In this video, I showed a non rigorous proof of the product rule
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 13
@pradeepgupta3643 Жыл бұрын
Explaining brilliantly
@anonymous-ui7il Жыл бұрын
please do make the video on the rubrics cube, would love it
@user-mq8kb7bo8d Жыл бұрын
I love your videos, well explained!👌
@williampeters712 ай бұрын
I watched a professor from MIT show this proof but he botched it totally so I could not understand him he did not make a mistake but he did not place emphasis on adding and subtracting "something" that is the why of it. Of course this proof we take for granted is a stroke of genius I am wondering how Newton proved this that is how his proof was unsatisfactory and Yes will check your web site like to see a proof of rubrics cube!
@holyshit922 Жыл бұрын
We should add zero to be able to collect the terms and separate fractions I found in the internet how to solve Rubic's cube by LBL method which is the easiest one Can we find any mathematic problems involving Rubic's cube ?
@punditgi Жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@MalatjiMeshack4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, I'm learning a lot from your videos
@ThenSaidHeUntoThem Жыл бұрын
👌👌👌😍😍
@christophvonpezold4699 Жыл бұрын
64th view, really nice number in that iirc it's. the lowest number that is both a perfect cube and a perfect square (besides 1 of course) great video!
@PrimeNewtons
Жыл бұрын
64 is the smallest number with exactly 7 divisors 👌🤣
@Sonny2009Ай бұрын
One thing I get confused is Newton's f prime notation drops the dx. But Liebnez always keeps the dx. Then when we try to do integral we need to write dx back to f prime. Does anybody know why that is? And
Пікірлер: 13
Explaining brilliantly
please do make the video on the rubrics cube, would love it
I love your videos, well explained!👌
I watched a professor from MIT show this proof but he botched it totally so I could not understand him he did not make a mistake but he did not place emphasis on adding and subtracting "something" that is the why of it. Of course this proof we take for granted is a stroke of genius I am wondering how Newton proved this that is how his proof was unsatisfactory and Yes will check your web site like to see a proof of rubrics cube!
We should add zero to be able to collect the terms and separate fractions I found in the internet how to solve Rubic's cube by LBL method which is the easiest one Can we find any mathematic problems involving Rubic's cube ?
Awesome!
Thank you so much, I'm learning a lot from your videos
👌👌👌😍😍
64th view, really nice number in that iirc it's. the lowest number that is both a perfect cube and a perfect square (besides 1 of course) great video!
@PrimeNewtons
Жыл бұрын
64 is the smallest number with exactly 7 divisors 👌🤣
One thing I get confused is Newton's f prime notation drops the dx. But Liebnez always keeps the dx. Then when we try to do integral we need to write dx back to f prime. Does anybody know why that is? And
22nd view, 5th like😗
the rubrics cube and then chess