You know an equation is hard when it includes pitchforks and sweating letters

@ikennamadueke9131

5 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@Fildoggy

4 жыл бұрын

George Gilmore lmaoo

@sentosaco

4 жыл бұрын

these comments are literally killing me

@themvp3447

4 жыл бұрын

I totally get this. :-))

@Tom-fh3zg

4 жыл бұрын

...lol, very good. Pitchforks, lmao

Police man : You were speeding, do you know how fast you were driving? Heisenberg: No but I know exactly where I am Police man: You were driving 100mph Heisenberg: Great, now I am lost.

@shlimeslat6637

4 жыл бұрын

freddan6fly it’s either I’m too dumb to understand your joke or it’s just really bad one, or both 😂

@freddan6fly

4 жыл бұрын

@@shlimeslat6637 It is indeed a bad joke based in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle delta x multipled with delta p >= h/2. h is Plank's constant. delta x is position, delta p is motion. You can know either motion or position.

@matthewparker9276

4 жыл бұрын

Is that 1 x 10^2 mph or 1.00 x 10^2 mph. there may be hope for Heisenberg yet.

@Migger_29

4 жыл бұрын

And then Planck is sitting in the passenger seat saying “get any closer and you’ll forget where you are”

@seriousmaran9414

4 жыл бұрын

He knows how fast he was going relative to the road, not how fast he is going now. Road moves due to rotation of earth, orbit around the sun, movement of solar system. As he still does not know his real speed he is fine. Location is sitting in his car next to the policeman, somewhere relatively close to the Andromeda galaxy. :P

Beginning: cool i understand Middle: hold on- End: what is an e l e c t r o n?

@supernova1552

3 жыл бұрын

Same girl same...

@danielnittmann2169

3 жыл бұрын

What is a drop of hydrogen vapor

@MDBowron

3 жыл бұрын

Stephen Hawking has theorized in the zero-energy universe, which is based on the idea of the law of energy conservation, that the total of all energy in the universe equals to zero. What he gives as an example is a person wanting to turn a flat piece of land into a hill by digging earth/dirt out of a hole. The hill in its totality represents positive energy or matter, the hole being the inverse or negative version in volume of the hill represents negative energy or space. Hawking theorized that negative energy may be gravity which increases negatively in proportion to the amount of mass of positive energy or matter, the heavier something is the more gravity it produces. But I personally have a different idea. Current astrophysicists theorize that there is a substance called dark energy, which is said to be a repulsive force, that is increasing the expansion of the universe. They also have a theory of dark matter, or matter that is invisible and acts a binding agent or gravity to keep galaxies from falling apart. There is also the postulation, or idea, of most of the volume of an atom or particle being empty space, and this reminds me of the idea that only 5 percent of the universe is meant to have ordinary matter, the next 23 or so percent being dark matter, and the rest being dark energy. Now I theorize that given the ratio of matter to space in a particle or atom, it seems awfully similar with the idea of most of the majority of the universe being dark substances. Now if Hawking is correct that space is negative energy and negative energy allows gravity, how can we reconcile these opposing theories? Well what if space, negative energy, was dark energy and dark matter? If space is expanding, then space fits with dark energy being a repulsive force, but I don’t believe all the negative energy is repulsing in only one direction. Dark energy surrounds galaxies, and thus in expanding outwards, would also press upon galaxies and thus physical objects like matter or positive energy, this pressure leading to a multiplied or ‘dense’ although ‘dense’ is not really the right word, but an increased or maximized form of dark energy compression, which could behave like a congealed form of dark energy, and thus be mistaken to be dark matter. This repulsive force or dark energy upon these physical objects of positive energy would thus become the force of gravity. The maximized negative energy would increase the repulsive force, and thus increase the force but decreasing the pressure (as there is no physical matter) against the physical matter object, and this could be what we feel as gravity. The multiplying decrease of pressure being negative energy, would thus feel less the further away from the postive energy object, but would increase the closer you came to the physical positive energy object, which causes the increase of gravity and thus creates acceleration of nearby objects towards the positive energy matter. I also theorize that since space is within an atom or a particle for that matter, the fact that this space is negative energy or dark energy may explain something. What if the particle was basically a type of positive energy matter force-field around a body of negative energy. The negative energy or space pushes the positive energy/matter outwards so it doesn’t collapse from outside pressing negative energy or dark energy into a singularity, and thus causing that matter to collapse into a miniature black hole or something similar. The fact that the particle remains in a spherical shape is because the positive energy is pushed back and forth between the external dark energy and the internal dark energy, which is why a particle resembles a sphere when observed in a scanning tunnelling electron microscope. But isn’t a particle also a wave? How does that work into this theory? The equal force from the internal dark energy and the equal force from external dark energy makes the positive energy matter become the spherical shape, but if this particle was say in a more dense or less strong surrounding dark energy, the particle could expand and spread into a field flowing in all directions until reaching the force of dark energy, thus becoming a wave of probability. I believe that when this wave is disturbed by either increased dark energy forces or that enacting upon a nearby positive energy matter body, or is observed the wave can then collapse into a particle. Because the wave is spreading everywhere, the collapse of the wavefunction would appear to be random, and thus be made out of a field of uncertainty, but to me its like recording old analog TV static on a VCR and then hitting pause, trying to position where that next piece of static will be. It happens so fast and there are so many probabilities affecting it that it appears random. Now I want to talk about another topic that may be related: String theory and M-theory. Superstring theory theorizes (hence the name) that particles are made out of small slithers of waving positive energy/matter string. Now strings can appear as single strands like a piece of string, or can appear as a loop of string. Now according to M-theory built upon superstring theory strings can expand into sheets called membranes or branes for short, which to me could form into physical shapes, like perhaps a sphere. It has also been suggested in particle-wave duality that all matter or positive energy is made of vibrations. Now just as particles can expand into waves, I see a correlation between the string and the particle, and the membrane as a wave, call it a string/particle-membrane/wave duality or string-membrane duality. The particle is simply the membrane of a string spread evenly around the negative energy thus forming the matter/positive energy force-field. They say that strings vibrating in different ways can create different particles. Now here’s where something else comes in: The Higgs Boson. The Higgs Boson is the particle of the Higgs Field which creates mass of particles. Remember when a motorboat would travel through a large lake or sea and there would be drag created by say a skiier holding onto a rope connected to the boat? Well I believe that as particles move through this Higgs Field, they create a drag which causes the appearance of mass. Now there have been detected two particles of the same size but each with very different masses. Now how can this be? Well there would be a reason for the particle to drag through the Higgs Field, and this is energy density. Suppose the string or vibration that made up the same size but incredibly light particle was a very long extended vibration, like say the frequency of a radio wave. The same size but incredibly heavier particle would have a very high narrow vibration, like say the frequency of a gamma ray. The increase in frequency leads to an increase in energy density, and how that particle’s charge through relation with the photon, and spin with the Higgs Field and dark energy, leads to the different interactions of various particles. It’s all the same positive energy, just different packets of it with different frequencies and different sizes. Now the collapse of these waves into particles to me also has another application. If you don’t know, there is an intense debate between trying to link quantum mechanics (which is how particles interact and behave as bits of energy) and general relativity (which is about how gravity affects large objects like moons, planets, stars and galaxies). Now quantum mechanics says that when a wave is being observed, it collapses into a particular spot and hence becomes a particle. Now General Relativity says that objects with mass or postive energy, basically, warp the space and time (as time is also a measure of distance and distance a measure of the time taken to cross that distance) thus causing nearby objects to fall into the warp of space time and thus become attracted to the physical matter object. What if this wave affected by dark energy or a nearby mass of positive energy, was the same as the positive energy or planet or physical object affecting the negative energy containing the space time? Thus this would link the effect of General Relativity warping space time (what I call macro negative energy mixed with the Higgs Field), the same time how space time and Higgs Field and negative energy (micro negative energy and Higgs Field) causes the collapse of wavefunctions into particles? Thus this would link General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics regarding the Collapse of the Wavefunction, the former being simply a larger version of the latter, one happening on a macro scale, the other on a micro scale. I hope that explains things, and I hope it has helped you answer those questions. Now if I’m wrong or right, please let me know. I’d like to know. Peace.

@danielnittmann2169

3 жыл бұрын

@@MDBowron now thats a holographic Super symetric engine necessary for a tanked flight loading muscle suit., I use whipper snipper cord and rust remover in uv setting glue., Add a tronomic baratone to a Bobby pin and whoosh pop zap

@jalabeanos9311

3 жыл бұрын

@@MDBowron who asked?

Well that was bloody spectacular. As a layman who has been avidly reading content on the subject for almost four decades, this is the first time I have ever caught a true, clear glimpse of some of the finer details in the incompatibility problem between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, and this is making me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like I have just gained a bit of super cool insight. Thank you.

@TeamDayaShankar

4 жыл бұрын

Whattt?

@SahilAsterix

4 жыл бұрын

Same

@frankdimeglio8216

3 жыл бұрын

THE THEORETICAL, SIMPLE, ULTIMATE, CLEAR, LINKED, BALANCED, AND EXTENSIVE MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS PROVEN, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. The perpetual motion of THE PLANETS in RELATION to WHAT IS THE SUN is the result of the fact that gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, as this IS proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. GREAT !!!! ACCORDINGLY, a given PLANET sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AS GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. THEREFORE, this NECESSARILY represents, involves, and describes what is MOTION AND NO MOTION IN BALANCE. SO, THE SPEED OF LIGHT (c) IS THEN understood as a POINT; AS the SPACE that envelopes THE EARTH IN BALANCE IS the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE. E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Indeed, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/with WHAT IS THE EARTH. NOW, LOOK at what is the translucent, semi-spherical, AND BLUE SKY. THE EARTH is ALSO blue. SO, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Indeed, a PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as a POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT (c). GREAT. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy IS gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/energy, as electromagnetism/energy is gravity. Gravity AND electromagnetism/energy are linked AND balanced, as electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Carefully consider what is THE EYE along with the falling man. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. (E=mc2 is directly and FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. That is where Einstein got it from.) This NECESSARILY represents, involves, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. THOUGHTS are invisible. Very importantly, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which thought is SIMILAR to sensory experience. SO, BOTH equations apply to, represent, AND perfectly describe the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE as invisible AND VISIBLE ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL SPACE in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium AND BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Consider THE MAN who is standing on WHAT IS the EARTH/GROUND. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Take careful notice of WHAT IS THE ORANGE SUN. Beautiful. Now, carefully consider the role and RELATIONAL significance of what is the eyelid. Consider what is lava. The viscosity of lava is BETWEEN that of what is water AND what is the Earth/ground. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Time DILATION ALSO ULTIMATELY proves that GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Indeed, this not only explains the term c4; but it ALSO explains the significance of the fourth spatial dimension. GREAT !!! Notice that THE DOME of a person's EYE may also be visible. THINK. IT IS CLEARLY PROVEN. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Moreover, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Ultimately and truly, time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (E=mc2 IS F=ma.) This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of thought (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. THINK. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The full distance in/of SPACE is thus LINKED and BALANCED with what is the middle distance in/of SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, stellar clustering ALSO proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Carefully consider what is A GALAXY. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) By Frank DiMeglio

@trey4l

3 жыл бұрын

You mean a qubit of insight lmao

@frankdimeglio8216

3 жыл бұрын

THE THEORETICAL, CLEAR, AND UNIVERSAL BALANCING OF E=MC2 AS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, time DILATION proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) I have mathematically unified and BALANCED physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 is necessarily AND CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. Great. It is CLEARLY AND FULLY proven in what is a BALANCED fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. In fact, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEARLY proven. It is a very great truth in physics that the ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR reconfigure sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) INDEED, E=mc2 IS DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS time dilation proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Consider the man who is standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. SO, the mathematical unification of Einstein's equations AND Maxwell's equations (given the addition of A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION) proves that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. By Frank DiMeglio

I can't even put into words how high quality this content is. Or how amazed I am that I'm learning it for free. You guys are absolutely incredible.

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

@obokengm788

Жыл бұрын

I know right 👀 I literally went to an ivy league school and this is 10× more informative and digestible

@doncappo1509

Жыл бұрын

IT SHOULD ALL BE FREE

@lynnjohnson2371

8 ай бұрын

Nothing of value is free. We pay our taxes and many contribute. Tanstaafl.

@Tchamaco

6 ай бұрын

It’s PBS!

"The non-renormalizability of quantized general relativity is connected to the idea that precisely localised particles produce black holes." That's a great pickup line

@Tom-fh3zg

5 жыл бұрын

I've used it with great success, even nerdy girls need love.

@hoorayimhelping3978

4 жыл бұрын

only the first time you hear it...

@q09876543

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, but what happens if she decides to create a discussion over what you just said? Good luck in your response!

@lateralus9244

4 жыл бұрын

Oh, yeah! That one gets me laid ALL...THE...TIME!!! It NEVER gets old. Lmao

@toseeornot2see

4 жыл бұрын

gacho well, if it works, you know you’ve got a keeper!

This guy is a terrific host. He explains/behaves in a way that keeps you interested and understanding. Charisma. Lots of other people would be robotic and boring reading the script.

Every other sentence has me daydreaming about something new. Very thought provoking and I end up missing something else. I gotta keep rewinding to catch what I miss. So much information at a high speed. Fantastic!

1:32 I understood that graphic!

@ASLUHLUHCE

3 жыл бұрын

Hah

@mamtasahu286

3 жыл бұрын

Physics can be sexy

The hardest problem in physics is why gravity acts 10x stronger when your alarm goes off at 7am🤔

@kuhluhOG

5 жыл бұрын

mine goes off at 5am because work starts at 7am...

@ineedmoney121

5 жыл бұрын

my alarm stays off cause i dont have a job.

@AnonimatosTM

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks to the solar alignement, at 12:AM the Sun is pulling you directly up, as for the 7 A.M this gravitacional pull does not exist. You may also note, a secondary effect, should your alarm clock fails, you may ocasionally be released from gravity by the means of a jar of water, suplied by either your parents, or your significant other.

@rykehuss3435

5 жыл бұрын

Superior Weeb What bad life decision? of having a job? Most physical jobs (electrician, repairman, technicians of many sort, plumbers, construction workers etc) start work at 7am here. Office rats usually start at 7:45. And if you have your own business you probably start at 5 or 6am.

@Ender7j

5 жыл бұрын

You guys realize that he might be a shift worker, meaning OP might indeed be employed...Jesus lighten up a little

It is so fascinating that, with measurement and mathematical logic, humans are able to access the nature of our universe.

@gamingcreatesworlddd2425

2 жыл бұрын

How much humans progressed as an civilization is amazing

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

@imbobbymuddah

3 ай бұрын

We could be so wrong about everything, all it takes is one miscalculation 😅

Don’t take this the wrong way but these are really the best videos on youtube to fall asleep too. Matt has such a nice and easy way of talking that it’s really calming. Thanks for the many well rested nights.

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

@PSBrathwaite

Жыл бұрын

How can you fall asleep during this and not have existential dread instead

@brianhudson9133

Жыл бұрын

These have helped me get to sleep for years.

@chriswest8389

11 ай бұрын

My voice is soo boring, I should record myself reading the rise and fall of the Roman Empire. Gareenteed to cure your insomnia overnight.

"How much information does the universe contain?" I'm still trying to figure out how much information this video contains. I'm sure both figures are far beyond my standard measurements.

@nemlolrawrlawl2350

4 жыл бұрын

The amazing answer is we know only some of what we don't know, and we don't know how much we don't know.

@ickorling7328

4 жыл бұрын

Figure out how much information is in a fractal... then you'll know. E-infinity theory.

@JackofAllTrades467

4 жыл бұрын

I read that quote as he said it... I’m out dude

@spotifyvibes319

3 жыл бұрын

A universe can contain infinite information. Evidence: our universe is expanding due to the white hole in our universe which is getting information from its other side, a black hole our (previous universe). Black holes takes the information it has, makes space within itself, floods that universe with information. Entropy is beautiful.

@stormypole

3 жыл бұрын

How many universe has been created??

I understood about a planck length worth of this stuff.

@amanpawar_ap

5 жыл бұрын

Most hilarious comment!!

@auDipquid

5 жыл бұрын

4 months and only 20 likes, very underrated comment.

@UniversalSouls

5 жыл бұрын

That's because it's a bunch of bullshit... Thunderbolts Of The Gods SAFIRE Project Electric Universe Model...

@christianlemelin9862

5 жыл бұрын

@@auDipquid STFU douchebag!👊

@yvesgomes

5 жыл бұрын

If I were to understand this stuff a black whole would pop up in my skull.

Y'all sleeping on the fact that this man spoke for 16 continuous minutes about quantum mechanics and general relativity without stuttering.

@lildyo

Жыл бұрын

Not to diminish how great this video is, but you do know that editing videos and doing retakes is a thing right?

@bbkintanar

Жыл бұрын

there are cuts in the video. they're just hidden in the "zoom ins" and "zoom outs"

My parents told me if I studied perturbation I'd go blind.

@cobalius

3 жыл бұрын

😂

@Tailspin80

3 жыл бұрын

Only if you’re a plancker.

@eymannassole6162

2 жыл бұрын

What ²'s they are

@papaclanc

2 жыл бұрын

@@eymannassole6162 Nice one!!

@papaclanc

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you. I thought it wasn't bad.

10:22 "Brought back to reality," oh there goes gravity.

@thorr18BEM

5 жыл бұрын

It only grows harder, only grows hotter.

@genzphilosoph-e

5 жыл бұрын

Quantum relativity

@Trias805

5 жыл бұрын

Heisenberg's uncertainty

@shannonm7981

5 жыл бұрын

Einstein's spaghetti.

@mellamopepe619

5 жыл бұрын

The singularity comes once in a swartzchild

This channel has taught and motivated me more than my 12 yrs of school. I appreciate it a lot.

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

I love how deeply you go into the topics you select. This is fantastic. Thank you!

I love this. It isn't just rehashing general relativity, but going on the edge of the mysteries. The way you explain it doesn't assume no one watching is a scientist!

2:15 When he says "space-time" and you're worried the video is about to end

Dude, this is harder than Sekiro.

@jmarch_503

5 жыл бұрын

Lmao i beat it twice

@azieran100

4 жыл бұрын

And Sudoku

@Biogenesiss

4 жыл бұрын

As said by Carlos Sekiro, japanese spiritual leader: "All you must do is to commit yourself with everything you have committed to do."

@alberttorres4830

4 жыл бұрын

It's not it's dumb theories.

@eatdikz

4 жыл бұрын

Yves Gomes life just like bideo game

My new goal is to one day understand this video completely

I keep returning to this and many other SpaceTime videos over time and there's always something new or previously unnoticed thing to discover or maybe rediscover:) Great source of knowledge and inspiration. This time it was the fact that unlike the other field theories where the physical-mathematical phenomena take place against the background of a coordinate system (space), that background in GR is spacetime itself, that is the very thing the theory is built on. So it becomes much more tricky to quantize gravity as you have to have some spatial background for a quantum theory to operate on - in its current form at least. That's why quantum loop gravity tries to do away with that background dependence, unsuccessfully yet.

6:28 finally i understand the planck length

@SquirrelASMR

5 жыл бұрын

Its small... like asian small

@SlimThrull

5 жыл бұрын

I know, right? He explained it in what? A paragraph or two? Wiki takes pages to try and do the same, but no one understands what it's talking about. (Okay, SOME people do, but certainly not most.)

@zahirkhan778

5 жыл бұрын

your comment made me understand planck length

@metamorph5286

5 жыл бұрын

@@zahirkhan778 small, right?

@7lllll

5 жыл бұрын

we all understand how small it is. what this video helps is understanding its relation to the uncertainty principle and microblackholes. if you just want to understand how small it is, then the powers of ten videos are better suited

mmhmm ... mmmmmhmmm ... yeah ... mhmm ... I know some of these words.

@cobalius

5 жыл бұрын

My problem too..

@Sol-Invictus

5 жыл бұрын

Public education makes idiots of us all. Your can't learn quantum physics in a vacuum and most parents just have no clue what to do with curiosity or funds to pay for driver's ed so woot.

@SolidSiren

5 жыл бұрын

ErectusCuntus Keep listening! Dont give up. Absorb all you can. Eventually, with a lot of devotion and endless curiosity, it becomes clearer. Its a huge amount of info to take in. I like to break it up into pieces, like a far away goal, and learn each little (ha! like any of it is little) concept as I go. PBS Spacetime helps ALOT.

@wayne4430

5 жыл бұрын

LMAO!

@megamanmadrid

5 жыл бұрын

I can only tell you that these KZread videos teached me stuff that I never could have dreamed or imagined to learn in school. The amount of knowledge I have now compared to what I knew when I was a kid is just impossible to describe.

Your Schrodinger Equation at 2:50 is missing the Laplacian. I love your videos, keep up the great work.

@macro8236

4 жыл бұрын

Irrelevant since its in the time domain

@Jdc1197

4 жыл бұрын

@@macro8236 How is it irrelevant ?

@macro8236

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jdc1197 i assume you finished reading the whole sentence?

this guys voice is hilariously uncompressed compared to other videos of this genre

Everyone: Infinity war is the most ambitious crossover ever. Me:

@kx7500

4 жыл бұрын

Unfunny

@sohee7597

4 жыл бұрын

Not everyone will understand this comment xD

How do I love this channel? Let me count the ways! For the nuanced and difficult content discussed! For the great mini pop ups with a more verbose description! For the mellow and humorous host! For the amazing way they balance tough concepts without baby talking to me!! For the amazing graphics and animations! I love this channel!!!

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

its taken me a whole year to study this subject.. i thought it be boring back in 2018, but now i have started to understand these videos.. and i think its pretty amazing!

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

Lol when he said "space-time" a few minutes in I instinctively thought the episode was over.

I love how you end every episode with "Space Time"

PBS Spacetime always does a great job at thanking those who have helped them in continuing this series. I just want to take this time to thank PBS Spacetime for inspiring me to create my own very brand-new youtube series that heavily revolves around astrophysics. Thank you again Spacetime and please keep up the great work

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

Do an episode about loop quantum gravity

@rareschelariu3

4 жыл бұрын

done

@dominickbergeron797

3 жыл бұрын

That’s literally the suggested video underneath this one!

@_sayan_roy_

3 жыл бұрын

@@dominickbergeron797 Do you understand the concept of time buddy ?

These videos are amazing, it hurts that only some subtitles have, but they are still great

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

It takes a paradigm shift to move from one era to the next. In 1904 humanity moved a giant step forward with the publication of Einsteins paper on relativity. Today a paradigm shift is needed to move humanity to the next level, we need the theory of quantum gravity. This is a 4 part video that tries to conceptualise a theory that solves a multitude of major physics problems. Five of these are explained in these 4 videos. For a single theory to solve so many physics problems is unheard of. So please concentrate on the consept and not the delivery. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

I think your videos are the best on You Tube or at least some of the best on You Tube that I have seen, in my opinion. Cheers - Mike.

to deal with nonrenormalizability you need a nonrenormalizabilibuddy

@Tom-fh3zg

5 жыл бұрын

....lol, very funny

@danielnittmann2169

3 жыл бұрын

Speak up buddy I' ll find ya

@cobalius

3 жыл бұрын

My squirrel might know, what's going on here🐿️

Great video series. Great job simplifying the topics without dumbing things down.

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

Really the most interesting, informative and well presented thing on the tube. Well done to all those people that make this great program. 💖👍🤓

@alanlowey2769

3 жыл бұрын

Do you think it's possible for dark matter to exist at the centre of the Earth?⁉️

I liked Sean Carolls approach to this. He said instead of quantizing gravity you CAN actually "gravitize" quantum mechanics. Your spacetime is entangled with the rest of the spacetime (the closer they are the more entangled) and if you assume that, general relativity naturally pops out of the Schrodinger equation (supposedly). It sounds too good to be true to me though...

@BattousaiHBr

5 жыл бұрын

i have no idea what that means, but sounds plausible.

@Dexduzdiz

5 жыл бұрын

I too didn't understand a word you just said, but after stroking my chin twice I'd like to think I agree.

@-_Nuke_-

5 жыл бұрын

Hey there Rolnicek care to share some links?

@MrRolnicek

5 жыл бұрын

Actually found it: kzread.info/dash/bejne/X5h1x8SnhKzWdNo.html

@toamastar

5 жыл бұрын

just finished that vid, so fascianating! His theory makes so much sense!

I have been waiting for this episode for yeaarrsss! IT'S FINALLY TIME!

@GenericInternetter

5 жыл бұрын

Sophia Astatine did you do other things during that time, or just sit around waiting?

@boudreaux99buddy65

5 жыл бұрын

Should have used retrocausality ...

@juunanagou7156

5 жыл бұрын

Jesus hates you.

@henrytjernlund

5 жыл бұрын

Do all women get hated upon in these groups?

@SophiaAstatine

5 жыл бұрын

@@GenericInternetter I mean, I started my bachelor during the wait?

I don't know why but when I hear about certain topics, which I honestly don't understand well but they are subjects that make me reflect with my head and make me think that they are really important subjects

In fact, the host MUST say "in fact" at LEAST 485,381,395,976,264 times per episode, MINIMUM, or all quantum dynamics reverses 528,836,824,725,936,419.735284 degrees and all of reality simultaneously crunches inward and radiates outward until it reaches the shape of a both infinitely huge and limitlessly tiny pink and purple polka dotted unicorn, within which all matter and energy instantly reform into blobs of goo switching back and forth between the form of a fairy princess and a green elephant. We need to pay this man way more for keeping our nice reality intact.

3:56 The subtitles had no idea what to do with

Your Hamiltonian in the Schrodinger Equation is missing the laplacian.

@martinibarra4903

5 жыл бұрын

holy fuck! its true, didnt saw that

@daviddelaney2407

5 жыл бұрын

And the square before that was labeled "QUANTUM RELITIVITY". --Dave, I don't think I ever litived to start with

Felt bad that you did not mention about leonard susskind while talking about the information paradox solution

Can you imagine how deep Peter Dinklage's voice would be if they didn't renormalize it when they brought him from quantum size to regular size for this video?? The gravitational pull to stretch his arms, torso, and legs out musta been an Isaac Newsance.

this is so awesome. I can barely understand but from time to time I learn something or my mind is blown love it

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

It takes a paradigm shift to move from one era to the next. In 1904 humanity moved a giant step forward with the publication of Einsteins paper on relativity. Today a paradigm shift is needed to move humanity to the next level, we need the theory of quantum gravity. This is a 4 part video that tries to conceptualise a theory that solves a multitude of major physics problems. Five of these are explained in these 4 videos. For a single theory to solve so many physics problems is unheard of. So please concentrate on the consept and not the delivery. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

It was small, but thanks for mentioning the Casimir Effect!

The whole "become smaller than the sum of the originals" actually makes sense if you don't think of those numbers starting as positives but rather negatives (ie -lightspeed), if they start as negatives then a simple subtraction (destruction on collision) results in a positive instead of a negative, this positive is what we observe and misunderstand as going smaller when in fact it has gone larger.

@BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv

Ай бұрын

You have made it very relevant, something is changing the phase as it happens in interference of waves .

GR is exponential, QM is linear, its hard to combine the two just on a surface level. the fact that GR has a constant tells you that its a model that isn't fundamental, none of our theories are likely fundamental but GR is likely very far from painting the actual picture and is just a makeshift fix to get accurate results.

I just feel like this "theory of everything" might one day be resolved with something similar to Gödels incompleteness theorems in math. This whole idea of modeling world inside the modeled world seems getting towards similar direction..

@-_Nuke_-

5 жыл бұрын

Nice insight

@thstroyur

5 жыл бұрын

Glad I'm not the only one who feels like that Ugh, and all the "let's talk of the anthropic principle as if it were physics"...

@thstroyur

5 жыл бұрын

If you're talking UTMs, that's a bad example, cuz it's useless to run a non-halting program in a computer. Perhaps the cosmo-verse would be a better one? Doesn't contradict observable data, goes all the way to the non-observable Universe

@panstromek

5 жыл бұрын

I meant that this hunt for Theory of everything feels similar to Hilbert program and one day some Gödelike physicist might prove that it's impossible to come up with a theory that explains everything at the same time. It has some similarities - theory is a model that can't capture everything unless the model is the universe itself. So we derive abstractions which simplify the model and that I think is the key - some abstractions are not compatible. So what if it is impossible to find combination of these abstractions in a way that explains everything? That's just my feeling though :D I only noticed similar pattern. If we find the theory, I am okay :D

@Ni999

5 жыл бұрын

panstromek The problem isn't that we can't come up with a suitable (math/physics) theory that explains everything together - it's that we can, we have, and validation is so difficult (an understatement) that it takes a lot of effort (read: long times) before discovering that the explanation was wrong, and we've been doing that repeatedly for over a century. Along the way we've invented and discovered new tools and encountered new information leading to new questions than we had at the beginning of each particular cycle of effort. When it's done - assuming success some day - we won't be done. We'll simply have hope that we'll know which of the next round of questions are valid. In the meantime, we'll always have 42. PS - Of course when I said that we've been doing this for over a century, I was referring to just this one aspect, GR vs QM. If you go back to the century before that, we had the atom and the ether and we were this > At each epoch the temptation to call it a day popped up. It was often accepted. That didn't ever solve anything and it did add a synthetic resistance to the dawn of each subsequent epoch. I'm arguing that, based on history, throwing in the towel and saying that we can't really solve anything further in fundamental physics is not a good idea.

Why did the chicken cross the road? It lacked the knowledge and technology to instantiate a stable Einstein-Rosen bridge to get to the other side. Obviously!

@godwho5365

5 жыл бұрын

Right On!

@fbabdiver

5 жыл бұрын

because it was going there anyway

@chrisgriffith1573

5 жыл бұрын

Becuase the chicken was running from Shrodinger.

@dallas2816

5 жыл бұрын

*Big bang theory laugh track plays*

@DarkenedHalo115

5 жыл бұрын

Chris Griffith was/wasn’t running/walking from/to shrodinger/shrodonger

I've got it! The equation is as follows: UnifiedFieldTheory = (Einstein + PsilocybinMushrooms + Time) / NikolaTesla

@Mikey-mike

4 жыл бұрын

Correction: Tesla^2 :)

@gerooq

3 жыл бұрын

forgot to divide by 0 vro

Pretty stoked to see Dr Becky in this playlist as well. A great add-in to compliment the channel

When you say string theory, only Michio Kaku comes to my mind. I would like to see an episode you and him.

Yes! A new Space Time video!

@-_Nuke_-

5 жыл бұрын

That was an awesome video!

@friendlydragon8999

5 жыл бұрын

Finally a video about quantum gravity

@SocuteRaptor

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and I have to watch it, although I don't understand anything.

@alexandragrace8164

5 жыл бұрын

I literally did a happy dance and scared my cat lol

@EmazingGuitar

5 жыл бұрын

Wh do i have a headache

This is one of the best videos of PBS space time

Excellent explanations. What about doing an episode on Liouville field theory?

As the saying goes ...Early bird gets the wormhole . I'll show myself out.

@charityL7

4 жыл бұрын

I wanted to share this lol

@tiny_toilet

4 жыл бұрын

I've never heard that saying. Nor do I see how it's relevant to the video.

@altonb93

4 жыл бұрын

Likes are at 69😏

@andrewnevermind4902

3 жыл бұрын

Just go.

Thank you for such quality content!

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

It takes a paradigm shift to move from one era to the next. In 1904 humanity moved a giant step forward with the publication of Einsteins paper on relativity. Today a paradigm shift is needed to move humanity to the next level, we need the theory of quantum gravity. This is a 4 part video that tries to conceptualise a theory that solves a multitude of major physics problems. Five of these are explained in these 4 videos. For a single theory to solve so many physics problems is unheard of. So please concentrate on the consept and not the delivery. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

If you want to know more about what's behind this, check out superfluid vacuum theory and gravity as a fluid dynamic phenomenon in a superfluid quantum space.

i find it interesting that discerning information about a particle to fine detail causes a black hole while black holes deal entirely with information.

I hope those black hole chocolates do evaporate.. because if he eats one, he'll gain a whole lot of mass.

@MClaudeW

5 жыл бұрын

He would expand

@MClaudeW

5 жыл бұрын

@Oldteach74 you havent heard of smash ogre and his encounter with the night stallion.

@user-pi7qh7jg9b

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe the chocolates would expand in his demise

@Brandon-wx2ty

5 жыл бұрын

New Message you are on all science videos

@seriousthree6071

5 жыл бұрын

Don't worry, it's cocoa mass. He's guaranteed to die happy.

"It sounds annoying, in fact it's a disaster" - Over reactive nuclear bombshell

'this sounds annoying...in fact it's a disaster' - best one-liner i've heard in a while

*Nobody:* *Literally no one:* *Not a single soul:* *PBS:* We know that for a particle to have a highly defined location, its position wave function needs to be constructed from a wide range of momentum wave functions that include extremely high momenta, i.e. the more certain its position the less certain its momentum and so large momenta are possible.

@johannesh7610

4 жыл бұрын

That is almost affronting

@frankdimeglio8216

3 жыл бұрын

Society of Physics Students -- UCLA has now given the following writing the thumbs up on their page: THE TRUE AND THE ULTIMATE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS NOW MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN: Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL resistance, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. This explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. INDEED, time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Ultimately and truly, time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This CLEARLY and truly explains c4 from Einstein's equations. THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS THUS CLEAR, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. I have mathematically unified physics/physical experience. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! IT IS CLEARLY PROVEN. INSTANTANEITY is thus CLEARLY FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) By Frank DiMeglio

This was a great video. You explained the incompatibility of quantum mechanics with relativity in a comprehensive way that I've never seen, and it really helped me understand where the conflict is. I'm gathering that one of the main things is that in order to quantize gravity like we do with everything else, you need spacetime to be a continuous field like the other fields, in which those quantized effects can occur properly. But spacetime isn't continuous, it's pixelated. So when gravity has a value somewhere, it would self-interact in ways completely contrary to what's observed in reality.

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

It takes a paradigm shift to move from one era to the next. In 1904 humanity moved a giant step forward with the publication of Einsteins paper on relativity. Today a paradigm shift is needed to move humanity to the next level, we need the theory of quantum gravity. This is a 4 part video that tries to conceptualise a theory that solves a multitude of major physics problems. Five of these are explained in these 4 videos. For a single theory to solve so many physics problems is unheard of. So please concentrate on the consept and not the delivery. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

2:51 The Laplacian is missing from the Hamiltonian

I love your videos!! You do an amazing Job explaining all of this complex (QM pun intended) stuff! A small thing I noticed @ 2:51 : Your Schrödinger Equation is lacking the Laplacian from the Momentum operator! Just for completeness! It‘s actually not important at all! (Unless you want your particles to actually move in space xD)

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

I keep watching matt and i seem to be able to follow less and less each time but keep watching it would be great to be able to follow one of these from start to finish but i know i never will

I only know that I know nothing

@godlessrecovery8880

5 жыл бұрын

How do you know?

@johnbates2709

5 жыл бұрын

The Exoplanets Channel If you know that, you know everything. In the fabric of space time, nothing and everything share the event horizon. Or to put it another way

@Tethloach1

5 жыл бұрын

That is not very precise it could mean many things, it could mean that you know something incomprehensible, it could mean the information is not contained within the human mind aka blank and we just hold on to it knowing nothing as the base of all knowledge, vague descriptions are subject to wild interpretations, since communication contains some level of vagueness it explains why arguments will always be had, self referential statements are truthful lies, you are telling a truthful lie sir. the point of questions is to test the foundation of knowledge contained within the area being questioned some foundations are weak leading to dismissal of questions and some questions are loaded leading to discomfort.

@shaneschofield6303

5 жыл бұрын

Are you Jon Snow?

@nopo6012

5 жыл бұрын

I know that you don't know that you're supposed to use periods to end your sentences.

Alright, this is right on the knives edge of my understanding.

I learn more from this channel than I did from my 4 year physics degree. Thanks

This exemplifies the limits of mathematical expression of reality.

@ktriplej23

3 жыл бұрын

*Current limits of mathematical expression

@Greenmachine305

3 жыл бұрын

@@ktriplej23 No, ultimate. Math will never be able to fully express infinitely dynamic possibility.

@py10playz82

3 жыл бұрын

@@Greenmachine305 it is. Math can fully describe reality, but humans cant fully describe the math.

Do a video on Quantized Inertia please!

7:54: Great Scott! That would require 1.21 gigawatts!

my hypothesis is that the "graviton" would be a planck-length black hole which would weigh 10^8 kg. This very heavy mass would explain the weakness of the force, since all forces strength are inversely proportional to their mass

What if, at the quantum level, space/time are relatively non-existent? Consider quantum entanglements over large areas. The changes to one happens simultaneously to the other, no matter the distance. This could be explained if space and time were not actually fundamental measures in quantum mechanics. However, if you use the measure of space/time as a unit of energy you can explain, that as things get larger and more massive they can "warp" things that are functions of either or both. Thus a measure of gravity is measure of energy/mass and time and space are functions of both.

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

At last we have a theory of quantum gravity that actually makes sense. Cherry on the top is it works flawlessly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

Schrodinger's equation @ 2:54 is missing a Laplacian operator

@brightsideofmaths

4 жыл бұрын

Indeed. And the Laplacian is the most important ingredient there.

@geraldsittly1512

4 жыл бұрын

not, when µ=m/Δ and m is the mass

@brightsideofmaths

4 жыл бұрын

​@@geraldsittly1512 You don't do this because it only makes sense when Δ is invertible.

This channel is gold

Always interesting, thank you.

Thinking of the Structure of curved space time on the smallest particles is crazy. Quantizing gravity and space time may be wrong crazy. NICE VIDEO.

this channel produces the best information ever thank you space time

@UniversalSouls

5 жыл бұрын

Thunderbolts Of The Gods SAFIRE Project Electric Universe Model... I don't dislike this guy in the video he's actually quite good at explaining how all of these accepted theories are actually a bunch of bullshit... Look at the Thunderbolts Project

It took around 100 years from Galileo to Newton and 150 years from Newton to Einstein. So it seems we are only in half way to find the unification theory. What it seems like that we need to be really familiar with a theory before we can expand on it.

@aduts1177

3 жыл бұрын

Your saviour is here.....

That was an excellent presentation. Not sure I followed any of it but you definitely got me the closest...lol

Love this show, thank you!

The fact that human beings have discovered all this so far just blows my mind. And yet, we're not even CLOSE to coming up with a theory for everything

My question comes very late: how much energy-mass does a black hole have distributed in simple rest mass and rotational energy? Rotational energy must be there from simple momentum conservation perspective if the same conservation applies as it does in neutron stars. And what about mergers do the momenta add up cancel or does gravitational wave emission interfere with the rotational energy components of the merging black holes?

@tariqali07860

2 жыл бұрын

It takes a paradigm shift to move from one era to the next. In 1904 humanity moved a giant step forward with the publication of Einsteins paper on relativity. Today a paradigm shift is needed to move humanity to the next level, we need the theory of quantum gravity. This is a 4 part video that tries to conceptualise a theory that solves a multitude of major physics problems. Five of these are explained in these 4 videos. For a single theory to solve so many physics problems is unheard of. So please concentrate on the consept and not the delivery. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lnqou5qMZ7fLk7w.html

I had a theory a long while ago that dictates gravity is a form of perpetual momentum. Like think of a bullet flying through the space and it keeps going in that one direction. What force particle is being used to carry that bullet through space in that direction? What about centrifugal forces? What particle force is used for that? When thinking about all forces that ties to visible mass, it doesn't make any sense if its tied to properties of their particles.. because all those forces are masses that effects other masses. With the knowledge of quantum physics, you'd think we should have been able to spot gravitons by now as we considered it to be a fundamental force and not something elusive.

In my opinion, the connection between the general relativity and the quantum theory can only be achieved by the existance of the "Higgs bosons"... The black hole or Hawking radiation is the thermal radiation tunneling through the black holes gravitational potential... A third version of Heisenberg uncertainty relation can also be expressed as : □E . □x < hc

This is something I've been contemplating for quite some time. I am currently in high school and want to be a physicist as an adult. I've been researching quantum mechanics on a semi-regular basis (at least one study session per month). I lack a some of the foundation of these upper level sciences, but that's because I'm only a sophomore 😅. I have recently been looking into some studies on "cell consciousness" and it's correlation to the quantum field. I actually made some of my own hypotheses on different topics based on everything else I know. Just to throw this in the mix, even before I knew it was a thing, I've been contemplating a theory of everything. Before I even made it to middle school science class I was contemplating how the universe worked. It's like a passion. Anyway, in the studies on "cell consciousness" they proposed the quantum field as an intricate brain, so to say, of the cell. You mentioned quantizing gravity. I feel like you can't really explain everything properly unless you quantize everything. Take into account the fields we can quantize and those that we can't. We can quantize fields like the electromagnetic field, as you said, because those fields are governed by the laws of physics proceding the quantum real. Our universe, as we know it at least, exists proceeding the quantum real. Think of the laws of physics more as dimensions. Imagine the things affected by the laws of physics the first dimension, the laws of physics as the second dimension, and quantum mechanics as the third. From both a practical and a mathematical standpoint, we can observe the one dimensional object moving about our two dimensional universe, but we are completely oblivious to the two dimensional plane our one dimensional like universe exists on. I don't mean oblivious in the sense that we are unaware, I mean that we have no direct observation of quantum physics, only observations of the effects of quantum physics. If you were to shoot a bb gun into a room full of objects from a random, unknown point in the room, without observing it directly happening or influencing anything within the room, so long as you knew everything, every single force acting on the object, the exact position of every object beforehand, as well as every possible contributing variable, you could figure out the point that bb started from, as well as the exactly path it took, as well as how much energy it started with, where the energy was distributed, etc. Apply this principal to the laws of physics, and we can observe the effects of physics and even create equations that model everything, but we can't directly observe it. I may be rambling because it's very late but at the time I understood what I meant so this next part might be a bit confusing because it was sort of consciousness focused.. our universe is a consciousness governed by the quantum field. The quantum field is folded and put together in a way that allows every particle to flow from point a to point b on any scale. Because quantum mechanics implies uncertainty, the particles could take any path from point a to point b. Not necessarily on a larger scale, but a smaller scale that fits into a larger path, sort of point a to b to c to d etc to infinity. The only reason that consciousness exists and that universes and dimensions exist is because there is a larger dimension or a higher consciousness to observe it. The quantum field is what "observes" out universe. Our universe is observing infinitely smaller dimensions, consciousnesses, etc, similar to how the quantum field is just one of infinite quantum fields within a higher dimension being observed by whatever would be the quantum field above that universe, a kilo-quantum field? Anyway the cycle would go on infinitely in either direction. I could dive a lot deeper but I need sleep and it's late and this is literally just a KZread comment on an old video that will probably go unnoticed.

@alanlowey2769

3 жыл бұрын

Do you think it's possible for dark matter to exist at the centre of the Earth?⁉️

@hawsroy

2 жыл бұрын

hey i noticed! and i think you clearly are a smart person who will eventually figure all this out and more. just put that energy into studying and you’ll go wherever you want to :)

@magicpotion8

2 жыл бұрын

I like your theory - especially the part about consciousness. Have you elaborated on this any more?

@worldofbodybuilding111

3 ай бұрын

have you looked into it more , im interested

Best way to start flame war on most threads: Anything politics/religion Best way to start flame war on Space Time: "Einstein is wrong"

@diamondsmasher

5 жыл бұрын

Iain Ballas Einstein did nothing wrong.

@tabularasa0606

5 жыл бұрын

Einstein was wrong, we just don't know how yet.

@thstroyur

5 жыл бұрын

@@tabularasa0606 He insisted too much on Mach's principle; IMO

@Ni999

5 жыл бұрын

NaN I believe that bias is not your friend in seeking to understand the universe.

@thorr18BEM

5 жыл бұрын

He claimed his cosmological constant was the "biggest blunder" of his life, so he admitted to being falable. I guess when people tried to bring it back because of dark matter they were claiming he was wrong to claim it was a blunder. So, he was either wrong the first time or wrong to say it was wrong. Either way, Einstein was wrong :)

I think your content is amazing! I work in finance and have a personal interest in QM. I spend my day describing financial concepts for lay people in a way they can conceptualize with fewer industry terms (rather, I mention them, but they are somewhat muted in my explanation). I'd love to be involved in explaining some of these concepts for lay people using allegory for complex problems, as I myself sometimes have to watch two to three times to conceptualize this.

I appreciate your "squaring the circle" reference

Unless I misunderstood something, when you described the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, it sounded like you were saying that it was a result of the nature of taking measurements, as opposed to something intrinsic to quantum mechanics. Was that a mistake or am I just not getting something? And yes, I do understand that you need to interact with something to observe it. It's just that I thought that was something separate from uncertainty

@danieljensen2626

5 жыл бұрын

It's sort of both. Uncertainty is a fundamental part of waves, even ordinary waves like sound waves. The shorter an impulse of sound is the more frequencies it contains, whereas the more precisely you narrow down the frequency of a sound the longer the signal has to be. You can actually derive the uncertainty principle in QM just from that fact. So the uncertainty is fundamental to the way you measure things (especially because everything is a wave so you can't possibly measure anything without using waves). But technically yes, quantum mechanics says even if you had a magic measuring device that didn't use waves the result would be the same.

@timhaldane7588

5 жыл бұрын

It is fundamental. It also has to do with the nature of measurement. Both are fundamentally the same thing. Quantum mechanics is about fundamental objects exchanging information. Information is carried via the exchange of particles (typically bosons). Nature only "knows" about itself via these interactions, where the information is exchanged. You could call these interactions measurements.

@Blox117

5 жыл бұрын

even with ideal instruments it is still probabilistic

@Eireternal

5 жыл бұрын

couldnt you measure position by measuring the warping of spacetime around said particle..if we could measure something so miniscule.

@TheJayCZ

5 жыл бұрын

To measure warping of spacetime you still need something that warps it itself. Also, you'd be trying to measure sub plank length distances, especially so if you tried to detect particles.

I'm just here for the beard.

@thstroyur

5 жыл бұрын

But is the beard here for you?

@user-vz7mu4su9n

5 жыл бұрын

Beards are always there for you.

Of course right out of thought, and yesterday's example. I have a tinted window car. Close it's not easy to see in. At a distance , it's easy to see right through where the light comes through. It has a angle directive on clock work when the sun shines and when it gets dark. So it seems that distance, energy level and location shows some advantage. I look at open clear front window. If it were tinted, idk if I'd have same visual, even if angle and distance were good. At our point, the most recognized transparent visual is earth.

I'm curious... are we *really* a few equations away from understanding reality? Or rather, is bridging the two theories all that's needed? While I understand that GR and QM explain a lot and that we're missing something in the mix... maybe it's just me framing the situation a certain way in my mind, but I really feel like any math we create/discover to bridge that gap will still leave us with more questions about reality on higher scales. Sure, we might learn more about relatively local things like black holes or quantum gravity but it will fail to answer questions like "what actually happens at the core of the black hole?, "why does anything exist at all?", "is the universe infinite?" Let's say for a moment, we bridged the gap with some math - what kinds of practical issues with that solve? Will humanity rejoice in unison or will there just be a bunch of scientists as excited as a Marvel fanboy at a new movie release? Will that excitement wane after the discovery while the scientists look for the next cool thing?

@JesseRousher36

2 жыл бұрын

I have thought this exact same thing after much time theorizing a fix to the GR-QM problem. The problem seems to reside at this point as, "You don't know, what you do not know" and we will not know what comes next until we are at that point, or simply just discover another problem.

@chrisjarmain

Жыл бұрын

I thought this also. It depends on what implications the two (gr and qm) have and what the unification of the two may mean to humanity. If quantum gravity was to be solved and one day it will, it would allow us to understand a lot more than we do now. Perhaps give some insight into how the universe began and so forth. It's exciting but would again create more questions depending on what the unification implies.