Being a fleet manager that had all three the last choice would be the Mercedes. They cost a fortune to fix and at a 100,000 miles the dash lights come on all the time for more service that are usually $1500.00 or more. The pro master has one big fault and that is front wheel drive, it sucks in the snow because being a utility vehicle all the weight is in the back. The engine is the Pentastar v6 in everything dodge makes from jeep, Ram, Challenger, charger, etc. Its a 2-300,000 mile engine and give decent mileage and minimal maintenance. The Ford Transit is my choice. Rear wheel drive, good powertrain if you stay away from turbos. Also minimal maintenance and is also reliable. Thats my 2 cents from experience.

@cwheremonster8870

3 ай бұрын

I wish your comment was much higher… this has been my experience, as well.

I’ve had both. I started with Promaster. Bought a Sprinter and put a ton f money into a build. The ability to utilize 4WD/AWD was nice. But I missed the wide space and flat walls of the Promaster. I’m back in a Promaster, and never looking back. Oh, and I don’t miss the $1200 service fees for working ona Mercedes.

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing. Nice to hear from someone who has done both! Glad to hear you're happy with what you've got.

@GOLDVIOLINbowofdeath

3 ай бұрын

Those “flat” walls don’t allow parallel parking on many city streets since all roads are crowned for drainage thus tilting the top toward the curb and the signs are usually so close to the curb you will be scraping more with the Promaster. Same problem with tree limbs

@GOLDVIOLINbowofdeath

3 ай бұрын

Just remember, some builders love the Promasters because they know there will be more money leftover to pay them for a build for people with lower budgets. Similar logic for why manufacturers/inventors go for Mercedes first because owners have more money to spend on accessories. To not talk about the build quality of a Promaster vs Sprinter seems negligent. Mercedes beats it hands down. It only takes a 10 second glance for me to see the difference

@cwheremonster8870

3 ай бұрын

Huh.. that’s not been my experience. Let me repeat… I love the Sprinter. But my warranty items were 3:1 in favor of the Promaster. I’ve got zero horses left in this fight. Buy the rig that is right for YOUR build.

@cwheremonster8870

3 ай бұрын

Ummm.. so those same crowns don’t apply to a Sprinter ?? Sorry, brotha .. I full timed in a sprinter for almost two years . Not sure what your point is (?).

Promaster: 9-speed trans (smooth), good gas mileage, enough power, small turn radius, Front Wheel Drive (drives the same full of empty), more room inside, dealers all across the USA, shocks to not hang low, more ground clearance, more options (less 4WD and diesel), lower repair cost. low upfront cost. I put KO2 A/T tires on, so snow, mud and off-road has been fine. Do not have to worry about turbo failure, fan parts in my engine. Promaster was an easy choice.

So helpful. I'm looking into van life. 70 year old woman that wants to travel to visit family across the country.

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

Glad to hear it! Traveling to visit family and friends is a super common use for many of our clients (and us too!).

From England, I respect your understanding of functionality, you understand you need to live vanlife to understand it, I'm forever perfecting my camper 👍

Great video, just in the design phase of my 170 sprinter. But this video really shows the actual size of the van. Thanks!

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

Thanks! The 170 has a LOT of space to work with inside. Good luck with your build!

Pro Master is more of an East Coast van (Low bridges on the parkways) also no BLM land. Sprinter has way higher maintenance cost and harder to find repair shops.

Great information Ben. AWD is definitely needed in the Southeast with the dirt/mud after a rain.

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

Thanks! Yep, sinking mud is a no-go for the Promaster.

Wow very cool

Promaster really needs to offer an AWD option…regardless, I would still rather have a Ford Transit over both of these.

@EvoCarl

4 ай бұрын

Transit with the wet belt problems? No chance 😁

@walwalka

4 ай бұрын

⁠@@EvoCarlNot in the US it doesn’t. Timing chains around.

@EvoCarl

4 ай бұрын

@@walwalka yeah don’t think the US gets the EcoPop 2L like the EU. Lucky, shockingly bad engine.

@walwalka

4 ай бұрын

@@EvoCarl Quite the difference it makes, I’ve got the 3.5L ecoboost and AWD in my van. It’s been fantastic.

@EvoCarl

4 ай бұрын

@@walwalka would love that over here 👍

I would prefer the Ford all wheel drive.

Great comparison. When, or if, I actually go with a Class B, I am pretty sure it will be Promaster.

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

Thanks! We tend to agree and think the Promaster is the best choice for most people.

You want best of both worlds, cheaper to service and parts are available worldwide: FORD Transit 350HD Twin turbo, AWD. Great interior height, Wider, 300+ HP. Strange that most people don't build more from the Transit platform.

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

The last couple of years it was nearly impossible to get a Transit. Fortunately that has improved so I expect we'll see more Transit builds.

One question I always had about these builds is the water situation. Is it hookup only or is there a tank? I don't see where the tank would be or how much it would even hold.

All-wheel drive is a must on a van if you plan to go in snow, sand or mud. I wouldn't take a Promaster off the pavement. In our market (California), no one wants 2WD vans. They don't sell because they are way too easy to get stuck. Cool interiors- nice work!

@christopherhaak9824

6 күн бұрын

That's completely silly, there are promasters driving and exploring all over CA.

Neither, I got a Ford Transit AWD with a more horsepower and more torque than both the Sprinter and Promaster.

@van_mod1

3 ай бұрын

Just be careful of those super low shock mounts on the Transit. For me, nothing beats the ProMaster for usable interior space given the exterior size.

@mattv5774

3 ай бұрын

Ford transit sucks I work on them every day I hate every bit of them especially changing the brakes is just horrible design

@jeffsteinmetz7188

3 ай бұрын

@@van_mod1 Upgraded suspension to Van Compass 2.0 kit for AWD. Lower shock mounts not an issue anymore.

Transit

They Both Look good. and fancy. too fancy. beds too low for my bike. I want to put my mtb in with wheels on..

Of course you can’t go on the mod because is only front wheel drive 😂

Sprinter and Mercedes both have some of the poorest reliability issues both power and driveline.

I'm surprised people don't desire a private vented enclosed head.

@ReadySetVan

4 ай бұрын

We also do builds with a private head/shower, and they are quite popular. This build has a vented toilet located in one the the bench seats.

Its the sprinter. The other is a death trap. That mini me window. You cant even fit your arm out of. And it looks stupid.

Promaster is better . Gasoline motor. Diesels suck and pricey

One is garbage and one is the absolutely the worst garbage ever!🤔

Gutless throw away vans . . .

If you are 6,4" or taller, the Ford Transit is the best van. The Promaster is very wimpy in the mountains

There's a new super high roof Promaster and redesign that makes it more appealing to me.I do wish for a AWD model later.

@ReadySetVan

Ай бұрын

Yep, we'll be getting one at some point this summer, hopefully.