These 5 minute explanations are really a gem.

The most understandable explanation on RANSAC.

very good intuitive explanation on RANSAC, thank you, Dr. Stachniss...

I really enjoy this series! :) Thanks a lot.

You literally carried my graducation project to safety with your slam videos and now i am watching this for my job! thank you so much

Thank you for your video series on visual geometry. It really helped me alot for my exam preparation. The 5min videos are perfect to get an overview, but also the lectures are very well done!

Thanks prof for the fantastic videos.

great insight, thank you, Professor Stachniss

Couldn't be explained better and more efficiently. Thanks.

Nicely briefing all the concepts under 5 minutes! I suggest everyone check out the full playlist of 11 videos.

This is gem of a video.

thank you. it would be great if you could add links to articles or other materials in the description of the video for a detailed reading of the topics of your five-minute videos.

To the point. Thank you!

you made my exam revision thanks

Great, thanks!

explaination is really cool within 5mins... keep them coming :)

Simple and clear thank you!

Thank you, professor.

Thanks, great explanation for ransac

i love the enthusiasm. quite an engaging presentation.

This video is very perspicuous.

many thanks. really useful.

Pure Gold in thoses videos, thanks a lot

@CyrillStachniss

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

thank you so much very well explained

thank you for your explanation, it is very friendly for beginners.

awesome explanation 👌🏻

The class was very good . I really learn lots abt ransac

Thank you Cyrill

Very nice way of explaining the things

damn that shirt is well pressed..

really helpful

Can you share the Python code about ransac

Using random sampling of the 2 initial test points seems naive. Is that really the method used? How many times do you do this random test? The random sampling could be choosing all the wrong points, for a very long time...

@CyrillStachniss

2 ай бұрын

The corresponding lecture video explains all that…

@tazanteflight8670

2 ай бұрын

@@CyrillStachniss My comments are directed at Ransac, not you. But "playing the odds" doesnt make ransac correct. My sample size is small enough that I just test every possible connection. My results are based on the correct selection. Ransac's results are based on the wrong selection. I was just surprised at its implementation, thats all.

60% cannot be outliers, because then the 40% are the outliers: kzread.info/dash/bejne/a3hp1NStc6bFdZM.html