The Romanov's were much better looking than Britain's Royals.

@edmarkpolicarpiopineda4541

3 жыл бұрын

I noticed that too.

@berserk3195

3 жыл бұрын

True

@reardelt

3 жыл бұрын

So when will saudi arabia get a democracy?

@arandomseal4793

3 жыл бұрын

You wot m8?

@khalidhakami928

3 жыл бұрын

@@reardelt we dont want a democracy

The tsars children are related to Britain’s present day monarch through their ancestor Queen Victoria

@isprikitikburkabush6200

4 жыл бұрын

Tsar Nicholas and the then King George of Britain look like twins

@almalayuwiyyah2512

4 жыл бұрын

German kaiser, Russian tsar and British monarch we're all related.

@Valencetheshireman927

4 жыл бұрын

@JT X- You believe in some utter nonsense!

@zerinzinia8660

4 жыл бұрын

Ok, so that's y Britishers hate communism so much?!

@freeunderratedmusic4273

4 жыл бұрын

Jjt X Crazy conspiracy guy

" you can only be president for 8 years " Putin: lets turn that 8 to the side and now its infinite 😈

@Amitgupta-uq2up

3 жыл бұрын

Copied *

@chrisgriffin9164

3 жыл бұрын

Just like his Buddy, Asaad Bashar and his father before him. a evil sickness that drowns the hearts of the peoples thoughts.

@outrageousgamer315

3 жыл бұрын

@@chrisgriffin9164 keep crying

@reginald_playzz

3 жыл бұрын

"One eight, another eight, nonconsecutive terms! See! I'm not violating the rules!"

@sabrinanascimento5248

3 жыл бұрын

😩

When Nicholas Romanov was crowned Tsar of Russia in 1894, he seemed bewildered. “What is going to happen to me…to all Russia?” he asked an advisor when he assumed the throne. “I am not prepared to be Tsar. I never even wanted to become one.”

@Orto-jj2di

2 жыл бұрын

Seems like her was wise enough to know that

@raccoondon488

2 жыл бұрын

@@Orto-jj2di …..her ? 😂😂😂 just kidding. I couldn’t resist. 😂😂👍👍🎉🎉

@Orto-jj2di

2 жыл бұрын

@@raccoondon488 😅😅

@lepetitchat123

2 жыл бұрын

The tragedy of being forced to do things against their will

@astralaurora4165

2 жыл бұрын

that’s nice, he also killed thousands

Nicolas's wife and daughters were gorgeous

@itsokay2606

5 жыл бұрын

The son as well

@FlowerTrollSan

4 жыл бұрын

He was quite handsome as well. 😁

@Jonetwothrree4

4 жыл бұрын

Their fucking dead lol

@barbiquearea

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jonetwothrree4 They are forever young.

@mustardbottle8663

4 жыл бұрын

BrUhMaN69 they well got banged

its so sad because 2 days prior to their execution, the bolsheviks offered the tsar's family over to the tsar's cousin, george V of england, and he declined. after receiving the news of their deaths, george went with his family to an orthodox church and prayed there all day for forgiveness

@martinjenkins6467

2 жыл бұрын

He was worried it could cause Revolution in England. The 20s Were a challenging time in England. There was the great strike of 26 And morals were evolving in the Working class.

@sofiabessonova2214

2 жыл бұрын

@@martinjenkins6467 it was the reason why in the end he was killed with all his family and all relatives. There were cruel murders.

@tangaz5819

2 жыл бұрын

@@martinjenkins6467 Morals? Or they just didn’t want to have to be peasants anymore?

@sunnymitra6372

2 жыл бұрын

@@martinjenkins6467 It also shows how Evil Lenin actually was........but what's surprising is that the Marxists around the World Justifies the Killings of Tsar Nicolas 2 and his Entire Family.

@JaydenGK2004

2 жыл бұрын

That’s really heartbreaking 😔

Just to clarify: the White Army wasn’t necessarily loyal to Tzar Nicholas II. They were merely against the Bolsheviks and weren’t really trying to restore the Russian Empire.

@here_we_go_again2571

3 жыл бұрын

The Russian Federation is the Russian empire under another name (as was the USSR -- New rulers same empire)

@idontknowwhatmypfpis1918

3 жыл бұрын

One of the reasons why the Whits failed

@pavelmalikov5321

2 жыл бұрын

They dont do research. By 1917 everyone was Anti-Tzar.

@ekesandras1481

2 жыл бұрын

The white army, that threatened to take Yekaterinburg (and did so a few days after) was the Czech legion. The red guards, that kept Tsar Nicolai in the Ipatiev House, were mostly communist Hungarians. Both groups were recruted from captured Austro-Hungarian POWs, that were freed after the Februar Revolution.

@raritica8409

2 жыл бұрын

My Great Great Granduncle Abram Teisen, was a White Army medic. Because of his actions and bravery he personally recieved a medal from Tzar Nicholas 2. It is now of course a proud family heirloom, but anyways there was closeness between the Czar and his soldiers. his journals talk in much greater detail.

Well it's simple, remove the "Ras" from Rasputin and you have Putin

@eqbertfite2455

3 жыл бұрын

But wasn't Rasputin one of the main reasons the monarchy ended?

@shaypatra9840

3 жыл бұрын

@@eqbertfite2455 Hey you did not get it. HE WAS IMMORTAL.

@obe1withtheforce785

3 жыл бұрын

And his first name is Vladimir like Prince Charles' Great grandaddy!!

@obe1withtheforce785

3 жыл бұрын

@Meph Lest Pretty sure Vlad was short for Vladimir

@ZACHANDJACKSZACHSMAFIA

2 жыл бұрын

True he is a relative of blood to rather putin, marx, maybe even stalins own sons descendent?

France literally did the same thing ~130 years earlier.

@here_we_go_again2571

5 жыл бұрын

The French Revolution was led by a mob (that soon canabilized its own) The Russian Bolshevik Revolution was financed by International bankers and the German monarchy. The goal of Germany was to expand eastward into Russian- owned lands Austria also wanted to expand east (into the Ukraine)

@padlocktails26

5 жыл бұрын

Here_We_Go_Again2 look how that played out for them 😂

@thekingshussar1808

3 жыл бұрын

@@padlocktails26 Total failure. France took a strong leader (Napoleon) to fix all that and making a monarchy of his own.

@nosh8147

3 жыл бұрын

@@thekingshussar1808 It wasn't a monarchy tho; there was no line of succession, the emperor would usually choose his successor like in the Roman Empire after Octavian

@thekingshussar1808

3 жыл бұрын

@@nosh8147 Yes there was, Napoleon only had a son who became an Austrian prince (Napoleon II) to which made Austrians have more favour for Bonaparte France as they would have ties with the powerful nation if Napoleon II ascended to the throne, but unfortunately Napoleon lost all power by late 1812 and 1815, discontinuing Austria's plans of such and Napoleon II died young in 1830s of tuberculosis. Austria and France allied against Russia in 1812, you know.

I just read the entire article of the romanovs on wiki a month ago. The diary of the Tsar’s daughters paint a story of innocent girls who just want the simple of joy of life yet was cursed by their heritage. May they rest in peace.

"There were many bad things about the Czar's regime, but he inherited an autocracy and his acts are now being seen in perspective and in comparison to the terrible crimes committed by the Soviets." - Nikolai Tolstoy

@danielwymer1580

3 жыл бұрын

Remember Ivan the Terrible, he ruled before the tsars, He was 10 times worse than the Soviets

@stefan5573

3 жыл бұрын

@@oliverroberts7490 in the 1500s or something...

@debaratimukherjee3022

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielwymer1580 bruh ivan the terrible was the 1st tsar "Tsar Ivan II"

@daseapickleofjustice7231

3 жыл бұрын

What crimes of the USSR?

@personbob8691

3 жыл бұрын

@@daseapickleofjustice7231 exactly they did nothing wrong other than be an alternative system lol

Now in 2022 this brilliant analysis of Putin proves all too true! The fact that England refused to give sanctuary to the Romanov family is absolutely unforgivable and it seems that some crimes and indiscretions of the past are so great they continue to come back to haunt us and play out throughout the annals of time.

@testla3383

2 жыл бұрын

it sounds like we never know the truth because he version I read is that England welcomed Nicolas II to come, he's King George V's cousin, but the Bolsheviks delayed that because they didn't want a potential exile government controlled by England.

@ysb08

2 жыл бұрын

@@testla3383 The version I read was that, as you said, George V welcomed Nicholas II, but out of fear of an communist revolution in the war torn England, the government pushed George V to decline the offer

@tdsims1963

2 жыл бұрын

@@ysb08 I have never heard of this version! I am now curious. Was there reason to believe that a communist revolt would have been successful in the G.B of that time? I would love it if you gave me the source of your info. Can I find the book easily? I don't care if I have to translate it. Thanks in advance for your reply😊👍.

No one: Americans: Russia is bad

@bijayshrestha3377

5 жыл бұрын

This is a british channel

@NikolaAvramov

5 жыл бұрын

It's rather: British: Russian man bad.

@iseegoodandbad6758

4 жыл бұрын

Sadly we Brits tend to tag along with the yanks even though we Brits are more intelligent and aware! It's our government. Most of us Brits love Russia and find we have a lot in common.

@cecileyoras6671

4 жыл бұрын

Sarah Sally Fake. Obviously a Russian bot posting from Moscow

@SavyoMouraOFC

4 жыл бұрын

@@cecileyoras6671 I'm not fake. ._.

Romanov: *built a powerful russia* Putin: *also built a powerful russia* Westerners: coincidence?

@heythataintme7330

5 жыл бұрын

Powerful???? Ahaahahahbahabahahaha.. Nice joke

@alexisarteev-salazar9247

5 жыл бұрын

Nika Kim I’m reading your post out pound and it sounds as if you’re having an asthma attack.

@williamaldridge975

5 жыл бұрын

Atomic Apple powerful? I live in Russia and it may be perceived as powerful in foreign countries, but our middle wage is about 300-400 dollars. More than half of them spends for food and for housing and communal services. Pension age for men will be 65 soon, but men's life expectancy is 66.5. Do you think we're proud of our political power in foreign countries? Most of our population just wants 1000$ wage and nothing else.

@here_we_go_again2571

5 жыл бұрын

Autocracy seems to agree with the Russian empire.

@riazonbin9931

5 жыл бұрын

@@vvp_rus Да, благодаря такому "нищему говну" наша страна и держится, и существует это "нищее говно" под названием россияне уже с 16 века

Nicholas 2 was more of a family man than a ruler who never had his ear to the ground

@baldmanforehead7204

4 жыл бұрын

Hes too weak

@bbblueee8282

3 жыл бұрын

He and Alexandra had never been trained to be tsar and tsarina, they didn’t know how to properly run a country

@ashketchum5466

3 жыл бұрын

They should been actors instead.

@danielforeroc

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, he didn't want to become Tsar, but he also feared the change of the autocracy, he was raised by the same tutor as his father, and he was afraid of reforming after seeing his grandfather dying in the Winter Palace.

@kirilll7806

2 жыл бұрын

if only alexander the 3 lived a few more decades...

The Economist & the ghosts of independent reporting

@johnarnoldhungary

4 жыл бұрын

So everything that doesnt support ur opinion is not independent?

@orangebanana845

4 жыл бұрын

Media with alternative point of view: *exists* Russian Bots: ZIONIST PROPAGANDA!!! FUNDED BY BRITISH GOVERNMENT

@nuri2318

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnarnoldhungary it's not about supporting someone's opinion or not but about 2 things Ideological apparatus and circulation of knowledge. West has always had a way of hegemonizing knowledge and thereby power. What I mean is that they document everything foreign to them as negation of their principles and their social formation, with a bias that is rooted in their own history and ideology. So historically creation of western societies is not same as others in East or middle East or Asia . But they always appropriate and then misrepresent others. They did that during colonial era and they continue doing so in globalised, neo imperialistic world. In today's world, media and social media both play a very important role in fashioning popular beliefs and polarising beliefs. Those from West have access to other parts of world only through popular media houses and most of them are again western. Media is a ideological apparatus essentially. And of course the same would apply to others as well. Russia might also have such media houses.It's not like Russia has no problems too but then Western media houses only portray such things. Like only portarying poverty of India and Nothing or not much about developing India.

@alejandrosotomartin9720

4 жыл бұрын

The Economist, owned by the same family of open Satanists that funded Marx to spread garbage all across Europe and that created Israel as their personal farmland.

@quanbrooklynkid7776

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnarnoldhungary hahaha

Putin, at this point of time, isn't the worst autocrat to rule Russia … Jus' sayin' ;-\ There is something about Russia's physical and psychological composition that seems to embrace autocracy. Perhaps it is because the country is so diverse and so large; that liberal Western-style politics would, most likely, lead to secessionist movements and fragmentation. Russia is not a country of immigrants; the various ethnic groups have been there for thousands of years. They can legitimately claim their native territory as their own.

@shawnullerup6844

5 жыл бұрын

Catherine the Great was a friend to Voltaire, who implored her to transition towards a constitutional system. To that end, she convened an elected convention to hammer out the details. She did not interfere, but did observe in secret. After weeks of bickering she determined that there was no way to employ democratic republicanism in her nation, that it took a strong ruler from on high to keep order. Read Robert Massie's biography of her, and his fascinating, detailed bio of Peter the Great. Putin does not wish to be Nicholas, nor Stalin. He wants to be Peter.

@Manuel_Fal_Conde

4 жыл бұрын

​ Vaira .123 India has been a colony of great Britain for a long time, and never participated in major wars. Foolish to compare two extremely different people. You would compare the English to the people of Nigeria.

@Anna_M_numbers

4 жыл бұрын

russian politicians have been ruining russian`s mentality, creating a strong demand in dictator

@DerricktheWhite

4 жыл бұрын

@@shawnullerup6844 just read Hobbes

@peaceandlove544

4 жыл бұрын

I totally agree I just came from Russia and I fully confirmed what ypu say here.

The Tsars daughters were beautiful .

@lorranlxcrrer1158

5 жыл бұрын

@@Cov1ngtonsGhOst u sure? I don't think so

@sebagonzalez9127

5 жыл бұрын

@@Cov1ngtonsGhOst that is a lie..

@lorranlxcrrer1158

5 жыл бұрын

@SiegeVirtual Good things IDGAF about u

@NishiMiyamura

5 жыл бұрын

Anastasia was ready to get shoot wasn't scared like the others

@user-vx2ku8lq5k

5 жыл бұрын

Were? Are !

Russian people loves a "Tsar" like figure. They need a strongman in power to feel themselves safe...

0:47 Why did those soldiers randomly start making out? lol.

@philippg1390

3 жыл бұрын

they didn´t start making out, this was the "Brotherhood kiss" used by all communist countries, close to the french version

@schmidty4992

3 жыл бұрын

In communism u have to share those pretty lips

@cheshirecat7819

3 жыл бұрын

@@philippg1390 gotta kiss your homies goodbye before participating in a civil war

@daseapickleofjustice7231

3 жыл бұрын

The power of socialism, nobody is lonely you are all comrades

@pofromteletubbies1243

3 жыл бұрын

@@philippg1390 I saw the poster of that ussr leader kissing some old dude , was it the same thing?

Yeltsin was so democratic that he shelled his own democratically-elected parliament when they refused to change the constitution to suit his benefit. Yeltsin was so democratic that he rigged the 1996 election in his favour with funds from President Clinton. Yeltsin was such a great leader that he drowned his nation's economy below WW2 levels and did nothing to try bring it back up. Thank you, Boris Yeltsin, for letting your people live through hell! Thank you for bringing your country to the lowest of lows! Is this what democracy and Western values represent?

@brandondavidson4085

5 жыл бұрын

Right. Russia was at its lowest point economically and socially during Yelstin's rule in the '90s. Also, you try converting a country that has been under Fascist rule for nearly 70 years (4 generations) into a free-market economy with perfect regulations.

@samovarmaker9673

5 жыл бұрын

@@brandondavidson4085 The USSR was under Socialist rule, but you are right.

@brandondavidson4085

5 жыл бұрын

Samovar maker (1) Socialism isn't a government. (2) The USSR was not Socialist, neither was Vietnam or is North Kora and China; These countries all had or still have a fascist authoritarian autocratic centralized economy, where the government controls ALL the means of production and consumption. Fascism and socialism have become dirty words in economic discussions because of the red scare, but they still have meaning, and they're not the same.

@samovarmaker9673

5 жыл бұрын

@@brandondavidson4085 Authoritarian, yes, but I don't understand why you call them fascist.

@brandondavidson4085

5 жыл бұрын

@@samovarmaker9673 Fascism: An authoritarian reactionary movement against progressivism in a country by which a small minority of powerful people pull together the support of the political conservatives and those in the middle, in order to establish for themselves an autocratic state. Hitler and Stalin were the same kind of fascists, but because we were allied with Russia in World War 2, we had to call them something else, "communist". Then afterwards, during the Red Scare era, they became the enemy.

Russia has really amazing history from the Rurik dynasty to the Tsardom to the Revolution, Soviet Union and then Russian Federation.

@TsarOfRuss

6 жыл бұрын

Notice how the british commentator is fast to condemn Russia's last monarch, but when it comes to Queen of England who murdered millions in Africa and America .. the news is always positive

@polishherowitoldpilecki5521

6 жыл бұрын

Russia does have amazing history for some reason I think soviet history part is really terrible and culturally murdered russsian culture.

@kylemiles448

6 жыл бұрын

Solomon Black Russia it’s amazing country

@OkieJames

6 жыл бұрын

I would say overall a very complex and in-depth​ history. The Soviet era was by a far very dark period but they did modernize a country overnight... History is always what you make it some good some bad a lot of Grey...

@rikuvakevainen6157

6 жыл бұрын

Where does Russian schools' history books begin the history of Russia? From Kiev, from Ruhrik or perhaps from the ancient trieps?

He is even built a palace for himself...

"Infantile" : Is how the Pope described Russia's justification for invasion of Ukraine.

@creativeandaliveat65

2 жыл бұрын

Like his counterpart who tried out leadership in the US empire, Putin is also simultaneously infantile and senile. But above all: cruel. Not a pretty picture.

''White army, loyal to Nikolas the second'' - seriously? Go back to school! Ps: instead of arguing with 20 people, i rather add some info here. 1. General Ruzsky and A.Guchkov were the ones who insisted Tsar to sign manifesto and that act was supported in that by bunch of other figures who would join the white army shortly after. 2. While some (whites) could sympathize Tsar and monarchy, most the white leaders either remembered Tsar in a negative light like A.Denikin or cared about their own goals like Kolchak. 3. As ''bbonner422'' stated below, ''The white army was fractured into various factions ranging from almost fascist in beliefs to people who wanted a democratic republic. The reason why the Soviets won was because they had more of a united front against the white army''. Many people tend to idealize (whites) for some reason. Their scale of terror in many cases wasn't inferior to the (reds) and even surpassing the (reds) it when speaking mainly about Kolchak. 4. By the time execution did take place, Tsar was left alone by pretty much everyone. His generals didn't care, his British cousin didn't care and most importantly his people didn't care.

@Mrcrunch93

6 жыл бұрын

Tjecktjeck were they not?

@Tjecktjeck

6 жыл бұрын

Christian Caven Nope. Technically they were the ones who dismissed Nikolas from the Tsar post lol. Ps: if anything, they were loyal to Admiral Kolchak.

@khalidalali186

6 жыл бұрын

True that! And he was a conservative who believed that Russia should be a republic and decide for itself whether or not it wanted the Tsar or any Tsar for that matter back in power.

@ConvexandDutch

6 жыл бұрын

The whole video was content-less and misleading...

@luizhumberto7404

6 жыл бұрын

The whole video is a festival of stupidity

I wonder how different history would have been if Alexander III had had a long life span.

@outofthisworld2651

6 жыл бұрын

wholeNwon It gives the impression that Putin actually is influenced by Alexander the III than his son. Yes it would have been a very diffrent situation if The III didnt die so early. Had he lived it would have been obvious with another killing attempt from Lenin.

@RPDBY

6 жыл бұрын

wholeNwon wasn't he an alcoholic? It wouldn't matter much

@wholeNwon

6 жыл бұрын

Not to my knowledge, though the Russians have a long history of heavy drinking. I doubt that his wife would have approved.

@outofthisworld2651

6 жыл бұрын

wholeNwon Yes unfortionly he was an alcoholic and died of a kidney damage obviously from drinking also due to a stabbing by Lenins older brother Alexandr Ulyanov a few years earlier ( So it wouldnt have been a surprise if Lenin later would have attempt the same if the III would've continued to live.) And to Alexander the III also known as 'The peacekeeper' unfortune- Nikolaj wasnt prepared to rule Russia with the rising communism. But the story would've been very interesting otherwise.

@RPDBY

6 жыл бұрын

wholeNwon well, then you definitely need to update your knowledge, that will save you from making stupid claims

love the way you blame the Problem in Syrian on Russia 😂😂. they fixed the problem causes by America again

@bigballetlover

4 жыл бұрын

I thought the same. The Russians are there at the invitation of Assad in an attempt to get rid of ISIS and the like.

@marisamartin3664

3 жыл бұрын

You may be right there. I feel the West pushed Bashir into the arms of Russia

@BRPJR

3 жыл бұрын

Merican gov't should focus on the communists from the East and ffs stop being delusional about Russia. You might wanna extend NATO's influence among Asian countries. Your gatekeeper Israel will not be able to hold it if communists from the east influences the middle east.

@BRPJR

3 жыл бұрын

@Decimus Maximus isnt power same as communist influence? Don't be naive. It's all the same. And how exactly russia is a threat to democracy? Is democracy even existent?

@BRPJR

3 жыл бұрын

@Decimus Maximus you are not getting the bigger picture. Have a nice a day.

He died an unknown hero and none will really know the real reason why. Rip king 👑 now with the king of kings

If only Tsar Alexander II managed to pass the reforms to make Russia a constitutional monarchy... the Tsars would have been saved, as well as democracy...

Between World War One, The Russian Revolution, World War Two and Joseph Stalin, The Collapse of the USSR, The Financial Crisis of 1997 and its Demographic Crisis, Russia has truly been through some hardship. Russia is truly a nation that knows the meaning of perseverance. As for the video, typical bias against Russia.

@crismagogamer9391

4 жыл бұрын

Rusia es un pais de cosas raras, literal

@tk_2378

4 жыл бұрын

Junokaii And they‘ll face real problems with the aging population soon. They just not getting enough children and over 60% are women they also have thanks to Stalin a huge men lack.

@Benjamin-iu5ys

4 жыл бұрын

True

@user-bw1xg1nm7o

4 жыл бұрын

@@tk_2378 Lol every single industrialized country has an aging population and a birth rate below 2. All of europe, usa, canada, china,japan, south korea. All of them

@tk_2378

4 жыл бұрын

1996 з3 Yeah it’s true and the problems will come with it soon. In about 15-20 years. Japan for example don’t take any immigrants and they try new things to make people get 2.1 children at least. They tryin‘ 3 for every women and it may work out. But they‘ll never ever take immigrants that’s how Japan is and want so be.

Yet Russia is a saner and more stable nation compared to the USA

@marisamartin3664

3 жыл бұрын

Well perhaps at the moment...

@growthxcentric562

3 жыл бұрын

@@marisamartin3664 perhaps...

@growthxcentric562

3 жыл бұрын

@Gleb B. / Глеб Б. at least someone's in control

@growthxcentric562

3 жыл бұрын

@Gleb B. / Глеб Б. Research and compare

@selimfurkandalgic9548

2 жыл бұрын

Umm... I am not sure about that...

The Romanovs fell because of the three hundred year curse of Marina Mnishek. In 1613, after the execution of her child, she said this:"The Romanovs will rule Russia for 300 years. The heirs will not die by their own death. This will happen until all the Romanovs die."This led to palace coups and revolutions, and subsequently, the execution of almost all members of the Romanov House and the creation of the USSR.The USSR was actually created for the complete destruction of the Romanovs and other oldest Russian dynasties, but this did not happen, and in 1991 the union broke up.

Czar Nikolai Romanov's biggest weakness was his wife. She was a very bad influence on him, she brought in the mystic Rasputin who ruined the reputation of the imperial family, she also gave her husband very bad advice. The two men who could have saved him: Count Sergei Witte, and Pyotr Stolypin were both dead by 1915. These men were extremely competent politicians. Sergei Witte strongly advised the Czar not to go to war against Germany, but his wife did not like the kaiser, also the British and the French put huge pressure on him to go to war against Germany despite the Treaty of Bjorka he signed with kaiser Wilhelm. Wilhelm loved Nicholas more than any other other relative, he never wanted to go to war with Russia. His true sentiments are revealed in their private telegrams, but Wilhelm's own government over-ruled him.

@lindsayives4915

2 жыл бұрын

Thnkyou for the story

@fgfgfgfgf2919

2 жыл бұрын

how true is this ?

@sofiabessonova2214

2 жыл бұрын

@@lindsayives4915 not all the truth. Stolypin was killed in the Kiev's Opera Theater by Bagrov, Jewish man.

@Ari-ge5cp

2 жыл бұрын

This helped answer my question. So sad:(

@kristianfeliz213

2 жыл бұрын

@Nogent Nothing can bring down your popularity than losing 2 wars under your watch as a czar.

"When we do it, don't you dare mention morals and laws" - The West

@ZMorpheus

4 жыл бұрын

"We got Bagh Daddy. Then, we took our troops out. But we're keeping the Oil..." - Orange King (for security reasons, ofc) ("If someone else wants it, they have to fight us for it" oh nvm)

@myeffulgenthairyballssay9358

4 жыл бұрын

@Enkhee B I dunno. I'm a Westerner but we are not all (entirely) brainwashed moral supremacists. I admit we have a serious moral supremacist problem polluting the western mindscape, but it is not ubiquitous. We are not all mass media assimilated Borg zombie automatrons. Indeed, many, many of us are sick of it, hence the recent UK election, UK leave EU referendum and Trump victory are in essence, protests against the moral supremacist screamers that demand to dictate our values at us.

@noblechief4023

4 жыл бұрын

I rather be in a nation that relies on a monarch then. A nation that relies on the promises of a man

@enkheeb2354

4 жыл бұрын

Liev Semenov one man with many ego problems may spell more trouble

It's a shame that whenever one nation tries to be "stronger" it usually means war...

“Vladimir” actually means “Of Great Power”

@alexalexin9491

3 жыл бұрын

I possess the world - that's what it means.

Because of the crimes of Stalin and Lenin, the crimes of Tsar Nicholas are often forgotten. Thousands of people were killed by the Cossacks in putting down peaceful protests, there were pogroms across the country and finally there is WW1 for which the Tsar is partially responsible. His family did not get what they deserved but before feeling sorry for him, think of some of the victims of his rule.

@cmefistofel

6 жыл бұрын

you can do some research: how many terrorists were sentenced to death, and what did the courts and prisons look like in the Russian Empire

@smooth_sundaes5172

6 жыл бұрын

You are right but at that time Czars (or Tsars) were entirely autocratic with the power of life and death over ordinary people. Revolution was inevitable but what the Bolsheviks did was murder however you look at it. However, such has been the outcome of many Revolutions including France and even England with the execution of Charles I.

@VanlifewithAlan

6 жыл бұрын

I am not justifying Bolshevik crimes and certainly as you say the Terror followed the French Revolution with a new king (called the Emperor) coming only 15 years later. And England did not do too well either - after a long civil war to get rid of the king, his son came back 11 years after his execution. I would argue that if the Tsar had gone down the reform route as his grandfather attempted then it might have been a completely different outcome. I think that this is a subject too long for a complete answer but I may do a film of it on my channel sometime in the future!

@cannancursed820

6 жыл бұрын

Alan Heath Lenin's own brother was one of them. kinda makes it hard to blame him. Stalin can die in a hole. but Lenin tried... the problem was, he was only means to break the chains. not to be the bearer of the new ones.

@VanlifewithAlan

6 жыл бұрын

Good point - was it the hanging of his brother that pushed Lenin into doing what he did?

Correction: The family and servants were sawed into small pieces, and dumped in some form of acid, then burned, and after that the remains were left in a nearby abandoned mine.

@theemperor-wh40k18

3 жыл бұрын

They were shot.

@jont6370

3 жыл бұрын

@@theemperor-wh40k18 They were shot *FIRST*

@coniston3106

3 жыл бұрын

What has humanity come into, that is barbaric.

@yom0mma214

3 жыл бұрын

@@coniston3106 this happens in mexico atleast once a month believe it or not

@Phoenix_eleven

2 жыл бұрын

Wrong I believe

0:43 «Июль 1918» Вау, Заранее построили мавзолей для Ленина. Что бы потом голову не ломать)))

@Arthur-sd2ul

3 жыл бұрын

Думаю это просто рандомный кадр, связанный с текстом только косвенно.

@Jukanella

3 жыл бұрын

@@Arthur-sd2ul Это просто кринжовое популистское видео с кучей фактических ошибок

@user-xq4so6jr8u

3 жыл бұрын

Белые не были все поголовно за царя , это факт , тут же оговорки сплошные .

@kirilll7806

2 жыл бұрын

@Kryptonian bruh

"Putin embraces the soviet past" You mean its belief of a unified state and belief? Yes Communism and marxism? Absolutely not.

@mashka1572

3 жыл бұрын

it's not like USSR was a communistic state, it wasn't even a "socialism" the party claimed, it was straight up totalitarian state no doubt.

@personbob8691

3 жыл бұрын

@@mashka1572 no have you ever read unbiased sources probably not

Two things nobody can choose. Parents and Russia's president

@santiagoamenabar2370

6 жыл бұрын

Porcupine Tree Is Love jajajaja

@mr.kostas3729

6 жыл бұрын

Haha. Nice one.

@tznwyvuk471

6 жыл бұрын

And Montenegro president too 😅

@saviobiogen9914

6 жыл бұрын

In fact Putin was elected with 79% of votes. Your rusophobic myths are fake.

@_smarth__mahajan_4293

6 жыл бұрын

Adalat Mammadov sir with respect . It's just a damn saying. No need to shout out that you are a Commie too (p.s I am)

I can't believe they've been gone for 100 years. When I learned about the youngest daughter Anastasia, it changed my life forever.

@Elainerulesutube

6 жыл бұрын

elsa1942 Well, at least the mystery of Anastasia has been solved.

@LightForxes

6 жыл бұрын

Cool Lab Fuck off

@aliyah2393

5 жыл бұрын

Cool Lab You do realize that the Bolsheviks KILLED AN INNOCENT FAMILY!! The children had NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS NOR THE SERVANTS OR THE TSARINA ! Nickolas should have been exiled not killed or him and his family should have fled for America or other parts of the world to be free

@theworldoverheavan560

5 жыл бұрын

@@aliyah2393 innocent my ass

@pedrocavalcantesantana7378

3 жыл бұрын

@@aliyah2393 nicholas had the bullet coming, not his family tho

Because they killed the entire family (children), Nicholas became a martyr rather than what he was

Youu need a tough man to lead tough people.

@krazytroutcatcher

4 жыл бұрын

Victor Tecpa In WW2 the British tortured both German and Russian soldiers for information. When some of those old Germans were interviewed back in the early 2000’s, they praised the the Russians for their strength and resilience to British torture.

@marisamartin3664

3 жыл бұрын

You don't need a man who kills everyone who questions him...

@Victor-kt6qn

3 жыл бұрын

@@marisamartin3664 oh please don't tell me you believe your president doesn't do it either. He's probably just more discreet about it. No one stays in power by being nice to your enemies.

@magdatvfreire430

3 жыл бұрын

@@marisamartin3664 E precisohtraduzir para o portugues🤪😳

@yoshi9358

3 жыл бұрын

@@Victor-kt6qn Yes that's why other countries have changing leaders, because our leaders seek to maintain power by being the more popular alternative rather than strangling the opposition

3:46 How I open the door when my boyfriend is coming to meet me.

@kunal_gawade

4 жыл бұрын

Lol😂😂😂🤣 that lucky guy😍😍

@MistehbigPants

4 жыл бұрын

Are you single?

@sherryr8671

4 жыл бұрын

@@MistehbigPants dude, you'll get nowhere Dont even try and save some dignity...

@MistehbigPants

4 жыл бұрын

@@sherryr8671 You're loss, Im worth marching towards the door for

@sherryr8671

4 жыл бұрын

@@MistehbigPants lol sure bud

The white army lost because of their disorganization. Not all were allied with the Tsar as they say here. They came from all different ideologies, but were against the Bolsheviks. Lack of leadership ruined them militarily.

@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917

6 жыл бұрын

Braeden Griffiths The White Army had a centralized leadership among the generals loyal to the Czar, Kolchak, Krasnov. Denikin and others. They also had the support of an invasion of 17 of the biggest armies. They lost because the people supported the Bolsheviks, and they were armed to.the teeth. Gun control was overturned by the Bolsheviks.

@randomradek5284

5 жыл бұрын

Yep, sad. They could save Russia from a disaster.

@coniston3106

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, some of them didn't support the Tsar, but didn't want the Bolsheviks as their rulers. Basically they were everyone against the Bolsheviks, even if they themselves had different ideologies.

@DrMosseeay

2 жыл бұрын

Either way, they would of wanted to recapture the Tsar and use him as a figurehead to the White Faction and gain support from monarchists or benefactors of the monarchy.

I would have made myself Czar a long time ago if I was Putin.

@BritishRepublicsn

3 жыл бұрын

And risk overthrow?

@yourownfather6709

3 жыл бұрын

@@BritishRepublicsn tbf tsar didn’t know anything about running a country let alone the biggest one , so his risk is lower

@BritishRepublicsn

3 жыл бұрын

@@yourownfather6709only about 20% of the Russian population want the monarchy back, Putin will still risk overthrow

@originalcomment4818

3 жыл бұрын

@@BritishRepublicsn that is a lot considering how much time has passed and how much soviet propaganda has been forced onto russia

@BritishRepublicsn

3 жыл бұрын

@@originalcomment4818 it’s probably less, and it’s still the vast minority

Country boy in : North Carolina...I LOVE RUSSIA...

@Drannn54

3 жыл бұрын

North Carolina is the region in the USA, US IS A COUNTRY

Could you imagine if the Romanovs were still in power they would be the oldest ruling house in Europe and they would be in power for 400 years and out of all the other ruling house the richest in all of Europe Hell my grandpapa always said to me compared to Russian palaces Buckingham palace is a 1 room cottage lol and the jewelry in Russia there were stones the size of goose eggs And out of all the other ruling houses the Romanovs paid the coast of there palaces out of there own pockets since they had there own money from the business that they owned that’s what a lot of people really don’t understand

@BenzinB70

5 жыл бұрын

Benjamin in the ancient Russian language of Novels means-a new Roman in this case, the word "Roman" can be interpreted as-an Arab or a Gypsy

@nicole.stanhope

5 жыл бұрын

*Their That’s their house There - LOOK OVER THERE. They’re (they are) - They’re right.

@murat7006

5 жыл бұрын

The Osman family rules the ottoman for 600 years. That’s the longest reign of any family in power.

@indycoon

5 жыл бұрын

During WWI 4 Empires were destroyed. It's easy to blame Bolsheviks but they were just puppets. It was a fight between Empires.

@AJ-jv1wh

5 жыл бұрын

@@murat7006 I think they meant currently. If the Romanovs still ruled, they'd currently be the longest reign alive

That last bit. Where she said that the government can change in unpredictable ways is just plain wrong. Everyone from the outside could see the downfall of the romanovs. It was so clear considering the Tsar could barely control the military let alone the actual people.

Western media: Putin is a Communist villain ... A little later he is an imperialist, a villain conservative ... A little later he is a communist, then Alexei Navalani holds the imperialist flag, so he is on the right track, then Putin is a communist again ... When you are already doing propaganda, you do how should😂😂😂

@kevinbergin9971

2 жыл бұрын

Clearly he must be great because he never, never, Never loses an election ... NEVER!

Putin is positioning himself to end like Tsar Nicholas

@vulkron324

2 жыл бұрын

If so im gonna make sure you go first

I met a refugee from the Russian Revolution she was a passenger in my Uber. Nice lady, I was shocked because of how long ago it was.

@chungusmaximus526

3 жыл бұрын

That's crazy man.

@tomaszzalewski4541

3 жыл бұрын

How old was she?

@eboooo

3 жыл бұрын

@@tomaszzalewski4541 almost a hundred

Yes compare us russians to religious fanatics in the middle east . Very subtle but not missed . Sly economist . As my english teacher taught me in highschool. A good essay does not have to be long , it needs to have the good side of the story and the bad side . This video just shows your bias and how bad orators you are . Had you shown a couple of good deeds along with the senseless allegations. Really shameless with the bias these days .

@user-tg7ox8de1y

5 жыл бұрын

When they talk about Orthodox church they either say how its mystical, traditional and beautiful or how its corrupt, backwards and shady. They either picture us as backwards, brutal and evil or some legendary place where time stopped and people still live a simple, coasy and "normal" life. But thats west and its how they wanna look at us, we cant change that. They like to think that they are a "modern" society that lives in the "21 century" yet they cant explain what is modern nor what it means to live in 21 century. They forgot the simple question of why are we here and what is our purpouse and started worshiping the green dollar as theire new God. To them modern way of life is money, cars, boats, palaces and reaches that they cant believe that people still go to Church that believes in God and that there is still a church that honors Jesus Christ and his teachings, and that there are people who still live a simple life surraunded by modern technology not obsesed with money and power. This is why we will always be different to them, and why they will always look at us and mock and judge us and compare us to theire cars with ours as if that is a meashure of success. Поздрав из Србије брате!

@heathert5455

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-tg7ox8de1y It depends on the person. You have your selfish, narcissistic, materialistic person everywhere...unfortunately. But, I get your point that we, in the West, are very materialistic and want more...this especially hits hard with the younger generation:/ I still remember a time when I was a child, in the 1990s, and children would still play outside and people would actually TALK face to face with one another instead of always texting. One of the stupidest things that I've ever seen is two friends sitting next to each other and texting to each other instead of talking. Yes, A LOT of us lost our way and we live too fast. Our food is mass produced and most of it is genetically modified so this causes issues with the body which cause obesity and other issues. And sugar is in just about every food nowadays. Most of the local "mom and pop" shops (example: grocery stores that were owned by a family) have been bought out or starved out by big corporations. Just recently, a local, privately owned, pharmacy in my town was bought out and shut down by CVS pharmacy which is a big, multi-million dollar, company. As for Russians, I personally have no issues with them. You are just trying to survive in the world like the rest of us. I pray that you guys do NOT become multi-cultural and that you are able to retain your traditions and your culture. I wish you well, From the USA

@ghostofcato3052

4 жыл бұрын

Economist = Rothchild LIES!!

@sasukeuchiha961

3 жыл бұрын

That's savage tho

They were all beautiful and dint deserve to die

@mathewjose4753

3 жыл бұрын

This horribly..... Some of them didn't died by that bullet alone. They were beaten mercilessly by the Soviets

@manifest5768

3 жыл бұрын

Monarchs are a stain on society.

@aeoe665

3 жыл бұрын

@@manifest5768 monarchs are just country who colonize anything they explored first

@foodiesmukbang874

3 жыл бұрын

Looks can’t hold the personality within only their actions can tell how the person really was.

@coniston3106

3 жыл бұрын

They were stabbed with bayonet, then sawed into pieces and thrown into land mines, then burned. Only to be found decades later.

When power relays on faith than you have real power

The economist that cause the 2008 ecomony crisis😂😂😂

I wouldn't say the fall of the Russian Empire was unpredictable. Russia was torn apart from the many revolts in the country. Nicolas II was not prepared to face such a political crisis.

And yet again, the KZread algorithm does its magic.

When talkin shit about others - first look into your heart

People around the world have different cultures, you cannot enforce one type of government on everyone and expect it to work. It's just absurd to think that your own government system is superior to everyone else's and hence they must adopt it.

@kakhagvelesiani3877

6 жыл бұрын

Bullshit. If some country has slavery, I bet you would be the first to call it barbaric. There are cultures and civilizations that are better than others and also brought technological progress to mankind. Rome civilization was far superior to tribes living in Gaulle, Iberia, Britain. Greek world was far greater and better than many other cultures. History tells us, that they are societies which are clearly better than others

@saturn724

6 жыл бұрын

Europe alone has a variety of government systems, but each one is successful in its own way. UK and Spain have a hereditary monarchy, France and Germany do not, but each has a flourishing economy. There is no such thing as "one system fits all", even when it comes to democracy, each country has its own approach to it. Differences occur due to cultural and historical roots. There is no way you can enforce one exact system to every nation.

@victorlobos2710

5 жыл бұрын

Well, you are too kind saying Spain has a flourishing economy….

@junaidfatimah9297

2 жыл бұрын

I said this a lot, we all can’t have the same governing systems… Democracy was forced on some part in Africa see how it turns out.

These Russian guards have excellent marching/dancing skills

@alexander3558

2 жыл бұрын

I’m sure their lives depend on it lol

I think as history tells one story we must learn the history being made now. History helps us write with a finer quill the history made now, look at when Alaska belonged to Russia and was sold to America and the mistake that was.🤯🤯🤯

@here_we_go_again2571

3 жыл бұрын

Selling Alaska to USA (1867) was a smart move by Alexander ii. Russia needed money to build a national railroad. AND The way people from the British Isles were coming to Canada; Britain taking over Alaska was almost a given.

The oppressed always becomes oppressor at the end.

Its not the 1900s now so dont count on something to rise and fall so easily now

@LifeOfTheParty323

6 жыл бұрын

Saddam Hussein.

@julius1085

6 жыл бұрын

arab shitholes aren't the same as stable first world countries

@Prussian_Defence

6 жыл бұрын

Makedonia e BULGARIA

@ifonly6788

6 жыл бұрын

ivan japan?

@blasty137

6 жыл бұрын

One of the key elements for a revolution (especially one which cannot be conducted without at least a little violence) is demographics - it is far likelier to happen in countries with a large percentage of young people (approx. 16 to 25) and a small percentage of old people. Older people tend to be not only significantly less violent but also more conservative - this is one of the drivers of political changes in the West as well (Brexit being the best example).

Has anyone seen the Economist video about how Crimea was a part of Russia dating back to the 17th Century? Me neither.

That final statement was more like a wish from The Economist editors than anything substancial...

Bruh the Economist with some one-sided information

Question is, what other Russia do you prefer? Modern Russia under Putin, Socialist Russia under Stalin or Lenin or perhaps the chaotic and horrifying living conditions that the country endured during the nineties? All you can say is "He is like the Tsar" but that only applies because the last time Russia was this stable was during the last Tsar's rule. That's it, that's the comparison and that's where it ends.

I believe the new order of Tsar is coming..

@marisamartin3664

3 жыл бұрын

who would that be?

@jesusislordsavior6343

3 жыл бұрын

Mantan Orang Kaya I think that Mr. Xi would like to be more than just emperor of China. He might like to be tsar of Russia as well, if not master of the whole world. He has many more employees than does Putin; and he seems to be more ruthless, judging by the concentration camps in Xinjiang. Sometime in the future, an antichrist figure is coming who will demand worship from everyone. But he will be destroyed, and at the end of history JESUS Our Redeemer will reign supreme.

@joebacon6817

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesusislordsavior6343 Xi would sooner embarass China in front of the entire world than declare himself a Tsarist. He will be the general secretary of the CCP until he dies, no question about it.

@manasbharadwaj2026

3 жыл бұрын

I am the senate- Emperor Putin.

That was a totally unnecessary carnage. I'm sure it was Stalin who gave orders of murdering the Romanovs family. Sad.

The Whites were not a unified force, nor did all the factions that historians label as "whites" support the Tzar. You're the Economist, you should be able to present accurate information.

So much disinformation in this video.

"The Economist" = More Globalist Propaganda.

@radianzero

5 жыл бұрын

Cool, so a vid about Putin is 'globalist' which is a term made by neo-nazis themselves?

@yak2425

5 жыл бұрын

MrJojo8675309 , every news outlet is all a version of propaganda ... the world is filled with different opinions and ideas ... it’s either agree with the news or don’t ... not one news outlet is right

@enzyxsyro9211

5 жыл бұрын

I love propaganda

@j.obrien4990

5 жыл бұрын

@@yak2425 since Mr Jojo did have a real critique but didn't like what he was hearing he labeled it as propaganda.

@sunnyray7819

4 жыл бұрын

Yup, wait this isn't RT???.....

Long Live Blessed Tsar Nicholas II!!!!

@sauraroy1346

3 жыл бұрын

Long Live Comrade Lenin

@mathewjose4753

3 жыл бұрын

@@sauraroy1346 He is dead and the Soviet dictators completely destroyed his Ideologies

@helmutschmidt50

3 жыл бұрын

​@@mathewjose4753 Lenin wasn't a clean figure. Had he lived longer, he would do the same things.

@helmutschmidt50

3 жыл бұрын

@Anonymer Nutzer Monarchs aren't actuallly bad

@kerajohnson1922

3 жыл бұрын

@Anonymer Nutzer not all monarchies can be compared to dictatorships. absolute monarchs are problematic (and definitely compatible to tyranny), but constitutional monarchs are very different. If a king or queen is given the proper limitations and restrictions to keep their power in check, I see no problem in it. Look at the UK, Japan, Norway, and Belgium.

история идёт по кругу

It's so cheap propaganda that it's even funny to listen. > "The Army of Whites, which was betrayed to the Tsar" - the Tsar abdicated long before the Civil War, none of the political forces of the White Movement proclaimed its goal to restore the monarchy in Russia, for the most part the White defended their privileges and the hierarchical order that suited them. > "The Bolsheviks decided to shoot Emperor Nicholas II" - He is not only has not been an emperor for a year, but Bolsheviks did not decide to shoot him either. The decision to execution was taken spontaneously, in connection with force majeure circumstances - the White Offensive on Yekaterinburg, the decision of the Ural Revolutionary Military Council without the sanction of Moscow. About "strengthening the power of Putin "Through "Political Repressions™" and "Military conflicts" -- I generally keep quiet. Especially about military conflicts from the lips of NATO members is interesting to listen to. > "Boris Yeltsin tried to build a democratic state" -- AHA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!! Can you hear the knock? This Joseph Goebbels breaks out of Hell to claim compensation for copyright infringement. The death of the royal family is certainly a tragedy of the Civil War. Exactly the same as the death of thousands of other families during this war, fallen under the millstone of history and caught between the White and Red Terror. The death of each family is a tragedy. Not big and not less. And to stick out specifically one and make it a symbol of martyrdom is not right. And this not the first is the Russian king who died on the throne. But for others, for some reason, do not worry. Perhaps because the nobles killed them, gentlemen, sir. They can, it's not "cattle".

So your argument starts at 0:20 when "so many" believe Putin is the new tzar.

@jameslegrand848

6 жыл бұрын

simhopp wait so would the 3 most unholy sites be the enemies of Islam ?

@beback_

6 жыл бұрын

simhopp Is this a joke I’m not getting or are you just plain insane?

@shinsenshogun900

6 жыл бұрын

CT 75-67 Ever heard of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in Russia

@eblasphamy1

6 жыл бұрын

NaderR its all to protect the zionist BOLSHIVEK criminals that control the west today

@FinnishFuturist

6 жыл бұрын

simhopp You sound like an "edgy" 14 year old. Pipe down bud.

The Tsar and his family were strongly and genuinely devout people. Olga read her Bible daily to her mother whilst they were imprisoned.

Realy beatifull family realy a clean feeling comes when see these faces.

@gabrielebianchi161

2 жыл бұрын

Because they are Christian martyrs.

@nothingnothing4857

2 жыл бұрын

@@gabrielebianchi161 how do you know that ? Jesus did not die on cross its a lie.

@gabrielebianchi161

2 жыл бұрын

@@nothingnothing4857 if you do not believe then unfortunately you are going to consume the bitter drink of misery and destruction. You know what I'm taking about........everyone does. Your knee will bow to Christ.

@nothingnothing4857

2 жыл бұрын

@@gabrielebianchi161 oo Jesusz. O Jezuz. Ooooo Jezuz. O Jesuz.

Long live the spirit of the Ramonov Monachy

@jesusislordsavior6343

3 жыл бұрын

Modise Makokwe What IS the spirit of the Romanov Monarchy? Can it be defined? If the Spirit of Christ lives in a person, that person will end up in the best place of all, no matter who his/her ancestors were.

@RT-rb8rn

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesusislordsavior6343 Calm down 😆

@personbob8691

3 жыл бұрын

Нет

This is a complete lie. Russian Empire was supposed to disappear like other monarchy's in Europe. This was a historical process closely connected with industrialization.

That zooming in on Late Nicholas II's Portrait left like a threat to Putin

Boney M said it best at the end of their track ‘Rasputin’......’Oh those Russians!!’...

great video. Thanks lots for the video. :D

My father, who is for a social democracy in my country, Italy, actually supports Putin. He said that the Russians need a strong leader, as it is always been their culture.

Stop! Bolsheviks didn't send Nickolas the 2-nd to Ekaterinburg at first. He was in Tobolsk since 1917. Only in April of 1918 he left it for Ekaterinburg. Honestly saying, I'm grateful for this video. It's cool that not only Russians watch it :)

It is hoped that the Romanov dynasty can return to Russia and establish a constitutional monarchy.

Putin is the great grandson of Rasputin. He thought his name my be too obvious, so he dropped the Ras part, to just Putin.

@itsokay2606

5 жыл бұрын

How smart 🤔

@abiebarraca5873

4 жыл бұрын

Lol. Haha

@CurtisD01

4 жыл бұрын

That's a lie, his great grandfather was Ivan Petrovich Putin

@juliewitt7496

4 жыл бұрын

It's cute, though.

@AnnaLVajda

4 жыл бұрын

Russias greatest love machine?

promoting russiophobia

@gggfyg1038

6 жыл бұрын

sadia tariq Putin is not Russia!

@mr.coolmug3181

6 жыл бұрын

Putin _is_ Russia. But because you're intolerant of Russian ways, you promote a world war with them.

@gggfyg1038

6 жыл бұрын

Putin is one person. Russia is a country of millions of people. No, not the same. Russia is full of great people of course but I can sperate them from one despotic dictator. Nobody is asking for war.

@lukStSerb

6 жыл бұрын

87% of Russian population approves Putin as their representative ..meaning if you're anti Putin then you're anti Russian as well.

@zinakojima6760

6 жыл бұрын

lukStSerb excuse me, what? Only 67% of Russians able to vote did really vote for anybody, and only 63% of those voted for Putin during the passed elections. It's less than a half. You've got wrong data

Hey Economist, what about doing a video on the very democratic Chinese government.

@alexander3558

2 жыл бұрын

Haha I see what you did there

Nicholas was not ready to be a tsar, because his father didn't prepare him. And why you don't tell about Nicholas's relatives in Britain who even didn't want to help?

We will not forget the imperial family thanks to Russia men and women were very clever people to remember that shame crime unbelievable murder.

@jnb_110

3 жыл бұрын

Im sure the Russian people did enjoy the karma they got when Stalin took power

@pedrojuan8050

3 жыл бұрын

Definitely an unnecessary killing.

@branimirkolarov3493

3 жыл бұрын

@B D stolen plan for nuclear weapons from USA, growth population would happen anyway superpower number 2 not 1. It's a pity that Stalin didn't died during his robberies.

This first picture is never from 1918. on the left you can see Lenin's mausoleum... Which was build several years later.

That’s one thing that makes me think; what if a lot of countries started to return to their old roots. Germany puts a Kaiser back in power, Russia reverts back to the Russian Empire, England reverts back into a monarchy, etc.

It would be more appropriate to compare Putin, not to Nicholas II, but Ivan IV.

Perhaps his greatest failing is not to have an heir much like the tsar. This position would force him to hold on, just to stay alive.

German Kaiser funded Lenin movement including Ticket Train to St. Petersburg, All for excluding Russia from WW1 by weaken it from within. It Worked But, Works too Well. it give birth the USSR

@NikolaAvramov

5 жыл бұрын

Finally somebody that knows this!

@arshaq4200

4 жыл бұрын

I know this he also brought from somwhere i don't know previously he was expelled from the country

@Angel-nu7fm

3 жыл бұрын

Read the Kaiser had a thing for the Czarina...weren't they cousins? That family gets a little creepy.....

@Airborne637

3 жыл бұрын

Bruh

@joeyreidelbach5509

3 жыл бұрын

Well Kaiser was hoping that Lenin and his group would cause small enough problems that would force the Russians out of the war without doing major harm cause William the 2nd of Germany didn't want to go to war with his cousin at all which is why he sent a letter to his cousin to talk things out.

3:47 Top 10 Entrances in Anime

You must know that the Romanovs were the richest family on the earth and in the same time the people in Russia were very poor, many of them without anything on earth

@Waiting664

Жыл бұрын

Not atheist like communism