eduardoADSL, is secretly Jake trying to sell the buds in the comment section.

Kinda thought Jake was gonna say "why can't these cameras have a VPN"

@kumarthecowboy

4 жыл бұрын

close enough

@jst1man

4 жыл бұрын

Next gen buddy!

@prcvl

3 жыл бұрын

Conray is worse than a VPN

Video title: "RANT" Corridor Crew: *politely complains*

@Arovna

4 жыл бұрын

Class

@thewildcardperson

3 жыл бұрын

Ironically more effective

Serious quesiton: Could the reason these features aren't available be related to the generation/age of the consumers using them? The people who can afford $20k cameras might not have a lot of overlap with people who grew up with smart phones and are used to features we find in our smart phones. I went to school for animation, and most of my instructors came from the generation of Tex Avery and Looney Tunes. They would actively discourage students from doing anything 'anime style'. My roommate ignored them, and strictly did things in an anime style, and was continuously criticized for it. She ended up getting hired before even graduating, and today a majority of modern animation has influences that come from anime. I can envision a similar thing happening in the camera industry- as people like yourselves start replacing the older generation of filmmakers, the industry will have to adapt and provide the products you want.

@SkillBeatz

4 жыл бұрын

Also the generation of people who decide what makes onto the market and what doesn't, I guess.

@inund8

4 жыл бұрын

Ok, but what about decent Autofocus and integrated SteadXP?

@arch758

4 жыл бұрын

weeb.

@danilooliveira6580

4 жыл бұрын

@@inund8 I would say its because those are cameras designed to be used with manual focus, not auto focus. but if that was the case then there wouldn't be auto focus at all. so maybe..

@omelettedufromage2676

4 жыл бұрын

Inquisitor Shu rich weeb

I miss jake talking about being a lawyer and stuff, so sad that he only does the ad skit now :(

@QuestionMarkOHai

4 жыл бұрын

He is doing law stuff though.... the law of surviving on youtube

@ArifRWinandar

4 жыл бұрын

What about that time when he prosecuted Niko?

@LittleRainGames

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah and when they did 3d printinf projects.

@YaburuRunyaru

4 жыл бұрын

well I mean, that's what he did before the lawyer stuff, and that didn't even really come up that often... relative to how many total videos they've made with him in it that is

@silastoppe1936

4 жыл бұрын

I miss Man vs. Flood

What I'm hearing is that GoPro needs a professional line.

@deaconbluezz

4 жыл бұрын

GoProPro

@dandagle2629

3 жыл бұрын

ProGo

@burntham8752

3 жыл бұрын

Progopro

@AdamM2807

2 жыл бұрын

So go pro with pro gopro and be a pro

Imagine Jake being hired by a brand for a legit tv ad, and becoming very famous as the face of a product. This would be funny.

Title: Includes "Rant." Thumbnail: Includes Niko. Me: Oh, this should be fun.

4 жыл бұрын

Haha I had the same reaction 😂

I find it strange that most camera don't have the ability to take a clear image or record clear footage of me

@pnarimani6055

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah crappy cameras. lol.

@marinusprimus7785

4 жыл бұрын

Tbf, you dont exist :)

@Flyssac

4 жыл бұрын

I have a theory that you actually have the power to control camera and video quality.

@curious.511

4 жыл бұрын

Are u ob Facebook ? We can chat!!?

@memento81

4 жыл бұрын

To me cameras actually seem to get worse. I always used to get clear pictures of me. But ever since I watched that stupid artsy indi short film about that weirdo pale girl in the well five days ago, all footage of my face is super blurry. I think I'll give it another week. If the problem hasn't solved itself by then I am really gonna look into this.

5 years ago: Phones will never be as good as a decent DSLR Now: My phone can do it, my go pro can do it, WHY CAN'T MY CINEMA CAMERA DO IT >:(

@jensenraylight8011

4 жыл бұрын

Even my dog can do it too >:(

@MarVandeSande

4 жыл бұрын

My Samsung phone records better 4k 50fps video then my EPIC-W.....

@Cosmitzian

4 жыл бұрын

@@MarVandeSande Thing about it is, 'better' applies to 80% of what you'd care about. It's the extra 20% that you do care about that makes the difference between 'your phone' and a dedicated thing.

@ErebosGR

4 жыл бұрын

"My tractor can plow my farm. My truck can pull my boat. Why can't my Ferrari do it all?" That's how y'all sound.

@Defiring

4 жыл бұрын

@@ErebosGR This analogy doesn't work here at all... This would be more like: "My Peugeot 206 can do it, why can't my Tesla truck do it?"

Jake: Why can't these cameras build you a premium website?

@NessaOfDorthonion

4 жыл бұрын

Tricky

@anonymousanimal5179

4 жыл бұрын

With award winning customer service?

When you thought Jake actually had a thoughtful critique on making it easier to monitor audio while filming....

@theninjamaster67

4 жыл бұрын

i mean he kinda did since wren talked about not being able to hook up wireless headphones for audio monitoring and that's what the sponsor spot was

@thepjup4507

4 жыл бұрын

ive gotten used to just instantly skipping ahead any time he appears.

@readyforlol

4 жыл бұрын

@@theninjamaster67 Even Wren's part felt kind of forced to just plug their sponsors one more time.

@QueeferSutherlands

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah i really miss his side plots and shit. Not just being used as the funny ad guy

@thepjup4507

4 жыл бұрын

@@QueeferSutherlands "funny ad guy" is extremely generous, you're a sweetheart.

"this thing could run crysis practically but yet can't focus" omg best freaking line in the rant! that game melted my laptop

@NitishKumar-yc9qp

4 жыл бұрын

I paused the video and start finding comment like this ,LOL

"It is the year 2020. There's not a better time to be alive-" Wh- "if you're an independent filmmaker." They had us in the first half, ngl

@outdoordad1656

4 жыл бұрын

It is a great time to be alive!

@thealphas1

4 жыл бұрын

Still right tho, what other time was better

@inr9751

4 жыл бұрын

@thealphas1 The time before the coronavirus.

@agaveboy

3 жыл бұрын

@@inr9751 haha

@MonroeRepublic

3 жыл бұрын

@@inr9751 you not wrong tho

Jake: It's 2020 . . . Me: Ah sh*t, here we go again.

I miss the magic lantern feature that let you put a big red "not filming" logo on your screen, so you always new instantly if you where not rolling

@rykkamaddox3803

4 жыл бұрын

God that sounds amazing. We have a PA that is very good at keeping track of the sounds that occasionally responds by shouting "NO YOU ARE NOT" when the camera person says 'rolling' out of sync. They are magic. But that feature would be amazing.

As an engineer that works in this arena of camera development I can answer some of these questions. 1. Image stabilization: The large FOV of the gopro and the smaller file format makes stabilization easier because shot to shot image noise is harder to see and there is less information to be concerned with corrupting. In addition these factors also mean that stabilization processing requires less processing power and less battery power. My guess is the majority of the effort is getting high speed quality high dynamic range images and imbedding the sensors and data acquisition might be different enough to the core electronics that it isn’t easy to do. What you are asking may sound simple, but so is saying, just simulate photo realistic virtual rivers. 2. Auto focus is a matter image processing, and in order to make it function requires image processing very early on in the sensor readout analysis. The challenge here isn’t likely the processing power to do it, but more likely that it is where in the sensor/data architecture can the hardware and the software analyze the data to make the focus changes. The issue here maybe that it requires a complete hardware architecture change, and the core electronics likely cost millions to develop alone and they are likely waiting to launch an update after the engineering cost invested is returned in profits. The hold back on high speed/high rez cameras is likely the architecture and image processing to do all of the stuff you want. 3. Wireless monitoring, the issue is usually interference, lag, and transmitter regulations… the challenge is likely that the big high quality camera companies don’t have the expertise to develop the IP to do it. 4. The challenge with Bluetooth is always meeting the Bluetooth regulations and cost to be able to market the product with any of the many Bluetooth compatibility regulations. 5. Camera position sensors is likely just a low demand requirement. The short answers is that embedding the technology likely requires a complete electronic and software redesign from the ground up. The demand from the companies is likely low especially with modular solutions available in the market.

@ErebosGR

4 жыл бұрын

Niko sounded like the typical entitled internet commenter who doesn't understand how engineering, manufacturing or economies of scale work.

@evotech

4 жыл бұрын

@@ErebosGR You have to have people who just don't care anything about that in order to push innovation. It's great that users come out and are honest about what they want.

@AdamKuzniar

4 жыл бұрын

I agree - it's not that those things can't be done, it's that they can't be done at a level that's close to perfect and nothing else is acceptable for high-end productions. 1. There's a fuckton of artifacts and issues with stabilization like GoPro and dont even get me started on getting it working on longer focal lengths 2. Auto focus is great but most of the prime, cinema glass is.. manual. So what if the camera has great AF if 90% of it's users won't use it. 3. I don't know how recently he used it with the GoPro but my experience is that it takes a ton of time to connect, it drops the connection a lot, the quality isn't there, the range is abysmal. None of that can happen on a professional set. 4. The issue with wireless monitoring is that you're introducing another variable into the mix. What if you hear the audio going bad - you don't know if thats your headphones running low on battery, connection getting bad or maybe the bluetooth codec is struggling ? Wired connection has none of that. 5. Once again - in the example with iPhone you can clearly see the dragon isn't sticking to the desk, it's slightly moving around. Could you imagine seeing that on a big screen in a cinema? Everyone would say it's a sloppy VFX job and it would be!

@jensenraylight8011

4 жыл бұрын

​@@ErebosGR but he had a good point though because it's really a pain in the *ss, it's unnecessary and wasting a lot of time, it's not that you need to be a Supreme Master Engineer to suggest a change to make film making less painful yeah if the Company really hate other people suggestion and have a stubborn boomer attitude, guess what, don't complain and get angry if there a new shiny company suddenly enter the market and blow the competition out of the water, pushing the boundary forward

@prestonyarger5169

4 жыл бұрын

@@ErebosGR Niko always sounds like he knows what he's talking about when he doesn't.

"This is 2020, it's the best time to be alive for independent filmmakers..." 😬 famous February words Niko

My take: Wow. I had no idea Red's autofocus was that f'ing shoddy.

@xKouhai

4 жыл бұрын

yo fucking same

@teyo5693

4 жыл бұрын

@@Zizos same

@B.B.Digital_Forest

4 жыл бұрын

That's why the film crew has a focus puller.

@Artyomthewalrus

4 жыл бұрын

It's the audience it's aimed at. It's generally a safe assumption that any high end cinema camera won't have good autofocus (and many don't have autofocus at all). It's assumed that it will be used in high end productions where focus needs to be perfect so the team will have a dedicated focus puller regardless - it isn't really aimed at run and gun solo filmmakers. I honestly didn't even know red had autofocus.

Sam: “What really burns my biscuits...” *I’m using that now*

@robertvantine2810

4 жыл бұрын

Yosemite Sam: "Identity theft is a crime, Jim!"

@randyblekitas

4 жыл бұрын

Josiah Smith you never heard that before? 🤨

@josiahsmith7250

4 жыл бұрын

Randy Blekitas not exactly a phrase I grew up with. Sounds like something you’d here in the South, more often.

Here's my theory: High-end Cinema cameras are tools created for an industry that in many ways hasn't changed for decades. In contrast "lower end Cinema cameras" are tools being created for a different market demographic. the former is still very much set in their ways whereas the latter demands new tech and new innovation be available to them in order to produce their work. That's why you see better features on "lower end Cinema cameras", and the high-end cameras are basically $20,000 brains that don't do much.

@samik83

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah. If you're using a high-end cinema camera, I think they pretty much expect you to do everything in post. A working auto-focus though...really odd that they just half-assed it like that.

@anti0918

4 жыл бұрын

It's about numbers. Very few people are buying expensive high-end cameras. So while the cameras may cost $20,000 each, you only have a few hundred people buying them. Consumer cameras are only a few hundred dollars, but you have tens or hundreds of millions of people buying them. That's where the money is, so that's where the competition goes, so that's where the most innovation happens.

@dominikhaberstock

4 жыл бұрын

@@anti0918 Yes and especially RED is in a very difficult spot. Compared to ARRI they are a "Budget" Option in some way, but also defiantly not a high volume Product. So in short they rarely end up on high end sets, unless its special FX heavy, and there aren't enough MKBHD´s in the world to drive the Price down. Anyway im quite the fan of the new Canon C500 Mark 2, I think for the first time Canon didn't completely criple the camera to save the higher end C700.

@andyfilms

4 жыл бұрын

This is exactly it. If you mention autofocus on a cinema camera, people freak and say things like “Autofocus has no place on a professional film set!” It’s an industry that’s over 100 year old, so very few people actually consider to question *why* they think autofocus can’t be a professional tool, they just regurgitate that it’s not.

@majoritarian7864

4 жыл бұрын

Andyfilms, High end film sets will almost certainly never use auto focus, and not because they like to stay in the past, but because autofocus is less reliable, harder to program in, and will never have the same smooth perfect transition that focus pulling does.

My eyes could not have rolled any harder upon realizing Jake's part was yet again an ad

@samwarren6008

4 жыл бұрын

You'd be like that even if it was someone else that always did the adds. It's not his fault.

The Wren autofocus trials were so cute hahaha i might need those in gif form

@octobermoon3959

4 жыл бұрын

Yes! Wren is adorable!! 😂

The next Corridor Crew video: "We engineer the perfect camera... again."

@ninjawhippetproductions7411

4 жыл бұрын

The even perfecter camera

Why does this feel exactly like the Linus tech tips video complaining about lack of included red features that corridor brutally tore apart like 2 years ago...

@JediS1138

4 жыл бұрын

Ketchupsandvich LOL Right?? Exactly what I thought as well 😆

@randomgaming6808

4 жыл бұрын

Oh how the times are a changin, but at the same time Linus was more destroying the idea that you have to pay separately for these highly expensive components. This is more of like bruh this shit already is out there why cant I do it with this.

@gamongames

4 жыл бұрын

Idk about you, but I think filmmakers know professional cameras a bit more than a tech youtuber.

@Excludos

4 жыл бұрын

@@gamongames Yeah, Linus doesn't really use his cameras! He only makes consistently high quality youtube videos and has his own film crew. What does he know?

@Excludos

4 жыл бұрын

My first thought was exactly this. I will say tho that the corridor crew from 2 years ago are completely different from today. Their videos are much better and a lot less sensational. They seem to have grown up a little bit. I enjoy them a lot more these days.

I flipped this on 3 months later than the upload. "The year is 2020, it's the best year for independent film makers!" Oh boy do we have a surprise for you...

@ColeyDuncan

3 жыл бұрын

Oh yes they do. Unfortunately, I'm from 3 months in your future, and the surprises just keep on coming. But fall is just right around the corner, so there's that.

Jon Favreau used VR while “filming” The Lion King.

@alexmilo

4 жыл бұрын

Samu Tyrväinen yes? It was. Just lackluster to most because we had already seen the story. Had nothing to do with the out of this world visuals done for the film.

@adamogilvie9382

4 жыл бұрын

@Samu Tyrväinen movie itself was absolute crap. The VFX work was pretty much groundbreaking (also i BELIEVE jon favreau used the same thing on The Mandalorian)

@Engineer_Who

4 жыл бұрын

You mean he stuck a helmet on his head and pretended to make a movie? 'Cuz that's what it felt like.

The biggest problem with cameras is that none of them can give ad reads like Jake

The SECOND Jake got on camera I knew he was gonna swing this into a sponsor ad. Love him

The key word here is "pro", if they added some of these features at the same level of functionality as a smart phone have, they wouldn't be used for anything much at all by the film industry, because they wouldn't be good enough to replace the workflows that are in place already. Maybe autofocus would be useful in some niche cases, but you would never risk autofocus stealing a take by focusing in the wrong spot in a dialogue scene for instance. Human error is definitely a thing in focus pulling, but I'd wager that's the preferred risk to take. 3D tracking could be useful for a quick post-vis mockup, but probably never for production. And the real reason they probably haven't done it is because of all the infinite combinations of lenses and focal distances and lens breathing which all have a unique distortion profile. Phones on the other hand have a known lens, the device knows its distortion exactly which goes into the calculation. Also, there are already pro cameras that can track camera rotation on a per-frame basis, stored in the metadata, so that is potentially useful already, but the workflow for actually extracting it is lacking unless you already built a custom tool for it, which I doubt many have done.

@epiicSpooky

4 жыл бұрын

I think that's a valid point about about AF, and maybe the audio in the case of cameras like RED but not the Black Magic Camera. But accelerometer + gyro data would benefit everyone - even a good optical flow solution would be better with something to sanity check against. RED maybe it makes sense to be a module, but Black Magic & DSLRs should have it built-in by now.

@Kanibulus

4 жыл бұрын

Are you a conformist ?

The cameras are only using specially designed high speed DSP processors for image processing with a small cheap general purpose CPU to handle the interface. It's not only adding the sensor or communications hardware, but probably adding another full CPU and writing an OS to handle management of all components. Basically, to handle all the stuff the crew discussed, you would basically be building a smart phone into the camera, and the camera companies view that prohibitively expensive, even though it would massively improve their customer's workflow. The first who does it though, is probably going to make a massive amount of money,

Gotta say, Jake, that RayCon plug was smooth. But at this point, I expect nothing less of you.

@austynross

4 жыл бұрын

It's like he half did the wireless audio monitoring segment that came just a minute or so later. I feel like he could have just done that legitimate segment and wrapped it in an ad

Honestly, it's impossible to be angry at Jake's sponsored sections because they transition so good and do it in such a fun way.

Also, I don't get why the comments are suddenly ragging on Jake. They need those segments to finance the channel and at least Jake keeps them entertaining!

@movieholic-92

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! I hate ads, but I never skip his sponsored segments because he genuinely cracks me up, I learn about a new product that I go check out, and it doesn't feel like I'm wasting my time.

In defense of manual focus / having a separate person pulling focus... I understand why lower budget projects as well as documentaries would really benefit from quality autofocus, however, with higher end narrative productions, the focus puller is as much a part of the storytelling as the framing of a shot is. Autofocus can track a subject in frame, but it can't track a story. Moments like when to rack to something in frame only when the character in the scene notices it, or maybe you stylistically want the shot to begin out of focus and slowly come into focus because its the perspective of someone who is just waking up... or maybe you want to achieve something like in the film "The Graduate" when Katherine Ross's character turns from her mother to Dustin Hoffman's character when she slowly realizes she's been cheated on. The focus doesn't become fully sharp until she understands the extent of the situation in her mind. Thats not something you can program into a camera. With that said, I do see how combining auto and manual focus to make the aspect of human error more forgiving while still maintaining the creative benefits that manual focus can bring to a film. I know some of the newer Canon Cinema cameras have that function, but it hasn't been fully explored to its fullest extent yet.

APPLE AND GOPRO BUILT GYROS IN A CAVE!! WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!! 20k camera: “Well I’m not Apple or Gopro”

Assistant Camera and Camera Technician here: It's a very difficult topic when you're dealing with professional video equipment, and there are so many sides and opinions from different people, professions and companies. Traditional filmmakers would say that these more manual or analogue aspects are important for storytelling and control over the delivery; also if everything got automated many people would become jobless because producers would do anything to get the production costs cut. Autofocus would cut the focus puller. In-built audio or xlr cuts the soundguy. Gyros gets the small studios that do VFX and CGI services. Not to speak of cable guys, video operators, grips and whoever else. On the other hand, reliability is essential for high-end movie production: if your teradek breaks you toss out the module and replace it. With The smallHD bundle you loose an monitor and the teradek. If you have to tweak the audio, the sound guy can do it from his stage and not bother the camera crew. Also bluetooth is considered "consumer technology", it's compressed, lags, doesn't support multiple channels etc. Now imagine a camera with all the things built in, and suddenly you loose your video feed. Get a new camera, that's probably 30k $ and many hours costing you. I believe that the independent filmmaker scene is still young and becoming a niche that gear manufacturers will, eventually, bow to; especially now that independent filmmakers are becoming big enough to afford professional video gear aimed, at least partially, to full crew productions. But I'm also afraid how this will translate to the traditional filmmaking, especially where nowadays everything is aimed at getting done as fast and cheap as possible.

@yungchopsticks

4 жыл бұрын

but what if they put a game boy on the camera?

@martemagua

4 жыл бұрын

@@yungchopsticks that would make the time waiting for the director, makeup or sound waay more fun!

@Ishinehappiness

4 жыл бұрын

Okay? good make them jobless. Thats a waste of money job when the camera could do it super easily. They can find work in other ways. Make movies cheaper,

@martemagua

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ishinehappiness Well first, that's cruel, we're talking about the livelihood of people here. Working for television and film is difficult by itself, especially because we're all mostly freelancers and getting projects can be hard. Second, movies will not get cheaper just because they cost less. It just means that the budget will go down, together with the overall quality. Maybe there will be more content overall for you to enjoy, but the producers will be the real winners here.

@jensenraylight8011

4 жыл бұрын

man, the sound guy and focus puller guy just wasting their life on the things that can be automated, they can choose to be a director or scriptwriter, instead, they become a lever puller it's irony, and yet people embrace it

Corridor: "Let's make a system that a normal person can operate!" *Industry unions want to know your location*

@Cosmitzian

4 жыл бұрын

It's sad that this is a thing. The original idea for that wasn't to keep people in useless jobs, but to make sure that people weren't getting scammed into doing more than their job.

@LnPPersonified

4 жыл бұрын

@@Cosmitzian Unions have always been a double edged sword. I want to protect workers just as much as the next guy (and I've had my ass saved by unions in the past), but the flip side is sometimes they ruin what would otherwise be simple solutions.

@thewildcardperson

3 жыл бұрын

@@LnPPersonified they really need some checks and balances of there own

Just noticed and totally dig the stars and stripes hanging in the office. Great video.

Yeah, the autofocus drives me absolutely insane. I totally get WHY a professional would want to use manual focus and a focus puller - but why do they not even have a decent option. More than anyone Blackmagic shocks me they don't do it properly yet. They're supposed to be this industry breaker, and yet the dream cameras right now for me aren't a Red or an Alexa Mini LF, they're the Sony FX9 and the Canon C500. Why, because they do 95% of what their "super pro elite" counterparts do, including soon 16bit RAW output and 15 stops of dynamic range on the FX9 and I tested that earlier this month with a motorised cinema lens and it's focus just grabs an eyeball and will not let go. It's like actual sorcery. EDIT: Additional note, yesterday on set, I had a threeway rack focus that would have been a pain in the ass for a manual focus pull without a wireless puller especially as the camera was basically on giant stilts, autofocus, nailed it. Same with this 3-minute monologue one take with the slowest pull out ever. (Yes I'm away I said three way rack and slowest pull out ever, that's film, get your heads out the gutter)

@LeonUnity

4 жыл бұрын

Benjamin Jackson But that’s the whole point of this video, Benjamin. Why aren’t functions that are on much cheaper products, there on super expensive kits. The options to turn them off, are all there even on the smaller stuff. I do use manual focus for a lot of stuff, usually when I need someone to stay in focus but I’m not moving for example. But the workflows would be so much simpler even for larger productions, if they were.

@anti0918

4 жыл бұрын

@@LeonUnity The consumer products may be cheaper, but millions more people are buying them. That's where all the money is, so that's where the competition goes, so that's where the innovation happens. Five people buying a $20k camera aren't going to fund an R&D department.

@cadmus777

4 жыл бұрын

Red was the 'industry breaker' at one point too...

I haven't seen Jake outside of an ad in so long :'( it's good to see you bud... hehehe LOL oh my gosh I was writing the first part of this comment before I realized it was an ad.

@Dargonhuman

4 жыл бұрын

Dang it!

That 3d tracking in footage would be amazing. It reminds ne of when you guys drew in 3d and watched what was happening through a live camera. Its totally possible to do with modern tech in a 2020 camera

The music in this episode is sick! props to whoever's in charge of that!

Jake you’re too good at integrating the ad portion into videos

Seems like they messed up the sponsor segment timer, so here is timestamp when it ends: 5:34

6:38 when Nico smiles, my heart smiles too

Imagine gyroscope with the precision of the Nintendo Switch's joycons or controlling a camera with them!

@PrismZet

4 жыл бұрын

so not that good at all :S

Maybe there next cameras will have water cooling. LTTstoredotcom.

@Arovna

4 жыл бұрын

I read this in my head and I heard Linus' daughter's voice

@IainMcClatchie

4 жыл бұрын

@@Arovna Did Linus Tech Tips ever finish water cooling their RED camera?

@Arovna

4 жыл бұрын

@@IainMcClatchie huuuuuuuuuh... ????

@IainMcClatchie

4 жыл бұрын

@@Arovna Sorry, I thought you might know what happened after LTT tore down their RED camera. I know they were thinking of water cooling it perhaps, but I don't if they ever went anywhere with that.

@ShivendraNagraj

4 жыл бұрын

@@IainMcClatchie They uploaded the part 1 of the video on 22 Jan 2020.

Linus from LTT said it best. 'the more you spent on a camera, the less it comes [equipped] with'

Really enjoyed this video! The lack of these features on mainline cameras shows just how much room there is for mobile filmmaking to make a bigger splash. With increased accessibility/convenience, all that’s left is for the quality to improve. When it does....it’s gonna get reaaaaal interesting!

Great vid. I could totally use the wireless audio. Also, does Wren have a stye? 12:45 Nothing but love, you guys are awesome!!

6:10 I'm getting the feeling that this is a sales pitch and you're about to ask for funding to create your perfect camera.

@Dread_Not

4 жыл бұрын

Yes some of the phrasing was weird, like saying that a camera cost as much as a Tesla which is just stupid and wrong.

@bobyford8051

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dread_Not how so?

@drpleaserespect

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dread_Not how about a RED with a lot of accessories..

@Powerman293

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dread_Not If Corridor worked with a camera production company and made a Kickstarter, I would throw some money in.

@matthewcockfield-hall2133

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dread_Not How is it wrong? Look at a Tesla model 3 online

I would like a camera that comes with a drink holder

The comment Wren made about marketers focusing on specs like resolution made me think of a guest that you could have on: Steve Yedlin. He's all about seeing through the marketing chatter and getting to the heart of what a camera can do.

Just like the way GoPro was founded, someone needs to take this feedback and make the perfect camera.

When Jake appeared I thought he will tell us about today's sponsor but... Oh wait...

Last time I was this early Niko still had long hairs

Can you guys do a video that shows off all the gear you guys use and perhaps even have your storeroom? I'm pretty sure you guys would make it interesting and informative and your audience would love to see it .... Maybe in another episode you guys could do the exact same thing about your computer's hardware and software .

I think you pretty much nailed it. Us more individual content creators have to come up with 'clever' ways to do some of the most basic things. When I solo film, I use my phone to check if I'm in frame, I have a external bluetooth talk to another external blue tooth, thats plugged into my audio device. and these are things that COULD be added.

I was stoked when i got my m50 cause i could change lenses 😂

I like Jake's ads, for some reason they make me laugh.

@Dread_Not

4 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear that people do because I can't stand them. I don't even like Jake anymore because he just comes across like a salesman/lawyer (which is what he is lol)

@maxjones503

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dread_Not That's a shame - someone has to take the hit I suppose.

@BlackPeagas

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dread_Not pretty much the same. If im looking at an ad prefer it to be simple and informative. These attempts to hide an ad and make it into a story that sometimes are excessively long is just annoying and off putting.

@noox13

4 жыл бұрын

Ads* You lagitametly threw me for a loop cuz I wasn't really paying attention to what I was reading and suddenly starting thinking of math, lol.

@Dread_Not

4 жыл бұрын

@@noox13 why spellcheck when you can't spell?

I'd be curious to see you do a head-to-head between one of your Reds and a BlackMagic Ursa Mini Pro 12K.

I follow you guys for a while now and it is kind of weird that I knew what features you guys wanted before watching the whole video and I am not even a "video maker". I think in multiple occasions you said theres features. Looking forward for the pro camera with a phone attached to it

Niko: "canon wont make a frankenstein camera with all the features" Canon: "announces eos r5" Niko left the chat

@techgoggles

4 жыл бұрын

Lucestre i really hope you are right... been looking up reviews for fews days for a interviews and indi film camera..

@techgoggles

4 жыл бұрын

Damn i went saw all videos for the camera, no features confirmed, every thing is rumoured and it doesn’t have any of the features from the video...

@TheShipMunksTV

4 жыл бұрын

@@techgoggles 8K video and 4k 120 fps is confirmed. But its prob gonna be around 4000-5000 dollars.

@AJCherenkov

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheShipMunksTV Okay but that's just the kind of "hard specs" the guys said were overemphasized in these cameras.

@TheShipMunksTV

4 жыл бұрын

@@AJCherenkov Canon is popular because of its auto focus, easy to use menus, color science etc

I'm a simple man. I see Jake, and I watch a sponsored segment.

@damyr55

4 жыл бұрын

Same. Every time someone skips Jake's segment, an Angel cries!

@MisterSweetProductions

4 жыл бұрын

That’s the worst copy and paste comment format

@petereinhardt

4 жыл бұрын

Loooool I don’t watch ads ever if I can help it. Especially not the same headphone ad they’ve been doing for so long. We see so much advertising as it is I really don’t need any more

Excellent points all around, folks. My company made the Oculus Quest (not "Occulus!") commercial you referenced so we have plenty of the same gripes you do.

Well, since you made this video & brought real attention to the subject, they will start to integrate those features into cameras eventually. So good job, you took the first step in that direction for us.

I watch this while I only own my poor android camera that can't focus and destabilizes video when phone is perfectly still

Professional cameras have high quality brands, large operations to manage. These big businesses are like boats: they turn slowly. New technology is created fastest by small companies who aren’t restricted by previous standards.

@OmiP42

4 жыл бұрын

Half of these features are in the iPhone. Just taking an example here. Apple is literally one of the biggest companies in the world.

@Raecast

4 жыл бұрын

@@OmiP42 Half the features on the iPhone, yet an iPhones video looks shit. Go figure.

Oh man, so true. Just got a new camera and shopping for cameras was so frustrating. It's crazy how weirdly stuck in the past DIGITAL cameras are. That should be the perfect platform for these types of innovations.

Post stabilization is not a good idea, because it requires that you have no motion blur in the footage

PotatoJet answers a lot of these questions in his various videos (if you're wondering why RED and other brands do what they do)

@zetrocadartse646

4 жыл бұрын

Can you say the names of the videos? Im just discovering potato's videos and really want to hear what he has to say :o

@otakudoctor8423

4 жыл бұрын

i double @zetroc

@Leibniz_28

4 жыл бұрын

@@zetrocadartse646 x3

@dukebozikowski3801

4 жыл бұрын

Potato jet really doesn’t know much abt cameras and how/why they’re made. The dude can’t even figure out how to properly use a Sony camera smh

@thetrivium2261

4 жыл бұрын

​@@dukebozikowski3801 Nice guy but he does assume a lot, and can be inaccurate as a result.

I was expecting Jakes grievance to be that RED doesn't have Skillshare...get your free learning discount today with code CORR! But he actually.did better.

I really love the editing in this video. Nice work!

You were right on every single thing that you said, but I hate auto focus and stabilization cameras, as a vfx artist that rely on the fact that the shot stay the same (I'm working alone so I can't both act AND manage the camera) And the fact that my camera (Coolpix b700, i know, it's not the best, but this is what I have) can't lock the exposure, auto focus or even the camera motion (yeah, it make the frame shift according to where i am and it's *destroying* my clean plates because of that) Is the reason I hate stabilization.

Jake is a walking ad at this point.

1:50 Doesn't it make sense that you have to calibrate the lenses though? Phones and go pros don't have interchangeable lenses and more of a closed system device (I.E. no modularity where different equipment can interact disruptively)

@NathanCarterVids

4 жыл бұрын

So after that didn't he say something like "if you could have presets saved for each lens built into the camera"

@DavidMulderOne

4 жыл бұрын

When it's built in though the body could easily be aware of which lens is attached (no idea whether that already exists right now or not), so that shouldn't be much of a problem.

@VIDEOdugo

4 жыл бұрын

If you listen on, their suggestion is to include the hardware but have profiles for lenses, so rather than having a separate piece of hardware and calibrating every time you change a lens, you only have to calibrate each lens once and select the appropriate profile when you change.

@NathanCarterVids

4 жыл бұрын

@@DavidMulderOne not always. There's tons of cinema glass that doesn't transmit data.

Watching this after the DJI Ronin 4D came out, it's checked so many of the boxes mentioned here, all in one package

One of the reasons why there's so much focus on numerical increases is that it's /really/ easy to sell us stuff based on "the numbers are bigger". You see it all over tech: pixel counts, clock speeds, ram, etc - anything with a number that's bigger than the old one is both easy to make marketing for, and easy to get people to say "why yes, that /is/ better". Many other features are harder to convey the value of to people who haven't had need of them. You also get some really weird pushback to new features in the form of buyer-snobbery from people who don't want to change how they do anything. Those folks want to pick up something and have it work more or less identically to what the previous one did, especially if they tried out the new thing in an earlier form and had issues. There doesn't have to be a lot of those folks, but they're often older and established and complain loudly so people listen to them more than they really should.

Hmmm that's so interesting. I'm a lamen, I watch this channel cause I love knowing about the behind the scenes stuff to movies I love. I know very little about cameras. I never would have guessed that such high end cameras were so lacking in equipment. So that begs the question then, at what point is it right for an indie film maker to just use the lower end stuff with the solutions and what point is it right to use the high end stuff? And if it's so lacking in these features, why use it at all? What are the tradeoffs here?

@ninok199

4 жыл бұрын

Image quality in the end is the trade-off. High end camera manufacturers know that ultimately that's what matters and that's why you'll be willing to put up with all the hassle to get it. If that gap continues to shrink as it has, then they'll start implementing the usability features.

@zakbobby

4 жыл бұрын

With the higher end cinema cameras you get better resolution, more dynamic range and other features that make the image really versatile in post and it almost always looks great. Everyone I know tries to strive for a great image and those cameras deliver. Though when it comes to the convince of auto focus and wireless sound, indie filmmakers are willing to give that up in order to get a better image. It's hard argument to make.

@Leo0718

4 жыл бұрын

Auto-focus and motion tracking won't make a movie good. A typical high-end camera is almost all sensor chip and image processor. Great optics, great sensors, powerful processing, are all expensive and the tools of visual story tellers. One of the reason most of these features fail to make the pro market is because they are not up-to-par with a pro standard while not being essential for quality visuals. They are ok at the consumer level. But a jittery low res motion tracking will hardly help Fx artists who program the animation of individual strands of hair on a model. To reach a level of usefulness you have to pay a few grands more. A camera with all the features that the Crew Corridor mention here, at a pro level, would take a camera from $20,000 to $40,000+ cost. Something that will not make quality film-making more accessible, but less, as it would ramp up the cost of production. I still remember the Iphone movies. “independent film maker makes movie with Iphone!”. Dude spends tens of thousands on bespoke lenses. Because that is where most of the image quality lies on and a high quality picture will be praised everywhere by everyone. Jittery and jarring AR models will not. And the audience won't care how the director monitored the audio or image.

3:10 "the reds are pretty much unusable, they are very very slow and very difficult to quickly acess.." Sam sounds like american propaganda few decades back

@jeffkardosjr.3825

4 жыл бұрын

Sounds like the Red Scare of today.

You can tell Wren had a ton of fun making those focus demonstration videos. I love you guys.

This is actually so tru...I also thought of that, like no front to my a7sii and the "5-axis-sensor-stabilization, but the iPhone Stabilization...damn...

one thing i love from corridor crew is how smooth their transitions are, you dont expect it but when you realize youre watching jake on the sponsored segment, and i love it

Why would RED invest in creating a good autofocus system, when 90% of us people using the camera won’t use autofocus? I have an A7RIII for that! Might even get a Canon C200 or a new Sony Fs9 or whatever is called for that, but then I’d have to use autofocus lenses, depriving me of using great manual lenses. And I will only use autofocus shooting interviews, people walking towards the camera, like blogs, some corporate video, and small things like that, I can’t use autofocus with fiction or dramatized content. And that’s why I use a RED, Alexa, etc... I’ve shot about 90 hours of episodic tv using RED and Alexa cameras without the need of autofocus or stabilization. And I’ve only used autofocus for still photography and very small corporate video with my Sony A7RIII. And besides not needing them, it’s because of costs, you know how many cameras does that still cameras sell? In the tens to hundreds of thousands, how many RED’s? For G sake! Now colors? You know how much does it cost to change the color of a camera that builds so little of them? I wouldn’t want to pay more just for color, I’d rather pay for quality and reliability.

@CallMeTheWaffle

4 жыл бұрын

It's okay, "God" isn't a curse word. You don't need to censor that on here.

@OGPatriot03

4 жыл бұрын

You're missing the point and I'm positive your numbers are way off, I think you're projecting your use case into thousands of other people who may appreciate more features, in fact why would more OPTIONAL features be a bad thing? Especially when they would be cheap and easy to add in. Cost isn't a factor when we've demonstrated consumer devices can do it just fine, and your entire argument about lenses has no value because choosing which lens you want to use is entirely up to you, no once will be forcing you to use something that wouldn't be right for you. Why should you have to use an inferior quality Camera for useful features for specific use cases? That seems to have been your argument. It's an easy win for Camera manufacturers, since the internal components are small and cheap enough to fit into a smart phone and would offer nothing but new features to users at no extra cost when you're talking 30k Cameras with INSANE profit margins.

@pablovi77

4 жыл бұрын

Patriot 03 You clearly don’t know about this business. Do you know how many RED cameras are built every year? And how many are sold? Do you know how many cameras like the still photography ones shown here sell? Still cameras are way smaller, cheaper and sell a lot more, not to mention the manufacturers make their own lenses. And at least Canon and Nikon are very protecting of their technology, and won’t give you access to it! Just ask Zeiss, they only create autofocus lenses for Sony, because they’re the only ones that allowed them to! Canon is barley making a professional cinema camera with autofocus this year! They haven’t made one before. Nikon doesn’t have one. And Sony has one, again only this year, and it’s not the top of the segment, it’s more intended for the market that uses autofocus. And guess what, those only two cameras out of dozens only support their own lenses for autofocus. So what’s RED supposed to do? Chose a lens manufacturer and alienate the rest!? Autofocus technology has advanced a lot for decades, still photography manufacturers are at an advantage, because they have been doing it for almost half a century! Cinema cameras manufactures have never done it! So, to sum it up. Canon only offers good autofocus on Canon C200, the entry level cinema camera and has just done it on the C500II, the flagship of their cinema cameras and it’s a few months old! And only works with Canon still photography lenses! Lenses that people who buy it won’t even use! Sony offers it on the new FX9, a few months old. Only works on Sony lenses, still photography ones. It’s their non top of the line cinema camera, it’s not for people that do the sort of work that could use autofocus. Not a single manufacturer has a top of the line cinema camera with autofocus. With stabilization is the same. No one offers it, because it take a slot of processing power to do real-time stabilization with that heavy files! They offer lens stabilization because still lenses have it.

@pablovi77

4 жыл бұрын

Patriot 03 You know nothing about the subject, yet you dare to call arguments horrible. And resort to dumb political comments. Don’t know what’s a boomer. To keep it simple, is not cheap, is not easy and it’s not needed. That’s why they don’t exist. Again, they improve their prosumer line to offer those things, because, that’s the people using them. Basically if you need autofocus, just don’t buy a cinema camera. They are intended for other uses.

@pablovi77

4 жыл бұрын

Patriot 03 This if from someone that actually shoots video, but not Cinema or big budget fiction or commercials. He actually bought a RED camera but resold it and sticks with non top of the line cinema cameras, and tells you who are they for. kzread.info/dash/bejne/indstKmqdNWtgsY.html

I think the thing I'm surprised we haven't seen in high end cameras is more flexible versions of these ideas. Instead of image stabilisation and AR, for example, a gyro and scanning (LIDAR, for example) module that plots your camera and what it's seeing in 3D space, so you could stabilise, motion track AND roto using the data therein. Most of these features you mention might not be popular with bigger studios because they want the flexibility to do it in post, but having the camera shortcut how it could be done in post would be the best of both worlds, in my opinion.

how about vfx specific camera or some vfx specific camera module produced by either third party company or main company that you can just attached to your existing camera. gonna be a little bulky for suree but its still kinda fine. and in that module, there's active 3D tracking. active motion tracking, built in VR connection, etc.

I thought Bone Phone was a dating app

I think built in memory would be great in some cameras. Even if it is just used as a built in back up. Desk top computers have had read an write speeds faster then cameras for years. Computers has SSDs that go up to 3,500MB/s where the fastest memory cards are around 1,500MB/s. You could fit an entire 1TB M.2 NVME drive in a mirrorless camera and it'll probably be the size of a DSLR.

Can you upload a video that is just the footage of Wren smiling and walking towards the different cameras with some happy music playing in the background? That's some ASMR top quality

Maybe do a follow-up video on the software too? Processes that are one/two click operations on phone apps are a pain to do in After Effects etc.

Major camera company: Focuses almost completely on making a better image come out of their camera. Third Party Accessory Manufacturers: Makes accessories to add functionality. Corridor: How dare they. Aside from my own personal joke, here's my two cents. This really feels like scraping the bottom of the barrel. Corridor knows full well why all these totally niche additional functions aren't in high end cameras right now. These companies don't care about the small independent studio in this case. They don't add 3d self tracking because it'd just end up being a gimmick that VFX studios could do better, and they already have lite 3rd party versions of this for on set with green screen compositing. They don't add image stabilization because someone using a 30K camera should be able to get a steady shot, IBIS can add unnatural motion to a shot, and calibrating a gyroscope for every lens is tedious. Autofocus isn't a priority because cinema lenses aren't electronic. Wireless monitoring has already been solved by third parties. Wireless audio is not going to be taken seriously by the film community due to the transmission quality being so much less than wired, and the consistency not being on par. Why would any cine camera manufacturer waste R&D on these low return features that would take immense time and money to get to an adequate level? Especially when 3rd party companies are already working on decent solutions. Corridor is one of few youtube studios that I would consider to be professionals, but this video shows immaturity of understanding from a business perspective, or a desperation for content at the expense of quality.

@dejochemvaningen

4 жыл бұрын

This comment should be pinned to the top. I work in film and am absolutely triggered by this video from CC.

2:17 "some way to profile your lenses": It is far from trivial to create such a profile for a fixed lens and even more challenging for a lens with zoom and focus. You would still need to create a profile for every combination of camera body and particular lens. Lenses in Phones and GoPros cannot be changed and these devices target a consumer audience. Film-makers want a better quality. Including a feature which by design would only produce "okay" results for a demanding industry does not look like a good idea to me.

@ironized

4 жыл бұрын

Also you don’t have to do it for every body. Just the body youre implementing it on.

@jeremylakeman

4 жыл бұрын

@@bosstowndynamics5488 Right. 1) Standardize the hardware connection and data protocol for streaming multiple data feeds from externally attached devices to be stored alongside the video. That could include acceleration, zoom, etc.

On that note, i would really like to see you make a short film using nothing but gopros, would be very curious to what kind of challenges it would generate for you

My issue with all these issues are they only effect a small percentage of the people who may use the camera. RED, Arri and kind of BM and Canon's higher end cameras are aimed at a professional shoot. You'd have a steadicam or track / dolly for smooth shots, focus puller so no need for auto focus, Arri have now actually put a wireless system into some of there cameras but still if certain DoPs want certain monitors then it may not be compatible so easier to use a 3rd party wireless system. Again for sound, you have a sound recordist, the camera would be huge if you add that feature to it. The will have radio mics on actors as well as a boom and have to mix the audio fading up and down for the dialogue so the camera couldn't do all that. The VFX point I agree with as the number of times there isn't a VFX supervisor on set and there is a debate on what info we should note down for them, so the camera doing it all would be good. I think there are enough cameras for the lower end shoots the do all of those things and for the bigger cameras there just isn't the need for it.

When there’s more likes than views, you know you’re early!

You guys literally hit all the nails right on the head! Pulling the industry forward! 😎 👊🏻

Using the XDV app on your phone in tandem with the Campark Xtreme UHD 4K you can not only wirelessly monitor, but wirelessly use your camera.

3:34 Thank you. For giving us the joy of that reference ♥️ Now, make it happen 😁