Pros/cons of armor Conflict of nations WW3 PART TWO
Here’s the second part to the armor pros/cons this video features the main battle tank and tank destroyer.
Please leave a comment, like and subscribe to the channel I really do appreciate it 👍🏻
Here’s the second part to the armor pros/cons this video features the main battle tank and tank destroyer.
Please leave a comment, like and subscribe to the channel I really do appreciate it 👍🏻
Пікірлер: 14
Hey bro do one on ideal 10 stack
@Richy.p
Ай бұрын
Ok will have a look into this for you 👍🏻
Can you join a lobby with me in con ww3
@Richy.p
Ай бұрын
Do u use discord?
@Relex323
Ай бұрын
@@Richy.p yea
@Richy.p
Ай бұрын
@@Relex323 what’s your con name?
@Relex323
Ай бұрын
Relex
@Relex323
Ай бұрын
Relex323
Tanks are overrated. They get so many terrain negatives to damage and speed, plus, as you mentioned, they have no air defense. Extremely high component cost too. I can get a Destroyer for the same amount and have way more mobility and also naval control. Tanks do have lots of health, but I prefer to fight from range with strikers, navy or artillery before sending in national guard to claim land and cities. All the noobs go straight for multiple lv2 army bases and unlock tanks early game, probably not realizing they can only realistically produce 1/day. The less battles you engage in needlessly, the better. I usually max infantry(for mortars) and get lv1 recons in groups to mop up any defensive remnants, with national guard following behind them to garrison in cities/claim territory. Later I add SAMs, MLRS and radar to my main battle groups. 2 SAMs, 2 MLRS, 1 Radar, 1 Recon, 4 Infantry.
@Richy.p
Ай бұрын
Yes I do agree with you very expensive unit considering their limited uses. I do like using mrls for thier range. Airforce is also very useful and more flexible 👍🏻